This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives ... · The Honorable Pete V. Domenci 434...

4
This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas. http://dolearchives.ku.edu Page 1 of 4 Same letter sent to Seoator Dole, the bill's chief sponso r GlEORGlE Slf'IElEILIE A.SSOCJIA. TIES September 20, 1985 The Honorable Robert Dole 141 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 The Honorable Pete V. Domenci 434 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510 RE: S. 1233, Laboratory Animal Bill Dear Senator Domenci: The American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums (AAZPA) represents virtually every major zoological park, aquarium, wildlife park and oceanari urn on the North A:neri can continent and the vast majority of the professional staff members employed therein. Collectively, zoos and aquariums in this country annually play host to more than 100,000,000 visitors. Among other goals, AAZPA \'las established to aid, foster and engage in the exchange of zoological specimens for exhibition, conservation, scientific and presentation purposes, and to cooperate with governmental agencies for the heillth ilnd welfare of animals. As is clear, from this mission statement, AAZPA acknowledges and respects the public's concern for the protection of domestic and non-dome stic animal life. We support the intent of S. 1233 to prot ect the welfare of animals and to ensure humane treatment, care and appropriate use of 1 aboratory animals. We also believe in the utilization of alternative methods, where possible, to the use of live animals in research and testing. We have several questions about definitions in the bill. Is it the intent of S. 1233 to amend the Animal He lfare Act to include zoological facilities as research facilities in all cases? Zoological facilities are 1i censed as ex hi bi tors and thus are inspected by the Department of Agriculture to insure compliance with the standards of the Animal Welfare Act. Independently, the Anima 1 He lfare Act a 1 so requires registration and inspection of research facilities. Our concern is founded on the lack of a definition for the term "research" and on the definition of "Federal av1ard" which includes cooperative agreements, loans and contracts. Many zoological institutions are involved in cooperative aqreements, loans and contracts with Federal agencies. The majority of these are initiated by Federal authorities (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Customs Service, Fish and Wildlife Service and tlational 1ilrine Fisheries Service) for th e purpose of placing confiscated, beached, stranded, sick, injured, or orphaned wildlife under the professional care of a zoological institution and its staff. Would these cooperative agr e eme nts, loans and contracts be c lassified as Fede ral awards? 1110 Vermont Av enu e, N .W . Suite 11 60 Wa shin gto n, D.C. 20 00 5 !20 2) 429-0 94

Transcript of This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives ... · The Honorable Pete V. Domenci 434...

This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas. http://dolearchives.ku.edu

Page 1 of 4

Same letter sent to Seoator Dole, the bill's chief sponso r

GlEORGlE Slf'IElEILIE A.SSOCJIA. TIES

September 20, 1985 The Honorable Robert Dole 141 Hart Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510

The Honorable Pete V. Domenci 434 Dirksen Senate Office Building Washington, DC 20510

RE: S. 1233, Laboratory Animal Bill

Dear Senator Domenci:

The American Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums (AAZPA) represents virtually every major zoological park, aquarium, wildlife park and oceanari urn on the North A:neri can continent and the vast majority of the professional staff members employed therein. Collectively, zoos and aquariums in this country annually play host to more than 100,000,000 visitors.

Among other goals, AAZPA \'las established to aid, foster and engage in the exchange of zoological specimens for exhibition, conservation, scientific and presentation purposes, and to cooperate with governmental agencies for the heillth ilnd welfare of animals. As is clear, from this mission statement, AAZPA acknowledges and respects the public's concern for the protection of domestic and non-domestic animal life.

We support the intent of S. 1233 to protect the welfare of animals and to ensure humane treatment, care and appropriate use of 1 aboratory animals. We also believe in the utilization of alternative methods, where possible, to the use of live animals in research and testing.

We have several questions about definitions in the bill. Is it the intent of S. 1233 to amend the Animal He lfare Act to include zoological facilities as research facilities in all cases? Zoological facilities are 1 i censed as ex hi bi tors and thus are inspected by the Department of Agriculture to insure compliance with the standards of the Animal Welfare Act. Independently, the Anima 1 He lfare Ac t a 1 so requires registration and inspection of research facilities.

Our concern is founded on the lack of a definition for the term "research" and on the definition of "Federal av1ard" which includes cooperative agreements, loans and contracts. Many zoological institutions are involved in cooperative aqreements, loans and contracts with Federal agencies. The majority of these are initiated by Federal authorities (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Customs Service, Fish and Wildlife Service and tlational i·1ilrine Fisheries Service) for the purpose of placing confiscated, beached, stranded, sick, injured, or orphaned wildlife under the professional care of a zoological institution and its staff. Would these cooperative agreements, loans and contracts be c lassified as Fede ral awards?

1110 Vermont Avenue, N .W . Suite 11 60 Washington , D .C. 20005 !202 ) 4 29-0 94

This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas. http://dolearchives.ku.edu

Page 2 of 4

If they are, then are routine veterinary care, preventative medicine programs and reproductive husbandry techniques classified as research? Generally, research conducted by the zoological co11111unity with regard to wildlife is intended to enhance the propagation, survival or ~onservation of all wildlife.

In addition, we wonder if the permitting systems established by the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the Endangered Species Act and the t4igratory Bird Treaty Act are to be included as a "Federal .award"? Under the permitting regulations pursuant to each of these laws, an applicant applies to the appropriate Federal agency for a specific permit. These permits require compliance with humane care, handling, and transportation regulations promulgated pursuant to these statutes.

We urge that the term research facility not be broadened to include zoological institutions unless they receive Federal funding to conduct specific research as part of a Federal grant or unless they are already classified by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service as research faci 1 i ties as well as ex hi bi tors. He have included some report 1 anguage and request that it be considered.

Thank you for considering the Zoological Parks and Aquariums. information.

Sincerely,

Kr stin L. Vehrs W shington Representative

erican Association of Zoological Parks and Aquariums

Enclosure KLV/vt

views of the American Association of I \'loul d be pleased to provide further

This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas. http://dolearchives.ku.edu

Page 3 of 4

. BOB DOLE

KANSAS 60 3062 1/1 ~nittd £'tatts £'matt

STANDING COMMITTEES:

AGRICULTURE, NUTRITION, AND FORESTRY

FINANCE

E. L. Blakely Director

WASHINGTON, DC 20510

January 13, 1986

Sedgwick County Zoological Society 5555 Zoo Boulevard Wichita, Kansas 67212

Dear Mr. Blakely:

RULES

I appreciated hearing from you regarding my efforts to improve the treatment of laboratory research animals.

I also appreciated having your thoughts on an exemption for zoos in the bill and, as you may know, that exemption has been included in the bill language.

After three years of work on laboratory animals legislation, it is a pleasure to report that my "Improved Standards for Laboratory Animals Act" has been approved by Congress as part of the recently-passed 1985 farm bill . The merits of this measure have been recognized by legislators and animal rights supporters from across the country and I join them in their hope that unnecessary abuses in the care of research animals will finally be ended.

I am enclosing, for your review, copies of the animal welfare provisions of the farm bill and the appropriate conference committee explanation which accompanies the bill language. Thank you again and best wishes for the new year.

BD:lm Enclosures

Sincerely yours,

BOB DOLE United States Senate

This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas. http://dolearchives.ku.edu

Page 4 of 4

N ... "'

w 0

0 ()

< w a: <

(/)

< (/)

z < :.::

< 1-

I ()

• 0 a: < > w ...J

::::l

0 aJ

0 0 N

ll)

ll)

ll)

ll)

SEDGWICK COUNTY ZOOLOG ICAL SOCIETY

October 21 , 1985

The Honorable Robert Dole 141 Hart Senate Office Building lvashington DC 20510

RE: ~. 12,, Laboratory Animal Bill

Dear Senator Dole:

In reference to the above - mentioned bill I have attached a copy of a letter to Senator Domenci -..-1hich states, in better words than I can manage, my concerns as a professional. I realize you have already received this attachment.

~n1ile zoos do list "scientific investigation" as one of their purposes, very few of us have either the staff or the money to carry this activity to any significant len8th. Indeed, and this is most inportant, -..Je have a strong and clearly written Code of Ethics and Animal Disposition Policy that goes to great lengths to see that animals from zoos do not end up in situations where they may be subject to invasive research. Our activities -.;-vhich might be loosely termed "research" are limited to behav­ioral observations and advances in such areas as im?roved nutrition and husbandry.

I earnestly hope that in the eyes of this Bill we are not lumped into the sane category as research institutions. Abuses by such institutions and consequent regulation to prevent abuses do not categorically apply to zoos . Zoos are at present, strongly regulated b y not only our professional organization (American Association of Zoolo g ical Parks & Aquariums) but also by several federal a gencies.

Your consideration of this and the attached will be greatly appreciated. I might add that questions you might have can be addressed to me or to Robert Wa gner , Executive Director, AAZPA , Ogleb a y Pa rk , ~-Jheeling HV 26003, telephone (304) 242-2160 •

The huge Great Plains Grizzly reigned supreme in this area before the coming of white man. Capable of preying upon full grown bison, this magmficent creature and his fellow plains dweller, the Indian, treated each other with respect. The fearlessness of the bear made him vulnerable to the white man's guns and he was probably the first wild am mal to be exterminated in Kansas. We have used his footprint to remind us that he is no more, and that the bear family is an endangered group the world over. The outline of the Sedgwick County Zoo encloses the print to indicate that zoos are often the last refuge that an ever-increasing human population will allow the vanishing wildlife of the world .