The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm Value In U.S.
Transcript of The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm Value In U.S.
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm Value In U.S.
Master thesis
Rui Zhang
ANR: 484834
23 Aug 2012
International Management
Faculty of Economics and Business Administration
Supervisor: Dr. J.C. Rodriguez
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
1
Management Summary
According to the International Financial Report Standards (I.F.R.S.) firms must disclosure their
financial position about the financial derivatives position in their annual report, which makes
it possible to do the empirical research about the derivative usage effect on the firm risk and
firm value. In the last two decades, the financial market becomes more and more mature,
and increasing number of firms choose to use the derivative instrument to hedge the risk, for
instance, the interest rate risk, foreign exchange rate risk and commodity price risk.
Following the study Allayannis and Weston (2001), this paper tests the relationship between
the foreign currency derivative usage and firm value in U.S. A sample of 94 firms of Fortune
200 firms is selected based on their business activities and available information. This sample
is studied during a research period from 2009 to 2011, which contributes to 282
observations.
The information on the foreign currency derivatives of the sample is collected and extracted
manually from their 10-k form annual reports. Followed by the research of Allayannis (2011),
Tobin’s Q which is defined as the ratio of market value of the firm to the total asset is used as
a proxy for firm value. The hedging dummy variable equals to 1 if firm reports the derivative
activity in annual report, otherwise, it equals to 0. In order to control some factors which
may also have influence on firm value, several control variables consisting of size, profitability,
investment growth, access to financial market, industry diversification, geographic
diversification and advertisement expenditure are employed in my empirical analysis.
In the univariate analysis the differences of firm characteristics between hedging and non-
hedging observations are examined. It seems that hedgers have a higher firm value
compared with non-hedgers, but the result is not statistically significant. Concerning the firm
characteristics, firms having the derivatives activities are more likely to be industry
diversified and geographic diversified, and have high advertisement expenditure.
The univariate analysis just gives us a surface understanding about the relationship between
the use of foreign currency derivative and firm value. However, the multivariate analysis can
control the factors which may also impact firm value and isolate the effect of foreign
currency derivative on firm value. In the multivariate analysis, I did the pooled OLS
regression and fixed effect regression to investigate the relationship between hedging and
firm value. The results from the both regressions show that foreign currency derivative usage
does not significantly influence firm value. While, the control variable size has a negative
effect on firm value and the result is statistically significant in both regressions. The
coefficient of investment growth is positive and statistically significant in the fixed effect
regression.
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
2
Preface
This thesis presents and describes the main result of my theoretical and empirical research
about the effect of foreign currency derivative on firm value. Since my major is International
Management instead of Finance, The process of writing this thesis is much more challenging
as I thought before. However, this experience will be very useful in my future career and life.
During these several months, writhing this thesis increased my knowledge about the risk
management, the statistically knowledge and the Stata software.
First of all, I would like to thank Dr. J.C. Rodriguez for his role as supervisor. His advice and
feedback were very helpful and enlightening during my writing process. Furthermore, I
would like to thank Dr. F. Feriozzi for his time and role in the exam committee.
With this master thesis, I successful finish my study of International Management at Tilburg
University. When I look back this one year, although it is tough, I have developed myself both
on academic and personal level. This one year abroad studying experience will be very useful
in my future life and career. I would like to thank my parents who supported me during this
one year. Furthermore, I would like to thank my friends who make my time in Tilburg
unforgettable.
Rui Zhang
23 Aug 2012
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
3
Content
Management Summary ............................................................................................................. 1
Preface ....................................................................................................................................... 2
Chapter 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 4
Chapter 2 Background of hedging ............................................................................................. 7
2.1 The financial distress costs .............................................................................................. 7
2.2 Taxes ................................................................................................................................ 8
2.3 Underinvestment ............................................................................................................. 9
2.4 Management incentives ................................................................................................ 10
Chapter 3 Previous literature review ....................................................................................... 11
Chapter4: research method ................................................................................................. 15
4.1 The sample collection and data collection .................................................................... 15
4.2 Firm value ...................................................................................................................... 17
4.3 Control variable ............................................................................................................. 17
Chapter 5 Empirical research................................................................................................... 21
5.1 Summary statistics of derivative use ............................................................................. 21
5.2 Sample description ........................................................................................................ 22
5.3 Univariate analysis ......................................................................................................... 24
5.4 Multivariate analysis ...................................................................................................... 26
5.5 Alternative control variable ........................................................................................... 31
Chapter 6 Determinants of hedging ........................................................................................ 34
Chapter 7 Discussion of the result ........................................................................................... 37
Chapter 8 Conclusion............................................................................................................... 39
Reference: ................................................................................................................................ 41
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
4
Chapter 1 Introduction
Derivatives are financial weapons of mass destruction.
-----Warren E. Buffett, 2003 Berkshire Hathaway Annual report
The financial crisis of 2008-2009 has brought new scrutiny to the use of financial derivatives.
Recent proposals in major countries, including the United States, call for greater regulations
of over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, including conditions for making positions to market
prices, trade registrations, trade clearing, exchange trading, and higher capital and margin
requirement1.
The use of financial derivative instrument by non-financial firms has grown rapidly in last two
decades, and the markets of derivative financial instruments on interest rates, foreign
exchange rates and commodity prices also have displayed an rapidly development.
Regulations about these financial derivatives have been improved in many countries as well,
which require the companies to disclose the information on the derivative position in the
fiscal annual report. In particular, firms in the United States, United Kingdom, Australia,
Canada, and New Zealand as well as firms fulfilling with International Accounting Standards
(IAS) are required to disclose the information about the financial derivative position2. The
available data makes the empirical research about the financial derivatives by non-financial
firms become possible and effective.
Before the disclosure of financial information in the annual report, the financial derivative as
part of risk management was considered as the important strategy for firms. During that
time, most of the researches about the financial derivative were theoretical. Others
researchers conducted the empirical analysis by collecting the data through the survey. The
big disadvantage of survey or questionnaire is that it is difficult for the researcher to get the
accurate information or data about the firms’ derivatives position, because managers of
some firms do not want to disclose their motivation or determinants of derivative usage or
they do not want to leak the information to their competitors.
In fact, although the data of derivative instrument become more and more available, the
detailed empirical research about the effect of derivatives usage on firms’ risk and value is
unclear and mixed. For instance, Mian(1996) studies a large sample with 2799 non-financial
firms in U.S. after the introduction of information disclosure requirement about the
derivatives position. They find that the derivative usage exhibits the economies of scale, but
1 Bartram 2011
2 Bartram 2011
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
5
the evidence is weak with supporting the convex tax function. Geczy(1997) testes a sample
consisting of 372 Fortune 500 non-financial firms in U.S. The result shows that firms with
tighter financial distress, greater growth options, extensive foreign exchange rate exposure,
and economies of scale in hedging activities are more likely to use the currency derivatives.
Guay(1999) finds that the total risk, idiosyncratic risk exposure to interest risk declined for
firms with derivative usage, but the author finds no significant change in the market risk of
these firms. In contrast, Hentschel and Kothari (2001) find that the difference about risk for
firms which use the derivatives is economically small compared to firms that do not use
them. Allayannis and Weston (2001) present the evidence to support that derivatives activity
contribute to an approximately 4%increases in market value. Graham and Rogers (2002) find
that the hedging activity allows the firms to increase the debt capacity, which is associated
with a1.1% increase to firms’ market value. However, Guay and Kothari (2003) point out that
the magnitude of the cash flow generated by hedging activities is modest and is unlikely to
account for such big difference on firms’ market value. Consistent with result of Guay and
Kothari (2003), Jin and Jorion (2006) also find an insignificant effect of hedging activity on
firm value by employing a sample of oil and gas producers in the U.S.
The reason why I choose to collect the sample from the U.S. is that compared with other
countries, the financial markets in the U.S. is more mature and steady. Another major reason
is the data availability. The improvement of disclosure requirement in U.S. allows the
researchers to obtain the information about firm’s derivatives position and to investigate
whether the use of derivative for hedging purpose is a value creative strategy for firms.
In this paper, I chose to focus on the effect of foreign currency derivative usage on firm value
for the following reasons: (1) I am interested in isolating a common risk factor (the foreign
exchange rate risk) and investigate whether the use of foreign currency derivatives increases
the market value of the firms or not which are exposure to the exchange rate risk. (2) In the
U.S., foreign currency derivatives are the most commonly used derivatives. Geczy (1995)
documents that among the Fortune 200, 52.1% firms use currency derivatives. Bartram
(2003) reports 63.2% of 2841 firms in U.S utilize the foreign currency derivatives. Bartram
(2011) employs the sample of 2076 firms in U.S. and finds that 65.1% of firms have the usage
of foreign currency derivatives. (3) Most companies in the U.S. have the foreign exchange
rate exposure by having foreign sale, foreign asset or foreign liability. (4) The previous
literatures demonstrate that the factors affecting firm’s motivation of using the interest rate,
foreign currency and commodity price derivatives are different, which can also have effect on
firm value.
In my research, I used the data set that includes 94 firms in Fortune 200 firms in the U.S.
from 2009 to 2011. I collected the annual reports of Fortune 200 firms from the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and checked them one by one. Among these 200
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
6
firms, 15 firms did not mention any foreign sale, foreign asset or foreign liability; 41 firms are
financial firms; 4 Firms had big merger or acquisition activities in the research year from
2009 to 2011. 46 firms did not disclose the annual report at the December fiscal year-end.
Finally, I got 94 firms which contribute to 282 observations in my sample.
In my empirical research, I use Tobin’s Q followed by Allayannis (2011) as a proxy to firm
value. Set the hedge dummy variable equal to 1 if firm reports the foreign currency
derivatives usage in the annual report. While, some factors including size, access to financial
market, profitability, investment growth, industry diversification, geographic diversification
leverage and advertisement expenditure also have impact on firm value. My empirical
research includes the univariate analysis and multivariate analysis.
In the univariate analysis, the firm characteristic and firm value differences between foreign
currency hedging and non-hedging observations are examined. Compared with non-hedging
firms, hedging firms have higher firm value, but the result is not statistically significant.
Concerning the control variables, the statistically significant differences with respect to the
effect of hedging on firm value are industry diversification, geographic diversification and
advertisement expenditure.
The univariate analysis just presents surface difference between the hedgers and
non-hedgers, however, the multivariate analysis enable the usage of detailed quantitative
information about the hedging position in the regression. Furthermore, the multivariate
analysis permits the inclusion of a set of control variables which may be associated with firm
value. Thus, the multivariate analysis can isolate the impact of foreign currency derivatives
on firm value from others factors. In my research, I use the Pooled OLS and Fixed-effect
regression in the multivariate analysis. The results from these regressions show that foreign
exchange rate hedging does not significantly influence firm value. The control variable firm
size has a negative coefficient and the coefficient is statistically significant in both regressions.
Furthermore, the control variable investment growth has a positive coefficient, but the
coefficient is just significant in the fixed-effect regression. The geographic diversification
shows a statistically significant and positive coefficient in the Pooled OLS regression.
The remainder of the paper is organized as follows: The background of hedging is presented
in chapter 2. The previous literature review is showed in chapter 3. The research method is
described in chapter 4. The detailed empirical results are presented in chapter 5 while
chapter 6 investigates the determinants of hedging activities. Chapter 7 is about the
discussion and limitation of empirical results. Section 7 concludes.
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
7
Chapter 2 Background of hedging
According to Modigliani and Miller (1985), a firm, managed by the value-maximizing agent,
in a world of perfect capital markets, with investors who have equal access to these markets,
would not engage in hedging activities, since these activities add no value to firm. Anything
the firm could accomplish through hedging could equally well be accomplished by the
investor acting on his or her own account3. However, in the real world, it is impossible to get
access to this perfect capital market. Financial theory suggests that corporate risk
management is a value creative activity in the presence of imperfection of capital market
such as bankruptcy costs, a convex tax schedule(smith and Stulz,1985), or underinvestment
problems(Smith and Stulz, 1985; Bessembinder1991). Recently, some empirical studies
provide some evidences in support of these theories. Some findings suggest that risk
management may come from the conflicts between managers and shareholders or earning
management and speculation (Core and Guay2002). Some researches try to investigate the
effect of derivative instrument on firm value with the presence of imperfect financial market.
The paragraph below will describe these imperfections in Modigliani and Miller model and
discuss the effect of hedging these imperfections on firm value.
2.1 The financial distress costs
In the real financial market, the financial distress, for instance, the payment to lawyers and
court costs, is costly, and shareholder are concerned whether the cash flow variability raise
the probability of financial distress 4.Cash flow volatility will contribute to a situation in
which a firm’s liquidity is insufficient to fully meet the fixed payment obligations, for instance
wages and interest payments, on time. Financial risk management can reduce the
profitability of encountering such situation and thus decrease the expected costs associated
with financial distress (Bratram 2003). Stulz(1996) demonstrates that hedging is assumed to
reduce the variability of cash flow and to reduce the probability of default, as shown in
figure1.
At the same time, if the gains of positive net present value project accrue primarily to the
fixed claimholders, then financial distress provides equityholders with incentive to abandon
this profitable project. Thus, the financial hedging reduces the probability of financial
distress and decreases the likelihood of equityholders passing up the valuable project. Dolde
(1995) and Haushalter(2000) confirm that companies which have a higher possibility of
financial distress with high debt ratio or leverage ratio, , will hedge more than the ones with
lower debt ratio.
3 Bartram (2011)
4 Stulz(1996)
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
8
Figure 1: Cash Flow distribution and Probability of Default
Risk management can reduce the probability and cost of financial distress, where X is the
level of Cash Flow where costs of financial distress begin to appear.
*Source: Valuation and Risk management (David A. DUbofsky and Thomas W.Miller)
2.2 Taxes
In U.S., as in the most countries, companies’ effective tax rates rises along with increase in
pre-tax income. Because of the convexity of the tax code, there are benefits to “managing”
taxable income so that as much of it as possible falls within an optimal range-that is, neither
too high nor too low5. For firms without using the hedging activities, their pre-tax income will
go through a “boom and bust” cycle. Under the convex tax schedule, a tax schedule that high
levels of taxable income should pay more tax than low levels, this “boom and bust” cycle of
pre-tax income will lead to a higher overall tax bill. A simple example in the table 1 below can
help illustrate this issue. Suppose the convex tax schedule is that tax rate of earning equal or
below 100,000 is 20% and the rate of earning above 100,000 is 30%. Firm A with hedging
activities has a smooth cash follow, while firm B without hedging activities has the cash flow
of higher volatility. With the same total earnings (200,000), firm A with hedging has a lower
overall taxes payment than firm B without hedging (Firm A pay 40,000 taxes overall while
firm B pay 50,000 taxes overall).
5 Stulz (1996)
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
9
Table 1: Tax reduction effect of risk management
Firm A
Firm B
Earnings Taxes Earnings Taxes
1st year 100,000 20,000 0 0
2nd year 100,000 20,000 200,000 50,000
Total
200,000 40,000 200,000 50,000
Thus, to some extent, risk management can lead to a lower tax payment over a complete
business cycle. Smith and Stulz (1985) also demonstrate that a firm can reduce expected tax
liabilities by using financial hedging instruments to smooth taxable income, which
contributes to an increase of firm value.
Because of the fact that hedging can reduce the financial distress, hedging activities will lead
to an increase of optimal debt-equity ratio. This ability of financial hedging activity therefore
increases the associated tax shield and finally increases firm value. Stulz (1996) and Leland
(1998) argue further that a reduction in cash-flow volatility through hedging can increase
debt capacity and generate greater tax benefits, and Graham and Rogers (2002) provide the
empirical support for this hypothesis.
2.3 Underinvestment
Risk management can increase shareholder’s value by harmonizing financing and investment
policies6. Because of high transaction cost, raising external capital is costly for firms, thus it is
possible that firm may underinvestment. The conflict between shareholders and debt
holders can also contributes to the problem of underinvestment. Under the situation that
firms’ leverage is high and shareholders only have a small residual claim on firm’s asset, the
problem of underinvestment is more likely to happen and the benefit of safe but profitable
investment projects accrue primarily to bondholders and may be rejected by the managers7.
A suitable and credible risk management program can help mitigate the underinvestment
problem through reducing the volatility of cash flows and firm value.
Furthermore, if financing an investment project by using the internal funds is cheaper than
financing it from the external funds, hedging is a value creative activity, the reason is due to
the fact that risk management allows the firm to support more positive net present value
projects. Mayers and Smith (1990) argue that the volatility of cash flows is positively related
to the costs of financial distress and the underinvestment problem. Thus, hedging is
predicted to have a positive effect on firm value. As the underinvestment is likely to be more
prominent in firms with higher leverage, significant growth and investment opportunities,
6 Froot, Scharfstein, and Stein (1993)
7 Bessenbinder (1991)
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
10
various measures such as the market-to-book ratio, research and development expenditure
to sales ratio, or capital expenditure to sales ratio are used for test the hypothesis with
respect to the underinvestment problem.
2.4 Management incentives
Because the conflicting interest in the agency relationship between managers and
shareholders, sometimes, managers have the incentive to use the derivatives for purposes
rather than hedging the risk. Most senior managers have a highly undiversified financial
position because they derive substantial (monetary and non-monetary) income from their
employment by the firm8. Consequently, risk aversion may cause managers to deviate from
acting purely in the best interest of shareholders (Stulz 1984; Mayer and Smith, 1982) by
investing lots of resource to hedge firm risk. Han (1996) and Stulz (1984) point out that
corporate risk management can mitigate this problem by linking manager’s payoff to firms’
stock price.
Additionally, managers can use the derivatives to speculate the movements of interest rate,
foreign currency exchange rate and commodity prices, which are supported by the previous
derivative survey. For instance, 90% of the derivatives users surveyed by Dolde (1993), and
over 40% of the firms surveyed by the Wharton Study of derivative usage (Bodnar 1995)
admit that they sometimes “take a view” about the movement of financial market when
they determine their derivative portfolios (Bartram 2003). Because speculative activity is on
average not expected to be related with firms’ underlying business exposure, derivative
activities used for this purpose are anticipated to increase, not reduce, firm risk9, which will
impact firms’ stock volatility and firm value.
8 Bartram (2003)
9 Bartram (2003)
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
11
Chapter 3 Previous literature review
Overall, the previous literatures on the derivative use in the non-financial firms focus on the
two parts. Firstly, many studies try to analyze the determinants and the theoretical
motivation behind the using of the derivatives. Some papers support that firms use the
derivatives instrument in order to reduce the risk exposure. While, others researches
conclude that firms use the derivatives for speculation or for solving the conflicts between
managers and shareholders instead of risk management. Secondly, many researchers try to
test the relationship between the financial derivative activities and firm value. However, the
relationship between firm value and general derivatives’ use is still mixed, both for U.S. and
non U.S. firms. There are several significant results, but they are not all consistent with the
valuation hypothesis. While so far most studies test what determines the firms’ decision to
use the derivatives instrument, very little researches test the fundamental issue that
whether these hedging activities increase firm value or not.
Before the 1990s, a firm’s derivative position is not disclosed and is considered as an
important component of firm’s strategy. Given this fact, little data can be used to test the
effect of derivative usage on firm value. Most research at that time are focus on the
theoretical parts, and most of these researches are derived from the friction to the classic
Modigliani and Miller model which states that in a world of perfect capital markets, in the
absence of taxes, bankruptcy costs, agency costs and asymmetric information, the value of a
firm is unaffected by how that firm is operated. Others researches which do the empirical
research collected the data by using the survey. For example, Nance, smith and Smithson
(1993) makes a research about the derivative usage by using a sample of 159 large U.S.
non-financial firms based on the response to the questionnaire. They find that firms which
employ the derivative to hedge the risk have more growth options and more convex tax
function. Geczy and Schrand (1997) studies a sample of 372 firms which are Fortune 500
firms in the United States, and their study result shows that firms with greater growth
options, extensive foreign exchange rate exposure, tighter financial constraints, and
economies of scale in hedging activities are more likely to use the foreign currency
derivatives.
Since 1990s, the companies were required to report their notional amount of derivative
usage and derivative usage situation in the footnotes of the annual report. 1997 GAAP
pertaining to disclosure about financial derivatives is contained in the statement of Financial
Accounting Standard No.199 (SPSA 119). “Disclosure about derivative financial instrument
and fair value of financial instruments” was released in 1994. As accounting disclosure
requirement was regulated in the early 1990s, more academic and empirical researches have
examined the derivative usage by the nonfinancial firms. Most of these researches used the
U.S. nonfinancial firms as a sample, because information becomes more available and more
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
12
firms use the derivative in the U.S.
Bartram, Brown and Fehle (2003) makes a very large scale research on the derivative usage
in 50 countries by using a sample of 7,319 non-financial firms which together comprise
about 80% of the global market capitalization, and provides evidence that hedging is a value
creative corporate activity. At a basic level, this study finds strong evidence supporting the
hypothesis that interest rate risk management is closely related with higher firm value for
both the U.S. and international firms. But the result does not indicate whether the use of
foreign currency derivatives usage is also closely associated with firm value or not.
Concerning the determinants of firms’ risk management by using derivative activity, this
research finds evidence that the use of foreign derivative is, in fact, risk management rather
than simply speculation (Bartram 2003). For instance, firms that use foreign currency
derivatives have higher proportions of foreign asset, sales, and income and firms that use
interest rate derivatives have higher leverage10.
Bratram, Brown and Conrad (2011) also use a very large scale sample of non-financial firms
from 47 countries to test the effect of derivative use on firm risk and fire value. This research
uses a new method to reduce the effect of omitted variables bias and to improve the quality
of the result and finds a strong evidence to support the hypothesis that using the financial
derivative reduces both the total and systematic risk. However, this research still does not
make a clear conclusion that the derivatives activity would lead to higher firm value
compared with the firms without using the risk management activity. It mentions that the
effect of derivative use on firm value is positive but more sensitive to endogeneity and
omitted variable, however the usage of derivatives is related with firm value, abnormal
returns and larger profits during the economic downturn in 2001-2002, suggesting that firms
are hedging downside risk11.
Allayannis and Weston (2001) directly tests the potential impact of foreign currency
derivatives on firm value by using a big sample of 720 larger non-financial firms from 1990 to
1995 in U.S. Using Tobin’s Q defined as the ratio market value to replacement cost of assets,
this research concludes that the use of foreign currency derivative is positively related with
firms’ value. Specially, it finds strong evidence to support the hypothesis that firms which are
facing the foreign currency exposure and choose to use the foreign currency derivative, on
average, have a higher value as much as 4.87% than firms which do not use the foreign
currency derivatives. It also demonstrates that firms that begin a hedging policy experience
an increase in firm value above these firms that choose to remain un-hedged and that firms
that quit hedging activities experience a decrease in value relative to those firms that choose
10
Bratram (2003) 11
Bratram (2011)
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
13
to remain hedged12. Graham and Roger (2002) by using a broad sample also has a similar
conclusion that the derivatives use has a positive effect on the debt capacity and this debt
capacity leads to 1.1% firm value premium on average. While, Guay(2002) identifying an
initial sample of the 1000 largest non-financial firms as of the end of 1995 also tries to
estimate the relationship between the usage of derivatives and firm value. Contrary to
Allayannis(2001), this research indicates that even if firms with derivative usage have much
more information about the directional movements in interest rates, exchange rates and
commodity prices, most of the derivative positions appear too small to increase the firm
value by 4.87% as Allayannis(2001) demonstrates. Consistent with this conclusion, Jin and
Jorion(2006) also finds an insignificant effects of hedging on market value by using a sample
of oil and gas producers.
After Allayannis and Weston (2001), some researchers have focused on the estimation the
effect of the financial instruments on firm value. Some researchers exactly implement the
initial model used by Allayannis and Weston (2001), while others adjust it to the special
economic environment or industry situation. For instance, Carter, Rogers and Simkins (2004)
examine the relationship between the derivatives use and firm value in the U.S. airline
industry. Since the fuel cost accounts for on average 13% of firms operational cost, using the
derivative instrument to hedge the volatility of fuel price is a justifiable strategy for these
firms in the airline industry. The authors following the model of Allayannis(2001) with a little
adjustment find that hedging activity in the airline industry contributes to a premium of
14.94%-16.08% increase on firm value and the result is statistically significant at the level of
10% and 1%. The size of the hedging premium is much bigger than the one of Allayannis and
Weston (2001), which may be due to the fact that the firms in the airline industry spent a
larger income on fuel and this fact heavily influences the firm value. At the same time,
Weston (2001) and Carter (2004) also repeat the previous analysis in order to identify the
major source of hedging premium. They find that capital expenditures are valued higher for
the firms with fuel price hedging activity, and the positive ability of hedging to stabilize and
protect capital expenditure and to avoid underinvestment contribute to the 52%-100% of the
firm value premium on average.
Another empirical researchs also following the Allayannis and Weston (2001), but focus on
the U.S oil and gas producer industry are Jin and Jorion (2006) and Carter, Rogers and
Simkins (2004). The main contribution of Jin and Jorion (2006) is a new and simple
estimation of Tobin’s Q which is also proxy for firms’ value. Contrary to Allayannis and
Weston (2001), Carter, Rogers and Simkins (2004) shows that the derivative usage does not
have a significant impact on firm value. But it discloses that the usage of derivative reduce
the price sensitivity with respect to oil and gas prices. The authors attribute the
establishment of hedging to the personal benefit of the management team. Concerning the
12
Allayannis and Weston (2001)
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
14
hedging premium, the authors attribute it to the factors such as the information asymmetry
or the operational hedging which could be positively associated with the derivative usage.
From the perspective of managerial motives, Hagelin, Knopf and Prambory (2004) find the
evidence to prove that the firm value will decrease when the hedging activity is based on the
motivations from manager’s stock options. The authors make a conclusion that if the
hedging activities are used to reduce the stock price sensitivity of managerial stock options,
hedging will lead to a value discount. From the perspective of agency costs and monitoring
problems, the Fauver(2010) uses the derivative usage sample about over 1745 firms in the
U.S. during the period from 1991 to 2000, and finds that firms having greater agency and
monitoring problems (i.e., less transparent, greater agency costs, weaker corporate
governance, lager information asymmetry problem, poorer monitoring) are likely to have the
negative association between Tobin’s Q and derivative usage.
Except doing the research in the United States, some empirical researches also employ the
sample from other countries to test the effect of derivatives use on firm value. Berrospide,
Amiyatosh and Uday (2008) test the relationship between the foreign currency derivative
usage and firm value on Brazilian firm and find that firms using the derivative instruments
have a 6.7% to 7.8% higher value than firms without using the foreign currency derivatives.
They also make a conclusion that hedging with foreign currency derivatives permits the firm
to sustain larger capital investment and to reduce the sensitivity of investment to internally
generated funds, which has a positive influence on the mitigation of underinvestment
problems13 . Ameer and Rashid (2009) examine the statement of derivative usage in
Malaysian and try to evaluate the value-relevance of the notional amount of foreign
exchange and interest rate derivatives over the period between 2003 and 2007, however,
since few firms in Malaysian employed the derivatives, this research dose not find an
significant relationship between the derivative usage and firm value.
13
Amiyatosh and Uday (2008)
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
15
Chapter4: research method
4.1 The sample collection and data collection
I examined the Fortune 200 firms in the U.S. from 2009 to 2011. I focused on these large
firms because previous literature showed that they larger firms are more likely to be
derivatives users (Nance 1993; Graham and Rogers 2002). From the initial sample, I selected
every firm by some criterions which I will describe below and reduced the sample to 94 firms.
This sample reduction permits my following hand collection with a significant quantity of
information about each firm’s derivatives position from the form 10-K annual report which I
downloaded from the database of the SEC (U.S. Security Exchange Commission). Note, even
though I gathered the derivative data from 2009 to 2011, I selected the sample from the
Fortune 200 firms as of 2011. In order to determine a desired sample for this research, it is
required to identify firms which have the foreign exchange rate exposure. In my research, a
firm is considered to have the foreign currency exposure if it reports foreign sales or income,
foreign asset or foreign debt in the three-year research period.
The criterions used in my research to collect the suitable firms are as followed. (a) Financial
firms should be excluded from the sample, since these firms are also derivative makers and
have different purpose for derivative using compared with the non-financial firms. Among
the initial 200 firms, 41 firms are financial firms. (b) 4 Firms having big merger or acquisition
activity between 2009 and 2011 are also dropped from my study. (c) Restricting the sample
to December year-end firms improve the analysis result with high quality, since it allows the
consistent assumptions about the financial market, and by this criterion I omited 24 firms
from the sample. (d) This criterion requires that firms have published a 10-K annual report
which can be retrieved from the database of the U.S. Securities and Exchange commission
(SEC) during my research period. These 10-K annual reports provide useful and accurate
information about the foreign currency derivative position at fiscal-year end. Without this
information from the 10-K report, it would be very difficult and practically impossible to
determine firms’ financial derivative instrument and to do the empirical analysis. Among the
200 firms, 22 firms do not meet this criterion. (e) Finally, 15 firms which do not mention any
foreign sale, foreign asset or foreign liability are also expected from my sample, since these
firms can be considered having little exposure to foreign exchange rate risk. At last, I got 94
firms and these firms have non-missing data about size (nature logarithmic of total asset)
and market value. To sum up, the number of firms that fulfill these above criterions is 94
from 2009 to 2011, which contributes to the balanced panel data of 282 firm-year
observations (both time-series and cross-sectional data). The main advantages of a balanced
panel data approach is that it allows for the control of individual heterogeneity, it gives more
informative data, more degree of freedom and more efficiency, at the same time, it can
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
16
eliminates some potential bias due to the aggregation over firms or individual14.
The new accounting standards are one of the reasons why I choose to pick up the sample in
U.S. The available data due to the regulation of the accounting standards make it possible to
make the empirical research to investigate the effect of foreign currency derivatives on firm
value. According to the International Financial Reports Standards (I.F.R.S.), firms must
disclose in their annual report whether they use derivative or not and their purpose is for
hedging or trading. At the same time, they have to report the information about the whole
specters of the risk they face in their business operations and the activity they take to handle
these risks. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 105 requires all firms to
report information about financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk. For example,
futures, forwards, options and swaps. Before the implementation of these disclosure
regulations the sole method to get the derivative information is by the survey activity. SEC
requires firms to report seven specific parts of information about financial derivative in their
footnotes of annual report. The section “Quantitative market risk disclosures” requires firms
to provide detailed and prospective information on the market risks that can be related with
the firm’s active position in financial instruments. The quantitative information about the
firms risk and the financial instruments make it possible for readers of the financial
statements to interpret the market risk which firms face in their business activity.
In this part, I will describe the process of data collection. I obtained the 10-K fillings annual
report of these 94 firms from the database of U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (ESC).
Extracting the information about the foreign currency derivatives position from the 10-K
reports was done manually. In most of the 10-K form reports, the section 7a called
“Quantitative and Qualitative disclosure about the market risk” provides much more detailed
information about the market risk that the firm faces and the derivative usage position for
each market risk. Furthermore, footnotes of the financial statements present valuable and
detailed information about the active hedging position of the firm as well.
For each firm I collected the detailed and useful data by searching information in the annual
reports about the financial derivative position. In order to capture all relevant hedging
information in the 10-K reports of all observations, a manual search is carried out to
investigate all related words about the foreign currency derivatives. I search the following
important keywords on hedging: “hedge”, “hedging” “risk”, “derivative”, “foreign currency”,
“interest rate”, “commodity price”, “forward”, “swap”, “option”, “future”, “collar”, “market
risk”, “risk management”, “call ” etc. Firms are classified as foreign currency derivative
users, if their annual reports mention the use of foreign currency derivatives exactly. The
others are classified as non-foreign currency derivative. To improve the quality of data
collection in my research, I also try to collect the data about notional amount of these
14
Baltagi (1995).
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
17
derivatives. Unfortunately, few firm disclosures this information. Thus, a hedging dummy is
used in my following analysis, and it indicates to “1” when the company has the derivatives
instrument and to “0” when the company was not active in hedging position in that fiscal
year.
Besides the hedging data, the data used to calculate the dependent variable which is Firm
value (Tobin’s Q) and other control variables, like firm size, leverage, profitability, investment
growth, access to financial market, industry diversification, geographic diversification and
advertisement expenditure, are also extracted from annual report .The calculation about the
firm value (Tobin’s Q) and other control variables will be described in the following part.
4.2 Firm value
In order to determine whether foreign currency derivatives add firm value or not, it is
necessary to measure this value. Followed by Allayannis (2001), I use Tobin’s Q as a proxy for
a firm’s market value. Tobin’s Q is defined as the ratio of market value of the firm to the
replacement cost of asset, which is evaluated at the end of the fiscal year for each firm. If
Tobin’s Q has the value higher than one unit, the market appreciates the value of the firm to
be higher than the next best use of firm’s assets which is the replacement cost (Kapitsinas
2008).The methodology for constructing the replacement cost employed by Allayannis(2001),
and Lewellen and Badrinath(1997) is the sum of the replacement cost of fixed asset plus
inventories. However, due to the lack of data, the replacement cost of the firm’s asset is hard
to determine. Thus, in my research, I estimate Tobin’s Q in an algorithm undertaken by most
of the previous researchers in similar studies which use the book value of total assets as an
approximation of the replacement value of the assets. Ultimately, the formula used to
determine the firm value (Tobin’s Q) in my research is:
𝑄 =𝐵𝑜𝑜𝑘 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡 − 𝐵𝑜𝑜𝑘 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑡𝑦 + 𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑡 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑐𝑜𝑚𝑚𝑜𝑛 𝑒𝑢𝑞𝑖𝑡𝑦
𝐵𝑜𝑜𝑘 𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑢𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑡
4.3 Control variable
To effectively explain the effect of foreign currency derivative usage on firm value, it needs to
exclude the noise resulting from other variables which also have effect on firm value. Based
on the literature review, several control variables which are assumed to have a relationship
with the dependent variable are selected. As followed, I will describe these control variables,
the theoretical reasons why I choose these factors as control variables in my research and
the expected relationships between these control variables and firm value.
4.3.1 Size
According to the previous literature, there are lots of empirical researches on the effect of
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
18
the size on the determinant of derivative instruments. For example, Bartram, Brown and
Stulz(2011) find that firm size is an important determinant of both total risk and systematic
risk. Booth, Smith and Stolz(1984) State that because setting up an effective hedging
program is related to the economies of scale, larger firms are more likely to use the
derivative instrument compared with the smaller companies.
The evidence about the effect of firm size on firm value is ambiguous. Larger firms have
more capital and human resource which contribute to economies of scale and high
profitability, thus a positive relationship is expected. However, some previous literature point
out that the relationship between firm value and firm size is negative. Warner (1977) find
that the direct cost of financial distress is not positively associated with firm size. Therefore,
the benefits stemming from hedging activities are expected to be greater for smaller firms
than for larger firms (Smith and Stulz, 1985). Allayannis (2001) also find evidence to support
that the relationship between the firm size and firm value is negative. In my research, I use
the nature log of total asset which is measured by the book value of total asset to control
this variable.
4.3.2 Profitability
It is expected that higher profitable firms have a higher firm value on average. Firms with
higher profitability are expected to have lower financial distress costs and have more
resource to invest in the positive net present value project, which lead to higher cash flow to
equity holders. The high returns of profitable firms will be reflected in the stock price, which
will consequently have a positive impact on the market value of the firm. All these benefits
will lead to a higher firm value and higher Tobin’s Q for the higher profitable firms. In order
to adjust the effect of profitability on firm value, the return of asset which is defined as the
ratio of net income to total asset is used as a control variable and the coefficient between
the profitability and Tobin’s Q is expected to be positive.
4.3.3 Investment growth
Myers(1977), Smith and Watts(1992) have found that firm value depends on the future
opportunities. If there are lots of investment opportunities available to the firms, it seems
that this firm has the capability to generate more cash flow to the firm and to the
shareholders. Consequently, this will be reflected in the stock price. So, the firm value of a
firm having much more investment opportunities will be higher compared with the one of a
firm with limited set of investment opportunities, which is supported by the result form
Allayannis(2001). As an indicator of investment opportunities for the company, the ratio of
capital expenditure to total sale is employed. Companies with high percentage of capital
expenditure are expected to have higher Tobin’s Q. At the same time, the Allayannis(2001)
also point out that intangible asset, for instance, consumer goodwill, also affect firm value
for the same reason as capital expenditure. Similar to Morck and Yeung (1991) and Allayannis
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
19
(2001), I use the percentage of advertising cost to total sales as a proxy for the consumer
goodwill.
4.3.4 Leverage
A firm capital structure also has effect on firm value. Graham and Rogers (2002)
demonstrated that the increase in debt capacity and leverage associated with hedging
contribute to an increase in firm value by an average of about 1.1% increase. However, too
much debt will means high risk of bankruptcy and the expected bankruptcy costs, which
leads to low premium of firm value and low expectation from shareholders. All the
advantages and disadvantages resulting from leverage will be incorporated by investors and
be reflected in the share price of the firms. Thus, it is necessary to include one control
variable to filter out the effect of leverage on firm value. In my research, I use the control
variable defined as the ratio of long-term debt to book equity as a proxy for leverage.
4.3.5 Access to financial market
The position of accessing to financial market is closed related with the probability of
underinvestment problems for non-financial firms. Thus firm value may be also associated
with firm’s access to financial market. If firms’ internal capital resource is limited and the
ability of getting access to the financial market is also restricted, the firm will only be able to
invest the project with the highest net present value or forgo this project which can
contribute cash flows to shareholders. This capital restriction will yield to a lower total return
for the firm. Consequently, this will lead to a lower share price and to a lower firm value. As
most literatures do, the payment of dividend can be interpreted as the ability to get access
to the financial market, since these firms which have the capital to pay the dividend are less
likely to be financially constrained. In my research, I use dummy variable to control whether
firm get access to financial market or not. If firm pays the dividend in that year, the dividend
dummy variable is equal to 1. If it does not pay the dividend, then the dummy variable
equals to 0.
4.3.6 Industry diversification
There are several researches about the effect of corporate diversification on firm value or
firm performance. Larry and Stulz (1993) demonstrate that through the late 1970s and the
1980s, single diversified firms are valued more highly by the capital markets than diversified
firms, and highly diversified firms (defined as those firms that report sales for five segments
or more) have both a mean and a median Tobin’s q below the sample average for each firm.
Additionally, other arguments also suggest that the outgrowth of agency problems between
managers and shareholders is negatively associated with firm value. However, other
researches, for example Willianson(1970) and Lewellen(1986), supported that industry
diversification increase firm value. I use dummy variable to control the effect of industry
diversification. If firm report that it operates in more than one segment in the 10-K annual
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
20
report, the dummy variable of industry diversification equals to 1. Otherwise, it equals to 0.
4.3.7 Geographic diversification
In previous literature, some authors indicated that geographic diversification or
multinationality has positive effect on firm value. Coase(1937) and Dunning(1973) find
several reasons to explain why multinationality does in fact add share value. Firstly, some
intangible asset, such as increasing production skill or superb consumer goodwill, will
promote the firm to make some foreign direct investment, which will contribute to the
increase of firm value. Secondly, because of the imperfect world capital market, the
institutional constraints on international capital flows, information asymmetries and other
reasons make it difficult for investors to optimally diversify their portfolio internationally in a
direct manner. However, multinational firms can offer shareholders this opportunities by
their direct investment abroad. These benefits will be reflected in share prices and thus lead
to a relatively high stock price for these multinational firms. However, some researchers also
pointed out that, like industry diversification, the geographic diversification also cause the
outgrowth of agency problem, which is negatively associated with firm value. In my research,
firms which have business operation outside the USA are considered as multinational firms.
To control for the effect of geographic diversification, I use the ratio of foreign sale to total
sales as a continuous measure of multinationality.
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
21
Chapter 5 Empirical research
5.1 Summary statistics of derivative use
The Table 2 reports the percentage of firms using derivatives of different types from 2009 to
2011. Among the whole sample of 94 non-financial firms, about 72%, 69% and 71% of firms
use the foreign currency derivative in 2009, 2010 and 2011 respectively and the result is
showed in panel 1. The statistical summary for interest rate usage is presented in panel 2.
68%, 63% and 64% of my sample use the interest rate derivative to reduce the interest rate
exposure respectively during my research period. At last, panel 3 presents the result for
commodity price usage situation, which is 43%, 42% and 43% in 2009, 2010 and 2011
respectively.
Across the whole sample of 94 firm of Fortune 200, most common is the use of foreign
exchange rate derivatives (around 70%), followed closely by interest rate derivatives (around
65%) with commodity price derivative a distant third(around 42%). Bartram(2003) also made
a similar summary about these three kinds of derivative usage situation about 2841 firms in
U.S. in 2000 and the results show that 63.2%, 34.7% and 16.7% of firm use the foreign
currency derivative, interest rate derivative and commodity price derivative respectively.
Compared with Bartram(2003), among my sample all three kinds of derivative instrument
have higher usage rate. This can be illustrated by two reasons. Firstly, as the financial market
become more and more mature in U.S., more firms choose to use the derivatives instrument
to hedge the risk. Secondly, as most literatures point out, bigger firms are more likely to use
the financial derivatives because of the high cost to get access to the derivative market.
Table 2
Summary of hedging activities by years
This table reports the summary statistics for derivative usage situation which covers the foreign
currency derivative usage, interest rate derivative usage and commodity price derivative in the fiscal
year-end 2009, 2010 and 2011. The initial sample includes all top furniture 200 firms from the U.S. in
2011. Among this initial sample, 41 firms are financial firms, 4 firms have big merger or acquisition
activities during my research period, 46 firms did not report the annual report at the December
year-end and 15 firms are not have foreign sales, foreign asset or foreign liability. Finally, my research
sample contains 94 firms which contribute to the panel data of 282 observations. The panel A, panel B
and panel C below present the foreign currency derivative, interest rate derivative, commodity price
derivative usage situation in the fiscal-end year 2009, 2010 and 2011 respectively.
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
22
Panel A: foreign currency derivative
Year Observations Hedgers Non-hedgers Percentage
2009 94 68 26 72.34%
2010 94 65 29 69.15%
2011 94 67 27 71.28%
Panel B: Interest rate derivative
Year Observations Hedgers Non-hedgers Percentage
2009 94 64 30 68.09%
2010 94 60 34 63.83%
2011 94 61 33 64.89%
Panel C: Commodity price derivative
Year Observations Hedgers Non-hedgers Percentage
2009 94 41 53 43.62%
2010 94 40 54 42.55%
2011 94 53 41 56.38%
5.2 Sample description
In this paragraph, I will describe the firm characteristics of the 282 observations of my
research sample. The subsamples are classified according to whether the firm has the foreign
currency derivative instruments to hedge the foreign exchange rate risk or not. In my
research, the firm characteristics consistent of firm size, profitability, access to financial
market, leverage, advertisement expenditure, industry diversification and geographic
diversification. These characteristics are analyzed not only for the complete sample, but also
for sub samples.
Table 3
Summary of firm characteristics
The table below shows the firm characteristics of the sample consisting of 94 firms in the period from
2009 to 2011 which contribute to the panel data of 282 observations. The chosen firm characteristics
are geographic diversification (the foreign sale divided by the total sale), size( the natural logarithmic
of total asset), profitability( the net income divided by total asset), leverage(long –term debt divided
by the shareholders’ equity), investment growth(the capital expenditure divided by total sales),
advertisement exp(advertisement cost divided by total sales), dividend(dummy variable and equals to
1 if firms pay the dividend), industry diver( dummy variable and equals to 1 if firms have more than
one segment), Tobin’s Q ( nature logarithmic the ratio of market value of common stock plus the book
liability to the total asset). The table firstly presents these firm characteristics of all observations, then
presents the ones with foreign currency derivatives usage, and finally presents the ones with no
foreign currency derivatives usage.
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
23
The table 3 above presents the summary statistics of the main firm characteristics of the
firms in the sample which consists of 94 firms and 282 firm-year observations. I used the
mean, median, maximum, minimum and standard deviation to basically describe these firm
characteristics. Compared with subsample without foreign currency derivatives usage, the
subsample with foreign currency derivatives usage has a higher mean value of Tobin’s Q.
For the full sample, the standard deviation of Tobin’s Q is relatively large, which means that
my research sample includes some firms with high Tobin’s Q as well as some firms with low
Tobin’s Q, which is very good for my research. One firm characteristic that is deserved to be
mentioned is leverage. For the all observations, the maximum leverage is 279.429 and the
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Observations Mean Median Maximum Minimum Std.Dev
Total sample 282
Geographic Diver 202 0.402 0.425 0.893 0 0.213
Size 282 4.477 4.478 5.893 3.762 0.397
Profitability 282 0.071 0.06 0.871 -0.147 0.081
Leverage 277 1.76 0.493 279.429 -53.979 17.657
Investment 260 0.054 0.034 0.598 0 0.036
Advertisement Exp 153 0.022 0.02 0.717 0 0.088
Dividend 282 0.798 1 1 0 0.402
Industry Diver 282 0.801 1 1 0 0.399
Ln(Tobin’s Q) 282 0.422 0.349 1.739 -0.192 0.362
Hedgers 200
Geographic Diver 165 0.41 0.426 0.893 0 0.202
Size 200 4.484 4.49 5.893 3.762 0.392
Profitability 200 0.07 0.059 0.241 -0.147 0.061
Leverage 195 1.214 0.494 70.196 -9.879 5.271
Investment 185 0.027 0.035 0.598 0.001 0.072
Advertisement Exp 103 0.032 0.025 0.717 0.002 0.104
Dividend 200 0.79 1 1 0 0.407
Industry Diver 200 0.835 1 1 0 0.371
Ln(Tobin’s Q) 200 0.436 0.333 1.739 -0.192 0.389
Non hedgers 82
Geographic Diver 37 0.365 0.392 0.734 0 0.255
Size 82 4.458 4.371 5.52 3.867 0.407
Profitability 82 0.072 0.061 0.871 -0.11 0.115
Leverage 82 3.06 0.476 279.429 -53.979 31.379
Investment 75 0.058 0.03 0.314 0.003 0.067
Advertisement Exp 50 0.012 0.015 0.067 0 0.018
Dividend 82 0.817 1 1 0 0.387
Industry Diver 82 0.72 1 1 0 0.449
Ln(Tobin’s Q) 82 0.387 0.354 1.088 -0.08 0.283
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
24
minimum is -53.979, which implies that in the sample some firms have a very high long-term
debt and some firms have a very small even negative shareholders’ equity. Concerning other
control variables, on average, the value of size and advertisement expenditure of hedger
firms is bigger than the same firm characteristics of non-hedgers. However, the firm
characteristics of investment growth and profitability for firms with hedging activities are
lower than the same characteristics of firms without hedging instruments.
5.3 Univariate analysis
The main hypothesis that the previous hedging literature deals with is that firms that the
derivatives usages for hedging are rewarded by investors with higher value compared with
non-users, thus a significant difference of firm value between the hedgers and non-hedgers
should be expected. This part will examine and statistically test whether the firm value
measured by Tobin’s Q is different between the firms using foreign currency derivatives and
the ones without using foreign currency derivatives. The 282 observations are classified as
hedger or non-hedger based on whether the firm uses the foreign currency derivative or not.
By conducting the univariate analysis, it is possible to test the difference of firm value
between the foreign currency hedgers and foreign currency non hedgers. The difference of
firm characteristics, firm size, profitability, investment growth, leverage, access to financial
market, industry diversification, geographic diversification, and advertisement expenditure
are also tested by employing this analysis. This statistical test is performed by using the
student t-test and the for the firm characteristics (Tobin’s Q, size, profitability, leverage,
investment growth, access to financial market, industry diversification, geographic
diversification and advertisement expenditure) equal variances are not assumed.
The table 4 below reports the results obtained from the statistical test. Column 1 and
Column2 describe the mean value for the firm characteristics of the sub sample foreign
currency hedging observations and sub sample non foreign currency hedging observations.
The mean differences of firm characteristics between these two sub-samples are presented
in column 3. The column 4 and column 5 show the t-statistics and the p-value with two tailed
respectively. The p-value is important since it can be used as a statistical support to make a
conclusion whether the Tobin’ s Q and firm characteristics with foreign currency derivative
usage and without foreign currency derivatives usage are statistically different with each
other. In my empirical analysis, the result is considered to be significant different from zero at
5% level, if the P-value is below than 0.05.
Table 4
Univariate Analysis: Foreign currency hedging versus non-foreign currency hedging
The table below shows the result of univariate analysis which statistically tests the difference of
Tobin’s Q and firm characteristics between firms with foreign currency derivative activities and firms
without foreign currency derivatives activities. The sample of univariate analysis consists of 94 firms
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
25
which are included in Fortune 200 in the U.S. from 2009 to 2011. The column 1 and column 2 show
the mean value of variable of the firms which use the derivative and which do not use the derivative
respectively. The column 3 shows the difference of the mean values presented in column 1 and
column 2. The column 4 and column 5 present the statistical information about the student t-statistics
and the p-value. The Tobin’ Q is defined as the ratio of market value of common stock plus the book
liability to the total book asset. The explanatory variable is foreign currency derivative dummy variable
which equals to 1 if firms report the foreign currency derivative usage in the annual report. The
control variable include size( the nature logarithmic of total book asset), profitability( the ratio of net
income to total book asset), Investment growth(the ratio of vthe capital expenditure to sales),
leverage (the ratio of long term debt to the book shareholder’s equity), dividend( dummy variable
equals to 1 if firm pay the dividend), industry diver(dummy variable equals to 1 if firms have more
than one segment operations), advertisement exp( the ratio of advertisement cost to sales),
geographic Diver( the ratio of foreign sales outside the U.S.A. to sales). The estimations are conducted
by using the Stata econometric software.
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Variable Hedger Nonhedger difference t-statistics P-value
(200) (82) (Mean)
(2-tailed)
Ln(Tobin’s Q) 0.436 0.386 0.493 1.037 0.150
Size 4.484 4.458 0.026 0.500 0.309
Profitability 0.070 0.072 -0.001 0.102 0.459
Investments 0.057 0.063 -0.006 0.625 0.266
Leverage 1.214 3.060 -1.846 0.793 0.214
Dividend 0.790 0.817 -0.027 0.513 0.304
Industry Diver 0.835 0.720 0.115 2.219 0.014
Advertisement Exp 0.053 0.021 0.032 0.473 0.019
Geographic Diver 0.338 0.167 0.171 5.333 0.000
As showed in the Table 4, the univariate analysis demonstrates that the firms with foreign
currency derivative activities have higher firm value (Tobin’s Q) compared with the ones
without foreign currency derivative activities, however, the result is not statistically
significant, since the P-value is bigger than 0.05. It is possible to conclude that there is no
statistical difference between the firm value of foreign currency hedging and one of
non-foreign currency hedging.
According to the result from the univariate analysis, the two-tailed p value of advertisement
expenditure, the industry diversification and the geographic diversification is smaller than
0.05, which show that the means value concerning these firm characteristics of these two
subsamples are statistically different from each other. By conducting the univariate analysis,
it can be concluded that firms with foreign currency derivatives activities may have higher
Tobin’s Q and these firm have these firm characteristics with lower advertisement
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
26
expenditure, higher industry diversification and higher geographic diversification. Concerning
other control variables, I want to highlight the geographic diversification. The mean
difference of this variable between these two subsamples is 17.1% and the P-value is 0.000,
and this result shows that firms that use the foreign currency derivative have higher
proportions of foreign sales, which may provide some support for the argument that firms
are hedging rather than speculating with the derivatives to some extent. Bartram(2011) also
shows that derivatives users are significantly more geographically diversified. Unfortunately,
other control variables ((Size, profitability, leverage, dividend, investment growth) do not
show statistically significant difference between hedgers and non-hedgers.
The univariate analysis gave us a surface understanding of the relationship between the firm
value measured by Tobin’s Q and foreign currency derivatives usage measured by dummy
variable, and also show the characteristics of the firms with foreign currency derivative
activity compared with these without the usage of foreign currency derivative. However, the
univariate analysis does not take some unobservable factors into account. It is just consider
whether the foreign currency activities has effect on firm value or not and it does not qualify
this effect, however the multivariable analysis can overcome this problem and qualify the
relationship between using of foreign currency derivative and firm value. Moreover, the
multivariate analysis can also include the control variables, which makes it possible to
investigate and isolate the effect of foreign currency derivatives on firm value. Therefore, the
following part will focus on the multivariate analysis to investigate the relationship between
the using of foreign currency derivatives and firm value.
5.4 Multivariate analysis
In this paragraph, I will present and examine the result of multivariable analysis. As previous
paragraph, the univariate analysis just gives the surface relationship of firm value and the
usage of foreign currency derivative. However, the multivariable analysis will give the deeper
understanding of this relationship. It will isolate the effect of foreign currency derivative
usage on firm value. In this analysis, the same control variable, as described in the univariate
analysis, will be included to control the influence coming from the control variables on firm
value and to isolate the real effect of foreign currency derivatives usage on firm value.
The multivariate analysis is estimated based on the following regression models:
ln (Q) = α + β ∗ Hedge_dummy + ∑ 𝛾𝑖 ∗ 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑙_𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑖
+ 𝜀
Q is the dependent variable which describes firm value in my research. Since the mean value
of Tobin’s Q is higher than the median value of Tobin’s Q, suggesting that the distribution of
Tobin’s Q is skewed, in the multivariate analysis, I use the nature logarithmic of Tobin’s Q as a
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
27
proxy for firm value. The Hedge_dummy is the explanatory variable which describes whether
the firms have the foreign currency derivative activity or not. The coefficient of the hedge
dummy β is interpreted as a premium or a discount on firm value because of the hedging
activities, depending on the sign of the coefficient. However, other factors also have
influence on firm value in my research. These factors are control_variables which are
size( the nature logarithmic of total book asset), profitability( the ratio of net income to total
book asset), investment growth( the ratio of the capital expenditure to total sales), leverage
(the ratio of long term debt to the book shareholder’s equity), dividend( dummy variable
equals to 1 if firm pays the dividend and to 0 if firm does not pay the dividend), industry
diver(dummy variable equals to 1 if firm has more than one segment operations and equals
to 1 if firm focuses on one segment), advertisement exp( the ratio of advertisement cost to
total sales) and geographic Diver( the ratio of foreign sales outside the U.S.A. to total sales)
in my research. Because there are many variables even unobservable variables which also
have effect on firm value and it is impossible to contain all these variables in one model, the
random disturbance term denoted by 𝜀 is added.
Followed by Allaynnis(2001), in my research I use two regression methods. One is pooled
Ordinary Least Squares regression (Pooled OLS regression) and the other is the fixed-effect
regression. The Pooled-OLS regression pools the data and estimate an OLS regression. The
pooled OLS regression is a most common method to analysis the panel data. However,
sometimes, it is leads to some biased estimator, since the pooled OLS regression does not
take into the effect of the individual heterogeneity. Due to this reason, I also use the fixed
effect regression to test the relationship between the firm value and the foreign currency
derivative usage. In fixed effect regression, the unobserved heterogeneity is no longer a
problem, since in this model, the assumption that the unobserved factors are unrelated with
the control variable or explanatory variable is no longer needed.
The following part will show my statistical regression result about the effect of foreign
currency derivative usage and other control variables on firm value. The Pooled OLS
regression will firstly be presented and then the Fixed-effect regression.
The table 5 describes the result of multivariable analysis by using the Pooled OLS regression.
The missing data advertisement expenditure has big influence on the sample size, but based
on the previous literature and research (Allayannis,2001; Kapitsinas,2008). This variable is
important to control in order to get the real relationship between the firm value and foreign
currency derivative usage. Thus, I did not omit this variable form my research. The column
one shows the result of Pooled OLS regression without the control variable of advertisement
expenditure. The column 2 shows the result Pooled OLS regression with all control variables
that may have influence on firm value.
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
28
Table 5
The Pooled OLS regression: the relationship between foreign currency derivative usage and
firm value
This table presents the result of Pooled OLS regression on the use of foreign currency derivative on
firm value. The missing data advertisement expenditure has big influence on the number of
observations, but previous literatures demonstrate that this variable also have significant impact on
firm value. Thus, the Pooled OLS regression is done twice for these two situations, which are
presented in column 1 and column 2 separately. The column 1 presents the Pooled OLS regression
result without the control variables of advertisement expenditure. The column 2 presents the result of
pooled OLS regression with all control variables. For every control variable, the result firstly shows the
coefficient whose sign determines that the relationship is positive or negative, and below the
coefficient the P-value which determines the result is statistically significant or not is presented. The
Tobin’s Q, foreign currency derivative dummy and the control variables have the same definition as
the univariate analysis in the previous part. The estimations are conducted by using the Stata
econometric software.
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
29
Pooled OLS
Ln(Tobin's Q) (1) (2)
Foreign currency dummy 0.005 0.029
(0.914) (0.698)
Size -0.088 -0.221
(0.113) (0.004)
Profitability 2.235 2.000
(0.000) (0.000)
Geographic Diver 0.150 0.347
(0.066) (0.009)
Leverage 0.000 -0.001
(0.726) (0.582)
Dividend 0.027 -0.081
(0.582) (0.246)
Industry Diver -0.029 0.027
(0.555) (0.675)
Investments -0.194 0.299
(0.474) (0.559)
Advertisement Exp
-0.144
(0.729)
The Tobin’s Q in both Pooled OLS regression are positively related with firm value, however
the result are not statistically significant due to the fact the P-value is bigger than 0.05. Thus,
the conclusion that firms using foreign currency have the higher value compared to the firms
without the foreign currency usage can’t be drawn. Among all the control variables, the
control variables of geographic diversification and of profitability are statistically significant in
these two situations, which imply that firms’ geographic diversification and profitability have
the big influence on firm value. The coefficient between geographic and diversification is
positive, which also support the result of Allayannis(2001), showing that firm’s expanded
operation outside the U.S. is a value-creative strategy for these firms. The coefficient of
profitability which is defined as the ratio of net income to total asset is also positive. This
result supports that higher profitable firms are traded with a higher premium compared with
the low profitable firms and is consistent with Allayannis(2001), Bartram(2003,2011) and Jin
and Jorion(2006). In the regression without omitting the advertisement expenditure, the size
displays the negative and statistically significant relationship with firm value, and this result is
consistent with that of Allayannis and Weston(2001) and carter, Roger, and Simkins (2003,
2006) and Bartram(2011) , which may indicate that larger firms can’t contribute to the higher
firm value by taking the advantage of economies of scale.
In my research, I also did the fixed effect regression to improve the quality of regression
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
30
result. In the fixed effect regression, the assumption that the unobserved factors are
unrelated with the control variable or explanatory variable is no longer needed. The table 6
below presents the result of fixed effect regression.
Table 6
The fixed-effect regression: the relationship between the foreign currency derivatives
usage and firm value
This table presents the result for fixed effect regression on the use of foreign currency derivative on
firm value. The missing data advertisement cost has big influence on the number of observations, but
previous literatures demonstrate that this variable has significant impact on firm value. Thus, the fixed
effect regression is done twice for these two situations, which are presented in column 1 and column
2 separately. The column 1 presents the result without the control variables of advertisement
expenditure. The column 2 presents the result of fixed effect regression with all control variables. For
every control variable, the result firstly shows the coefficient whose sign determines whether the
relationship is positive or negative, and below the coefficient the P-value which determines whether
the result is statistically significant or not is presented. The Tobin’s Q, foreign currency derivative
dummy and the control variables have the same definition as the univariate analysis in the previous
part. The estimations are conducted by using the Stata econometric software.
The fixed effect regression also shows that the coefficient of foreign currency derivative and
firm value is positive, which means that the foreign currency derivative usage may increase
Fixed-effect
Ln(Tobin's Q) (1) (2)
Foreign currency dummy 0.044 0.145
(0.615) (0.122)
Size -0.386 -0.686
(0.003) (0.003)
Profitability 0.284 0.245
(0.144) (0.189)
Geographic Diver -0.08 -0.066
(0.572) (0.737)
Leverage 0.000 0.000
(0.968) (0.889)
Dividend -0.114 -0.209
(0.184) (0.028)
Industry Diver -0.263
(0.125)
Investments growth 0.667 2.056
(0.045) (0.000)
Advertisement Exp
-2.026
(0.000)
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
31
firm value. However, the P-value of foreign currency derivative is higher than 5%, which
demonstrates that the result is not statistically significant. Thus, the result that the usage of
foreign currency derivatives has a positive effect on firm value cannot be concluded through
the fixed effect regression. The firm size and investment growth show the statistically
significant relationship with firm value. The coefficient of investment growth is positive
which support that the firm value of a firm having much more investment opportunities will
have be higher compared with the one of a firm with limited set of investment opportunities.
Other control variables, beside dividend that is as proxy to getting access to financial market
and advertisement expenditure that is proxy to consumer goodwill, do not demonstrate the
statistically significant relationship with Tobin’s Q in the fixed effect regression model.
To sum up, I finished the multivariate analysis by employing two regression models that are
pooled OLS regression and fixed-effect regression model. Since the missing data of
advertisement expenditure has big influence on the sample size, but this control variable is
also a major one which also leads to impact on firm value, I did each regression two times.
Both Pooled OLS regression and Fixed-effect regression demonstrate that the foreign
currency derivative instruments at the fiscal year-end do not have significant relationship
with firm value. The estimation for firm size in both regressions is negative and statistically
significant, supporting the result of Allayannis(2001), Lang and Stulz(1994), Kapitsinas(2008)
and Bartram(2003, 2011). The result for investment growth in fixed-effect regression model
is also statistically significant and the coefficient is positive, which is consistent with the one
of Allayannis(2001) and Bartram(2011). Concerning to the other control variables, the
geographic diversification and profitability only show statistically significant result in the
pooled OLS regression, and both are positively related with firm value. This result is similar
with the result from Allayannis(2001) and Kapitsinas(2008).
5.5 Alternative control variable
In an attempt to eliminate the deviation coming from the definition of the parameters of the
investigated relationship between the foreign currency derivatives usage and firm value, I
repeated the initial regression, the pooled OLS regression and Fixed effect regression with
the ratio of capital expenditure to total asset as a proxy for investment growth and the ratio
of advertisement cost to total asset as a proxy for consumer goodwill, and the result will be
displayed in the table 7.
Table 7
The result of Pooled OLS regression and fixed effect regression of Alternative control
variable
This table presents the result for pooled OLS regression and the fixed effect regression on the use of
foreign currency derivative on firm value. The missing data advertisement expenditure has big effect
on the number of observations, but previous literatures demonstrate that this variable also has
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
32
influence on firm value. Thus, both regressions are done under two situations. The column 1 and
column 2 present the pooled OLS regression and fixed effect regression separately without the control
variable of advertisement cost. Column 3 and column 4 present result of both regressions with all the
control variables. For every control variable, the result firstly shows the coefficient whose sign
determines that the relationship is positive or negative, and below the coefficient the P-value which
determines the result is statistically significant or not is presented. The Tobin’s Q, foreign currency
derivative dummy and the control variables have the same definition as the univariate analysis in the
previous part. The estimations are conducted by using the Stata econometric software.
Multivariate Analysis
Pooled OLS Pooled OLS fixed effect fixed effect
Tobin's Q (1) (2) (3) (4)
FC derivative dummy 0.073 0.126 0.143 0.240
(0.386) (0.424) (0.403) (0.264)
Size -0.232 -0.32 -0.579 -1.421
(0.020) (0.034) (0.021) (0.012)
Profitability 4.098 3.522 0.525 0.455
(0.000) (0.000) (0.176) (0.296)
Geographic Diver 0.245 0.663 -0.002 -0.141
(0.103) (0.016) (0.993) (0.764)
Leverage -0.001 -0.001 -0.001 -0.001
(0.872) (0.855) (0.780) (0.501)
Dividend -0.003 -0.234 -0.183 -0.370
(0.972) (0.087) (0.278) (0.094)
Industry Diver -0.064 0.029 -0.371
(0.488) (0.816) (0.271)
Investments growth 0.804 3.616 3.324 5.861
(0.413) (0.044) (0.041) (0.013)
Advertisement Exp 3.183
1.090
(0.009)
(0.885)
In comparison with the result of my initial regression as presented in table 5 and table 6, the
Tobin’s Q in both repeated pooled OLS regression and fixed effect regression are positively
related with firm value, however the result are also not statistically significant due to the
high p-value which is bigger than 0.05. These results are consistent with result of my initial
regressions. Concerning the control variables, the statistically result of size (natural
logarithmic of total asset) and investment growth (Ratio of capital expenditure to total asset)
are similar with the initial regression on size (natural logarithmic of total asset) and
investment growth (Ratio of capital expenditure to sales). But, the coefficient of the size
proxy become more negative and more significant (P-value decreased from 0.02 to 0.003) in
the model of alternative control variable, however, the other control variables display no
substantial change.
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
33
To sum up, compared the Pooled OLS and Fixed effect regression model of alternative control
variable with the initial Pooled OLS and Fixed effect regression model, the conclusion that
the using of foreign currency derivative does not have a significant impact on firm value is
consistent. As respect to the control variables, the finding that firm size has negative effect
on firm value and the investment growth has positive effect on firm value is also compatible.
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
34
Chapter 6 Determinants of hedging
Since I have collected the data and information on the foreign currency derivatives of my
research sample consisting of 94 firms of Fortune 200 in U.S., I want to supplement my
empirical research on the foreign currency derivative by investigating the determinants of
firm’s decision of using the foreign currency derivatives.
Under the basic Modigliani Miller (MM) model with the absence of financial distress costs,
taxes, information costs, underinvestment problems, management incentives and capital
market imperfection, the hedging activities is unnecessary. In the real world, however, it is
impossible to get access to this perfect market, the demand for corporate hedging may be
derived by relaxing one or more of the MM perfect market assumption.
The same as the research on the effect of hedging activities on firm value, before the
accounting regulations on the derivatives information, most researches focus on the
theoretical discussion about the determinants of derivative usage. Some researchers conduct
the empirical analysis and collect the data by survey or questionnaire. For instance, Nance,
smith and Smithson(1993) obtain the data based on the questionnaire from 159 large U.S.
non-financial corporations and they find that corporations with the derivatives instruments
have more growth investment, larger size, fewer hedging substitutes and more convex tax
functions. Recently, amounts of literatures work on this research through the empirical
analysis, which is stimulated by the data availability of derivatives position of each company.
While, many empirical analysis are carried out to test the hypothesis put forward by the
theoretical prediction.
Mian(1996) utilize a large sample consisting of 3022 firms in year 1992 and obtain the data
from the annual reports. The result demonstrates that the association between hedging and
market-to-book value is negative, which supports that firms with less investment
opportunities are more likely to use the hedging instruments. The evidence in support the
hypothesis that reducing the taxes payment is a motivation for firms to use the derivatives
instrument is very weak. However, this research finds strong evidence to support that size
has a positive relation with hedging dummy and points out that the information and
transaction cost have more influence on the decision of hedging than the cost of raising
financial capital or the cost of financial distress problem, which supported the theoretical
hypothesis that hedging activities demonstrate the economies of scale.
The same as Mian(1996), Geczy, Minton and Schrand (1996) also study a large sample of 372
Fortune 500 non-financial firms in the U.S. to test the hedging motivations of firms. The
result demonstrates that corporations with tighter financial constraints, higher foreign
exchange rate risk, and economies of scale are more likely to employ the currency derivatives
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
35
to reduce the risk exposure.
Bartram, Brown and Fehle(2003) test the rationales for corporate hedging on an
international scale. The same as the other previous literatures, they also test the hypothesis
that are mostly derived from the existing theories describing that the incentives for
derivatives come from the financial distress cost, underinvestment problems, taxes and also
the management incentives. By using the sample of 9292 companies in the 48 countries, the
result of this research shows that financial distress and taxes have positive coefficient with
firm’s hedging activities. However, contrary to the prediction, this research provides mixed
support for the management incentives and underinvestment hypothesis.
In this part, I conducted the empirical analysis to test the determinants of decision of
hedging activities for the nonfinancial firms in the U.S. I employed the logistic regression to
investigate this issue. The outcome variable in the logistic regression is binary or
dichotomous and in my research the hedging dummy is the dependent variable which is
equal to 1 if firm use the foreign currency derivative at the fiscal end year and equal to 0 if
firm does not utilize the foreign currency derivative to hedge the foreign currency exposure.
The independent variables in this regression is the firm size(nature logarithmic of total book
asset), profitability(ratio of net income to total book asset), investment growth(ratio of the
capital expenditure to total asset), leverage(ratio of long term debt to the book shareholder’s
equity), dividend(dummy variable equals to 1 if firm pays the dividend and to 0 if firms does
not pay the dividend) and geographic diversification (ratio of foreign sales outside the U.S. to
total sales). The table 8 below presents the result the logistic regression.
Table 8
The determinants of the decision of using the foreign currency derivatives
The table below presents the result of logistic regression relating the probability of hedging to the
determinants of hedging. This regression is also based on the sample of 74 firms of Fortune 200 firms
in the U.S. from 2009 to 2011 which contributes to 282 observations. The dependent variable is
foreign currency dummy. The independent variables are size, profitability, geographic diversification,
leverage, dividend dummy and investment expenditure. The column 1 shows the coefficient and the
column 2 shows the P-value.
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
36
Logistic regression
(1) (2)
Hedge-dummy Coefficient P-value
Size -0.126 0.772
Profitability -3.502 0.079
Geographic diver 3.427 0.000
Leverage -0.007 0.429
Dividend -0.324 0.407
Investment -1.544 0.439
The result from the logistic regression demonstrates that the geographic diversification has a
strong positive impact on hedging, and the result is statistically significant at 5% level, which
supports that the foreign exchange risk plays an important role in firms’ decision of hedging
activities. The profitability has a negative impact on the firms’ decision of the using of foreign
currency derivative and the result is statistically significant at 10% level. The logistic
regression finds no evidence to support that firms with more investment opportunities are
more likely to use the foreign currency derivatives than non-hedgers. The data also does not
support the hypothesis that hedging is based on the financial restriction, since the dividend
does not show a statistically significant relationship with hedging dummy. The logistic
regression also demonstrates that the hedging activities do not exhibit the economies of
scale and firm size is not a major determinant to the decision of hedging activity for
non-financial firms.
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
37
Chapter 7 Discussion of the result
The research of Allayannis(2001) directly test the effect of foreign currency derivative on firm
value and find that firm value is 4.87% higher for U.S. firms which employ the foreign
currency derivative to reduce the foreign exchange rate exposure than firms which do not
employ hedging instrument. Allayannis(2001) also find the evidence that firms that begin a
hedging policy experience an increase in value above those firms that choose to remain
un-hedged and firms that quit hedging experience a decrease in value relative to those firms
that choose to remain hedged. Bartram also conducted a research concerning the
relationship between derivative usage and firm value separately in 2003 and 2011. By using a
huge sample(7279 firms and 6888 firms), Bartram (2003,2011) do not find a strong result
indicating that foreign currency derivatives is associated with higher firm value for both U.S.
and international non-financial firms. Bartam(2011) suggest that the effect of derivative
usage is associated with a decline in both total and systematic risk and the effect of
derivative on firm value is not statistically significant. Guay(1999) investigate a sample of 234
U.S. nonfinancial firms that began using derivatives in the early 1990s and find no significant
evidence for changes in systematic risk and firm value. To sum up, limited researches test the
effect of foreign currency derivative usage on firm value and the results are mixed. My
research result is consistent with the finding of Bartram (2003 and 2011) and Guay(1999).
There are some possible explanations to figure out the insignificant relationship between the
foreign currency derivative usage and firm value.
1. Both the Pooled OLS regression and the fixed effect regression cannot totally prevent the
unmeasured selection bias in the sample. It is possible that some unmeasured characteristics
(e.g. the characteristics of CEO or managers) would have to be quite economically significant
and have huge influence on firm value.
2. Although I carefully examine the annual report of each firm from 2009 to 2011, some
firms did not give clear report or evidence to demonstrate whether the firm uses the foreign
currency derivative or not. For example, some firms state that “we may use the foreign
currency derivatives or contract” to hedge the foreign currency exposure. Given this facts,
users appear to be misclassified as nonusers under some unclear conditions, the regression
result maybe suffered from this noise.
3. As Bartram (2011) pointed out, the value effects of derivative use are quite sensitive to
selection bias. Even small differences of sample construction, control variable definition and
estimating method may totally change the study result.
4. The industry effect and the regulation about the risk management in different industry
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
38
also may have influence on the estimating of the effect of foreign currency derivatives on
firm value. As Jin and Jorion(2006) point out, firms in certain industry may be more likely to
hedge, for example, if they are exposed to more readily identified, larger, or more easily
hedged types of risk15.
5. Getting access to the derivative market and setting up a good hedging program is a very
expensive activity, which may lead to a negative effect on firm value. It is possible that the
foreign currency derivative activities increase the firm value, however, the huge cost of
hedging activity outweighs this benefit to some extent.
6. Under some situations, it is possible that executives use derivatives to smooth earning
performance due to the accounting-based bonus compensation. In larger firms with
diversified segment operations or with geographically diverse operations, the divisional
managers may engage in hedging to smooth their divisional performance. Thus, under this
situation, the real relationship between the hedging activity and firm value becomes more
difficult to estimate.
7. Sometimes, firm can use the operational hedges to reduce risk. For instance, a
manufacturing firm with production and sales operations in foreign countries is exposure to
foreign exchange rate. However, this multinational corporation can use the revenue in
foreign currency to buy the raw material, pay the wages or repay the loan without exposure
to foreign exchange rate risk. This operational hedging is helpful to reduce the foreign
exchange rate risk and maybe has influence on firm value as well.
8. A limitation of this research is that the regression only test whether the using of foreign
currency derivative create a higher firm value or not but not test whether the firms with
higher Tobin’s Q have an incentive to hedge. Another limitation is that firms in some special
industry will have a higher firm value compared with other industry. In the research of
Allayannis and Weston (2001), they control this effect by the industry adjusted Q. However,
because of the lack of data, this effect is difficult to control in my research.
9. Another limitation of my research is that it did not investigate the issue of reverse
causality because of the lack of data. The usage of the currency derivatives may reduce the
risk exposure and has positive influence on firm value. However, if the firms with higher firm
value (Tobin’s Q) have more investment opportunities, then they have more incentive to
hedge the risk exposure. As Allayannis(2001) demonstrate higher values for firms that use
derivatives may simply reflect the fact that high-Q firms have an incentive to hedge, and not
that hedging cause higher values16.
15
Jin and Jorion(2006) 16
Allayannis(2001)
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
39
Chapter 8 Conclusion
The main goal of this research is to investigate whether hedging foreign exchange rate risk
with foreign currency derivative instrument creates firm value or not. I used a sample of 94
firms among Fortune 200 firms from 2009 to 2011 in the U.S. and manually collected and
exacted the information on the foreign currency derivative position in the annual report
which I got from the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC). In order to test the
influence of foreign currency derivative on firm value, a hedge dummy indicating whether or
not the firm has hedging activities is utilized. Tobin’s Q defined as the natural logarithmic of
the ratio of market value of the firms to the total asset is as a proxy for firm value. While,
other control variables consisting of firm size, profitability, access to financial market,
investment growth, industry diversification, geographic diversification, advertisement
expenditure are also used to control the influence on firm value. The relationship between
the hedge dummy and Tobin’s Q is tested by the Pooled OLS regression and Fixed effect
regression.
Descriptive statistics reveals that the Tobin’s Q ratio is higher for firms that engaging in the
foreign currency derivatives compared to the Tobin’s Q ratios for firms that do not have
active position in the hedging activities. The descriptive statistics also reveals that the
geographic diversification (foreign sales divided by total sale), size (the nature logarithmic of
total asset), advertisement expenditure (advertisement cost divided by sales), access to
financial market (equals to 1 if firm pay the dividend, equals to 0 if firm does not pay the
dividend) and industry diversification (equals to 1 if firm reports more than one operation
segment, and equals to 0 if firm focuses only on one segment) are higher for firms with
hedging activities compared to the same characteristics for non-hedging firms.
The univariate analysis revealed that the firm value of foreign currency derivative users is
larger compared to the firm value without foreign currency derivatives, however, the result is
not statistically significant. The industry diversification, advertisement expenditure, and
geographic diversification of hedging companies show higher result than the same firm
characteristic of non-hedging companies, and these positive coefficients are statistically
significant. While, other differences of the firm characteristic between the foreign exchange
rate hedgers and non-foreign exchange rate hedgers are not statistically significant.
The multivariate analysis makes it possible to include the quantity of hedged position into
the regression model. Furthermore, it is possible to include the control variables which also
have influence on firm value and can explain the variation in the dependent variable Tobin’s
Q. Additionally, the multivariate analysis can isolate the effect of foreign currency derivative
usage on firm value from the effect of other control variables on firm value. The main
conclusion can be drawn based on the multivariate analysis is that having a foreign currency
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
40
derivative does not have a significant impact on the firm value of my sample. The control
variable size is statistically significant in both regression and the coefficient is negative, which
supports the hypothesis that it is difficult for firms to increase the market value just by the
economies of scale. The profitability has a positive effect on firm value and the result is
statistically significant in the Pooled OLS regression. Concerning the investment growth, it is
positively associated with firm value, but the result is just significant in fixed-effect
regression.
The conclusion can be derived from my research is that the using of foreign currency
derivatives does not have significant impact on firm value. This is contrary to the result of
Allayannis and Weston (2001) which find that the hedgers have a 4.7% higher firm value
compared with the non-hedgers. But it is consistent with Weston (2001) and Carter, Rogers
and Simkins (2004) whose analysis results show that the derivative usage does not have a
significant impact on firm value.
In order to supplement my research, I also tested the determinants of the decision of
hedging. The geographic diversification (foreign exchange rate risk) and profitability have
significantly statistical relation with firm’s decision of using the foreign currency derivative
for the non-financial firms in the U.S.
In this research, I did not control the effect of industry influence on firm value and did not
investigate the reverse causality issue because of the lack of data. However, these limitations
will be covered in my future research.
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
41
Reference:
[1] Allayannis, George and Weston, James P (2001), “The Use of Foreign Currency
Derivatives and Firm Market Value,” Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 14, No. 1,
PP.243-76
[2] Antoniou, Antonios and Zhao, Huainan (2009), “Corporate debt issues and interest rate
risk management: Hedging or market timing?” Journal of Financial Markets, Vol. 12, No.
3, PP.500-520
[3] Alkeback, P. and Hagelin, N (1999), “Derivative Usage by Nonfinancial firms in Sweden
with an international comparison,” Vol. 10 , No. 2, PP.105
[4] Bartram, Sohnke M, Brown, Gregory W and Conrad, Jennifer(2011), “The Effects of
Derivatives on Firm Risk and Value,” Western Finance Association, Vol. 46, No. 4 ,
PP.967-1001
[5] Bartram, Sohnke M.; Brown, Gregory W.and Fehle, Frank R(2003), “International
Evidence on Financial Derivatives Usage.”
[6] Berkman, H., and Bradbury, M.E., (1996), “Empirical evidence on the corporate use of
derivatives,” Financial management, Vol.25, No.2, 5-13
[7] Booth, J.R., Smith, R.L., and Stolz, R.W., (1984), “The use of interest futures by financial
Institutions,” Journal of Bank Research, Vol. 15, 15-20
[8] Baltagi, B.,(1995), “Econometric analysis of panel data”, 2th Edition, New York
[9] Breeden, D., Viswanathan, S., (1998), “Why do firms hedge? An asymmetric information
Model, ” unpublished working paper, Fuqua School of Business, Duke University
[10] Carter, D.A., Rogers, D.A., and Simkins, B.J., (2006), “Does hedging affect firm value?
Evidence from the US airline industry,” Financial management, Vol. 35, No. 1, 53-86
[11] Carter, D.A., Simkins, B.J., (2004), “The market’s reaction to unexpected catastrophic
events”
[12] The case of airline stock returns and the September 11th attacks.” Quarterly review of
economics and finance,” Vol. 44, 539-558
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
42
[13] DeMarzo, P.M., and Duffie, D., (1995), “Corporate incentives for hedging and hedge
accounting,” The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 8, No. 3, 743-771
[14] Froot, K.A., Scharfstein D.S., and Stein J.C., (1993), “Risk management: coordinating
corporate investment and financing policies,” The Journal of Finance, Vol.48, 1629-58
[15] Francisco Perez-Gonzalez and Hayong yun (2011), “risk management and firm value
Evidence from the Whether Derivatives,” Francisco perez-Gonzalez standard University
and NBER
[16] Gay, G.D., and Nam, J., (1998), “The underinvestment problem and corporate
derivatives use,” Financial Management, Vol. 27, No. 4, 53-69
[17] Guay and Wayne R(1998), “The impact of derivatives on firm risk: An empirical
examination of new derivative users,” Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 26, No. 1
PP.319-351
[18] Guay, W. and Kothari, S.P. (2003), “How much do firms hedge with derivatives? Journal
of Financial Economics,” Vol. 70 ,No. 3, PP.423-461
[19] Graham, John R.and Rogers (2002), “Do Firms Hedge in Response to Tax Incentives?”
Journal of Finance, Vol.57, No.2, PP.815-839
[20] Graham, J.R., and Smith C.W., (1999), “Tax incentive to hedge,” The Journal of Finance,
Vol. 54,No. 6, 2241-2262
[21] Hall, B.H., (1987), “The Relationship between Firm Size and Firm Growth in the US
Manufacturing Sector,” Journal of Industrial Economics, Vol. 35, No. 4, 583-606
[22] Jin, Y, and Jorion, P., (2006), “Firm value and hedging: evidence from US oil and gas
producers,” The Journal of Finance, Vol. 61, No. 2, 893-919
[23] Kapotsinas and Spyridon(2008), “The impact of Derivatives usage on firm
value :evidence from Greece”.
[24] Modigliani, F., and M.H.Miller(1961), “Dividend Policy, Growth, and the Valuation of
Shares,” Journal of Business Vol. 34, PP.411
[25] Mayers, D., and, Smith, C., (1982), “On the corporate demand for insurance,” Journal of
Business, Vol. 55, 281-296
The Use of Foreign Currency Derivatives and Firm value In U.S. Tilburg University
43
[26] Myers, S.C., (1977), “Determinants of corporate borrowing,” Journal of Financial
Economics, Vol.5, 147-175
[27] Nance, D., Smith, C., and Smithson, C., (1993), “On the determinants of corporate
hedging,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 48, 267-284
[28] Nelson, James M.and Moffitt, Jacquelyn Sue (2005), “The impact of hedging on the
market value of equity,” Journal of Corporate Finance , Vol. 11, No. 5, PP.851-881
[29] Nelson, James M.and Moffitt, Jacquelyn Sue (2005), “The impact of hedging on the
market value of equity,” Journal of Corporate Finance , Vol. 11, No. 5, PP.851-881
[30] Randall Morck, Bernar Yeung (1991), “Why investors value multinationality,” Journal of
Business, Vol.64, 165-187
[31] Singh and Amrik (2009), “the interest rate exposure of lodging firm, International
journal of Hospitality Management,” Vol. 28, No. 11, PP.135-143
[32] Smith, C.W., and Stulz R.M., (1985), “The determinants of firms’ hedging policies,” The
Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 20, No. 4, 391-405
[33] Stulz, R.M., (1984), “Optimal hedging policies,” Journal of Financial an Quantitative
Analysis, Vol. 19, No. 2, 127-140
[34] Tufano and Peter (1996), “Who Manages Risk? An Empirical Examination of Risk
Management Practices in the Gold Mining Industry,” Journal of Finance, Vol. 51, No. 4,
PP.1097-1137
[35] Yaobo Jin and Philippe Jorion (2006), “Firm value and Hedging: Evidence From U.S. oil
and Gas producers,” the journal of finance, Vol.LXI, No.2
[36] Tobin, J., (1969), “A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory,” Journal of
Money Credit and Banking, Vol. 1, No. 1, 15-29
[37] David A. DUbofsky and Thomas W.Miller, “Valuation and Risk management,” ISBN13:
9780195114706