Thematic Working Group - MSP Thematic Working Group - MSP Klaipeda, November 22th Andreas Möser,...
21
© 50Hertz Thematic Working Group - MSP Klaipeda, November 22th Andreas Möser, Lund University ©EnBW
Transcript of Thematic Working Group - MSP Thematic Working Group - MSP Klaipeda, November 22th Andreas Möser,...
© 50Hertz
Thematic Working Group - MSPKlaipeda, November 22th
Andreas Möser, Lund University
©EnBW
2
Outline
• High & Low OWP development
• Maritime Spatial Planning (MSP) • Sweden• Poland• Lithuania
• Scenario 1a and 3a• Draft layouts• GIS layouts
• Comparison 1a & 3a
• Scenario 2a• Draft layouts• GIS layout
Outline
CS1
3High/Low OWP visions
High OWP – Vision 2045
Swe
Lit
2035
Pol
Commissioning year
20402045
2030
2025
OWP capacity: 11.5 GW
1.5 GW
3.2 GW
5.1 GW
1.7 GW
• Project size/clustering pot.• Interconnection path• Presented OWF plans• Feasible future OWF
• Valid permits• Past/expired permits• 500m inward buffer (turbines)• 2km Natura2000 buffer
• Project size/clustering pot.• Interconnection path • Contact with Nerijus
4High/Low OWP visions
Low OWP – Vision 2045
Swe
Lit
Pol
2035
Commissioning year
20402045
2030
2025
OWP capacity: 6.7 GW
1.0 GW
2.3 GW
2.4 GW
0.9 GW
• Project size/clustering pot.• Interconnection path• Presented OWF plans (fewer)• Feasible future OWF
• Valid permits• Past/expired permits• 500m inward buffer (turbines)• 2km Natura2000 buffer
• Project size/clustering pot.• Interconnection path • Contact with Nerijus
5MSP – Overview
Swe
Pol
Lit
6MSP – Sweden
7MSP – Poland
8MSP – Lithuania
9
Scenarios
Scenario suggestion
Zero Integration
Partial Integration
Max. Integration
High OWP
Low OWP
High OWP
Low OWP
High OWP
Low OWP
Scenario 1a
Scenario 1b
Scenario 2a
Scenario 2b
Scenario 3a
Scenario 3b
Integration level
OWP level Scenario
Vision + Roadmap
Vision + Roadmap
Vision + Roadmap
Vision + Roadmap
Vision + Roadmap
Vision + Roadmap
10Scenario suggestion
(1a) Zero integration – High OWP – Vision 2045
Swe
2035
Pol
Commissioning year
20402045
2030
2025
OWP capacity: 11.5 GW
111a. High OWP, Zero integration – DC Overview
12
Scenarios
Scenario suggestion
Zero Integration
Partial Integration
Max. Integration
High OWP
Low OWP
High OWP
Low OWP
High OWP
Low OWP
Scenario 1a
Scenario 1b
Scenario 2a
Scenario 2b
Scenario 3a
Scenario 3b
Integration level
OWP level Scenario
Vision + Roadmap
Vision + Roadmap
Vision + Roadmap
Vision + Roadmap
Vision + Roadmap
Vision + Roadmap
13
(3a) Max integration – High OWP – Vision 2045
Scenario suggestion
Swe OWP capacity: 11.5 GW
2035
Commissioning year
20402045
2030
2025
143a. High OWP, Max integration – Overview DC system
15CS1: Sweden – Poland - Lithuania
Component comparison 1a and 3a
1a (Zero) 3a (Max) Difference
Converter substations 14 17 +21 %
DC cable length (km) 3 730 2 434 -35 %
DC conductor volume (km*mm2) 4.48*106 6.53*106 +46 %
OWP on DC system (GW) 5.1 11.5 +56 %
Onshore AC transformers 15 0 -100 %
AC export cable length (km) 1 093 374 -66 %
ScenarioFeature
Further analysis:
• Market flow in combination with wind patterns
• DC cable utilization factor
• Power flow control strategies
• DC protection zones
16Scenario suggestion
(2a) Partial integration – High OWP – Vision 2045
Swe
2035
Pol
Commissioning year
20402045
2030
2025
OWP capacity: 11.5 GW
172a. High OWP – Part integration – Zoom overview
18
For further information:
Mail: [email protected]
Web: www.baltic-integrid.eu
Baltic InteGrid represented by
the Lead Partner:
Institute for Climate Protection,
Energy and Mobility (IKEM)
Magazinstraße 15-16,
10179 Berlin, Germany
Phone: +49 (0) 30 408187015
Mail: [email protected]
Web: www.ikem-online.de
The content of the presentation reflects the author’s/partner’s views and the EU Commission and the
MA/JS are not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. All images are
copyrighted and property of their respective owners.
Contact & Disclaimer
May 16 2017Riga
Andreas MöserResearch Engineer
Box 118, SE-22100 Lund, SwedenPhone: +46 (0)46 222 97 31Mail: [email protected]: www.iea.lth.se
19
Extras
July 4 2017Berlin
20High/Low OWP visions
High OWP – 2045
Swe
Lit
2035
Pol
Commissioning year
20402045
2030
2025
4.2 MW /km2
4.8 MW/km2
5.2 MW /km2
3.8 MW /km2
OWP capacity: 11.5 GW
1.5 GW
3.2 GW
5.1 GW
1.7 GW
21High/Low OWP visions
Low OWP – 2045
Swe
Lit
Pol
2035
Commissioning year
20402045
2030
2025
4.8 MW /km2
5 MW/km2
5.4 MW /km2
4.0 MW /km2
OWP capacity: 6.7 GW
1.0 GW
2.3 GW
2.4 GW
0.9 GW
