The WTO SPS Agreement and its relevance to international standards

18
Health and Consumers The WTO SPS Agreement and its relevance to international standards Ella Strickland Head of unit European Commission, DG Health and Consumers Multilateral International Relations Unit 19 February 2014, Brussels

description

The WTO SPS Agreement and its relevance to international standards. Ella Strickland Head of unit European Commission, DG Health and Consumers Multilateral International Relations Unit 19 February 2014, Brussels. Why trade?. Economic advantages Creates jobs and promotes growth - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The WTO SPS Agreement and its relevance to international standards

Page 1: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

The WTO SPS Agreementand its relevance to international standards

Ella StricklandHead of unitEuropean Commission, DG Health and ConsumersMultilateral International Relations Unit

19 February 2014, Brussels

Page 2: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

Why trade?

• Economic advantages Creates jobs and promotes growth Greater variety of goods at lower prices to consumers Helps to reduce poverty Boosts competition Leads to specialisation and higher efficiency Spreads innovation

• Political advantages No trade restriction - no tension

Page 3: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

EU’s position in global trade

The EU is the world's largest trading block

Central pillar of the world economyBiggest market in the world - 500 million consumers Well-informed consumers looking for high quality productsCommitted to free trade – active participant in international foraOpen trade system - transparent rules Political capacity to conclude trade agreements

Page 4: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

World Trade Organization

Established on 1 January 1995 Succeeded GATT (General Agreement

on Tariffs and Trade) - 1948-1994 Bali – 1st new WTO agreement since

1995

Based in Geneva 159 Members Member-driven Decisions by consensus 30 negotiated agreements Dispute settlement

Page 5: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

WTO Agreements

12 specialised agreements on trade in goodsAgriculture

Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS)

Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)

Textiles and clothing

etc General agreement on trade in services Agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property

rights Agreement on dispute settlement Plurilateral agreements

Page 6: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

WTO SPS Agreement

In force since 1 January 1995

Sets out rules that WTO members are obliged to follow when they set SPS measures on food safety, animal health and plant health

Recognises Members' rights to impose SPS measures to achieve the appropriate level of protection (ALOP)

- if this level is higher than international standard, it must be supported by scientific evidence

Applies to all measures that may affect international trade Underlying objective is to promote stability and predictability in the system

Page 7: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

WTO SPS Agreement

Basic principles

SPS Measures shall be:» Transparent» Based on international standards» Based on scientific principles and risk assessment» Proportionate » Non-discriminatory» No more trade restrictive than necessary

Page 8: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

International standard-setting

WTO SPS Agreement encourages the use of standards developed by the international standard-setting bodies

The Three Sister Organisations:

• Food safety – FAO/WHO CODEX Alimentarius Commission• Plant protection – International Plant Protection Convention (IPPC) • Animal health – World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE)

Page 9: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

Why harmonize internationally?

• In order to facilitate trade by:

providing health protection based on scientific evidence avoiding market disturbances - stability facilitating investment ensuring consumers' confidence by ensuring high quality facilitating access to third country markets simplifying control procedures on the basis of

guarantees

Page 10: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

Decision-making in the WTO

Ministerial ConferenceGeneral CouncilCouncil for Trade in Goods

Technical Committees: SPS, TBT

Page 11: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

WTO SPS Committee

Meets three times per year

Forum to exchange information, raise trade problems, review the Agreement

Horizontal issues: ad hoc consultation, private standards, issues under the fourth review

The three sisters have observer status as well as a number of other organisations

Page 12: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

The work of the European Commission (DG SANCO/DG TRADE)

Works closely with EU stakeholders Ensures that EU legislation meets the obligations of the SPS

Agreement Tackles unjustified and unreasonable SPS barriers Requests bilateral discussions with third country authorities Raises specific trade concerns in the plenary meeting of the

SPS Committee Negotiates the chapter on SPS in international agreements Provides capacity building to developing countries Actively participates in the standard setting work of the three

sisters

Page 13: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

Transparency – SANCO responsibilities

DG SANCO is the EU SPS notification authority/enquiry pointAssists Member States to notify their SPS measures to the WTO Notifies any EU legislation which has an effect on international trade, responds to comments receivedDiscusses trade measures with partnersMonitors notifications (legislative changes) of other WTO membersMaintains records of all notifications via the SPS notifications database

Page 14: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

Trade concerns involving the EU

74 concerns raised by the EU since 1995

Examples:

BSE – against several countries, since 2004

Import ban on live animals – against Russia, raised in 2012

Schmallenberg virus – against several countries, raised in 2012

Page 15: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

Trade concerns involving the EU

73 concerns raised against the EU since 1995

Examples:EU temperature treatment requirements for imports of processed meat products – Russian FederationRestrictions on poultry exports – US

Page 16: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

Dispute settlement

Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) — the main WTO agreement on settling disputes

Not a quick-fix solution More than 450 disputes – in all areas - had formally been

raised until 15 November 2013 42 alleged violation of the SPS Agreement - 24 of which

resulted in the establishment of a dispute settlement panel These panels were established to look at 15 different SPS

issues

Page 17: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

Dispute cases when a panel was established

Canada and the United States' - against the European Communities' measures - meat and meat products (ban on meat treated with growth-promoting hormones);

European Communities - against Canada and the United States - their continued suspension of obligations relating to the EC-Hormones dispute;

United States - against the European Communities' measures - poultry meat and poultry meat products;

Canada – against the European Communities' measures – prohibiting the importation and marketing of seal products

Page 18: The WTO SPS Agreement and its  relevance  to international standards

Health andConsumers

Health andConsumers

Thank you for your attention!

• Useful Links:WTO • http://wto.orgDG SANCO •http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/health_consumer/index_en.htm