Theory of General Relativity - University of Colorado...
Transcript of Theory of General Relativity - University of Colorado...
Theory of General Relativity
• Expansion on the concept of Special relativity
• Special: Inertial perspectives are Equivalent
(unaccelerated)
• General: All perspectives are equivalent
Let’s go back to Newton
• F = G M1 M2 / R2
• F = ma
• When we solved this we “cancelled” the masses – why?
Why is the mass for gravity the same as the mass for
acceleration?
Equivalence
• Inertial mass = gravitational mass
• New thought: when in free fall – (an accelerating frame)
you feel weightless, but this is an inertial frame – or is it?
• Gravity = acceleration
General Relativity
• An accelerated environment is equivalent to a
gravitational environment
• Examples: An elevator going up –
A spaceship speeding up in
space
So what?
• This all seems obvious – but
work out the implications –
new Gedanken experiment
• Shine a light across the
elevator
But acceleration = gravity
• So a stationary elevator in a
grav field must produce the
same result –
• GRAVITY BENDS LIGHT ?!!
We can do this another way
• Light “falling” down a gravity
field gets blue shifted (gains
energy) while light going
“against” gravity gets
redshifted (loses energy)
Gravity Affects Light
• It also slows down clocks!
• Gravity “bends” light
• Light gains and loses energy as it moves through
gravitational fields
• Clocks in strong gravity move slowly
Light curves?
• How can light curve from gravity? – it has no mass
• How can it not travel in a straight line?
• New way of thinking – gravity is not a “force” as Newton
would describe it – it is a change in geometry
Geometry and Mass
• This is a revolution – the geometry of space-time is
changed by the presence of mass – light moves along a
geodesic in this altered geometry – the shortest distance
between two points
• Mass and space-time are linked
• This is a field theory – not a force theory
Einstein’s Theory
• G = 8G/c4 T
• English translation: Local Geometry (curvature) of space-
time is defined by the distribution of mass and energy (T)
Easy – right?
• This equation is so hard to solve, that a closed form
solution has only been done for a handful of extremely
simple cases
• Point mass, spherical mass, black hole – uniformly
distributed material in a homogeneous and isotropic
condition
Is it true?
• GR makes several testable predictions
bending of starlight
orbit of mercury
gravitational redshift
binary pulsar decay – gravitational radiation (gravity
does not act “at a distance”)
Cosmology, finally!
• Can solve G=8G/c4 T under the assumption of the
cosmological principle: theoretical cosmology
• Observations to test the predictions of the above:
observational cosmology
The real way
• Apply the cosmological principle to the universe: matter
and energy are uniformly distributed
• Solve Einstein’s Equations of General Relativity under
these assumptions
• We will not be doing this
Our Way
• Apply the cosmological principle –
• Solves Newton’s equations for such a circumstance
• Show the real relativistic answer (which is a little bit
different) and just accept it
Concepts needed
• Scale Factor: R(t)
• Co-moving coordinates (expand along with the universe)
distances between objects remain constant (D)
• Distance between two objects (freely expanding)
– Then: R(then) • D
– Now: R(now) • D
Concepts (continued)
• Scale factor changes with time (universe is
expanding/contracting)
• Rate of change of R =
• This can be thought of as speed
(there, you just did calculus!)
R
Newtonian Escape Velocity
• Consider a small particle (mass m) at the surface of a
sphere with mass M (M >> m)
• If the particle has kinetic of (1/2 m v2) equal to it
gravitational potential energy (GMm/R) then it could just
escape from the gravitational field (and have zero kinetic
energy when it got to R =
• Solving for v, we find:
v2 = ( 2GM/R) = escape velocity
(Newtonian)
Now consider the universe, expanding at a
rate
R
• Kinetic energy per unit mass
(energy density = (½ mv2 m = ½
v2) define this quantity as
• So (twice) the energy density of the
universe =
2 = 2
= 2GM/R + 2
[ - GM/R = ]
• What does this mean?
• Expansion of the universe is related
to its gravitational potential energy
at it’s “ kinetic energy at infinite
size”
R
Consider the possibilities2
= 2GM/R + 2 • As R gets larger, the 2GM/R
term gets smaller and smaller,
if < 0, then at some point,
= 0, and the expansion stops
(it never gets to R = )
• If = 0, then
gets smaller and smaller, and
the universe expands for ever,
but just barely
If > 0 it expands forever
R
R
R
Now lets get rid of M
• The mass of the universe
is just:
M = 4/3 R3 , where is
the mass density of the
universe
2= 8/3 G R2 + 2
R
Now – add Einstein
• If we had done the full relativistic solution:
2= 8/3 G R2 – kc2
k = curvature +1, -1, 0
since R just a scale factor, when can choose our coordinates to make k = one of these values
Friedmann Equation
R
Other changes in relativistic solution
• is the mass-energy density (not just mass)
• If = just mass this is a “standard model”
Standard Model Basics
• k = +1, positive curvature, closed universe (re-collapse)
• k = 0, flat curvature, open universe (expand forever)
• k = -1, negative curvature, open universe
The Hubble constant
• Remember: v = H0 • d (H0 = v/d)
• v = change in distance divided by change in time
= R(then)•D – R(now)•D / (t(then) – t(now))
v = ΔR•D/ Δt
continuing
• v = ΔR•D/ Δt
• H0 = v/d (d = R•D)
• H0 = [ΔR•D/ Δt] / R•D = [ΔR/ Δt] / R =
/R = H0
If we use R(today) and (today)
R
R
The Hubble “constant”
• The Hubble constant varies with time!
• It is the constant of proportionality between
speed and distance
• The ratio of /R = H at any time,
= H0 at the present time
R
Why I want to know H• Rearrange the equation:
2= 8/3 GR2 – kc2
H2 = 8/3 G - kc2/R2
If k=0, then =crit, and
crit = 3H2/(8G)
~ 10 H atoms/cubic meter
= / crit
R
Friedmann equation
2 = 8/3 GR2 – kc2
The rate of expansion (contraction) of the universe
is a function of its gravity and its curvature
k= curvature term, = 0, +1, or -1
(4/3R2 = M/R) where M is mass of the universe
If is the mass density
R
• = /crit where crit is the density necessary to just close
the universe
• When = 1 (by definition) k = 0
• = 1 + kc2 / (H2R2)
and curvature
• = 1 + kc2 / (H2R2)
Clearly:
if k = 0, = 1 for all time
if k = +1, > 1 for all time, but changes
if k = -1, ,< 1 for all time, but changes
New information
= -4/3GR + R/3
acceleration = -GM/R2 + mysterious new term
Is the cosmological constant, appears from Einstein’s
equations
Note that looks like in its application- a mass/energy
density
R
Two basic equations2
= 8/3 G R2 – kc2+ R2/3
Kinetic energy = gravitational energy – curvature of space + energy of vacuum
Or
Kinetic energy – gravitational energy – vacuum energy = - curvature
R
= -4/3GR + R/3
RAcceleration = gravitational force (attractive) + vacuum force
Two basic equations
ሶ𝑅
𝑅
2
= 8/3 G – kc2/R2+ /3
Kinetic energy = gravitational energy – curvature of space + energy of vacuum
Or
Kinetic energy – gravitational energy – vacuum energy = - curvature
ሷ𝑅
𝑅= -4/3G + /3
Acceleration = gravitational force (attractive) + vacuum force
Rules for Standard Cosmology
• Standard cosmology means mass dominates over energy, and the cosmological constant = 0
• Three cases:
k = -1, neg curve, < 1, expand forever, infinite
k = 0, flat curve, = 1, expand forever, infinite
k =+1, pos curve, > 1, collapses, finite
Observational cosmology is the attempt to measure these quantities,
now, and over cosmic time.
How fast is the
universe
expanding?
Is the rate of expansion
changing, and if so, by
how much?
How much mass is
there in the
universe?
What is the
curvature of
space –
positive,
negative or
flat?
Inferred by solving the
equations, I have no idea
what this actually is.
The Einstein Static universe
• 2 = 8/3 GR2 – kc2 + R2/3
• This is what Einstein got, and wasn’t very happy about it –
• He wanted = 0, and = 0 (static universe)
• This meant = 4G and k = 4GR2/c2
R
R
R
The Einstein Static universe
• No expansion, positive curvature, finite size – infinite in
time requires a specific value of the cosmological
constant
• But it is unstable – look what happens if you change R
What is ?
• Looks like an energy density – but it is constant – doesn’t go down as does
• A positive value for implies a force that wants to push the universe outward – an negative value wants to collapse the universe
• The R/3 term increases as R, gets more important as the universe expands – less important in a small universe
Any physics to all of this?
• can be interpreted as an energy density associated with
the vacuum: As space grows, there is more vacuum,
therefore more total energy associated with vacuum
• This is pretty hard to believe – certainly seems to violate
conservation of energy
New possibilities for a universe
• Unlike the standard model, the addition of the
cosmological constant alters the relationship between k,
, and the fate of the universe:
• De Sitter universe: no mass, positive cosmological
constant: exponential, scale free-expansion, no big bang
Steady State model -
• De Sitter Universe + matter
• Requires the constant creation of mass to keep the
product of R a constant
• No deceleration: H is unchanging throughout time – no
beginning or end –
• Perfect cosmological principle
• Disproved if the universe is accelerating or decelerating
A negative
• Causes all models to collapse, regardless of other factors:
as R increases towards infinity, always wins
LeMaitre Model
• Choose close to, but just off from crit = 4G
• This causes the universe to “hover” at a near constant
size for a long time, before expanding again
• Popular when the value of H0 was inconsistent with the
age of the earth