The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

24
Vann Priest Presented at the 2011 Summer Meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers and Rio Hondo College Fall 2011 FLEX Day The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

description

The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success. Vann Priest Presented at the 2011 Summer Meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers and Rio Hondo College Fall 2011 FLEX Day. Contingent Faculty. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Page 1: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Vann Priest

Presented at the 2011 Summer Meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers

and

Rio Hondo College Fall 2011 FLEX Day

Vann Priest

Presented at the 2011 Summer Meeting of the American Association of Physics Teachers

and

Rio Hondo College Fall 2011 FLEX Day

The Use of Contingent Facultyand the Effect on Student Success

The Use of Contingent Facultyand the Effect on Student Success

Page 2: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Contingent FacultyContingent Faculty

•Adjuncts, post docs, TAs, non-tenure-track faculty, clinical faculty, part-timers, lecturers, instructors, or non-senate faculty

• Insecure, unsupported positions with little job security and few protections for academic freedom

•Adjuncts, post docs, TAs, non-tenure-track faculty, clinical faculty, part-timers, lecturers, instructors, or non-senate faculty

• Insecure, unsupported positions with little job security and few protections for academic freedom

Page 3: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

AAUP PositionAAUP Position

•“While it recognizes that current patterns of faculty appointment depart substantially from the ideal, the Association affirms its 1980 and 1993 recommendations that no more than 15 percent of the total instruction within an institution, and no more than 25 percent of the total instruction within any department, should be provided by faculty with non-tenure-track appointments.

•“While it recognizes that current patterns of faculty appointment depart substantially from the ideal, the Association affirms its 1980 and 1993 recommendations that no more than 15 percent of the total instruction within an institution, and no more than 25 percent of the total instruction within any department, should be provided by faculty with non-tenure-track appointments.

Page 4: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

California Educational Code Section 87482.6

California Educational Code Section 87482.6

•“...the Legislature wishes to recognize and make efforts to address longstanding policy of the board of governors that at least 75 percent of the hours of credit instruction in the California Community Colleges, as a system, should be taught by full-time instructors. ”

•“...the Legislature wishes to recognize and make efforts to address longstanding policy of the board of governors that at least 75 percent of the hours of credit instruction in the California Community Colleges, as a system, should be taught by full-time instructors. ”

Page 5: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

IssuesIssues

• Inadequate compensation

•No benefits

•Lack of professional support

• Institutional priorities

•Weakening of academic freedom

•Effects on students

•www.aaup.com

• Inadequate compensation

•No benefits

•Lack of professional support

• Institutional priorities

•Weakening of academic freedom

•Effects on students

•www.aaup.com

Page 6: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

I’m just the messenger!I’m just the messenger!

Page 7: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Retention in STEM Courses at RHC

Retention in STEM Courses at RHC

•Retention

•Courses with FT Faculty Only: 62.0%

•Courses with PT Faculty Only: 62.4%

•Courses with FT Faculty with FT and PT Faculty in Labs: 61.5%

•Courses with PT Faculty with FT and PT Faculty in Labs: 61.0%

•Retention

•Courses with FT Faculty Only: 62.0%

•Courses with PT Faculty Only: 62.4%

•Courses with FT Faculty with FT and PT Faculty in Labs: 61.5%

•Courses with PT Faculty with FT and PT Faculty in Labs: 61.0%

Page 8: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Success in STEM Courses at RHC

Success in STEM Courses at RHC

•Success

•Courses with FT Faculty Only: 60.3%

•Courses with PT Faculty Only: 62.4%

•Courses with FT Faculty with FT and PT Faculty in Labs: 60.0%

•Courses with PT Faculty with FT and PT Faculty in Labs: 60.9%

•Success

•Courses with FT Faculty Only: 60.3%

•Courses with PT Faculty Only: 62.4%

•Courses with FT Faculty with FT and PT Faculty in Labs: 60.0%

•Courses with PT Faculty with FT and PT Faculty in Labs: 60.9%

Page 9: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Daniel JacobyDaniel Jacoby

•Effects of Part-Time Faculty Employment on Community College Graduation Rates.

•The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 77, No. 6 (Nov./Dec. 2006)

•“The main result from this study is that increases in the ratio of part-time faculty at community colleges have a highly significant and negative impact upon graduation rates.”

•Effects of Part-Time Faculty Employment on Community College Graduation Rates.

•The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 77, No. 6 (Nov./Dec. 2006)

•“The main result from this study is that increases in the ratio of part-time faculty at community colleges have a highly significant and negative impact upon graduation rates.”

Page 10: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Paul D. Umbach & Matthew R. Wawrzynski

Paul D. Umbach & Matthew R. Wawrzynski

•FACULTY DO MATTER: The Role of Faculty in Student Learning and Engagement

•Research in Higher Education, Vol. 46, No. 2 (Mar. 2005)

•“... first-year students are more likely to interact with faculty on campuses where those faculty offer greater academic challenges.”

•“ First-year students and seniors reported greater gains in personal social development, general education knowledge, and practical competencies on campuses where faculty members engaged them using active and collaborative learning exercises.”

•FACULTY DO MATTER: The Role of Faculty in Student Learning and Engagement

•Research in Higher Education, Vol. 46, No. 2 (Mar. 2005)

•“... first-year students are more likely to interact with faculty on campuses where those faculty offer greater academic challenges.”

•“ First-year students and seniors reported greater gains in personal social development, general education knowledge, and practical competencies on campuses where faculty members engaged them using active and collaborative learning exercises.”

Page 11: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Paul D. UmbachPaul D. Umbach

•How Effective Are They? Exploring the Impact of Contingent Faculty on Undergraduate Education

•The Review of Higher Education, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Winter 2007)

•“This study offers some compelling evidence to suggest that, compared with their tenured and tenure-track peers, contingent faculty, particularly part-time faculty, are underperforming in their delivery of undergraduate instruction. “

•“While this study identifies some deficiencies among contingent faculty, it is important not to lay the blame entirely on faculty in these appointments.”

•How Effective Are They? Exploring the Impact of Contingent Faculty on Undergraduate Education

•The Review of Higher Education, Vol. 30, No. 2 (Winter 2007)

•“This study offers some compelling evidence to suggest that, compared with their tenured and tenure-track peers, contingent faculty, particularly part-time faculty, are underperforming in their delivery of undergraduate instruction. “

•“While this study identifies some deficiencies among contingent faculty, it is important not to lay the blame entirely on faculty in these appointments.”

Page 12: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Paul D. UmbachPaul D. Umbach

• The effects of part-time faculty appointments on instructional techniques and commitment to teaching

•Paper Presented at the 33 Annual Conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Jacksonville, FL, November 5-8, 2008

•“Part-timers will exhibit lower levels of commitment to their institution and will exhibit lower levels of instructional performance.”

• The effects of part-time faculty appointments on instructional techniques and commitment to teaching

•Paper Presented at the 33 Annual Conference of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Jacksonville, FL, November 5-8, 2008

•“Part-timers will exhibit lower levels of commitment to their institution and will exhibit lower levels of instructional performance.”

Page 13: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Kevin M. Eagan, Jr.& Audrey J. JaegerKevin M. Eagan, Jr.& Audrey J. Jaeger

•Closing the Gate: Part-Time Faculty Instruction in Gatekeeper Courses and First Year Persistence

•New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 115 (Fall 2008)

•“Students appear to be significantly and negatively affected by having gatekeeper courses taught by part-time faculty.”

•Closing the Gate: Part-Time Faculty Instruction in Gatekeeper Courses and First Year Persistence

•New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 115 (Fall 2008)

•“Students appear to be significantly and negatively affected by having gatekeeper courses taught by part-time faculty.”

Page 14: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Kevin M. Eagan, Jr. & Audrey J. JaegerKevin M. Eagan, Jr. & Audrey J. Jaeger

•Unintended Consequences Examining the Effect of Part-Time Faculty Members on Associate’s Degree Completion

•Community College Review, Vol. 36, No. 3 (Jan. 2009)

•“Findings indicate that students experienced a significant yet modest negative effect from exposure to part-time faculty members on the probability of completing an associate’s degree.”

•Unintended Consequences Examining the Effect of Part-Time Faculty Members on Associate’s Degree Completion

•Community College Review, Vol. 36, No. 3 (Jan. 2009)

•“Findings indicate that students experienced a significant yet modest negative effect from exposure to part-time faculty members on the probability of completing an associate’s degree.”

Page 15: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Kevin M. Eagan, Jr. & Audrey J. JaegerKevin M. Eagan, Jr. & Audrey J. Jaeger

•Effects of Exposure to Part-time Faculty on Community College Transfer

•Research in Higher Education, Vol. 50, No. 2 (2009)

•“Findings suggest that students tend to be significantly less likely to transfer as their exposure to part-time faculty increases.”

•Effects of Exposure to Part-time Faculty on Community College Transfer

•Research in Higher Education, Vol. 50, No. 2 (2009)

•“Findings suggest that students tend to be significantly less likely to transfer as their exposure to part-time faculty increases.”

Page 16: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Andrea J. JaegerAndrea J. Jaeger

•Contingent Faculty and Student Outcomes

•Academe, Nov./Dec. 2008

•Contingent Faculty and Student Outcomes

•Academe, Nov./Dec. 2008

Page 17: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Thomas Bailey, et al.Thomas Bailey, et al.

•Community College Student Success: What Institutional Characteristics Make a Difference?

•Achieving the Dream [www.achievingthedream.org]

•“Students in colleges with more part-time faculty also have lower graduation rates.”

•Community College Student Success: What Institutional Characteristics Make a Difference?

•Achieving the Dream [www.achievingthedream.org]

•“Students in colleges with more part-time faculty also have lower graduation rates.”

Page 18: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Curtis V. SmithCurtis V. Smith

•The Impact of Part-Time Faculty on Student Retention: A Case Study in Higher Education

•Dissertation, University of Missouri – Kansas City (2010)

•“This study supports findings in the literature review and two previous statistical analyses that increasing exposure to part-time faculty has a negative impact on retention.”

•The Impact of Part-Time Faculty on Student Retention: A Case Study in Higher Education

•Dissertation, University of Missouri – Kansas City (2010)

•“This study supports findings in the literature review and two previous statistical analyses that increasing exposure to part-time faculty has a negative impact on retention.”

Page 19: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Roger G. Baldwin & Matthew R. Wawrzynski

Roger G. Baldwin & Matthew R. Wawrzynski

•Contingent Faculty as Teachers: What We Know; What We Need to Know

•American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 55, No 8 (Aug. 2011)

•“Findings indicate that the teaching practices of part-time contingent faculty differ in important ways from their other faculty colleagues.”

•Contingent Faculty as Teachers: What We Know; What We Need to Know

•American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 55, No 8 (Aug. 2011)

•“Findings indicate that the teaching practices of part-time contingent faculty differ in important ways from their other faculty colleagues.”

Page 20: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Davis JenkinsDavis Jenkins

•What Community College Management Practices Are Effective in Promoting Student Success? A Study of High- and Low-Impact Institutions

•Achieving the Dream [www.achievingthedream.org]

•“Community colleges would be more effective if they do the following: Provide support for faculty development focused on improving teaching.”

•What Community College Management Practices Are Effective in Promoting Student Success? A Study of High- and Low-Impact Institutions

•Achieving the Dream [www.achievingthedream.org]

•“Community colleges would be more effective if they do the following: Provide support for faculty development focused on improving teaching.”

Page 21: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Davis JenkinsDavis Jenkins

•Redesigning Community Colleges for Completion: Lessons from Research on High-Performance Organizations

•CCRC Working Paper No. 26, Assessment of Evidence Series. New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center. (2011)

•“Colleges should provide opportunities for adjunct faculty to collaborate with full-time faculty members on improving curricula and instructional quality in the fields they teach. ”

•Redesigning Community Colleges for Completion: Lessons from Research on High-Performance Organizations

•CCRC Working Paper No. 26, Assessment of Evidence Series. New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center. (2011)

•“Colleges should provide opportunities for adjunct faculty to collaborate with full-time faculty members on improving curricula and instructional quality in the fields they teach. ”

Page 22: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

What Can We Do at RHC?What Can We Do at RHC?

•Campus-wide forums

•A dialogue between FT and PT faculty facilitated by the Academic Senate and RHCFA

•A conversation among all campus constituencies

•Campus-wide forums

•A dialogue between FT and PT faculty facilitated by the Academic Senate and RHCFA

•A conversation among all campus constituencies

Page 23: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

AcknowledgmentsAcknowledgments

•Office of Institutional Research & PlanningHoward Kummerman – Dean of Institutional Research and PlanningAnnel Medina – Research Specialist

•Math & Science DivisionNanci Gralapp

•Staff Development Committee

•Office of Institutional Research & PlanningHoward Kummerman – Dean of Institutional Research and PlanningAnnel Medina – Research Specialist

•Math & Science DivisionNanci Gralapp

•Staff Development Committee

Page 24: The Use of Contingent Faculty and the Effect on Student Success

Slides Available atSlides Available at

•faculty.riohondo.edu/vpriest/links.html•faculty.riohondo.edu/vpriest/links.html