Thermal Enforcement Matt Reznicek Tim Croyle Scott Nedrow.

13
Thermal Enforcement Matt Reznicek Tim Croyle Scott Nedrow
  • date post

    19-Dec-2015
  • Category

    Documents

  • view

    216
  • download

    0

Transcript of Thermal Enforcement Matt Reznicek Tim Croyle Scott Nedrow.

Page 1: Thermal Enforcement Matt Reznicek Tim Croyle Scott Nedrow.

Thermal Enforcement

Matt Reznicek

Tim Croyle

Scott Nedrow

Page 2: Thermal Enforcement Matt Reznicek Tim Croyle Scott Nedrow.

Project Requirements

•Maintain Battery Pack at 100°F +-20°

•Provide responsive and accurate measurements of battery temperatures

•Be within budget of project ($3000)

•Have low impact on battery performance

Page 3: Thermal Enforcement Matt Reznicek Tim Croyle Scott Nedrow.

Initial State of ProjectData Acquisition Temperature Measurement

Page 4: Thermal Enforcement Matt Reznicek Tim Croyle Scott Nedrow.

Heating Concepts

1. Resistive Pad Heating

2. Convection Heating (i.e. Diesel Heater)

3. AC Internal Resistance Heating

Page 5: Thermal Enforcement Matt Reznicek Tim Croyle Scott Nedrow.

Resistive Pad Heating

Test 1: 60 Watt Pad on side of battery

Pros:

• Fast

• Easy

Cons:

• Expensive

• Not uniform

• Installation

Pad Heater 60W on Side of Battery

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Time (min)

Tem

p (

F)

Inside Middle Cell

Inside Outer Cell

Page 6: Thermal Enforcement Matt Reznicek Tim Croyle Scott Nedrow.

Resistive Pad HeatingTest 2: 60 Watt Pad underneath battery

Pad Heater 60W Unerneath Battery

70

75

80

85

90

95

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50

Time (min)

Tem

p (F

)

Outside on Long Side

Inside Top Temp

Inside Bottom Temp

Pros:

• Fast

• Easy

Cons:

• Expensive

• Not uniform

Page 7: Thermal Enforcement Matt Reznicek Tim Croyle Scott Nedrow.

Resistive Pad HeatingTest 3: 80 Watt Wrap-around Pad

Pros:

• Inexpensive

• Uniform Heating

Cons:

• Bulky

• Slow

• Acts as insulator

• Inefficient

Wrap Around 80W Heater

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

Time (min)

Tem

pera

ture

(F)

Inside Outer Cell

Inside Inner Cell

Page 8: Thermal Enforcement Matt Reznicek Tim Croyle Scott Nedrow.

Convection Heating

Cons:• Expensive ($2000+)• Slow• High air Temperatures• Quick cycle time

Pros:•Not Primarily Electric•Uniform Heating

Convection Heating testAmbient air at 195 F

6065707580859095

100105110

0 10 20 30 40 50

Time (min)

Te

mp

(F

)

Outside Temp

Inside Temp

Page 9: Thermal Enforcement Matt Reznicek Tim Croyle Scott Nedrow.

AC Current Heating

Pros:

• Uniform Heating• Low Power• Inexpensive• Very Fast

Cons:

• Circuit Design

AC Heating Test (60A 200mV)

70

72

74

76

78

80

82

84

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

Time (min)

Tem

p

Inside Temp

Outside on Short Side

Outside on Long Side

Page 10: Thermal Enforcement Matt Reznicek Tim Croyle Scott Nedrow.

Comparison

Heating Test Speed Power Draw Uniformity Feasibility Cost Average

Pad Heater on Side 2 3 4 1 4 2.8

Pad Heater Underneath 3 3 4 1 4 3

Pad Heater Wrap 4 4 2 4 2 3.2

Convection Heating 5 1 3 3 3 3

AC Resistance Heating 1 2 1 2 1 1.4

Page 11: Thermal Enforcement Matt Reznicek Tim Croyle Scott Nedrow.

Cooling Fan Test

Observations:• Somewhat Linear cooling• Faster than anticipated• Power draw of ~240 W• Air leaking past box lid

Page 12: Thermal Enforcement Matt Reznicek Tim Croyle Scott Nedrow.

Future Work

• More thorough cooling tests

• Get HEHMMWV mobile

• More AC internal resistance heating tests

• Circuit design for AC heating and cost analysis

• Troubleshoot LabView programming

Page 13: Thermal Enforcement Matt Reznicek Tim Croyle Scott Nedrow.

Questions?