FINAL YEAR PROJECT 1KMK 3103

SEMESTER 1 2013/2014

SYNOPSIS

This course introduces students on how to write and prepare a research proposal in a systematic manner. A student proposes or selects a project after discussion and approval of his or her supervisor. Usually, a project is based on a core subject of a program. Although projects may differ between students, students get the same exposure and training when they plan and prepare their research proposal. Discussions with supervisor, presentation of research proposal and writing a research proposal are methods used to meet the learning objectives of this course.

OBJECTIVE

By the end of this course, students will be able to:1. Produce a research proposal which include Chapters One,

Two and Three for a topic area in Cognitive Science, with clear discussions about sections of the chapters such as background, problem statements, research questions, hypotheses, conceptual framework, theories and models, previous research, research articles, research designs, techniques of data collection, sampling, validity and reliability issues and data analysis.

2. Explain and communicate with lecturers and relevant parties about the study, and search at libraries, resource centers, on-line and other sources for relevant information in order to plan about instrument, module, system design or product design that will be developed.

3. Demonstrate the previous research and methodology through individual presentation

TYPE OF PROJECT

1. Common research Quantitative, qualitative or mix

2. System Design and Development 3. Prototype/Product Design 4. Other project type approved by

supervisor

YOUR PLANNING

Early literature survey and review in related field of research

Early meeting and discussion with potential supervisor In a respective semester, at least 6 meetings with supervisor

log book

Individual time management At least 3 hours/week

Data collection Public/private Supervisor’s responsible (letter, communication, etc.)

ASSESSMENT

Report (Chap 1,2,3) = 80%

Presentation = 15%

Aptitude = 5% + log book

Grading (A… C), Above 50%

REPORT (80%)No Criteria % Descriptors1 Adherence to Format & Layout

* Citation & References* Language* Coherence

10

Impressive (10)Good (7 – 9)

Satisfactory (5 – 6)Fair (3 – 4)

Weak (0 – 2)2 Introduction (Chapter 1)

* Background/Context* Problem Statement* Objectives & Research Questions (Hypotheses) * Conceptual Framework* Conceptual & Operational Definitions of Key Terms/Concepts* Significance of Study

30

Impressive (25 - 30)Good (18 – 24)

Satisfactory (12– 17)Fair (6 – 11)Weak (0 – 5)

3 Review of Related Literature (Chapter 2)* Coverage (Breadth & Depth)* Quality of Review (Relevance, Logical Argument)* Theoretical Framework

30

Impressive (25 - 30)Good (18 – 24)

Satisfactory (12– 17)Fair (6 – 11)Weak (0 – 5)

4 Research Design (Chapter 3)* Conceptual Framework* Sampling Procedure* Instrumentation* Reliability & Validity* Procedures for Data Collection & Analysis* Limitations/Delimitations

30

Impressive (25 - 30)Good (18 – 24)

Satisfactory (12– 17)Fair (6 – 11)Weak (0 – 5)

Impressive Good Satisfactory Fair WeakExceptionally clear presentation; all major points sufficiently addressed; very thorough and comprehensive; exemplary work

Clear presentation; almost all major points sufficiently addressed; generally thorough and comprehensive

Generally acceptable, some points sufficiently addressed and some need minor improvement.

May require major revision; include substantial and consistent errors.

Require major revision in almost all major points; include very substantial and consistent error; fail to provide clear presentation.

PRESENTATION (15%)No

CriteriaPoin

tsDescriptors

1 Background of Study/Project Proposed Introduction to topic/area of

investigation (i.e. problem statement, scope of study/project)

Explanation of the purpose of the study/project (i.e. objectives, research questions, hypotheses, potential findings/significance of study, conceptual framework, etc)

Definition of Key Terms/Constructs

9

Impressive (9)Good (6-8)

Satisfactory (4-5)Fair (2-3)

Weak (0 – 1)

2 Related Literature Review of related studies/literature

on area of study/project proposed (i.e. theoretical framework)

9

Impressive (9)Good (6-8)

Satisfactory (4-5)Fair (2-3)

Weak (0 – 1)3 Methodology*

Explanation on method & methodology proposed to achieve purpose/objective of study (i.e. research design, sampling, instrumentation, methods of data collection, data analysis, etc)

(* Based on type of FYP proposed)

9

Impressive (9)Good (6-8)

Satisfactory (4-5)Fair (2-3)

Weak (0 – 1)

4 Oral Presentation Engages attention throughout Well-paced, clear articulation Exhibit confidence, enthusiasm

3Impressive (3)Satisfactory (2)

Weak (0 – 1)

APTITUDE (5%)

Criteria

Exhibit understanding of and capability to undertake the FYP process Demonstrate commitment and determination to complete the FYP successfully Demonstrate capacity for higher order thinking when articulating ideas during

consultation sessions Demonstrate good progress from the beginning of the PTA process

FLOW CHARTMinggu/Tarikh Aktiviti Tindakan

Pembahagian Pelajar-Penyelia Taklimat tentang Prosedur PTA &

Tanggungjawab Pelajar Penyelaras PTA Program

Minggu 1-13 Sesi Penyeliaan: Perjumpaan secara berkala bersama Penyelia

Penulisan Draf PTA 1: Bab 1,2 & 3Pelajar & Penyelia

Minggu 13-14 Seminar Pembentangan PTA 1: Bab 1, 2 & 3 Penyelaras PTA Program,

Pelajar & Penyelia

Minggu 13-16 Penambahbaikan Penulisan PTA 1 (berdasarkan maklumbalas semasa Seminar)

Penulisan Draf Akhir PTA 1 mengikut format yang telah ditetapkan

Pelajar & Penyelia

Minggu 17 Penghantaran PTA 1 ke Pejabat AM FSKPM (jumlah Bab bagi PTA 1 bergantung kepada jenis projek yang dipilih)

*PTA 1 yang dihantar selepas tarikh ini akan diberikan Gred F

PelajarPejabat Am (PP)

Minggu 18 Pemberian Gred kepada Penyelaras PTA Program

Pemaparan Gred pada Papan Notis dan laman web Fakulti (e-markah)

Penyelia

FYP RESEARCH AREA

What? How? When? Where?

COGNITIVE SCIENCE

Cognitive Psychology

Intelligent System

Human Factors

Learning Sciences

Cognitive Neuroscience

Artificial Intelligence

Cognitive Ergonomic

Design-Based Research

Philosophy of Mind

Augmented Reality

Physical Ergonomic

Novice vs Expert learning processors

Virtual Reality Human Computer Interaction

Design Development

21st Century learning

Integration of Teaching to support learning

ANNOUNCEMENT

MORPHEUS Manual Penyediaan Projek Tahun Akhir FSKPM

Key PTA @FSKPM

List of title/area according to cluster

Title/research area Submission date of title/research area before 5PM, 2 MAY 2013 (SELASA)

FYP title/research area form

FYP 2 presentation (13 May – 16 May 2013) Please refer to the schedule at Morpheus/faculty website

Contact

Wan Norizan Wan Hashim Email :

whnoriza@fcs.unimas.my Ext : 1508

THANK YOU