This manual applies to the following North American … Automotive_20cb1.… · Supplier Quality...

Supplier Quality Manual

Main Screen

MainScreen

Table of Contents Forms

New Model

General Information

Mass Production

Reference SQM Master List 04-01-2016 Revision Information

Quality Control Regulations and Minimum Quality System Requirements

Market

CountryRegulations

Click a tab to begin navigation

This manual applies to the following North American Honda Facilities

AEP - ELP - HCM - HDM - HMA - HMIN - HPE - HPPG - HSC - HTM - IPS -MAP

Honda Company PrincipleMaintaining a global viewpoint, we are dedicated to supplying products of the highest quality yet at a reasonable

price for worldwide customer satisfaction.

A key to Honda acronyms can be found in the Definitions document in the Reference section. For the best results please use Adobe Acrobat 7.0 or higher to view this manual.

Click on a tab to select

This on-line manual is the official version of the Honda Supplier Quality Manual. Your access is your implied permission to download and print a working copy for your business. It is your responsibility to use the most

current version posted on this web site.

vc037429Typewritten Text



Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production

ReferenceQuality Control Regulations and Minimum Quality System Requirements

Market

CountryRegulations

Forms 5P CRF IPPAAR/IPP

Inspection Fixture

Lot Control and Traceability PAC-VData MPR

Tool TrialPQCT PV Testing SpeCla Tool Trial History

Forms - Blank Clicking on a black tab will open the form, but it may cause the SQM to close.WARNING


Lot Control

SQM Master List 04-01-2016 Revision Information

vc037429Typewritten Text Initial Production Parts Quality Assurance Declaration



VC037429Typewritten Text


Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production

Reference SQM Master ListQuality Control Regulations and Minimum Quality System Requirements04-01-2016 Revision

Information

Market

CountryRegulations

Forms5P CRF IPPAAR/IPP

Inspection Fixture

Lot Control and Traceabilit PAC-VData MPR

Tool Trial

Clicking on a black tab will open the form but it may cause the SQM to closeWARNING

PV Testing SpeCla Tool Trial HistoryPQCT

Forms - Blank

Clicking on a black tab will open the form, but it may cause the SQM to close.

To open or download this form inside the manual, please return to the Forms Screen (page 3) and follow the instructions.

CRF FormsCRF Operation

StandardCRF Blank and Numbered Form

(matches the Operation Standard)


( p )


VC037429Typewritten Text


Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production


Information

Market

CountryRegulations


Inspection Fixture


Tool Trial

WARNING Clicking on a black tab will open the form but it may cause the SQM to close


Forms - Blank



Receiving Inspection - Blank Regulation Data - Blank

Data Forms

Inspection Data - Blank




Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production


Information

Market

CountryRegulations


Inspection Fixture


Tool Trial



Forms - Blank



Supplier Inspection Fixture Concept

Gage R&R (Long Method) Blank

Gage R&R (Short Method) - Blank

Inspection Fixture FormsSupplier Inspection

Fixture


Fixture Concept Method) Blank Method) BlankFixture



Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production


Information

Market

CountryRegulations


Inspection Fixture


Tool Trial



Forms - Blank



IPPAAR Form**

IPPAAR Operation Standard

IPP Tag**

IPP Tag Operation Standard

IPPAAR/IPP Forms


** IPPAAR and IPP forms are created in the Honda Supply Team Portal / Change Point Control Application.

Tag Standard



Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production


Information

Market

CountryRegulations


Inspection Fixture


Tool Trial



Forms - Blank



LNDD- Blank and Operation Standard

Lot Control Notification Example

Process Display Form (PDF) -Blank and Op Std.

Lot Control and Traceability


pp p



Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production


Information

Market

CountryRegulations


Inspection Fixture



Forms - Blank

WARNING Clicking on a black tab will open the form, but it may cause the SQM to close. To open or download this form inside the manual, please return to the Forms

Screen (page 3) and follow the instructions.

History

MPR Checksheets (MPR Matrix)Casting Injection Molding

Label

Torque

WeldFl id Fill

Part Marking

Heat Treatment

Hot Plate Welding

Label

Machining

Painting

Printed Circuit Board Sonic / Ultrasonic /

Vibration / Friction Welding

Stamping

WeldFluid Fill

Error Proofing

Note the MPRs linked here are the most current version and must be used for the next

Wire Harness


Note the MPRs linked here are the most current version and must be used for the next Request For Quote (RFQ). They must also be applied when the supplier has a part issue

that the MPR will countermeasure.

MPR Procedure Leak Test



Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production


Information

Market

CountryRegulations


Inspection Fixture


Tool Trial


PV Testing Tool Trial HistoryPQCT

Forms - Blank



PV Testing and PV Testing Risk Analysis Form

PV Testing Risk Analysis Numbered (matches the Operation Standard)

PV Testing Risk Analysis Blank


PV Testing Schedule and Results Summary Form Operation Standard

PV Testing Blank and Numbered (matches the Operation Standard)

SpeCla




Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production


Information

Market

CountryRegulations


Inspection Fixture


Tool Trial



Forms - Blank



SpeCla Forms

Electrode Review - Blank

Texture Indication Map (TIM) - Blank and Op Std.


Appearance Part and Tool Detail



Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production


Information

Market

CountryRegulations


Inspection Fixture


Tool Trial


PV Testing SpeCla Supply Tool Trial HistoryPQCT

Forms - Blank



Supply Part Forms


Standard



Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production


Information

Market

CountryRegulations



Main Screen

Quality Control Regulations and Minimum Quality System Requirements

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production

Reference SQM Master List 04-01-2016 Revision Information

Market

CountryRegulations

F t G t S li Q lit

General Information

Factory Guest Engineer

Supplier Quality Performance Rating



Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production


Information

Market

CountryRegulations

New ModelBar Code Standard CRF Data

Limit Sample

Inspection Fixture Design

Master Sample Part Part Maturation Part QualityNM Receiving

Gloss Meter Correlation Requirements

Master Sample Development MPR

Part Approval

Part Maturation Expectations

Part Quality Standard PFMEA

PQCT PV Testing SAP SpeCla TPR Traceability and Lot Control

PAC-VNM Receiving Inspection



Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production

Reference SQM Master List 07-01-2015 Revision InformationQuality Control Regulations and

Minimum Quality System Requirements

Market

CountryRegulations

New Model

Bar Code Standard CRF Data

Limit Sample





Part Approval





MPR ProceduresMPR ProcedureLink to MPR Checksheet Page

Note the MPRs linked here are the most current version and must be used for the next Request For Quote (RFQ). They must also be applied when the supplier has a part issue

that the MPR will countermeasure.



Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production



Market

CountryRegulations


Limit Sample





Part Approval





PV TestingPV Testing Procedure PV Test Risk Analysis Form Guidelines



Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production



Market

CountryRegulations


Limit Sample





Part Approval





Forms - Blank

WARNING Clicking on a black tab will open the form, but it may cause the SQM to close.


SAP (Specified Action Plan) SAP Procedure SAP ExampleSAP Components


pp


Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production



Market

CountryRegulations


Limit Sample





Part Approval





SpeCla Minimum Tooling Specifications f S Cl P tSpeCla Procedure for SpeCla PartsSpeCla Procedure



Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production



Market

CountryRegulations

Change Point Control(IPPAAR / IPP)

Honda Supply Parts Trouble Controlled

5P

Mass Production

Gloss Meter Correlation

Index System

Nonconforming Product

pp yManagement (DSPS/JSPS)Containment

IdentificationControl

Sort LabelRequirements

Minimum Test Requirements (MTR)

Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) Requirements



Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production



Market

CountryRegulations

Mass ProductionChange Point Control

(IPPAAR / IPP)

Honda Supply Parts Trouble Controlled Sort

5P

Gloss Meter Correlation

Index System

Regular Lot Control


Management (DSPS/JSPS)Containment


Label Requirements



Supply Parts (DSPS/JSPS)DSPS Flow

JSPS Flow

Honda Supply Parts Trouble Management Flow FlowTrouble Management



Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production



Market

CountryRegulations

Mass ProductionChange Point Control

(IPPAAR / IPP)

Honda Supply Parts Trouble M t (DSPS/JSPS)

Controlled C t i t S t L b l

5P

Gloss Meter Correlation R i tl

Index System

Regular Lot Control


Management (DSPS/JSPS)Containment


Sort Label Requirements



Minimum Test Requirements (MTR)MTR

SRS AssembliesMTR

ProcedureMTR Suspension

Damper AssembliesMTR Electro Mechanical and

Mechanical AssembliesMTR Electronic

Assemblies



Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production



Market

CountryRegulations

Market Related Mass Production Procedures

Ch P i t C t l I d N f iC t ll d El t i

Market

Change Point Control(IPPAAR / IPP)

Index System


Controlled Containment

ElectronicSort Label5P MTR

Challenge Quality (CQ) Process Overview



Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production



Market

CountryRegulations

Reference

Acronyms and Definitions

HSQM Continuous Improvement Flow

Supplier Part SchedulePlantCodes



Main Screen

CoverPage


New Model

General Information

Mass Production



Market

CountryRegulations

Country Regulations

China Compulsory Certification (CCC)


Supplier Quality Manual Table of Contents

HSQM-TOC Page 1/4 07/01/2015

Forms (Blank Form, Completion Operation Standards and Examples)

5P (5 Principles for Problem Solving) CRF (Countermeasure Request Form)

Data Sheets Inspection Data Receiving Inspection Data Regulation Data Inspection Fixture

Gage R&R Worksheet Long Method Gage R&R Worksheet Short Method Supplier Inspection Fixture Concept Supplier Inspection Fixture IPPAAR/IPP (Initial Production Parts Advance Approval Request/ Initial Production Parts) IPPAAR IPP Tag Lot Control and Traceability LNDD (Lot Number Display Detail) LNDD Operation Standard Lot Control Notification Example PDF (Process Display Form) MPR (Minimum Process Requirements) Checksheets Casting Error Proofing Fluid Fill Heat Treatment Hot Plate Welding Injection Molding Label Machining Painting Part Marking PCB Sonic / Vibration / Friction Welding Stamping

Torque Weld Wire Harness PAC-V (Process Assurance Capability Verification) SheetLeak Test

MA04922Text Box Main Menu Previous Menu


HSQM-TOC Page 2/4 07/01/2015

Forms (Blank Form, Completion Operation Standards and Examples) (continued)

PV (Part Validation) Testing PV Testing Blank and Numbered PV Testing Risk Analysis PV Testing Schedule and Results Summary Form Operation Standard Styling Parts Guideline (SpeCla) Electrode Review Texture Indication Map Tool Trial History Sheet

General Information FGE (Factory Guest Engineer)


New Model Bar Code Standard CRF (Countermeasure Request Form)

Data E-Requirements Gloss Meter Correlation Requirements

Inspection Fixture Design Guideline Limit Sample Master Sample Development Minimum Process Requirements Procedure New Model Receiving Inspection PAC-V (Process Assurance Capability Verification) Part Approval Part Maturation Expectations Part Quality Standard PFMEA (Process Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) PQCT (Process Quality Control Table) PV (Part Validation) Testing PV (Part Validation) Testing Procedure PV Test Risk Analysis Form Guidelines

SAP (Specified Action Plan) SAP Components SAP Procedure SAP Example

PFMEA (Process Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) PFMEA Operation Standard PQCT (Process Quality Control Table)



HSQM-TOC Page 3/4 07/01/2015

Mass Production

5P (5 Principles for Problem Solving) Change Point Control (IPPAAR/IPP) Controlled Containment Sort Label Forms Ordering IPP and Lot Control Gloss Meter Correlation Requirements Honda Supply Parts Trouble Management Honda Supply Parts Trouble Management DSPS Flow JSPS Flow Identification Control Index System

MTR (Minimum Test Requirement) MTR (Minimum Test Requirement) Procedure Minimum Test Requirements Electro-Mechanical and Mechanical Assemblies Minimum Test Requirements Electronic Assemblies Minimum Test Requirements SRS Assemblies Minimum Test Requirements Suspension Damper Assemblies Nonconforming Product Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) Requirements

Market

Challenge Quality (CQ) Process Overview Quality Control Regulations and Minimum Quality System Requirements

Quality Control Regulations and Minimum Quality System Requirements Procedure Corrective Action System Operation Standards, Training, and Process Job Qualification Process Control Change Point Control Supplier Management Lot Control and Traceability Inspection, Test, and Calibration Suspect and Nonconforming Part and Abnormal Process Organization Quality Systems and Policies Preventive Maintenance

New Model (continued) SpeCla

SpeCla Procedure Minimum Tooling Specifications for SpeCla Parts

TPR (Technical Part Review) Traceability and Lot Control



HSQM-TOC Page 4/4 07/01/2015

Acronyms and Definitions

HSQM Continuous Improvement Flow

Supplier Part Schedule (SPS) Procedure

Main Menu Previous Menu Language Screen

Plant Codes

Country Regulations

China Compulsory Certification (CCC)

Reference


Technical Part Review ______________________________________________________________________________

HSQM-0052

Background The Technical Part Review is an enhanced version of the part maturation

process. The target for these reviews are to reduce the amount of market claims that have resulted from the plant and supplier not properly identifying the critical control points from the designers perspective. The overall concept is to identify all of the critical control points from the design and confirm they have been guaranteed through the suppliers process quality control plan. This can be confirmed through capability studies, poka-yokes in place, QA equipment, etc.

Scope The scope of the Technical Part Review is divided into three phases that

cover the development timeframe of a new model project.

No. Phase Who Objective

1

Design and Process Planning Review

Honda Plant Quality, Supplier, R&D and other support groups

Understand the technology parts and processes Identify part and process change points Review past problem history (PPH) items Understand critical part/CBU characteristics Identify critical control points Develop process control plan

2 Process Maturation Verify critical control points Participate in tool/equipment trials

3

Process Verification and Stabilization

Confirm parts meet specification Confirm process capability Investigate and summarize path forward for any

non-confirming product produced Verify process stability Feedback/countermeasure market concerns

Part Selection Hondas new model management team selects the parts that are evaluated.

Part selection is based on, but not limited to the following criteria: New model part rank New supplier to Honda New technology/feature

New material New manufacturing process New system

High warranty Supplier black box design Suppliers are notified at the beginning of the project if their parts are selected for a technical part review.


Technical Part Review ______________________________________________________________________________

HSQM-0052

Timing and

Reviews At the beginning of each project, the Honda new model team reviews the project schedule and determines the timing for the three phases, and when each review will occur. The Technical Part Review timing aligns with and feeds into the suppliers New Model Review (NMR). A document detailing part number(s) and Technical Part Review specifics for the project will be sent to suppliers selected for TPR activity.

General Activity Details

The following table may be used as a general guideline for new model development activities applied to a part selected for TPR.

TPR Phase 1 2 3

Design & Process Planning Review Process Maturation Process Verification & Stabilization

Cat

egor

y

Des

ign

Stud

y/Pa

rt

Acc

urac

y

Review part DCS, part concept or data/drawing for change points and concerns

Review past development history Design/usage intent CCPs & datum structure Review/Submit CRFs as needed Inspection fixture concept review

Review design changes and CRFs made since TPR-1

Confirm D/C tracking Update CCPs as needed based on any

change points Review event part accuracy Confirm inspection fixture meets

requirements

Review design changes made since TPR-2

Review trial event data and part approval

Confirm inspection fixture meets requirements

Determine MP readiness

Proc

ess

Dev

elop

men

t

DFMEA/FTA > PFMEA correlation Confirm appropriate equipment

controls are planned Review PACV/PPH items Confirm sub-supplier development

requirements and strategy Trial event process and part data plan

All concerns that could not be designed out have process controls in place

PQCT complete & ready for use Confirm PACV items Trial event data requirements are

clear Sub-supplier development on track

Confirm PACV results Confirm PFMEA, PQCT, Operation

Standards, and Actual Process match Confirm process readiness for MP Review sub-supplier development

results

PV T

est

Plan

DV test status and results PV test plan review Joint testing plan in place

Confirm plan still captures all requirements

PV test status and timing review Joint testing status and results

Review PV test results, regulation items, certification reports

If needed, confirm risk assessment details

Joint testing results

Tra

ce-

abili

ty Traceability expectations are clear

Critical data for each process identified

System requirements understood

Traceability system in place Control method meets requirements LNDD complete

Confirm traceability results



HSQM-0010

Background Honda Purchasing and/or Quality groups go through the process of measuring suppliers' quality performance. This process has two parts - forming the ratings and Honda subsequent actions. Note - this is the "Q" rating in Honda's SQCDM process for the maker layout selection process.

Forming the Ratings

The table below shows how the ratings are formed.

Stage Description

1

IPM$ (Index Per Million Dollars of Parts Received) is calculated using this formula Dollar Value of Parts Received = Purchased Value - Honda Supplied Parts Value QIPM$ = Quality Index / Dollar Value of Parts Received X 1,000,000 W$PM$= WRP + CQ + Recall + PUD divided by sales multiplied by 1,000,000

2

Suppliers are grouped into type categories

AP - Assembler/Painter/Processor CA - Casting CC - Complex Component CS - Complex Stamping EL - Electrical F - Fasteners FF Forged/Formed MC - Machining PA - Plastic Appearance PNA - Plastic Non-Appearance R - Rubber SC - Simple Component SS - Simple Stamping ST - Soft Trim

Note Each supplier is assigned a commodity/category by CPG. Each supplier is placed in one category only. The category placement is by the six-digit supplier number.



HSQM-0010

Stage Class Ranking calculation Description

3

QIPM$ Calculate the average QIPM$ for each category Better than half the average - tend to be Class 1 Worse than twice the average - tend to be Class 3 WIPM$ Warranty Index divided by sales multiplied by 1,000,000 Warranty Index class ranking. < half the mean is a class 1, = or > half of mean but

not to exceed 2X mean is a class 2, > two times the mean is a class 3 W$PM$ Warranty dollars recovered (CQ+WRP+ Recall + PUD) divided by sales multiplied

by1,000,000 Warranty $ class ranking. $0 = Class 1, = or < mean Class 2, > mean class 3 Supplier warranty class rank will be the worst of the two, WIPM$ or W$PM$ Note - it is possible for a category to have all suppliers rated as the same class.

4

Honda management reviews the supplier's quality and warranty performance for the last 12 months. Honda senior management may change a supplier's rating based on actual performance (e.g. move from a class 2 to class 3). Performance factors include Failure to meet Minimum Process Requirements (MPR) Response speed Cooperation Total impact Other (e.g. NM development)

5 Purchasing makes final approval of the rating list and distributes to purchasing and quality departments throughout Honda.



HSQM-0010

Honda Subsequent Actions

Honda uses the supplier quality and warranty performance rating information to make decisions to initiate supplier improvement actions. Decisions to initiate actions are based on available information and management judgment. Actions are initiated by individual Honda facilities as appropriate. PH Division also considers Delivered Quality and Warranty supplier class ranking when awarding business. Class 1 - consider primary for additional business Class 2 - consider for continued business. Requires additional

documentation for expanding business. Class 3 - consider for reduction in business. Requires documented

justification for continued or increased business. Negotiate fundamental business system improvements and resources.


Supplier Part Schedule (SPS)

HSQM - Reference

Background Suppliers are responsible to document and communicate NM part development schedules to Honda PH. This is required for all new or changed parts that apply from the launch of a new model.

Responsibilities Honda PH communicates the project requirements to the supplier, coordinates

supplier feedback, evaluates supplier feedback against the NM project targets and negotiates any necessary schedule adjustments. Suppliers complete and submit the schedules according to the requirements.

Two Documents

The SPS is comprised of two documents. Tool Summary Sheet Summarizes the critical path lead time for a purchased part Identifies high level change points to tooling, equipment and process Tracks the impact of each design change on tool maturation - by event Note - Honda PH issues a project specific version of the tool summary sheet for each NM project Gantt Chart Summarizes, in detail, all activities the supplier undertakes to ensure the

timely development of a part Content requirements - The schedule must explain plan vs. actual activity

for each exclusive tool, piece of equipment, process and testing associates with the part. Honda PH provides a summary of development targets via the NMR process. Ideally the supplier's schedule incorporates all the NMR items.

The format is flexible. However, Honda PH suggests suppliers use Microsoft Project to create the Gantt chart.

Timing A completed SPS is due from the supplier to the responsible Honda PH (NM)

contact within 14 calendar days of the tool release Within 14 calendar days of receiving a new drawing or data - in order to

quickly communicate the impact of each design change Once per month after tooling release until the part receives full approval

from Honda PH - in order to report the progress of the part's development


Supplier Part Schedule (SPS)

HSQM - Reference

Tooling Terms The list below explains Honda's tooling terms

Term Explanation

Go 1-1 Honda PH's authorization for the supplier to begin tool design

Go 1-2 Honda PH's authorization for the supplier to purchase long lead raw material for a tool OR to begin rough cutting Go 2-2 Honda PH's authorization for the supplier to begin tool manufacture

MP In part maturation codes this code indicates the part's tooling and production process are MP ready

Related Documents and Activities

The table below lists related documents and activities

Document /

Activity Description

Design Change Instruction Sheet

A document issued with each design change from the Final Prototype Drawing issue that authorizes the supplier to implement a design change within a specified timeframe. The supplier pulls information from the Design Change Instruction Sheet, in order to complete the design change impact to tooling section of the Tool Summary Sheet.

NMR

A process by which Honda PH reviews the development progress of select suppliers to ensure that the project is progressing satisfactorily. Suppliers are selected for reviews based on a calculated part rank. S and A rank part suppliers are required to present a SAP as part of the NMR process.

Start-up Plan

A document issued by Honda PH prior to event order activity that communicates general event requirements and timing. In early development, the supplier uses the delivery date information from the Start-up plan to establish the tool maturation plan, for each event, on the Tool Summary Sheet

Supplier NM Development Status Summary Sheet

A document used in the NMR process to report the suppliers progress for each part against measurable project targets. The targets established on this form for each model drive the SPS Gantt chart content.

Tool Maturation Definitions

A document that explains what tooling and process criteria a part must meet in order to satisfy a specific maturation code (can be found in the appendix of this manual).

Tool Release A process by which Honda PH authorizes suppliers to proceed with tooling and equipment development. The information the supplier provides on the Tool Summary Sheet is used to determine the tool release requirement for each part.

Trial Matrix

A document issued by Honda PH to suppliers during the event order phase to communicate detailed trial event requirements and timing. Later in development, the supplier refers to the Trial Matrix to establish the supplier tool maturation plan for each event, on the Tool Summary Sheet.


This page intentionally left blank


06/03/02HSQM - Reference 1

PROGRESS TRACKINGGANTT CHART

ID Task Name Baseline D Baseline Sta Baseline Fin1 4 DOOR TRIALS 0 wk Wed 8/15 Wed 8/152 2 DOOR TRIALS 0 wk Wed 8/15 Wed 8/153 SPEC. MATURATION 1 wk Wed 8/15 Tue 8/21/4 Design/Specification 1 wk Wed 8/15 Tue 8/215 TOOLING 26 wk Wed 8/15 Tue 2/12/6 Tooling #1 - 2 molds 4 cavity 18.4 wk Wed 8/15 Thu 12/207 Go-1 to Go-2 3 wks Wed 8/15 Tue 9/4/8 Tool design 3 wk Wed 8/15 Tue 9/4/9 Raw Material order 3 wk Wed 8/15 Tue 9/4/10 G0-2 to T1 13.4 wk Wed 9/5/ Thu 12/6/11 Cut Die Holder 25 day Wed 9/5/ Tue 10/912 Cut Electrode 10 day Wed 9/5/ Tue 9/1813 CMM Carbon Electrode 2 day Wed 9/19 Thu 9/2014 EDM Cavity 4 day Fri 9/21/ Wed 9/2615 CMM Cavity 2 day Thu 9/27 Fri 9/28/16 Finish Die cutting ~ Polish / 4 day Mon 10/1 Thu 10/417 Make / install cores and slid 10 day Fri 10/5/ Thu 10/1818 Polish die 6 day Fri 10/19 Fri 10/2619 Install water / electric lines 4 day Mon 10/29 Thu 11/120 Try 1 da Fri 11/2/ Mon 11/521 T1 - T3 2 wks Fri 12/7/ Thu 12/2022 Part Accuracy changes 1 wk Tue 11/6 Mon 11/1223 Process changes 1 wk Tue 11/13 Mon 11/1924 Boat Ship tool from Japan 4 wk Tue 11/20 Mon 12/1725 Set up 1 wk Tue 12/18 Wed 12/1926 Try 2 day Thu 12/20 Thu 12/2027 T-3 to T-4 3.4 wk Mon 1/21/ Tue 2/12/

8/15

8/15

mit CRF

G0-1

G0-2 T1

d/c R4Y-2-1234 Delayed go 2 by 2 weeks.

expedite to make up for late Go-2



T3

T4

EG UF-1 Dankaku QC

29 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 30 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 2 9 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 3 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 30August September October November December January February March April May June Jul

Milestones

Plan vs Actual

% Progress Completion

Task from Job Tree

Example


SpeCla

HSQM-0075 Page 1/4 04/01/15

Purpose Develop tooling that will be used to manufacture appearance parts

Scope Outline the steps required to input essential information and track status

of appearance part tooling maturation.

IS this a SpeClapart?

End of ProcessNo

Complete steps 1-4

Does this part

require texture?

Yes

No End of Process

Yes

Complete steps 5-8 End of Process

Forms Appearance Part Tooling Detail (APTD)

Texture Indication Map (TIM).

Reference Document

Minimum Tooling Specifications for SpeCla Parts.


SpeCla

HSQM-0075 Page 2/4 04/01/15

Step 1 Honda will determine the list of SpeCla parts.

Step 2 For each designated SpeCla part, the supplier must adhere to the Minimum

Tooling Specifications for tooling development. Deviations from the Minimum Tooling Specifications must be negotiated with Honda.

Step 3 Determine if Honda part will require an APTD Form

The drawing and / or Honda will determine if part is a Specla Part that will require the supplier to fill out an APTD.

a) If No Process Complete b) If Yes Supplier / Honda must complete the procedure and

workflow for appearance part development. Submit APTD Document to Honda.

Step 4 Appearance Part Tooling Detail (APTD) Completion

Honda notifies the supplier of specla parts that require an APTD.

The supplier completes the APTD as required and submits to Honda no later than the due date.

Honda quality rep reviews the APTD for the required content and either accepts or rejects the document.

Accept : If the document is accepted, the Honda Quality Rep will sign the document and notify the supplier Reject: If the document is rejected, it will be returned to the supplier with the concerns outlined. The supplier is responsible to update the document with the required changes and resubmit to Honda within 3 working days.

___________________________________________________________________________________________

Step 5 Determine if part will require texture

The drawing and / or Honda will determine if part is a texture part.

a.) If No Process complete b.) If Yes Supplier / Honda must complete the procedure and

workflow for texture development


SpeCla

HSQM-0075 Page 3/4 04/01/15

Step 6

Texture Indication Map Completion Honda notifies the suppliers of texture parts that require a

TextureIndication Map (TIM)

The supplier completes the TIM as required and submits to Honda no later than the due date. Grain orientation is dictated by Honda.

Honda Quality Rep reviews the TIM for the required content and either accepts or rejects.TIM

Accept: If the document is accepted, the Honda Quality Rep will notify the supplier. Reject: If the document is rejected, it will be returned with the concerns outlined and the supplier is responsible to update with the required changes and re-submit to Honda no later than 3 days from the document being rejected.

The supplier provides a T-3 level part and TIM to the specified texture source. The texture source will fill in the detail of the TIM and mark the T-3 part with grain depth and direction per the surface condition drawing or 3D Annotation, and draft analysis. The TIM and marked part are reviewed and approved by Honda, supplier and texture source indicating agreement with content of map and marked part.

Step 7

Texture Go - A T3 part is submitted to Honda to be reviewed for Texture Go . Accept : Honda notifies the supplier the part has texture go. The signed / approved TIM forTexture Go is sent to the tier 1 part who then facilitates the tool texture activity.

Reject: If the T3 part is rejected, the Honda Quality Rep. notifies the supplier with the concern items. The supplier must submit another part with the concerns counter measured to meet the required MP quality maturation level


SpeCla

HSQM-0075 Page 4/4 04/01/15

Step 8

Texture Approval The tool is textured and sample parts are run at rate in the mass production equipment / location. The supplier will submit a T4 Level partfor each cavity for texture approval by Honda Quality rep. The part will also be reviewed at the CBU color / texture / gloss harmony review meeting with Honda Styling associate at Honda Specified event timing.

Accept: If the T4 part is acceptable, then the Honda Quality Rep. will notify the supplier that their part has texture approval with a signed TIM

The approved texture map is sent to the supplier and a copy is put into the part file. Reject: If the T4 part is rejected, the Honda Quality Rep. notifies the supplier with the concern items. The supplier must submit another improved part with the concerns items counter measured to meet the required MP quality maturation level

Note Honda sites may require additional detail.


Specified Action Plan (SAP)

HSQM-0015 Page 1/1 06/03/02

Background The SAP is used to Establish goals Break the goals into tasks or jobs Define when to do the tasks Assign responsibility for completing tasks Track and evaluate progress of each step

Application Although used primarily for New Model development activity the SAP

concept can be used for any activity that requires a schedule to achieve a defined goal. The complexity of the SAP will of course vary from project to project.

Requirement Suppliers are required to create a SAP for each new model project. Based on

part rank and each plants requirements; suppliers may be required to periodically submit the SAP to Honda for review.

Format Honda does not have a specific format for the SAP. Honda does however

require that certain components be a part of whatever new model development process a supplier uses. Goal setting Job tree Progress tracking Organization Evaluation process SAP within the supplier's organization The following pages contain reference material explaining the components of the SAP process.


06/03/02HSQM-0016 1

Components of the Specified Action Plan ProcessJOB TREE: (why, how, what) PROGRESS TRACKING: (what, who, when)

ORGANIZATION:

APQP DEFICIENCY:

EVALUATION PROCESS: SAP WITHIN THE SUPPLIER ORG:

EVIDENCE JUSTIFYING STATUS: VISUAL MANAGEMENT AND REPORTING:

Q

Dev

Del

Model QCDDM

Supplier Goals

Supplier S/A

InterimTargets

ActivityThemes Tasks

Create Gantt chart based on job tree breakdown of tasks:

Plan:

Actual:

T1 T2 T3

T1 T2 T3

Go-2

Go-2

HP LZUAYZ

Honda03M

Eng Qlty Mfg P.C.

Top Mgmt

Project Leader

Resp. Dept.

Resp.Assoc.

Guided by NMR Interim TargetsGuarantee execution of SAPConduct a pre Honda NMR evaluationTop Management evaluate; use P-D-C-A approachDocument supplier top management comments from pre reviewControl Gap; make countermeasure plan; forecast next event situationState readiness to Honda - should not ask Are We Ready?Utilize go/no go judgment criteria at each stage (outside of NMR as well)

Top Management criteria: provide the vision, decision maker, allocates resource, etc.Dedicated New Model resources should be considered if past new model start-up performance did not meet plan

Goals not linked to tasksDoesnt require progress management. Only requires management to milestones.

Wall chart with green, yellow, red status or on-line system Visual mgmt not possible if project mgmt system is only on-lineInvolve all members of new model organization in the report to Honda. Use the expert.

ClearR&R

Daily new model management documents at the supplier should be used for justification of status; or a review of the actual situation.Organized to support an efficient presentation. (not audit style, pre-prepared report style)

Pres/VP

PL

Eng Qlty Mfg PC

Track plan vs actualMonitor % completion

Evaluate at milestones(Interim Targets)

Assoc.

Schedule based on Honda New Model Project requirements

GOAL SETTING:Honda

SQCDDMProject Goals

Supplier previous model reflections

Supplier personalized project goals

SpecificMeasurableAttainableRelevantTime Bound

HondaProject Schedule& Requirements

SAP FORMAT:Honda is not dictating a specific style of SAP, but these components must be part of your project management process.


06/03/02HSQM-0016 2


JOB TREE: (why, how, what) PROGRESS TRACKING: (what, who, when)

ORGANIZATION:

APQP DEFICIENCY:



Q

Dev

Del

Model QCDDM

Supplier Goals

Supplier S/A

InterimTargets



Plan:

Actual:

T1 T2 T3

T1 T2 T3

Go-2

Go-2

HP LZUAYZ

Honda03M

Eng Qlty Mfg P.C.

Top Mgmt

Project Leader

Resp. Dept.

Resp.Assoc.




ClearR&R


Pres/VP

PL

Eng Qlty Mfg PC



Assoc.


Components of the Specified Action Plan ProcessGOAL SETTING:

HondaSQCDDM

Project Goals







06/03/02HSQM-0016 3

Safety Comply with all safety and environmental regulationsSame

Quality Achieve Top of Class IQS II Reduce Warranty Claim occurrence rate

Reduction in IQS related problems 50% Reduction of warranty claim occurrences from 99M Acura TL 0 A Rank Problems 20% Reduction in quality index spikerate increase from 01M Civic 100% Part Approval by sellable units

CostAchieve P2 Cost target(piece price, investment, and expense)

Achieve piece price and investment target Control D/C compensation expense No unplanned cost for Japan Air Freight

DeliveryDevelopment

Meet Trial event requirements Meet MP ramp up plan Meet production lost targets during trial events Meet Maturation and lead-time requirements

100% on time delivery with the correct d/c level No short parts Capacity = 1.2 amortized rate Achieve Event Maturation Targets

Morale Enhance communication Increase Self Reliance Provide training

Establish clear internal and external communication routes Establish clear project roles and responsibilities. Top Management involvement Meet training plans

Project Goals

Honda Goal Supplier GoalSEPA

Supplier Specific Goal


06/03/02HSQM-0016 4

GOAL SETTING:Honda

SQCDDMProject Goals





PURCHASING / SUPPLIER BASIC SCHEDULE

TOOLING MATURATION REQUIREMENTS / AVAILABLE LEADTIME

START-UP PLAN (Trial schedule, quantity, delivery dates, maturation by commodity)

MASS PRODUCTION RAMP-UP PLAN

PQ NMR TIMING FLOW

PQ & SUPPLIER DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY

PQ PARTS APPROVAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

TECHNICAL PART REVIEW STRATEGY

SPECIFICATION / DRAWING MATURATION REQUIREMENTS

NEW MODEL REVIEW ACTIVITY SCHEDULE

NEW MODEL REVIEW INTERIM TARGETS

Inputs from Honda (see documents titled as follows in this packet):

HONDA PROJECT SCHEDULES & REQUIREMENTS - SEPA PROJECT SPECIFIC


06/03/02HSQM-0016 5

SUPPLIER PREVIOUS MODEL REFLECTIONSSITUATION ANALYSIS

Identify Gap

Gather gap items for a specified time period

Perform Why-Why or Cause analysis of gap

Step 1

Step 2

Step 3

Summarize root causes and perform

Why-Why

Step 4

Propose C/M forroot causes

Step 5

Input C/M plan to next new model SAP

Step 6

Gap Avoidance

Sources of Gap

Method

External Feedback*Quality Index*Delivery Index*Past Problem History

Internal Data*Rejects*OEE*Scrap Rate*Rework %*Unplanned Overtime*Expedited freight*Down Time

*Ask WHY until you can no longer answer becauseor What causes (this problem or gap)?

*1st 3 months NM MP*Last fiscal year

*Add tasks to New Modeljob tree

*Analysis why root cause can occur to lead to C/M

*Mgmt check/supportof C/M idea


06/03/02HSQM-0016 6

Problem / Symptom

Why Why Why Why Why Root Cause

Hard

Soft

Important step: To assure the root cause is identified, each why / why box must be supported with quantifiable data.

Individual Problem

Multiple Issues: Take the root cause of several single issues and put them into like categories. Each like category then should have another why/why analysis completed to determine the system issues.

Why Why Why Why Why Root Cause

Hard

Soft

Grouping Like Problems

Define problem from root cause anddevelop improvement themes with a Job tree,

measurable targets, and a SAP

SUPPLIER PREVIOUS MODEL REFLECTIONSRoot Cause Analysis Methods

Why-Why Analysis: An effective tool for identifying a root cause of a single part problem as well as an overall system issue. Each problem is typically a symptom of a deeper rooted problem. The deeper root issues can be discovered by developing a why / why analysis study.


06/03/02HSQM-0016 7

SUPPLIER PERSONALIZED PROJECT GOALSNariyuki

Explain how the goal can be achieved comparing the current situation to the future goal

70%

Efficiency Improvement Plan

+5%

+3%

+2%

Design Improvement

Process Layout Change

Equipment change

+5% 85%

PURPOSE:

Add associate

Each improvement plan item should have an individual action plan

Current Model New ModelTarget Achievement


06/03/02HSQM-0016 8


GOAL SETTING:Honda

SQCDDMProject Goals






ORGANIZATION:

APQP DEFICIENCY:



Q

Dev

Del

Model QCDDM

Supplier Goals

Supplier S/A

InterimTargets



Plan:

Actual:

T1 T2 T3

T1 T2 T3

Go-2

Go-2

HP LZUAYZ

Honda03M

Eng Qlty Mfg P.C.

Top Mgmt

Project Leader

Resp. Dept.

Resp.Assoc.




ClearR&R


Pres/VP

PL

Eng Qlty Mfg PC



Assoc.


Components of the Specified Action Plan Process



06/03/02HSQM-0016 9

GOAL TO TASK LINKBREAKDOWN USING JOB TREE

SUPPLIERGOALS

HONDA N.M.PROJECT GOALS

SUPPLIERSPECIFIC GOALS

DETAILEDTASKS

RESP.PERSON

RESP.DEPT.

Purpose of aJob Tree

1. To expand thinking from theoretical planning to specific actions.

2. To illustrate the real level of complexity necessary to achieve a goal.

3. To check the logic and completeness of a plan at all levels.

4. To link detailed tasks to high level goals.

5. To clearly assign responsibility for tasks that contribute to the achievement of the goal.

6. To gain ownership from team members through creation of the tree.


06/03/02HSQM-0016 10


GOAL SETTING:Honda

SQCDDMProject Goals






ORGANIZATION:

APQP DEFICIENCY:



Q

Dev

Del

Model QCDDM

Supplier Goals

Supplier S/A

InterimTargets



Plan:

Actual:

T1 T2 T3

T1 T2 T3

Go-2

Go-2

HP LZUAYZ

Honda03M

Eng Qlty Mfg P.C.

Top Mgmt

Project Leader

Resp. Dept.

Resp.Assoc.




ClearR&R


Pres/VP

PL

Eng Qlty Mfg PC



Assoc.


Components of the Specified Action Plan Process



06/03/02HSQM-0016 11

Supplier Specific Goals

Supplier Goals

(Interim Target)

Task Resp.Person

Resp.Dept.

Task Resp.Person

Resp.Dept.

Schedule

Management review of progress*

Project Goals

LINK GOALS TO SPECIFIC TASKS AND SCHEDULE

GOAL TO TASK LINK WITH SCHEDULE


06/03/02HSQM-0016 12

PROGRESS TRACKINGGANTT CHART

ID Task Name Baseline D Baseline Sta Baseline Fin1 4 DOOR TRIALS 0 wk Wed 8/15 Wed 8/152 2 DOOR TRIALS 0 wk Wed 8/15 Wed 8/153 SPEC. MATURATION 1 wk Wed 8/15 Tue 8/21/4 Design/Specification 1 wk Wed 8/15 Tue 8/215 TOOLING 26 wk Wed 8/15 Tue 2/12/6 Tooling #1 - 2 molds 4 cavity 18.4 wk Wed 8/15 Thu 12/207 Go-1 to Go-2 3 wks Wed 8/15 Tue 9/4/8 Tool design 3 wk Wed 8/15 Tue 9/4/9 Raw Material order 3 wk Wed 8/15 Tue 9/4/10 G0-2 to T1 13.4 wk Wed 9/5/ Thu 12/6/11 Cut Die Holder 25 day Wed 9/5/ Tue 10/912 Cut Electrode 10 day Wed 9/5/ Tue 9/1813 CMM Carbon Electrode 2 day Wed 9/19 Thu 9/2014 EDM Cavity 4 day Fri 9/21/ Wed 9/2615 CMM Cavity 2 day Thu 9/27 Fri 9/28/16 Finish Die cutting ~ Polish / 4 day Mon 10/1 Thu 10/417 Make / install cores and slid 10 day Fri 10/5/ Thu 10/1818 Polish die 6 day Fri 10/19 Fri 10/2619 Install water / electric lines 4 day Mon 10/29 Thu 11/120 Try 1 da Fri 11/2/ Mon 11/521 T1 - T3 2 wks Fri 12/7/ Thu 12/2022 Part Accuracy changes 1 wk Tue 11/6 Mon 11/1223 Process changes 1 wk Tue 11/13 Mon 11/1924 Boat Ship tool from Japan 4 wk Tue 11/20 Mon 12/1725 Set up 1 wk Tue 12/18 Wed 12/1926 Try 2 day Thu 12/20 Thu 12/2027 T-3 to T-4 3.4 wk Mon 1/21/ Tue 2/12/

8/15

8/15

mit CRF

G0-1

G0-2 T1

d/c R4Y-2-1234 Delayed go 2 by 2 weeks.




T3

T4

EG UF-1 Dankaku QC

29 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 30 7 14 21 28 4 11 18 25 2 9 16 23 30 6 13 20 27 3 10 17 24 3 10 17 24 31 7 14 21 28 5 12 19 26 2 9 16 23 30August September October November December January February March April May June Jul

Milestones

Plan vs Actual

% Progress Completion

Task from Job Tree

*A Gantt Chart without a job tree will not suffice as an SAP.


06/03/02HSQM-0016 13

LINK SUPPLIER GANTT TO HONDA NEW MODEL DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE

Tool

ing

Go

Tim

ing

Des

ign

Mat

urat

ion

Tim

ing

Tria

l Eve

nt P

arts

PV T

estin

g

Supplier Specified Action Plan must correlate with Honda New Model Development Schedule N

MR

Pla

n

Specification Maturation

Tooling Leadtime Negotiation

Supplier trial parts manufacturing plan

PV Test planStart/StopNew Model

Review

Honda R&D Development Lots

Honda Mfg. Trial Lots

HONDA GENERAL SCHEDULE

SUPPLIER ACTIVITY SCHEDULE


06/03/02HSQM-0016 14


GOAL SETTING:Honda

SQCDDMProject Goals





PROGRESS TRACKING: (what, who, when)Create Gantt chart based on job tree breakdown of

tasks:

Plan:

Actual:

T1 T2 T3

T1 T2 T3

Go-2

Go-2




Components of the Specified Action Plan ProcessJOB TREE: (why, how, what)

ORGANIZATION:

APQP DEFICIENCY:



Q

Dev

Del

Model QCDDM

Supplier Goals

Supplier S/A

InterimTargets


HP LZUAYZ

Honda03M

Eng Qlty Mfg P.C.

Top Mgmt

Project Leader

Resp. Dept.

Resp.Assoc.




ClearR&R


Pres/VP

PL

Eng Qlty Mfg PC

Assoc.



06/03/02HSQM-0016 15

ORGANIZATIONORGANIZATION

* Clearly defined & documented organization by project* Roles and Responsibilities defined & documented* All members of the team identified* Defined reporting flow* Top Management participation:

Agrees with the project plan Planned periodic reviews with evaluation purpose

ORGANIZATION

Pres/VP

Project Manager

Quality Engineering Manufacturing Prod. Control Design Overseas Support

Specific Individual Associate Names


06/03/02HSQM-0016 16


GOAL SETTING:Honda

SQCDDMProject Goals






tasks:

Plan:

Actual:

T1 T2 T3

T1 T2 T3

Go-2

Go-2





ORGANIZATION:

APQP DEFICIENCY:

SAP WITHIN THE SUPPLIER ORG:


Q

Dev

Del

Model QCDDM

Supplier Goals

Supplier S/A

InterimTargets


HP LZUAYZ

Honda03M

Eng Qlty Mfg P.C.

Top Mgmt

Project Leader

Resp. Dept.

Resp.Assoc.




ClearR&R


Pres/VP

PL

Eng Qlty Mfg PC

Assoc.

EVALUATION PROCESS:Guided by NMR Interim TargetsGuarantee execution of SAPConduct a pre Honda NMR evaluationTop Management evaluate; use P-D-C-A approachDocument supplier top management comments from pre reviewControl Gap; make countermeasure plan; forecast next event situationState readiness to Honda - should not ask Are We Ready?Utilize go/no go judgment criteria at each stage (outside of NMR as well)


06/03/02HSQM-0016 17

SUPPLIER INTERNAL NEW MODEL EVALUATION PROCESSHonda is not checking all aspects of a suppliers preparation. Based on the potential impact to trials and MP, Honda is prioritizingthe items and the depth of the review. The supplier must evaluate all of the items that Honda is not reviewing.

NMR Check Points

Supplier evaluation

Items

Planning E0 E1 E2 E3

Supplier Top Mgmt Evaluation

With defined judgment items and criteria

Trial~MP Go / No Go judgment

Desig

n/Spe

cifica

tion

Tool

Leve

l

Inspe

ction

Fixtu

reMa

chine

Manu

factur

ing Fi

xture

In-lin

e QA

Devic

e

Maint

enan

ceRe

pair

EPA

Perm

its

Build

Ass

ociat

e/Man

powe

r

Prod

uctio

n Mate

rial

Hand

work

Line S

peed

/Cyc

le Tim

e

Asso

ciate

Train

ing

PFME

APQ

CTLo

t Con

trol

Even

t Part

Acc

uracy

Even

t Part

Des

ign Le

vel

Hond

a Situ

ation

Con

firmati

on

Prod

uct V

alida

tion T

estin

g

Bill o

f Mate

rial

Pack

aging

Sub-s

uppli

er Re

adine

ss

Deliv

erySa

fety/E

rgono

mics

Cost

Moral

eOt

her

Depth of

Review


06/03/02HSQM-0016 18

SUPPLIER TRIAL EVENT GO / NO GO JUDGMENT CHECKSHEET (Example)TRIAL

DANKAKU QC VC 200 PC / 2 HPLAN/ FORE- Top Mgmt PLAN/ FORE- Top Mgmt PLAN/ FORE- Top Mgmt PLAN/ FORE-

CAT. ITEM REQ'T CAST ACTUAL GAP Judgment REQ'T CAST ACTUAL GAP Judgment REQ'T CAST ACTUAL GAP Judgment REQ'T CAST ACTUAL

Safety Eqpt "interlocks" O

Quality Part Maturation O Raw Material O PPA or MP parts (I/H parts) O Prod. Location O N.A. Jpn JpnO/S parts PPAP/receiving inspection results OScrap Rate O OReject Rate O ODesign Change No. OPQCT-Process Status OPart Accuracy OHandwork/part OInspection Fixture OColor Match OLot Control/FIFO OTest Results OQA Machine-Dummy/Pole Yoke parts fix OCpK OFMEA re-check w/CpK O

Development OEE/Cycle Time ODowntime Plan (production schedule adjusted) O

Delivery Packaging Available OTier 2 (dom.) parts rec'd OHAM DSPS / JSP rec'd ODelivery plan (ttl sch. clear) O

CostHAM trial piece price fixed OTier-2 fixed Oexpedite expense O

Mgmt Associate Training OManpower (MP vs NM) O

OtherCustomer P.O. vs run plan clear OProblem Tracking Chart (PTC) O System ready O Last trial PTC status OBOM Accuracy O

MfgFinal Assy plan (on/off-line) OOperation Standards complete (to req'd level) O

Inpu

t

Dur

ing

Out

put

TOP MANAGEMENT SHOULD JUDGE GO / NO GO BEFORE EACH KEY ACTIVITY.

THE JUDGMENT CRITERIA SHOULD BE COMMUNICATED TO THE TEAM IN ADVANCE.

THE TREND SHOULD BE TRACKED FROM EVENT TO EVENT AND RESOURCES ALLOCATED

APPROPRIATELY TO GUARANTEE A SMOOTH MP START UP.

THE PROJECT TEAM SHOULD ACTIVELY MANAGE TRIAL EVENT GAP ITEMS AND THEIR

COUNTERMEASURES.


06/03/02HSQM-0016 19

GOAL SETTING:Honda

SQCDDMProject Goals






tasks:

Plan:

Actual:

T1 T2 T3

T1 T2 T3

Go-2

Go-2





ORGANIZATION:

APQP DEFICIENCY:



Q

Dev

Del

Model QCDDM

Supplier Goals

Supplier S/A

InterimTargets


HP LZUAYZ

Honda03M

Eng Qlty Mfg P.C.

Top Mgmt

Project Leader

Resp. Dept.

Resp.Assoc.




ClearR&R


Pres/VP

PL

Eng Qlty Mfg PC

Assoc.




06/03/02HSQM-0016 20

LEVELS OF A SPECIFIED ACTION PLANLEVELS OF A SPECIFIED ACTION PLAN

ALL NEW MODEL Top Mgmt

CONTROLLEVEL

FY 2003Link to Corporate Business Plan

03M AccordEACH PROJECT

EACH DEPT

EACH GROUP/ASSOC.

Project Mgr

Dept Mgr

Report to HONDA

Eng PC

Qlty Mfg

DEEPER BREAKDOWN

OF TASKS


06/03/02HSQM-0016 21

SAP FORMATSAP FORMATMONTH 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 2 3 4

START-UP SCHEDULE

ZONE PURPOSE TARGET METHOD RESP. SCHEDULE / METHOD

CM/L SETTING

* M/L FIX BY P2 * M/L SET WITHIN 10 DAYS OF DWG ISSUE * NO SHORT / LATE PARTS DUE TO M/L DELAY

* BOM MATURATION SYSTEM (EXCL) * M/L SETTING SHEET TRACKING SYSTEM

* TEAM CONSENSUS OF M/L DECISION PRIOR TO GO RELEASE

* (NEW ) M/L REVIEW MEETING * NEW SUPPLIER QAV

* CPG * PH/PQ

QTOOL &

EQUIPMENT MATURATION

* TOOL / PROCESS MATURATION TARGETS MET

* DESIGN FIX PLANNING MEETING * ONE PACK / GO RELEASE PROCEDURES * (REV) SUPPLIER PART SCHEDULE * PH MAINFRAME TOOLING TRACKING SYSTEMS

PROCESS MATURATION

* TOOL / PROCESS MATURATION TARGETS MET

* QUALITY STANDARD * FMEA * PQCT * LNDD * PROCESS INSPECTION STANDARD

M/L SETTING, RFQ

4DR

C1DEVELOPMENT

SCHEDULE

FIX CHANGE PTS. , MANAGE PENDING ITEMS

LIN

E 1

4 D

OO

R

4DR DRW FPD MPD

DAN- 1(T1)

W/B (4 DOOR)

SET GO PLAN

B RANK

S-J

T- 1 T- 3T- 2

SE

LT

FIX

DAN- 1 DAN- 2

C RANK

C1

P2

E- 1E- 0

STUDY

* CPG

* NMDADVANCE

IMAGE QC VC / PP / MP

M/L REVIEW MTGS / NEW SUPPLIER QAV

TEXTURE

A RANK

PENDING GO MTGS

* TEAM

* NMD

* NMD

* NMD

* S/D

* S/D

B RANK T- 1 T- 2

C RANK

A RANK

T- 3

COMPLETE BY GO

COMPLETE BY EVENT

* PAST PROBLEM C/M CONFRMED* QUALITY STANDARD ISSUED* QA EQUIPMENT PLAN COMPLETE* INSPECTION FIXTURE CONCEPT COMPLETE* LOT CONTROL REQ'T DECIDED

* PFMEA APPROVED* PQCT DRAFT COMPLETE* INSPECTION FIXTURE ACCURACY VERIFIED* INSPECTION DATA SHEET APPROVED* LNDD DOCS. COMPLETE* PROCESS INSPECTION STD COMPLETE* SUPPLIER TRAINING PLAN CONFIRMED

* PQCT CONFIRMED TO PROC* QA EQUIPMENT CONFIRMED* CONFIRM PART ACCURACY* CONFIRM LOT CONTROL AT * SUPPLIER HIRING / TRAININGCONFIRMED* PTC/QSS C/M COMPLETE* PROCESS CAPABILITY CONF* OPS STD VERIFIED* SAMPLING PLAN COMPLETE* REPAIR PLAN COMPLETE

* AQ* PQ* PQ* PQ* PQ

* PQ* PH* NMD

Honda schedule

High level goal

Q,C,D,D,MSpecific Target

Project reviews

Task milestones

Responsible individual/dept

(SAP or JobTree)

NMR gap worksheet(s) will be used by the supplier to summarize project status during periodic reviews with

Honda

Milestones should match Honda interim

target timingDetailed Tasks

(EXAMPLE)


06/03/02HSQM-0016 22

Interactive Assessment of the SAPInteractive Assessment of the SAP

COLLECT INFO.

COMMON STRATEGY AND INFO INTO S.A.P., JAPAN & U.S.COMMON STRATEGY AND INFO INTO S.A.P., JAPAN & U.S.COMMUNICATION REINFORCEMENT BETWEEN MOTHER & DAUGHTER SUPPLIER.COMMUNICATION REINFORCEMENT BETWEEN MOTHER & DAUGHTER SUPPLIER.

Tool development issues Process Plans Quality Plans

Manufacturing Capabilities / Constraints Past Problem Concerns Unique N.A. Characteristics


06/03/02HSQM-0016 23

GOAL SETTING:Honda

SQCDDMProject Goals






tasks:

Plan:

Actual:

T1 T2 T3

T1 T2 T3

Go-2

Go-2





ORGANIZATION:

APQP DEFICIENCY:



Q

Dev

Del

Model QCDDM

Supplier Goals

Supplier S/A

InterimTargets


HP LZUAYZ

Honda03M

Eng Qlty Mfg P.C.

Top Mgmt

Project Leader

Resp. Dept.

Resp.Assoc.




ClearR&R


Pres/VP

PL

Eng Qlty Mfg PC

Assoc.




Honda Supplier Quality Manual Revision Information List Content Revision 04/01/2016 Issued by North American Supplier QD

Revision Information Page1/1 04/01/2016

The Honda Supplier Quality Manual applies to all North American Honda plants and their suppliers. Controlled Documents

Document Name Control Number Approval Date Change Description

Index System HSQM-0008 04/01/2016 INI Reports Update Bar Code Standard HSQM-0030 04/01/2016 2D, QR & Linear Updates Controlled Containment HSQM-0061 04/01/2016 Under Honda actions: Changed holds to hold Minimum Process Requirements Procedure HSQM-0060 04/01/2016 Revised E1 & E2 to PA2, PA3, PA4 or PA5 PV Testing Risk Analysis Procedure HSQM-0071 04/01/2016 Revised E1 to PA3/PA4, E2 to PA5 Process Assurance Capability Verification (PAC-V) HSQM-0094 04/01/2016 CpK changed to PpK Minimum Process Requirements Part Marking Check Sheet HSQM-0114 04/01/2016 DPM Update Minimum Process Requirements Leak Test Check Sheet HSQM-0123 04/01/2016 Initial Issue Plant Codes HSQM-Ref. 04/01/2016 Added PMC & RLC


This page intentionally left blank


Quality Control Regulations and Minimum Quality System Requirements __________________________________________________________________

HSQM-0002 1/17

This manual applies to the following North American … Automotive_20cb1.… · Supplier Quality...

Documents

Transcript of This manual applies to the following North American … Automotive_20cb1.… · Supplier Quality...