Thermodynamics of pyrope - majorite, Mg3Al2Si3O12 ...
Transcript of Thermodynamics of pyrope - majorite, Mg3Al2Si3O12 ...
HAL Id: hal-00514976https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00514976
Submitted on 4 Sep 2010
HAL is a multi-disciplinary open accessarchive for the deposit and dissemination of sci-entific research documents, whether they are pub-lished or not. The documents may come fromteaching and research institutions in France orabroad, or from public or private research centers.
L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, estdestinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documentsscientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,émanant des établissements d’enseignement et derecherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoirespublics ou privés.
Thermodynamics of pyrope - majorite, Mg3Al2Si3O12 -Mg4Si4O12, solid solution from atomistic model
calculationsVictor Vinograd, Bjoern Winkler, Andrew Putnis, Herbert Kroll, Victor
Milman, Julian Gale, Olga Fabrichnaya
To cite this version:Victor Vinograd, Bjoern Winkler, Andrew Putnis, Herbert Kroll, Victor Milman, et al.. Thermody-namics of pyrope - majorite, Mg3Al2Si3O12 - Mg4Si4O12, solid solution from atomistic model calcula-tions. Molecular Simulation, Taylor & Francis, 2006, 32 (02), pp.85-99. �10.1080/08927020500501599�.�hal-00514976�
For Peer Review O
nly
Thermodynamics of pyrope - majorite, Mg3Al2Si3O12 - Mg4Si4O12, solid solution from atomistic model calculations
Journal: Molecular Simulation/Journal of Experimental Nanoscience
Manuscript ID: GMOS-2005-0059.R1
Journal: Molecular Simulation
Date Submitted by the Author:
25-Nov-2005
Complete List of Authors: Vinograd, Victor; University of Frankfurt, Institute of Mineralogy Winkler, Bjoern; University of Frankfurt, Institute of Mineralogy Putnis, Andrew; University of Muenster, Institute of Mineralogy Kroll, Herbert; University of Muenster, Institute of Mineralogy Milman, Victor; Accelrys
Gale, Julian; Curtin University of Technology, Nanochemistry Research Institute Fabrichnaya, Olga; Max-Planck-Institute for Metal Research
Keywords: Monte Carlo simulations, pyrope-majorite s.s., activity-composition relations, cubic/tetragonal transition
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
For Peer Review O
nly
Table 1. The empirical interatomic potentials used in the present study. The notation [4]
and [6] refers to the coordination number of the associated species.
Buckingham
Interaction A (eV) ρ (Å) C (eV* Å6)
Al(core)-O(shell) 1262.2081 0.286370 0.0
Mg(core)-O(shell)
1432.8544 0.277265 0.0
Si(core)-O(shell) 1073.4668 0.298398 0.0
O(shell)-O(shell) 598.8996 0.314947 26.89746
Spring
Interaction K (eV* Å-2 ) O(core)-O(shell) 56.5598
Three-body
Interaction kθ (eV*rad-2 ) θ ( degree)
O(shell)-Si[4]- O(shell) 0.77664 109.47
O(shell)-Si[6]- O(shell) 2.2955 90.0
O(shell)-Al[4]- O(shell) 1.2883 109.47
O(shell)-Al[6]- O(shell) 1.8807 90.0
Note: The charges on the oxygen core and shell are 0.746527 and -2.446527, respectively. Cutoff distance for the Buckingham potentials is 12 Å.
Page 1 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Table 2. Structural data and elastic stiffness coefficients for majorite as calculated with
the SLEC and DFT GGA in comparison with available experimental data. Cell parameters
XRD SLEC DFT-GGA
a (Å) 11.501a; 11.481b; 11.519c
11.494 11.670
c (Å) 11.48a; 11.406b; 11.420c
11.392 11.561
a/c 1.0018 1.0089 1.0094 Volume (Å3) 1518.494 a 1505.040 1574.474
Atomic coordinates
XRDa SLEC
(Core)
DFT-GGA
x 0.1253 0.1256 0.1287 y 0.0112 0.0120 0.0135
Mg1 16f
z 0.2587 0.2623 0.2665 x 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 y 0.2500 0.2500 0.2500
Mg2 8e
z 0.6258 0.6227 0.6235 x 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 y 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mg3 8c
z 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000 x 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 y 0.2500 0.2500 0.2500
Si1 4a
z 0.3750 0.3750 0.3750 x 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 y 0.2500 0.2500 0.2500
Si2 4b
z 0.8750 0.8750 0.8750 x 0.1249 0.1261 0.1254 y 0.0065 0.0116 0.0116
Si3 16f
z 0.7544 0.7560 0.7568 x 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 y 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Si4 8d
z 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 x 0.0282 0.0257 0.0268 y 0.0550 0.0603 0.0588
O1 16f
z 0.6633 0.6685 0.6691 x 0.0380 0.0429 0.0447 y 0.9529 0.9540 0.9565
O2 16f
z 0.8562 0.8610 0.8611 x 0.2195 0.2248 0.2234 y 0.1023 0.1079 0.1069
O3 16f
z 0.8021 0.8070 0.8053 x 0.2150 0.2145 0.2117 y 0.9106 0.9161 0.9165
O4 16f
z 0.7000 0.7013 0.7028 x 0.9412 0.9353 0.9372 y 0.1617 0.1629 0.1638
O5 16f
z 0.4680 0.4690 0.4678 x 0.8960 0.8980 0.8977 y 0.2080 0.2102 0.2153
O6 16f
z 0.7851 0.7821 0.7833
Elastic constants Observed (GPa) SLEC (GPa)
Page 2 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
C11 286.4d 295.10
C44 85.0d 85.23
C66 93.2d 93.66
C12 83.0d 112.7
C16 1.4d 14.72
Bulk modulus 159.8d; 166.0e 170.14
References: aAngel et al. [9]; bKato & Kumazawa [8]; cHeinemann et al. [11]; dPacalo & Weidner [33]; eSinogeikin & Bass [34];.
Page 3 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Table 3. The comparison between empirically and ab initio calculated differences in the
lattice energies of selected configurations.
Energy difference
Empirical
potentials
Ab initio
D-(A+B)/2 0.0508 0.0744
C-B 0.1054 0.1556
Notations: A – pyrope, d3Ia ; B – majorite, I41/a; C - Majorite, P4132; D - Majorite50, 3Ia . Values are in eV
per octahedral atom.
Page 4 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Table 4. The final parameters of the fitted cluster expansion.
Pairwise energies
Mg-Al Al-Si Mg-Si Mg-Al Al-Si Mg-Si Distance (Å)
0 GPa 20 GPa 4.9511 -13.849 -12.332 -32.350 -21.125 -21.611 -54.338 5.7178 -17.769 -16.637 -46.718 -20.852 -18.233 -51.553 8.0883 -9.239 -8.113 -16.804 -11.700 -9.697 -24.627 9.4852 -6.203 -4.772 -8.486 -7.239 -4.259 -13.335 9.9072 -4.526 -3.923 -5.208 -7.152 -3.093 -8.592
11.4400 -2.321 -3.344 -5.148 -5.540 -6.009 -7.435 12.4676 -2.948 -0.165 0.664 -7.252 -3.375 -1.886 12.7916 -2.093 -1.855 -1.742 -4.913 -1.385 -2.286
The elastic term
Parameter 0 GPa 20 GPa A12 610.85 906.51 A21 640.00 899.48
Quaternary energies
Cluster type 0 GPa 20 GPa MgMgMgSi -3.8054 -4.0740 MgSiMgSi -12.7228 -14.4620 MgSiSiSi -3.3496 -4.3289 AlAlAlSi 2.7180 1.0271 AlAlSiSi 5.0292 3.2307 AlSiAlSi -2.0462 -3.1154 AlSiSiSi 1.6866 2.3576
AlAlAlMg -0.8564 -0.0710 AlAlMgMg 0.0363 2.2000 AlMgAlMg -6.4528 -6.8823 AlMgMgMg -1.7643 -2.1405
MgAlSiSi 2.1632 1.0320 MgSiAlSi -7.2655 -4.7004
AlSiMgMg -0.4698 0.0186 AlMgSiMg -5.8033 -7.8190 MgSiAlAl 0.0 0.0 MgAlSiAl 0.0 0.0 MgMgSiSi 0.0 0.0
MgMgMgMg 0.0 0.0 SiSiSiSi 0.0 0.0
AlAlAlAl 0.0 0.0 Note: the values are in kJ per mole of octahedral cations, or per 1.5 moles of Si[4] atoms.
Page 5 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Table 5. Coefficients of the Redlich-Kister polynomial for the excess free energy in
the pyrope – majorite solid solution.
N A1n A2n*10-3
A3n*10-6
[kJ/mol] [kJ/mol/K] [kJ/mol/K2]
1 20.7761 2.91736 -2.3053
2 -11.1357 19.77231 -5.979
3 -17.4504 22.02424 -4.9062
4 14.7575 -24.45104 8.7821
5 40.7301 -36.20679 8.1251
6 -13.7634 19.75529 -6.5512
7 -17.2006 10.69285 -1.4385
N B1n B2n*10-3
B3n*10-6
[kJ/mol] [kJ/mol/K] [kJ/mol/K2]
1 -0.6976 2.1641 -0.3205
2 3.1557 -0.0637 0.1517
3 -0.2216 9.8304 -3.9812
4 -16.0881 20.3068 -5.5879
5 -24.0941 1.1400 4.6094
6 23.0833 -26.5699 7.2069
7 37.4186 -16.7439 0.0
Page 6 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review Only1.6 1.8 2 2.2 2.4 2.6
Interatomic distance (experiment)
1.6
1.8
2
2.2
2.4
2.6
Inte
rato
mic
dis
tan
ce (
calc
ula
ted
) Mg-O (DFT GGA)
Si-O (DFT GGA)
Si-O (SLEC)
Mg-O (SLEC)
Page 7 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
254x190mm (72 x 72 DPI)
Page 8 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review Only0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32
Static lattice energy (GULP) [kJ/mol]
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32F
itte
d e
ner
gy
[k
J/m
ol]
a
Majorite, C2/c
Majorite, I 41/a
Page 9 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review Only0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Excess enthalpy (GULP) [kJ/mol]
0
4
8
12
16
20
24
28
32F
itte
d e
nth
alp
y [
kJ/
mo
l]b
Majorite, C 2/c
Majorite, I 41/a
Page 10 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
254x190mm (72 x 72 DPI)
Page 11 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review Only0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Excess enthalpy (GULP) [kJ/mol]
0
5
10
15
20
25
30F
itte
d e
nth
alp
y [
kJ/
mo
l]
20 GPa
Majorite I 41/a
Majorite C 2/c
Page 12 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review Only0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Mole fraction of majorite
0
5
10
15
20
25
30E
nth
alp
y o
f d
iso
rder
[k
J/m
ol]
Pyr Maj
20 GPa
3673 K
1073 K
Page 13 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review Only0 1000 2000 3000 4000
Temperature, K
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1L
RO
par
amet
er
Phillips et al., 1992
(NMR)
Angel et al., 1989
(XRD)
Majorite
20 GPa
0 GPa
Page 14 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review Only1000 2000 3000 4000
Temperature, K
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8P
rob
abil
ity
dif
fere
nce
, 3
Pij
kl(S
i) -
Pij
kl(V
a)MgMgSiSi
MgMgMgMg+SiSiSiSi
MgSiMgSi
MgMgMgSi+MgSiSiSi
0 GPa
MajoritePage 15 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review Only0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Mole fraction of majorite
0
2
4
6
8
10
Co
nfi
gu
rati
on
al e
ntr
op
y [
J/m
ol/
K]
20 GPaIdeal entropy
3673 K
1073 K
Pyr Maj
Page 16 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review Only0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Mole fraction of majorite
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Fre
e en
erg
y o
f m
ixin
g [
kJ/
mo
l]1073 K
3673 K
MajPyr
20 GPa
Page 17 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
254x190mm (72 x 72 DPI)
Page 18 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review Only0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Mole fraction of majorite
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Act
ivit
y
2673 K
1073 K
20 GPa
Pyr Maj
Page 19 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review Only0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Mole fraction of majorite
1366.4
1366.6
1366.8
1367
1367.2U
nit
cel
l v
olu
me
[A
]3
o
2273 K, 20 GPa
Pyr Maj
Page 20 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
254x190mm (72 x 72 DPI)
Page 21 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 22 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 23 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
1
Thermodynamics of pyrope - majorite, Mg3Al2Si3O12 -
Mg4Si4O12, solid solution from atomistic model calculations
V. L. VINOGRADa,*
, B. WINKLERa, A. PUTNIS
b, H. KROLL
b, V. MILMAN
c,
J. D. GALEd and O. B. FABRICHNAYA
e
a University of Frankfurt, Institute of Mineralogy,
Senckenberanlage 30, 60054 Frankfurt a.M., Germany
b University of Münster, Institute of Mineralogy,
Correnssrasse 24, 48149, Münster, Germany
c Accelrys, 334 Cambridge Science Park,
Cambridge CB4 0WN, United Kingdom
d Nanochemistry Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology,
PO Box U1987, Perth 6845, Western Australia.
e Max-Planck-Institute for Metal Research,
Heisenbergstr 3, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: English U.S.
Formatted: English U.S.
Deleted: ictor
Deleted: inograd
Deleted: joern
Deleted: inkler
Deleted: ndrew
Deleted: utnis
Deleted: erbert
Deleted: roll
Deleted: ictor
Deleted: ilman
Deleted: ulian
Deleted: ale
Deleted: lga
Deleted: abrichnaya
Page 24 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
2
Abstract
Static lattice energy calculations, based on empirical pair potentials have been performed
for a large set of different structures with compositions between pyrope and majorite, and
with different states of order of octahedral cations. The energies have been cluster
expanded using pair and quaternary terms. The derived ordering constants have been
used to constrain Monte Carlo simulations of temperature-dependent properties in the
ranges of 1073 – 3673 K and 0 – 20 GPa. The free energies of mixing have been
calculated using the method of thermodynamic integration. At zero pressure the
cubic/tetragonal transition is predicted for pure majorite at 3300 K. The transition
temperature decreases with the increase of the pyrope mole fraction. A miscibility gap
associated with the transition starts to develop at about 2000 K and xmaj=0.8, and widens
with the decrease in temperature and the increase in pressure. Activity-composition
relations in the range of 0-20 GPa and 1073- 2673 K are described with the help of a
high-order Redlich-Kister polynomial.
Keywords: Pyrope-majorite s.s., Monte Carlo simulations, cubic/tetragonal transition,
activity-composition relations.
* Corresponding author. Tel. +49 69 798 22764
E-mail address: [email protected]
Formatted: Indent: First
line: 0 pt, Line
spacing: Double
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Deleted: the
Deleted: Xmaj
Page 25 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
3
1. Introduction
Recent progress in the understanding of the chemical composition and thermo-physical
properties of the Earth’s mantle has been achieved by comparing geophysical data on
seismic velocities with the corresponding properties of theoretically calculated
equilibrium mineral assemblages subjected to high pressures and temperatures, e.g. [1].
Pyrope- and majorite-rich garnet is thought to be an important phase of variable
composition in the transition zone of the Earth’s mantle (410-650 km). Theoretical
calculations show [2, 3] that the mole fraction of majorite, Mg4Si4O12, component in the
aluminosilicate garnet increases gradually with depth. This corresponds to an increase of
the site fractions of Mg and Si in the octahedral position of the garnet structure, which
occurs via the coupled substitution 2Al3+ = Mg2+ + Si4+. Any realistic model of mineral
transformations in the transition zone requires knowledge of the thermodynamic activities
of pyrope and majorite in the garnet solid solution. This study is concerned with atomistic
modelling of thermodynamic mixing effects associated with this substitution.
Due to practical challenges, few experimental data is available to constrain the
thermodynamics of mixing in the pyrope-majorite binary system. Akaogi et al. [4] have
determined heats of dissolution in molten 2PbO*B2O3 of several cubic garnets with
compositions in the range of 0 < xmaj <0.58. They have observed an approximately linear
variation of the heat of dissolution in this compositional range. The dissolution enthalpy
of the majorite end-member with the tetragonal structure has been measured by Yusa et
al. [5]. Using a linear extrapolation of the data of Akaogi et al. [4], Yusa et al. [5] have
estimated the enthalpy of the cubic/tetragonal transition in majorite to be 20.4 ± 5.0
kJ/mol per 12 oxygen atoms. The combination of the data of Akaogi et al. [4] and Yusa et
Formatted: Indent: First
line: 0 pt, Line
spacing: Double
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Deleted: (e.g. Fiquet, 2001; Gasparik, 2003; Fabrichnaya et al., 2004
Deleted: )
Deleted: Any
Deleted: at
Deleted: these pressure/temperature conditions
Deleted: experimental
Deleted: only few
Deleted: are
Deleted: for
Deleted: ing
Deleted: (1987)
Deleted: heats
Deleted: Maj0
Deleted: -Maj
Deleted: heat
Deleted: (1993
Deleted: )
Deleted:
Deleted: (1987)
Deleted: (1993)
Deleted: 2
Deleted: (1987)
... [7]
... [4]
... [5]
... [1]
... [9]
... [11]
... [3]
... [10]
... [12]
... [8]
... [13]
... [2]
... [14]
... [6]
Page 26 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
4
al. [5] suggests a positive enthalpy of mixing at intermediate compositions with a value
of about 12 ± 3.0 kJ/mol at xmaj=0.6. Phase equilibrium studies cannot be used to tightly
constrain mixing properties due to large uncertainties in the pressure calibration and in
the equilibrium composition of the garnet phase. The reported maximal solubility of
majorite in garnet in an assemblage with wadsleyite and stishovite varies between
different studies by up to 20 mole %. [6, 7]. However, the lack of thermodynamic data is
partially compensated by an abundance of structural information. It is known that pure
majorite at low temperatures crystallizes in the tetragonal space group I 41/a [8]. Pyrope-
rich compositions have a cubic structure with space group d3Ia . The cubic/tetragonal
transition is caused by long-range ordering of Mg and Si in the octahedral site. Majorite
samples synthesized at 1800 °C, 17 GPa [9] and at 2000 °C, 17.7 GPa [10] show nearly
complete Mg/Si order. Heinemann et al. [11] have located the cubic/tetragonal transition
at xmaj=0.8 in samples synthesized at 2000 °C and 19 GPa. However, Heinemann et al.
[11] and Hatch and Ghose [12] noted that the true temperature of the order/disorder
transition cannot be judged based on the synthesis temperatures. The tetragonal majorites
are twinned, thereby suggesting that they have a higher symmetry precursor. Heinemann
et al. [11] and Hatch and Ghose [12] argued, therefore, that the cubic/tetragonal transition
occurs during the quench and thus the transition boundary lies somewhere below 1800
°C. This assumption has been questioned by Wang et al. [13] who have observed tweed
microstructure in majorite-rich samples synthesized at 2300 °C, just below the melting
temperature, which is about 2600 °C for pure majorite [14]. Wang et al. [13] concluded
that the transition occurs at about 2300 °C. The location of the transition boundary is a
matter of an ongoing debate, e.g. [15], which has important implications for models of
the rheological properties of the transition zone. If the stability field of tetragonal
Formatted: Font:
(Default) Times New
Roman, Complex Script
Font: Times New RomanFormatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Deleted: (1993)
Deleted:
Deleted: Maj60
Deleted: .
Deleted: t
Deleted: (e.g. Akaogi and Akimoto (1977) and Kanzaki (1987))
Deleted: T
Deleted: , however,
Deleted: (Kato and Kumazawa, 1985)
Deleted: group
Deleted: (Angel et al., 1989)
Deleted: (Phillips et al., 1992)
Deleted: (1997)
Deleted: (1997)
Deleted: (1990)
Deleted: , however,
Deleted: of the synthesis
Deleted: had
Deleted: (1997)
Deleted: (1990)
Deleted: (1993)
Deleted: , according to Gasparik (1990),
Deleted: (1993)
Deleted: (
Deleted: Tomioka et al., 2002)
Deleted: to
Deleted: for
Deleted: :
Page 27 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
5
majorite-rich garnets is intersected by the mantle geotherm, it is most likely that the
elastic properties of majorite are altered due to the presence of mobile domain walls. For
example, a drastic change in the viscoelasticity due to the cubic/tetragonal transition has
recently been observed experimentally in Ca1-xSrxTiO3 perovskite [16]. Heinemann et al.
[11] have noted that the increase of the pyrope mole fraction should enhance disorder on
octahedral sites and move the transition to even lower temperatures, thus decreasing the
likelihood for an intersection of the I 41/a stability field by the geotherm. In this sense, the
pyrope-majorite system behaves then analogously to the plagioclase solid solution where
an increase in the albite mole fraction leads to a rapid decrease of the 1/1 IC transition
temperature [17]. Referring to the same analogy, one can expect that the mixing enthalpy
has a kink at the transition line and that a miscibility gap, associated with the boundary,
develops at some low temperature. Such a gap should be reflected in the thermodynamic
activities of pyrope and majorite. The commonly used ‘two sublattice’ model [4, 5, and
14] ignores this complication. In this model, the configurational entropy related to the
octahedral atoms is assumed to be ideal for the Mg-rich and Si-rich sublattices, i.e. Al is
allowed to mix randomly either with Mg in the Mg-rich sublattice or with Si in the Si-
rich sublattice. Being consistent with the complete long-range order in pure majorite, the
‘two sublattice’ model offers a reasonable approximation for the configurational entropy
of well ordered tetragonal samples. However, the application of this model to pyrope-rich
cubic garnets cannot be easily justified: In the cubic phase Mg, Si and Al should be
allowed to mix within the same sublattice. Since the composition of the majoritic garnet
widely varies in different Mg-Al-Si-O mineral assemblages [3, 4], it is desirable to
develop a model which is applicable to the whole compositional range and to both cubic
and tetragonal garnets. Based on empirical static lattice energy and quantum mechanical
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Deleted: (Harrison, et al., 2003
Deleted: )
Deleted: (1997)
Deleted: (Carpenter & McConnell, 1984
Deleted: )
Deleted: (Akaogi et al., 1987; Gasparik, 1990; Fabrichnaya et al., 2004)
Deleted: (Garparik, 2003; Fabrichnaya et al., 2004
Deleted: )
Page 28 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
6
total energy calculations, as well as Monte Carlo modelling, this study aims to constrain
the cubic/tetragonal transition and mixing properties along the pyrope – majorite binary
in the pressure and temperature range relevant for the transition zone.
Formatted: Font:
(Default) Times New
Roman, Complex Script
Font: Times New RomanFormatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Deleted: and
Page 29 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
7
2. Simulation methodology
The methodology we adopt in this study has been established in a series of recent
simulation studies [18-24]. It consists of the following steps:
– Development and testing of a set of empirical interatomic potentials.
– Static lattice energy calculations (SLEC) on a set of structures with randomly varied
cation configurations.
– Finding a simple equation that describes the energies of the simulated structures. This
procedure is known as the ‘cluster expansion’.
– Using the cluster expansion model to obtain temperature-dependent properties by
Monte Carlo simulation.
– Calculation of the free energies of mixing and ordering by thermodynamic integration
of the Monte Carlo results.
– Refitting the free energies to simple polynomial equations useful for phase equilibrium
calculations.
2.1. The empirical potentials
A set of empirical interatomic potentials has been developed in this study using the relax-
fitting procedure [25] as implemented in the GULP program [26]. The set involves two-
parameter Metal-Oxygen (M-O) Buckingham potentials, three-body O-M-O angle-
bending terms and the shell model for the oxygen polarisability [27-29]. Following
Vinograd et al. [30] we have multiplied formal cation and anion charges by the common
Formatted: Indent: First
line: 0 pt, Line
spacing: Double
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman, Italic
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Indent: First
line: 0 pt, Line
spacing: Double
Deleted:
Deleted: (e.g. Myers et al., 1998; Dove, 2001; Bosenick et al., 2001; Warren et al., 2001; Becker et al., 2000; Becker and Pollock, 2002; Vinograd et al., 2004a).
Deleted: s
Deleted: (Gale, 1996)
Deleted: (Gale, 1997)
Deleted: a
Deleted: bond
Deleted: as described by Winkler et al. (1991)
Deleted: (2004b)
Page 30 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
8
factor 0.85, so that the charges of Mg, Al, Si and O have been reduced to the values of
1.7, 2.55, 3.4 and -1.7, respectively. Such a reduction leads to a much better
transferability of the potentials within mono- and complex oxides. The possible reason
for this improvement is that in dense structures the formal charges on cations cause too
strong a cation-cation repulsion. Vinograd et al. [30] noted that the cation-cation
distances tend to be too long in the formal-charge models. The reduction of the charges
by a small common factor removes this problem, but conveniently preserves the charge
balance. The Buckingham Si(core)-O(shell) and O(core) – O(shell) potentials have been
fitted to structural and elastic constants of stishovite, coesite and α-quartz. The Al – O
potential has been fitted to the data on corundum and the three Al2SiO5 polymorphs. The
Mg – O potential has been fitted to the data on periclase, spinel (MgAl2O4), forsterite,
wadsleyite, ringwoodite, ilmenite, perovskite, pyrope and cordierite. The three-body
terms have then been refitted to relevant subsets of the above-mentioned minerals. The
elastic constants have been adopted from the compilation of Bass [31]. The structural
constants have been taken from the online American Mineralogist Crystal Structures
Database [32]. The potential set is reproduced in Table 1. Table 2 compares the predicted
and observed structural and elastic parameters of majorite. The data for majorite have not
been included in the fit, and therefore can be used as a test of the transferability and
accuracy of the potentials.
‘[Insert table 1 about here]’
‘[Insert table 2 about here]’
‘[Insert fig. 1 about here]’
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Deleted: (2004b)…, α−
Deleted: and moganite
Deleted: then…
Deleted: (1995…),
Deleted: (http://rruff.geo.arizona.edu/AMS/)
Deleted: for
Deleted: Table 1. The empirical interatomic potentials used in the present study. The notation [4] and [6] refers to the coordination number of the
Deleted: predicted
Deleted: as calculated with the SLEC and DFT GGA in Deleted: the
Deleted: comparison with available experimental data.¶
... [17]
... [31]
... [16]
... [32]
... [19]
... [33]
... [15]
... [34]
... [20]
... [35]
... [18]
... [36]
... [24]
... [37]
... [23]
... [38]
... [21]
... [39]
... [22]
... [40]
... [25]
... [41]
... [26]
... [42]
... [27]
... [43]
... [28]
... [44]
... [29]
... [45]
... [30]
... [46]
Page 31 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
9
2.2. Quantum mechanical calculations as a test for the accuracy of the potentials
While calculations based on empirical potentials are computationally very efficient, the
predictive power of this approach requires an independent test. Here we compare selected
SLEC results with parameter-free quantum mechanical calculations. For crystals, most
quantum mechanical calculations are currently based on the density functional theory
(DFT) [35-39]. While DFT itself is exact [35], practical calculations require an
approximation for the treatment of the exchange and correlation energies. Here we use
the generalized gradient approximation (GGA), in the form suggested by Perdew, Burke
and Ernzerhof [40]. Results based on GGA calculations are generally in better agreement
with experiment than those obtained with the local density approximation, LDA [41-43].
The study of structures with large unit cells requires a computationally efficient
approach. Here we use the computational scheme in which the charge density and
electronic wavefunctions are expanded in a basis set of plane waves. To avoid explicit
description of tightly bound core electrons, the approach employs ‘ultrasoft’
pseudopotentials [44,45] which mimic the screening of the Coulomb potential of the
nucleus by the core electrons.
Both the academic and commercial versions of CASTEP were used in the present
study for the DFT-GGA calculations. The cut-off energy for the plane wave expansion
was 380 eV. Calculations were performed for ordered tetragonal I 41/a majorite, using
the primitive cell and a k-point sampling of 4x4x4. In all calculations, all symmetry
independent structural parameters were varied simultaneously in the search for the
ground state geometry. The parameters of the ‘relaxed’ (optimized) structure are given in
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman, Not Bold
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman, Italic
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman, Highlight
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Indent: First
line: 18 pt, Line
spacing: Double
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman, Highlight
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: (Hohenberg and Kohn, 1964; Kohn and Sham, 1965; Parr and Yang, 1989; Kryachko and Ludena,1990; Jones and Gunnarsson, 1989}
Deleted: (Hohenberg and Kohn,1964}
Deleted: (1996)
Deleted: (Leung at al., 1991; Goniakowski et al., 1996a; Hamann, 1996)
Deleted: (Vanderbilt, 1990; Kresse and Hafner, 1994)
Deleted: We used
Deleted: performed here
Deleted: We performed
Deleted: c
Deleted: ically
Deleted: shown
Page 32 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
10
Table 2 and in Fig. 1 where they are compared to experimental values and to the results
of the calculations based on empirical potentials. We also computed the ground state
structures of cubic, P 41 32 majorite, d3Ia pyrope and the intermediate, Maj50, structure
with 3Ia symmetry in order to compare the differences of their total energies to those of
the static lattice empirical-potential based calculations. Table 3 shows the differences in
the lattice energy between the configurations of the same composition. The difference in
energies of the cubic P 41 32 and tetragonal I 41/a majorites constitutes 0.105 eV (10.2
kJ/mol) and 0.156 eV (15.0 kJ/mol) for the SLEC and ab initio calculations, respectively.
The energy of the intermediate structure 3Ia is larger than the energy of the equal
mixture of pyrope and tetragonal, I 41/a, majorites by 4.9 kJ/mol (SLEC) and by 7.2
kJ/mol (DFT GGA). These results show that the ab initio and SLEC results are consistent
with each other, but also point to the limitations of these methods. The differences in the
results could be due to limited transferability of the empirical potentials and due to the
“underbonding” usually observed in DFT GGA calculations. DFT GGA calculations
slightly overestimate lattice parameters, which is also seen in the present results for I 41/a
majorite (a = 11.67 Å, c = 11.56 Å). Fig. 1 shows that the distances of short Si-O and Mg-
O bonds, predicted ab initio, are in a very good agreement with the experiment, while the
length of Mg-O bonds with distances larger that 2.3 Å is exaggerated. In view of these
limitations, the 30% difference between the SLEC and DFT GGA could be considered
reasonable. The atomic coordinates and bond distances calculated with the SLEC agree
well with the data of Angel et al. [9]. However, the a/c ratios calculated with the SLEC
and DFT GGA disagree with the very small ratio reported by Angel et al. [9]. On the
contrary, our results compare well with the ratios reported by Kato & Kumazawa [8],
Heinemann et al. [11] and McCommon and Ross [46]. In summary, we conclude that the
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman, Highlight
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman, Italic
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted
Formatted
Deleted: ,
Deleted: …,… …the difference…energies obtained with the
Deleted: These structures are listed in
Deleted: .
Deleted: ¶Although absolute values of
Deleted: ies
Deleted: predicted with ab initio and SLEC calculations are very different, the differences
Deleted: can be
Deleted: well
Deleted: readily compared.
Deleted: 4…16…56
Deleted: t
Deleted: It appears
Deleted: while the SLEC-predicted energy differences are about 30% smaller than the ab initio results.
Deleted: the …inaccuracy of modeling interatomic interactions with…or
Deleted: and
Deleted: approximation…Usually, the…s
Deleted: at
Deleted: It is possible that this overestimation could alter the
Deleted: The a/c ratios and atomic coordinates calculated with Deleted: The atomic coordinates and bond distances predicted both by
... [49]
... [54]
... [48]
... [55]
... [52]
... [56]
... [53]
... [57]
... [51]
... [58]
... [47]
... [59]
... [50]
... [60]
Page 33 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
11
new potentials predict reasonable structural parameters and reasonable energy differences
between the structures selected for the ab initio test. These potentials will be used below
to predict the energies of a larger set of structures different in the composition and the
state of order.
‘[Insert table 3 about here]’
2.3. Supercell calculations
The SLEC calculations have been performed in the athermal limit with GULP in a 2x2x2
supercell (128 octahedral sites) on set of specially constructed structures (configurations)
with different compositions and ordering states. In the first set of calculations, the
pressure was fixed at 0 GPa. We have started with the ordered octahedral arrangement of
Mg and Si consistent with the I 41/a structure determined by Angel et al. [9] and
calculated its relaxed energy. The relaxed coordinates have been used as starting values
for a new structure in which one randomly chosen pair of Mg and Si was swapped. The
swapping has been repeated 60 times. During this exercise, the static energy increased
sharply during the initial steps. Then the rate of increase slowed down indicating the
approach to a set of random distributions. The 60 generated structures with variable
degrees of disorder have been added to the data base. The same procedure has been
repeated for structures with the compositions xmaj=0.75, xmaj=0.50 and xmaj=0.25, which
have been prepared from I 41/a majorite by replacing appropriate numbers of Mg and Si
with Al atoms. The whole set of configurations was used again in a further set of force
field calculations at 20 GPa.
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman, Italic
Formatted: Indent: First
line: 0 pt, Line
spacing: Double
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Deleted: withstan
Deleted: oo
Deleted: d the ab initio test
Deleted: .
Deleted: Table 3. The comparison between empirical and ab
Deleted: -
Deleted: initio calculations of the lattice energies of selected configurations.¶¶Total energies¶Structure
Deleted: zero K …(1989)
Deleted: …In… has…first … has…ing…,…the next set of GULP
... [63]
... [66]
... [64]
... [65]
... [61]
... [69]
... [62]
... [67]
... [70]
... [68]
... [71]
Page 34 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
12
2.4. Cluster expansion
The aim of the cluster expansion is to find a simple equation, which fits the energies (or
enthalpies in the case of a nonzero pressure) of all simulated configurations and,
hopefully, predicts the energy of any other possible configuration. One popular form for
such an expansion is known as the Js formalism, e.g. [19,47],
0AB2/1 E+JPzE
n
n(n)
(n)
i ∑≈ (1)
where n(n)
(n)JP,z and
ABare the coordination numbers, frequencies of AB-type pairs and
ordering constants for pairs of the order n. Jn corresponds to the energy (or enthalpy) of
the exchange reaction
AA+BB=2AB (2)
between atoms A ∈ {Al, Mg, Si} and B ∈ {Al, Mg, Si} located at the n-th distance.
When this equation is applied to the excess energies, E0 is either assumed to be equal to
zero, e.g. [23], or fitted together with the Js, e.g. [24]. In order to determine the set of the
Js for each of the 240 structures prepared in the way described above we have calculated
the frequencies of occurrence of pairs of dissimilar atoms at 8 distances, as specified in
Table 4. Since there are 3 types of dissimilar pairs, Mg-Si, Mg-Al, and Al-Mg, each
configuration i is characterized by 24 frequencies, Pn (the factor 1/2z(n) is included in the
frequency value), and by a value of the relaxed excess energy Ei, where the excess value
is defined relative to the weighted sum of the relaxed energies of pyrope and I 41/a
majorite. The whole set of configurations has been thus characterized by the 240x24
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman, Italic
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Indent: First
line: 0 pt, Line
spacing: Double
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Deleted: o
Deleted: (
Deleted: Dove, 2001; Vinograd, 2001
Deleted: and references therein
Deleted: )
Deleted: (
Deleted: Becker and Pollok, 2002
Deleted: )
Deleted: (
Deleted: Vinograd et al., 2004a
Deleted: )
Deleted: ,
Deleted: way
Deleted: the
Deleted: with
Deleted: with
Deleted:
Deleted: with
Page 35 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
13
frequency matrix P and with the 240-element vector E. With each dissimilar pair we
associate a constant Jn . The vector J is traditionally found by solving the matrix equation
J=P-1
E using a least squares method. We adopt here a slightly different technique.
Vinograd et al. [24] in the study of pyrope-grossular system have observed that when the
fit is applied separately to configurations of the same composition, the E0 value varies
with the composition non-linearly. It was shown that this variation can be well
approximated with a Margules two-parameter equation
)( 21121210 Ax+Axxx=E 2 (3)
where xi are the mole fractions of the end-members. Physically, E0 describes the energy,
which is required to prepare a virtual crystal from the two end-members. In the virtual
crystal the exchangeable atoms, Mg, Al, and Si are “homogenized” forming a virtual
atom with the average size and charge. The state of the virtual crystal is the reference
state of the Js expansion. The Js describe the energetic advantage of separating pairs of
virtual atoms into the pairs of dissimilar atoms and thus include bond relaxation effects
and the Coulomb interaction. In the case of the pyrope-majorite solid solution the mixing
of the cations occurs not only in the solution, but also at the end-member (majorite)
composition. Therefore, E0 does not vanish at x2=1, but includes the energy of
homogenization of Mg2+ and Si4+. To take into account the non-zero value of E0 for
majorite, we modify Equation 3 as follows
)( 21121210 Ay+Ayyy=E 2 (4)
where y2= x2/2=Xmaj/2 and y1=1- y2. Since E0 is a configuration-independent term, its
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman, Spanish
Spain-Modern Sort
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Deleted: 24-element
Deleted: with
Deleted: the
Deleted: (2004a)
Deleted: Eqn.
Page 36 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
14
value must not be mapped onto the Js expansion. Therefore, the J vector is found from
J=P-1
E', where the vector E' is obtained from the vector E by subtracting the value of E0
from each element. Within this procedure we calculate the vector E'', which represents
the approximation to E' predicted with the Js expansion. Finally, we search for the values
of A12 and A21, which result in the best fit. The set of the Jn and Aij parameters is then
used to calculate energies of configurations within a Monte Carlo algorithm. However,
experience shows that the Js calculated in the described way often predict wrong ground
states. In order to avoid this problem we have designed a feedback algorithm (Fig.2) in
which the Js self-educate to predict the correct ground state. The algorithm involves a
Monte Carlo annealing step, which is applied to the small 2x2x2 supercell. The idea of
using the small cell is that the Monte Carlo simulated configuration can be used as an
input for a new SLEC run. We start with a configuration, which is assumed to be a
candidate for the ground state and gradually increase its Monte Carlo temperature up to a
certain value and then gradually decrease it until the configuration freezes in the lowest
energy state. This new configuration is energy-minimized, and its energy and the
frequency numbers are added to the set of previously simulated structures. The new least
squares solution is then obtained and the Monte Carlo annealing is repeated with the new
values of the Js, A12 and A21 parameters. Typically, a few iterations are needed for the Js
to converge to values consistent with the correct ground state. This procedure relies on
the assumption that the empirical model (GULP) predicts the correct ground state.
‘[Insert fig. 2 about here]’
‘[Insert fig. 3,a,b about here]’
‘[Insert fig. 4 about here]’
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted
Deleted: ,…t…its
Deleted: constrain…a
Deleted: Our …, however,
Deleted: 1
Deleted: GULP
Deleted: empirical potential calculation
Deleted: with GULP …d
Deleted: ¶
¶Figure 1. The feed-back algorithm which improves the accuracy of the cluster expansion in predicting ground state configurations.¶¶Table 4. The final parameters of the fitted cluster expansion
Deleted: resulting of the fit
Deleted: . ¶¶Pairwise energies ¶Distance (Å)
... [73]
... [78]
... [72]
... [79]
... [74]
... [76]
... [80]
... [77]
... [81]
... [75]
... [82]
Page 37 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
15
However, this did not happen in the majorite case: the Js converged, but the low-energy
Monte Carlo configuration fluctuated between two structures with identical pair
expansions, but very different GULP energies. One of these configurations corresponded
to the correct I 41/a ground state, while the other one to an unknown triclinic, C 2/c,
structure with a much higher lattice energy. Since these structures had identical pair
expansions, the Js fit was not able to predict the energies of both of them accurately, but
resulted in the same compromise value. The C 2/c configuration was subjected to the
randomization procedure and 60 new randomized configurations were added to the
original set of configurations. Figure 3 shows the Js fit to the whole set of configurations.
The low accuracy of the fit suggests that the pair expansion misses some important
physics. One can easily recognize that I 41/a and C 2/c structures are identical only in
terms of the octahedral distribution. In fact, the C 2/c structure can be obtained from the I
41/a structure with a parallel shift of all octahedral atoms while leaving all other atoms
fixed (Fig. 4). One can also observe that this shift destroys the tetragonal symmetry of the
whole lattice: the four-fold axes in the I 41/a phase pass through the centers of the
tetrahedral clusters of octahedral atoms, where all octahedral atoms are the same, and
through the Si[4] sites, that center these clusters. In C 2/c, the tetragonal symmetry is lost
because the “all-same” tetrahedral clusters are swapped with the clusters that do not
possess four-fold symmetry. Since the C 2/c structure has a higher lattice energy than I
41/a, one can assume that the “all-same” arrangement with the Si[4] in the center has a
lower energy than the all-same arrangement around an empty site. In fact, the octahedral
atoms in garnet form a perfect BCC lattice, which can be built by close packing of
tetrahedral clusters. There are 6 such tetrahedra per one octahedral site. In garnets only ¼
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Deleted: T
Deleted: , however,
Deleted: have been
Deleted: 2
Deleted: 3
Deleted: ,
Deleted: which
Deleted: have
Deleted: the
Page 38 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
16
of these tetrahedra are filled with Si[4] atoms, the other ¾ of the clusters are empty. This
means that the octahedral distribution in garnets is made of two different types of
tetrahedral clusters, filled and empty. This observation immediately suggests a new form
of the cluster expansion, which is able to reflect the energetic difference of these cluster
types:
( )∑∑ +−+≈lk,j,i,
ijklijklijklijkl
n
n(n)
(n)
i EQPPaJPzE 0SiVa
AB32/1 (5)
The first term in this equation describes the interactions within the pairs, while the second
term reflects the tendency of a tetrahedral group to locate itself either around Si[4] or an
empty site. The Pijkl and aijkl denote the probability (frequency) and the multiplicity of the
tetrahedral group ijkl, where i,j,k,l ∈ {Al, Si, Mg}. The factor of 3 is needed to equalize
the numbers of the filled and vacant sites. With each ijkl group we associate an energetic
Qijkl constant. There are 21 symmetrically and chemically distinct groups. However, we
have observed that when all 21 Qijkl constants are allowed to vary in the fit, their
magnitudes become unreasonably large and some values correlate strongly with each
other. We then arbitrarily fixed six of the constants at a value of zero and varied only the
remaining 15 constants. The reduction to the 15-term expansion resulted in reasonable
(small) values of the Q constants (Table 4) and didn't lead to any noticeable decrease in
the fit accuracy compared to the 21-term expansion. Figure 5 illustrates the fit accuracy
of the 15-term expansion. Apparently, the accuracy of J-Q expansion is sufficient for the
energies of I 41/a and C 2/c structures to be correctly distinguished. The J-Q expansion
thus provides the possibility to greatly increase the speed of energy calculation without a
significant loss in the accuracy. This in turn makes it feasible to efficiently simulate a
Boltzmann probability distribution of the octahedral atoms with the Monte Carlo method.
Deleted: W
Deleted: ,
Deleted: however,
Deleted: value
Deleted: st
Deleted: 4
Deleted: were
Deleted: thus
Deleted: a
Deleted: allows
Page 39 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
17
‘[Insert table 4 about here]’
‘[Insert fig. 5 about here]’
‘[Insert fig. 6 about here]’
2.5. Monte Carlo simulations
Monte Carlo simulations have been performed using a 4x4x4 supercell with periodic
boundary conditions (1024 octahedral sites) with our own code. The swapping of sites
has been performed according to the Metropolis algorithm. The energy differences
between the subsequent steps have been calculated using equation (5). The temperature
dependent properties have been calculated on a grid of 32 different compositions across
the pyrope – majorite binary in the interval of 1073 to 3673 K with a step of 200 K. Each
point in the T-X space was annealed for 500,000 Monte Carlo steps and additional
500,000 steps were used for the calculation of the averages. The whole procedure was
repeated twice, with the J-Q sets corresponding to 0 and to 20 GPa. The results of both
calculation runs are qualitatively similar and therefore we plot only the 20-GPa set.
Figure 6 shows the isotherms of the excess configurational enthalpy together with the
original set of energies calculated via the use of explicit interatomic potentials. It is clear
that even at 3673 K the octahedral distribution significantly deviates from a random one.
The breaks in the isotherms reflect the cubic/tetragonal transition. The long-range order
(LRO) parameter variation across the transition was specially investigated at the majorite
composition (Fig. 7). The LRO parameter has been defined as follows
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman, Italic
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Indent: Firstline: 0 pt, Line
spacing: Double
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Deleted:
Deleted: molecule
Deleted: formula unit with one octahedral atom (6 oxygens).¶¶
Deleted: i
Deleted: n
Deleted: h
Deleted: test
Deleted: Eqn
Deleted: .
Deleted: the
Deleted: the
Deleted: p
Deleted: 5
Deleted: with the GULP
Deleted: 6
... [84]
... [83]
Page 40 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
18
AβAα
AβAαod
P+P
PP=Q
−, (6)
where PAα and PAβ are the probabilities of finding A atom (e.g. Mg) in two dissimilar
octahedral sites. These two sites become structurally distinct in the tetragonal majorite
[9]. However, these probabilities (frequencies) cannot be directly determined from the
site occupancies derived from the Monte Carlo simulations because the LRO fluctuates
between the three equally possible orientations. Therefore, we have calculated the LRO
parameter indirectly from the probabilities of AA pairs. The pair probabilities are much
less affected by the spontaneous changes in the LRO orientation. Statistical theories of
LRO suggest, e.g. [49], that at short distances the pair probabilities are functions of both
short-range order (SRO) and LRO parameters. However, the SRO correlations rapidly
vanish with distance and by measuring the AA probability at the maximum separation in
the Monte Carlo supercell one can be fairly sure that the SRO contribution is
insignificant. (This distance was equal to 22.89 Å in our simulations.) Therefore
4/)1()1)(1( 2ododod
2AAβAαAA QQQP=PP=P −=−+ (7)
From Equation 7 one can easily recalculate Qod (Fig. 7). One observes that the predicted
degree of LRO at 2000 °C is in good agreement with the experimental result of Phillips et
al. [10] subject to the assumption that the measured quantity corresponds to the synthesis
temperature. LRO completely disappears at about 3300 K at 0 GPa and at 3450 K at 20
GPa. The transition can be also visualized by monitoring the probabilities of the two
types of tetrahedral clusters of octahedral sites; those with the Si[4] in the middle and the
vacant ones. The difference of these probabilities exhibits a striking change at the
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: English U.S.
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Deleted: (e.g. Angel et al., 1989
Deleted: )
Deleted: T
Deleted: ,
Deleted: however,
Deleted: counted
Deleted: (
Deleted: Vinograd and Putnis, 1999
Deleted: )
Deleted:
Deleted: Eqn.
Deleted: 6
Deleted: (1992)
Deleted: in
Deleted: ,
Deleted: experiences
Page 41 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
19
transition temperature (Fig.8).
‘[Insert fig. 7 about here]’
‘[Insert fig. 8 about here]’
2.6. Thermodynamic integration
It has been shown [18,19,50] that the configurational free energy can be calculated from
Monte Carlo averaged excess energies using the method of λ-integration:
λdEF=F
λ
λ∫+0
0 (8)
In this equation F0 corresponds to the free energy of mixing of the solid solution with
zero ordering energy, which can be calculated theoretically:
)lnlnln( AlAlSiSiMgMg0 xxxxxxTRF ++= (9)
The integral describes the contribution to the free energy from the energy (or the enthalpy
in the case of a nonzero pressure), E , when it changes from the state of complete
disorder to the state of equilibrium order. To calculate λ
E for a state with an
intermediate degree of order defined by certain value of λ, 0< λ <1, one scales the Js and
Qs
Formatted
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Indent: First
line: 0 pt, Line
spacing: Double
Deleted: 7
Deleted:
Deleted: Figure 6. The temperature dependence of the long-range order parameter at 0 pressure and 20 GPa as calculated from Monte Carlo simulations (circles).
Deleted: (Myers, 1999; Dove, 2001)…λ−
Deleted: Note that the E0 term, i.e. the energy of the disordered state, contributes only to the F0 term, but is excluded from the integral. … change…due to the ordering…When
Deleted: at the…of
Deleted:
Deleted: ¶
... [85]
... [86]
... [90]
... [91]
... [87]
... [88]
... [92]
... [89]
Page 42 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
20
ijkl
λ
ijkln
λ
n QQJJ λλ == , (10)
and simulates Boltzmann’s distribution constrained with λ
nJ and λ
ijklQ . Effectively, the
scaling means that the probabilities of microstates become more random than in the non-
scaled case. λ
E is then calculated using equation 5 with nominal (not scaled) values of
Js and Qs by taking a simple average over a sufficient number of the equilibrated
configurations. The aim of the scaling is to make the distribution more random without
decreasing the strength of the interactions. In our simulations, λ �was gradually increased
from 0 to 1 with a step of 0.025. The integral was calculated using Simpson’s method.
The configurational entropy was calculated with the equation
TEFS /)( −= (11)
where E is the average excess energy (or enthalpy) calculated with λ =1. Figure 9
shows the configurational entropy in the interval of 1073 – 3673 K. This function is
severely affected by SRO and LRO. Evidently, the cationic distribution tends to the one-
sublattice regime at low concentrations of majorite and at high temperatures. The two-
sublattice regime is observed only at very low temperatures and at very majorite-rich
compositions. The behaviour of the entropy at intermediate compositions cannot easily be
predicted from simple model assumptions. Figure 10 shows the free energy of mixing at
20 GPa in the same interval of temperature. The excess values are calculated with respect
to the mixture of pyrope and fully ordered majorite. One observes that the excess free
energy of mixing of majorite deviates significantly from zero only at temperatures above
2673 K. This is the effect of disorder in majorite. One can also see that the miscibility
gap starts to develop along the cubic-tetragonal boundary at about 2500 K and xmaj=0.8.
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: TimesNew Roman
Deleted: Eqn,
Deleted:
Deleted: the
Deleted: with the
Deleted: 8
Deleted: b
Deleted: function
Deleted: be
Deleted: 9
Deleted: excess free
Deleted: s
Page 43 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
21
At zero pressure this temperature is about 500 K lower. Curvature analysis of the free
energies, combined with the order-disorder analysis, permits the drawing of the T-X
phase diagram (Fig. 11)
‘[Insert fig. 9 about here]’
‘[Insert fig. 10 about here]’
‘[Insert fig. 11 about here]’
‘[Insert fig. 12 about here]’
2.7. Activity-composition relations
The free energy calculations suggest that the effect of disorder in majorite becomes
significant only above 2673 K, i.e. at temperatures significantly exceeding the
hypothetical mantle geotherm [3]. Therefore, we limit our activity-composition model to
the 1073 – 2673 K interval. We have extracted the excess free energies of mixing from
the Monte Carlo energies and fitted them with a Redlich-Kister polynomial of the 6th
order. Polynomials of lower order were not able to describe the curvature of the free
energy isotherms in the vicinity of the order/disorder transition.
‘[Insert table 5 about here]’
The fitting was performed separately with the data for 0 GPa and 20 GPa. The excess free
energies were calculated with respect to the ideal one-site molecular solid solution. Our
activities thus describe the mixing effect scaled to a single octahedral site. Table 5 plots
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Deleted: to
Deleted: 0…¶¶Deleted: Figure 8. The configurational entropy of the Deleted: ¶
Deleted: Figure 10. The temperature – composition phase Deleted: S
Deleted: olid black curve shows the result for 20 GPa, while the Deleted: designate
Deleted: represent the experimental results of Heinemann et Deleted: have
Deleted: showed
Deleted: n
Deleted: cubic and tetragonal symmetries, respectively. ¶
Deleted: (Gasparik, 2003).
Deleted: by
Deleted: Table 5. Coefficients of the Redlich-Kister polynomial
... [104]
... [99]
... [103]
... [100]
... [119]
... [101]
... [122]
... [118]
... [121]
... [102]
... [98]
... [93]
... [125]
... [94]
... [126]
... [97]
... [127]
... [123]
... [128]
... [124]
... [129]
... [105]
... [130]
... [106]
... [120]
... [107]
... [132]
... [108]
... [133]
... [109]
... [134]
... [110]
... [135]
... [111]
... [136]
... [112]
... [137]
... [113]
... [138]
... [114]
... [139]
... [115]
... [95]
... [116]
... [96]
... [117]
... [131]
Page 44 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
22
the coefficients of the Redlich-Kister polynomial for the calculation of the excess free
energy of the solid solution in the ranges of 1073-2673 K and 0 - 20 GPa. The Akn set
gives the coefficients corresponding to 0 GPa and the Bkn set gives the difference between
the Redlich-Kister fit at 20 GPa and 0 GPa. The free energies of mixing corresponding to
any pressure of interest in the range of 0-20 GPa can be interpolated using the Akn and Bkn
coefficients with the equation
∑ −−=7
1
11221excess
=n
n
n )x(xCxxG (13)
where
( )∑ −3
1
120/=k
k
knknn TPB+A=C (14)
and where T is measured in K and P in GPa. Equations 13, 14 will probably be
reasonably accurate at pressures slightly above 20 GPa. Figure 12 plots the activity-
composition relations at 20 GPa. The activities of pyrope and majorite are very much
perturbed by the cubic/tetragonal transition and by the miscibility gap, which develops
along the transition line. Comparing the Figures 10 and 11, one observes that the simple
polynomial equation is not enough robust for the description of the narrow gap at the
high temperatures. This drawback of the model would not be significant in the majority
of petrological applications though.
2.8. Equilibrium volume
The relaxed volumes of the 260 configurations have been calculated using GULP through
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Italic
Formatted: Indent: First
line: 0 pt, Line
spacing: Double
Deleted:
Deleted: Eqns.
Deleted: 1
Deleted: , however
Deleted: the
Deleted: in parallel with the
Page 45 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
23
energy minimization calculations. The excess volumes have been cluster expanded with
an equation analogous to Equation 5. This has made it possible to find a set of pair and
quaternary volumetric constants, which approximates the volume of any configuration.
These constants have been used to monitor the equilibrium volume during the course of
the Monte Carlo simulations and to calculate the average volumes along the binary at
different pressures and temperatures. Fig. 13 shows the result for 20 GPa and 2273 K.
The shape of the volume isotherm compares well with the measurements of Heinemann
et al. [11] performed on a series of samples synthesized at 19 GPa and 2273 K. The
predicted and experimental curves both show that the cubic/tetragonal transition leads to
a slight, but noticeable, increase in the volume. Heinemann et al. [11] observed the break
at xmaj=0.8, which is in very good agreement with the calculated value of xmaj=0.75.
‘[Insert fig. 13 about here]’
‘[Insert fig. 14 about here]’
3. Discussion
The developed statistical-thermodynamic model helps in understanding the driving forces
which make the tetragonal majorite more stable than other possible ordered structures
with the same composition. Table 4 shows that the strongest ordering pair interactions
occur at the 1st, 2nd and 3rd neighbor distances. The electrostatic origin of these forces
becomes clear when comparing the values of the Js corresponding to Al-Si, Al-Mg and
Mg-Si interactions. Obviously, the strength of the interaction correlates with the charge
difference within the pairs of cations: the Mg-Si interaction is always stronger than those
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Formatted: Indent: First
line: 0 pt, Line
spacing: Double
Deleted: the
Deleted: Eqn.
Deleted: permitted
Deleted: in
Deleted: 2
Deleted: (1997)
Deleted: (1997)
Deleted: about
Deleted: at
Deleted: a
Deleted:
Deleted: Figure 12. The variation of equilibrium volume along the binary at 2273 K and 20 GPa predicted with the volumetric cluster expansion.¶¶
aa
¶Figure 13. The arrangement of octahedral cations in I41/a (a) and P 4 32 majorites.¶Deleted: to
... [140]
Page 46 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
24
of Al-Si and Al-Mg. The arrangement of the octahedral cations can be easily visualized
as a BCC lattice, with two dissimilar cubic clusters centred on Si and Mg, respectively
(Fig. 14a). Although it is possible to design a structure (Fig.14b) with an even larger
number of the 2nd Mg-Si pairs than in I41/a majorite, it will have a too low number of the
3rd-neighbor Mg-Si pairs. Our calculations show that this structure, with a symmetry of P
41 32, is significantly less stable than the tetragonal majorite. The tetragonal majorite is
certainly the best choice considering the advantage of having the maximum number of
the third-neighbor Mg-Si pairs and a not too low a number of the second-neighbor pairs.
However, as it was noted above, the optimum configuration of the octahedral cations can
have a different relationship with regard to the underlying sublattice of the Si[4] atoms.
The stabilization of the tetragonal majorite relative to the alternative C/2c phase probably
occurs due to the interactions of the octahedral cations with the Si[4] atoms. In order to
understand these interactions, it is convenient to visualize the BCC lattice as a
superposition of the near-neighbor four-atom clusters of octahedral cations. One quarter
of these clusters contain a Si[4] atom in the middle and the other three quarters are vacant.
Our simulations suggest (Fig. 8) that the MgMgMgMg, SiSiSiSi and MgMgSiSi have a
greater affinity to the Si[4] atoms than MgMgMgSi, SiSiSiMg and MgSiMgSi clusters.
Since the centering of the first three clusters with a Si[4] atom is consistent with the four-
fold symmetry, the I41/a majorite is more stable than the C2/c majorite.
The present calculations constrain the phase diagram and the activity-composition
relations in the pyrope - majorite system at the conditions which cover the probable
stability range of majorite in the transition zone. The main question is how accurate these
calculations are. The predicted degree of LRO in tetragonal majorite (Fig. 7) is in good
agreement with the data of Phillips et al. [10] obtained on a sample prepared at 2000 °C
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Deleted: basic
Deleted: es
Deleted: centered
Deleted: with
Deleted: 3
Deleted: 3
Deleted: be in
Deleted: :
Deleted: s
Deleted: 7
Deleted: 6
Deleted: (1992)
Page 47 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
25
and 17.7 GPa. The sample of Angel et al. [9] synthesized at 1800 °C and 17 GPa falls
slightly outside the trend. However, the authors concede that the result of their X-ray site
occupancy refinement “must be treated with extreme caution because the scattering
factors of Mg and Si are very similar.” From bond lengths considerations they conclude
that the degree of Mg, Si order is probably larger than that obtained from site refinement.
The comparison of our results with those of Phillips et al. [10] and Angel et al. [9] is
valid only if the experimental data essentially represent equilibrium properties, i.e. if the
majorites were synthesized within the stability field of the tetragonal phase. However,
Hatch and Ghose [12], Heinemann et al. [11] and Tomioka et al. [15] argue that the
ordering to the tetragonal phase occurs during quenching such that the cubic/tetragonal
boundary would lie significantly lower than the temperature of synthesis, and certainly
significantly lower than our transition temperature (~3000 °C). The authors have based
their arguments on the observation of merohedral and pseudomerohedral twins generated
by the loss of symmetry elements due to the ordering transition. Such transformation
twins suggest that the majorites first crystallized with cubic symmetry. However, we will
argue that the mere occurrence of transformation twins may not necessarily imply that the
crystals have passed a transformation boundary during quenching. In fact, the metastable
formation of a higher symmetry disordered structure within the stability field of the low
temperature ordered form is not an unusual occurrence; it is to be expected if the starting
materials are reactive [51].
Two examples may be given. The first one concerns the 1/1 IC transition in Ca-rich
plagioclases. The ordering transition leads to an alternation of the Al and Si atoms and
thus produces superstructure reflections (so-called b-reflections) which may be used to
image type b anti-phase domains in the TEM. Note that in contrast to the ordering
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
Deleted: (1989)
Deleted: of
Deleted: T
Deleted: , however,
Deleted: (1992)
Deleted:
Deleted: (1989)
Deleted:
Deleted: (1989
Deleted: )
Deleted: (1997)
Deleted: (2002)
Deleted: o
Deleted: W
Deleted: , however,
Page 48 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
26
transition in majorite which is translationengleich, but klassenungleich and as such is
associated with the development of twins, the anorthite transition is klassengleich, but
translationenungleich so that anti-phase domains are generated. In natural anorthites (An
> 95%), although b-reflections are observed, no type b anti-phase domains can be
imaged. Obviously, these anorthites directly crystallized with the ordered stable 1I
structure. In contrast, anorthite samples synthesized below the melting temperature do
show type b domains although they crystallized in the stability field of the 1I phase [52,
53]. In the experiments of Kroll and Müller [53], the domains strongly increased in size
with annealing time. Therefore, they certainly did not develop during the quench lasting
only for seconds. This suggests that the synthetic anorthites first crystallized in a higher
symmetry phase ( 1C ) and only then developed the 1I -type ordering at the annealing
temperature. It is now agreed that also in natural anorthites with An-contents less than
95% showing type b domains nucleation of the domains occurred in a metastable 1C
albite matrix leading to the stable 1I structure without crossing a transformation
boundary (Smith and Brown [54], p.89).
Another well-documented example is the case of Mg-cordierite which when
synthesized from glass always forms the hexagonal high form (no long range order)
within the stability field of the orthorhombic ordered structure [55-58]. The first-formed
hexagonal phase has no domain structures. Continued annealing within the orthorhombic
stability field produces a modulated structure and ultimately a twinned orthorhombic
fully Al,Si ordered cordierite.
The discussion suggests that it is worth reconsidering the arguments of Hatch and
Ghose [12] and Heinemann et al. [11]. Although the occurrence of twins suggests the
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: English U.S.,
Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Highlight
Formatted: Indent: First
line: 14.2 pt, Line
spacing: Double
Formatted: Font: TimesNew Roman
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman, Highlight
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Deleted: Let us consider a phenomenon observed in the albite-anorthite system. It is well established (Carpenter and McConnell, 1984; Carpenter, 1991)
that the 1/1 IC order/disorder transition in pure anorthite would occur at about 2000 °C, a temperature significantly above the melting temperature (1553 °C). In contrast to the order/disorder transition in majorite, which is translationengleich, but klassenungleich and as such is associated with the development of twins, the anorthite transition is klassengleich, but translationenungleich such
Deleted: o
Deleted: that anti-phase domains are generated. The
1/1 IC transition leads to an alternation of Al and Si atoms and thus produces superstructure reflections h+k=odd, l=odd (so-called b-reflections) which may be used to image type b anti-phase domains in the TEM. In natural anorthites (An > 95%), although b-reflections are observed, no type b anti-phase domains can be imaged. Obviously, these anorthites directly
crystallized with the 1I anorthite structure. However, anorthite samples synthesized below the melting temperature do show type b anti-phase domains although they crystallized in the stability field of
Deleted: (1989)
Deleted: (1997)
... [141]
Page 49 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
27
existence of a cubic precursor, it is clear that the presence of twinning is not an indication
that the material had ever been within the stability field of the high symmetry phase. We
suggest that the cubic phase orders to the stable tetragonal phase immediately after
crystallization. The tetragonal phase is characterized by the prevalence of MgMgMgMg,
SiSiSiSi and MgMgSiSi tetrahedral clusters centred on Si[4] atoms. Presumably, during
the initial stages of growth the clusters form with equal probability around both the Si[4]
sites and the vacant sites leading to cubic symmetry and only then their proportion
changes in favour of the Si sites leading to tetragonal symmetry.
One can argue that the empirical potential calculations might not be sufficiently
accurate for predicting energy differences between configurations with different states of
order, and thus the calculated transition temperatures could be significantly off. The
comparison of our SLEC and ab initio calculations shows that the ab initio results suggest
a larger difference in the energies of cubic and tetragonal majorites. If we assume that the
ab initio values represent the correct answer, then the real energetic difference between
ordered and disordered majorites should be even larger than that predicted by the SLEC
and thus the cubic/tetragonal transition would occur at an even higher temperature than
we have here predicted. However, we observe that the present SLEC results are in very
good agreement with the data of Heinemann et al. [11], assuming that these data
constrain true equilibrium. The predicted enthalpies of mixing are in good agreement
with the available calorimetric data of Akaogi et al. [4] and Yusa et al. [5]: Fig. 6 predicts
that the enthalpy of mixing of a Maj60 sample synthesized at 1273 K is about 11 kJ
kJ/mol per 12-oxygen formula unit, which compares well with the value of 12 ± 3.0
kJ/mol, estimated for this composition by Yusa et al. [5]. This agreement suggests that
the present model is reasonably correct.
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman, Highlight
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font:
(Default) Times New
Roman, Complex Script
Font: Times New RomanFormatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font:
(Default) Times New
Roman, Complex Script
Font: Times New Roman
Deleted: centered
Deleted: with
Deleted: favor
Deleted: s
Deleted: a
Deleted: W
Deleted: , however,
Deleted: a
Deleted: (1997
Deleted: )
Deleted: (1987)
Deleted: (1993)
Deleted: 5
Deleted: molecule
Deleted: at
Deleted: (1993)
Deleted: about
Page 50 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
28
The present results might be questioned based on the lack of the evidence for a
miscibility gap in phase equilibrium studies. However, the miscibility gap could be
detected in a phase equilibrium study only if the both exsolved phases are stable at the
experimental conditions. Our phase equilibrium calculations for the pyrope-majorite
binary system (Fig. 15) suggest that the miscibility gap does not affect the topology of the
pressure-composition diagram at temperatures lower than 1600 °C. In these calculations,
aided with the Thermo-Calc program [59], we have used the thermodynamic database of
Fabrichnaya et al. [3] and the presently developed activity-composition model for the
garnet phase. The gap is absent in the 1773 K diagram because it occurs at compositions
that are not stable with respect to the other high-pressure mineral assemblages, such as
pyrope-rich garnet + clinopyroxene, garnet + wadsleyite + stishovite and garnet +
ilmenite. In the 2073 K set the gap is not revealed because at temperatures above 1873 K
our Redlich-Kister model does not reproduce the small inflection in the free energy of the
solid solution associated with the transition, although this inflection is present in the
Monte Carlo results. A narrow gap separating the cubic and tetragonal phases could be
possibly observed experimentally at about 1800 °C, where the majoritic garnet becomes
stable over a wide range of compositions. However, the experiments at such conditions
are extremely challenging.
‘[Insert fig. 15 about here]’
4. Conclusions
Atomistic simulations have allowed the investigation of the behaviour of mixing
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Indent: First
line: 0 pt, Line
spacing: Double
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Deleted: 4
Deleted: (Sundman et al., 1985
Deleted: )
Deleted: (2004)
Deleted: s
Deleted: the
Deleted: ,
Deleted: which
Deleted: in
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: ¶¶Figure 14. The phase relations in the Deleted: (a)
Deleted: and (b) 2073 K
Deleted: (b)
Deleted: .¶
Deleted: The a
Deleted: to
Deleted: e
Deleted: behavior
... [143]
... [142]
Page 51 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
29
functions in the pyrope-majorite system in great detail and thus to calculate the activity-
composition relations consistently with the cubic/tetragonal transition. The model
predicts that the transition occurs through a miscibility gap, which widens with the
decrease in the temperature. The calculations suggest that the gap does not affect the
topology of phase relations below 1600 °C, where the majorite-rich phase is not stable
with respect to other high-pressure mineral assemblages. However, if the mantle
geotherm rises above 1800 °C in the transition zone, it can cross the cubic/tetragonal
transformation boundary and the associated with the transformation narrow miscibility
gap. The heterogeneity of the garnet phase related to the miscibility gap and the twins
related to the cubic/tetragonal transformation might significantly alter rheological
properties of the lowest interval of the transition zone. These conclusions should be tested
for systems containing Fe and Ca.
Acknowledgements
The majority of the results included in this publication have been developed as
illustration materials for the lecture course “Introduction to Computer Simulations of
Minerals” read during the Spring semester 2005 at the University of Münster by AP and
VVL. Ulrik Hans, Jürgen Hansmann, Elis Hoffman, Arne Janßen and Dominik
Niedermeier are thanked for asking tough questions and for the help in the computation.
The support of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (grant Wi 1232/14-2) is greatly
acknowledged. JDG would like to thank the Government of Western Australia for
funding under the Premier’s Research Fellowship program.
Formatted: Line spacing: Double
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman, English U.S.
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Indent: First
line: 0 pt, Line
spacing: Double
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Deleted: However,
Deleted: t
Deleted: T
Deleted: suggest,
Deleted: however,
Deleted: ¶
Page 52 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
30
References
[1] G. Fiquet. Mineral phases of the Earth's mantle. Z. Kristallogr., 216 248 (2001).
[2] T. Gasparik. Phase diagrams for geoscientists. An atlas of the Earth’s interior.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (2003)
[3] O.B. Fabrichnaya, S.K. Saxena, P. Richet, E.F. Westrum.. Thermodynamic data,
models and phase diagrams in multicomponent oxide systems. Springer-Verlag,
(2004).
[4] M. Akaogi, A. Navrotsky, T. Yagi, S. Akimoto. Pyroxene-garnet transformation:
Thermochemistry and elasticity of garnet solid solutions, and applications to a
pyrolite mantle. In High-Pressure Research in Mineral Physics. M.H. Manghnani and
Y. Syono (Eds.). pp. 251-260, Am. Geophys. Union, Washington, D.C. (1987).
[5] H. Yusa, M. Akaogi, E. Ito. Calorimetric study of MgSiO3 garnet and pyroxene: Heat
capacities, transition enthalpies, and equilibrium phase relations in MgSiO3 at high
pressures and temperatures. J. Geophys. Res., 48, 6453 (1993).
[6] M. Akaogi, S. Akimoto. Pyroxene-garnet solid solution equilibria in the systems
Mg4Si4O4-Mg3Al2Si3O12 and Fe4Si4O4-Fe3Al2Si3O12 at high pressures and
temperatures. Phys. Earth Planet. Interiors., 15, 90 (1977).
[7] M. Kanzaki. Ultrahigh-pressure phase relations in the system. Phys. Earth Planet.
Interiors, 49, 168 (1987).
[8] T. Kato, M. Kumazawa. Garnet phase of MgSiO3 filling the pyroxene-ilmenite gap at
very high temperatures. Nature, 316, (1985).
[9] R.J. Angel, L.W. Finger, R.M. Hasen, M. Kanzaki, D.L. Weidner, R.C. Liebermann,
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted: Font: Italic
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: Akaogi, M., and Akimoto, S., 1977. Pyroxene-garnet solid solution equilibria in the systems Mg4Si4O4-Mg3Al2Si3O12 and Fe4Si4O4-Fe3Al2Si3O12 at high pressures and temperatures, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 15: 90-106.¶¶
Deleted: , M.…, A.… T.,…and , S., 1987
Deleted: : M.H. Manghnani and Y. Syono (Editors).
Deleted: ,
Deleted: .,… 251-260.
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: R.J.,
Deleted: , L.W.
Deleted: , R.M.
Deleted: , M.
Deleted: , D.L.
Deleted: R.C.,
... [150]
... [151]
... [149]
... [145]
... [147]
... [146]
... [153]
... [148]
... [144]
... [154]
... [152]
Page 53 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
31
D.R. Veblen. Structure and twinning of single crystal MgSiO3 garnet synthesized at
17 GPa and 1800 °C. Am. Mineral., 74, 509 (1989).
[10] B.L. Phillips, D.A. Howell, R.J. Kirkpatrick, T. Gasparik. Investigation of cation
order in MgSiO3-rich garnet using 29Si and 27Al MAS NMR spectroscopy. Am.
Mineral., 77, 704 (1992).
[11] S. Heinemann, T. Sharp, F. Seifert, D.C. Rubie. The cubic-tetragonal phase
transition in the system majorite (Mg4Si4O12) - pyrope (Mg3Al2Si3O12), and garnet
symmetry in the Earth's transition zone. Phys. Chem. Minerals, 24, 206 (1997).
[12] D.M. Hatch, S. Ghose. Symmetry analysis of the phase transition and twinning in
MgSiO3 garnet: implications to mantle mineralogy. Am. Mineral., 74, 1221 (1989).
[13] Y. Wang, T. Gasparik, R.C. Liebermann. Modulated microstructure in synthetic
majorite. Am. Mineral., 78, 1165 (1993).
[14] T. Gasparik. Phase relations in the transition zone. J. Geophys. Res., 95, 15751
(1990).
[15] N. Tomioka, K. Fujino, E. Ito, T. Katsura, T. Sharp, T. Kato. Microstructures and
structural phase transition in (Mg,Fe)SiO3 majorite. Eur. J. Mineral. 14, 7 (2002).
[16] R.J. Harrison, S.A.T. Redfern, J. Smith. The effect of transformation twins on the
seismic frequency mechanical properties of polycrystalline Ca1-xSrxTiO3 perovskite.
Am. Mineral., 88, 574 (2003).
[17] M.A. Carpenter, J.D.C. McConnell. Experimental delineation of the
1/1 IC transformation in intermediate plagioclase feldspars. Am. Mineral., 69, 112
(1984).
[18] E.R. Myers, V. Heine, M.T. Dove. Some consequences of Al/Al avoidance in the
ordering of Al/Si tetrahedral framework structures. Phys. Chem. Minerals, 25, 457
Formatted: Font: TimesNew Roman
Formatted: Font: TimesNew Roman, German Germany
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted: Normal,
Indent: Before: 0 pt,
Hanging: 18 pt, Line
spacing: Double
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Deleted: and
Deleted: , D.R.…, 1989.
Deleted: :
Deleted: -512.
... [156]
... [155]
... [159]
... [157]
... [160]
... [163]
... [161]
... [158]
... [162]
... [164]
Page 54 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
32
(1998).
[19] M.T. Dove. Computer simulations of solid solutions. In Solid Solutions in Silicate
and Oxide Systems of Geological Importance. EMU Notes in Mineralogy, 3. Ch.
Geiger (Ed.), pp. 245-249, Eötvös University Press (2001)
[20] A. Bosenick, M.T. Dove, E.R. Myers, E.J. Palin, C.I. Sainz-Diaz, B.S. Guiton, M.C.
Warren, M.S. Craig, S.A.T. Redfern. Computational methods for the study of
energies of cation distributions: applications to cation-ordering phase transitions and
solid solutions. Mineral. Mag., 65, 193 (2001).
[21] Warren, M.S., M.T. Dove, E.R. Myers, A. Bosenick, E.J. Palin, C.I. Sainz-Diaz,
B.S. Guiton, M.C. Craig, S.A.T. Redfern. Monte Carlo methods for the study of
cation ordering in minerals. Mineral. Mag., 65, 221 (2001).
[22] U. Becker, A. Fernandez-Gonzales, M. Prieto, R. Harrison, A. Putnis. Direct
calculation of thermodynamic properties of the barite/celestite solid solution from
molecular principles. Phys. Chem. Minerals, 27, 291 (2000).
[23] U. Becker, K. Pollock. Molecular simulations of interfacial and thermodynamic
mixing properties of the grossular-andradite garnets. Phys. Chem. Minerals, 29, 52
(2002).
[24] V.L. Vinograd, M.H.F. Sluiter, B. Winkler, A. Putnis, U. Hålenius, J.D. Gale, U.
Becker.. Thermodynamics of mixing and ordering in the pyrope-grossular solid
solution. Mineral. Mag., 68, 101 (2004).
[25] J.D. Gale. Empirical potential derivation for ionic materials. Phil. Mag. B, 73, 3.
(1996).
[26] J.D. Gale. GULP – a computer program for symmetry adapted simulations of solids.
J. Chem. Soc.: Faraday Trans., 93, 629 (1997).
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted: Font: Italic
Formatted: Font: Bold,Italic
Formatted: Font: Italic
Formatted: Font: Italic
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted
Formatted: Font: Italic
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: Font: Italic
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted
Formatted: Font: Bold
Formatted: Font: Italic
Deleted: ¶Bass, J.D., 1995. Elasticity of Minerals, Glasses, and Melts. In: Th.J. Ahrens (Editor) Mineral Physics & Crystallography. A Handbook of Physical Constants. Am. Geophys. Union, AGU Reference Shelf Ser., 2: 45-63. ¶¶
Deleted: , U.
Deleted: A.,
Deleted: M.
Deleted: , R.
Deleted: and
Deleted: , A.
Deleted: ,
Deleted: 2000.
Deleted: :
Deleted: -300.
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: U.,
Deleted: and
Deleted: , K.,
Deleted: 2002.
Deleted: :
Deleted: -64
Deleted: .
Deleted: ¶
... [168]
... [166]
... [165]
... [167]
... [169]
Page 55 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
33
[27] M.J. Sanders, M. Leslie, C.R. Catlow. Interatomic potentials for SiO2. Journal of the
Chem. Soc., Chem. Communications, 19: 1271 (1984).
[28] A. Patel, G.D. Price, M.J. Mendelsson. A computer-simulation approach to modelling
the structure, thermodynamics and oxygen isotope equilibria of silicates. Phys. Chem.
Minerals, 17, 690 (1991).
[29] B. Winkler, M.T. Dove, M. Leslie. Static lattice energy minimization and lattice
dynamics calculations on aluminosilicate minerals. Am. Mineral., 76, 313 (1991).
[30] V.L. Vinograd, M.H.F. Sluiter, B. Winkler, A. Putnis, J.D. Gale. Thermodynamics
of mixing and ordering in silicates and oxides from static lattice energy and ab initio
calculations. In First-Principles Simulations: Perspectives and Challenges in Mineral
Sciences. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Kristallographie. Berichte aus Arbeitskreisen der
DFK, 14. M. Warren, A. Oganov and B. Winkler (Eds), pp.143-151 (2004).
[31] J.D. Bass. Elasticity of Minerals, Glasses, and Melts. In: Mineral Physics &
Crystallography. A Handbook of Physical Constants. Am. Geophys. Union, AGU
Reference Shelf Ser., 2. Th.J. Ahrens (Editor), pp. 45-63 (1995).
[32] R.T. Downs, M. Hall-Wallace. The American Mineralogist Crystal Structure
Database. Am.Mineral.,88, 247.
[33] R.E.G. Pacalo, D.L. Weidner. Elasticity of majorite MgSiO3 tetragonal garnet. Phys.
Earth. Planet. Interiors, 99, 145 (1997).
[34] S.V. Sinogeikin, J.D. Bass. Elasticity of majorite and majorite-pyrope solid solution
to high pressure: Implications for the transition zone. Geophys. Res. Lett. 29(2), 4-1
(2002).
[35] P. Hohenberg, W. Kohn. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 136: B864.
(1964).
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted: Line spacing:
Double
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Indent:
Before: 0 pt, Hanging:
18 pt, Line spacing:
Double
Formatted
Formatted
... [171]
... [172]
... [173]
... [170]
... [174]
Page 56 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
34
[36] W. Kohn, L.J. Sham. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation
effects. Phys. Rev. 140: A1133 (1965).
[37] R.G. Parr, W. Yang. Density-functional theory of atoms and molecules. Oxford
University Press (1989).
[38] E.S. Kryachko, E.V. Ludena. Energy density functional theory of many-electron
systems. In Understanding Chemical Reactivity, 4, Kluwer Academic Publishers,
Dordrecht (1990).
[39] R.O. Jones, O. Gunnarsson. The density functional formalism, its applications and
prospects. Rev. Mod. Phys., 61, 689 (1989).
[40] J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof. Generalized gradient approximation made
simple. Phys. Rev. Lett., 77, 3865 (1996).
[41] T.C. Leung, C.T. Chan, B.N. Harmon. Ground-state properties of Fe, Co, Ni and
their monoxides: results of the generalized gradient approximation. Phys. Rev. B44:
2923 (1991).
[42] J. Goniakowski, J.M. Holdender, L.N. Kantarovich, M.J. Gillan, J.A. White.
Influence of gradient corrections on the bulk and surface properties of TiO2 and SnO2.
Phys.Rev. B53, 957 (1996).
[43] D.R. Hamman. Generalized gradient theory for silica phase transitions. Phys. Rev.
Lett. 76, 660 (1996).
[44] D.Vanderbilt. Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue
formalism. Phys. Rev. B41, 7894 (1990).
[45] G. Kresse, J. Hafner. Norm-conserving and ultrasoft pseudopotentials for first-row
and transition elements. J. Phys.: Condens. Matt. 6, 8245 (1994).
[46] C.A. McCommon, N.L. Ross. Crystal chemistry of ferric iron in (Mg,Fe)(Si,Al)O3
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted: Complex Script
Font: 12 pt, Subscript
... [175]
... [176]
... [181]
... [177]
... [182]
... [178]
... [183]
... [179]
... [184]
... [180]
Page 57 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
35
majorite with implications for the transition zone. Phys. Chem. Minerals, 30, 206
(2003).
[47] V.L. Vinograd. Configurational entropy of binary silicate solid solutions. In: Solid
Solutions in Silicate and Oxide Systems of Geological Importance. EMU Notes in
Mineralogy, 3. Ch. Geiger (Ed.), pp. 245-249 (2001).
[48] S.D. Fleming, A.L. Rohl. GDIS: A visualization program for molecular and periodic
systems. Z. Kristallogr. 220, 580 (2005).
[49] V.L. Vinograd, A. Putnis. The description of Al,Si ordering in aluminosilicates using
the cluster variation method. Am. Mineral., 84, 311 (1999).
[50] E.R. Myers. Al/Si ordering in silicate minerals. Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Cambridge.
(1999).
[51] M.A. Carpenter, A. Putnis. Cation order and disorder during crystal growth: some
implications for natural mineral assemblages. In Advances in Physical Geochemistry,
4, A.B.Thompson, D.C.Rubie (Eds.) Springer-Verlag (1985).
[52] M.A. Carpenter. Mechanisms and kinetics of Al-Si ordering in anorthite: I.
Incommensurate structure and domain coarsening. Am. Mineral., 76, 1110 (1991).
[53] H. Kroll, W.F. Müller. X-ray and electron-optical investigation of synthetic high-
temperature plagioclases. Phys. Chem. Minerals, 5, 255 (1980).
[54] J.V. Smith, W.L. Brown. Feldspar minerals. 1. Crystal structures, physical, chemical
and microtextural properties. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg (1988).
[55] A. Putnis. The distortion index in anhydrous Mg-cordierite. Contrib. Mineral.
Petrol., 74, 135 (1980).
[56] A. Putnis, D.L. Bish. The mechanism and kinetics of Al,Si ordering in Mg-
cordierite. Am. Mineral., 68, 60 (1983).
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Deleted: Bosenick, A., Dove, M.T., Myers, E.R., Palin, E.J., Sainz-
Deleted: , M.A.
Deleted: ,
Deleted: 1991.
Deleted: :
Deleted: -
Deleted: 1119.
Deleted: ¶Carpenter, M.A., and McConnell,
Deleted: , H.
... [193]
... [194]
... [204]
... [195]
... [219]
... [192]
... [220]
... [205]
... [191]
... [206]
... [202]
... [221]
... [203]
... [196]
... [207]
... [197]
... [208]
... [198]
... [209]
... [199]
... [210]
... [200]
... [211]
... [201]
... [212]
... [185]
... [213]
... [186]
... [214]
... [187]
... [215]
... [188]
... [216]
... [189]
... [217]
... [190]
... [218]
Page 58 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
36
[57] A. Putnis, C.A. Fyfe, G.C. Gobbi. Al,Si ordering in cordierite using "magic angle
spinning" NMR spectroscopy. I: 29Si spectra of synthetic cordierites. Phys. Chem
Minerals, 12, 211 (1985).
[58] A. Putnis, E.S. Salje, S.A.T. Redfern, C.A. Fyfe, H. Strobl. Structural states of
Mg-cordierite I: order parameters from synchrotron X-ray and NMR data. Phys.
Chem. Minerals, 14: 446 (1987).
[59] B. Sundman, B. Jansson, J-O. Andersson. The Thermo-Calc databank
system. Calphad, 9, 153 (1985).
Figure captions
Fig. 1. A plot of the predicted interatomic distances against the experimental data of
Angel et al. [9].
Figure 2. The feed-back algorithm which improves the accuracy of the cluster expansion
in predicting ground state configurations.
Figure 3. Correlation between the energies (a) and enthalpies (b) calculated with GULP
and predicted with the pair cluster expansion. The enthalpies were calculated at 20 GPa.
Figure 4. The I 41/a (a) and C 2/c (b) majorites viewed along the 4-fold axis of the
tetragonal phase. The tetragonal symmetry is lost when MgMgMgMg and SiSiSiSi
tetrahedral clusters move away from the centering Si[4] atoms. The image is prepared
using the GDIS software [48].
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Formatted
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: A.
Deleted: C.A.
Deleted: and
Deleted: G.C.,
Deleted: 1985.
Deleted: :
Deleted: -216.
Deleted: ¶
Deleted: A.
Deleted: E.S.
Deleted: S.A.T.
Deleted: C.A. and
Deleted: H.…,
Deleted: 1987.
Deleted: -454.
Deleted: ¶¶
Deleted: , B.
Deleted: , B.
Deleted: , J-O…1985.
Deleted: :
Deleted: -190
Deleted: Tomioka, N., Fujino, K., Ito, E., Katsura, T., Sharp, T.,
Deleted: Vanderbilt, D., 1990.
... [226]
... [224]
... [230]
... [222]
... [228]
... [239]
... [236]
... [240]
... [238]
... [232]
... [235]
... [244]
... [241]
... [234]
... [246]
... [243]
... [247]
... [223]
... [245]
... [242]
... [249]
... [248]
... [250]
... [225]
... [251]
... [227]
... [252]
... [229]
... [253]
... [233]
... [254]
... [237]
... [255]
... [231]
... [256]
Page 59 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
37
Figure 5. Correlation between the excess enthalpies calculated with GULP at 20 GPa and
predicted with the J-Q expansion. A similarly good correlation is observed for the
energies calculated at zero pressure.
Figure 6. Enthalpy of disorder predicted with Monte Carlo simulation (solid lines). The
dashed line shows the enthalpy at the complete disorder or infinitely high temperature.
Circles correspond to the excess energies of randomized configurations calculated with
GULP. All values are per formula unit with one octahedral atom (6 oxygens).
Figure 7. The temperature dependence of the long-range order parameter at 0 pressure
and 20 GPa as calculated from Monte Carlo simulations (circles). The cross and star
denote the experimental data.
Figure 8. The probability difference between two different four-atom clusters predicted
with the Monte Carlo simulations. Below the transition temperature the proportion shifts
in favour of the clusters consistent with the 4-fold symmetry.
Figure 9. The configurational entropy of the octahedral site (per 1 mole of octahedral
atoms) calculated using the method of thermodynamic integration. Dashed line shows the
ideal entropy.
Figure 10. The free energy of mixing and calculated using the method of thermodynamic
integration.
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Page 60 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
38
Figure 11. The temperature – composition phase diagram calculated based on the results
of the Monte Carlo simulations. (All other non-garnet phases are suppressed). The solid
black curve shows the result for 20 GPa, while the dashed line shows the phase
boundaries at zero pressure. The squares represent the experimental results of Heinemann
et al. [11]: open and filled squares correspond to the samples, which after the quench
showed cubic and tetragonal symmetries, respectively.
Figure 12. The activity – composition relations in the pyrope – majorite system consistent
with the excess free energies described by Equations 13, 14.
Figure 13. The variation of equilibrium volume along the binary at 2273 K and 20 GPa
predicted with the volumetric cluster expansion.
Figure 14. The arrangement of octahedral cations in I41/a (a) and P 41 32 (b) majorites.
Figure 15. The phase relations in the pyrope-majorite system at (a) 1773 K and (b) 2073
K.
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Complex Script
Font: Times New Roman,
English U.S.
Formatted: English U.S.
Formatted: English U.S.
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Deleted: Vinograd, V.L., Sluiter, M.H.F., Winkler, B., Putnis, A., Hålenius U., Gale, J.D. and Becker, U., 2004. Thermodynamics of mixing and ordering in the pyrope-grossular solid solution. Min. Mag., 68: 101-121.¶¶Wang, Y., Gasparik, T., and Liebermann, R.C., 1993. Modulated microstructure in synthetic majorite. Am. Mineral., 78:1 165-1173.¶¶
Page 61 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
39
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman, English U.S.
Formatted: Font: Times
New Roman
Deleted: Warren, M.C, Dove, M.T., Myers, E.R., Bosenick, A., Palin, E.J., Sainz-Diaz, C.I., Guiton, B.S., and Redfern, S.A.T., 2001. Monte Carlo methods for the study of cation ordering in minerals. Min. Mag., 65: 221-248.¶¶Winkler, B., Dove, M.T., and Leslie, M., 1991. Static lattice energy minimization and lattice dynamics calculations on aluminosilicate minerals. Am. Mineral., 76: 313-331.¶¶Yusa, H., Akaogi, M., and Ito, E., 1993. Calorimetric study of MgSiO3 garnet and pyroxene: Heat capacities, transition enthalpies, and equilibrium phase relations in MgSiO3 at high pressures and temperatures. J. Geophys. Res., 48: 6453-6460.¶¶¶
Deleted: ¶¶¶¶¶¶
Page 62 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 3: [1] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, Complex Script Font: 12 pt
Page 3: [2] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: 12 pt, Not Bold, Complex Script Font: 12 pt
Page 3: [3] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 3: [4] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, Complex Script Font: 12 pt, Superscript
Page 3: [5] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 3: [6] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/14/2005 2:35:00 PM
these pressure/temperature conditions
Page 3: [7] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 3: [8] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 3: [9] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 3: [10] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 3: [11] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 3: [12] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 3: [13] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: (Default) Times New Roman, Complex Script Font: Times New Roman
Page 3: [14] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 8: [15] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 2:10:00 PM
(2004b)
Page 8: [15] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 8:15:00 AM
, α−
Page 8: [16] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 8: [16] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 8:15:00 AM
Font: Italic
Page 8: [16] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 8:15:00 AM
Font: Symbol, Italic
Page 8: [16] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 63 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 8: [17] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:33:00 PM
then
Page 8: [17] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:33:00 PM
Page 8: [18] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 2:11:00 PM
(1995
Page 8: [18] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 2:11:00 PM
),
Page 8: [19] Formatted Victor Vinograd 11/21/2005 4:05:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Highlight
Page 8: [19] Formatted Victor Vinograd 11/21/2005 4:05:00 PM
Highlight
Page 8: [19] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 8: [20] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 5:09:00 PM
Table 1. The empirical interatomic potentials used in the present study. The
notation [4] and [6] refers to the coordination number of the associated species.
Buckingham
Interaction A (eV) ρB (Å) C (eV* Å6)
Al(core)-O(shell) 1262.2081 0.286370 0.0
Mg(core)-
O(shell)
1432.8544 0.277265 0.0
Si(core)-O(shell) 1073.4668 0.298398 0.0
O(shell)-O(shell) 598.8996 0.314947 26.89746
Spring
Interaction K (eV* Å-2 )
O(core)-O(shell) 56.5598
Three-body
Page 64 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Interaction kθQ (eV*degreerad-2 ) θ G ( degree)
O(shell)-Si[4]- O(shell) 0.77664 109.47
O(shell)-Si[6]- O(shell) 2.2955 90.0
O(shell)-Al[4]- O(shell) 1.2883 109.47
O(shell)-Al[6]- O(shell) 1.8807 90.0
Note: The charges on the oxygen core and shell are 0.746527 and -2.446527, respectively. Cutoff distance
for the Buckingham potentials is 12 Å.
Table 2. Structural data and elastic constants for majorite
Page 8: [21] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Subscript
Page 8: [21] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 8: [22] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: (Default) Times New Roman, Complex Script Font: Times New Roman
Page 8: [23] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [23] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [23] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [23] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [23] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [23] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [23] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [23] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [23] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [24] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 5:10:00 PM
as calculated with the SLEC and DFT GGA in
Page 65 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 8: [25] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 8: [26] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [27] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [28] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 5:10:00 PM
comparison with available experimental data.
Cell parameters
XRD SLEC DFT-GGA
a (Å) 11.501a; 11.481b;
11.519c
11.494 11.670
c (Å) 11.48a; 11.406b;
11.420c
11.392 11.561
a/c 1.0018 1.0089 1.0094
Volume (Å3) 1518.494 a 1505.040 1574.474
Atomic coordinates
XRDa SLEC
Core
DFT-GGA
x 0.1253 0.1256 0.1287
y 0.0112 0.0120 0.0135
Mg1 16f
z 0.2587 0.2623 0.2665
x 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
y 0.2500 0.2500 0.2500
Mg2 8e
z 0.6258 0.6227 0.6235
x 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
y 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Mg3 8c
z 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000
Page 66 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
x 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
y 0.2500 0.2500 0.2500
Si1 4a
z 0.3750 0.3750 0.3750
x 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
y 0.2500 0.2500 0.2500
Si2 4b
z 0.8750 0.8750 0.8750
x 0.1249 0.1261 0.1254
y 0.0065 0.0116 0.0116
Si3 16f
z 0.7544 0.7560 0.7568
x 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
y 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Si4 8d
z 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
x 0.0282 0.0257 0.0268
y 0.0550 0.0603 0.0588
O1 16f
z 0.6633 0.6685 0.6691
x 0.0380 0.0429 0.0447
y 0.9529 0.9540 0.9565
O2 16f
z 0.8562 0.8610 0.8611
x 0.2195 0.2248 0.2234
y 0.1023 0.1079 0.1069
O3 16f
z 0.8021 0.8070 0.8053
x 0.2150 0.2145 0.2117
y 0.9106 0.9161 0.9165
O4 16f
z 0.7000 0.7013 0.7028
x 0.9412 0.9353 0.9372
y 0.1617 0.1629 0.1638
O5 16f
z 0.4680 0.4690 0.4678
x 0.8960 0.8980 0.8977
Page 67 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
y 0.2080 0.2102 0.2153 O6 16f
z 0.7851 0.7821 0.7833
Interatomic distances
XRDa
(Å)
SLEC (Å)
Core
DFT GGA
(Å)
Mg1-O1 2.1209 2.0588 2.0940
Mg1-05 2.1303 2.0762 2.1344
Mg1-04 2.1533 2.1169 2.1631
Mg1-04 2.2500 2.2275 2.2179
Mg1-03 2.2668 2.2576 2.2701
Mg1-02 2.3319 2.3869 2.4922
Mg1-03 2.4334 2.4240 2.5286
Mg1-06 2.5823 2.6385 2.7487
Mg2-O5 2.1841 2.1481 2.1877
Mg2-O6 2.2379 2.2281 2.2372
Mg2-O1 2.3066 2.2651 2.3143
Mg2-O2 2.3848 2.3992 2.4702
Mg3-O4 1.9756 2.0355 2.0665
Mg3-O1 2.0049 2.0419 2.0809
Mg3-O5 2.0127 2.0663 2.0956
Si1-O5 1.6213 1.6446 1.6437
Si2-O6 1.6520 1.6384 1.6478
Si3-O1 1.6254 1.6225 1.6243
Si3-O4 1.6372 1.6259 1.6281
Si3-O3 1.6424 1.6705 1.6593
Si3-O2 1.6567 1.6845 1.6910
Si4-O2 1.7916 1.7420 1.7628
Page 68 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Si4-O6 1.7931 1.7835 1.8114
Si4-O3 1.8348 1.7909 1.8152
Elastic constants
Observed (GPa) SLEC (GPa)
C11 286.4d 295.10
C44 85.0d 85.23
C66 93.2d 93.66
C12 83.0d 112.7
C16 1.4d 14.72
Bulk modulus 159.8d; 166.0e 170.14
References: aAngel et al., 1989; bKato & Kumazawa, 1985; cHeinemann et al. 1997; dPacalo & Weidner,
1997; eSinogeikin & Bass, 2002;.
Page 8: [29] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 8: [30] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [30] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [30] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [31] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 8: [31] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 8: [32] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [32] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 69 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 8: [32] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [32] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [32] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [32] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [32] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [32] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [32] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [32] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [32] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [33] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 8: [34] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 8: [35] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [35] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [36] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 8: [36] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 8: [37] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [37] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [37] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [37] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [38] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 8: [38] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 8: [38] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 70 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 8: [39] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [39] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [39] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [39] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [39] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [40] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [40] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [40] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [41] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 71 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 72 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 73 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 74 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [42] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 75 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 76 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [43] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [44] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [45] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [45] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [46] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [46] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [46] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [46] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [46] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [46] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [46] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [46] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [46] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [46] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [46] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [46] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 8: [46] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 77 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 10: [47] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:44:00 PM
Page 10: [47] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:44:00 PM
,
Page 10: [47] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:44:00 PM
Page 10: [47] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:45:00 PM
the difference
Page 10: [47] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:45:00 PM
energies obtained with the
Page 10: [48] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 10: [48] Formatted Victor Vinograd 11/21/2005 3:39:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Highlight
Page 10: [49] Formatted Victor Vinograd 11/21/2005 3:39:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Highlight
Page 10: [49] Formatted Victor Vinograd 11/21/2005 3:39:00 PM
Highlight
Page 10: [50] Formatted Victor Vinograd 11/21/2005 3:39:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic, Highlight
Page 10: [50] Formatted Victor Vinograd 11/21/2005 3:39:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Highlight
Page 10: [50] Formatted Victor Vinograd 11/21/2005 3:39:00 PM
Highlight
Page 10: [50] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 10: [51] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:46:00 PM
4
Page 10: [51] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:46:00 PM
16
Page 10: [51] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:46:00 PM
56
Page 10: [52] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic
Page 78 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 10: [52] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 10: [53] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic
Page 10: [53] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 10: [54] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 1:57:00 PM
the
Page 10: [54] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 1:57:00 PM
inaccuracy of modeling interatomic interactions with
Page 10: [54] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 1:58:00 PM
or
Page 10: [55] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 2:00:00 PM
approximation
Page 10: [55] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 2:01:00 PM
Usually, the
Page 10: [55] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 2:02:00 PM
s
Page 10: [56] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 10: [56] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 10: [57] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 2:26:00 PM
It is possible that this overestimation could alter the relative energies of the calculated
structures.
Page 10: [57] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 2:40:00 PM
uncertainties
Page 10: [58] Formatted Victor Vinograd 11/21/2005 3:44:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Highlight
Page 10: [58] Formatted Victor Vinograd 11/21/2005 3:44:00 PM
Highlight
Page 10: [58] Formatted Victor Vinograd 11/21/2005 3:44:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Highlight
Page 10: [58] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Page 79 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Font: Times New Roman
Page 10: [59] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 2:49:00 PM
The a/c ratios and atomic coordinates calculated with the DFT GGA and SLEC are
consistent with each other and compare well with the measurements of Kato &
Kumazawa (1985) and Heinemann et al. (1997). The a/c ratio of Angel et al. (1989) is in
disagreement with the majority of more recent structural determinations (e.g.
McCommon and Ross, 2003).
Page 10: [60] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 2:36:00 PM
The atomic coordinates and bond distances predicted both by SLEC and DFT GGA
are in a very good agreement with each other and with the results of Angel et al. (1987).
Page 10: [60] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 2:36:00 PM
W
Page 11: [61] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Italic
Page 11: [62] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 11: [62] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic
Page 11: [62] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 11: [63] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 1:52:00 PM
initio calculations of the lattice energies of selected configurations.
Total energies
Structure Description Empirical
potentials
Ab initio
A Pyrope, d3Ia -247.9798 -4114.7275
B Majorite, I41/a -252.0903 -4797.7550
C Majorite, P4132 -252.0783 -4797.5994
D Majorite50, 3Ia -250.0309 -4556,1669
Page 80 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Energy differences
Reaction Empirical
potentials
Ab initio
D-(A+B)/2 0.0508 0.0744
C-B 0.1054 0.1556
Note: Values are in eV per octahedral atom
Page 11: [64] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 11: [65] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 11: [65] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 11: [65] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 11: [66] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 11: [67] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 11: [67] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 11: [67] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 11: [67] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 11: [67] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 11: [67] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 11: [68] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 11: [69] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 11: [69] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 81 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 11: [69] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 11: [69] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 11: [69] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 11: [69] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 11: [69] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 11: [69] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 11: [70] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 3:16:00 PM
zero K
Page 11: [70] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 2:33:00 PM
(1989)
Page 11: [71] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:49:00 PM
Page 11: [71] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:49:00 PM
In
Page 11: [71] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:49:00 PM
has
Page 11: [71] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:50:00 PM
first
Page 11: [71] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:50:00 PM
has
Page 11: [71] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:50:00 PM
ing
Page 11: [71] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:51:00 PM
,
Page 11: [71] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 1:51:00 PM
the next set of GULP
Page 82 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 14: [72] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 3:37:00 PM
,
Page 14: [72] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 3:37:00 PM
t
Page 14: [72] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 3:37:00 PM
its
Page 14: [73] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 3:45:00 PM
constrain
Page 14: [73] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 3:46:00 PM
a
Page 14: [74] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 3:37:00 PM
Our
Page 14: [74] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 3:37:00 PM
, however,
Page 14: [75] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 3:38:00 PM
with GULP
Page 14: [75] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 3:38:00 PM
d
Page 14: [76] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 5:16:00 PM
.
Pairwise energies
Mg-Al Al-Si Mg-Si Mg-Al Al-Si Mg-Si Distance
(Å) 0 GPa 20 GPa
4.9511 -13.849 -12.332 -32.350 -21.125 -21.611 -54.338
5.7178 -17.769 -16.637 -46.718 -20.852 -18.233 -51.553
8.0883 -9.239 -8.113 -16.804 -11.700 -9.697 -24.627
Page 83 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
9.4852 -6.203 -4.772 -8.486 -7.239 -4.259 -13.335
9.9072 -4.526 -3.923 -5.208 -7.152 -3.093 -8.592
11.4400 -2.321 -3.344 -5.148 -5.540 -6.009 -7.435
12.4676 -2.948 -0.165 0.664 -7.252 -3.375 -1.886
12.7916 -2.093 -1.855 -1.742 -4.913 -1.385 -2.286
The elastic term
Parameter 0 GPa 20 GPa
A12 610.85 906.51
A21 640.00 899.48
Quaternary energies
Cluster type 0 GPa 20 GPa
MgMgMgSi -3.8054 -4.0740
MgSiMgSi -12.7228 -14.4620
MgSiSiSi -3.3496 -4.3289
AlAlAlSi 2.7180 1.0271
AlAlSiSi 5.0292 3.2307
AlSiAlSi -2.0462 -3.1154
AlSiSiSi 1.6866 2.3576
AlAlAlMg -0.8564 -0.0710
AlAlMgMg 0.0363 2.2000
AlMgAlMg -6.4528 -6.8823
AlMgMgMg -1.7643 -2.1405
MgAlSiSi 2.1632 1.0320
MgSiAlSi -7.2655 -4.7004
AlSiMgMg -0.4698 0.0186
AlMgSiMg -5.8033 -7.8190
Page 84 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
MgSiAlAl 0.0 0.0
MgAlSiAl 0.0 0.0
MgMgSiSi 0.0 0.0
MgMgMgMg 0.0 0.0
SiSiSiSi 0.0 0.0
AlAlAlAl 0.0 0.0
Note: the values are in kJ per mole of octahedral cations, or per 1.5 moles of Si[4] atoms.
Figure 2. Correlation between the energies calculated with GULP and
predicted with the pair cluster expansion.
Page 85 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
a bSi[4] Si[6]
Mg[6]
a bSi[4] Si[6]
Mg[6]
Figure 3. The I 41/a (a) and C 2/c (b) majorites viewed along the 4-fold
axis of the tetragonal phase. The tetragonal symmetry is lost when
MgMgMgMg and SiSiSiSi tetrahedral clusters move away from the
centering Si[4] atoms. The image is prepared using the GDIS software
(Fleming and Rohl, 2005).
Page 14: [77] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [77] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [77] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [77] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [77] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [78] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Page 86 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [79] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [80] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [80] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [81] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [81] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Page 87 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Page 88 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 14: [82] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 17: [83] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/14/2005 1:18:00 PM
Page 89 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Figure 4. Correlation between the energies calculated with GULP and
predicted with the J-Q expansion.
Figure 5. Enthalpy of disorder predicted with Monte Carlo simulation (solid lines). The
dashed line shows the enthalpy at the complete disorder or infinitely high temperature.
Circles correspond to the excess energies of randomized configurations calculated with
GULP. All values are per
Page 17: [84] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 5:27:00 PM
formula unit with one octahedral atom (6 oxygens).
Page 19: [85] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 5:29:00 PM
Page 90 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 19: [85] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 5:29:00 PM
Page 19: [86] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 5:29:00 PM
Figure 6. The temperature dependence of the long-range order parameter
at 0 pressure and 20 GPa as calculated from Monte Carlo simulations
(circles). The cross and star denote the experimental data.
Figure 7. The probability difference between two different four-atom
clusters predicted with the Monte Carlo simulations. Below the transition
temperature the proportion shifts in favor of the clusters consistent with
the 4-fold symmetry.
Page 91 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 19: [87] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic
Page 19: [87] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:54:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 19: [88] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 2:44:00 PM
(Myers, 1999; Dove, 2001)
Page 19: [88] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:55:00 AM
λ−
Page 19: [89] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:55:00 AM
Font: Symbol
Page 19: [89] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:55:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 19: [90] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 6:04:00 PM
Note that the E0 term, i.e. the energy of the disordered state, contributes only to the F0
term, but is excluded from the integral.
Page 19: [90] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 6:06:00 PM
change
Page 19: [90] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 6:07:00 PM
due to the ordering
Page 19: [90] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/12/2005 6:11:00 PM
When varies between 0 and 1, λ
E∆ , varies from the state of complete disorder to the
state of equilibrium order at a given temperature.
Page 19: [91] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 3:53:00 PM
at the
Page 19: [91] Deleted Julian Gale 9/26/2005 3:53:00 PM
of
Page 19: [92] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:55:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 19: [92] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:55:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 21: [93] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/13/2005 10:06:00 AM
0
Page 92 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 21: [93] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 5:35:00 PM
Page 21: [94] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 5:35:00 PM
Figure 8. The configurational entropy of the octahedral site (per 1 mole
of octahedral atoms) calculated using the method of thermodynamic
integration. Dashed line shows the ideal entropy.
Figure 9. The free energy of mixing and ordering calculated using the
method of thermodynamic integration.
Page 21: [95] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 5:39:00 PM
Page 93 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Tem
pera
ture,
K
Mole fractionof majorite
I 41/aI a 3 d
Pyr Maj
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.01000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Tem
pera
ture,
K
Mole fractionof majorite
I 41/aI a 3 dI a 3 d
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.01000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Tem
pera
ture,
K
Mole fractionof majorite
I 41/aI a 3 dI a 3 d
Pyr Maj
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.01000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Tem
pera
ture,
K
Mole fractionof majorite
I 41/aI a 3 dI a 3 d
Page 21: [96] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 5:39:00 PM
Figure 10. The temperature – composition phase diagram calculated based on the results
of the Monte Carlo simulations. (All other non-garnet phases are suppressed). The s
Page 21: [97] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 5:39:00 PM
olid black curve shows the result for 20 GPa, while the dashed line shows the phase
boundaries at zero pressure. The squares
Page 21: [98] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 5:39:00 PM
represent the experimental results of Heinemann et al. (1997): open and filled squares
correspond to the samples, which after the quench
Page 21: [99] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 5:39:00 PM
cubic and tetragonal symmetries, respectively.
Figure 11. The activity – composition relations in the pyrope – majorite
system consistent with the excess free energies described by Eqns. 13, 14.
Page 21: [100] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Italic
Page 21: [101] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Indent: First line: 0 pt, Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [102] Formatted Victor Vinograd 11/21/2005 3:51:00 PM
Page 94 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Highlight
Page 21: [103] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [104] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 21: [105] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:37:00 AM
Table 5. Coefficients of the Redlich-Kister polynomial for the excess free energy in
the pyrope – majorite solid solution (all values are in kJ/mole of octahedral atoms)
N A1n A2n*10-3 A3n*10-6
1 20.7761 2.91736 -2.3053
2 -11.1357 19.77231 -5.979
3 -17.4504 22.02424 -4.9062
4 14.7575 -24.45104 8.7821
5 40.7301 -36.20679 8.1251
6 -13.7634 19.75529 -6.5512
7 -17.2006 10.69285 -1.4385
N B1n B2n*10-3 B3n*10-6
1 -0.6976 2.1641 -0.3205
2 3.1557 -0.0637 0.1517
3 -0.2216 9.8304 -3.9812
4 -16.0881 20.3068 -5.5879
5 -24.0941 1.1400 4.6094
6 23.0833 -26.5699 7.2069
7 37.4186 -16.7439 0.0
Page 21: [106] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [106] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 95 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 21: [107] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 21: [108] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [108] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [109] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 21: [110] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [110] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [111] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 21: [112] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [112] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [113] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 21: [114] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [114] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [115] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 21: [116] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [116] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [117] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 21: [118] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [118] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [119] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 21: [120] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [120] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [121] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 96 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 21: [122] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 21: [123] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [123] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [124] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 21: [125] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 21: [126] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [126] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [127] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 21: [128] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [128] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [129] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [129] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [130] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 21: [131] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [132] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [133] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, English U.S.
Page 21: [134] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [135] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 21: [136] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [137] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, English U.S.
Page 21: [138] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 21: [139] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 97 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 23: [140] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:42:00 AM
Figure 12. The variation of equilibrium volume along the binary at 2273
K and 20 GPa predicted with the volumetric cluster expansion.
a ba b
Figure 13. The arrangement of octahedral cations in I41/a (a) and P 41 32
majorites.
Page 26: [141] Deleted Victor Vinograd 11/22/2005 1:10:00 PM
that anti-phase domains are generated. The 1/1 IC transition leads to an alternation
of Al and Si atoms and thus produces superstructure reflections h+k=odd, l=odd (so-
called b-reflections) which may be used to image type b anti-phase domains in the TEM.
In natural anorthites (An > 95%), although b-reflections are observed, no type b anti-
phase domains can be imaged. Obviously, these anorthites directly crystallized with the
1I anorthite structure. However, anorthite samples synthesized below the melting
temperature do show type b anti-phase domains although they crystallized in the stability
field of the ordered 1I phase as did the natural samples (Kroll and Müller, 1980;
Carpenter, 1991). In the experiments of Kroll and Müller, glasses of anorthite
composition were crystallized at 1430 °C in runs lasting from 5 min to 16 days. Type b
domains could be imaged in all samples, the domain sizes strongly increased with time.
Therefore, the domains certainly did not develop during the quench which lasted only for
Page 98 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
seconds.
This suggests that the anorthites first crystallized in a higher symmetry phase ( 1C )
and only then developed the 1I -type ordering at the annealing temperature. Kroll and
Müller suggested that the domains nucleated independent of each other during growth of
the crystals immediately behind the growth front and subsequently coarsened with
annealing time. Their experiments show that the synthetic anorthites indeed had a higher-
symmetry precursor which in the feldspar case is definitely metastable. It formed in the
stability field of the 1I phase. It is now agreed that also in natural anorthites with An-
contents less than 95% showing type b domains nucleation of the domains occurred in a
metastable 1C albite matrix leading to the stable 1I anorthite structure without
crossing a transformation boundary (Smith and Brown, 1988, p.89).
The metastable formation of a higher symmetry disordered structure within the
stability field of the low temperature ordered form is not an unusual occurrence, it is to be
expected if the starting materials are reactive (Carpenter and Putnis, 1985). Another well-
documented example is the case of Mg-cordierite which when synthesized from glass
always forms the hexagonal high form (no long range order) within the stability field of
the orthorhombic ordered structure (Putnis, 1980; Putnis and Bish, 1983; Putnis et al.,
1985, 1987). The first-formed hexagonal phase has no domain structures. Continued
annealing within the orthorhombic stability field produces a modulated structure and
ultimately a twinned orthorhombic fully Al,Si ordered cordierite.
Page 28: [142] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:46:00 AM
Page 99 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 28: [143] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:46:00 AM
Figure 14. The phase relations in the pyrope-majorite system at (a) 1773 K
Page 30: [144] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 30: [144] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:21:00 AM
Font: Italic
Page 30: [144] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:22:00 AM
Font: Bold
Page 30: [144] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 30: [145] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:24:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 30: [146] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:27:00 AM
, M.
Page 30: [146] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:27:00 AM
, A.
Page 30: [146] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:27:00 AM
T.,
Page 30: [146] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:27:00 AM
and
Page 100 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 30: [146] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:27:00 AM
, S., 1987
Page 30: [147] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:30:00 AM
.,
Page 30: [147] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:29:00 AM
251-260.
Page 30: [148] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 30: [149] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:37:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 30: [149] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:37:00 AM
English U.S.
Page 30: [149] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 30: [150] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 30: [150] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:39:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, German Germany
Page 30: [151] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:39:00 AM
German Germany
Page 30: [151] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:39:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, German Germany
Page 30: [152] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:39:00 AM
German Germany
Page 30: [152] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:39:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, German Germany
Page 30: [153] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:39:00 AM
German Germany
Page 30: [153] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:39:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, German Germany
Page 30: [154] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:39:00 AM
German Germany
Page 30: [154] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:39:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, German Germany
Page 31: [155] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:39:00 AM
, D.R.
Page 31: [155] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:39:00 AM
, 1989.
Page 101 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 31: [156] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:39:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, German Germany
Page 31: [156] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [156] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:40:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic
Page 31: [156] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [156] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 11:40:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, Bold
Page 31: [157] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:25:00 PM
English U.S.
Page 31: [157] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [158] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [158] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [158] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [158] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:28:00 PM
Font: Italic
Page 31: [158] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:26:00 PM
Font: Bold
Page 31: [158] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:25:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [159] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:26:00 PM
German Germany
Page 31: [160] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [160] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [160] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [160] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:29:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic
Page 31: [160] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:29:00 PM
Font: Bold
Page 31: [160] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:28:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [160] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:29:00 PM
English U.S.
Page 31: [160] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:29:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 102 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 31: [161] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [162] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [162] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [162] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [162] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [162] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [162] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [162] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:34:00 PM
Font: Italic
Page 31: [162] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:33:00 PM
Font: Bold
Page 31: [162] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [163] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:41:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Italian Italy
Page 31: [163] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:41:00 PM
Italian Italy
Page 31: [163] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:41:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Italian Italy
Page 31: [163] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:41:00 PM
Italian Italy
Page 31: [163] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:41:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Italian Italy
Page 31: [163] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 31: [163] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:42:00 PM
Font: Italic, English U.S.
Page 31: [163] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:42:00 PM
English U.S.
Page 31: [163] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:42:00 PM
Font: Bold, English U.S.
Page 31: [163] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:42:00 PM
English U.S.
Page 31: [164] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 12:42:00 PM
German Germany
Page 32: [165] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:47:00 AM
Page 103 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Bass, J.D., 1995. Elasticity of Minerals, Glasses, and Melts. In: Th.J. Ahrens (Editor)
Mineral Physics & Crystallography. A Handbook of Physical Constants. Am.
Geophys. Union, AGU Reference Shelf Ser., 2: 45-63.
Page 32: [166] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 32: [167] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 32: [168] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 32: [169] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 33: [170] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:05:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, German Germany
Page 33: [170] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:05:00 PM
German Germany
Page 33: [170] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:05:00 PM
German Germany
Page 33: [171] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:46:00 PM
English U.S.
Page 33: [171] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:46:00 PM
English U.S.
Page 33: [171] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:45:00 PM
German Germany
Page 33: [171] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:48:00 PM
Font: Italic, German Germany
Page 33: [171] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:48:00 PM
Font: Italic
Page 33: [171] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:47:00 PM
English U.S.
Page 33: [172] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 33: [172] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 33: [172] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:52:00 PM
Font: Italic
Page 33: [172] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:52:00 PM
Font: Bold
Page 33: [172] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 33: [173] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Page 104 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Font: Times New Roman
Page 33: [173] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:54:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic
Page 33: [173] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:54:00 PM
Font: Italic
Page 33: [173] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:53:00 PM
Font: Bold
Page 33: [173] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 33: [173] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 33: [174] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:55:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, German Germany
Page 33: [174] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:55:00 PM
German Germany
Page 33: [174] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:55:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, German Germany
Page 33: [174] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 33: [174] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:56:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic
Page 33: [174] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 33: [174] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:56:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Bold
Page 33: [174] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 33: [174] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:56:00 PM
English U.S.
Page 33: [174] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, English U.S.
Page 34: [175] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [176] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:57:00 PM
Swedish Sweden
Page 34: [176] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 1:57:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [176] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:09:00 PM
English U.S.
Page 34: [176] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [177] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [177] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Page 105 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [177] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [177] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:10:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic
Page 34: [177] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:11:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Bold, Italic
Page 34: [177] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [177] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [178] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [178] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:12:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic
Page 34: [178] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [178] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:12:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Bold
Page 34: [178] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [178] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [179] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:13:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [179] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:13:00 PM
English U.K.
Page 34: [179] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:13:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [179] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:13:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [179] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:13:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic
Page 34: [179] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [179] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:13:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Bold
Page 34: [179] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [179] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [180] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [180] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Page 106 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [180] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [180] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [180] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:15:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic
Page 34: [180] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [180] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:14:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Bold
Page 34: [180] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [180] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [181] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:16:00 PM
Complex Script Font: 12 pt, Subscript
Page 34: [181] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:17:00 PM
Font: Italic
Page 34: [181] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:16:00 PM
Font: Bold
Page 34: [182] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [182] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [182] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:17:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic
Page 34: [182] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:17:00 PM
Font: Italic
Page 34: [182] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:17:00 PM
Font: Bold
Page 34: [182] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [183] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [183] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [183] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:18:00 PM
Font: Italic
Page 34: [183] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:18:00 PM
Font: Bold
Page 34: [183] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [183] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Page 107 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [184] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [184] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:19:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic
Page 34: [184] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [184] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:19:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Bold
Page 34: [184] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 34: [184] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 35: [185] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:20:00 PM
Font: Italic
Page 35: [186] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:20:00 PM
Font: Bold
Page 35: [187] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 35: [188] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:28:00 PM
Font: Italic
Page 35: [189] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:29:00 PM
Font: Bold, Italic
Page 35: [190] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 35: [191] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 35: [192] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:30:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic
Page 35: [193] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 35: [194] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:29:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Bold
Page 35: [195] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 35: [196] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 35: [197] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:30:00 PM
Swedish Sweden
Page 35: [198] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:30:00 PM
Swedish Sweden
Page 35: [199] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:30:00 PM
Font: Italic
Page 35: [200] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:30:00 PM
Page 108 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Font: Bold
Page 35: [201] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:31:00 PM
English U.S.
Page 35: [202] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 35: [203] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 4:23:00 PM
Bosenick, A., Dove, M.T., Myers, E.R., Palin, E.J., Sainz-Diaz, C.I., Guiton, B.S.,
Warren, M.C., Craig, M.S., and Redfern, S.A.T., 2001. Computational methods for
the study of energies of cation distributions: applications to cation-ordering phase
transitions and solid solutions. Min. Mag., 65:193-219.
Page 35: [204] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 35: [205] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:35:00 PM
Font: Italic
Page 35: [206] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:35:00 PM
Font: Bold
Page 35: [207] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:49:00 AM
Carpenter, M.A., and McConnell, J.D.C., 1984. Experimental delineation of the
1/1 IC transformation in intermediate plagioclase feldspars. Am. Mineral., 69: 112-
121.
Carpenter M.A. and Putnis A., 1985. Cation order and disorder during crystal growth:
some implications for natural mineral assemblages. In: Advances in Physical
Geochemistry, Vol.4, Eds: A.B.Thompson and D.C.Rubie. Springer-Verlag.
Hatch, D.M., and Ghose, S., 1989. Symmetry analysis of the phase transition and
twinning in MgSiO3 garnet: implications to mantle mineralogy. Am. Mineral.,
74:1221-1224.
Page 109 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Dove, M.T., 2001. Computer simulations of solid solutions. In: Ch. Geiger (Editor).
Solid Solutions in Silicate and Oxide Systems of Geological Importance. EMU Notes
in Mineralogy, 3: 245-249.
Fabrichnaya, O.B., Saxena, S.K., Richet, P., and Westrum, E.F., 2004. Thermodynamic
data, models and phase diagrams in multicomponent oxide systems. Springer-Verlag,
198pp.
Fiquet, G., 2001. Mineral phases of the Earth's mantle. Z. Kristallogr., 216:248-271.
Fleming, S.D. and Rohl, A.L. 2005. GDIS: A visualization program for molecular and
periodic systems. Z. Kristallogr. 220, 580-584.
Gale, J.D., 1996. Empirical potential derivation for ionic materials. Phil. Mag. B, 73, 3-
19.
Gale, J.D., 1997. GULP – a computer program for symmetry adapted simulations of
solids. J. Chem. Soc.: Faraday Trans., 93: 629-637.
Gasparik, T., 1990. Phase relations in the transition zone. J. Geophys. Res., 95: 15751-
15769.
Gasparik, T., 2003. Phase diagrams for geoscientists. An atlas of the Earth’s interior.
Page 110 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. 462pp.
Hamman, D.R., 1996. Generalized gradient theory for silica phase transitions. Phys. Rev.
Lett. 76: 660-663.
Harrison, R.J., Redfern, S.A.T., and Smith, J., 2003. The effect of transformation twins
on the seismic frequency mechanical properties of polycrystalline Ca1-xSrxTiO3
perovskite. Am. Mineral., 88: 574-582.
Hatch, D.M., and Ghose, S., 1989. Symmetry analysis of phase transition and twinning in
MgSiO3 garnet: implications to mantle mineralogy. Am. Mineral., 74: 1221-1224.
Heinemann, S., Sharp, T., Seifert, F., and Rubie, D.C., 1997. The cubic-tetragonal phase
transition in the system majorite (Mg4Si4O12) - pyrope (Mg3Al2Si3O12), and garnet
symmetry in the Earth's transition zone. Phys. Chem. Minerals, 24: 206-221.
Hohenberg, P., Kohn, W., 1964. Inhomogeneous electron gas. Phys. Rev. 136: B864-
B871.
Jones, R. O., Gunnarsson, O., 1989. The density functional formalism, its applications
and prospects. Rev. Mod. Phys., 61: 689-746.
Page 111 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Kato, T., and Kumazawa, M., 1985. Garnet phase of MgSiO3 filling the pyroxene-
ilmenite gap at very high temperatures. Nature, 316: 803-805.
Kanzaki, M., 1987. Ultrahigh-pressure phase relations in the system. Phys. Earth Planet.
Interiors, 49: 168-175.
Kohn, W., Sham, L.J., 1965. Self-consistent equations including exchange and
correlation effects. Phys. Rev. 140: A1133-A1138.
Kresse, G., Hafner, J. 1994. Norm-conserving and ultrasoft pseudopotentials for first-row
and transition elements. J. Phys.: Condens. Matt. 6: 8245-8257.
Page 35: [208] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 35: [209] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 35: [210] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
German Germany
Page 35: [211] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 35: [212] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, English U.S.
Page 35: [213] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 35: [214] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 35: [215] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 35: [216] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, English U.S.
Page 35: [217] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 112 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Page 35: [218] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, German Germany
Page 35: [219] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, German Germany
Page 35: [220] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 35: [221] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [222] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [223] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [224] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [225] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [226] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [227] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:42:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic
Page 36: [227] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [227] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:42:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Bold
Page 36: [228] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [228] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [229] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [230] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [231] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [232] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [233] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [234] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [235] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:43:00 PM
H.
Page 36: [235] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:43:00 PM
Page 113 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
,
Page 36: [236] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [237] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:44:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Italic
Page 36: [237] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [237] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:44:00 PM
Font: Times New Roman, Bold
Page 36: [237] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [238] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [239] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 4:27:00 PM
Sinogeikin, S.V., and Bass, J.D., 2002. Elasticity of majorite and majorite-pyrope solid
solution to high pressure: Implications for the transition zone. Geophys. Res. Lett.
29(2):4-1- 4-4.
Smith, J.V., Brown, W.L. 1988. Feldspar minerals. 1. Crystal structures, physical,
chemical and microtextural properties. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. 828pp.
Page 36: [240] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Indent: Before: 0 pt, Hanging: 22.5 pt, Line spacing: Double
Page 36: [241] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [242] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:44:00 PM
Swedish Sweden
Page 36: [243] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:44:00 PM
Swedish Sweden
Page 36: [244] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:44:00 PM
, J-O
Page 36: [244] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:44:00 PM
Page 114 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
1985.
Page 36: [245] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 36: [246] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: (Default) Times New Roman, Complex Script Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [247] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 4:24:00 PM
Tomioka, N., Fujino, K., Ito, E., Katsura, T., Sharp, T., and Kato, T., 2002.
Microstructures and structural phase transition in (Mg,Fe)SiO3 majorite. Eur. J.
Mineral. 14: 7-14.
Page 36: [248] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: (Default) Times New Roman
Page 36: [248] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Complex Script Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [249] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [250] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: (Default) Times New Roman, Complex Script Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [251] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [252] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Indent: Before: 0 pt, First line: 0 pt, Line spacing: Double
Page 36: [253] Deleted Victor Vinograd 10/17/2005 4:35:00 PM
Vanderbilt, D., 1990. Soft self-consistent pseudopotentials in a generalized eigenvalue
formalism. Phys. Rev. B41: 7894-7895.
Vinograd, V.L., and Putnis, A., 1999. The description of Al,Si ordering in
aluminosilicates using the cluster variation method. Am. Mineral., 84: 311-324.
Vinograd V.L., Sluiter, M.H.F., Winkler, B., Putnis, A., and Gale, J.D., 2004.
Thermodynamics of mixing and ordering in silicates and oxides from static lattice energy
and ab initio calculations. In: M. Warren, A. Oganov and B. Winkler (Editors). First-
Page 115 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960
For Peer Review O
nly
Principles Simulations: Perspectives and Challenges in Mineral Sciences. Deutsche
Gesellschaft für Kristallographie. Berichte aus Arbeitskreisen der DFK, 14: 143-151.
Page 36: [254] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman, English U.S.
Page 36: [254] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [255] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 7:56:00 AM
Font: Times New Roman
Page 36: [256] Formatted Victor Vinograd 10/18/2005 2:46:00 PM
Line spacing: Double
Page 116 of 116
http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tandf/jenmol
123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627282930313233343536373839404142434445464748495051525354555657585960