The Whiskey Rebellion. George Washington No Party; 1789-1794.
-
Upload
william-robertson -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
1
Transcript of The Whiskey Rebellion. George Washington No Party; 1789-1794.
![Page 1: The Whiskey Rebellion. George Washington No Party; 1789-1794.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081907/55157adf55034685568b6458/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Whiskey Rebellion
![Page 2: The Whiskey Rebellion. George Washington No Party; 1789-1794.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081907/55157adf55034685568b6458/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
George WashingtonNo Party; 1789-1794
![Page 3: The Whiskey Rebellion. George Washington No Party; 1789-1794.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081907/55157adf55034685568b6458/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Whiskey Rebellion (1791-1794)
Congress passed tax on whiskey to help pay war debit and raise money for treasury; When tax collectors attempted to collect taxes, farmers in Pennsylvania rebelled.
![Page 4: The Whiskey Rebellion. George Washington No Party; 1789-1794.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081907/55157adf55034685568b6458/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Opposing Side 1: Farmers/Common People
Felt tax was unfair burden on farmers. They grew corn and converted it to whiskey. The tax made whiskey more expensive and fewer people were buying it.
![Page 5: The Whiskey Rebellion. George Washington No Party; 1789-1794.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081907/55157adf55034685568b6458/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Opposing Side 2: Federal Government
Felt they needed the tax to pay off debit; they targeted a “luxury.” shocked at farmers defiance. Government sent militia to make them obey.
![Page 6: The Whiskey Rebellion. George Washington No Party; 1789-1794.](https://reader035.fdocuments.in/reader035/viewer/2022081907/55157adf55034685568b6458/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Results/EffectsGovernment militia easily won (farmers were unorganized); Federal Government showed power, strength. Some say the use of force on the part of the government was excessive.