The Violence of Public Art W.J.T. MITCHELL. Why is “Do the Right Thing” a work about Public Art?...
-
Upload
willis-hawkins -
Category
Documents
-
view
219 -
download
0
Transcript of The Violence of Public Art W.J.T. MITCHELL. Why is “Do the Right Thing” a work about Public Art?...
The Violence of Public Art
W.J.T. MITCHELL
Why is “Do the Right Thing” a work about Public Art?
• Other examples:– Tiananmen Square (1989)– Tilted Arc (1989)– Vietnam Veterans Memorial (1982)
Tiananmen Square1989
“Tilted Arc” (Richard Serra) 1981
Vietnam Veterans Memorial(Maya Lin) 1982
“Do the Right Thing” (Spike Lee) 1989
Public/Private Art … Symbolic/Actual Violence
• Mitchell argues that these distinctions are eroding.
• Historic link between public art, violence and regime change.
Kinds of Violence in Public Art
• The image as an act or object of violence: either doing violence or suffering violence.
• The image as a weapon of violence: attack, coercion, incitement or other “dislocations”.
• The image as a representation of violence
• Can be mixed: Pornography is both a representation and a weapon of violence against women.
His argument for film as public art
• Film can be considered public art because of the blurring of the lines between public and private.– Private Arousal/Public Action in the example
of pornography.
– Differences: Public Art is stable/Film is mobile
– Pacified space vs Commercial private [isolated] space.
– Film uses violence as a climax.
“Do the Right Thing” as a work of public art
• Not only work of “public art”, but a work about public art.– The “public image” is the “Hall of Fame” in
Sal’s Pizzeria.• Sal’s response is “economic”• As is Buggin’ Out’s.
– A highly realistic representation of the public images of blacks. [Representations]
Mookie’s Act
• He breaks the window, which is an– Act of Violence that
• Attacks a public symbol• By breaking the boundary between public and
private property.
– Mitchell argues that the act is about more than Mookie’s rage.• Why is it an “ethical intervention”?
“Do the Right Thing” as a work of violent public art
• It is a– A REPRESENTATION of violence– An ACT of Violence– A WEAPON of Violence.
• Mitchell argues that it is “intelligent violence”, both ethically and aesthetically precise.
• “Daring to dream of a more humane and comprehensive sphere”