The Wildlife Society · Sultana Majid – Movement ecology of infection risk for California bighorn...
Transcript of The Wildlife Society · Sultana Majid – Movement ecology of infection risk for California bighorn...
The Wildlife Society
THE BRITISH COLUMBIA CHAPTER
2019 Conference and Workshop BC CONNECTIONS: OUR FUTURE
TOGETHER
March 1-3, 2019 Kelowna, British Columbia
1
Table of Contents
Welcome to the Inagural BCTWS Conference & Workshop ......... 2
Committees ....................................................................................... 3
Conference Sponsors ...................................................................... 4
General Information ......................................................................... 6
Schedule at a Glance ....................................................................... 7
Oral Presentations ......................................................................... 11
Poster Presentations ..................................................................... 29
Attachment 1:
Conservation Affairs Committee Session Info ............................ 32
2
Dear Participants of the Inaugural BCTWS Conference & Workshop,
We listened to your feedback on the Membership Survey, and as a result have built our annual conference to include many opportunities to meet, interact, and share information with other wildlife biologists from across the Province, while becoming better informed about current and changing provincial issues. To capture these concepts, we selected our conference theme of BC Connections: Our Future Together. We would also like to acknowledge that during our conference we are gathering on the traditional, ancestral, unceded territory of the Sylix/Okanagan people. The idea is to keep the meeting action-packed and intimate so that professional connections and lasting friendships can be easily made. We have included different forums for sharing and learning about hot topics across the province, including standard Open-Paper and Poster Programs and a Rapid-Paper Program. The Rapid-Papers will allow members to quickly communicate activities important to them, creating greater opportunities to stimulate discussion during breaks, and allow members to get to know one another and identify opportunities for collaboration. Scaling up from personal connections, we are excited to hear the keynote address from Jennifer Psyllakis Director of Wildlife and Habitat, Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development, “Insight & Vision: Navigating a Career in Natural Resource Management”. We are also looking forward to engaging with the fantastic panel we’ve assembled to discuss British Columbia’s developing Species-At-Risk legislation. And make sure you stay till the end when we will have an important discussion on how to have your voice represented provincially during a Conservation Affairs Committee discussion. The BCTWS takes the future of British Columbia’s wildlife seriously. We believe the greatest contribution we can make to secure our legacy is through support of our students and young professionals. It is clear to me you also share this sentiment, indicated by so many having readily volunteered to attend our “Speed-Networking Session.” We have been graciously supported by several fantastic organizations (pages 4-5), so please remember to thank them for their important contribution to our Chapter. You too can help British Columbia’s future wildlife students by grossly over-bidding on our silent auction items. Our intent is for this conference to be fun and engaging, so I hope you brought your positive energy and plan to enjoy yourselves while simultaneously building a community of forward-thinking and engaged wildlife biologists. I thank you for your attendance and appreciate you doing your part to build a lasting and vibrant BC Chapter of The Wildlife Society. Sincerely,
J. Scott Yaeger
President / 2019 Conference Chair BC Chapter of The Wildlife Society
3
Committees:
BCTWS Executive Team Conference Committee Chairs
• President – Scott Yaeger • Conference Coordination – Scott Yaeger
• President-Elect – Bill Harrower • Communications – Julie Kanya
• Secretary-Treasurer – Tyler Muhly • Fundraising – Myles Lamont
• Student Liaison – Agnes Pelletier • Panel discussion – Bill Harrower
• Director – Ashley Kerik • Paper Program – Bill Harrower
• Director – Pat Baird • Registration – Tyler Muhly
• Past President – Rod Davis • Student Awards – Adam Ford
• Communications Chair – Julie Kanya • Student Conclave and Mentorship –
Eamon Riordan-Short
• Student Liaison – Agnes Pelletier
• Volunteer Coordinator – Cayla Naumann
Special thanks to all the other volunteers that helped with the conference!
Conference Volunteers
Jeff Werner Alex Ritz Shea Carson
Sidhu Gurjot UBCO – Student Chapter Execs and members
4
We sincerely thank our sponsors for their generous contributions to help make this conference possible!!
Platinum Sponsors:
5
We sincerely thank our sponsors for their generous contributions to help make this conference possible!!
Gold Sponsors:
Bronze Sponsors:
6
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Venue: Royal Anne Hotel 348 Bernard Ave, Kelowna, BC V1Y 6N5 Hotel WIFI password is: rahotel348 Registration: The registration desk will be located in the hall between meeting rooms. The registration desk will be open: Friday, March 1st 10:00-12:00, Saturday, March 2nd 8am-830am, Sunday March 3rd 8am-830am. Lunch: Lunch will be served 12:15 – 1:45, Saturday, March 2nd in the Cutters Room. Buffet lunch is included for all registered participants. Refreshment Breaks: Coffee, tea, and snacks will be served in the Cutters Room during all networking breaks. Welcome Social and Poster Session: Please join us for the Welcome Social and Poster Session on Friday March, 1st in the Cutters Room 16:35 – 18:00. hors d’oeuvres and host/no-host bar included. Student/Professional Speed Networking Social: Speed-Networking session for professionals and students held 16:50 – 18:00 Saturday March, 2nd in the Cutters Room. Hors d’oeuvres and host/no-host bar included *Pre-registration required. Students and professionals will have a few minutes to introduce themselves, ask questions, and have a brief discussion. After ~5 minutes, students will move on to meet the next professional. Students can ask about graduate school or professional work (i.e., career paths, recommended experiences and/or expertise, etc.), or talk about common interests related to wildlife science and conservation. This is an opportunity for students to meet new contacts and for professionals to mentor and potentially find new collaborations. Silent Auction: Silent auction items will be displayed in the Ballroom during the conference. Participants are encouraged to bring items to donate for this fundraising auction. Proceeds help to defray the costs of this and future conferences for students and young professionals and ensuring maximum participation and professional development opportunities. Auction bids close Saturday, March 2nd end of day; winners to be listed at registration desk Sunday March 3rd 8:00am.
7
Schedule at a Glance: Friday March 1 Saturday March 2 Sunday March 3
Mor
ning
Act
iviti
es
10:00 – Registration opens
Mod
erat
or: A
shle
y K
erik
08:30 - 09:15 Rapid-fire talks
Mod
erat
or: J
oann
a va
n B
omm
el
8:30 - 9:05 Rapid-fire talks
09:15 - 09:35 Contributed research presentation
9:05 - 9:30 Contributed research presentation
09:35 - 10:05 Networking Break
9:30 - 9:50 Networking Breaks
10:30 – 12:00 Student conclave (Okanagan Ballroom) & Business Meeting (Similkameen Ballroom)
10:05 - 12:00 SAR panel discussion
9:50 -10:15 Contributed research presentation 10:15-11:20 Broad-scale collaboration discussion 11:20-11:50 Announce Awards 11:50-12:00 Closing remarks
Lunch
12:00-13:00 12:00 - 13:45 Buffet Lunch & Team Wildlife Competition
12:00 Adjournment
Afte
rnoo
n A
ctiv
ities
M
oder
ator
: Jan
elle
Col
e
13:00-13:20 Introductory welcome
13:20-13:45 Rapid-fire talks 13:45-14:05 Contributed research presentation 14:05-14:30 Rapid-fire talks
Mod
erat
or: J
eff W
erne
r 13:45 - 14:20 Rapid-fire talks
14:30-14:50 Contributed research presentation
14:20 -14:45 Contributed research presentation
14:50-15:15 Rapid-fire talks
14:45-15:05 Networking Break
15:15 -15:45 Networking Break
15:05 -16:45 Conservation Affairs Committee discussion (Attachment 1)
15:45-16:45 Keynote address 16:45-18:00 Poster session social: hors d’oeuvres and host/no-host bar
16:45 -18:00 Student/Professional speed networking
18:30 -No-host pub gathering Craft Beer Market 257 Bernard Ave, Kelowna; dinner on your own.
18:30 No-host pub gathering (Location TBD); Dinner on your own
*All general talks will be held in the Ballroom
8
Oral Presentations and Schedule of Events:
Friday March 1st 10:00 Registration Open
10:30 - 12:00 Student conclave (Okanagan Ballroom) 10:30 - 12:00 Business Meeting Similkameen Ballroom 12:00 - 13:00 Lunch - On your own 13:00 - 13:20 Introductory Welcome (Scott Yaeger)
13:20 - 13:45 Rapid-fire talks
Tyler Muhly – Response of wolves to human footprint across boreal Canada Jeff Werner – Landscape change & moose nutrition Felix Martinez-Nunez– Little Brown Myotis habitat use in Metro Vancouver Lorina Keery–Impact of bison reintroductions to Banff National Park
13:45 - 14:05 Contributed research presentation
Tony Button– Interim assessment protocol for moose – assessing and managing cumulative effects in British Columbia
14:05 - 14:30 Rapid-fire talks
Bill Harrower – Using expert knowledge to identify conservation outcomes and management options for wolverine (Gulogulo) in the north Garth Mowat – Sustainability of wolverine trapping Joanna Burgar - Evaluating camera trap surveys as an effective means of monitoring remote ungulate populations Stephen Symes – Guiding avoidance measures for Badger using winter space use
14:30 - 14:50 Contributed research presentation
Rich Weir – Identifying functional populations of fisher and wolverine for conservation and management
14:50 - 15:15 Rapid-fire talks
Heather Bryan – Variation in grizzly bear growth and body size Clayton Lamb – Genetic tagging in the Anthropocene: scaling ecology from alleles to ecosystems Aisha Uduman – Investigating leopard-livestock conflict in Sri Lanka Alexia Constantinou – Impacts of variable retention on mammalian wildlife Lauren Henson - Anthropogenic and landscape drivers of population genetic structure in grizzly bears on the central coast of BC
15:15 - 15:45 Networking Break 15:45 - 16:45 Keynote address
Jennifer Psyllakis, “Insight & Vision: Navigating a Career in Natural Resource Natural Resource Management”
16:45 - 18:00 Poster session social: hors d’oeuvres and host/no-host bar
End day 1 No-host pub gathering Craft Beer Market 257 Bernard Ave, Kelowna; dinner on your own.
9
Saturday March 2 08:00 Registration Open
08:30 - 09:15 Rapid Fire Talks
Emily Sunter – New directions in human-carnivore coexistence research Tyler Jessen – Contributions of Indigenous Knowledge to Wildlife Ecology and Evolution Kate Field –Safeguarding animal welfare via Publication reform Scott Yaeger –Targeting decision-makers to conserve fisher habitat Eamon Riordan-Short – Wildlife Photography, Citizen-Science, and You Kyle Artelle – Spatial assessment of grizzly bears and protected areas in the GBR Joanna van Bommel – Predictors of human-carnivore conflict on Southern Vancouver Island Adam Ford – Averting harmful outcomes in conservation
09:15 - 09:35 Contributed research presentation
Leah Ramsay- “Conservation Status Assessments 101 (or Lists, Bloody Lists)”
09:35 - 10:05 Networking Break
10:05 - 12:00 SAR panel discussion, “What everyone ought to know about British Columbia’s developing Species-at-Risk legislation” Facilitator: Bill Harrower
12:00- 13:45 Lunch break – Included buffet served on site & Team wildlife competition
13:45 - 14:20 Rapid Fire Talks
Mike Proctor- Re-establishing functional connectivity of grizzly bear
Sultana Majid – Movement ecology of infection risk for California bighorn sheep Cloe Wright –Behavior, demography & environmental change in mule deer of southern BC Lauren Eckert - Indigenous Knowledge and Environmental Assessment in Canada – implications for wildlife Nicole Botten - Is the nutritional quality of wildlife forage reduced by the persistence of glyphosate herbicide in plant tissues? Shea Carson – Career as a Wildlife Biologist or Zoologist- Why me?
14:25 - 14:45 Contributed research presentation
Michael Gillingham “Determining factors that affect survival of Moose in Central British Columbia”
14:45 - 15:05 Networking Break 15:05 - 16:20 Conservation Affairs Committee discussion
“Establishing our Future Conservation Priorities Together” Facilitator: Tyler Muhly and BCTWS executive (Attachment 1)
16:25 - 16:55 Social (Bar open) 16:55 -18:00 Student/Professional speed networking
18:30 No-host pub gathering (Location TBD); Dinner on your own
10
Sunday March 3, 2019 08:00 Registration open. Collect silent auction winnings.
08:30 - 09:05 Rapid Fire Talks
Kristen Mancuso – Overwinter Locations of Yellow-breasted Chats Breeding in Okanagan Jennifer Meineke – Biosolid Effects on vole populations and raptor and owl communities Ilona Mihalik –Costly signaling theory sheds light on motivations of big game hunters Edward Kroc – Promoting and Protecting Urban Nesters, Migrants, and Residents Jesse Zeman – Funding wildlife management Toby St Clair – Novel methods for bat surveys in Metro Vancouver
09:05 - 09:30 Contributed research presentation
Robin Naidoo “Recreational impacts on wildlife in the South Chilcotin Mountains, BC”
09:30 - 09:50 Networking Breaks 09:50 - 10:15 Contributed research presentation
Erin Tattersall – Large mammal dynamics on a boreal working landscape
10:15 - 11:20 Broad-scale collaboration discussion (What do you want from BC TWS? Get Involved) Facilitator: Scott Yaeger
11:20 -11:50 Announce Awards 11:50 -12:00 Closing remarks (Scott Yaeger) 12:00 Adjourn
11
Oral Presentations (In Alphabetical Order)
Artelle K.A.1, M. L. Bourbonnais, J. D. Reynolds, P. C. Paquet, M. S. Adams, H. M. Bryan, K. A. Field, C. N.
Service, and C. T. Darimont
1 Postdoctoral Fellow University of Victoria, Victoria BC,&Raincoast Conservation Foundation, Sydney BC,
Using culturally important focal species to inform conservation: spatial assessment of grizzly bears
and protected areas in the Great Bear Rainforest
The need for conservation that addresses both ecological and cultural dimensions is increasingly being
recognized. We illustrate how species of high cultural importance provide opportunities for addressing
both, focusing on grizzly bears (Ursusarctos horribilis), which have significant cultural and ecological
importance. Specifically, we conducted spatial capture-recapture modeling on data from a non-invasive
monitoring project that spans territories of, and is run in partnership with, the Haíɫzaqv,
Kitasoo/Xai’xais, Wuikinuxv, and Nuxalk First Nations. We characterized the density of grizzly bear
activity centres from 2014-2017 across a 28,500 km2 study boundary and identified hotspots as: 1) areas
with activity centre densities in the 90th percentile, or 2) significant spatial congregations of high activity
centre densities, identified by the Getis-OrdGi* statistic. We found gaps in the overlap between hotspots
and existing protections under of the ‘Great Bear Rainforest Agreement’: over half of 1) male (59%) and
female (52%) upper percentile hotspot area and 2) male (56%) and female (51%) Gi* hotspot area
remain unprotected under current land use designations. These results identify potential conservation
gaps, identify areas where additional protection might provide particular benefit, and more broadly
illustrate the potential benefits from empirical inquiry on the stewardship of culturally important
wildlife.
Botten N.1
1MSc Candidate, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George BC,[email protected]
Is the nutritional quality of wildlife forage reduced by the persistence of glyphosate herbicide in plant
tissues?
Glyphosate, the most widely used herbicide worldwide, is the top choice for use on BC’s forests after
harvesting, to prevent competition for commercially-significant conifers. When glyphosate is sprayed on
forest cut blocks, various factors result in some plants receiving a sublethal dose. Surviving plants may
store and translocate glyphosate molecules within their tissues, and glyphosate may thus persist in plant
tissues for an extended duration of time. I am investigating the duration of glyphosate persistence in
plant tissues, by analyzing the shoot and root tissues of 6 species of perennial forest plants that I
collected last summer in forest cut blocks sprayed with GBH over a period of time ranging from 1 to 12
years ago. Mammals such as moose and bears are known to frequent recently-logged areas in search for
preferred foods. A known chelating agent, glyphosate readily binds to certain metal ions, a property
that may have a negative effect on the bioavailability of key nutrients in glyphosate-containing plants. It
is this effect that glyphosate may have on nutritional quality of wildlife forage that I will be further
investigating. The results of my research will be of use to forest and wildlife managers in the vegetation-
management decision-making process.
12
Bryan H. A.1, Bateman, M. Adams, J. Ehlers, T. Levi, G. Mowat, P. Paquet, and C. Darimont
1Raincoast-Mitacs Postdoctoral Scholar, University of Victoria, Victoria BC, and Raincoast Conservation
Foundation, Sydney BC,[email protected]
Temporal variation in grizzly bear growth and body size reveals large-scale phenotypic change across
British Columbia
Growth and body size are fundamental life history traits that are shaped by individual and
environmental conditions. Examining variation in growth trajectories over time may therefore provide
insight into the responses of populations to environmental change. Accordingly, we examined temporal
trends in grizzly bear skull size (width and length) using a dataset of bears killed in British Columbia
between 1973 and 2006 (n = 6723). By applying novel incremental growth models, we found that bears
born in 2006 grew faster and reached 95% asymptotic body size (a proxy for age at first reproduction) at
an earlier age compared with bears born in 1973. These findings suggest that large-scale processes
affect bear phenotypes. Our analysis also revealed that bears in warmer climates are larger and grow
faster compared with bears in cooler climates. This trend may reflect the nutritional benefits of living in
warmer climates with higher productivity of herbaceous foods. Collectively, these results provide
insights into the environmental conditions that influence phenotypic traits, which in turn may help
predict the consequences of environmental change on wildlife.
Burgar J.1, J. Fisher, and C. Burton
1 Postdoctoral researcher, University of Victoria, Victoria BC, and University of British Columbia,
Vancouver BC, [email protected]
Evaluating camera trap surveys as an effective means of monitoring remote ungulate populations.
Camera trap surveys are increasingly being used for wildlife monitoring but their effectiveness at
monitoring remote ungulate populations has yet to be determined. To do so we are conducting a multi-
year camera trap study within a caribou range affected by wildfire and anthropogenic disturbance. We
deployed 58 cameras using a 2 factorial design: in/out of wildfire; on/off seismic lines. Half the cameras
were deployed the first field year and the remaining the second field year. We are estimating the
densities of boreal woodland caribou (Rangifertarandus caribou) and moose (Alcesalces) using
hierarchical Bayesian spatial models. Preliminary results suggest inter-annual variability and spatial
segregation of ungulates within the study area. We estimated caribou density using spatial mark-resight
models across three temporal periods and found estimates were similar, with slightly higher densities
during the winter and lower densities during the pre-calving periods. We used spatial count models to
estimate moose densities during the summer period; our estimates were comparable to provincial
estimates. Camera trap surveys can be an effective tool to monitor remote populations, producing
density estimates similar to other survey methods, with the added benefits of capturing inter-annual
variability in density, space-use, and surveying the broader boreal mammal community.
Button T.1
1Ecosystem Information Specialist, BC Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy, and
Provincial Cumulative Effects Framework Moose Value Team Lead, Victoria BC, [email protected]
13
Interim Assessment Protocol for Moose – Assessing and Managing Cumulative Effects in British
Columbia.
Moose are one of five high-value resources identified for provincial assessment under British Columbia’s
(B.C.) Cumulative Effects Framework (CEF). Moose are a high priority species for the Province, which
has legal authority for its conservation and management. The importance of this species is reflected in
the objectives established for moose through legislation, regulation, and policy. Moose are a
conspicuous and iconic part of British Columbia’s fauna that have environmental, economic, social and
cultural importance. Moose are a wide-ranging species that depend upon multiple, well-connected and
functioning habitat with properly functioning ecosystem processes. As such, moose are susceptible to
cumulative impacts on their habitat and their populations from extensive land use activities and
disturbances. As a species that can tolerate, and may even benefit from, some human activities on the
landscape, moose-human interactions are common and complex. The purpose of the interim protocol is
to provide a standardized, transparent and repeatable method for evaluating cumulative effects on
moose across the province of B.C. The protocol consists of two assessment components: 1) habitat, and
2) population. Results from the assessment provide a systematic and comprehensive approach to
describing, rating, and estimating risk that will assist in guiding and informing strategic responses to
moose management in B.C. It is expected that results from a regional review and validation process will
potentially clarify, standardize and improve the interim protocol.
Carson S.1
11079 Raymer Ave, Kelowna [email protected]
A Career as a Wildlife Biologist or Zoologist- Why me?
As a teenager about to graduate high school and make my plunge into adulthood, I am beginning to
experience the common thread of questions about what I plan to do after high school. Up until this year,
I tended to question what career path I wanted to take based on my personal goals and what I believe I
can accomplish. It was not until I became involved in higher level science classes, like biology, that I
found a fascination with the surroundings that our Earth provides for us, especially the animals
contained in them. I recognized my affection towards animals and love for the outdoors to discover a
career path as a Wildlife Biologist or Zoologist. In my opinion, the advantages of working in such a field
are numerous. However, the one that stands out the most for me is the feeling of making a difference in
the fight for the protection of our world’s most beautiful species and explore the many mysteries each
one holds. That is the main reason I currently strive towards a more conservation-based job in this field.
I look forward to conversations with you all to solidify my choice.
Constantinou A.1
1 University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC,[email protected]
How do variable retention forest harvesting methods affect terrestrial mammals in interior BC?
Forest harvesting is part of the economic backbone of British Columbia, but the widespread use of
clearcutting can be problematic for wildlife. Terrestrial mammal species that depend on forest cover and
14
structural diversity face a homogenized landscape after harvesting. In the face of increasing forest
disturbances and climate change, effects of natural resources harvesting on mammals must be
evaluated. Scientists and managers must collaborate to determine best practices for industry and
conservation of wildlife communities. Partial harvest methods may be the key to mitigating the effects
of clearcut harvesting on biodiversity and to combining ecological and economic goals in managed
landscapes. As part of ongoing MSc research, I will use wildlife camera traps and small mammal live
trapping to determine the effects of a gradient of four different forest harvesting treatments on
terrestrial mammal species: clearcut, 60% canopy retention, 30% canopy retention and seed tree
retention. The study areas also span a latitudinal gradient from the Kootenays to north-central BC,
which allows for analysis of variation in response to harvesting treatments across climates. This research
will impact forest management as it pertains to wildlife habitat across the province.
Eckert L.1, N. Ban, C. Owens, F. Moola, C. Darimont
1Doctoral Student, University of Victoria, Victoria BC,[email protected]
Indigenous Knowledge and Environmental Assessment in Canada – implications for wildlife
Large industrial projects often fragment wildlife habitat and increase human-caused mortality. These
impacts are common in Canada, despite formal Environmental Assessment (EA). EA, a western
environmental decision-making process, affects landscapes and human well-being via ruling on if and
how development proposals proceed. For millennia pre-colonization, and today, Indigenous peoples use
Indigenous Knowledge (IK) to inform environmental decision-making. Via observation and culturally-
transmitted learning, Indigenous peoples use IK to establish landscape-scale management strategies.
Scholarship has examined the interaction and tensions between these EA paradigms, often criticizing the
ability of EA to engage meaningfully with IK. In 2018, the Canadian government proposed Bill C-69 to
amend the 2012 EA Act. Addressing this opportunity, we explore obstacles at the interface of IK and EA
via a literature review and qualitative analyses. Our results identify obstacles to improving relationships
between IK and EA, some of which are surmountable (e.g. failures to engage in best practices, alongside
financial, temporal, and resource limitations, etc.), whereas others are substantial (e.g. knowledge
incompatibilities, histories and presence of colonization, asymmetry in power structures, etc.). Drawing
on this synthesis, we summarize recommendations towards authentic incorporation of IK into EA in
ways that support landscapes for wildlife alongside Indigenous rights and self-determination.
Field K.A.1, P. C. Paquet, K.Artelle, G. Proulx, R. K. Brook, C. T. Darimont
1MSc Student, University of Victoria, Victoria BC, andRaincoast Conservation Fellow, Sydney BC,
Publication reform to safeguard wildlife from researcher harm.
Despite abundant focus on responsible care of laboratory animals, we present an evidence-based
argument that inattention to the maltreatment of wildlife constitutes an ethical blind spot in
contemporary animal research. We begin by reviewing significant shortcomings in legal and institutional
oversight, arguing for the relatively rapid and transformational potential of editorial oversight at
journals in preventing harm to vertebrates studied in the field and outside the direct supervision of
institutions. Our analysis of 206 journals suggests that Animal Care (AC) policies are either absent (34%),
weak, incoherent, or neglected by researchers. Presence of AC guidelines was positively associated with
impact factor and animal welfare legislation in the country of origin, and negatively associated with
15
open access status. Straightforward changes to animal care policies in journals could provide a practical,
effective, and rapidly imposed safeguard against unnecessary suffering. The ARROW (Animal Research:
Reporting on Wildlife) guidelines we propose here, coupled with strong enforcement, could result in
significant changes to how animals involved in wildlife research are treated. The research process would
also benefit. Sound science requires animal subjects to be physically, physiologically, and behaviorally
unharmed. Accordingly, publication of methods that contravenes animal welfare principles risks
perpetuating inhumane approaches and bad science.
Ford A.T.1, A. H. Ali, S. R. Colla, S. J. Cooke, C. T. Lamb, J. Pittman, D.Shiffman, and N. J Singh
1Assistant Professor, UBC-Okanagan, Kelowna BC,[email protected]
Averting harmful outcomes in conservation.
Conservation relies on cooperation among different interest groups and the effective and appropriate
use of evidence to make decisions that have positive outcomes for both people and biodiversity.
Negative outcomes are likely to occur when these two dimensions are ignored or misunderstood,
leading to direct harm to populations and indirectly to conservation via alienated partnerships, wasted
resources, confused public, and delegitimized evidence. We document case studies where a failed
appreciation for cooperation, evidence, or both have eroded efforts to conserve wildlife populations.
Averting harmful conservation requires greater adherence to processes that elevate the role of evidence
in decision making and that place collective, long-term benefits for biodiversity over the short-term
gains of individuals or groups.
Gillingham M.P1., and M. M. Mumma
1 Professor, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George BC, [email protected]
Determining factors that affect survival of Moose in Central British Columbia
Moose (Alcesalces) and their habitat are valued by many British Columbians and management actions
should be science-based. Over the last decade, some moose populations in interior BC have declined by
50–70% while others are stable or increasing. Declines coincided with mountain pine beetle
(Dendroctonusponderosae) outbreaks and related salvage harvesting and road building — landscape
changes that could influence the distribution and abundance of moose, predators and hunters. In 2013,
FLNRO initiated a 5-year, provincially coordinated program during which 446 cow moose were collared
across 6 study areas involving many partners. Mortalities (121) resulted from predation (wolf [42%],
bear [7%], cougar [4%], unknown [3%]), apparent starvation (14%), human harvest (13%), health-related
(6%), accidents (4%) and unknown causes (7%). We used selection of collared moose to identify
meaningful thresholds for moose response to time since burn and time since clearcutting. We are using
a survival modelling approach employing landscape, forest structure, and anthropogenic features to
identify key factors that affect moose survival. We are also contrasting habitat selection between cow
moose that lived and died during the study. When combined these analyses are identifying key
management levers for moose in central BC.
Harrower W.L.1,2 and T. S. Jung3,4
1 Research Associate, High-Country Wildlife Ltd. Brentwood Bay BC and University of British Columbia,
Vancouver BC,[email protected]
16
Using expert knowledge to identify conservation outcomes and management options for wolverine
(Gulogulo)
In 2017 wolverine (Gulogulo) were listed in the federal Species at Risk Act as a species of Special Concern
across Canada. As such, a management plan that addresses threats to wolverine must be developed
within three years of legal listing. However, limited information exists to guide conservation or mitigate
human activities that affect wolverine. To address this knowledge gap we surveyed wolverine biologists,
managers and local users for their perspectives on wolverine population status, threats, and
recommended management actions. Participating scientists and resource managers believe climate
change is the greatest threat to local wolverine followed closely by habitat loss and disturbance from
recreationist. Changes in the duration and depth of the snowpack was identified as the single greatest
threat to wolverines and the alteration of harvest quotas and use of harvest reserves as the most effect
management tools. In contrast, local respondents, mostly trappers and indigenous people from the
Yukon see wolverine populations as stable and trappers as good stewards of the resource. Threats
identified by local people focus more on prey populations and habitat loss and were averse to changing
access to public lands or trapping regulations. Threats to wolverine populations are perceived as limited
to development and local in scope. Our surveys highlight a key difference in perceptions of threats and
solutions to wolverine management. Both groups list climate change as a key threat but differ in the
mechanism by which climate change will impact wolverine. Understanding the role of abiotic (snowpack
and temperature) and biotic (predators and prey) factors is key to determining what habitat
requirements and conservation actions will be most appropriate.
Henson L.1, N.Balkenhol, R.Gustas, M. Adams, A. Vik Stronen, B.VonHoldt, B. Koop, C. Darimont
Anthropogenic and landscape drivers of population genetic structure in grizzly bears on the central
coast of BC
Large-scale patterns of genetic variation can enable investigation into how well landscapes – in the deep
and recent past – have facilitated animal movement and mating. Among the potential drivers of
population genetic structure, historical human activities are rarely considered. Additionally, the
movements of large, wide-ranging carnivores are often thought to be influenced by only the most
disruptive of landscape features. In collaboration with five First Nations, we genotyped 22 microsatellite
loci from noninvasively collected hair samples of grizzly bears over a 23,500km2 area of the central coast
of British Columbia. We used the population genetics software STRUCTURE to characterize patterns of
genetic differentiation. Surprisingly, we identified three well-differentiated groups. To gain insight into
the role of potential drivers, we created resistance surfaces using Circuitscape, which incorporated past
and present human use and settlement patterns, in addition to disturbance and landscape barriers. We
assessed the explanatory power of these surfaces using Commonality Analysis. Water barriers and the
spatial demarcation of human language families contributed most to explained variation. The
identification of differentiated subpopulations and the factors that mediate this differentiation not only
provides insight into past and present ecological conditions but also management of populations into
the future.
17
Jessen T.1,2 N. Ban3 , C. Darimont
1University of Victoria, Victoria, BC & Raincoast Conservation Foundation Sydney BC,
Contributions of Indigenous Knowledge to Wildlife Ecology and Evolution: synthesis, prospects, and
guidance
Incorporating diverse knowledge systems leads to richer understanding of wildlife ecology and
evolution, providing scholarly and applied value. Here we synthesize the growing body of work on the
contributions of Indigenous Knowledge (IK). IK is place-based knowledge accumulated
intergenerationally within a cultural context, often augmented with contemporary observations and
experiences. This potent source of information can provide insight into population trends, habitat use,
species interactions, population genetic structure, and more. Such insight emerges from long periods of
direct observation and interactions with wildlife (spanning generations) that offer new hypotheses and
unique information transmitted through oral history, spatially-explicit experiences, field work, and
interviews. We review the primary methods used to engage IK, highlighting complementarities and
differences with science. Despite the value of IK to wildlife science, researchers often lack training and
experience to engage with IK in a culturally-sensitive manner. Cultural sensitivity is warranted because
of past and present harms scientists impose(d) on Indigenous peoples and the potential for IK to be
subsumed inappropriately into western scientific- and management paradigms. Attending to these
promises and pitfalls, we offer illustrative examples from the literature, emergent properties from our
synthesis, and guiding principles to support respectful interaction between IK Holders and wildlife
scientists.
Keery L., M.Hebblewhite, K. Heuer, E. Merrill
1MSc Student, Royal Roads University, Victoria BC, [email protected]
Evaluating the impact of reintroduced bison in Banff National Park
Plains bison have been absent from Banff National Park (BNP) since its establishment. Reintroducing
bison to BNP is an important step to restore the full diversity of species and natural processes in the
Park’s ecosystem. The reintroduction of a dominant ungulate is expected to have a significant impact on
the ecosystem through grazing and physical disturbance. My research assessed what impact
reintroduced bison had in the 18 ha soft-release pasture system. I examined a) bison diet in relation to
forage availability b) forage selection patterns and c) how bison select for and use different landcover
types. I also monitored the impact bison had on vegetation using a before-after control impact (BACI)
experimental design. Data were collected in 2016 and 2017, before and after the bison were
reintroduced. When bison grazed naturally, grasses consisted of 87% of their diet with forbs
representing a minor component of their diet (0.4%). Consistent browsing on shrubs was observed
throughout the year, comprising 12% of bison diet. Browsing consisted primarily of Salix spp (7%) with
minimal browsing observed on other shrub species. The results of this study will help Parks Canada
managers develop monitoring programs and anticipate bison grazing impacts when the bison are free
roaming.
18
Kroc E.1, L. K. Blight, W. Cao
1Research Associate, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, [email protected]
The Urban Bird: Promoting and Protecting Urban Nesters, Migrants, and Residents
Violet-green Swallows migrate from Central America to breed in the wood siding of city structures.
White-crowned Sparrows winter in BC and come to nest in the bushes beside our bus stops. Great Blue
Herons and Bald Eagles nest in our city parks, Pelagic and Double-crested Cormorants nest beneath our
bridges, and Glaucous-winged Gulls live year-round and nest atop our rooftops. Whether they occur in
native habitat or the city, birds and their nests are protected by law. Each of these examples (and
others) speak to the need to develop ecologically responsible building codes, construction schedules,
and city bylaws. There is also a need to educate both the general public and local governments about
how our avian neighbours use our cities. We use recent and ongoing research in Vancouver and Victoria,
to explore the urban life of these species and make recommendations about what can be done to
protect and promote their urban populations while minimizing human-wildlife conflict. As some of these
species face the loss of their traditional habitats (notably, many waterbirds of coastal southwest BC), the
need to study and protect their habitats in the urban environment is an urgent one.
Lamb C.T.,A. T. Ford, M. F. Proctor, J. A. Royle, G. Mowat, and S. Boutin
1 Doctoral Candidate, University of Alberta, Edmonton, [email protected]
Genetic tagging in the Anthropocene: scaling ecology from alleles to ecosystems.
The Anthropocene is an era of marked human impact on the world. Quantifying these impacts has
become central to understanding the dynamics of coupled human-natural systems, resource-dependent
livelihoods, and biodiversity conservation. Ecologists are facing growing pressure to quantify the size,
distribution, and trajectory of wild populations in a cost-effective and socially-acceptable manner.
Genetic tagging, combined with modern computational and genetic analyses, is an under-utilized tool to
meet this demand, especially for wide-ranging, elusive, sensitive, and low-density species. Genetic
tagging studies are now revealing unprecedented insight into the mechanisms that control the density,
trajectory, connectivity and patterns of human-wildlife conflict for populations over vast spatial scales.
Here we outline the application of, and ecological inferences from, new analytical techniques applied to
genetically-tagged individuals, contrast this approach with conventional methods, and describe how
genetic tagging can be better applied to address outstanding questions in ecology. We provide example
analyses using a long-term genetic tagging dataset of grizzly bears in the Canadian Rockies. The genetic
tagging toolbox is a powerful and overlooked ensemble that ecologists and conservation biologists can
leverage to generate evidence and meet the challenges of the Anthropocene.
Majid S.
1 and A. T. Ford1
1MSc. Student, University of British Columbia Okanagan, [email protected]
The movement ecology of infection risk for California bighorn sheep (Oviscanadensiscalifornia) in the
South Okanagan, British Columbia.
19
Parasites influence animal behavior, population dynamics, and ecosystem processes. Parasite
transmission is tied to the host animal’s movement, which is influenced by changes in the landscape. In
the Okanagan Valley of British Columbia, California bighorn sheep (Oviscanadensiscalifornia)
populations have declined by 60% following an infestation of Psoroptisovis mites in 2011. The mites are
transmitted through individuals and the environment, leading to debilitating skin diseases. Mite
infection is currently contained to a sheep subpopulation in the west side of the valley due to landscape
barriers, but transmission risk to the east subpopulation is a significant concern. We will be conducting
two analyses: habitat connectivity and landscape change scenario simulation. Using GPS tracking data of
75 sheep from 2015 – 2019 (45 west- infected; 30 east-uninfected), we will compare habitat selection
and identify areas of contact risk between infected and uninfected subpopulations. The habitat selection
data will populate an agent-based model simulating the spread of mite infection under different
landscape change scenarios: increased connectivity (i.e., wildlife overpass) and new infection point
sources (i.e., domestic sheep operations). Understanding the link between connectivity and disease
exposure will help wildlife managers design effective mitigation measures, critical for conserving sheep
populations in the future.
Mancuso K. 1, M. Bezener, K. E. Hodges, C. A. Bishop
1 The University of British Columbia Okanagan, [email protected]
Migration and Overwintering Locations for Yellow-breasted Chats Breeding in the South Okanagan
Valley of British Columbia.
Western Yellow-breasted Chats (Icteriavirensauricollis) are a species at risk the northern limit of their
breeding range in the dry interior of the south Okanagan Valley of British Columbia. This small
population is listed as Endangered in Canada due to historic loss and fragmentation of their lowland
riparian nesting habitat. To further understand the movement patterns of this population, we deployed
individual tracking devices on the backs of adult male birds to determine their migration route and
overwintering areas. Results to date show British Columbia chats follow the Pacific flyway enroute to
wintering areas in western Mexico. Our project will compare these results with those from chats
breeding in northern Calififrnia. Additional research in progress on this population (and more southerly
populations) include an examination of stress levels and heavy metal contamination. A better
understanding of the range-wide ecology and potential threats to this Endangered peripheral breeding
population will help guide conservation efforts to ensure long-term population viability.
Martinez-Nunez, F.1, C. Palmer, K. Routledge
1 Hemmera Burnaby, [email protected]
Presence of Little Brown Myotis(Myotislucifugus) Positively Associated with Trees and Negatively
Associated with Artificial Light within Waterfront Sites in Metro Vancouver.
Anthropogenic activities can influence bat presence and distribution. We assessed the influence of
human development and activity levels (artificial light and noise) on little brown myotis
(Myotislucifugus), a bat species listed as Endangered under the Canadian Species at Risk Act. We
surveyed 14 sites adjacent to freshwater (Fraser River) and marine (Burrard Inlet) environments within
Metro Vancouver to examine these factors. We selected sites along a gradient of habitat disturbance
20
and anthropogenic activity levels (e.g., modified vegetation, light, noise). Time-constrained (15 minute)
nocturnal surveys were conducted at each site using an Echo Meter Touch microphone and sound and
light meters over three nights in each of July and September 2016. Little brown myotis was the most
prevalent and widely distributed bat across the study area with detections recorded at 11/14 sites
(79%). Stepwise regression models (GLM) found little brown myotis presence was positively associated
with trees (>20 cm DBH) and negatively associated with ambient light.Little brown myotis was detected
more often within fresh water than marine sites and was detected more frequently during July surveys
(i.e., maternity period) as compared to September(i.e., migration/pre-hibernation period). Noise levels
were not significantly related to the presence of little brown myotis.
Meineke J.K.
1, K. E. Hodges, and F. I. Doyle
1University of British Columbia [email protected]
Effects of biosolids on vole population ecology and the raptor and owl community.
Grasslands around the world are becoming degraded due to human causes. In North America’s interior
Pacific Northwest, more than 90% of semi-arid grasslands are in need of restoration. In British Columbia,
grasslands cover only about 1% of the landmass, yet 20% of species listed as “at risk” of extinction in
British Columbia occupy grasslands. Grassland restoration is therefore important to managing imperiled
species. Biosolids (post-treatment sewage) are being used to restore grasslands in some areas. These
grasslands appear to support high densities of insects and small mammal prey, potentially enhancing
predator populations of owls and raptors. To further this research, I will be studying vole populations at
the OK Ranch, a cattle ranch near Clinton, British Columbia. I will quantify differences in vole
populations on untreated pastures and pastures with biosolids applied. I will also study raptor and owl
populations at the ranch, specifically comparing the diets of different species in a biosolids-influenced
ecosystem. This research will expand our knowledge about how biosolids can be used in ecological
restoration and wildlife conservation. Through this project, I am hoping to discover if biosolids can be
used to help restore wildlife populations on degraded grasslands.
Mihalik I.
1, A. W. Bateman, and C. T. Darimont
Big game hunters pay more to target larger-bodied carnivores: insight from costly signalling theory.
Human hunters often target species that require resource investment disproportionate to associated
nutritional rewards. Costly signalling theory may provide an explanation if human hunters target species
that impose high costs, thereby signalling to potential mates or competitors the underlying physical and
cognitive qualities that permit the hunters to absorb such costly behaviour. If costly signalling is relevant
to contemporary hunters, and if prices for guided hunts reflect desirability, we would expect hunters to
pay more to hunt taxa with higher associated costs (e.g. high failure risk, risk of injury). Accordingly, we
hypothesized that prices would be higher for taxa that are larger-bodied, rarer, carnivorous, or
described as dangerous or difficult to hunt. In a data set on 721 guided hunts for fifteen North American
big-game species, prices listed on the internet increased with body size (from approximately $550
USD/day to $1800 USD/day across the observed range of body mass) in carnivores. We did not find a
signal of rarity or perceived danger or difficulty. If larger-bodied carnivores are generally more desirable
21
to hunters due to perceived benefits of costly signalling, then conservation and management strategies
should consider not only the ecology of the hunted but also the motivations of hunters.
Mowat, G.
1, A. P. Clevenger, A. Kortello, D. Hausleitner, M. Barrueto, L. Smit, C. Lamb, B. Dorsey, and P.
K. Ott.
1Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development, Nelson BC.
The sustainability of wolverine trapping mortality in southern Canada
There is considerable conservation concern for wolverines throughout their range in North America.
Previous researchers used population models and observed estimates of survival and reproduction to
infer that current trapping rates strongly limit population growth, except perhaps in the far north where
kill rates appear lower. Assessing the sustainability of trapping empirically requires both demographic
and abundance data which are expensive to acquire and hence usually only achievable for small
populations which makes generalization risky. We surveyed wolverines over a large area of southern
British Columbia (BC) and Alberta and used spatial capture-recapture models (secr) to estimate density
and then calculated trapping kill rates using provincial fur harvest data. Wolverine density
averaged2/1000 km2 and was positively related to spring snow cover and negatively related to road
density. Observed annual trapping mortality was >8.4%/year. This level of mortality is unlikely to be
sustainable except in rare cased where movement rates are high among sub-populations and sizable un-
trapped refuges exist. Our results suggest current conservation risk to wolverine is high because our
study area was fragmented by both human and natural barriers and few large refuges exist. We
recommend wolverine mortality be reduced by at least 50% throughout southern BC and Alberta to
reduce conservation risk and promote population recovery. Uncertainty in the trapping data created
considerable conservation risk and we suggest BC and Alberta adopt a more certain mortality recording
system for this species.
Naidoo R.1 and C. Burton
1 World Wildlife Fund and University of British Columbia,[email protected]
Recreational impacts on wildlife in the South Chilcotin Mountains, BC
The South Chilcotin Mountains Provincial Park and adjacent areas are notable for their diversity of large
wildlife species, including predators such as grizzly bear, wolverine, and cougar, and large ungulates
such as moose, mule deer, and mountain goat. Industrial activities like logging and mining have long
operated on the landscape, while more recently, recreational activities, particularly mountain biking,
have increased. The relative impacts of industrial versus recreational activities remain largely unknown,
which hinders development of management plans that account for cumulative impacts on wildlife.
Here, we use camera traps (n=61) and statistical analyses to untangle the relative contributions of land-
use/land cover and recreational activities on several large wildlife species in the South Chilcotins.
Cameras operated from May-September 2018, recording use of trails and logging roads by wildlife and
people. We developed spatial data layers that reflected land-use and habitat covariates at and around
camera traps. We used occupancy analyses to show that some species, such as grizzly bears, were more
sensitive to human recreational activities than to land-use type, while others, such as mule deer and
22
black bear, showed the opposite pattern. Our results can help park and resource managers balance the
needs of people and wildlife in this region.
Proctor, M.1, W. Kasworm, G.MacHutchon, G.Sanders, J. Barber, C. Lamb, N. Newhouse, H. Locke, C.
Servheen
Re-establishing functional connectivity in a threatened BC grizzly bear population
1 Trans-border Grizzly Bear Project, PO Box 606 Kalso, BC, V0G 1M0, CANADA, [email protected]
Recovering threatened wildlife populations and reversing population fragmentation are 2 conservation
goals that are pressing but elusive. We have been researching conservation issues and implementing a
comprehensive program to recover several small isolated and threatened populations of grizzly bears
for over a decade in the trans-border region of southern Canada and NW USA. We found conflict-related
mortality significantly contributed to their threatened status by causing population declines,
fragmentation, and decreased habitat effectiveness. Our conservation program included strategic
private land purchases to reduce human densities in wildlife corridors, efforts to secure bear attractants,
and non-lethal management of conflict bears and more. We radio collar and use non-lethal
management on potential conflict bears and have a ~84% success rate on females. We identified the
most important backcountry foraging habitats for protection with motorized access controls to reduce
conflicts and mortality and provide habitat security to reproductive females. The composite effects of
working across these arenas has resulted in a significant reduction in human-caused mortality and
increased connectivity, habitat effectiveness, and reproduction resulting in an improved conservation
status of several now-recovering threatened populations. Several challenges remain including a plethora
of offspring from females living adjacent to agricultural areas.
Ramsay L.R.1
1 Zoologist, Conservation Data Centre, Victoria BC, [email protected]
Conservation Status Assessments 101 (or Lists, Bloody Lists)
Have you ever wondered how something gets labelled Red, Blue, Imperilled, Endangered, S3, Yellow,
Secure or any other of the many descriptors for the status of wildlife and ecosystems in British
Columbia? Wonder no more. I will go through the criteria and method that has been adopted by the B.C.
Conservation Data Centre to assess species and ecosystems in B.C.. This method was developed through
NatureServe and is used across North and Latin America. We have been using versions in B.C. since 1991
and the latest iteration since 2012. It is also used to complete the General Status assessments across
Canada. There are methodological and criteria overlaps with IUCN and COSEWIC, the other big
assessment names that will be touched on. A complete assessment relies on data from many sources
that is as current as possible. Having the connections open and identified with people working on the
ground in many capacities is important.
Riordan-Short E.1
23
1University of British Columbia– Okanagan, Kelowna BC, [email protected]
Wildlife Photography, Citizen-Science, and You.
Recent technological innovations, particularly widespread access to high-resolution cameras and online
species databases like eBird and iNaturalist, have facilitated the generation of massive open data
collections. The increasing popularity of these platforms among recreational users gives them potential
to be an effective tool for wildlife education, outreach, and data collection. The scientific value of
citizen-generated data has been a divisive topic of discussion, but ongoing developments in data
validation and management continue to advance citizen-science as an inclusive and innovative approach
to wildlife data and community-driven questions. This approach necessitates a discussion on collection
methods, data quality, and wildlife ethics.
St. Clair C.T.
1, J. Hobbs, J. Randall
1 Hemmera,Burnaby, [email protected]
Challenges and Insights in Assessing Long-term Population Trends of Coastal Western Screech-owl
(Megascopskennicottiikennicottii).
Monitoring population trends is challenging and requires cooperation among stake-holders, particularly
for rare and difficult to detect species. The coastal subspecies of western screech owl
(Megascopskennicottii[WSOW]) appeared to be declining in British Columbia; however, lacking a long-
term monitoring plan, this was difficult to confirm. We compiled existing records for WSOW from
government, industry, and independently funded efforts and used occupancy modeling to assess
historical population trends and provide recommendations for long-term monitoring. Results suggest
that WSOW populations had declined substantially since 2000, particularly between 2005 and 2008.
Estimates of current occupancy and detection probability within suitable habitat were low (10-20% and
30-40%, respectively). Consequently, we determined that the effort necessary to detect long-term
trends was not likely feasible. Alternative objectives for future monitoring were recommended: modest
survey efforts where historical data is available for comparison; surveys in habitats with the potential to
support healthier WSOW populations (e.g., Hypermaritime, low productivity, mature forests). Follow-up
surveys within such habitat in northern and western Vancouver Island found much higher occupancy
rates (36-92%: MFLNRO, B. Schroeder, G. Monty). These results provide preliminary indications that, in
some areas, healthier populations of WSOW may persist and provide new opportunities for long-term
monitoring within BC.
Sunter, E.J.1 and A.T. Ford
1University of British ColumbiaOkanagan Kelowna BC, [email protected]
New directions in human-carnivore coexistence research
In landscapes where carnivore persistence is a management objective, coexistence may mean that
human-carnivore interactions are not always preventable. Past research has largely focused on conflict
interactions, leaving a significant knowledge gap in our understanding of coexistence beyond conflict. I
will discuss this knowledge gap and explain how analysing the distribution of incidents (i.e., conflict;
physical attacks, property damage, carnivore consumption of human food) and sightings (i.e., animal,
24
property, and person remain unharmed) together can provide novel insights into coexistence. I will use
research on humanbear interactions from Alberta’s Bow Valley as a case study to support this concept. I
will also address the collaborative opportunities between agencies responsible for collecting
humancarnivore interaction records, where current policies support this concept, and where we can
improve data collection to shape stronger policies that will better prevent incidents from occurring.
Symes S.1 and K.W. Larsen
1Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Thompson Rivers [email protected]
Using winter space use of the North American badger (Taxideataxusjeffersonii) to guide spatial and
temporal avoidance measures.
Wildlife managers and biologists often must make important conservation decisions in the face of
limited data. For example, spatial and temporal avoidance measures (e.g. buffers or setbacks) are used
to protect important or at-risk wildlife features (e.g. residences) from development impacts. Although
these should be based upon sound science, guidance for their establishment often appear to be
arbitrary or at least without robust justification. In the case of the North American badger
(Taxideataxusjeffersonii), a federally-listed endangered species, guidance for spatial avoidance of
burrows is not readily available and varies between jurisdictions. Moreover, setbacks do not appear to
be based on empirical evidence. In winter, badgers reduce movements and increase residence time
within key burrows where they undergo bouts of torpor. Disturbance during this season may be more
critical to avoid than during summer when badgers are more active and burrow use is more transitory.
We highlight past research on 1) differentiating winter and summer burrows and 2) winter movements
of this species. These data can be used as a starting point to guide setback establishment from
important winter burrows.
Tattersall E.1, J.Burgar, J.Fisher, and C. Burton
1 MSc Student, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC,[email protected]
Seismic consequences: Large mammal community dynamics on a boreal working landscape.
Amidst ongoing human landscape change, a critical question for ecologists is how the effects of
disturbances propagate throughout ecological hierarchies. Using camera traps deployed in northern
Alberta – a boreal working landscape transformed by industrial development – we investigated how
large boreal mammals respond to human landscape change at both the population and the community
level. First, we examined seismic line use by caribou, caribou predators, and caribou competitors in
response to seismic line restoration. We found that white-tailed deer decrease line use with restoration,
wolves increase use of lines accessible to humans, and that caribou prefer seismic lines in lowland
habitat regardless of line type. Next, we explored whether interspecific interactions affected
occurrences of black bears, coyotes, and lynx on the working landscape. All three species showed
positive associations with wolves on at least one spatiotemporal level of analysis, suggesting facilitative
interactions between apex and non-apex predators. These results show how human landscape change
influences species’ use of the working landscape, and how those responses can trigger subsequent
25
responses at the community level. Ultimately, this research highlights important considerations for
mitigating effects of landscape change on wildlife at the community level.
Uduman A.1, Cole Burton, Shannon Hagerman, Andrew Kittle
1MSc Student, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC,[email protected]
Investigating ecological and social dimensions of leopard-livestock conflict in Sri Lanka.
How do we balance economic development and poverty alleviation while allowing for coexistence with
species competing with humans for habitat and potential prey? Human-wildlife conflict, particularly
livestock depredation, occurs globally; here in B.C. and also 13,000km away in Sri Lanka, where conflict
between cattle herders and the endangered Sri Lankan leopard is escalating. Understanding the complex
interactions between large carnivores and livestock farming communities means addressing both the
social and ecological dimensions. I will present the in-progress modeling results of ecological predictor
variables and their relative influence on resulting conflict, and thus the conditions under which conflict is
more likely to occur. Social surveys which measured attitudes towards a) leopards, and b) willingness to
adopt mitigating techniques will be modelled against predictor variables (e.g. socio-demographics, costs,
knowledge, experience) in subsequent analyses. Local contexts vary greatly, and though Sri Lanka is
geographically distant from B.C., the interdisciplinary approaches taken to address this multi-faceted
issue to inform the prioritization of limited conservation resources is relevant beyond the island nation’s
borders. Building connections, a theme of this conference, is also a necessary theme of human-wildlife
conflict research, which requires greater knowledge sharing and collaboration between local
communities, governments, academics and private sectors.
vanBommel J.V.1 and C. Burton1
1 UBC Vancouver Faculty of Forestry, Department of Forest Resources Management, Forest Sciences
Centre 2215, 2424 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4,
Assessing predictors of human-carnivore conflict on Southern Vancouver Island
A major threat to carnivores is death due to human conflict. Specifically, conflict regarding human safety
or livelihoods, such as over agricultural crops or livestock, garbage, or property damage, leading to
reactive mitigation. This is an increasing issue for Southern Vancouver Island due to rapidly sprawling
human development and high concentrations of cougars (Puma concolor), black bears
(Ursusamericanus) and grey wolves (Canis lupus). To reduce human-carnivore conflicts and promote
coexistence with carnivores, it is critical to have reliable evidence documenting where conflict is
occurring to target proactive mitigations efficiently. I will be showcasing the preliminary results of my
project which tackles this objective at two spatial scales: the entire Capital Regional District (CRD)
around Victoria where I am developing spatial models to map CRD residents’ reports of interactions with
carnivores and test anthropogenic and environmental predictors of conflict. And the municipality with
the highest occurrence of conflict, Sooke, where I have deployed a camera trap array to discover where
black bears are spending their time in a gradient of human development from urban to wild. This
research will determine where carnivores are selecting human environments and the relationship
between habitat use and the level of conflict an area experiences.
Weir R
1., W.L. Harrower2, K.L. Pilgrim3, M. K. Schwartz3
26
1 Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy: Ecosystems Branch. BC. [email protected]
Identifying functional populations of fishers and wolverines for conservation and management.
Fishers (Pekaniapennanti) and wolverines (Gulogulo) are wide-ranging, valuable furbearers of
conservation concern in British Columbia, Canada that occur at low densities that preclude management
of populations by individual trappers. Information on the structure and extent of populations is needed
to ensure that harvests are biologically sustainable. We used information from mitochondrial and
nuclear DNA of 553 fishers and 241 wolverines collected from throughout British Columbia from 1995 to
2017 to examine genetic structure and diversity for each species. We used assignment tests to evaluate
the extent of population structure, identify population clusters and delineate functional populations. We
identified considerable population structure in both fishers and wolverines in British Columbia.
Microsatellite data suggests up to 9 populations of fisher in the province. Wolverines showed less
structure especially in northern British Columbia, but cluster analysis still suggested up to 4 functional
populations occurring in the province. This new information will help trappers better understand the
scope and scale of the populations of fishers and wolverines from which they harvest, and provide data
needed by management agencies to identify population units, evaluate the spatial distribution of
threats, and better assess the viability of each species in the province.
Werner J.R.1 and K. Parker
1Ministry of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations, Prince George
Where should a hungry moose eat? Habitat-specific protein limitation in managed landscapes.
Many mature forests in north-central BC are being rapidly converted to early seral plantation.
Concomitant declines in some regional moose densities, coupled with observations of apparent
starvation from collared females, suggest that bottom-up factors influence populations even in systems
with predators. We quantified the nutritional value of moose food plants in relation to solar
environments associated with mature understory forest and recently logged clearings. Concentrations of
digestible protein in Willow (Salix bebbiana), Red Osier dogwood (Cornusstolonifera), Fireweed
(Epilobiumangustifolium), Subalpine Fir (Abieslasiocarpa), and Birch (Betulapapyrifera) generally
declined in large openings compared to cut-block edges and forest understories. Habitat-specific
allocation of anti-herbivory defenses in plants (tannins and secondary compounds) depending on solar
radiation loads may render the available protein in some plant species below the maintenance
requirements for moose.
Wright C.1, S. Gilbert, C. McLean, C. Procter, A.Walker, J. Zeman, A.Ford
1University of British Columbia – Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, [email protected]
Linking behavior, demography, and environmental change in mule deer populations in southern
British Columbia.
27
Mule deer (Odocoileushemionus; hereafter deer) populations in southern British Columbia (BC) are
suspected to be declining, with hunter harvest in the Boundary region having decreased by 85% in the
last 25 years. The causes of this decline are not clear due to multiple, simultaneous changes in the
landscape including increasing predator densities, human development, and competition with other
ungulates. Furthermore, after decades of fire suppression over 2.5 million ha burned in BC in the last
two years. Fires can create nutritionally-rich forage for deer and thin vegetation, which can increase
deer survival. To help disentangle which mechanisms are driving deer populations in southern BC, we
began a large-scale, collaborative research project in March 2018 with a goal of deploying 270 global
positioning system (GPS) collars on deer in 3 study areas (Bonaparte Plateau, West Okanagan, and
Boundary regions). Here we provide some preliminary findings from the past year. We have deployed 87
collars on adult females and 32 collars on fawns, with 10 mortality events thus far. We found 92% of
yearling and adult females were pregnant, with at least 63% carrying twins. Of the 64 deer collared
during spring and fall we observed 50 deer make migratory movements.
Yaeger J.S.1, R. D. Weir ,P.L.Almuedo, F.Corbould, L.Davis, I. Hansen, E.C. Lofroth , M. Phinney , and K.
Sutherland
1British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural
Development: Species at Risk Recovery Branch, Victoria BC, [email protected]
Who is using YOUR science? Targeting decision-makers to conserve fisher habitat across
British Columbia.
Forest management has the single largest anthropogenic effect on the sustainability of fisher
populations in British Columbia (BC), Canada. Many opportunities exist during all phases of
forest management to incorporate decisions that may reduce the negative effects of this activity
on the supply of habitat for fishers. Initiated in 2009, the BC Fisher Habitat Extension Program
provides tools and training developed to specifically address decisions made by various “Habitat
Influencers” who affect the supply of fisher habitat. Program biologists converted the best
available science from 25 years of research into user-specific products with a goal of achieving
better-informed management decisions. We have provided training to forest licensees and
contractors across more than 60% of the range of fishers in BC, targeting the 10 Natural
Resource Districts that account for a majority of provincial timber production. Three of these
districts now require relevant decision-makers to show evidence of how they intend to achieve
fisher habitat targets as identified in the BC Fisher and Forestry Web Module
(www.bcfisherhabitat.ca).
Zeman J.1
1British Columbia Wildlife Federation, Surrey BC, [email protected]>
Managing to Zero: The Future of Fish and Wildlife in BC
Funding shortfalls for fish and wildlife management agencies across North America is a recurring and
growing issue; British Columbia is no exception. Wildlife management activities supported by the
provincial government compete with ever increasing costs for available resources. While most
28
jurisdictions have dedicated funding for fish and wildlife management in British Columbia does not.
Given its size and diversity British Columbia has one of the most under-funded fish and wildlife
management agencies in North America. We will discuss the fundamentals of fish and wildlife
management, as well as potential solutions for improving conservation outcomes and fish and wildlife
management
29
Poster Presentations
Kanya, J.1 and S. Warriner
1 City of Coquitlam: Environmental Services Division, Coquitlam BC. [email protected]
Education & Bylaw Enforcement to Reduce Human-Bear Conflict – Review of the City of Coquitlam’s
Urban Wildlife Program
Since establishing a seasonal Bear Aware Program in 2005, the City of Coquitlam has initiated wide-ranging measures to reduce human-bear conflict. The program has since evolved to be year-round and targets the full range of wildlife found within the community. The urban wildlife program traditionally focused on education to reduce human wildlife conflict rather than strict bylaw enforcement. However human-wildlife conflicts continued despite consistent education provided to the public. In response to growing levels of concern by the community, and following a high profile human-bear incident in 2016, the City significantly increased the frequency of patrols to enforce restrictions related to unsecured garbage and other attractants. Additionally innovative educational tools and extensive use of social media have been developed to ensure residents are aware of and supported in their efforts to secure attractants. The City has also undertaken extensive city-wide compliance audits in 2017, 2018 and 2019, which have allowed staff to focus on neighbourhoods of concern and monitor overall adherence to bear smart bylaws. The City now has an extensive dataset that clearly shows the City’s balance of outreach/education and bylaw enforcement have resulted in a significant and positive shift in residents’ behaviour with regards to managing wildlife attractants.
Kroc E.1
1 Research Associate, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, [email protected]
It’s Time to Advocate for Federal Protections for Cormorants
Cormorants have a unique and unfortunate history with humans in North America. Since the advent of
European colonization, cormorants have often been uniquely persecuted among piscivorous species due
to the combination of their feeding and nesting habits, and their high visibility. Double-crested
Cormorants were hunted and poisoned (intentionally or incidentally) to drastically low population
numbers in the first half of the 20th Century, while Great, Pelagic, and Brandt’s Cormorants have had to
endure the consequences of habitat destruction, overfishing, and exploding marine traffic in our ocean
waters. After a short window of population rebounds in the 1980’s and 90’s, these birds are once again
in decline across Canada, and many face new threats in the form of government proposals - most
recently in Ontario - to institute hunting seasons with potentially catastrophic parameters. These birds
remain unprotected by federal law, making them especially vulnerable. Opportunities exist to
strengthen conservation efforts for these birds, particularly among those populations that live and nest
in urban environments, but the time to act is growing short. It’s time to push for better local and
broader federal protections for these beautiful and ecologically valuable species.
30
Kroesen L. D Hik, and S. Cherry
Simon Fraser University, Burnaby BC, [email protected]
Goat Gatorade: How do Mineral Licks Define Mountain Goat Home Range?
All North American ungulate species deliberately ingest soil from mineral licks to obtain nutrients they
cannot acquire from regular forage. Mineral licks have a critical impact on fecundity, population
dynamics and survival of ungulates, yet, little is known about how mineral resources define home range
and affect movements patterns of individuals within a population. I will evaluate mineral licks as critical
‘resource hotspots’ for mountain goats (Oreamnosamericanus), an alpine ungulate that displays
extreme travel behaviour and high site fidelity to a limited number of licks. My research aims to answer
these questions: Do mineral licks constrain or extend mountain goat home range? What specific
minerals do mountain goats seek out at these licks and do their preferences change seasonally? My
research will capitalize on the high fidelity of mountain goats to licks by using individual based tracking
to measure mountain goat movements within their core home range. All research will be conducted in
collaboration with Parks Canada in Banff and Yoho National Parks, in the Rocky Mountains. Mineral licks
are a special habitat feature that is critical to maintaining the health of ungulate populations.
Incorporating mineral licks into landscape-level management planning is necessary, but first, it is
essential to know how and why ungulate species use them.
Lamont M.1, D. Hancock, D. Bird, J. Elliott, S. Lee, M.Seear, and R.Ydenberg
1The Hancock Wildlife Foundation, Surrey, BC, Canada and TerraFauna Wildlife Consulting, Inc.
Spring migration and movements of bald eagles (haliaeetusleucocephalus) wintering in south coastal
British Columbia.
A 36-year bounty program on Bald Eagles (Haliaeetusleucocephalus) existed in Alaska until 1953,
resulting in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of birds. Since its cessation, there has been a
remarkable recovery in the number of Bald Eagles throughout the Pacific Northwest. The Fraser Valley in
British Columbia now harbours a large population of resident and non-resident Bald Eagles with
estimates of up to 35,000 birds passing through the region during spring and fall movements.
Additionally, concentrations as large as 10,000 birds congregate during peak salmon spawning periods
on the Lower Fraser River, representing the largest known gatherings for the species anywhere in North
America. There is limited information about the origins of this wintering population, how long they
remain in the area and to what degree, and how the broader western metapopulation, utilizes the
Fraser River for winter foraging opportunities. To date, limited telemetry data has been collected from
this region of the Pacific Northwest, particularly on wintering birds. We describe spring migration
chronology of adult and sub-adult Bald Eagles trapped and banded between February and March 2018
in Delta, B.C. as well as techniques used in the capture and deployment of GPS-GSM transmitters to
address some of these knowledge gaps. Preliminary results of spring movements including unexpected
31
southern migrations prior to northern departure, near simultaneous northward migration from the
Fraser Valley and arrival on northern breeding grounds in Alaska, are discussed.
Lausen, C.L.1, J. Rae, C. Olson and J. Ray
Bat Conservation: Preparing British Columbia for the arrival of white-nose syndrome.
1 Wildlife Conservation Society Canada, PO Box 606, Kaslo, B.C. V0G 1M0, CANADA [email protected]
Wildlife Conservation Society Canada’s bat program takes a comprehensive and collaborative approach
to conservation in western Canada, with focus on preparing for the arrival of white-nose syndrome
(WNS): 1) Winter research and hibernation ecology; 2) North American Bat Monitoring Program
(NABat); 3) education, outreach and citizen science; and 4) mitigation tools, including the
implementation of a prophylaxis, and investigating the efficacy of bat houses. Our research over the
past decade in B.C. and Alberta has enhanced understanding of winter ecology and physiology, enabling
predictions of WNS vulnerability. In B.C, through multiple partnerships, we monitor ~50 NABat grid cells.
Our highly effective Alberta Community Bat (albertabats.ca) and BatCaver (BatCaver.org) programs have
identified and described roosts/hibernacula, setting the stage for WNS mitigation efforts. In a parallel
project we are working with partners to develop a WNS prophylaxis that could be applied in late
summer at bat boxes. However, it is unclear whether bat boxes are suitable for recovery/mitigation
efforts; our newest project is a critical evaluation of these structures, in light of recent published and
anecdotal records suggesting detrimental effects such as overheating. Our field efforts and contributions
from others will inform a Best Management Practices for their implementation across North America.
32
Attachment 1: Conservation Affairs Committee Session: Establishing our Future Conservation Priorities Together
The BCTWS Conservation Affairs Committee identified three priority issues to help guide our work in BC over the coming year:
1. Assist wildlife professionals in engaging and working with Indigenous Peoples in wildlife conservation and management
a. More specifically, what is TWS’s position on First Nations rights over wildlife? b. Does TWS adopt the principles of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights
on Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), as the British Columbian and Canadian governments have?
c. How can TWS be more inclusive of knowledge and values of Indigenous Peoples in wildlife management? What tools could they provide wildlife professionals in doing so?
d. For BCTWS more specifically, how can we be more inclusive of Indigenous Peoples in our organization, including the Conservation Affairs Committee?
2. Highlight the importance of climate change in wildlife conservation and management
a. Wildlife professionals need support and encouragement for including climate change in wildlife research and management
b. Climate change is often ignored in wildlife management, but the impacts of climate change on wildlife are likely to be highly significant; TWS can play a lead role in ensuring this message is delivered and by empowering wildlife professionals in incorporating climate change in their work
3. Provide guidance for assessing human-wildlife conflict across large-scales a. There is a lack of coordinated understanding of how human-wildlife conflict tools
can minimize conflicts b. Municipalities may or may not have bylaws, but they have not been
systematically documented and their effectiveness has not been tested c. There is a need to promote a ‘big picture’ look at this issue
The BCTWS Conservation Affairs Committee is interested in your thoughts and opinions on these issues. We are also always looking for new wildlife management and conservation issues that we can help promote or resolve.
Please consider the issues identified above, and others, that you would like to discuss at the Conservation Affairs Committee session of the inaugural BCTWS conference. This will be an opportunity to share ideas and shape the direction of the Conservation Affairs Committee in the coming year.