Thesis Svendsen 2006
-
Upload
juan-manuel-mauro -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
2
Transcript of Thesis Svendsen 2006
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
1/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
2/88
HIN - HovedoppgaveMaster i teknologiPostboks 385, Postboks 3858505 NARVIK
Telefon: 76 96 60 00Telefax: 76 96 68 10
Tittel
Coordinated control of spacecraft in formation
Koordinert styring av romfarty i formasjon
Dato
12. juni 2006
Gradering
pen Ja
ForfattereLisa Maria Svendsen
Antall sider80
Vedlegg
1
Institutt for
Data-, elektro- og romteknologiStudieretning
Romteknologi
Veileder
Frsteamanuensis Dr. Ing. Per NicklassonOppdragsgiver
HiNOppdragsgivers kontaktperson
Frsteamanuensis Dr. Ing.Per Nicklasson
Sammendrag
Oppgaven omhandler modellering og styring av relative translasjon og rotasjon av toromfarty i formasjon i jordbane. En matematisk modell er utledet, en refert tilledersystemet og en refert til ECI systemet. En regulator for relative translasjon ogrelative rotasjon er utledet, en basert p ledersystemet og en basert p ECI systemet.Regulatordesignet er basert p en velocity error sliding surface regulator. Simulering avden utledede regulatoren for ledersystemet er utfrt.
Abstract
The project deals with modelling and control of relative translation and rotation of twoformation flying spacecraft in Earth orbit. A mathematical model of relative translationand rotation is derived. The model is referenced both in the leader-fixed system and in theEarth-fixed inertial coordinate system. Furthermore, a state feedback controller forregulation of relative translation and rotation based on the leader-fixed model, and one
based on the Earth-fixed model is derived. The tracking controllers are based on velocityerror sliding surface. Simulation of the propsed controller for the leader-fixed system is
performed.Norske stikkord
formasjonsflyvende romfartymatematisk modelleringrelative translasjon og rotasjonregulatordesign
Keywords
formation flying spacecraftmathematical modellingrelative translation and rotationcontrol design
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
3/88
Master thesis project 2006for
Stud. Techn. Lisa Maria Svendsen
Coordinated control of spacecraft in formation
Spacecraft flying in formation are revolutionizing our way of performing space-basedoperations, and this new paradigm brings on several advantages in space missionaccomplishment, and new opportunities and applications for such missions. Spacecraftformation flying is a technology that includes two or more spacecraft in a tightly controlledspatial configuration, whose operations are closely synchronized. The distributed spacecraftstructure appears as a single sensing system for the user, whose physical size largely exceeds
the barriers imposed by a single body. The concept makes the way for new and betterapplications in space industry such as monitoring of the earth and its surrounding atmosphere,geodesy, deep space imaging and exploration, and in-orbit servicing and maintenance ofspacecraft. The replacement of traditional large and complex spacecraft with an array ofsimpler micro-satellites, introduces a multitude of advantages regarding mission cost and
performance. The major advantage of formation flying of spacecraft lies in flexibility andmodularity. The development of formation flying technologies for spacecraft applications willenable the use of a modular spacecraft structure where multiple distributed spacecraft could
be coordinated to act as one. The life span of the mission can be prolonged with thepossibility of adding new units to replenish or augment the formation. The initial instrumentbaseline can evolve by implementing new measurement concepts at a later time, withoutrequiring a complete replacement of all the spacecraft in the formation. This also entailssystem redundancy at a large scale, and not only in subsystems.
The advantages of using spacecraft formations come at a cost of increased complexity andtechnological challenges. Formation flying introduces a control problem with strict and time-varying boundaries on spacecraft reference trajectories, and collisions between spacecraftshould of course be avoided at all costs. The rise of spacecraft formation flying as a newtechnology has resulted in new areas of research, and the concept requires detailed knowledgeand tight control of relative distances, velocities and orientations for participating spacecraft.A challenge for tight spacecraft formation flying lies in the coordination of the spacecraft
motions relative to each other, to avoid inter-satellite interference and collisions and achievemission goals, while minimizing the required control efforts. In addition, tight spacecraftformations will be sensitive to perturbations due to external disturbances caused byatmospheric and solar drag, and variations in the gravity field of the Earth, and a solution tothe control problem must be able to suppress such perturbations.
This project assignment deals with modelling and control of relative translation and rotationof two formation flying spacecraft in Earth orbit. The work shall be substantiated withtheoretical analysis and system simulations in MATLAB.
Technical specifications for the system are chosen by the student in cooperation with the
supervisor.
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
4/88
Problems:
1. Perform a study on previous work within modelling and control of relative translationaland rotational motion in leader-follower spacecraft formations. The papers (Kristiansen etal, 2005) and (Kristiansen & Nicklasson, 2005) are a recommended starting point
(preprint available from advisor).
2. Derive the mathematical model of relative translation and rotation in a leader-followerformation with two spacecraft. The model should be referenced in both the leader orbitcoordinate system (leader-fixed) and an Earth-fixed inertial coordinate system.
3. Suggest one state feedback controller for regulation of relative translation and rotationbased on the leader-fixed model, and one based on the Earth-fixed model. Assume that theleader spacecraft is perfectly controlled in a chosen orbit, and that the follower spacecrafthas continuous thrust about all axes and in all directions available at all times.
4. Perform a theoretical analysis of the stability in the closed loop system, and investigateadvantages and disadvantages using a leader-fixed vs. Earth-fixed model.
5. Perform simulations of the spacecraft formation in MATLAB, and present simulationresults to visualize the performance of the proposed controller for the leader-fixed model.
References:
R. Kristiansen, E. I. Grtli, P. J. Nicklasson and J. T. Gravdahl (2005).A model of relativeposition and attitude in a leader-follower spacecraft formation. Submitted to Mathematicaland Computer Modelling of Dynamical Systems.
Kristiansen, R. and P. J. Nicklasson (2005). Spacecraft formation flying: A review and newresults on state feedback control. Submitted to Acta Astronautica.
Extradition date: 16.01.2006
Submission date: 18.07.2006
Supervisor: Ass. Professor Dr. Ing. Per J. Nicklasson
Advisor: PhD student Raymond Kristiansen, M.Sc
Hgskolen i NarvikInstitutt for data, elektro og romteknologi
Veileder
(sign)
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
5/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
6/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
7/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
8/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
9/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
10/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
11/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
12/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
13/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
14/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
15/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
16/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
17/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
18/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
19/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
20/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
21/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
22/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
23/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
24/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
25/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
26/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
27/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
28/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
29/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
30/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
31/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
32/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
33/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
34/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
35/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
36/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
37/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
38/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
39/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
40/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
41/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
42/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
43/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
44/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
45/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
46/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
47/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
48/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
49/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
50/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
51/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
52/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
53/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
54/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
55/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
56/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
57/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
58/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
59/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
60/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
61/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
62/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
63/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
64/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
65/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
66/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
67/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
68/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
69/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
70/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
71/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
72/88
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350-50
0
50
100
150
Position[m]
Relative position and velocity
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350-2
0
2
4
6
8
Time [s]
Velocity
[m/s] v
x
vy
vz
xyz
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
73/88
0 500 1000 1500 20000
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.81
Attitudequater
nio Relativeattitudeandangular velocity
1
2
3
0 500 1000 1500 20000
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
Time[s]
Angular
velocity[rad/s]
x
y
z
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
74/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
75/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
76/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
77/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
78/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
79/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
80/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
81/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
82/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
83/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
84/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
85/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
86/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
87/88
-
8/13/2019 Thesis Svendsen 2006
88/88