There are two rules for success 1. Never reveal everything ...€¦ · Actuarial Liabilities and...
Transcript of There are two rules for success 1. Never reveal everything ...€¦ · Actuarial Liabilities and...
-
1
0
2015 LeadingAge Annual Meeting
Operational and Actuarial Strategies for Success
Session 73-ETuesday, November 3, 20153:30p – 5:00p
Operational and Actuarial Strategies for Success
There are two rules for success.....1. Never reveal everything
you know
Roger H. Lincoln 1
-
2
2
Speakers: Contact Information
Danny Eischen AV PowellChief Operating Officer/Executive Director PresidentConcordia Life Care Community AV Powell & Associates [email protected] [email protected]
Dan Gray Kathie HarrisPresident PresidentContinuum Development Services K Harris Consulting [email protected] [email protected]
Our Journey
3
-
3
Background Lutheran Senior Citizens formed in 1959 Concordia opened in Oklahoma City in 2007
4
Concordia Life Care Community
5
-
4
Background 96 IL, 37 AL, 16 MS, 30 NC Fairly rapid fill-up to 90% occupancy Charter members – 95% refundable lifecare;
most others 90% refundable lifecare Struggle to meet financial ratios each year Expansion plans considered
6
7
Operations Review Annual expense $10M Negative operating margin NOM 21%
110 FTEs Grounds, security, dining in-house Therapy, HR outsourced Management contract – accounting & marketing
support
-
5
8
Operations ReviewFavorable benchmarks/practices: AL productive hours of care/resident day < 2.2 AL with level of care packages; lifecare at base CMS 4-star rating NC private room differential > $50/day Average RUG rate > $425 Therapy Part B caseload > 5% IL, 10% AL, 20%
LTC NC
9
Operations ReviewFavorable benchmarks/practices: Square feet maintained/FTE > 50,000 Grounds costs/acre < $5,000 Square feet cleaned/FTE > 25,000 IL; 20,000
AL/commons; 8,000 NC Raw food costs/meal < $4 IL/AL; $3 NC
-
6
10
Operations ReviewUnfavorable benchmarks/practices: MS productive hours of care/resident day > 2.6 NC total hours of care/resident day > 4.7 Meals/labor hour < 2.25 IL/AL; 4.0 NC; 5.0 other Activity staffing > 1:50 AL; 1:35 MS/NC
11
Operations ReviewUnfavorable benchmarks/practices: Marketing cost % of expenses > 3% Perpetual monthly fee discounts Fundraising revenue < 4 times expense Employee turnover significantly > 30%
-
7
Key Recommendations Reduce employee turnover Onboarding, mentoring On-site HR
Increase fundraising Resident gifts to improve quality of life Job training grants Website stories and ability to donate
12
Key Recommendations AL/MS Reduce licensed nurse position on day shift Schedule med techs 12 hours/day rather than 16
Activities Reduce staffing, share among levels of care,
cover 7 days a week Part B vs Outpatient therapy Bill IL/AL residents under Part B license
13
-
8
Key Recommendations Dining services Reduce labor in NC by using nursing staff Share wait staff in IL/AL dining rooms Increase guest meal prices to cover meal costs Increase employee prices to cover raw food costs Reduce table linen usage Obtain liquor license Expand dinner hours to address capacity issues
14
Key Recommendations Lifecare contract Provide semi-private room in NC rather than
private room Actuarial study Assess financial impact of monthly fee discounts Test current contract pricing and develop
alternative contract options NC availability for short-term rehab
15
-
9
• Board objectives• Actuarial modeling results• Current situation• Related non‐financial issues• Pricing recommendations• Implementation strategy
ASOP#3 + OR Process to Resolve Financial Challenges ASOP#3 + OR Process to Resolve Financial Challenges
ASOP#3 + OR Process:Step 1ASOP#3 + OR Process:Step 1
Culture &Philosophy
Marketplace
ActuarialLiabilitiesand Costs
-
10
Board Sets Philosophical Objectives for SolutionsBoard Sets Philosophical Objectives for Solutions
• Adopt ASOP# solvency criteria• With sensitivity to marketplace
• Price new entrant contracts to mitigate risks Minimum refund Prepaid health care
Management Decisions are Aided by Actuarial ScienceManagement Decisions are Aided by Actuarial Science
• Develop alternative contracts that are actuarially equivalent
• What is the impact on projected health care usage?
• Will new contracts support transition from predominately 90% refundable contract
-
11
ASOP#3 + OR Process:Step 2ASOP#3 + OR Process:Step 2
ActuarialLiabilitiesand Costs
Culture &Philosophy
Marketplace
Current Situation:CCRC “not” in ASOP#3 SAB Current Situation:CCRC “not” in ASOP#3 SAB
78%106%
90%102%105% 110%
115%
0%
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
Funded Status Pricing Margin UFS Cash FlowsCase study AVP targets
-
12
Current Situation:Management Recognized Pricing Issues Current Situation:Management Recognized Pricing Issues
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
90% Refund 50% Refund 0% Refund
Residents Preferred 90% Refundable
90% Refund 50% Refund 0% RefundLegacy spread Actuarial spread
Refund Relationship Biased
Will New Pricing Options Support Cash Flows?Will New Pricing Options Support Cash Flows?
90% Refund
50% Refund
0% Refund
Baseline: Tier I Current 5.8% 11.0% 14.0%
Type A with couple equalization
Type B with 2 Options for MF After Transfer
Type C (fee‐for‐service)
Type D (Rental)
-
13
Price Actuarially Equivalent:Will higher margins be marketable?Price Actuarially Equivalent:Will higher margins be marketable?
90% Refund
50% Refund
0% Refund
Baseline: Tier I Current 5.8% 11.0% 14.0%
Type A with couple equalization 20.3 17.2 15.0
Type B with 2 Options for MF After Transfer 21.8 19.0 17.0
Type C (fee‐for‐service) 23.8 21.3 19.5
Type D (Rental)
Must Validate Contract Options with Cash FlowsMust Validate Contract Options with Cash Flows
50%
100%
150%
200%
250%
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Baseline Sensitivity #1 No change 90/80 Lifecare 90/80 FFE
-
14
SNF Capacity is Adequate:5 to 8 Beds Available for Direct EntrantsSNF Capacity is Adequate:5 to 8 Beds Available for Direct Entrants
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
ALU/MSU SNFCurrent Projected AVP 25th AVP 50th AVP 75th
ASOP#3 + OR Process:Next StepsASOP#3 + OR Process:Next Steps
ActuarialLiabilitiesand Costs
Marketplace
Culture &Philosophy
-
15
Actuarial/Operational Issues Increase 2nd person MF on original lifecare contracts
to generate actuarial surplus comparable to couple equalization Require additional $820/mo (80% increase) Projected 10-year reserve factor increase from 1.49 to
1.71 ($2M increase) if 50% convert to couple equalization benefit and 50% take fee increase
Address perpetual MF discounts Projected to decline from $400K annually to $290K in 2
years and $140K in 5 years28
Actuarial/Operational Issues NC bed availability is limited
IL contractholders are priority #1 AL/MS direct admissions are priority #2 Frequently turn away LTC private pay applicants
Continuum management Review health screening process Consider home care options to support residents in IL to
slow down transfers
29
-
16
Positioning for Future Success
30
Positioning for Future Success Contracts priced appropriately Expenses managed with best practice targets In-house HR, marketing expertise Board educated and engaged Continuum management philosophy must be
addressed
31
-
17
Audience Q/A
32