Think Function, Not Form - Investment Revie › files › 2012 › 04 › ...Cromwell.pdf ·...
Transcript of Think Function, Not Form - Investment Revie › files › 2012 › 04 › ...Cromwell.pdf ·...
1309813_3
Think Function, Not Form
Wendy M. Cromwell, CFA, Director of Strategic Asset Allocation
Wellington Management Company, LLP
®
The Challenge
Agenda
Balancing Risk Exposures – Helpful Tools
Case Study
2309813_3
Challenges with Traditional Asset Allocation
Rolling 12-Month Return in CAD, January 1974 – February 2012 (%)
Correlation = 0.95Correlation 0.95
*66.7% MSCI World/33.3% MSCI Canada**1980 – 2012 50% DEX Core Bond/50% DEX Long Bond, 1973 – 1979 DEX Long Bond Sources: MSCI, DEX, Wellington Management
Challenges with Traditional Asset Allocation
Percent Over-reliant on equities
Equities driven by one type of economic environment
Actual results may differ significantly from projections
3309813_3
GlobalEconomic Environments Over Time
Global GDP and Inflation, Y/Y % Change with Market Environment Time Periods
Data: 1972 – 2011Sources: Datastream, Wellington Management
CanadaEconomic Environments Over Time
Canada GDP and Inflation, Y/Y % Chg with Market Environment Time Periods
Data: 1972 – 2011Sources: Datastream, Wellington Management
4309813_3
Most investors define investment policy by asset class allocations
Think Function, Not Form
Correlation between asset class allocations and future five-year returns have been negative
Defining policy by function of allocation may help investors to avoid ill-timed policy changes
Think Function, Not Form
Relative Performance by Economic Environment
Ri iGlobal equities
Corporate spreadsPrivate equity
EMD
Global bonds
Canadian equitiesInflation-sensitive
equitiesCommodities
Inflation-linked
Rising
Growth Absolute Return/Active Risk
Real estate
Global bondsCanadian bonds
bondsGold/precious metals
Falling
RisingFalling Inflation
5309813_3
Think Function, Not FormAsset Class Performance by Global Market Environment
Average Monthly Real Returns in CAD, 1973 – February 2012
Non Precious PreciousNon-Precious PreciousMSCI World Metals Metals Canadian MSCI
Environments1 World Bonds2 Commodities3 Commodities Bonds4 Canada
Growth 4.0% 1.6% 1.6% 0.1% 2.2% 3.1%
Weak Growth -2.5 1.1 -3.8 -2.2 1.1 -4.8
Inflation 1.0 0.6 1.8 1.9 1.3 3.4
1See Economic Environments Over Time slide for details2Citigroup World Govt Bond Hedged CAD 1985 – 2012, Barclays Capital US Intm Government Hedged CAD 1973 – 19843Equal-weighted average of GSCI Agriculture, Industrial Metals, and Energy Total Return 1983 – 2012; GSCI Total Return 1973 – 1982450% DEX Universe Bond /50% DEX Long Bond 1980 – 2012; DEX Long Bond 1973 – 1979Sources: MSCI, Citigroup, Barclays Capital, Goldman Sachs, DEX, Datastream, Wellington Management
Stagflation -1.4 0.4 4.3 4.9 -0.2 0.4
Where Are We Now?
Economic Environment of Various Markets
Ri iRising
Growth
US
AustraliaIndia
Falling
Falling RisingInflation
CanadaChina
IndiaEurope
6309813_3
The Challenge
Agenda
Balancing Risk Exposures – Helpful Tools
Case Study
“Think Function, Not Form” framework
Balancing Risk ExposuresHelpful Tools
Risk parity
Opportunistic niche betas
Active risk and absolute return
7309813_3
Risk ParityPursuit of Balance
GSCINon- GSCI Barclays
Citigroup Precious Precious CapitalCitigroup Precious Precious CapitalMSCI MSCI Canadian WGBI Metal Metal GILBWorld Canada Bonds* Hedged Commodities Commodities Hedged
Volatility 13.2% 17.1% 5.0% 2.9% 15.4% 16.4% 4.8%
Balanced FundWeights 40.0% 20.0% 40.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%Contribution to Risk 58.3 35.3 6.4% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Risk Parity FundyWeights 35.0% 0.0% 0.0% 149.0% 24.0% 16.0% 34.0%Contribution to Risk 25.3 0.0 0.0 24.5 24.9 13.0 12.4
*50% DEX Universe Bond /50% DEX Long BondData: 1998 – February 2012
Risk ParityPursuit of Balance
Annualized Standard Deviation, 1998 – February 2012 (%)
See previous slide for underlying asset mixes
8309813_3
Risk ParityPursuit of Balance
12-Month Return Difference, December 1998 – February 2012 (%)Risk Parity Outperforms
Balanced Fund Outperforms
Risk Parity Balanced Difference
Return 5.6% 5.5% 0.1%Risk* 3.3 8.4 -5.1Sharpe Ratio 0.6 0.2 0.4Correlation 0.6
*Standard deviationSee previous slide for underlying asset mixes
The Challenge
Agenda
Balancing Risk Exposures – Helpful Tools
Case Study
9309813_3
Using the Full Tool KitMore Balanced Risk Exposures
Rising
Traditional 60/40 MixFull Tool Kit
70%
13%
14%
3%
Rising
Falling
Growth
Rising
Falling
Growth
49%
16%
15%
7%13%
See Using the Full Tool Kit – Better Risk-Adjusted Returns slide for details
RisingFalling InflationRisingFalling Inflation
Impact of Adding 25% Risk Parity
% Allocation Contribution to Risk
60%
16%
14%
4%6%
Rising
Falling
Growth
*15% Canadian equity, 30% global equityTotals may not add up due to rounding
RisingFalling Inflation
10309813_3
Second Step…Add Niche Opportunistic Investments
Examples: Opportunistic Equity and Opportunistic Fixed Income
Example of Themes Emphasized
Selected European exposureFinancialsEnduring assets
Opportunistic Equity Opportunistic Fixed Income
Selected European exposureFinancialsEnduring assets
EMD (nominals, ILBs, and corporates)High yield/bank loansSelected European exposureg
Shale gasGlobal agriculture
Tactical market exposures Tactical market exposures
Enduring assetsShale gasGlobal agriculture
p p
Second Step…Add 12.5% Niche Opportunistic Investments
% Allocation Contribution to Risk
Rising
Falling
Growth
RisingFalling Inflation
59%
16%
14%
4%7%
Niche Investments: 60% equity/40% fixed income*14.0% Canadian, 22.5% global equityTotals may not add up due to rounding
RisingFalling Inflation
11309813_3
Third Step…Add Explicit Global Inflation Hedges
Allocation
25% I fl ti iti itiRi i
Growth
Falling
RisingFalling Inflation
25% Inflation-sensitive equities25 Diversified commodities25 Precious metals commodities20 Global inflation-linked bonds
5 EM inflation-linked bonds
100%
Rising
RisingFalling Inflation 100%
Impact of Adding 10% Explicit Global Inflation Hedges
12 5
% Allocation Contribution to Risk
55%
16%
15%
6%8%
12.5Rising
Falling
Growth
RisingFalling Inflation
Niche Investments: 60% equity/40% fixed income*6.5% Canadian equity, 22.5% global equityTotals may not add up due to rounding
RisingFalling Inflation
12309813_3
Final Step…Add 10% Absolute Return
% Allocation Contribution to Risk
49%
16%
15%
7%13%
12.5 Rising
Falling
Growth
Niche Investments: 60% equity/40% fixed income*5.0% Canadian equity, 17.5% global equity Totals may not add up due to rounding
RisingFalling Inflation
Active RiskMarket Environments Provide Different Opportunities
High
HighLow Pairwise Stock Correlations
High
StockReturn
Dispersion
Theoretical best forpure stock picking
Calm - usually good
Crises
Best for macro;
Low
for stock picking worst for stock picking
13309813_3
Active Risk – Where Are We Now?Stock Correlations Down From Recent Highs
Average Pairwise Correlation, MSCI World, Trailing 13 WeeksWith Mean and ±1 Standard Deviation Bands, 1988 – March 2012
+1 St Dev
MeanMean
-1 St Dev
Data through 10 March 2012Sources: MSCI, Wellington Management
Using the Full Tool KitMore Balanced Risk Exposures
Traditional 60/40 MixFull Tool Kit
Rising
70%
13%
14%
3%
Rising
Falling
Growth
Rising
Falling
Growth
49%
16%
15%
7%13%
See Using the Full Tool Kit – Better Risk-Adjusted Returns slide for details
RisingFalling InflationRisingFalling Inflation
14309813_3
Traditional 60/40 Full Tool Kit
Absolute return – 10.0%
Using the Full Tool KitBetter Risk-Adjusted Returns
Niche investments – 12.5Inflation hedges – 10.0Risk parity – 25.0Traditional bonds1 40% 20.0Traditional equity 602 22.53
100% 100.0%
Projected net return 6.3% 7.4%Projected net return 6.3% 7.4%Projected risk 10.0% 8.9%Return/risk 0.63 0.84% return from beta 92% 73%% return from alpha 8 27150% Canadian long bonds/50% Canadian core bonds2 20% Canadian equity, 40% global equity317.5% global equity, 5.0% Canadian equityBased on Wellington Management 5-year capital market expectations. Actual results may differ significantly from projections.
Think Function, Not FormMore Balanced Risk Exposures
Rising
Contribution to Risk
Rising
Growth
49%
15%
13%
Inflation RisingFalling
Falling
16%7%
13%