Theoretical Tools of Public Finance

Public Finance and Public Policy Jonathan Gruber Third Edition Copyright © 2010 Worth Publishers 1 of 44

Theoretical Tools ofPublic Finance

2.1 Constrained Utility Maximization

2.2 Putting the Tools to Work: TANF and Labor Supply among Single Mothers

2.3 Equilibrium and Social Welfare

2.4 Welfare Implications of Benefit Reductions: The TANF Example Continued

2.5 Conclusion

Public Finance and Public Policy Jonathan Gruber Third Edition Copyright © 2010 Worth Publishers

C H A P T E R 2 ■ T H E O R E T I C A L T O O L S O F P U B L I C F I N A N C E

theoretical tools The set of tools designed to understand the mechanics behind economic decision making.

empirical tools The set of tools designed to analyze data and answer questions raised by theoretical analysis. ---quantitative impacts

2 of 44

Addressing when should Govt. intervene andHow should govt. intervene



3 of 44

Constrained Utility Maximization

utility function A mathematical function representing an individual’s set of preferences, which translates her well-being from different consumption bundles into units that can be compared in order to determine choice.

constrained utility maximization The process of maximizing the well-being (utility) of an individual, subject to her resources (budget constraint).

models Mathematical or graphical representations of reality.

2.1



4 of 44


Preferences and Indifference Curves

2.1

FIGURE 2-1



5 of 44



indifference curve A graphical representation of all bundles of goods that make an individual equally well off. Because these bundles have equal utility, an individual is indifferent as to which bundle he consumes.

Indifference curves have two essential properties, both of which follow naturally from the more-is-better assumption:

1. Consumers prefer higher indifference curves.

2. Indifference curves are always downward sloping.

2.1



6 of 44



2.1

FIGURE 2-2



7 of 44


Utility Mapping of Preferences

Underlying the derivation of indifference curves is the notion that each individual has a well-defined utility function.

A utility function is some mathematical representation

U = f(X1, X2, X3, …),

where

X1, X2, X3, and so on

are the goods consumed by the individual and

f

is some mathematical function that describes how the consumption of those goods translates to utility.

2.1



8 of 44



Marginal Utility

marginal utility The additional increment to utility obtained by consuming an additional unit of a good.

This utility function described exhibits the important principle of diminishing marginal utility: the consumption of each additional unit of a good makes an individual less happy than the consumption of the previous unit.

2.1



9 of 44



Marginal Utility

2.1



10 of 44



Marginal Rate of Substitution

marginal rate of substitution(MRS) The rate at which a consumer is willing to trade one good for another. The MRS is equal to the slope of the indifference curve, the rate at which the consumer will trade the good on the vertical axis for the good on the horizontal axis.

/ M C

MRS MU MU

2.1



11 of 44



Marginal Rate of Substitution

2.1

FIGURE 2-4



12 of 44


Budget Constraints

budget constraint A mathematical representation of all the combinations of goods an individual can afford to buy if she spends her entire income.

opportunity cost The cost of any purchase is the next best alternative use of that money, or the forgone opportunity.

When a person’s budget is fixed, if he buys one thing he is, by definition, reducing the money he has to spend on other things. Indirectly, this purchase has the same effect as a direct good-for-good trade.

2.1



13 of 44


Budget Constraints

2.1

FIGURE 2-5



14 of 44


Putting It All Together: Constrained Choice

Marginal analysis, the consideration of the costs and benefits of an additional unit of consumption or production, is a central concept in modeling an individual’s choice of goods and a firm’s production decision.

2.1

FIGURE 2-6



15 of 44


The Effects of Price Changes: Substitution and Income Effects

2.1

FIGURE 2-7



16 of 44



Income and Substitution Effects

substitution effect Holding utility constant, a relative rise in the price of a good will always cause an individual to choose less of that good.

income effect A rise in the price of a good will typically cause an individual to choose less of all goods because her income can purchase less than before.

2.1



17 of 44



Income and Substitution Effects

normal goods Goods for which demand increases as income rises.

inferior goods Goods for which demand falls as income rises.

2.1



18 of 44

Identifying the Budget Constraint

2.2

FIGURE 2-8

Putting the Tools to Work: TANF and Labor Supply among Single Mothers



19 of 44

FIGURE 2-9

The Effect of TANF on the Budget Constraint

Effects of Changes in Benefit Guarantee

2.2




20 of 44


How Large Will the Labor Supply Response Be?

2.2

FIGURE 2-10




21 of 44


How Large Will the Labor Supply Response Be?

2.2

FIGURE 2-11




22 of 44

Equilibrium and Social Welfare

Demand Curves

welfare economics The studyof the determinants of well-being,or welfare, in society.

demand curve A curve showing the quantity of a good demanded by individuals at each price.

2.3



23 of 44


Demand Curves

2.3



24 of 44


Demand Curves

Elasticity of Demand

elasticity of demand The percentage change in the quantity demanded of a good caused by each 1% change in the price of that good.

2.3



25 of 44


Demand Curves

Elasticity of Demand

There are several key points to make about elasticities of demand:

They are typically negative, since quantity demanded typically falls as price rises.

They are typically not constant along a demand curve.

A vertical demand curve is one for which the quantity demanded does not change when price rises; in this case, demand is perfectly inelastic.

A horizontal demand curve is one where quantity demanded changes infinitely for even a very small change in price; in this case, demand is perfectly elastic.

The effect of one good’s prices on the demand for another good is the cross-price elasticity, and with the particular utility function we are using here, that cross-price elasticity is zero. Typically, however, a change in the price of one good will affect demand for other goods as well.

2.3



26 of 44


Supply Curves

supply curve A curve showing the quantity of a good that firms are willing to supply at each price.

marginal productivity The impact of a one unit change in any input, holding other inputs constant, on the firm’s output.

marginal cost The incremental cost to a firm of producing one more unit of a good.

profits The difference between a firm’s revenues and costs, maximized when marginal revenues equal marginal costs.

2.3



27 of 44


Equilibrium

market The arena in which demanders and suppliers interact.

market equilibrium The combination of price and quantity that satisfies both demand and supply, determined by the interaction of the supply and demand curves.

2.3



28 of 44


Equilibrium

2.3

FIGURE 2-13



29 of 44


Social Efficiency

Social efficiency represents the net gains to society from all trades that are made in a particular market, and it consists of two components: consumer and producer surplus.

consumer surplus The benefit that consumers derive from consuming a good, above and beyond the price they paid for the good.

2.3

Consumer Surplus



30 of 44


Social Efficiency

2.3

FIGURE 2-14

Consumer Surplus



31 of 44


producer surplus The benefit that producers derive from selling a good, above and beyond the cost of producing that good.

2.3

Producer Surplus

Social Efficiency



32 of 44


2.3

FIGURE 2-15

Producer Surplus

Social Efficiency



33 of 44


total social surplus (socialefficiency) The sum of consumer surplus and producer surplus.

2.3

Social Surplus

Social Efficiency



34 of 44


2.3

FIGURE 2-16

Social Surplus

Social Efficiency



35 of 44


Competitive Equilibrium Maximizes Social Efficiency

First Fundamental Theoremof Welfare Economics Thecompetitive equilibrium, wheresupply equals demand, maximizes social efficiency.

deadweight loss The reduction in social efficiency from preventing trades for which benefits exceed costs.

It is sometimes confusing to know how to draw deadweight loss triangles. The key to doing so is to remember that deadweight loss triangles point to the social optimum, and grow outward from there.

2.3



36 of 44


From Social Efficiency to Social Welfare: The Role of Equity

social welfare The level of well-being in society.

Second Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics Society can attain any efficient outcome by suitably redistributing resources among individuals and then allowing them to freely trade.

2.3



37 of 44



equity–efficiency trade-offThe choice society must makebetween the total size of theeconomic pie and its distribution among individuals.

social welfare function (SWF) A function that combines the utility functions of all individuals into an overall social utility function.

2.3



38 of 44



Utilitarian SWF

With a utilitarian social welfare function, society’s goal is to maximize the sum of individual utilities:

SWF = U1 + U2 + . . . + UN

The utilities of all individuals are given equal weight, and summed to get total social welfare.

2.3



39 of 44



Rawlsian Social Welfare Function

John Rawls suggested that society’s goal should be to maximize the well- being of its worst-off member. The Rawlsian SWF has the form:

SW = min (U1, U2, . . ., UN)

Since social welfare is determined by the minimum utility in society, social welfare is maximized by maximizing the well-being of the worst-off person in society.

2.3



40 of 44


Choosing an Equity Criterion

commodity egalitarianismThe principle that society should ensure that individuals meet a set of basic needs, but that beyond that point income distribution is irrelevant.

equality of opportunity Theprinciple that society shouldensure that all individuals haveequal opportunities for successbut not focus on the outcomesof choices made.

2.3



41 of 44

Welfare Implications of Benefit Reductions: The TANF Example Continued

2.4

FIGURE 2-17

Efficiency



42 of 44

Welfare Implications of Benefit Reductions: The TANFExample Continued

Governments have programs such as TANF because their citizens care not only about efficiency but also about equity, the fair distribution of resources in society. For many specifications of social welfare, the competitive equilibrium, while being the social efficiency-maximizing point, may not be the social welfare-maximizing point.

2.4

Equity



43 of 44

Conclusion

This chapter has shown both the power and the limitations of the theoretical tools of economics.

On the one hand, by making relatively straightforward assumptions about how individuals and firms behave, we are able to address complicated questions such as how TANF benefits affect the labor supply of single mothers, and the implications of that response for social welfare.

On the other hand, while we have answered these questions in a general sense, we have been very imprecise about the potential size of the changes that occur in response to changes in TANF benefits.

2.5

Theoretical Tools of Public Finance

Documents

Transcript of Theoretical Tools of Public Finance