THEORIES ON ART &BEAUTY Plato-Aristotle-Tolstoy-.
-
Upload
aimee-whitaker -
Category
Documents
-
view
293 -
download
5
Transcript of THEORIES ON ART &BEAUTY Plato-Aristotle-Tolstoy-.
PLATO ON ARTClick icon to add picture
Found the arts threatening. He proposed sending the
poets and playwrights out of his ideal Republic, or at
least censoring what they wrote; and he wanted music
and painting severely censored.
The arts, he thought, are powerful shapers of
character. Thus, to train and protect ideal citizens for
an ideal society, the arts must be strictly controlled.
Although he approved of certain religious and moralistic
kinds of art. Again, his approach is related to his theory of
Forms.
Plato had a love-hate
relationship with the
arts.
Click icon to add picture
THE THEORY OF FORMS
Forms are perfect Ideals, but they are also more
real than physical objects. He called them "the
Really Real". The world of the Forms is rational
and unchanging; the world of physical appearances
is changeable and irrational, and only has reality to
the extent that it succeeds in imitating the Forms.
Plato saw the changing physical world as a
poor, decaying copy of a perfect, rational,
eternal, and changeless original.
A beautiful flower, for example, is a copy or imitation of the universal Forms "flower ness" and "beauty." The
physical flower is one step removed from reality, that is, the Forms. A picture of the flower is, therefore, two steps
removed from reality. This also meant that the artist is two steps removed from knowledge, and, indeed, Plato's
frequent criticism of the artists is that they lack genuine knowledge of what they are doing. Artistic creation, Plato
observed, seems to be rooted in a kind of inspired madness.
According to this theory, since art imitates physical
things, which in turn imitate the Forms, art is always a
copy of a copy (form), and leads us even further
from truth and toward illusion. (Which can be
dangerous)
According to this theory the artist, perhaps by divine
inspiration, makes a better copy of the True than may be
found in ordinary experience. Thus the artist is a kind of
prophet. Here are some features of the two theories:
P L ATO H A D T W O T H E O R I E S O F A R T
Poetry, drama, music, painting, dance, all stir up
our emotions. All of the arts move people
powerfully.
They can strongly influence our behaviour, and
even our character. For that reason Plato insisted
that art (especially music), along with poetry and
drama and the other arts, should be part of the
education of young citizens in his ideal republic,
but should be strictly censored to present, at first,
only the good.
1. Art is Imitation 2. Art is powerful, and therefore dangerous
PROBLEMS WITH THE IMITATION THEORY.
Click icon to add picture
With an artist like Jackson Pollack it leaves out everything; what do his drip paintings imitate? And how is the theory supposed to work for music? What does music represent? Plato spoke about music representing natural sounds, and emotions, as did Aristotle. But even if one agrees that music imitates emotions, could one build a theory of music out of this fact alone?
ARISTOTLE ON ART
Art is imitation, and that’s all right,
even good.
Art is defined by Aristotle as the
realization in external form of a true
idea, and is traced back to that natural
love of imitation which characterizes
humans, and to the pleasure which we
feel in recognizing likenesses.
Good art, is positive, constructive, and
should play an important role in social
life.
However art is not limited to
mere copying. It idealizes
nature and completes its
deficiencies: it seeks to
grasp the universal type in
the individual phenomenon
Imitation is natural to humans from
childhood, it is how children learn, and
we all learn from imitation.
Tragedy can be a form of education
that provides moral insight and fosters
emotional growth.
Tragedy is the imitation of certain
kinds of people and actions.
TOLSTOY ON ARTClick icon to add picture
Bio
Born 1828-1910
One of the immortal geniuses of European
literature.
Wrote, War and Peace& Anna Karenina
He underwent a deep religious conversion
and adopted a life of peasant simplicity
Leo Tolstoy’s What is Art? (1896) Is a
treatise concerning the nature and purpose
of art, describing how art can express
moral values
Tolstoy argues that there are two basic
means by which human beings
communicate with one another.
1) SPEECH- Men and Women
Communicate their thoughts through
speech.
2) ART- Men and Women Communicate
their feelings through art.
Tolstoy felt that feelings are
infectious. Example Laughter.
(Tolstoy describes art in this way)
“To evoke in oneself a feeling one has
experienced, and having evoked it in oneself,
then, by means of movements, lines, colors,
sounds, or forms expressed in words, so to
transmit that feeling that others may experience
the same feeling-this is the activity of art.”
“Art is a human activity consisting in this, that
one man consciously, by means of certain
external signs, hands on to others feelings he has
lived through, and that other people are infected
by these feelings and also experience them.”
-Tolstoy, What is Art?
The stronger the infectiousness the better the art is.
Tolstoy defines art in terms of its ability to communicate
concepts of morality. (Art does not produce beauty)
Art does not belong to any particular class of society. To
limit the subject matter of art to the experiences of a
particular class of society is to deny that art can be important
for all of society.
Good art is intelligible (understandable) and
comprehensible.
Bad art is unintelligible and incomprehensible. The more
that art restricts itself to a particular audience, the more
obscure and incomprehensible it becomes to people outside
that particular audience.
Tolstoy believes that art is good if it is judged to be good by
the majority of people. Indeed, he claims that a great work of
art is only great if it can be understood by everyone.