The Tribune TT 02 July 2014 Page 9
-
Upload
harman-sidhu -
Category
Documents
-
view
217 -
download
0
Transcript of The Tribune TT 02 July 2014 Page 9
-
8/10/2019 The Tribune TT 02 July 2014 Page 9
1/1
THE TRIBUNECHANDIGARH | WEDNESDAY | 2 JULY 2014 09OPED-SECURITY
Adarsh Sein Anand
THE Indian native States, of
which the State of Jammu and
Kashmir was one, were those
areas in the Indian subconti-
nent which were for internal purposes
outside the administrative, legislative
and judicial sphere of the British Indian
Government. Each such State had a
hereditary ruler, who, subject to the para-mountcy of the British Crown, exercised,
with some exceptions, unlimited power
over the States ruled by them. These
native States covered more than half the
area of the Indian subcontinent and were
referred to as Indian India. The other part
of India comprising the provinces and
certain other areas was referred to as
British India. The rulers of the native
States were sovereign, subject to the
paramountcy of the British Crown.
The aftermath of the Second World War
and the assumption of power by a Labour
Ministry in England brought about a
change in the British policy towards
India. The delegation popularly known as
Cabinet Mission arrived in India on
March 23, 1946. On May 25, 1946, the Cab-
inet Mission circulated a memorandum
dated May 12, 1946, in regard to the native
States. In this memorandum the Mission
affirmed that on the withdrawal of British
Government from India, the rights of theStates which flowed from their relation-
ship with the Crown would no longer be
possible to exist and the rights surren-
dered by the States to the paramount pow-
er would revert to the rulers of those
States when the two new dominions of
India and Pakistan are created.
The Cabinet Mission, however, advised
the rulers of the native States to enter
into negotiations with the successor gov-
ernment or governments and evolve a
scheme of the precise form of their rela-
tionship. On February 20, 1947, the
British Government announced that
independence would be granted to
British India. This was followed by anoth-
er statement on June 3, 1947, setting out
its plan for the transfer of power: His
Majestys Government wish to make it
clear that the decisions announced above
[about Partition] relate only to British
India and that their policy towards Indian
States contained in the Cabinet Mission
Memorandum of 12.5.1946, (Cmd. 6835)
remains unchanged.
Thus, it would be seen that on the
withdrawal of paramountcy, the prince-
ly States were to become independent.
Chamber of PrincesLord Mountbatten, as the Crown repre-
sentative, addressed the Chamber of
Princes on July 25, 1947. He advised the
princes and their representatives that
although legally they had become inde-
pendent, they should accede to one or the
other dominion. Lord Mountbatten told
the Chamber of Princes that accession of
the State to either of the dominions was
to be under the Cabinet Mission Memo-
randum of May 16, 1947, which contem-
plated surrender to the dominion of three
subjects, namely, defence, external
affairs and communications. Lord
Mountbatten also caused to be circulated
for discussion a Draft Instrument of
Accession, which explicitly provided forsurrender to the appropriate dominion
the power over the three specified sub-
jects and stated that the dominion would
have no authority over the internal auton-
omy of the State. A State could accede to
either dominion by executing an instru-
ment of accession signed by the ruler and
accepted by the Governor-General of the
dominion concerned. The decision
whether to accede or not and to which
dominion were in the exclusive right anddiscretion of the Ruler. In the Indian
dominion the accession was to be made
under Section 6 of the Government of
India Act, 1935, as adopted by Section 9 of
the Indian Independence Act, 1947.
Three optionsOn August 15, 1947, I ndia became inde-
pendent. In accordance with the Cabi-
net Mission plan of May 1946 following
the creation of the dominions of India
and Pakistan, Kashmir bordering on
both India and Pakistan had, like any
other native State, three alternatives,
viz., to assert com plete independence,
to accede to Pakistan or accede to India.
Power to take the decision vested exclu-
sively in the ruler according to the
British Governments declared policy.
Dawn, the Muslim Leagues official
organ, wrote on August 24, 1947, The
time has come to tell the Maharaja of
Kashmir that he must make his choice
and choose Pakistan. Should Kashmir
fail to join Pakistan, the gravest possi-
ble trouble would inevitably ensue.
This threat alarmed the Maharaja of
Kashmir. Looking at the upsurge in the
State, Sheikh Abdullah, who was in jail,
was released on September 29, 1947. On
October 20, 1947, a large column of sev-
eral thousand tribesmen armed with
bren guns, machine guns, mortars and
flame throwers attacked the frontiers of
the State of Jammu and Kashmir. Sri-
nagar trembled before the danger of the
tribesmens invasion.
The tribal invasion caused grave devas-
tation in the State. The indecision of
Maharaja Hari Singh gave place to deep-
seated alarm and concern for his person-
al safety. On October 25, 1947, the
Maharaja appointed Sheikh Abdullah as
the emergency administrator. The raiders
were fast approaching Srinagar, looting
whatever came their way. The State was
in imminent peril. Sheikh Abdullahadvised the Maharaja that if the State was
to be saved, he must accede to India and
ask for immediate military help. This
advice paved the way for accession of
Jammu & Kashmir to India. The Mahara-
ja also found no other alternative and
addressed a letter to Lord Mountbatten,
the Governor General of India, stating: I
have to inform your Excellency that a
grave emergency has arisen in my State
and request the immediate assistance ofyour Government. As your Excellency is
aware, the State of Jammu & Kashmir
has not acceded to either the dominion of
India or Pakistan. Geographically my
State is contiguous with both of them.
Besides, my State has a common bound-
ary with the Union of Soviet Socialist
Republic and with China. In their exter-
nal relations the dominions of India and
Pakistan cannot ignore this fact. I wanted
to take time to decide to which dominion
I should accede or whether it is not in the
best interest of both the dominions and
my State to stand independent, of course
with friendly relations with both.
After giving an account of the tribal
invasion, the letter continued: With the
conditions obtaining at present in my
State and the great emergency of the sit-
uation as it exists, I have no option but to
ask for help from the Indian dominion.
Naturally, they cannot send the help
asked for by me without my State acced-
ing to the dominion of India. I have
accordingly decided to do so and I attach
the Instrument of Accession for accept-
ance by your Government.
Attached to the letter was an Instrument
of Accession duly executed and signed by
the Ruler, Maharaja Hari Singh.
Lord Mountbatten, the Governor-Gen-
eral of India, indicated his acceptance in
the following words: I do hereby accept
this Instrument of Accession. Dated this
twenty-seventh day of October Ninteen
Hundred and Forty-Seven.
The execution of the Instrument of
Accession by the Maharaja and its accept-
ance by the Governor-General finally set-
tled the issue of accession of the State of
Jammu and Kashmir. It was similar to the
one executed by the rulers of other States.
Framing of the ConstitutionThe internal administration of the State
was being governed by the Jammu &
Kashmir Constitution Act, 1939. OnMarch 5, 1948, Sir Hari Singh issued a
proclamation inter alia stating: My
Council of Ministers shall take appropri-
ate steps, as soon as restoration of normal
conditions have been completed, to con-
vene a National Assembly based upon
adult suffrage, having due regard to the
principle that the number of representa-
tives from each voting area should, as far
as practicable, be proportionate to the
population of that area.The Constitution to be framed by the
National Assembly shall provide ade-
quate safeguards for the minorities and
contain appropriate provisions guaran-
teeing freedom of conscience, freedom
of speech and freedom of assembly.
The National Assembly shall, as soon
as the work of framing the new constitu-
tion is completed, submit it through the
Council of Ministers for my acceptance.
This proclamation was followed by yet
another proclamation of June 20, 1949,
issued by Maharaja Hari Singh:
Now, therefore, I hereby direct and
declare all powers and functions whether
legislative, executive or judicial which are
exercisable by me in relation to the State
and its government including in particu-
lar my right and prerogative of making
laws, of issuing proclamations, orders
and ordinances, or remitting, commuting
or reducing sentences and of pardoning
offenders, shall during the period of my
absence from the State be exercisable by
Yuvraj Karan Singh Bahadur.
Constituent AssemblyOn May 1, 1951, Yuvraj Karan Singh
issued a proclamation which inter alia
contained the following directions:A Constituent Assembly consisting of
representatives of the people, elected
on the basis of adult franchise, shall
be constituted forthwith for the pur-
poses of framing a Constitution for
the State of Jammu and Kashmir. The Vote at election shall be direct
and [by] secret ballot.
The Constitution Assembly was invested
with the authority to frame the Constitu-
tion for the State and to decide its future.
Today is our day of destiny. A day which
comes only once in the life of a nation
after centuries we have reached the har-
bour of our freedom which for the first
time in history will enable the people of
Jammu & Kashmir, whose duly electedrepresentatives are gathered here, to
shape the future of their country after
wise deliberation and mould their future
organs of the Government. No person and
no power can stand between them and the
fulfilment of this their historic task,
declared Sheikh Mohammed Abdullah in
his inaugural address to the Constituent
Assembly and added that the Assembly
shall give its reasoned conclusions
regarding accession.
The Constituent Assembly which was
convened on the basis of adult suffrage
comprising the representatives of the peo-
ple of the State and which represented the
people of the entire State in unequivocal
terms ratified the States accession to
India, through a well-considered resolu-
tion of the Constituent Assembly on Feb-
ruary 15, 1954. In the 12th session of theConstituent Assembly of Jammu & Kash-
mir held from September 29, 1956, to
November 19, 1956, the drafting commit-
tee on October 10, 1956, presented the
draft Constitution. After detailed discus-
sions the Constitution was approved and
adopted on November 17, 1956. Sections 1
to 8 and 158, which deal with the State ter-
ritory, permanent residents, and the rela-
tionship of the State with the Union of
India, came into force at once. The
remaining sections came into force on
January 26, 1957, referred to as the com-
mencement of the Constitution.
The Preamble to the Constitution of
Kashmir reads: We, the people of the
State of Jammu and Kashmir, having
solemnly resolved, in pursuance of the
accession of this State to India which took
place on the twenty-sixth day of October,
1947, to further define the existing rela-
tionship of the State with the Union of
India as an integral part thereof, and tosecure to ourselves JUSTICE, social, eco-
nomic and political;/ LIBERTY of thought,
expression, belief, faith and worship;/
EQUALITY of status and of opportunity;
and to promote among us all;/ FRATERNI-
TY assuring the dignity of the individual
and the unity of the Nation./ In our Con-
stituent Assembly this seventeenth day of
November, 1956, do hereby adopt, enact
and give to ourselves this constitution.
Self-determinationThe people of the State of Jammu &
Kashmir, thus, finally settled the contro-
versy regarding accession through the
Constituent Assembly comprising their
elected representatives. No one, not even
the worst critic, has ever doubted the rep-
resentative nature of the Constituent
Assembly. Self-determination is a one-
time slot the people of the State took a
final decision and, therefore, the question
of any further self-determination does
not arise either legally or morally.
The wishes of the people of J&K have
been duly ascertained through the duly
elected Constituent Assembly. The
States accession, therefore, cannot any
longer be questioned. The 1954 resolution
of the Constituent Assembly was followed
by incorporation of Section 3 in the Con-
stitution of Jammu and Kashmir which
reads: The State of Jammu and Kashmir
is and shall be an integral part of the
Union of India. The use of the expression
is and shall be is significant. It talks
both of the past and the future relation-
ship of the State with the Union of India.
This section is in affirmation and reitera-
tion of the desire of the people of the State
to be an integral part of India. It has been
put beyond the powers of the State Legis-
lature to amend by virtue of the mandate
of Section 147 of the Constitution. This
provision was apparently incorporated in
order to avoid and fissiparous tendencies
raising their ugly heads in the future.Thus, in conclusion, it can be said with-
out any reservation that the Accession of
Jammu and Kashmir State to India on
October 26, 1947, is legally sound, consti-
tutionally binding, irrevocable and final.
(To be continued tomorrow)
The writer is a former Chief Justice of India;
former Chairman, National Human Rights Commission;
and former Chief Justice of the J&K High Court.
Accession of J&K, a constitutional viewTHE TRIBUNE NATIONAL
SECURITY FORUM
The TribuneNational SecurityForum series onmatters ofnational interestexamines thecontroversy overthe accession ofthe State ofJammu andKashmir to Indiaand Article 370.The first in a two-part analysis bya former ChiefJustice of Indialooks at thecircumstancesand processes
that led to theaccession.
IrrevocableaccessionThe execution of the
Instrument of Accessionby the Maharaja and itsacceptance by theGovernor-General finallysettled the issue ofaccession of the State ofJammu and Kashmir.
The ConstitutionAssembly was investedwith the authority to
frame the Constitutionfor the State and to
decide its future.
Self-determination is aone-time slot thepeople of the State tooka final decision and,therefore, the questionof any further self-determination doesnot arise either legallyor morally.
A file photo of a demonstration in favour of Article 370 in Srinagar. PTI
ACROSS1 Certificate of qualification
(7)4 Striking outfit (3-2)7 Shallow river crossing (4)8 Extraordinary (8)10 A diversionary tactic (3,7)12 Firearm (6)13 Easily influenced (6)
15 Disreputable member ofgroup (5,5)
18 Obsolete (8)19 Area for skating (4)20 Without (5)21 Utterly destroy (7)
DOWN1 Pos tpon e (5)2 State of bliss (8)3 Reddish-brown hair
colour (6)4 Unfounded (10)
5 Large heavy book (4)6 Withdraw from
undertaking (4,3)9 US city famed for jazz
(3,7)11 Superficial renovation (8)12 Carry out (7)14 Admittance (6)16 Card game for gamblers
(5)17 Knock senseless (4)
Yesterdays solution calendarJULY 2, 2014, WEDNESDAY
Shri Vikrami Samvat 2071 Shaka Samvat 1936 (Aashaadh
Shaka 11) Aashaadh Parviste 18Hijari 1435 Shukla Paksha tithi 5, up to
12.49 am Sidhi yoga up to 12.26 amMagha Nakshatra up to 5.53 pm
Moon in Leo signGandamula up to 5.53 pm.
lahore,thursday,july 2,1914
The Punjab companiesIN another column we have reproduced Mr. Langley's report on
the Joint Stock Companies in the Punjab for 1913-14. The finan-
cial crisis was directly and indirectly responsible for the collapse
of a large number of companies. In March 1914 only 108 of the reg-istered companies remained out of 155 which were s hown to exist
in March 1913. Twenty-two new companies were started during
the year but ten of them collapsed during the storm. Of the com-
panies that failed 21 were banks, the paid up Capital of which
amounted to Rs. 25 lakhs and their deposits to about Rs. 2 crores.
A large proportion of these was paid out before the banks actual-
ly closed, and some part, Mr. Langley thinks, was "undoubtedly
bogus." He deducts one-half of the total deposits and considers
that the amount for which the banks are accountable still remains
a very large sum.
Private candidates and university examinationsRULE 2 of the Regulations relating to private candidates in the
Punjab University provides that bona fide teachers, not being stu-
dents of any college affiliated to the University, may be recom-
mended by the Syndicate for admission by special order of the
Senate as candidates "at any University Examination in the facul-
ties of Oriental Learning and Arts other than an examination for
Matriculation." In an explanatory note it is stated that the term
bona fide teacher is held to include the Librarians of affiliated col-
leges and the University Library. Why other Libraries in the Pun-
jab were not included we cannot say; but nothing need be said
about it as the restriction has since been removed.
YESTERDAYSSOLUTION
Across1 Blue-blooded, 9 Ill-used, 10 Crawl, 11Kick, 12 Despotic, 14Exceed, 16 Pencil, 18Panorama, 19 Opus,22 Noose, 23 Ascribe,24 Greenkeeper.
Down2 Lilac, 3 Else, 4Ledger, 5 Occupied, 6Elastic, 7 Tickled pink,8 Blacklisted, 13Retrieve, 15 Candour,17 Embark, 20 Poise,21 Acme.
quick crossword su do ku forecaston this day...100 years ago
2 7 8 1 6 3 4 9 5
1 3 4 5 2 9 6 8 7
6 9 5 8 4 7 2 1 3
7 1 9 4 8 5 3 6 2
8 2 6 3 7 1 5 4 9
5 4 3 6 9 2 8 7 1
9 6 1 2 3 8 7 5 4
4 5 2 7 1 6 9 3 8
3 8 7 9 5 4 1 2 6
4 2 7 3
8 1
3 4 1 6
4 2
1 6
9 1
2 3 6 4
9 6
6 7 2 5
Sunny Partly Cloudy Cloudy Rainy
CITY MAX MIN
Chandigarh 36 27
New Delhi 36 29PUNJAB
Amritsar 34 22Bathinda 34 24
Jalandhar 35 25
Ludhiana 35 24
Patiala 35 24HARYANA
Ambala 34 22
Bhiwani 35 26
Hisar 35 25
Karnal 33 22
Sirsa 34 24HIMACHAL PRADESH
Dharamsala 27 20
Manali 22 12
Nahan 28 15
Shimla 22 13
Solan 26 19JAMMU & KASHMIR
Jammu 34 23
Leh 29 18
Srinagar 30 17
UTTARAKHAND
Dehradun 32 23
Mussoorie 25 17Nainital 23 16
SUNSET: WEDNESDAY 7.30 PM
SUNRISE: THURSDAY 5.24 AM
TEMPERATUREIN OC