The Tent Mountain Minemontem-resources.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2020-04...2020/04/07 · COAL...

COAL RESOURCES FOR THE

The Tent Mountain Mine

ALBERTA AND BRITISH COLUMBIA,

CANADA Competent Person’s Report

Prepared for Montem Resources Alberta Operations Ltd.

Alberta Coal Leases: 013 1306080819, 013 1306080820, 013 1306080821, 013 1306080822, 013

1305090663, 013 1305090664, 013 1305090665, 013 1305090666, 013 1305090667, 013

1305090668, 013 1305100739; BC Coal Lease CL389283; Plus Freehold Tenements

Issue Date: April 7, 2020

Effective Date: February 20, 2020

Prepared By:

DAHROUGE GEOLOGICAL CONSULTING LTD. SUITE 103, 10183 112 STREET, EDMONTON, ALBERTA T5K 1M1

T 780-434-9808 | F 780-439-9789 | WWW.DAHROUGE.COM

Prepared and Signed By:

Bradley Ulry, P.Geo., Dahrouge Geological Consulting Ltd.

John Gorham, P.Geol., Dahrouge Geological Consulting Ltd.

Matthew Carter, P.Geo., Dahrouge Geological Consulting Ltd.

JORC Report Montem Resources

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1 Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 9

1.1 Project Description .............................................................................................................................. 9

1.2 Land Tenure ........................................................................................................................................... 9

1.3 Geology and Mineralization ............................................................................................................. 9

1.4 Exploration .......................................................................................................................................... 10

1.5 Development and Operations ...................................................................................................... 10

1.6 Mineral Resource Estimate ........................................................................................................... 10

1.7 Conclusions and Recommendations ......................................................................................... 12

2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 15

3 Reliance on Other Experts ......................................................................................................................... 17

4 Property Description and Location ....................................................................................................... 19

4.1 Location ................................................................................................................................................ 19

4.2 Mineral Tenure .................................................................................................................................. 19

4.3 Tent Mountain Mineral Tenures ................................................................................................. 20

4.4 The Tent Mountain Mine Purchase Agreement .................................................................... 23

4.5 Permits, Approvals & Agreements ............................................................................................. 23

4.6 Coal Development Policy For Alberta ....................................................................................... 24

4.7 Indigenous Peoples Consultation ............................................................................................... 25

4.8 Environmental Liabilities .............................................................................................................. 27

4.9 Other Significant Factors and Risks .......................................................................................... 27

5 Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure, and Physiography ......................... 28

5.1 Topography, Elevation, and Vegetation ................................................................................... 28

5.2 Infrastructure and Local Resources .......................................................................................... 28

5.3 Climate ................................................................................................................................................... 28

6 History ............................................................................................................................................................... 29

6.1 Historical Mine Grid and Coordinate Systems ...................................................................... 30

6.2 Topography ......................................................................................................................................... 30

6.3 Historical Drilling .............................................................................................................................. 30


6.4 Historical Trenching and Adits ................................................................................................... 33

6.5 Underground Mining ....................................................................................................................... 33

6.6 Open Pit Mining ................................................................................................................................. 33

6.7 Historical Mineral Resources....................................................................................................... 35

6.7.1 2005 Norwest Corp. Resource Estimate ............................................................................ 35

6.7.2 2017 Geoff Jordan Associates Corp. Resource Estimate .............................................. 35

6.7.3 2018 Tamplin Resources Pty Ltd. Resource Estimate.................................................. 35

7 Geological Setting and Mineralization ................................................................................................. 37

7.1 Regional Geology .............................................................................................................................. 37

7.2 Structural Geology............................................................................................................................ 38

7.2.1 Regional Fault Structures ......................................................................................................... 38

7.2.2 Regional Fold Structures .......................................................................................................... 39

7.3 Property Geology .............................................................................................................................. 41

8 Exploration ...................................................................................................................................................... 45

8.1 Geological and Structural Mapping ........................................................................................... 45

8.2 Roadcut and Drone Measured Sections................................................................................... 47

8.3 Topography ......................................................................................................................................... 48

8.4 Aerial Drone Survey ........................................................................................................................ 48

8.5 Lake Bathymetry Survey ............................................................................................................... 49

9 Drilling ............................................................................................................................................................... 50

9.1 Air Rotary Drilling (“RAB”) ........................................................................................................... 53

9.2 Reverse Circulation Drilling ......................................................................................................... 53

9.3 6” Large Diameter Core Drilling (‘LDC’) .................................................................................. 54

9.4 HQ Diamond Drilling ....................................................................................................................... 56

9.4.1 2018 HQ Geotechnical and Geochemical Sampling Program .................................... 56

9.4.2 2019 HQ Geotechnical, Hydrogeological and Geochemical Program .................... 57

9.5 Collar Surveys .................................................................................................................................... 58

9.6 Downhole Surveys ........................................................................................................................... 58

9.6.1 Fracture and Bedding Orientation Measurements – Dipmeter ................................ 58


9.6.2 Acoustic Televiewer (“ATV”) Surveys ................................................................................. 59

9.6.3 Optical Televiewer (“OTV”) Surveys .................................................................................... 59

9.6.4 Full Wave Sonic (“Sonic”) Survey .......................................................................................... 59

9.7 Monitoring Well Installation & Vibrating Wire Piezometer Installation ................... 59

9.8 Surficial Soil Geotechnical Drilling and Test Pitting Program ........................................ 59

9.8.1 Surficial Soil Geotechnical Test Pits ..................................................................................... 60

9.8.2 Surficial Soil Geotechnical Drilling ........................................................................................ 60

9.9 Exploration Summary ..................................................................................................................... 61

10 Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security....................................................................................... 63

10.1 Pre-analysis Sample Preparation and Quality Control ................................................. 63

10.2 Laboratory Sample Preparation ............................................................................................ 68

10.3 Quality Control and Quality Assurance ............................................................................... 71

11 Data Verification ............................................................................................................................................ 72

12 Coal Quality ...................................................................................................................................................... 74

12.1 Raw Coal Quality .......................................................................................................................... 74

12.2 Clean Coal Quality ........................................................................................................................ 75

13 Mineral Resource Estimates ..................................................................................................................... 81

13.1 Resource Database ...................................................................................................................... 81

13.2 Geological Model .......................................................................................................................... 82

13.3 Resource Summary ..................................................................................................................... 90

13.3.1 Resource Classification .............................................................................................................. 90

13.3.2 Density and Ash Grid Modelling............................................................................................. 97

13.3.3 Resource Estimation Procedure ............................................................................................ 99

13.4 Resource Statement ................................................................................................................. 101

13.5 Resource Comparison ............................................................................................................. 112

14 Adjacent Properties ................................................................................................................................... 113

15 Interpretation and Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 116

16 Recommendations ..................................................................................................................................... 117

17 References ..................................................................................................................................................... 119


Competent Persons Statements ............................................................................................................................. 1

JORC Code (2012) Table 1– Reporting of Exploration Results & Mineral Resources ..................... 2

Appendix 1 ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 2-1 The Tent Mountain Mine Location ....................................................................................... 16

Figure 4-1 Tent Mountain Tenure Map ..................................................................................................... 22

Figure 4-2 Property Restrictions and Mine Permit ............................................................................. 26

Figure 6-1 Tent Mountain Historical Drillhole Locations ................................................................. 32

Figure 6-2 Tent Mountain Historical Mine Workings ......................................................................... 34

Figure 7-1 Stratigraphic Column (Modified from Richardson et al., 1992) ............................... 37

Figure 7-2 Regional Geology Map ............................................................................................................... 40

Figure 7-3 Tent Mountain Geology ............................................................................................................. 43

Figure 7-4 Tent Mountain Stratigraphic Column (Modified from Richardson et al., 1992) 44

Figure 8-1 Example Digitized Cross-Section Series, 1982 Coleman Collieries ......................... 46

Figure 8-2 Example Digitization of Cross-Section 1380 from 1982 Coleman Collieries ...... 46

Figure 9-1 2018 & 2019 Tent Mountain Drillhole Locations ........................................................... 51

Figure 10-1 Graphic Log of Coal Seam S2 from TM19-028LDC and TM19-29LDC ................... 65

Figure 10-2 Graphic Log of Coal Seam S4 from TM19-040LDC and TM19-050LDC ................ 66



Figure 10-5 Graphic Log of Coal Seam S7 from TM19-027LDC......................................................... 67

Figure 12-1 Tent Mountain Ash Yield Curves by Seam (Source A&B Mylec) .............................. 77

Figure 13-1 Historical Cross-Section in LeapfrogTM ............................................................................... 82

Figure 13-2 Solid modelling of Historical Workings .............................................................................. 84

Figure 13-3 Cross-section Location Map .................................................................................................... 85

Figure 13-4 South Looking Geological Cross-Section Lines +2400 to +1600 .............................. 86

Figure 13-5 South Looking Geological Cross-Section Lines +1200 to +0400 .............................. 87

Figure 13-6 South Looking Geological Cross-section Lines -0400 to -1200 ................................ 88

Figure 13-7 South Looking Geological Cross-section Lines -1600 to -2400 ................................ 89

Figure 13-8 Resource Classification Plan Map – Seam S6.................................................................... 92

Figure 13-9 Resource Classification Plan Map – Seam S5.................................................................... 93

Figure 13-10 Resource Classification Plan Map – Seam S4 ............................................................... 94




Figure 13-13 Ash vs Density Correlation for Tent Mountain ........................................................... 98

Figure 13-14 Seam 7 Cumulative Strip Ratios ..................................................................................... 107

Figure 13-15 Seam 6 Cumulative Strip Ratio ....................................................................................... 108

Figure 13-16 Seam 5 Cumulative Strip Ratios ..................................................................................... 109



Figure 14-1 Adjacent Properties Map........................................................................................................ 115

LIST OF TABLES

Table 1-1 In-Place Coal Resource Summary (kilotonnes) .................................................................... 11

Table 4-1 Montem Resources Tent Mountain Mine Alberta Coal Leases ....................................... 20

Table 4-2 Montem Resources Tent Mountain Mine BC Coal Lease .................................................. 21

Table 4-3 Montem Resources Tent Mountain Mine Alberta Freehold (all minerals except

gold and silver) Tenements ................................................................................................................................. 21

Table 4-4 Montem Resources Tent Mountain Mine Alberta Freehold (surface only)

Tenements .................................................................................................................................................................. 21

Table 4-5 Tent Mountain Permits and Approvals .................................................................................... 24

Table 6-1 Lidar Survey Acquisition Parameters ....................................................................................... 30

Table 6-2 Historical Drillhole Summary for the Tent Mountain Mine............................................. 31

Table 6-3 Pit Summary for the Tent Mountain Mine .............................................................................. 33

Table 6-4 In-Situ Coal Resource Estimate by Norwest Corp. (2005) ............................................... 35

Table 6-5 In-Situ Coal Resource Estimate by Geoff Jordan and Associates Corp. (2017) ....... 35

Table 6-6 In-Situ Coal Resource Estimate by Tamplin Resources Pty Ltd. (2018) .................... 36

Table 7-1 Average Coal Seam Thickness at Tent Mountain ................................................................. 42

Table 8-1 Compilation Summary of Geological Control Points .......................................................... 47

Table 8-2 2019 Roadcut Measured Sections .............................................................................................. 47

Table 8-3 2019 Aerial Drone Imagery Measured Section Locations (UTM NAD83) ................. 48

Table 9-1 2018 and 2019 Drillhole Summary ........................................................................................... 50

Table 9-2 2018 and 2019 Drillholes .............................................................................................................. 52

Table 9-3 2018 and 2019 Large Diameter Core Coal Sample Summary ........................................ 55

Table 9-4 2018 HQ Core Geochemical and Geotechnical Samples .................................................... 57

Table 9-5 2019 HQ Geotechnical, Geochemical and Hydrogeological Program Summary ..... 58

Table 9-6 2019 Test Pit Locations .................................................................................................................. 60


Table 9-7 2019 Drillhole Locations ............................................................................................................... 61

Table 9-8 2019 Potential Mine Dump Monitoring Well Locations and Water Levels .............. 61

Table 9-9 Summary of Drillhole Coal Intersections ................................................................................ 62

Table 9-10 Drillhole Coal Intersections ..................................................................................................... 62

Table 10-1 2019 Coal Sample Shipment Details .................................................................................... 65

Table 11-1 2019 Drillhole Reliability Classification Summary ........................................................ 72

Table 11-2 2019 Modelled Drillholes ......................................................................................................... 73

Table 11-3 2019 Excluded Drillholes ......................................................................................................... 73

Table 12-1 Raw Coal Quality Grid Data ..................................................................................................... 75

Table 12-2 Weighted Average Raw Coal Quality Properties by Seam - adb ............................... 75

Table 12-3 Tent Mountain Washability Database (Source A&B Mylec)....................................... 75

Table 12-4 Tent Mountain Clean Coal Composite Results ................................................................. 78

Table 12-5 2018 and 2019 Mineral Analysis of Ash ............................................................................. 79

Table 12-6 2018 and 2019 Core Petrographic Analysis – Reactive Components .................... 80

Table 12-7 2018 and 2019 Core Petrographic Analysis – Inert Components ........................... 80

Table 13-1 Generalized Resource Classification Categories Guide (Hughes et al., 1989) .... 90

Table 13-2 HARP Block Model Ash (In-Situ) Grid Statistics ............................................................. 98

Table 13-3 HARP Block Model Relative Density (In-Situ) Statistics .............................................. 99

Table 13-4 Resource Reporting Criteria ................................................................................................. 101

Table 13-5 In-Place Coal Resources Summary by Province (kilotonnes), Reported as of

February 20, 2020 .................................................................................................................................................. 101

Table 13-6 In-Place Coal Resources Summary for Alberta by Coal Seam and Measured

Resource Classification (kilotonnes), reported as of February 20, 2020 ........................................ 102

Table 13-7 In-Place Coal Resources Summary for Alberta by Coal Seam and Indicated


Table 13-8 In-Place Coal Resources Summary for BC by Coal Seam and Indicated Resource

Classification (kilotonnes), reported as of February 20, 2020 ............................................................ 104

Table 13-9 In-Place Coal Resources Summary for Alberta by Coal Seam and Inferred


Table 13-10 In-Place Coal Resources Summary for BC by Coal Seam and Inferred Resource

Classification (kilotonnes), reported as of February 20, 2020 ............................................................ 106

Table 13-11 Comparison of Recent Tent Mountain Resource Estimates ..................................... 112

Table 14-1 Adjacent Coal Projects ............................................................................................................. 113


LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

Abbreviation Definition Abbreviation Definition

Micron kph kilometres per hour °C degrees Celsius km2 square kilometre °F degree Fahrenheit Kt Kilotonne g Microgram kVA kilovolt-amperes A Ampere kW kilowatt A Annum kWh kilowatt-hour Bbl

Barrels L Liter Bcm bank cubic metre L/s litres per second BC British Columbia LOM life of mine Btu British thermal units m metre C$ Canadian dollars M mega (million) Cal Calorie m2 square metre Cfm cubic feet per minute m3 cubic metre Cm Centimetre Ma million years cm2 square centimetre MASL metres above sea level Cps counts per second Mbcm million bank cubic metres D

day

min minute ddpm dial divisions per minute mm millimetre dia. diameter mph

miles per hour

Dlt dry long ton MVA megavolt-amperes Dmt dry metric tonne MW megawatt Dst dry short ton MWh megawatt-hour Dwt dead-weight ton m3/h cubic metres per hour FSI free swelling index opt, oz/st ounce per short ton Ft Foot oz Troy ounce (31.1035g) ft/s foot per second oz/dmt ounce per dry metric tonne ft2 square foot pop population ft3 cubic foot ppb part per billion g Gram ppm part per million G giga (billion) QA quality assurance Gal Imperial gallon QC quality control g/L gram per litre RL relative elevation g/t gram per tonne RoMax Maximum reflectance Gpm Imperial gallons per minute ROM run of mine gr/ft3 grain per cubic foot s second gr/m3 grain per cubic metre st short ton Hr Hour stpa

stpd

t

tpa

tpd

tpa

tpd

US$

USg

USgpm

V

short ton per year

short ton per day

metric tonne

metric tonne per year

metric tonne per day

metric tonne per year

metric tonne per day

United States dollar

United States gallon

US gallon per minute

Volt

Ha Hectare t

tpa

tonne

metric tonne per year Hp Horsepower In Inch tpd metric tonne per day in2 square inch US$ United States dollar J Joule USgpm

V

US gallon per minute

Volt K kilo (thousand)

Kcal Kilocalorie W Watt Kg Kilogram wmt wet metric tonne KJ/kg kilojoules per kilogram yd3 cubic yard Km Kilometre yr year


1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Montem Resources Alberta Operations Ltd. (“Montem”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Montem

Resources Ltd., is a coal exploration and mine development company which currently holds the coal

rights and a portion of the surface rights to the Tent Mountain Mine (“Tent Mountain” or “the Project” or

“the Property”)which is located within the Crowsnest Pass region of southwest Alberta and southeast BC.

This report has been completed in accordance JORC Code (2012) and meet the 2014 Australian

guidelines for estimation and classification of coal resources. It summarizes recent and historical coal

exploration at Tent Mountain and presents a resource estimate based on Montem’s 2018 and 2019

exploration programs, as well as historical drilling, trenching and adits.

1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION

The centre of the Property is located at 49°34'20"N, 114°42'20"W, approximately 16 km southwest of

Coleman in the Crowsnest Pass, Alberta, Canada (Figure 2-1). The city of Calgary is located approximately

250 road kilometers to the northeast. The Project straddles the Alberta-BC provincial border and is

accessed via a historical mine haul road which intersects the Crowsnest Highway (Highway 3). The

Project is 6 km south of the main rail line operated by Canadian Pacific Railway, providing potential

access to coal export terminals in Vancouver and north at Ridley Terminals in Prince Rupert. The Project

is 2 km from the Coal Mountain Rail Spur in BC; owned by Teck Resources Ltd.

1.2 LAND TENURE

The Project is made up of 11 Alberta Coal Leases (Table 4-1; Figure 4-1), 10 Alberta Freehold (all

minerals except gold and silver) Tenements (Table 4-3; Figure 4-1) and one BC Coal Lease (Table 4-2;

Figure 4-1) that cover an area of approximately 1683.1 ha. In addition Montem holds five Alberta

Freehold (surface only) Tenements (Table 4-5; Figure 4-1). Four of these Alberta Freehold (surface only)

Tenements overlap Alberta Coal Leases owned by Montem and one of these Alberta Freehold (surface

only) Tenements is northeast of the main Project area covering a portion of the access road. A small area,

4.6 ha, of one of Montem’s Alberta Freehold (all minerals except gold and silver) Tenement falls within

the South Saskatchewan Regional Plan, designed to minimize the amount of land used for new

developments and to implement progressive reclamation in areas no longer being used. The Alberta

portion of the Project falls within the Mountain Goat and Bighorn Sheep Range, the Grizzly Bear Habitat

Protection Zone and the Rocky Mountain Forest Reserve.

The Project has an active Coal Exploration Permit (CEP 180001) and granted Mine Permits for both

Alberta and BC (C85-16G and BC C-108, respectively) as well as a granted Environmental Protection and

Enhancement Act approval (EPEA 47679-02-00). The current EPEA approval does not allow mining at

Tent Mountain and will require an amendment before re-commencement of mining operations. Montem

has entered into two road use agreements to facilitate access to the Project, one in Alberta with a local

coniferous timber licence holder, 770538 Alberta Ltd., and the other in BC with CanWel Building

Materials Group Ltd.

1.3 GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION

The Project is situated within the Lewis Thrust Sheet (Smith, 1982) of the Rocky Mountain Front Ranges

in southwestern Alberta and southeastern BC. Regionally the area is bound by the north Livingston

Thrust in the east and the Erickson Fault in the west. Stratigraphy of the area is characterized by

Precambrian to Upper Cretaceous rocks of the Fernie Group, Kootenay Group, Spray River Group,


Etherington Formation, Rocky Mountain Group and Mount Head Formation (Figure 7-1; Figure 7-3).

Economic coal potential in the Front Ranges lies in the Mist Mountain Formation of the Kootenay Group.

Stratigraphy in the area of the Project was subject to extensive folding and faulting during the Late

Cretaceous Laramide Orogeny. The major thrust faults that developed are the Ptolemy Thrust, Tent

Thrust, Boulton Thrust and Crowsnest Thrust; all with a general dip to the west. This major faulting and

folding have affected coal seam thickness, lateral continuity, geometry and quality. The structural geology

at Tent Mountain is challenging with the faulting and folding dividing the deposit into a number of

discrete structural domains of varying styles and complexities.

The principal coal seams at Tent Mountain in descending order are, seam S7, S6 (S6U, S6M, and S6L), S5

(S5U, S5M, and S5L), S4 (S4U, S4M, and S4L), S3 (S3U and S3L) and S2 (S2U and S2L). All seams, except

for S7 have been correlated and modelled on a coal seam ply basis. Seam thickness is variable and

dependant on post-depositional structural modification. Generally, structural thickenings of coal seams

occur around the hinge of folds, whereas elsewhere coal seam thinning may occur (Figure 7-4).

1.4 EXPLORATION

Exploration at Tent Mountain began in the early 1900’s. Between 1949 and 1977 Coleman Collieries Ltd.

conducted numerous exploration programs at Tent Mountain, although information and data from the

programs prior to 1973 is limited. In addition to drilling, these exploration programs included 3 adits, 40

trenches, and several detailed geological mapping campaigns carried out by contracted geological

consultants.

Between the winter of 2018 and autumn of 2019, Montem completed 76 resource definition drillholes,

for a total of 8,784 m. Drillholes were strategically positioned in an attempt to increase the resource

estimates tonnage and classification (Table 9-1). In addition to drilling, geological mapping, an aerial

drone survey, a lake bathymetry survey and geotechnical and geochemical sampling was also carried out.

Further, monitoring wells and vibrating piezometer were installed for baseline studies and a surficial soil

geotechnical drilling and test pit program was carried out.

This technical report is a compilation and evaluation of the historical data collected between 1972 and

1982, and the recent data collected by Montem in 2018 and 2019. A summary of the exploration data set

is provided in Appendix 1.

1.5 DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATIONS

Over the years several companies have developed operations at Tent Mountain. Currently, the remaining

infrastructure on the Project consisted of a network of roads, adits and open pits. Between 1922 and

1929, Spokane and Alberta Coal and Coke Company extracted less than 100,000 tonnes of coal from two

underground mines in the Boulton area (Figure 6-2). Between 1948 and 1980, Coleman Collieries Ltd.

intermittently mined an undefined amount of coal from 5 pits located across the Project area (probably

in the order of 10 to 20 Mt). Limited historical data indicates that the product coals were blended and

exported to Japan as a medium-volatile metallurgical coal (Booth and Leigh, 1973). As of the date of this

report, Montem has not conducted any mining at Tent Mountain.

1.6 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE

The Mineral Resources presented in Section 14 have been prepared in conformity with the JORC Code

(2012) and meet the 2014 Australian Guidelines for Estimation and Classification of Coal Resources.

The drillhole database used in the resource estimation is of acceptable quality and has been

independently verified by Dahrouge Geological Consulting Ltd. (“Dahrouge”). A three-dimensional


geologic model was constructed using Seequent LeapfrogTM Geo Software (LeapfrogTM) and Maptek

VulcanTM Software (“VulcanTM”). A geological coal seam model was generated using historical, and 2018

and 2019 lithology logs, as well as, downhole geophysics (density and gamma logs) and surface geological

controls.

Coal Resources at Tent Mountain are contained in the Jurassic-Cretaceous coal seams S7, S6, S5, S4, S3

and S2 of the Mist Mountain Formation. The Tent Mountain coals are considered a Medium Volatile

Bituminous coal under ASTM standards, that could be marketed as a semi-hard to hard coking coal (HCC)

(Cameron and Williams, 2020).

Total In-Place Coal Resources at Tent Mountain are estimated at 3.7 million tonnes classified as

Measured, 48.1 million tonnes classified as Indicated, and 8.4 million tonnes classified as Inferred (Table

1-1). Resources were defined using a 0.6 m minimum aggregate coal thickness, a 500 m maximum

vertical depth from surface and a 20:1 bcm/in-situ tonne cumulative strip ratio. The coal resources at

Tent Mountain have open cut potential. The steep mountainous terrain at the Tent Mountain Mine limits

the deepest portions of the resource to areas immediately below the more elevated portions of the

Project such as peaks and topographic highs. Overall, more than 80% of the resource occurs at depths

of less than 300m total depth with the shallower portions of the deposit occurring in the more aerially

extensive hillside flanks and valleys. The deposit geometry makes the resource potentially suitable for

a Mountain Top Removal (MTM) mining approach which justifies the application of a 500 m depth cut-

off for open cut resources. Similar mining approaches are currently in practice at Canada at Elkview,

Fording River and Grand Cache Coal Mines. The MTM approach is also widely practiced in the

Appalachian Mountains in the eastern United States. A definitive evaluation of the mining methods has

not been completed and included in this report.

Factors influencing the reasonable prospects for economic extraction include:

• Favourable geology - other nearby producers of coking coal from the same formation and seams

• Access by road and historical exploration trails is generally good and have been rehabilitated or

upgraded

• Proximity to rail, power, highway and municipal infrastructure and services is good, with the

towns of Coleman and Blairmore (combined population about 4,000) approximately 20 and 25

km, respectively, to the east by road via Hwy 40/ Hwy 3.

• The Canadian Pacific rail line runs through Coleman and through the Crowsnest pass about 6 km

north of the Property and connects with the main CNR east-west line for access to Vancouver and

Prince Rupert ports.

• Abundant available water

• Nearby labour pool - 4 operating surface coking coal mines in the general area

• Favourable government and social attitude to resource extraction

Table 1-1 In-Place Coal Resource Summary (kilotonnes)

Area In-Place Coal Resources (kilotonnes)

ASTM Group Measured Indicated Inferred

Alberta Medium Volatile

Bituminous 3,655 40,796 5,193

British Columbia Medium Volatile

Bituminous 0 7,290 3,183

Total 3,655 48,085 8,376


1.7 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The 2018 and 2019 exploration programs conducted by Montem validated historical results and the

Authors consider the historical exploration to be of professional quality and can see no reason for the

results presented to have been intentionally misleading.

The presented Resource at Tent Mountain contains significant thicknesses of Medium Volatile

Bituminous coal under ASTM standards, that could be marketed as a semi-hard to HCC (Cameron and

Williams, 2020). Significant work has been undertaken to investigate the historical geological

interpretations and to confirm the location and data sourced from historical exposures, trenches, adits,

and drill sites in order to model and permit future exploration programs. Access by road and historical

exploration trails is generally good and have been rehabilitated or upgraded. Proximity to rail and

municipal infrastructure and services is also good, with the towns of Coleman and Blairmore (combined

population about 4,000) approximately 20 and 25 km to the east by road via Hwy 40/ Hwy 3. The

Canadian Pacific rail line runs through Coleman and connects with the main CNR east-west line for access

to Vancouver and Prince Rupert ports.

There are currently four producing coking coal mines in the Sparwood/Elk Valley area, BC. All four mines

are owned by Teck Resources Ltd. and they have an aggregate annual capacity of approximately 25 Mt.

Mining personnel for the Project could potentially be sourced from Coleman and Blairmore or other

surrounding settlements.

The entirety of the Property lies within Category 4 land zone with respect to coal exploration and

development as designated by the 1976 Coal Development Policy for Alberta. This land category allows

for exploration to be permitted under appropriate control, and surface or underground mining or in-situ

operations may be considered subject to proper assurances respecting protection of the environment

and reclamation of disturbed lands.

The Property contains significant coal resources at extractable depths as supported by historical mining

operations and the current resource. The economics of coal extraction have not been evaluated as part

of this report.

Structurally, the deposit is reasonably well understood, and an alternative interpretation is possible, but

not likely. The current interpretation has not materially changed since the 1970’s. Multiple workers have

reviewed the interpretation in the ensuing period. The main factor affecting coal seam continuity is the

interplay of faulting, folding, seam dip, depth of weathering and surface topography. Seams show a highly

variable thickness which reflects depositional and structural variations as well as the localized

thickening of coal seams which occur in the apex of folds and adjacent to reverse faults.

Tent Mountain has previously been subject to historical mining activities and contains areas of exposed

and partially backfilled open cut voids as well as limited waste dumps. The underlying original

topography in waste covered areas was estimated by digitizing topography from Coleman Collieries

working plans that predated mining. This approach, although technically robust, introduced some

uncertainties in defining the contact between in-situ and disturbed material. This in turn prevented the

declaration of Measured Resources in some places.

All remaining coal resources at Tent Mountain have open cut potential. Resources have a moderate level

of confidence. Drillholes are spaced closely enough for coal seam continuity and quality to be assumed

justifying Measured, Indicated and Inferred status within the declaration areas.


The Project is considered one of merit and further exploration and definition is warranted. The Authors

recommend additional exploration including resource drilling, bulk sampling, geotechnical and

hydrogeological studies and geochemical analysis:

Resource & Historical Workings Drilling:

• 1,000-2,000 m of isolated infill reverse circulation drilling in areas classified as Inferred to

increase the resource classification to Indicated or Measured. Infill drilling will also target

evaluating resource extent to the north, along the Crowsnest Syncline, confirming historical

results and better defining the structurally complex area around the Pit 2 location.

• 1,000 m of rotary air blast and 500 m of large diameter core drilling within the BC portion of the

Project to confirm historical coal intersections and results, target primary and secondary

geological structures, and obtain coal quality data.

• Downhole geophysical logging and ATV/OTV surveys of all drillholes to consistently identify coal

seams and geologic structures.

• 400-600 m of sonic drilling to test and better define the historical mine workings, as well as mine

dumps west of Pit 4 and within Pit 2 (Figure 6-2) as limited detailed information exists for the

workings or mine dumps.

Bulk Sampling (Coal Quality):

• 6” or 9” coring, or test pit excavation of economic coal seams exposed in historical pits on the

Property. Potential exists to collect bulk samples of Seam S4 and Seam S5 from one of the historical

Pit 4 benches; near surface coal in this location would have only been exposed at surface since the

completion of mining in 1980, minimizing the depth of oxidation. Bulk samples for Seam S7 and

Seam S6 may require large diameter drilling, which would target shallow intersections based on

the 2019 geological model.

• Bulk sample material should be used to complete pilot wash plant testing and confirm the

flowsheet of the coal preparation plant. Additional washability and detailed analysis on a range of

size fractions should be completed to increase confidence in the 2018 and 2019 coal quality

analysis and to confirm the optimum size and density at which to prepare clean coal composites.

Petrographic analysis and detailed coking coal tests, including carbonisation studies, should be

completed on simulated clean coal products to further define market specifications for the

resource.

Geotechnical and Geochemical Analysis:

• 400-600 m of HQ split-tube diamond drilling on the BC Coal Lease, targeting both the hanging wall

and footwall of the proposed pit shell. Drilling would include onsite detailed geotechnical logging

and the collection of unconfined compressive strength (UCS) samples every 30 m, and direct shear

samples where suitable samples are identified. Additionally, point load tests should be taken every

3 m or at every change in lithology, with more tests made near UCS sample locations. Program

should be reviewed and evaluated by a geotechnical engineer.

• Coal samples collected from the HQ drillholes should be submitted for static testing (acid-base

accounting and elemental composition) and followed by a subset of samples sent for phase 2

testing at a later time (shake flask extractions and kinetic testing).


Hydrogeological Studies:

• Installed monitoring wells and vibrating wire piezometers should be monitored on a regular basis

to increase understanding of the interaction of the Pit 4 and Pit 2 lakes with the surrounding

environment. This data will be relevant for both mine design and environmental studies on the

Property.

• Packer tests should be performed on the geotechnical HQ drillholes on the BC portion of the

Property to evaluate hydraulic conductivity near proposed pit walls of varying rock types and

structures.


2 INTRODUCTION

Dahrouge Geological Consulting Ltd. (“Dahrouge”) has been retained by Montem Resources Alberta

Operations Ltd. (“Montem”), to prepare a report on the coal resources of the Tent Mountain Mine (“Tent

Mountain” or “The Project” or “the Property”), located in southwest Alberta and southeast BC, Canada

(Figure 2-1). The coal resources are comprised of the Jurassic-Cretaceous Mist Mountain Formation coal

seams, S7, S6, S5, S4, S3 and S2. The Tent Mountain Resource Estimate dated February 20, 2020 is

contained within one BC Coal Lease, 11 Alberta Coal Leases and 10 Alberta Freehold (all minerals except

gold and silver) Tenements.

This report was commissioned by Montem to comply with regulatory disclosure and reporting

requirements outlined in the Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources

and Ore Reserves: the JORC Code (2012), which is the minimum standard required for the reporting of

Mineral Resources in a public document. In 2018, Tamplin Resources Pty Ltd. generated a JORC Resource

Statement and Resource estimate in accordance with the JORC Code for the Property based upon

available historical data. Subsequent to this Coal Resource Statement, an additional 76 drillholes,

totalling 8,785 m, were completed on the Property, and additional data for 43 historical drillholes was

made available; these historical drillholes were excluded from 2018 resource statement due to deficient

data. The purpose of this report is to update the 2018 Resource Statement, incorporating the 2018 and

2019 drilling results with the historical coal data.

The information in this report that relates to Exploration Results and Mineral Resources is based on

information compiled by Mr. Bradley Ulry, Mr. John Gorham and Mr. Matthew Carter, Competent Persons

and members of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta (APEGA); a

Recognized Professional Organizations (RPO) where they hold the accreditation of Professional

Geologist.

Mr. Bradley Ulry, P. Geo., Mr. John Gorham, P. Geol., and Mr. Matthew Carter, P. Geo., of Dahrouge

Geological Consulting are the Qualified Persons responsible for preparing this Competent Persons Report

on the Property in accordance with the JORC Code (2012).

Mr. Ulry, Mr. Gorham and Mr. Carter are employees of Dahrouge Geological Consulting Ltd. of Edmonton

Alberta and are independent of Montem Resources Alberta Operations Ltd., and its parent company

Montem Resources Ltd.

Mr. Ulry, Mr. Gorham and Mr. Carter have sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of

mineralization and type of deposit under consideration, and to the activity being undertaken to qualify

as Competent Persons as defined in the 2012 Edition of the Australasian Code for Reporting of

Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves.

Mr. Ulry, Mr. Gorham and Mr. Carter consent to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on their

information in the form and context in which it appears.

Mr. John Gorham visited the Property December 5th and December 12th to 13th, 2018.

Mr. Bradley Ulry visited the Property from June 25th to 28th and July 6th to 12th, and September 12th to

13th 2019.

Mr. Matthew Carter did not visit the Property.


Figure 2-1 The Tent Mountain Mine Location


3 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS

This report has been prepared by Bradley Ulry, P. Geo., John Gorham, P.Geol., and Matthew Carter, P.Geo.,

with Dahrouge Geological Consulting Ltd. The information, conclusions, opinions, and estimates

contained herein are based on field observations as well as published and unpublished data (Section 17:

References):

• Information available to the Authors at the time of preparation of this report;

• Assumptions, conditions, and qualifications as set forth in this report;

• Government maps, reports, assessment reports; and

• Data, reports, and other information supplied by Montem

o Primary reports used in this compilation include:

▪ A&B Mylec Pty Ltd (2020) – Coal Quality Assessment to Support Tent Mountain

FS

▪ Kobie Koornhof Associates Inc. (2019) - Assessment of Tent Mountain Seam

Quality and Pricing

▪ Tamplin Resources Pty Ltd. (2018) – Competent Person’s Report on Coal

Resources for the Tent Mountain Project

▪ Geoff Jordan and Associates (2017) – Technical Report on the Tent Mountain

Coal Property

▪ Norwest Corp. (2005) – Draft Technical Report Tent Mountain Coal Property

▪ L.A. Smith & C.B. Wrightson (1982) - Geological Evaluation of the Tent

Mountain Area

▪ Coleman Collieries Ltd. (1975) - Preliminary Feasibility Report

▪ Coleman Collieries Ltd. (1975) - Preliminary Underground Feasibility Report

▪ Coleman Collieries Ltd. (1977) – 1976 Exploration Report

The Authors have relied upon the professional quality of the historical work reported in various studies

ranging from exploration reports to NI 43-101 and JORC Compliant Resource Statements. The Authors

have no reason to believe that the information used in the preparation of this report is false or

purposefully misleading and have relied on the accuracy and integrity of the data referenced in Sections

11 and 18 of this report.

Dahrouge relied upon the findings of an independent study on the Tent Mountain Mine product coal

quality completed by A&B Mylec Pty Ltd. titled Coal Quality Assessment to Support Tent Mountain FS

(Cameron and Williams, 2020).

For the purpose of this report, the Authors have relied on ownership information provided by Montem

and verified through the Alberta Government interactive coal tenure map system

https://gis.energy.gov.ab.ca/Geoview/Coal

While title documents were reviewed for this study, it does not constitute, nor is it intended to represent

a legal, or any other opinion as to title.

Some relevant information on the Property presented in this report is based on data derived from reports

written by geologists and/or engineers whose professional status may or may not be known in relation

to the JORC definition of a Competent Person. The Authors have made every attempt to accurately convey

the content of those files but cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the work contained within

those files; however, the Authors believe that these reports were written with the objective of presenting

https://gis.energy.gov.ab.ca/Geoview/Coal


the results without any misleading intent. In this sense, the information presented should be considered

reliable, unless otherwise stated, and may be used without prejudice by Montem.

The results and opinions expressed in this report are based on the Authors’ review of the geological and

technical information listed in Section 17 of this report. Although the Authors have carefully reviewed all

information provided by Montem and believe it to be reliable, the Authors have not conducted an in-

depth independent investigation to verify its accuracy and completeness.

Except for the purposes legislated under provincial securities laws, any use of this report by a third party

is at that party’s sole risk.


4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION

4.1 LOCATION

The centre of the Property is located at 49°34'20"N, 114°42'20"W, approximately 16 km southwest of

Coleman in the Crowsnest Pass region of Alberta, Canada (Figure 2-1). The city of Calgary is

approximately 250 road kilometers to the northeast. The Property straddles the Alberta-BC border and

includes 11 Alberta Coal Leases, 10 Alberta Freehold (all minerals except gold and silver) Tenements, 5

Alberta Freehold (surface only) Tenements and 1 BC Coal Lease. Access to the Property is via a historical

mine haul road which intersects the Crowsnest Highway (Highway 3). The Property is 6 km south of a

main rail line operated by Canadian Pacific Railway, providing potential access to export terminals in

Vancouver and Prince Rupert. The tenements are also situated 2 km north of the Coal Mountain Rail Spur

in BC; operated by Teck Resources Ltd.

4.2 MINERAL TENURE

Mineral Rights Ownership

In Alberta, mineral ownership refers to one’s legal possession as well as the right to win, work and

recover specific minerals from under a parcel of land. There are two types of ownership in Alberta: a

surface rights owner and a mineral rights owner. An individual or entity with surface rights owns the

surface and substances, such as sand and gravel, but not the minerals. An individual or entity with

mineral rights, owns all mineral substances found on and under the property. The mineral owner has the

right to explore for and recover the minerals but must do this in a reasonable manner as to not

significantly affect use of the surface. Individuals or entities may have both types of ownership but there

are often different surface and mineral owners on the same land. Mineral ownership is defined in detail

in the Mines and Minerals Act and its associated regulations. Mineral rights are registered in accordance

with the Land Titles Act.

Freehold Titles

In Alberta, Freehold Titles have mineral rights registered with the land ownership. These titles are

identified and described by a unique LINC number (Land Identification Numeric Code). A LINC number

is a unique, non-intelligent system-generated number having no inherent meaning and comprised of 10

numeric characters with the last character being a check digit. The LINC number assigned to a parcel of

land remains as a permanent identifier of that parcel until the parcel boundaries are changed. While this

LINC number is not intended to replace the legal description of a land parcel, it can be used to supplement

the legal description in order to more clearly identify a parcel in cases where similar legal descriptions

exist for multiple parcels.

Coal Lease Agreements

In Alberta, a coal lease grants the right to explore the land for coal within the boundaries of the lease. A

coal lease does not grant surface rights; a surface lease or grant is required. Applications for coal lease

agreements in Alberta must be accompanied by the $625.00 application fee, the first year's rent ($3.50

per hectare with a minimum of $50.00), plus GST as applicable. Once received, an application is

checked to confirm the requested mineral rights are available. The application is then reviewed with

respect to development restrictions or policies, and the appropriate method of disposition. Depending

upon the circumstances, a successful coal lease application may lead to an agreement being issued

directly to the applicant or may result in competitive bidding.


Coal leases are granted for a term of 10 to 15 years, with option to apply for renewal at expiry. Once the

lease applications have been granted, the holder must pay an annual rent of $3.50/hectare to the Alberta

government to retain the Property, as well as royalties according to the Coal Royalty Regulation if any

production occurs. The current royalty rate for Crown-owned bituminous (Mountain/Foothills) coal is

1% of mine-mouth revenue before mine payout, and 1% of mine-mouth revenue plus 13% of net revenue

after mine payout.

Coal leases in Alberta are also subject to the following legislation and policies:

• Mines and Minerals Act - Parts 2 and 3 pertain specifically to coal leasing.

• Mines and Minerals Administration Regulation

• Coal Conservation Act - A coal lessee requires a Mine Permit and a Mine License to develop a mine

in the location of a lease. Approval for development and mining is administered by the Alberta

Energy Regulator (AER).

• 1976 Coal Development Policy for Alberta

• Integrated resource plans, policies, and any local restrictions set by the Government of Alberta

under the Mines and Minerals Act and other legislation.

• Information Letters relating to Mineral Rights Acquisition and Mineral Rights Tenure

In BC, a coal lease grants the right to explore the land for coal within the boundaries of the lease. A coal

lease does not grant surface rights; a surface lease or grant is required. Applications for coal lease

agreements in BC must be accompanied by the $1000.00 application fee, the prescribed rent ($10 per

hectare), a plan and description of the location and a plan of operations showing the exploration,

development and production to be carried out during the term of the lease supported by data and

relevant reports. The application is then reviewed by the minster and if the submission meets the

required criteria, the minster issues a lease to the applicant, outlining terms and conditions associated

with the lease.

BC coal leases are granted for a term no longer than 30 years, with option to apply for renewal of no more

than 15 years. Once the lease applications have been granted, the holder must pay an annual rent of

$10/hectare to the BC government to retain the Property.

4.3 TENT MOUNTAIN MINERAL TENURES

The Property is currently owned by Montem, subject to the purchase agreement conditions outlined

below in Section 4.4. The Property is comprised of Freehold Tenements and Coal Leases that encompass

an area of approximately 1,683.1 ha; it includes 11 Alberta Coal Leases (Table 4-1; Figure 4-1), 1 BC Coal

Lease (Table 4-2; Figure 4-1) and 10 Alberta Freehold (all minerals except gold and silver) Tenements

(Table 4-3; Figure 4-1). In addition Montem holds 5 Alberta Freehold (surface only) Tenements (Table

4-4; Figure 4-1). Four of these overlap Coal Leases owned by Montem and one is northeast of the main

property covering a portion of the access road.

Table 4-1 Montem Resources Tent Mountain Mine Alberta Coal Leases

Lease Type

Agreement Number Status Term Date Expiry NTS Map

Sheet Area (ha)

013 1305100739 Active 01-Oct-05 01-Oct-20 82G10 312.2 013 1305090663 Active 21-Sep-05 21-Sep-20 82G10 94.3 013 1306080821 Active 26-Aug-06 26-Aug-21 82G10 64.8


Lease Type

Agreement Number Status Term Date Expiry NTS Map

Sheet Area (ha)

013 1306080822 Active 26-Aug-06 26-Aug-21 82G10 213.6 013 1305090664 Active 21-Sep-05 21-Sep-20 82G10 48.8 013 1305090665 Active 21-Sep-05 21-Sep-20 82G10 57.5 013 1305090668 Active 21-Sep-05 21-Sep-20 82G10 102.8 013 1306080819 Active 26-Aug-06 26-Aug-21 82G10 122.1 013 1305090667 Active 21-Sep-05 21-Sep-20 82G10 38.5 013 1305090666 Active 21-Sep-05 21-Sep-20 82G10 151.3 013 1306080820 Active 26-Aug-06 26-Aug-21 82G10 64.9

Total Area: 1270.9

Table 4-2 Montem Resources Tent Mountain Mine BC Coal Lease

Agreement Number

Status

Term Date Expiry NTS Map

Sheet Area (ha)

CL389283 Active 04-May-78 03-May-27 82G10 153.4

Total Area: 153.4

Table 4-3 Montem Resources Tent Mountain Mine Alberta Freehold (all minerals except

gold and silver) Tenements

LINC Number Status Term Date Expiry NTS Map Sheet Area (ha)

0021432364 Active N/A N/A 82G10 8.1

0021430038 Active N/A N/A 82G10 7.7

0034328290 Active N/A N/A 82G10 8.1

0021452040 Active N/A N/A 82G10 15.8

0021452073 Active N/A N/A 82G10 15.9

0021430012 Active N/A N/A 82G10 64.9

0021432372 Active N/A N/A 82G10 24.3

0021452058 Active N/A N/A 82G10 32.6

0021432357 Active N/A N/A 82G10 48.9

0021430020 Active N/A N/A 82G10 32.6 Total Area: 258.8

Table 4-4 Montem Resources Tent Mountain Mine Alberta Freehold (surface only)

Tenements

LINC Number Status Term Date Expiry NTS Map Sheet Area (ha)

0021438320 Active N/A N/A 82G10 2.1

0021452065 Active N/A N/A 82G10 12.2

0021438213 Active N/A N/A 82G10 49.1

0021438205 Active N/A N/A 82G10 8.0

0021438338 Active N/A N/A 82G10 5.7 Total Area: 77.0


Figure 4-1 Tent Mountain Tenure Map


4.4 THE TENT MOUNTAIN MINE PURCHASE AGREEMENT

In 2016, Montem entered into an agreement with Prairie Mines & Royalty ULC, subject to certain terms

and conditions, to acquire the Chinook Properties: Chinook South, Chinook North, Vicary-Racehorse,

Isola, Oldman, and Tent Mountain, the latter being the subject of this report. The purchase agreement

was for C$12,000,000 with an initial consideration of C$1,000,000. The remaining C$11,000,000 is

outstanding and payable as described below (Montem Prospectus, 2018):

Licencing Payments - C$5,000,000

o C$5,000,000 payable within thirty days of receipt of a mining licence for any of the

Chinook Properties not including Tent Mountain.

OR

o C$1,500,000 within ninety days of receipt of the Tent Mountain renewed or amended

coal mining licence;

o C$1,500,000 within ninety days of receipt of an amended Alberta Environmental

Protection and Enhancement Act for Tent Mountain; and

o C$2,000,000 on or before the earlier of thirty days receipt of any coal mining licence

related to the Chinook Properties not including Tent Mountain and January 31, 2027.

If none of these licencing payments have been triggered by December 31, 2021 and the relevant mining

applications have not been submitted, then the amounts will be payable on the earlier of the above

triggers or in five equal payments of C$1,000,000, payable annually before January 31, between 2022

and 2026.

If none of the licencing payments have been triggered by December 31, 2021 and the relevant mining

applications have been submitted, then the amounts will be payable on the earlier of the above triggers

or in five equal annual payments of C$1,000,000 before January 31 between 2024 and 2028. If the

submitted applications are rejected by authorities, the licence-related payments will be payable in

accordance with this provision.

Production Payments - C$6,000,000

o C$6,000,000 within thirty days of the first 1,000,000 tonnes of coal from any of the

Chinook Properties, not including Tent Mountain

o If the first 1,000,000 tonnes of coal comes from Tent Mountain then: C$500,000 is

payable within thirty days of production of first 500,000 tonnes; C$500,000 payable

within thirty days of production of second 500,000 tonnes; C$500,000 payable within

thirty days of first anniversary of such 1,000,000 tonnes; C$500,000 payable within

thirty days of the second anniversary of such 1,000,000 tonnes and the remaining

C$4,000,000 payable within thirty days of production of 1,000,000 tonnes from the

other Chinook Properties.

4.5 PERMITS, APPROVALS & AGREEMENTS

Various permits and approvals are required for exploration on the Property; these permits are outlined

in Table 4-5. There is an existing Alberta Mine Permit C85-16G and BC Mine Permit BC C-108 for Tent

Mountain, as well as a granted Environmental Protection and Enhancement Act (EPEA) approval (EPEA

47679-02-00). This current EPEA approval does not allow mining at Tent Mountain and will require an


amendment before re-commencement of mining at Tent Mountain. The Permits and EPEA include the

previously disturbed portions of Tent Mountain with the undisturbed portions of the Property generally

sitting outside the permit boundaries (Figure 4-2).

Additionally, road-use agreements are required for access to the Property. In Alberta, Montem has a

road-use agreement with the local coniferous timber licence holder, 770538 Alberta Ltd and in BC,

Montem has a road-use agreement with CanWel Building Materials Group Ltd., a logging company

operating in the area.

Table 4-5 Tent Mountain Permits and Approvals

Jurisdiction Government

Sector Type Status Number Description

BC BC MWLA Water

Management Approval (WMA)

Active PE-03986 Allows discharge of mine surface water through an approved discharge point

BC BC MEM Permit Active C-108 Identifies location permitted to mine and reclaim

AB AER CCA Permit Active C85-16G

Outlines the area in which Montem can mine and requires both Federal and Provincial approval for commencement of mining.

AB Public Lands

Act LOC Active 436

Licence of Occupation (LOC) allows access to the Site

AB AEP EPEA Approval Active 47679-02-00

The overarching approval to manage environmental impacts while mining. The current EPEA approval covers reclamation activities and will be required to be amended to operational requirements

AB PLEA ROE Active 854-614 Right of Entry (ROE) allows access to the Site

AB AER MSL Active 708546

MSL to cover ponds found on the east side of Tent Mountain. Access and use of the ponds was permitted to manage a flood event in 2013 and remain active

AB AER CEP Active 180001

Allows Montem to pursue a Coal Exploration Program to support the requirements of applying for pit and dump permits.

AB AER CEP Active C2018-4 Deep Drilling Permit

AB AER CEP Active 00438734 License to Temporarily Divert Water

4.6 COAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY FOR ALBERTA

All coal deposits in Alberta are subject to the provisions of the Coal Development Policy for Alberta, which

was originally enacted in 1976. This policy defines different parts of the land area of the province in

which specific regulations for coal development apply. The Tent Mountain Mine is located entirely in an

area classified as Coal Category 4 (Figure 4-2):


• Exploration may be permitted in Category 4 lands under appropriate control, and surface or

underground mining or in-situ operations may be considered subject to proper assurances

respecting protection of the environment and reclamation of disturbed lands.

4.7 INDIGENOUS PEOPLES CONSULTATION

Several Indigenous groups are located within 100 km of the Project. In March 2017, Montem initiated

consultation with Indigenous peoples that may have interest in the Project and surrounding area, in

order to begin building relationships and develop an understanding of each group’s needs and internal

processes.

The Indigenous peoples consultation program is an ongoing process, primarily associated with obtaining

licences and permits required for exploration work and mining activities, including an Environmental

and Protection Act approval (EPEA), a Water Act approval (WA) and a Public Lands Act approval (PLA).

The Alberta Consultation Office (ACO) is responsible for determining which Indigenous peoples must be

consulted and the level of consultation required; levels vary from no consultation required to an ACO

prescribed consultation that is audited every two weeks by the ACO and the Indigenous peoples involved.

For the Tent Mountain Mine, Montem is currently in the ACO managed Indigenous peoples consultation

process with all Treaty 7 First Nations in Southern Alberta, which includes:

• The Blackfoot (Niitsitapi) peoples

o The Piikani Nation

o The Kainai (Blood) Nation

o The Siksika Nation

• The Stoney Nakoda Nations

o The Chiniki Nation

o The Bearpaw Nation

o The Wesley Nation

• The Tsuut’ina Nation.

Regarding Tent Mountain, Montem has also engaged with:

• All Treaty 7 First Nations (listed above)

• The Ktunaxa people

• The Metis Nation of Alberta

• The Metis Nation of BC

• The Shuswap Indian Band (East Kootenay, BC)

• The Foothills Ojibway First Nations


Figure 4-2 Property Restrictions and Mine Permit


4.8 ENVIRONMENTAL LIABILITIES

The Mist Mountain Formation, the targeted coal-bearing unit, naturally contains selenium. In alkaline,

aerobic conditions, elemental selenium and selenide minerals are oxidized releasing soluble selenate

ions which can be transported in surface runoff. Large scale surface mining in the Elk Valley, BC has

enriched the Elk River in selenium. Any future mine development on the Property will require the

development of a selenium management plan. Historical access and mine workings have been reclaimed,

with certificates issued. Montem’s ongoing liability is only for disturbance created during current

exploration activities.

4.9 OTHER SIGNIFICANT FACTORS AND RISKS

The provincial border between Alberta and BC bisects the southern portion of the Property. The Property

falls within the southwest limits of the South Saskatchewan Regional Plan (“SSRP”), which was

established to manage and monitor the environment and support responsible development of Alberta’s

resources. Approximately 4.6 ha of one Alberta Freehold (all minerals except gold and silver) Tenement,

LINC 0021452073 lies within the SSRP (Figure 4-2). The strategies developed within the SSRP are

designed to minimize the amount land used for new development, including the usage of historical roads

and trails for future exploration program access, and progressive reclamation of areas no longer being

used.

The Alberta portion of the Property is located within a the Mountain Goat and Bighorn Sheep range

(Figure 4-2). In this area, any disturbances that may have direct or indirect adverse effects, such as

permanent alteration of habitat must be avoided or mitigated. Montem implemented a ‘wildlife

monitoring’ program in 2018 which included daily monitoring of wildlife and installation of wildlife

cameras in favorable terrain most suited to goat and bighorn sheep. These cameras were monitored on

a weekly basis, to track movements of wildlife on the Property. Additionally, the entire Property is

located within a the Grizzly Bear Protection Zone (Figure 4-2); within this zone, regulations require that

Montem provide and preserve either core or secondary grizzly bear habitat.

The Alberta Coal Leases fall within the Rocky Mountain Forest Reserve. This reserve is managed by the

province primarily for resource development management and recreational use purposes, although the

designation of wilderness areas has been used to restrict certain types of access for management of

habitat and conservation purposes.

New regulations are being adopted for reclamation certification in Alberta. Reclamation certificates for

Coal Exploration Permits granted after the beginning of 2019 will have to be applied for separately

through the Alberta Energy Regulator’s Digital Data Submission (‘DDS’) system called ‘OneStop’.

Following the guidelines of the “Green Side Up” program, at least two growing seasons will be required

before a review of the reclaimed area can take place. Once a review is complete an application can then

be made for the reclamation certification. An independent environmental consultant will have to be

retained to do aerial and site evaluations and to submit Phase 1 Electronic Application Submission

documents and a Professional Declaration by that individual/firm will be required for each permit. This

is a substantial departure from the previous regulatory framework and shifts the responsibility for

inspection from government agency to contractors at considerably increased cost to the permittee.

The Authors are not aware of any other significant factors or risks that may affect access, title or the right

to perform work at the Tent Mountain Mine.


5 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND

PHYSIOGRAPHY

5.1 TOPOGRAPHY, ELEVATION, AND VEGETATION

The Tent Mountain Mine is situated within Alberta’s southernmost subalpine-montane sub-region of the

larger Rocky Mountain Natural Region. The area exhibits a generally steep and highly variable

topography dominated by Tent Mountain with a relief of over 610 m. The valleys surrounding the

mountain have elevations of approximately 1460 m, while the peak of Tent Mountain is 2148 m in

elevation. The mountain is approximately 5 km long, trending north-south, and is up to 1.5 km wide.

Vegetation on the Property is dominated by Engelmann spruce and subalpine fir at higher elevations and

lodgepole pine, Douglas fir and mixed grasslands at lower elevations.

5.2 INFRASTRUCTURE AND LOCAL RESOURCES

Access to the Property is via a historical mine haul road which intersects the Crowsnest Highway,

approximately 15 km west of Coleman. The mine road is 8 km long and accesses the northern end of the

Project. Historical mining trails and roads on the Property south of Pit 5 were reclaimed when Coleman

Collieries Ltd. shut down the mine in the 1980s. A network of exploration trails was constructed on the

Property for the 2018 and 2019 drilling campaigns; historical trails were used where possible to

minimize disturbance.

A secondary Canadian Pacific rail line runs through Coleman and connects with the main Canadian

National Railway east-west line for access to Vancouver and Prince Rupert ports. Typically, unit coal

trains in this system run from 130 to 150 cars of 100 t capacity each. The nearest airstrip is located in

Pincher Creek, Alberta, approximately 50 km east of Coleman along Highway 3.

Accommodations, food, fuel and other necessary services are available in Coleman and Blairmore,

Alberta, which are located 15 to 20 km east of the Property. Coleman and Blairmore have a combined

population of approximately 4,000. The local economy is primarily based on tourism, forestry, and coal

mining. Three waste treatment plants, 2 secondary oxidation ditches and 1 extended-aeration lagoon are

available locally. In addition, mobile waste disposal services are available to manage drill-site generated

waste.

Several coal mines, including Teck Resources Ltd.’s Elkview Mine are currently in operation in the area.

Mining personnel for the Property could potentially be sourced from Coleman and Blairmore, or other

surrounding settlements including, Sparwood (pop. 4,500), Bellevue (pop. 800) and Cowley (pop. 250).

Sparwood is a major coal mining community located 35 km west of Coleman across the Alberta-BC

border, and has many relevant services available to potentially support the development of Tent

Mountain.

5.3 CLIMATE

The climate is subalpine with mild summers and long, cold winters. Average summer temperatures are

15° to 22°C and average winter temperatures are -5° to -12°C, with extremes of -35°C and -40°C. Rainfall

averages about 23 cm per year; snowfall averages 75 cm per year, with the majority falling in December

and January. Chinook wind patterns are common in the area.


6 HISTORY

Coal was first noted in southeastern BC around 1845 by Father Pierre-Jean DeSmet, a Jesuit missionary.

In 1873, Michael Phillips found and collected coal samples from exposures along the Elk River and sent

them to Dr. G.M. Dawson with the Geological Survey of Canada; Dawson later evaluated the coal deposits

as part of a mapping program in 1887. Coal mining in the Crowsnest Pass area began in 1898 at Fernie,

BC, and in 1901 at Frank, Alberta. Coking coal was additionally extracted from seams at Hillcrest,

Coleman, Bellevue, and other smaller communities within Alberta, continuing into the 1950’s.

Between 1922 and 1929, the Spokane and Alberta Coal and Coke Company (“SACC”) extracted coal from

two underground mines within the Crowsnest Syncline (North Boulton area) (Smith, 1982). It is

estimated that less than 100,000 tonnes of coal were mined from North Boulton. According to Panchysyn

et al. (1973), SACC also carried out underground mining at South Boulton; however, there is no data

regarding this operation.

Coleman Collieries Ltd. (“Coleman Collieries”) acquired the Alberta Coal Leases of the Property sometime

prior to 1949; in 1949, Coleman Collieries acquired the BC coal licenses for the Property. Starting in 1948,

Coleman Collieries began intermittently mining at North Boulton and Pit 2. In addition to the mining,

Coleman Collieries conducted some drilling at these prospects, as well as at Pit 4 and Pit 5. There is no

accurate record of exploration programs completed prior to 1973. Between the 1960s and early 1970s,

Vard Johnson completed maps and cross-sections of the Property.

In 1973, Coleman Collieries, with the assistance of Manalta Coal Ltd. (“Manalta”), initiated an extensive

exploration program that consisted of drilling and adit drivage; the initial focus was on evaluation of coal

potential in Pit 3 and Pit 4. In addition to the drilling in 1973, Coleman Collieries contracted Hulburt and

Thompson Company Ltd. to provide an air photo interpretation of the Tent Mountain area; and Manalta

to provide a geological map and report of the nine drillholes Manalta had completed. In 1975 and 1976,

Coleman Collieries drove three adits: one in the East Flank of Tent Mountain and two in the Southern

Extension area (Figure 6-2). Additionally, Coleman Collieries excavated approximately 40 trenches as

part of their exploration program; data was poorly recorded for these trenches. The final mine closure at

Coleman Collieries, took place in 1983.

In 1976, Paul Dyson was contracted to map and compile a detailed report on the geology and coal mining

potential along the eastern flank of Tent Mountain (Beresford, 1977). Then in late 1981, Bruce Wrightson

and Les Smith completed detailed mapping of the Property.

In 1981, Crowsnest Resources Ltd. conducted drilling on the BC Coal Lease area of the Property; this

lease was owned by Shell Canada Resources Ltd. A total of 4 rotary drillholes were drilled, totalling 685

m.

In 1982 the Property was acquired by Norcen Energy Resources, then by Manalta in 1985 and then by

Luscar Ltd., in 1998. Luscar Ltd. was a subsidiary of Sherritt International Corp. (“Sherritt International”)

(Geoff Jordan Associates Corp., 2017) at the time, and it changed its name to Prairie Mines & Royalty Ltd.

in 2006 (“Company overview”, n.d).

In 2005, Norwest Corp. (“Norwest”) completed a Resource Estimate on the Property for Sherritt

International. Norwest incorporated data from 130 historical drillholes and estimated a coal resource of

68.4 Mt Indicated and 1.2 Mt Inferred medium volatile bituminous coal. This estimate is not NI 43-101

compliant as it was never submitted to the Canadian Securities Administrators for compliance approval.

In 2014, Westmoreland Mining LCC (“Westmoreland”) purchased Sherritt International’s coal business

and Prairie Mines & Royalty ULC became its subsidiary (“Westmoreland completes acquisition”, 2014).


In 2016, Montem Resources Alberta Operation Ltd. (“Montem”) made an agreement, subject to certain

terms and conditions described in Section 4.4 of this report, to purchase the Tent Mountain Mine from

Prairie Mines & Royalty ULC.

In 2017, Geoff Jordan Associates Corp., completed a Resource Estimate on the Tent Mountain Mine (Geoff

Jordan Associates Corp. 2017), that re-evaluated and expanded on the 2005 Norwest Resource Estimate.

The estimated resource incorporated data from 130 historical drillholes and estimated a combined open

cut and underground resource of 61,780 kilotonnes Indicated and 2.677 kilotonnes Inferred medium

volatile bituminous coal. This estimate is not NI 43-101 compliant as it was never submitted to the

Canadian Securities Administrators for compliance approval.

In 2018, Montem contracted Tamplin Resources Pty. Ltd. to complete a Competent Persons Report for

the Property in accordance with the JORC Code (2012). The final report used 115 of an identified 183

drillholes and estimated a Resource of 37 million tonnes Indicated and 8 million tonnes Inferred, surface

minable medium volatile bituminous coal (Tamplin Resources Pty Ltd., 2018).

6.1 HISTORICAL MINE GRID AND COORDINATE SYSTEMS

The Tent Mountain Mine utilized a localized mine grid system during its operations, which is no longer

used for the Property. The historical maps and reports for the Property also utilized an outdated imperial

coordinate system. Jordan (2017) completed a comprehensive review of the historical drillhole locations

using a Dyson, 1977 map and Land Surveyors Drillhole Location Survey File included in the Dyson 1977

report. Jordan was able to verify the accuracy of the Dyson map and convert all of the drillhole location

survey data from the historical imperial coordinate system to the metric system. The coordinate system

now used for all data from the Property is UTM NAD83 Zone 11.

6.2 TOPOGRAPHY

A topographic LiDAR survey was carried out by Airborne Imaging Inc. of Calgary, Alberta on behalf of

Westmoreland in June 2017. The survey covered a 115.1 km² area of the Property. The outputs of the

survey included 1m grids (XYZ ASCII) bare earth and full feature, high quality satellite imagery (Geotiffs)

and 1m contours (in dxf format). The survey results had a horizontal accuracy of 30 cm and a

fundamental vertical accuracy (on hard surfaces) of 15 cm. Table 6-1 outlines the acquisition parameters

provided by Airborne Imaging Inc. to complete the LiDAR survey.

Table 6-1 Lidar Survey Acquisition Parameters

Date Mission Flying Height

(m)

Flying Speed

(knots)

Pulse Rate Rep

(kHz)

Scan Frequency

(Hz)

Scan angle

(degree)

Side Lap %

Point Density

(pts/m²)

LiDAR System

06/24/2017 6417175a 1000 160 800 270 60 50 8.2 Riegl

Q1560

6.3 HISTORICAL DRILLING

Historical drilling programs have been identified as early as the 1950’s, but the available information for

this report has been restricted from 1972 to 1977. Work completed prior to 1972 and the associated

surface mine operations have been poorly documented, and no exploration or production records were

available to the Authors.


Between 1972 and 1977, Coleman Collieries drilled or deepened between 192 and 223 drillholes on or

adjacent to the Property.

• Jordan et al. (2017) reported 223 drillholes including 121 core drillholes and 102 rotary drillholes.

Of the 223 drillholes, 130 were on the Property.

• Tamplin (2018) reported 208 drillholes including 119 core drillholes and 89 rotary drillholes. Of

the 208 drillholes the compiled drillhole database included 183 drillholes, of which 115 were

modelled and 68 were excluded.

A current data compilation has located and compiled a total of 192 drillholes, including 119 core

drillholes and 73 rotary drillholes, on or adjacent to the Property (Table 6-2). Appendix 1 contain tables

of both included and excluded drillholes and coal intersections used in the resource estimation.

Table 6-2 Historical Drillhole Summary for the Tent Mountain Mine

Operator Campaign Core

Drillholes Rotary

Drillholes Metres Drilled

Coleman Collieries Ltd. 1972 7 3 743

Manalta Coal Ltd. 1973 - 11 563


Coleman Collieries Ltd. 1974 28 - 7917




Shell Canada Resources Ltd. 1981 - 4 685

Coleman Collieries Ltd. not available - 9 not available

Coal samples were collected from 68 of the historical drillholes and classified into logical seam units in

accordance with the geophysical logs for each drillhole. Coal recovery was poor, ranging from 40% to

100% and averaging 70%, due to the extremely friable nature of the coal and considerable internal

micro- faulting within the seams. The poor core coal recovery is typical of coals in the area; it can be

improved with a triple tube core barrel and larger diameter drilling.


Figure 6-1 Tent Mountain Historical Drillhole Locations


6.4 HISTORICAL TRENCHING AND ADITS

Coleman Collieries drove three adits (Figure 6-2) and excavated approximately 40 surface trenches as

part of their extensive exploration program. Data for the trenches was poorly recorded and the locations

could not be adequately verified for direct use in the geological model. The East Flank/Ptolemy Adit was

232 m long and intersected coal seams S6, S5 and S4. The other two adits were driven at the South

Extension: The seam 2 adit was 57 m long and intersected coal seam S2, the seam 4 adit was 75 m long

and intersected coal seam S4. Bulk samples were collected from all coal seams intersected by the adits

and they were sent to Birtley Engineering (Canada) Ltd. for analysis.

6.5 UNDERGROUND MINING

Coal was extracted from two underground mines in the Boulton area (Figure 6-2) between 1922 and

1929. The workings were operated by the SACC and it has been estimated that production was less than

100,000 tonnes (Norwest Corp., 2005).

6.6 OPEN PIT MINING

Open pit mining was initiated on the Property in 1948 by Coleman Collieries. Production was sporadic

but significant amounts were extracted up until the mine closed in 1980. The open pit mining operations

occurred in four separate and distinct pit areas on the Property: Pit 1 and 2, Pit 3, Pit 4 and Pit 5 (Figure

6-2; Table 6-3) (Beresford, 1977 and Smith, 1982). Limited historical data indicates that the product

coals were blended with coals from Coleman Collieries’ nearby Chinook Properties operations and

exported to Japan as a medium-volatile coking coal (Booth and Leigh, 1973).

Table 6-3 Pit Summary for the Tent Mountain Mine

Production Year(s)

Pit Location Intersected Coal Seams

Comment

1948-1975 1 & 2 Crowsnest Syncline S5 5 Mt of coal extracted. These two pits have been amalgamated. S2 thickened by Crowsnest Syncline.

1952-1955 & 1975-1979

3 Crowsnest Syncline S2; S4 Pit is along the thrust fault on the west dipping limb of the Crowsnest Syncline

1978-1980 4 East Flank (of Tent Syncline)

S5; S6; S7 Pit has further mining potential south and north along strike. Pit was identified as PIT 5 in Tamplin (2018).

1974-1979 5 Tent Syncline S5; S6; S7

Seams dip into mountain slope upper seams completely mined out. Pit was identified as PIT 4 in Tamplin (2018).


Figure 6-2 Tent Mountain Historical Mine Workings


6.7 HISTORICAL MINERAL RESOURCES

During the 1970’s and early 1980’s Coleman Collieries completed internal Reserve Estimations,

including:

• Coleman Collieries Limited (1975) - Preliminary Feasibility Report

• Coleman Collieries Limited (1975) - Preliminary Underground Feasibility Report

• L.A. Smith & C.B. Wrightson (1982) - Geological Evaluation of the Tent Mountain Area

These documents have been followed by three Mineral Resource Estimates that have been prepared for

the Property. These are summarized below:

6.7.1 2005 NORWEST CORP. RESOURCE ESTIMATE

In 2005, Sherritt International contracted Norwest to complete a resource estimate for the Property. The

resource incorporated data from 130 drillholes; the estimated resource is summarized in Table 6-4. This

technical report was never submitted to the Canadian Securities Administrators and therefore cannot be

considered NI 43-101 compliant.

Table 6-4 In-Situ Coal Resource Estimate by Norwest Corp. (2005)

Area Coal Seam

ID ASTM Group

Measured (ktonnes)

Indicated (ktonnes)

Inferred (ktonnes)

Tent Mountain

n/a Medium Volatile

Bituminous 0 68.438 1,220

Total: 0 68,438 1,220

6.7.2 2017 GEOFF JORDAN ASSOCIATES CORP. RESOURCE ESTIMATE

In 2017, Montem contracted Geoff Jordan Associates Corp. to complete a comprehensive review of the

historical drillhole data and provide a combined surface and underground mineable resource estimate

for the Property. The resource estimate incorporated geophysical and/or geological data from 138

historical drillholes. Table 6-5 summarizes the resource estimate presented by Geoff Jordan Associates

Corp. The resource applies a minimum seam thickness of 1 m for surface mining, minimum seam

thickness of 2 m for underground mining, a maximum mining depth of 600 m, and a 10:1 bcm/in situ

tonne cumulative coal strip ratio. This technical report was never submitted to the Canadian Securities

Administrators and therefore cannot be considered NI 43-101 compliant.

Table 6-5 In-Situ Coal Resource Estimate by Geoff Jordan and Associates Corp. (2017)

Area Coal Seam

ID ASTM Group

Measured (ktonnes)

Indicated (ktonnes)

Inferred (ktonnes)

Tent Mountain

Seam 2 Medium Volatile Bituminous 0 19,697 0

Seam 4 Medium Volatile Bituminous 0 14,003 0

Seam 5 Medium Volatile Bituminous 0 18,162 1,841 Seam 6 Medium Volatile Bituminous 0 9,918 836

Total: 0 61,780 2,677

6.7.3 2018 TAMPLIN RESOURCES PTY LTD. RESOURCE ESTIMATE

In 2018, Montem contracted Tamplin Resources Pty Ltd. (“Tamplin Resources”) to complete a Resource

estimate in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) for the Tent Mountain Mine. Tamplin Resources


constructed the geological model and resource estimate using historical data from 115 drillholes and

coal quality data from 51 drillholes. Tamplin Resources estimated the Tent Mountain Mine to have a total

coal Resource of 45 million tonnes (Table 6-6); the estimate applied a minimum mining thickness of 0.3

m, a maximum mining depth of 250 m from surface and a 20:1 bcm/in situ tonne cumulative coal strip

ratio.

The 2018 geological model utilized a HARP (Horizontal Adaptive Rectangular Prism) block model created

in Vulcan software using a grid size of 25m. A relative density for coal of 1.45 gm/cc was assumed and a

15 m base of weathering cut-off was assigned. The model utilized the topographic Lidar survey data from

2016. Coal quality parameters were not modeled due to lack of current data and insufficient data on a

ply by ply basis.

Table 6-6 In-Situ Coal Resource Estimate by Tamplin Resources Pty Ltd. (2018)

Area Coal

Seam ID

Measured Indicated Inferred

Mt

Quality

Mt

Quality

Mt

Quality

Specific Energy Mj/kg

Ash% Specific Energy Mj/kg

Ash% Specific Energy Mj/kg

Ash%

Alberta n/a 0 0 0 28 23.87 30 8 23.31 31

BC n/a 0 0 0 9 23.31 31 0 0 0

Rounded Total (Mt): 0 37 8


7 GEOLOGICAL SETTING AND MINERALIZATION

7.1 REGIONAL GEOLOGY

The Property is situated within the Lewis Thrust Sheet of the Rocky Mountain Front Ranges in

southeastern BC and southwestern Alberta (Smith, 1982). Regionally the area is bound by the north

trending Livingston Thrust in the east, and the Erickson Fault in the west. Stratigraphy of the area is

characterized by Precambrian to Upper Cretaceous rocks of the Fernie Group, Kootenay Group, Spray

River Group, Etherington Formation, Rocky Mountain Group and Mount Head Formation (Figure 7-1;

Figure 7-3 and Figure 7-4). Economic coal potential in the Front Ranges lies in the Mist Mountain

Formation of the Kootenay Group.

Figure 7-1 Stratigraphic Column (Modified from Richardson et al., 1992)

The oldest relevant unit in the area, the Jurassic Fernie Group, is comprised of dark-grey and black shales

locally interbedded with phosphatic sandstones and limestones; cherty limestones, bedded siltstones,

sandstones and oolitic limestones; coquinas; concretionary bands; and glauconitic sandstones (Hall,

1984).


The Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous Kootenay Group overlies the Fernie Group and is subdivided into

three formations, the Morrissey, Mist Mountain and Elk Formations.

• The Morrissey Formation overlies the Jurassic Fernie Group and is subdivided into the basal

Weary Ridge Member and the upper Moose Mountain Member. The Weary Ridge Member is

comprised of a calcareous sandstone with minor interbedded siltstone and mudstone. The Moose

Mountain Member is comprised of a siliceous sandstone with interbedded carbonaceous and

argillaceous layers (Gibson, 1985). Thin, less than 50 cm thick, coal seams occur rarely in the

Moose Mountain Member.

• The Mist Mountain Formation overlies the Morrissey Formation and bears coal seams with

economic potential (Kim, 1976). Locally this formation can be subdivided, from bottom to top, into

the Adanac, Hillcrest and Mutz Members (Norris, 1959); regionally, these members are not

recognized. The Mist Mountain Formation is comprised primarily of dark-grey siltstone, with

lesser sandstone, mudstone, shale and local conglomerate interbeds (Gibson, 1985). Coal seams

in the Mist Mountain Formation vary in thickness and can be up to 18 m thick; they range from

bituminous in the south to semi-anthracite in rank in the north (Smith et. al, 1994). Progressive

south to north changes in depositional environments causes the Mist Mountain Formation to

grade into the contemporaneous but mainly coal-barren Nikanassin Formation to the north of

Clearwater River (~latitude 52°).

• The Elk Formation overlies the Mist Mountain Formation and is comprised of interbedded

sandstone, siltstone, mudstone, shale and chert-pebble conglomerate; however, it is absent in the

Crowsnest Pass area (Gibson, 1985).

7.2 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY

Stratigraphy in the area was subject to extensive folding and faulting during the Late Cretaceous

Laramide Orogeny. The major thrust faults that developed are the Ptolemy Thrust, Tent Thrust, Boulton

Thrust and Crowsnest Thrust; these thrusts all generally dip to the west. Associated with these major

thrust faults are major fold axial surfaces, which also generally dip to the west. The folds range from

broad-upright to overturned-concentric, and they have been cut and repeated by thrust faults, tear faults,

and late extensional faults. This major faulting and folding affected the coal seam thickness, lateral

continuity, geometry and quality.

Although extensive deformation of coal-bearing strata has enhanced the economic potential of the

region, it has also complicated mining and exploration. Bedding slip surfaces, joints and cleats, and

extension, contraction and wrench faults have been recognized as the fundamental fabric elements

within many of the major coal beds of the Kootenay Group (Norris, 1971). Notably, in other areas,

shearing of coals has resulted in increased ash yields, locally promoted in situ oxidation and caused

unpredictable roof conditions, making underground mining difficult.

7.2.1 REGIONAL FAULT STRUCTURES

There are four regional scale thrust faults and one regional scale normal fault mapped at Tent Mountain.

The regional trends of the thrust faults are close to North-South and current modelling has all thrust

faults truncating on the eastern most Ptolemy Thrust. Secondary fault structures have been mapped at

surface and were used as controls for the geological model.


Ptolemy Thrust Fault

The Ptolemy Thrust is the most easterly major fault in the Property area and was probably the first to

develop in the region (Smith, 1982). It thrusts Fernie Group strata on top of the Kootenay Formation,

dips westward at approximately 65° and runs parallel to the bedding of the Fernie Group. Subsequent

folding and splay faulting of the stratigraphy resulted in the Tent Syncline, Tent Anticline and the Boulton

Syncline. This fault runs east of the current exploration activity and has limited surface and drillhole

control.

Tent Thrust Fault

The Tent Thrust dips westward at about 70° in the southern area and shallows to about 40° in the

northern area of the Property. It follows parallel to bedding throughout most of the Property, except in

the south, where a ramp developed and resulted in the fault plane climbing higher in the stratigraphic

section, from the lower Adanac Member to the Mutz Member of the Mist Mountain Formation. The Fernie

Group as well as the Moose Mountain Member and Adanac Member are the main stratigraphic units

present in the Tent Thrust Sheet. Locally the Tent Thrust is folded and in the same area, the strike of the

Tent Thrust and the overlying strata is oblique to the regional trend at about 300°.

Boulton and Crowsnest Thrust Faults

The Boulton and Crowsnest Thrusts are later, low angle to bedding splays off the Ptolemy Thrust. The

Boulton Thrust dips westward at about 70° in the southern area and decreases to about 35° in the

northern area of Tent Mountain. Within the Boulton Thrust Sheet, the Crowsnest Anticline and Syncline

formed as a result of fault drag; in the area of Pit 2 these folds are overturned, and north and south of Pit

2, these folds open and develop upright limbs. The western slope of Tent Mountain is an extensive dip

slope comprised of Kootenay Group strata brought up by the Crowsnest Thrust, which dips westward at

about 50°.

North Normal Fault

The North Normal fault is a stratigraphically truncating fault that has not been defined by drilling but has

been supported in the regional Alberta Geological Mapping of the area. This fault strikes roughly 300-

degrees and is steeply dipping (80 degrees) toward the north-east, at approximately 30-degree dip

direction. It is defined in the current interpretation as a younger fault that off-sets the Ptolemy, Tent and

Boulton thrust faults. The current phases of work have not applied efforts to define this fault as it falls

north of the current Resource. Future evaluations of this structure would help define the potential

northern extension of the coal-bearing formations.

7.2.2 REGIONAL FOLD STRUCTURES

Subsequent folding and splay faulting of the stratigraphy resulted in the formation of the Tent Syncline,

Tent Anticline and the Boulton Syncline. The fold axes of the Tent structures generally trend 165° to 180°

and plunge at 5° to 10° NE. The Boulton Syncline axis trends 340° and plunges 0° to 10° NE. The Tent and

Boulton fold structures truncate against the Tent Thrust. These folds play an important role in

structurally controlled coal thickening along their fold axis. Historically Pit 4 and Pit 1-2 took advantage

of mining these zones of seam thickening. Secondary fold structures have been mapped at surface and

were used as controls in the geological model.


Figure 7-2 Regional Geology Map


7.3 PROPERTY GEOLOGY

The Property is dominantly comprised of strata from the Jurassic Fernie Group and Late Jurassic to Early

Cretaceous Kootenay Group. On the Property, the Mist Mountain Formation contains potentially

economic coal. No intrusions have been mapped or interpolated to occur within the Project area. In the

south area of the Property, the Ptolemy and Tent thrusts converge leaving only the Fernie Group, Moose

Mountain Member and the lower part of the Adanac Member (including seam S2) strata in the Ptolemy

Thrust Sheet.

All three members of the Mist Mountain Formation have been identified on the Property: the Mutz,

Hillcrest and Adanac. The Mutz Member comprises up to 90 m of fluvial siltstone with minor interbedded

claystone and coaly partings. Coal seams S5, S6 and S7, as well as a minor coal seam between S5 and S6,

occur in the Mutz Member. The Hillcrest Member is ridge-forming and lies conformably below the Mutz

Member. It consists is up to 30 m of fluvial channel sandstone deposits with interbedded siltstone and

claystone. The Hillcrest Member contains no major coal seams. The Adanac Member is recessive and lies

conformably below the Hillcrest Member. It forms the base of the Mist Mountain Formation and consists

of shale, siltstone and fine-grained sandstone. Coal seams S2 and S4 occur consistently, while coal seam

S3 occurs intermittently in the Adanac Member on the Property.

Conformably below the Mist Mountain Formation, lies the Moose Mountain Member of the Morrissey

Formation. It is comprised of a massive cliff-forming siliceous sandstone with minor amounts of

mudstone, siltstone and coal. The Moose Mountain Member varies from 4 to 36 m in thickness on the

Property. The basal Weary Ridge Member of the Morrissey Formation has not been identified on the

Property.

The Morrissey Formation is conformably underlain by the Jurassic Fernie Group consisting of a recessive

sequence of marine shale, limestone and fine-grained sandstone. The Fernie Group is 150 to 300 m thick

and consists of predominantly fissile black shales, with a fine-grained argillaceous sandstone unit in the

upper portion of the formation. Much of the structural deformation in the Foothills and Front Ranges is

localized within the incompetent strata of the Fernie Group.

On the Property, the complex interplay of thrusting, folding and high relief topography controls the

distribution of coal seams and their associated sub-crops, as well as coal seam thickness. Generally, the

Tent Mountain coal resources occur in a north‐south direction along the strike of the western side of

Ptolemy Fault, and in the synclines and anticlines between the Boulton, Tent and Ptolemy faults. Seams

may be thickened by faulting or folding, or they can be thickened by both mechanisms. Such an example

is along the south wall of Pit 4, where seam S6 has been thickened along the axis of the Tent Anticline

and subsequently thickened further by the Tent Thrust Fault (Wrightson, 1982).

The principal coal seams on the Property, in descending order, are seams S7, S6, S5, S4, S3 and S2. Each

seam comprises multiple coal, dirty coal and parting horizons; average seam and parting (interburden)

thicknesses are summarized in Table 7-1. Seams S6, S5, and S4 are currently divided into 3 plies, and

seams S3 and S2 are currently divided into 2 plies. Though the coal and sediment intervals appear to be

complexly interbedded and interfingered, the seam packages have distinct geophysical signatures that

can generally be identified along the currently known strike length of the deposit.

Seam S2 is the lowest seam in the sequence lies at the base of the Adanac Member. The seam is made up

of two coal plies, S2L which averages 2.20 m in thickness and S2U which averages 2.83 m thickness. Seam

S3 consists of an intermittent shaly coal and coal interval that lies in the middle of the Adanac Member.

The seam is divided into two plies, S3L and S3U, averaging 1.18 m and 1.15 m thick, respectively. Due to

the intermittent nature of the coal seam, previous geological models for the Property did not include this


marker seam; however, the additional data available to Dahrouge allowed it to be incorporated into the

current model. Historical work mixed intersections of S3 with intersections of S2, resulting in zones

where S2 was projected closer to surface than the geology supported.

Seam S4 lies at the top of the Adanac member and is divided into three plies: S4L averaging 1.65 m thick,

S4M averaging 2.34 m thick and S4U averaging 2.10 m thick.

Seam S5 is the lowest seam of the Mutz member and is divided into three plies: S5L averaging 4.26 m,

S5M averaging 3.33 m and S5U averaging 2.99 m. The S5 seam is persistent and well developed

throughout the Property.

Seam S6 is the middle seam of the Mutz member, and is divided into three plies: S6L averaging 2.01 m,

S6M averaging 2.58 m and S6U averaging 2.43 m. The S6 seam is a persistent and well-developed seam

throughout the Property. Previous studies modelled S6 as one distinct geological unit; however, the

additional data available to Dahrouge allowed the seam to be split into plies.

Seam S7 is the uppermost seam of the Mutz Member found on the Property. The Seam is more variable

than seams S5 and S6, and averages 1.96 m thick. Available data and coal intersections for seam S7 is

limited; therefore, it has not been divided into plies and has been modelled as one geological unit.

Table 7-1 Average Coal Seam Thickness at Tent Mountain

Seam Package Seam Package

Thickness (m)

Composited Coal Thickness

(m)

Composited Interburden

Thickness (m) Ply Name

Ply Thickness Ave (m)

S7 1.96 1.96 0 S7 1.96

Midburden 40

S6 7.02 3.91 3.11

S6U 2.43

S6M 2.58

S6L 2.01

Midburden 57

S5 13.58 8.08 5.5

S5U 2.99

S5M 3.33

S5L 4.26

Midburden 39

S4 6.99 3.65 3.34

S4U 2.10

S4M 2.34

S4L 1.65

Midburden 34

S3 2.90 1.66 1.24 S3U 1.15

S3L 1.18

Midburden 93

S2 10.59 4.98 5.61 S2U 2.83

S2L 2.20

Total 306.04 24.24 18.8


Figure 7-3 Tent Mountain Geology


Figure 7-4 Tent Mountain Stratigraphic Column (Modified from Richardson et al., 1992)


8 EXPLORATION

Montem contracted Dahrouge Geological Consulting Ltd. (‘Dahrouge”) and SRK Consulting Ltd (“SRK”)

to carry out the 2018 and 2019 field programs at the Tent Mountain Mine. No surface sampling, trenching

or mapping was completed during the 2018 winter drill program. In 2019, a detailed desktop compilation

of historical data and a field ground program was implemented. This program included geological and

structural mapping, measured section mapping, an aerial drone survey and a lake bathymetry survey.

These programs were implemented to better understand the geology and legacy mine workings.

Historical exploration is described in Section 6. All historical and current drillholes and intersections

used in the resource model are included in Appendix 1.

8.1 GEOLOGICAL AND STRUCTURAL MAPPING

A detailed geological compilation and mapping program was completed during the 2019 program. Prior

to starting the program Montem and Dahrouge collected and digitized available historical project records

that included, legacy geological maps, cross sections, mine plans and historical workings.

• Primary digitized surface maps Included:

o 1976 Coleman Collieries Tent Mountain Seam and Index Map

o 1977 Coleman Collieries Exploration Drillholes and Sample Adits

o 1978 Coleman Collieries Topography and Mine Pits

o 1982 Coleman Collieries Drillhole and Mine Workings Map

o 1982 Luscar Geological Plan Map

o 1996 GSC Open File 3158 Geological Map

o 2017 Westmorland Bedrock Geology Map

• Primary digitized Cross-sections Included:

o 1976 Coleman Collieries cross-sections (26 section)

o 1982 Coleman Collieries cross-sections (22 sections)

o Luscar Cross-sections (5 sections)

o Geological Survey of Canada surface map and cross sections (6 sections)

The digitized maps and sections were added to the Leapfrog model and cross-referenced against the

historical drillhole database prior to the program and then against the compiled 2019 drillhole database

and surface mapping after the program (Figure 8-1 and Figure 8-2). All supported structural

measurements, traces and stratigraphic units were added to the geological model and incorporated into

the current interpretation.

The 2019 desktop structural compilation program was followed up by a field validation and mapping

program. The 2019 field structure mapping program was led by an SRK structural geologist and

supplemented by Dahrouge. This program focused on defining the primary structures and locating the

secondary structures affecting the coal seams and geotechnical mine planning. In-situ orientation

measurements were collected digitally in the field and incorporated into the structural interpretation

(Table 8-1). The 2019 field data was used to select between historical interpretations that were

consistent with current control points. This data helped remove conflicting historical interpretations,

while maintaining valuable information collected during historical mining.


Figure 8-1 Example Digitized Cross-Section Series, 1982 Coleman Collieries

Figure 8-2 Example Digitization of Cross-Section 1380 from 1982 Coleman Collieries


Table 8-1 Compilation Summary of Geological Control Points

Measurement Type Campaign / Source Surface Points Subsurface Points (DH,

OTV and ATV)

Bedding

2019 (SRK + DGI) 104 205

1996 (GSC) 285 -

(Westmorland) 293 -

Fault SRK (2019) 71 87

Fractures/Joints 2019 (SRK) 161 3238

8.2 ROADCUT AND DRONE MEASURED SECTIONS

During access construction stratigraphic rock units, including coal seams were exposed at surface. These

roadcuts were excavated to better expose coal seams to allow for detailed geological mapping. Once

exposed, select roadcuts were surveyed and a measured section collected. At each roadcut, an anchor

point was marked on the outcrop above the coal seam and surveyed with the Topcon RTK. A tape

measure was used to measure the depth intervals and lithologies across the exposed section. Coal seam

orientation and thickness was measured and hanging wall and footwall rock units were recorded. The

dip and azimuth of the line (from the anchor point to end point) was recorded using a Brunton compass.

These surveyed road cuts were treated like surface trenches/drillholes and used to better constrain the

geologically modelled surface projections of the coal seams. A total of seven roadcuts with coal seams

were mapped and geologically logged (Table 8-2; Figure 9-1).

Table 8-2 2019 Roadcut Measured Sections

Drillhole ID Type Easting

(m) Northing

(m) Elev. (m)

Azimuth Dip Depth

(m)

TR-TM19-001 TR 666659 5491783 1914 88 -40 1.6

TR-TM19-002 TR 666678 5491778 1911 106 -24 9.5

TR-TM19-003 TR 666693 5491774 1908 70 -32 2.6

TR-TM19-004 TR 666724 5491769 1903 82 -38 2.2

TR-TM19-005 TR 666774 5491742 1898 128 -14 10

TR-TM19-006 TR 666446 5492363 1898 88 -50 1.8

TR-TM19-007 TR 666463 5492424 1893 20 -22 4.2

In areas that were not accessible due to adverse ground conditions, including steep unstable slopes and

pits, several measured sections were created using the aerial drone footage. Once georeferenced, the

high-resolution drone imagery was imported into Leapfrog modelling software. Across visible coal seam

outcrops, surface data points were collected like drillholes, with locations, orientations and lithologies.

Coal seam intersections and interburden were measured directly from the imagery in the 3-D modelling

software. An azimuth and dip were assigned to the drillholes which were then incorporated into the

geological model. A total of 21 drillholes were created using the aerial drone imagery (Table 8-3),

however they were only used for geological constraint and were excluded from resource estimation.


Table 8-3 2019 Aerial Drone Imagery Measured Section Locations (UTM NAD83)

Drillhole ID Type Core Size

Easting (m)

Northing (m)

Elev (m)

Azimuth Dip Depth

(m)

TR-TM19-008 TR NA 666078.50 5491679.00 2101.00 90 -40 14.78

TR-TM19-009 TR NA 666109.71 5491572.40 2109.70 90 -40 46.70

TR-TM19-010 TR NA 666134.31 5491436.04 2114.00 90 -40 19.00

TR-TM19-011 TR NA 666064.50 5491782.80 2100.00 90 -40 9.20

TR-TM19-012 TR NA 666178.82 5491809.35 2095.00 100 -30 12.00

TR-TM19-013 TR NA 666121.70 5491502.70 2119.00 90 -40 49.90

TR-TM19-014 TR NA 666332.00 5492731.00 1919.00 55 -30 31.00

TR-TM19-015 TR NA 666386.92 5492766.90 1876.75 50 -30 25.00

TR-TM19-016 TR NA 666296.00 5492798.00 1842.00 50 -30 38.00

TR-TM19-017 TR NA 666201.00 5492770.00 1852.00 50 -25 37.00

TR-TM19-018 TR NA 666187.00 5492761.00 1859.00 290 -25 50.50

TR-TM19-019 TR NA 666084.00 5492783.00 1828.00 290 -25 51.00

TR-TM19-020 TR NA 666162.00 5492751.00 1875.00 280 -25 38.00

TR-TM19-021 TR NA 666298.69 5492712.98 1921.01 50 -60 9.50

TR-TM19-022 TR NA 666230.00 5492740.00 1899.00 40 -50 12.50

TR-TM19-023 TR NA 666410.00 5492829.00 1858.00 40 -30 21.50

TR-TM19-024 TR NA 666184.00 5492789.00 1827.00 350 -44 39.00

TR-TM19-025 TR NA 666201.00 5492770.00 1852.00 300 -50 78.00

TR-TM19-026 TR NA 666207.00 5492733.00 1899.00 292 -38 23.00

TR-TM19-027 TR NA 666207.00 5492733.00 1899.00 355 -50 28.00

TR-TM19-028 TR NA 666201.00 5492770.00 1852.00 359 -47 64.00

8.3 TOPOGRAPHY

The topographic surface utilized for the 2018 and 2019 exploration programs and the 2019 geological

model was from an airborne LiDAR survey performed by Westmoreland in 2017, discussed in section 6.2

of this report. The survey produced 1m grids (XYZ ASCII) which were input into the Leapfrog 3D

modelling software. The LiDAR surface was then compared against drillhole collar locations surveyed

using the Topcon RTK in 2018 and 2019 to verify its accuracy; no discrepancies greater than 1 m were

identified. Since no material ground disturbance had occurred on the Property since 2017, the survey

was deemed valid. Database collar locations were compared against surface topography that was

constructed from the LiDAR (2017) survey and high-resolution drone survey (2019 – see below). Pit 4

floor topography was added to the geologic model from bathymetry survey (2019 - see below). Historical

mine working solids were modelled using the LeapfrogTM Intrusion geological modelling method and

were constrained using limited drill intersections, surface mapping, and historical cross-sections. The

basal surface of historical dumps and pits were used to generate an approximate bedrock surface that

could be used to build the base of weathering surface (Figure 13-2).

8.4 AERIAL DRONE SURVEY

In 2019, an aerial drone survey of the Pit 4 and Pit 2 highwalls was completed by SRK. The objective of

the survey was to create a high-resolution, three-dimensional image in order to identify structural

features and coal seam outcrops in the pit walls. Control points were used to aid in the georeferencing of

the image. Once georeferenced, the images were loaded into 3D modelling software and aided in the

structural and geological interpretation of the Property.


8.5 LAKE BATHYMETRY SURVEY

In 2019, a bathymetry survey was performed on the Pit 4 Lake by McElhanney Ltd., of Calgary, Alberta.

The survey utilized a Phantom 4 RTK UAV drone, Trimble RTK ground survey equipment and a Teledyne

Odom CV 100 Dual Frequency Echosounder remote control boat. The objective of the survey was

twofold; to determine the volume of water within the Pit 4 Lake, as well as map the lake bottom to create

a detailed surface of the historical Pit 4 extents.

McElhanney provided Dahrouge with an AutoCAD civil DWG file of the pit floor for incorporation into the

2019 geological model. Dahrouge exported the AutoCAD file to a standard DWG file, which was then

loaded into VulcanTM modelling software. A surface of the pit floor was then triangulated from the

imported DWG file. The survey area was then clipped out of the original topographic surface and the

bathymetry survey was then merged with the original topographic surface. The merged surface, with

accurate extents of the historical Pit 4, was then used in the geological model.


9 DRILLING

A total of 76 drillholes, totalling 8,784 m, were completed for resource definition purposes between 2018

and 2019 (Table 9-1; Table 9-2; Figure 9-1). Drillhole types included air rotary, 6” large diameter core,

reverse circulation and HQ diamond drillholes. Drillhole locations were based off a drill plan created

using the 2018 JORC resource model by Tamplin (2018). All drillholes drilled in 2018 and 2019 were

incorporated into the 2019 geological model and 2019 Resource Statement (See Appendix 1)

Table 9-1 2018 and 2019 Drillhole Summary

Year Drillhole Type #

Drillholes Meterage

2018

air rotary 12 1,211

6" large diameter core 4 235

HQ diamond drill 3 420 Total: 19 1,866

2019

air rotary 30 3,822

reverse circulation 6 452

6" large diameter core 14 1,099

HQ diamond drill 7 1,545

Total: 57 6,918

In 2018, Montem contracted Geotech Drilling Services Ltd. (“Geotech”) of Vernon, BC to conduct the

drilling operations. Geotech provided one skid-mounted Zinex A5 diamond drill rig and two track-

mounted Fraste MultiDrill XL rigs, both of which were capable of rotary air blast (RAB) drilling and one

of which was capable of drilling 6” large diameter core. Downhole deviation, geophysical and acoustic

televiewer surveys were conducted by Century Wireline Services of Red Deer, Alberta.

In 2019, Montem contracted RC Drilling Ltd. (“RC”) of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Good Earth Drilling

Services Ltd. (“Good Earth”) of Rockyview County, Alberta and Paycore Enterprises Ltd. (“Paycore”) of

Valemount, BC, to complete the 2019 drilling. RC conducted the air rotary drilling with a track-mounted

drill rig. Good Earth conducted the reverse circulation and large diameter core drilling with a truck-

mounted Gefco Speedstar 30K drill rig. Paycore conducted the HQ diamond drilling with a track-mounted

Discovery II drill rig. Downhole deviation, geophysical, acoustic televiewer, optical televiewer and full

sonic wave surveys were conducted by DGI Geoscience Inc. of Toronto, Ontario.

In addition to the drilling, geotechnical and geochemical sampling was carried out on the HQ core.

Monitoring wells and vibrating piezometers were installed for baseline studies, and a surficial soil

geotechnical drilling and test pitting program was carried out. The drilling and associated activities are

discussed in further detail below.


Figure 9-1 2018 & 2019 Tent Mountain Drillhole Locations


Table 9-2 2018 and 2019 Drillholes

Year Drillhole ID Type Hole Size

Easting (m)

Northing (m)

Elev (m)

Az Dip Depth

(m)

Downhole Surveys

Deviation Density Neutron Dipmeter ATV OTV Sonic

2018 TM18-001 DD HQ 665544 5494159 1677 266 -50 82.95 YES YES NO NO YES NO NO

2018 TM18-002 RAB 5" 665547 5494353 1636 0 -90 60.00 YES YES NO YES NO NO NO


2018 TM18-004 RAB 5" 665679 5494083 1713 0 -90 119.00 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

2018 TM18-004LDC LDC 6” 665677 5494084 1713 0 -90 80.20 YES YES NO YES NO NO NO

2018 TM18-005 DD HQ 666449 5492329 1897 70 -60 185.15 YES YES NO YES YES NO NO



2018 TM18-008 RAB 5" 665719 5492896 1847 0 -90 138.00 YES YES NO NO NO NO NO





2018 TM18-012LDC LDC 6” 665995 5493757 1845 0 -90 56.33 YES YES NO YES NO NO NO

2018 TM18-013 RAB 5" 666404 5492706 1913 0 -90 150.00 YES NO NO NO NO NO NO

2018 TM18-013LDCA LDC 6” 666406 5492706 1913 0 -90 51.48 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO

2018 TM18-013LDCB LDC 6” 666407 5492707 1913 0 -90 47.32 NO YES NO NO NO NO NO

2018 TM18-014 DD HQ 665372 5492972 1818 61 -60 151.95 YES YES NO NO NO NO NO


2019 TM19-016 RAB 4 1/2" 666129 5494023 1769 0 -90 121.92 YES YES YES NO NO NO NO

2019 TM19-017 RAB 4 1/2" 665795 5493955 1776 90 -50 100.58 YES YES YES NO NO NO YES

2019 TM19-018 RAB 4 1/2" 666218 5493510 1828 90 -60 15.24 NO NO NO NO NO NO NO



2019 TM19-020LDC LDC 6" 666702 5491837 1874 0 -90 111.50 YES YES YES YES NO NO NO

2019 TM19-021 RAB 4 1/2" 666435 5492428 1910 0 -90 121.92 YES YES YES YES NO NO NO


2019 TM19-022LDC LDC 6" 666490 5492206 1899 0 -90 117.59 YES YES YES NO NO NO NO


2019 TM19-024 RAB 4 1/2" 666457 5492373 1894 0 -90 67.10 NO YES NO NO NO NO NO


2019 TM19-025 RAB 4 1/2" 666456 5492700 1886 90 -60 161.54 YES YES YES NO YES YES YES




2019 TM19-027LDCB LDC 6" 666605 5491793 1918 0 -90 100.36 YES YES YES NO NO NO NO














2019 TM19-038 DD HQ 666483 5491381 2056 0 -90 162.21 YES YES YES NO YES YES YES

2019 TM19-039 RAB 4 1/2" 666817 5491168 2013 90 -50 176.78 YES YES NO NO YES YES YES



Year Drillhole ID Type Hole Size

Easting (m)

Northing (m)

Elev (m)

Az Dip Depth

(m)

Downhole Surveys

Deviation Density Neutron Dipmeter ATV OTV Sonic


2019 TM19-041 RAB 4 1/2" 666719 5491475 1958 90 -60 164.59 YES YES NO NO NO NO NO

2019 TM19-042 RAB 4-1/2" 666695 5491637 1972 90 -50 173.73 YES YES NO NO YES YES NO



2019 TM19-045 RC 5 1/2" 666448 5492323 1898 0 -90 45.00 YES YES NO NO NO NO NO


2019 TM19-045LDCB LDC 6" 666450 5492316 1898 0 -90 36.98 YES YES YES YES NO NO NO









2019 TM19-052 RC 5 1/2" 666712 5491483 1958 0 -90 116.00 YES YES YES NO NO NO YES


2019 TM19-053 DD HQ 665882 5492682 1891 210 65 200.72 YES YES NO NO YES NO NO



2019 TM19-056 RC 5 1/2" 665977 5493956 1857 0 -90 46.00 YES YES YES NO NO NO NO

2019 TM19-057 RC 5 1/2" 665311 5492986 1788 0 -90 125.00 YES YES YES NO NO NO YES

2019 TM19-058 DD HQ 666514 5492024 1921 90 -60 194.23 YES YES NO NO YES YES YES

9.1 AIR ROTARY DRILLING (“RAB”)

In 2018, Geotech drilled a total of twelve vertical 5” diameter open drillholes by rotary air blast drilling,

totalling 1211.25 m (Table 9-2). The drill rigs utilized 6” surface casing, which was removed following

completion of the downhole geophysical and deviation surveys by Century Wireline. Three air rotary

drillholes, TM18-007, TM18-009 and TM18-010 encountered significant overburden and were

abandoned prior to reaching bedrock.

In 2019, RC drilled a total of thirty 4-1/2” diameter open drillholes by rotary air blast drilling, totalling

3,822.57 m. (Table 9-2). Drillholes were oriented both vertically and angled depending on their purpose.

Angled drillholes were lined up using an Azimuth Positioning System (APS II). The drill rig utilized 5-

1/2” welded surface casing, which was left in place following completion of each drillhole.

During both programs, solid drill returns were collected by the drill helper on an every metre basis,

stored in pre-labelled chip trays and later logged by a geologist. These drillholes were used for identifying

suitable coal seams for large diameter coring, for infill drilling and to provide open drillholes for

monitoring well and piezometer installations.

9.2 REVERSE CIRCULATION DRILLING

In 2019, six 5 ½” diameter drillholes were completed by reverse circulation drilling by Good Earth. The

drill rig utilized 7” welded surface casing, which was left in place following completion of the each

drillhole.


Solid drill returns were collected by the drill helper on an every metre basis, stored in pre-labelled chip

trays and later logged by a geologist. The reverse circulation drillholes, similar to the RAB drillholes, were

used for identifying suitable coal seams for large diameter coring, for infill drilling and to provide open

drillholes for vibrating wire piezometer installations.

9.3 6” LARGE DIAMETER CORE DRILLING (‘LDC’)

In 2018, Geotech drilled a total of four vertical 6” large diameter core drillholes, totalling 255.33 m (Table

9-1; Table 9-2). The purpose of the large diameter core was to increase core recovery and to obtain

enough coal material to send for coal quality analysis. Poor coal recovery from TM18-013LDC-A resulted

in the re-drill of another drillhole, TM18-013LDC-B, two meters away. No coal was recovered from TM18-

013LDC-B as the drillhole had to be abandoned.

In 2019, Good Earth drilled a total of fourteen vertical 6” large diameter core drillholes, totalling 1,098.78

m (Table 9-1; Table 9-2). Poor coal recovery from TM19-027LDC and TM19-045LDC resulted in two re-

drills.

The procedure used for the large diameter coring in 2018 and 2019 is as follows:

• A RAB (5” or 4 ½”) or RC (5 ½”) pilot drillhole was drilled in the proposed LDC location;

• A downhole geophysical log was completed, and results were used to identify coal seam(s)

suitable for coring. Coal seams were considered ideal if greater than 4 m thick and at a depth

between 20 m (below oxidation limit) to 90 m (depth limit of the drill rig) below surface;

• The drill rig was shifted 2 to 5 m on the drill pad to avoid interaction with the pilot drillhole;

• 10” surface casing was advanced into the bedrock and then 9” RAB open drillhole drilling was

carried out to approximately 1.5 to 3 m above the target coal seam identified from the geophysics;

• 6” large diameter coring was carried out until approximately 1.5 m below the coal seam and the

drillhole was terminated;

• If more than one coal seam was being targeted in the drillhole, the drill rig switched back to the 9”

RAB approximately 1.5 m below the base of the first coal seam and the process was repeated for

the lower coal seam

During the LDC drilling process, geologists were stationed in a mobile core processing facility located at

the drill site. Core was immediately photographed and geologically logged. In 2018, coal was sampled at

the drillsite. In 2019, the coal was placed in core boxes and sealed with plastic sheeting and lids to ensure

no material was lost. The core was then transported to a secondary facility at Summit Creek Cabins, near

Hazell, AB where it was stored in a -15°C freezer until ready for sampling. In 2018, each distinct coal

seam comprised one sample and in 2019 the sample intervals were selected based on the downhole

geophysical logs of the LDC drillholes. Roof and floor dilution samples were also collected at the

beginning and end of each coal seam.

A total of 59 samples were collected from 16 LDC drillholes (Table 9-3). No LDC coring was completed

historically. Coal was not sampled from LDC drillhole TM19-035LDC due to the coal seam being

intersection by a fault and concerns the results would not represent the true coal quality. The sampling

procedures varied slightly between the 2018 and 2019 large diameter drill programs and are outlined in

detail in section 10.1 of this report. Approximately 1 m to 1.5 m segments of coal were placed in pre-

labelled sample bags, with one sample often comprising multiple bags of coal. Each bag was tagged, zip

tied, double bagged and zip tied again to ensure no material was lost. The samples were then placed in


secure, cold storage at Summit Creek Cabins, near Hazell, Alberta, until being shipped to the selected

laboratory. In 2018, samples were transported by a Montem employee using a truck and trailer to Birtley

Coal & Mineral Testing (“Birtley”) in Calgary, Alberta. In 2019, samples were shipped in 50-gallon plastic

rain barrels by DHL ground and air to ALS Coal Services’ laboratory in Richlands, Queensland, Australia.

Table 9-3 2018 and 2019 Large Diameter Core Coal Sample Summary

Drillhole ID Sample Number Seam

ID Seam Ply

Thickness (m)

From (m)

To (m) Recovery

(%)

TM19-027LDC TM027-006 S7 S7 0.65 68.74 69.39 89

TM19-027LDC TM027-002 S7 S7 0.73 65.64 66.37 66

TM19-027LDC TM027-004 S7 S7 1.04 66.88 67.92 100

TM19-027LCDB_05 6UROOF - 6U Roof 0.2 57.66 57.86 100

TM19-027LCD_052 6UFLOOR - 6U Floor 0.2 75.72 75.92 100

TM19-027LCD_052 6LROOF - 6L Roof 0.19 72.97 73.16 100

TM19-027LCD_052 6LFLOOR - 6L Floor 0.2 84.59 84.79 100

TM19-027LCD 7FLOOR S7 S7 0.2 69.39 69.59 100

TM19-027LCD 7ROOF S7 S7 0.2 65.44 65.64 100

TM19-027LDC TM027-003 S7 S7 0.51 66.37 66.88 100

TM19-027LDC TM027-005 S7 S7 0.82 67.92 68.74 79

TM19-027LDC TM027-008 S6 S6U-S6M 7.57 88.12 95.69 68

TM19-027LDCB TM027B-002 S6 S6U-S6M 4.48 88.22 92.7 90

TM19-045LDCB TM045B-002 S6 S6U-S6M 8.75 22.62 31.37 67

TM19-045LDC TM045-002 S6 S6U 5.92 26.5 32.42 61

TM19-052LDC TM052-002 S6 S6U 2.46 94.1 96.56 100

TM19-052LDC TM052-004_005 S6 S6M-S6L 5.99 99.59 105.58 97

TM19-045LDC TM045-005_006 S6 S6M 2.44 33.81 36.25 86

TM19-027LDC TM027-011 S6 S6L 0.71 96.73 97.44 100

TM19-027LDCB TM027B-005 S6 S6L 2.04 93.65 95.69 100

TM19-045LDCB TM045B-005 S6 S6L 0.84 33.01 33.85 76

TM19-052LDC TM052-008 S6 S6L 2.75 108.62 111.37 100

TM19-028LCD_029 2ROOF - 2 Roof 0.2 109.75 109.95 100

TM18-0013LDCA TM013-001 S5 S5U 5.28 44 49.28 59

TM19-020LDC TM020-001 S5 S5U 2.85 45.1 47.95 96

TM19-022LDC TM022-002 S5 S5U 5.78 94.79 100.57 93

TM19-024LDC TM024-002 S5 S5U 4.41 41.64 46.05 100

TM19-024LDC TM024-003 S5 S5U 1.2 46.05 47.25 100

TM19-022LDC TM022-005 S5 S5M 2.77 108.32 111.09 93

TM19-020LDC TM020-002 S5 S5L 2.01 47.51 49.52 84

TM19-020LDC TM020-003 S5 S5L 2.99 49.63 52.62 100

TM19-022LCD_024 5_5MROOF - 5M Roof 0.2 81 81.2 100

TM18-0013LDCA TM013-002 S5 S5L 0.15 49.28 49.43 100

TM19-040LDC TM040-002 S4 S4U 3.91 18.03 21.94 95

TM19-048LDC TM048-002 S4 S4U 3.35 12.86 16.21 36

TM19-050LDC TM050-002 S4 S4U 2.43 43.16 45.59 100

TM19-040LDC TM040-004 S4 S4M 6.24 26.95 33.19 100

TM19-048LDC TM048-004 S4 S4L 1.59 16.84 18.43 100

TM18-0012 LDC TM012-002 S4 S4 3.81 51.6 55.41 59

TM19-020LCD_024 5_5MFLOOR - 5M Floor 0.2 77.69 77.89 100

TM18-0012 LDC TM012-001 S4 S4U 0.1 51.5 51.6 100


Drillhole ID Sample Number Seam

ID Seam Ply

Thickness (m)

From (m)

To (m) Recovery

(%)

TM18-004LDC TM004-002_1 S4 S4U 0.86 63.14 64 100

TM18-004LDC TM004-002_2 S4 S4U 0.86 64 64.86 100

TM18-004LDC TM004-003_1-3 S4 S4U 2 65.86 67.86 100

TM18-004LDC TM004-003_4 S4 S4U 0.54 67.86 68.4 100

TM18-004LDC TM004-008_1-5 S4 S4L 2.82 75.18 78 100

TM18-004LDC TM004-008_5 S4 S4L 0.68 78 78.68 100

TM19-040LCD_050 4ROOF - 4 Roof 0.2 24.48 24.68 100

TM19-040LCD_050 4FLOOR - 4 Floor 0.2 32.4 32.6 100

TM18-004LDC TM004-006 S4 S4L 0.3 74.12 74.42 100

TM18-0012 LDC TM012-003 S4 S4 0.1 55.41 55.51 100

TM19-040LDC TM040-003 S4 S4 5.01 21.94 26.95 100

TM19-048LDC TM048-003 S4 S4 0.63 16.21 16.84 100

TM19-028LDC TM028-001 S2 S2U 6.57 61.22 67.79 91

TM19-029LDC TM029-002 S2 S2U 7.07 128.88 135.95 93

TM19-028LDC TM028-004_005 S2 S2L 7.72 70.73 78.45 95

TM19-029LDC TM029-005 S2 S2L 6.22 139.75 145.97 100

TM19-029LCD 2FLOOR - 2 Floor 0.2 140.96 141.16 100

TM19-028LDC TM028-003 S2 S2 2.94 67.79 70.73 91

9.4 HQ DIAMOND DRILLING

A total of 10 HQ drillholes were drilled in 2018 and 2019, totaling 1,965 m (Table 9-2). The primary

purpose of the HQ diamond drillholes was geotechnical and geochemical analysis, as well as confirmation

of historical drillhole results and resource definition. No coal samples were collected for coal quality

analysis as recovery was poor and a significant portion of the remaining coal was required for

geotechnical and geochemical analysis.

Prior to the start of drilling, the HQ drill rigs were oriented using an Azimuth Positioning System II (APS

II). Drillholes were cased with HW surface casing, which was left in place following completion of the

drillhole.

9.4.1 2018 HQ GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOCHEMICAL SAMPLING PROGRAM

HQ drill core from the 3 drillholes drilled in 2018 was placed in boxes and transported via truck at the

end of each shift to the core processing facility at the program’s laydown yard. Here, the core was

geologically and geotechnically logged and photographed (wet and dry) by Dahrouge geologists. The core

was then stacked on pallets and stored in a secure sea-can until early 2019 when a follow-up geotechnical

and geochemical sampling program of this core was carried out by a geotechnical engineer and

hydrogeochemist from SRK Consulting Ltd. (“SRK”) of Vancouver, BC, and Dahrouge geologists. The

geochemical sampling consisted of collecting continuous core samples for acid rock drainage analysis.

The core was placed in pre-labelled sample bags of varying intervals dependent upon lithology and

proximity to potentially economic coal seams. The samples were shipped to Maxxam Analytics in

Burnaby, BC for analysis. The geotechnical analysis consisted of detailed geotechnical logging of the three

HQ drillholes by the SRK engineer as well as collecting samples for laboratory unconfined compressive

strength (UCS), triaxial strength and direct-shear testing. The samples selected by the engineer were

bubble wrapped for protection, placed in core boxes and shipped to Golder Associates Laboratory in

Burnaby, BC for analysis. Point load testing was also completed by a Dahrouge geologist on all three


drillholes at 3 m intervals, with more concentrated testing where a geotechnical sample was collected.

Table 9-4 outlines the samples collected and testing performed.

Table 9-4 2018 HQ Core Geochemical and Geotechnical Samples

Drillhole ID Geochemical

Samples

Geotechnical Samples Point Load Test

UCS/Triaxial Direct Shear Diametral Axial

TM18-001 31 18 8 87 19

TM18-005 53 29 14 171 47

TM18-014 23 17 7 78 28

9.4.2 2019 HQ GEOTECHNICAL, HYDROGEOLOGICAL AND GEOCHEMICAL PROGRAM

In 2019, a geologist was stationed at the drill site in a mobile logging facility. A triple tube set up was

used and the core was immediately geologically logged, geotechnically logged and photographed within

the split tube before being placed in core boxes. The geotechnical logging was performed by Dahrouge

geologists under the training and protocols of SRK. Samples for unconfined compressive strength were

collected approximately every 30 m and direct shear samples were collected when a suitable fracture

surface was identified in the core. The samples were bubbled wrapped for protection and sent to Golder

Associates Laboratory in Burnaby, BC for analysis following completion of the program. The boxed core

was transported via 4x4 truck following completion of the drillhole and stacked on pallets and stored at

the site’s laydown yard. Point-load testing was performed on the core from all drillholes at intervals of

3m, at distinct lithology changes and in higher concentrations around locations where geotechnical

samples were collected.

Packer tests were performed at regular intervals on 5 of the drillholes to test the hydrogeological

properties of the bedrock; these tests were carried out by the onsite SRK geologist. A packer test uses

inflatable bladders to isolate a defined section downhole. Water is then pumped down the drillhole at a

known flow rate and the pressure is recorded in order to determine the hydraulic conductivity of the

bedrock. Different rock types and geologic structures identified from the core were targeted for packer

testing. A total of 19 packer tests over 5 drillholes were performed. Results collected from these packer

tests will be used to evaluate the hydrogeological impacts on geotechnical pit stability.

Additionally, a geochemical sampling program was carried out by a hydrogeochemist from SRK. The

program consisted of continuous sampling of HQ core to address data gaps from the 2018 geochemical

sampling, including increased spatial distribution. The core was bagged and sent to Maxxam Analytics

and select samples were chosen for static testing (acid base accounting and elemental composition)

followed by a subset of samples submitted for phase 2 testing based on the initial results (shake flake

extractions and kinetic testing). Table 9-5 outlines samples collected, and testing performed during the

2019 HQ drill program. The data collected is intended for additional technical studies by Montem.


Table 9-5 2019 HQ Geotechnical, Geochemical and Hydrogeological Program Summary

Drillhole ID Geochemical

Samples

Geotechnical Samples Point Load Test Packer Tests UCS/Triaxial Direct Shear Diametral Axial

TM19-038 38 - - - - -

TM19-043 70 2 - 48 21 -

TM19-049 44 8 12 190 23 3

TM19-051 12 8 12 189 31 4

TM19-053 - 6 2 108 23 4

TM19-055 64 5 - 158 56 4

TM19-058 56 6 4 106 63 3

9.5 COLLAR SURVEYS

All drillhole locations were initially surveyed with a Garmin handheld GPS. Handheld GPSs have a

horizontal accuracy of ±3m, but a poor elevation accuracy of 10-20 m. As such, final survey was

completed on each drillhole using a Topcon RTK.

• A Topcon RTK survey consists of two components, a Base station and a Roving Unit. The Base

station is set up at a static location and continuously tracks the location data of four or more

satellites which are stored in its memory. The Base station communicates in real time with the

Roving unit with a measurement collected from the Roving unit at each point of interest. This

allows an immediate baseline analysis to be completed and allows location results to be

displayed with an accuracy of ±10 mm horizontally, and ±15 mm vertically

The Topcon was used to survey drillholes once drilling was completed and the drill was moved off the

site. The carbon fiber range pole was placed as close as possible to the point where the casing intercepted

surface and was then levelled using the leveling bubble. A ‘Topo’ type point was selected and labeled with

the drillhole name. A coordinate measurement was taken as long as the receiver was in communication

with the base station. This was important to ensure maximum precision and accuracy (of ±10 mm

horizontally, and ±15 mm vertically). At the end of the collar survey, another measurement at the control

point was taken as a final check, prior to turning off and packing up the Topcon.

9.6 DOWNHOLE SURVEYS

In 2018, the downhole deviation, geophysical and acoustic televiewer (ATV) surveys were performed by

Century Wireline Services (“Century Wireline”), of Red Deer, Alberta, Canada. In 2019 downhole

deviation, geophysical, ATV, OTV (optical televiewer) and full wave Sonic surveys were performed by

DGI Geoscience Inc. (“DGI”), of Toronto, Ontario. Some drillholes were not surveyed due to proximity to

pilot drillholes, blockages or lack of bedrock. Table 9-2 outlines the downhole surveys completed on 2018

and 2019 drillholes.

9.6.1 FRACTURE AND BEDDING ORIENTATION MEASUREMENTS – DIPMETER

Downhole semi-accurate formation bedding and fracture orientation measurements were collected

using a dipmeter tool, from nine 2018 drillholes and ten 2019 drillholes. A dipmeter tool is a probe with

built-in inclinometer and magnetometer sensors for determining drillhole orientation, and with caliper

arms for measuring microresistivity of formations. For the dipmeter tool to function properly it requires

water in the drillhole. Information collected from the dipmeter was validated and compiled into an

orientation database that was used as a reference for geological unit and structural orientations.


9.6.2 ACOUSTIC TELEVIEWER (“ATV”) SURVEYS

The ATV is a downhole survey tool with a fixed acoustic transducer and rotating acoustic mirror that

scans the drillhole walls with a focused ultrasound beam. It provides a continuous high-resolution

ultrasound image of the drillhole and allows measurement of fracture features including diameter

changes, pervasiveness and orientation. Fluid is required within the drillhole to complete an ATV survey;

results from an ATV survey are used for downstream geotechnical mine design and rock characterization.

In 2018, one drillhole was successfully surveyed with high-resolution ATV. In 2019, low-resolution ATV

surveys were completed on 53 drillholes, and high-resolution ATV surveys were completed on 13

drillholes, below the water table. These 13 drillholes were selected by the SRK geotechnical engineer.

9.6.3 OPTICAL TELEVIEWER (“OTV”) SURVEYS

The OTV survey uses a probe mounted with cameras to collect an oriented 360° image of the drillhole

wall and it allows for the identification of structural features. No fluid is required within a drillhole to

complete an OTV survey. No OTV surveys were conducted in 2018. In 2019, DGI conducted OTV surveys

on the 13 drillholes with high-resolution ATV surveys. The OTV surveys were done on drillholes that

required detailed geotechnical investigation above the water table.

9.6.4 FULL WAVE SONIC (“SONIC”) SURVEY

Full wave sonic downhole surveys emit a high energy source wave into the surrounding bedrock and

measure the different frequencies generated within a formation, allowing for analysis of full waveform

(compressional, shear and Stoneley waves). DGI conducted Sonic surveys on the 13 drillholes surveyed

with high-resolution ATV and OTV.

9.7 MONITORING WELL INSTALLATION & VIBRATING WIRE PIEZOMETER INSTALLATION

A total of 5 monitoring wells and 2 vibrating wire piezometer installations were completed by Matrix

Solutions Inc., based out of Calgary, Alberta.

Around Pit Lake 4, two monitoring wells were installed in TM18-012 and TM18-015, and two vibrating

wire piezometers were installed in TM19-026 (to test varying depths) and one vibrating wire piezometer

was installed in TM19-054. The objective of the two monitoring wells was to get a baseline measurement

for the relationship between the Pit 4 Lake and the subsurface water properties and the surrounding

watersheds. The objective of the piezometers is to test the hydrogeological properties and interaction

between the Pit 4 Lake and the nearby bedrock.

One monitoring well was installed near the Pit 2 Lake, in TM19-040LDC and 4 other monitoring wells

were installed in the valley to the northwest of the mine site. The objective of these monitoring wells was

to get a baseline measurement on the relationship between the mine site, subsurface water properties

and the surrounding watersheds.

Results collected from the monitoring wells and vibrating wire piezometers will be used to aid additional

test work and evaluate the hydrogeological impacts on geotechnical pit stability.

9.8 SURFICIAL SOIL GEOTECHNICAL DRILLING AND TEST PITTING PROGRAM

In 2019, a surficial soil geotechnical drilling and test pitting program was completed on and nearby the

Property. The focus of the program was to test the geotechnical and hydrogeological properties of the

surficial soil in the areas of proposed mine infrastructure and mine dump. The program included the


excavation of 16 soil test pits in the area of the planned infrastructure and mine haul road; Drilling of 14

drillholes to test the geotechnical properties of surficial soil for the planned mine dump, infrastructure

and rail loadouts; and installation of five monitoring wells to assess the groundwater levels in the area

of the planned mine dump.

9.8.1 SURFICIAL SOIL GEOTECHNICAL TEST PITS

Geotechnical test pits were excavated, in 2019, using a tracked 250 Kobelco Excavator provided by Wulf

Construction, of Blairmore, Alberta and overseen by Thurber Engineering Ltd (“Thurber”). The test pits

were excavated to a maximum depth of 5 m or until bedrock was encountered. The soil was described,

and samples were collected by Thurber at varying intervals and sent for laboratory analysis. Seven soil

test pits were excavated on the Property, while the remaining sites were located off-Property along the

planned haul road and stockpile area (Table 9-6).

Table 9-6 2019 Test Pit Locations

Test Pit ID Easting Northing Elevation (m)

SED-TP5 665973.9 5494447 1831

SED-TP3 665973.9 5494413 1829

SED-TP4 666015.3 5494426 1827

SED-TP24 665855.5 5494136 1820

SED-TP23 666230.9 5494283 1741

SED-TP22 666038.3 5494829 1708

SED-TP21 666425.9 5494345 1709

SED-TP20 666459.6 5495355 1606

SED-TP19 666316.8 5496315 1528

SED-TP18 666487.4 5497112 1529

SED-TP17 666347.5 5497866 1506

SED-TP16 666195.1 5498789 1480

SED-TP15 666032.4 5499794 1432

SED-TP14 666206.1 5500177 1368

SED-TP11 666148.5 5500181 1373

SED-TP10 665940.1 5500103 1381

9.8.2 SURFICIAL SOIL GEOTECHNICAL DRILLING

The 2019 surficial soil geotechnical drilling program was completed using a LS250 Mini Sonic drill rig

provided by Boart Longyear, of Calgary, Alberta and was managed by SRK and Thurber. A total of

fourteen drillholes were completed, totalling 277 m (Table 9-7). SRK managed the 9 drillholes completed

in the area of the planned mine dump, and Thurber managed the 3 drillholes completed in the area of the

planned processing plant as well as the 2 drillholes completed in the area of the proposed rail loadout.

The soil was logged, and samples were collected at regular intervals to be sent for laboratory analysis.

Samples collected by SRK were sent to Golder Laboratories in Burnaby BC, while the samples collected

by Thurber were sent to their own Laboratory in Calgary, Alberta. Standard penetration tests (SPT’s)

were performed at 1.5 m or 3 m intervals as the drillholes advanced. Shelby tube samples were also


collected at the discretion of the geotechnical engineer/geologist onsite. All drillholes were oriented

vertically.

Table 9-7 2019 Drillhole Locations

Drillhole ID Easting Northing Elevation (m)

Depth (m)

Location

TM19-BH01 665965.4 5494267 1842 7.62 planned loadout bin location TM19-BH02 665974.5 5494492 1831 7.62 planned processing plant location

TM19-BH03 665910.1 5494510 1785 7.31 planned processing plant location

TM19-BH04M 665161.5 5494563 1480 18.29 planned mine dump location


TM19-BH06 665108.8 5493665 1603 18.29 planned mine dump location







TM19-BH13 666445.4 5500318 1354 10.66 planned transfer station location

TM19-BH14 666441.4 5500797 1351 15.24 planned rail loadout location

A total of 5 monitoring wells were installed in the geotechnical drillholes completed by SRK. The objective

of these monitoring wells was to assess the depth to groundwater in the planned mine dump area. The

monitoring well installations were performed by Boart Longyear and overseen by SRK.

Monitoring wells were installed with 2” slotted and solid PVC pipe, backfilled with sand and bentonite,

and finished at surface with a steel monument. The screen depths were chosen by SRK based on

observations by the geologist as the drillhole was advanced. Water levels were recorded following the

installation of the monitoring wells (Table 9-8).

Table 9-8 2019 Potential Mine Dump Monitoring Well Locations and Water Levels

Drillhole ID Easting Northing Elevation (m)

top of PVC Pipe Stickup

(m)

Water Level

(mbgs)

Screened Interval (m)

TM19-BH04M 665161.5 5494563 1480 0.75 2.295 9.14 to 15.24 TM19-BH05M 664857.5 5494210 1542 0.73 29.325 24.38 to 33.53 TM19-BH07M 665044.8 5493867 1575 0.73 4.649 28.96 to 44.20 TM19-BH08M 664622.9 5493636 1519 0.77 12.632 19.81 to 25.91 TM19-BH09M 664680.3 5493918 1495 0.75 NA 5.18 to 14.32

9.9 EXPLORATION SUMMARY

The historical data compilation located and compiled a total of 192 drillholes, including 119 core

drillholes and 73 rotary drillholes completed on or adjacent to the Property (Table 6-2). These were

drilled by Coleman Collieries between 1972 and 1977. Jordan (2017) completed a comprehensive review

of the historical drillhole locations to verify collar locations and convert drillhole location survey data

from the historical imperial coordinate system to the metric system (UTM NAD83 Zone 11). A

topographic LiDAR survey was carried out on behalf of Westmoreland in June 2017 and was used in the

current resource estimation. A total of 76 drillholes, totalling 8,784 m, were drilled for infill and resource

purposes between 2018 and 2019 on the Property (Table 9-1; Table 9-2; Figure 9-1). Drillhole types

included air rotary, 6” large diameter core, reverse circulation and HQ diamond drillholes. Drillhole


locations were based upon a drill plan created using the 2018 JORC resource model by Tamplin (2018).

All drillholes completed in 2018 and 2019 were incorporated into the 2019 geological model and 2019

JORC Resource Statement. Appendix 1 contain all included and excluded drillholes and coal intersections

used in the resource estimation.

The 2018 and 2019 exploration programs allowed for construction of an updated geological model for

the Property. The model incorporated data collected in 2018 and 2019 with historical data to update the

resource and geological interpretation of the Property using the methods described in section 13.1 and

13.2 of this report.

Table 9-9 provides a summary of the drillhole coal seam intersections and Table 9-10 displays all coal

intersections used in construction of the 3D seam model, including the historical, 2018 and 2019 drillhole

data. The drillhole seam intersections reflect the apparent thicknesses, based off all drillhole

intersections.

Table 9-9 Summary of Drillhole Coal Intersections

Seam ID # of Drillhole Intersections

Mean Thickness

(m)

Max. Seam

Thickness (m)

Min. Seam Thickness

(m)

Standard Deviation

(m)

Seam Lower

Quartile

Seam Upper

Quartile

S7 51 1.19 11.4 0.05 1.87 0.34 1

S6U 164 1.2 15 0.02 2.14 0.21 1.12

S6M 119 1.39 8.88 0.01 1.75 0.39 1.62

S6L 84 1.27 9 0.05 1.6 0.35 1.42

S5U 278 1.03 6.4 0.02 0.94 0.4 1.46

S5M 233 1.29 8.5 0.05 1.27 0.58 1.54

S5L 223 1.22 11.2 0.04 1.4 0.48 1.42

S4U 279 1.24 9.75 0.02 1.31 0.46 1.5

S4M 287 1.01 10.5 0.01 1.22 0.32 1.22

S4L 176 0.98 5.11 0.07 0.82 0.48 1.2

S3U 33 0.93 2.29 0.3 0.51 0.5 1.31

S3L 14 0.96 2.2 0.2 0.62 0.52 1.5

S2U 328 1.16 11.09 0.01 1.32 0.4 1.38

S2L 231 1.45 16.03 0.01 1.91 0.4 1.66

Coal intersections reflect apparent thickness. Includes historical, 2018 and 2019 drilling.

Table 9-10 Drillhole Coal Intersections

(See Appendix 1)


10 SAMPLE PREPARATION, ANALYSES AND SECURITY

Dahrouge completed a compilation and review of the available historical coal sample procedures and

analytical work. Information concerning sampling procedures and sample security measures was

obtained from historical exploration reports prepared by the staff of Coleman Collieries or the

independent coal testing laboratories engaged to analyze the coal samples. No special sample security

measures were adopted for the programs because the industry regards coal as a low value bulk

commodity, the exploration samples for which do not require special or elaborate sample security

measures.

10.1 PRE-ANALYSIS SAMPLE PREPARATION AND QUALITY CONTROL

Coleman Collieries Ltd. Drill Core Sampling Procedure

Historical sampling was completed between 1972 and 1977, by Coleman Collieries or by their

contractors. The Authors have no direct knowledge of the core sampling methods undertaken by the site

crews. The industry standard methods reviewed in exploration reports match the standard procedures

used by Coleman Collieries at that time.

Cores were examined following retrieval and all field sub-samples were then sealed before being forwarded

to the laboratory for testing and analysis. Samples collected from drill core and cuttings were submitted for

analysis using methods that are standard for the coal industry. The specific process used is described below:

• Core from the drillhole was geologically logged (i.e. measured and described) using standard

descriptive terms to document rock type, color, brightness, hardness and grain size.

• Geophysical logs were run downhole to collect caliper, density (gamma-gamma), natural gamma

and resistivity trace. The geophysical logs are used to identify rock types, including coal intersected

in the drillhole.

• Coal intervals were collected in split inner tube sampling barrels. The core tubes were opened and

logged by a geologist. The geologist’s core log consisted of the measured thickness and description

of the coal, inter-seam partings, adjacent roof and floor rock, and details of any sample intervals

removed for analysis.

• Recovered core was measured to determine an overall recovery (reported in percent) by comparing

the recovered core length with the coring run length recorded by the driller. Recovered core was

measured and compared to the coal interval thickness determined from the geophysical log suite.

• Collected samples were cleaned of any mud contamination and placed in individual plastic bags.

The bags were labelled on the outside with both the core drillhole and sample number and sealed

with plastic tape to prevent excessive moisture loss. The sample bags were placed together in a

collection bag for the core drillhole before being placed in palletized containers and shipped to an

independent laboratory for analysis.

• No special security methods were identified for the shipping and storage of samples.


Coleman Collieries Ltd. Bulk Sampling Procedure

Historical bulk sampling was completed on the Property and used for coal quality determinations. The

bulk sample procedures for the adits are as follows:

• Representative samples were collected by driving adits into unoxidized material;

• Before bulk sampling, preliminary samples were obtained from various points in the adit and

evaluated for oxidation, using FSI testing;

• Adits were driven in coal, until unoxidized coal was reached, where a crosscut was driven from

hanging wall to footwall and a representative sample across the crosscut face was taken.

• If this yielded favorable results, a bulk sample that was deemed representative of the seam was

collected, sealed in barrels and shipped;

• Historical bulk samples were transported to the laboratory of Coal Science and Minerals Testing

(Birtley Labs), Calgary, Alberta;

• Bulk samples were collected from coal seams within the three adits driven on the Property

between 1975 and 1976: seam S2, seam S4, seam S5 and seam S6;

• Approximately four to five tons of raw coal was recovered from each seam in each adit;

• Analysis at the Coal Science and Minerals Testing laboratory was carried out between 1974 and

1979.

Montem Resources Ltd. Drill Core Sampling Procedure

In 2018 and 2019, a geologist was onsite to oversee the large diameter drill rig whenever coal was being

drilled. In 2018, core was removed from the core barrel directly into placed in plastic-lined 1.5 m wooden

core boxes for logging and photography by the onsite geologist. Each distinct coal interval, in addition to

the roof and floor dilution samples, were placed immediately into plastic bags with a sample number and

sealed. The interval and bag number were marked on the bag. Each coal interval was double bagged and

tightly sealed as a precaution. The site geologist transported the samples to the secured cold storage,

where samples were sealed in 50-gallon plastic barrels and stored inside a locked trailer. The samples

remained onsite until the laboratory notified Montem that they had the capacity to accept and analyse

them. Samples collected in 2018 were delivered by truck and trailer to Birtley Coal and Mineral Testing

Division of GWIL Industries Inc. (“Birtley”) in Calgary, Alberta, directly by a Montem employee.

In 2019, the drill rig utilized a split tube set up which altered the sampling and logging procedure. When

a run was completed, the spilt tubes were placed directly onto metal sawhorses and opened. The core

was photographed immediately and then carried in the split tubes to the mobile logging facility at the

drill site and photographed again. The split tube was then carefully tipped over into a 10” PVC trough

designed to accommodate the large diameter core. The core was logged in detail by the onsite geologist

and then transferred into plastic lined wooden core boxes. The boxes were sealed with plastic poly

sheeting and wooden lids, then transported by the site geologist to secured cold storage. Following

completion of the downhole geophysical surveys, a graphic log was produced in Strater logging software

using the density log and geological log. Figure 10-1 through Figure 10-5 show an example of the graphic

logs created for coal seams S2, S4, S5, S6, and S7. The depths of the coal intervals from the geological log

were adjusted based on the depths from the downhole density logs. If required, core loss was also

assigned to the depth-corrected logs. Sample intervals were then selected using the depth corrected


graphic logs for each distinct coal interval and roof and floor dilution samples. The core boxes were then

laid out and the intervals verified against the log. Dividers were placed at the beginning and end of each

sample. The samples were placed into pre-labeled plastic bags, with one sample often comprising more

than one bag. Each coal interval was double-bagged, with a waterproof label placed inside the bag and

stapled to the outside of the inner bag and inside of the outer bag. The bags were then weighed and placed

within labelled 50-gallon rain barrels. The barrels remained in cold storage until they were ready to be

shipped. For shipment, four barrels were palletized on heavy-duty pallets, shrink wrapped and secured

with steel banding.

Samples collected in 2019, were shipped by DHL ground to Calgary, Alberta, then flown to Brisbane,

Queensland, Australia by DHL air before being shipped to ALS Coal Services’ laboratory in Richlands by

DHL ground. A total of three shipments were completed in 2019 (Table 10-1).

Table 10-1 2019 Coal Sample Shipment Details

Shipment Number of Barrels Date Shipped Date Received at ALS

Brisbane

1 8 5-Jul-19 28-Jul-19

2 8 15-Jul-19 28-Jul-19

3 5 31-Jul-19 14-Aug-19

Figure 10-1 Graphic Log of Coal Seam S2 from TM19-028LDC and TM19-29LDC



Figure 10-5 Graphic Log of Coal Seam S7 from TM19-027LDC


10.2 LABORATORY SAMPLE PREPARATION

Historical Core Laboratory Procedures

The laboratory test work that was performed was completed by certified laboratories in Canada and the

US for coal testing work. These included Coal Science and Mineral Testing (a subsidiary of Birtley

Laboratories) and Warnock Hersey Professional Services Ltd., both located in Calgary, Alberta, and some

specialized testing of the froth flotation properties by Commercial and General Testing Company of the

U.S.A. All these laboratories followed or continue to follow ASTM standards, as required.

Birtley Laboratories are still in operation. As part of their current certification by the Coal Association of

Canada (CAC), there is an obligation to complete relevant round robin checks and other routine checking

procedures to ensure that they meet the required accuracy for each test. They have been part of these

tests since their inception; however, Birtley has advised they are unsure if this quality control check

applied in the 1970’s. As such, it is unclear if the laboratories involved in the historical Tent Mountain

analysis had a system of blind assaying as part of their quality control.

The sample preparation methods utilized for the historical samples were Industry Standard at the time.

Details of the sample preparation are not known other than the descriptions provided by the

laboratories. The laboratories that performed the historical exploration are all independent commercial

laboratories and are not connected in any corporate way to the previous owners. The quality control

procedures employed by the laboratories were, in the past, and have remained the standard for the coal

industry in Canada. All Canadian coal laboratories are subject to periodic testing and certification by an

agency of the Canadian Federal Government.

Based on information extracted from “Warnock Hersey Professional Services Ltd., Coleman Collieries Ltd.

1975 report”, the below reported procedures were followed.

• The NQ/HQ testing protocol for the 1973-1977 cored exploration drillholes was comprehensive and

the testing procedure is summarized as follows (1975 Report of analysis of Diamond Drill Cores):

o Each of the cores was rinsed free of drilling mud and removed according to the footage

interval.

o After drying, the cores were broken by hand to 3/4” top size for large samples, and ¼” top

size for smaller samples.

o The material was screened at ¾”, ¼”, minus 28 mesh and 100 mesh, and the weight %

obtained.

o The plus 100 mesh size fractions were separated at the following specific gravities: 1.35,

1.40, 1.45, 1.50, 1.60, and 1.90. Some designated cores were tested at a lesser number of

gravities.

o The minus 28 mesh and minus 100 mesh fractions were subjected to froth floatation tests.

Froth concentrates were collected at 1 minute and 2 minute intervals. The conditions for

the tests were standardized at:

▪ 1740 r.p.m.

▪ 10% solids concentration

▪ 0.5lb/ton reagent dosage (3:1 diesel fuel/MIBC)

▪ 1 minute conditioning time

o Ash (%) and FSI was determined on all gravity fractions except the 1.90 sink (ash only).

Head samples were withdrawn at each stage and checked against composite of float

fractions.


o Composites were prepared from individual 60 mesh pulps to correspond to a clean coal

ash level of either 9% or 11%. These were analyzed for proximate including FSI, Sulphur,

and Btu.

Historical Bulk Sample Laboratory Procedures

Bulk samples from the adits were cleaned using a pilot-scale wash plant operation at the laboratory. The

primary purpose of the pilot-scale plant was to meet demands for quantity and quality of clean coal. The

wash plant was comprised of a commercial-type heavy medium cyclone and froth flotation plant. The

coarse raw coal was crushed to ¾” square (1” round) for feed to the 14” diameter dense medium cyclone.

The fines (minus 28 mesh-Tyler) were cleaned by froth flotation processes. The bulk samples were fed

into the plant in 45-gallon steel drums following pre-treatment. Products of separation were collected in

similar containers color-coded to designate clean coal and rejects. Incremental samples of all products

were taken during the test run at frequent intervals and continuous checks of suspension gravity were

made throughout the operating period. The reagents used in the flotation section of the plant were

standard mixtures of M.I.B.C., kerosene and fuel oil (Jordan, 2017).

All samples were subjected to detailed sizing, float-sink and froth flotation testing with proximate

analysis, sulphur, BTU and FSI analysis performed on most raw size fractions. Eastern Coal in

Pennsylvania also conducted coking tests on cleaned samples for seams S4, S5 and S6, including bulk

physical tests (screen analysis, tumbler tests and JIS drum tests) and bench scale analysis consisting of

Proximate Analysis, Sulphur, FSI, Geisler Plastometer, Audibert-Arnu and Hoffman Dilatometer and Sole

Heated Oven Testing.

2018 Core Laboratory Procedures

Montem collected and securely shipped core samples, to Birtley Laboratory Calgary, Alberta where the

samples were weighed and air-dried. Prior to crushing, an apparent relative density determination was

made to aid in determining recovery and composite choices. Samples were then crushed to pass minus

12.5 mm if required and screened to ±0.25 mm. Subsamples of ¼ or less, depending upon mass, were

taken and a raw coal head sample was assayed for proximate analysis, sulphur, FSI (free swelling index)

and LT% (light transmittance) to determine level of oxidation.

Birtley prepared and shipped 4 petrographic samples to be analyzed by David Pearson and Associates

(Pearson) in Victoria, BC, for reflectance and maceral composition.

2019 Core Laboratory Procedures

Montem collected and submitted 2019 core samples to ALS Coal Services in Richlands, Australia.

Sampling procedures followed by ALS were in accordance with AS2617 (seams, insitu), AS4264.1

Sampling Procedures and AS4264.4 Determination of Precision and Bias. Sample analyses was under the

direction of Montem’s independent coal quality consultant, A&B Mylec Pty Ltd (A&B Mylec), and outlined

below:

• Weigh and record mass as received

• Air-dry, re-weigh and record air dried mass

• Determine ARD

• Combine plies as instructed by A&B Mylec

• Record Starting Mass

• Drop Shatter (20 times from 2.0m) - Dry size sample at 31.5mm, record masses of +31.5 mm

and-31.5 mm

• Hand Knap - +31.5 mm material to pass 31.5 mm


• Record starting mass and proportional losses to date

• Dry Size @ 25.0, 16.0, 8.0, 4.0, 2.0, 1.0mm

• Combine all size fractions and weigh

• Wet Tumble with steel cubes for 5 minutes (18 cubes, 150 L water/50 kg sample)

• Wet Size @ 25.0, 16.0, 8.0, 4.0, 1.0, 0.500, 0.250 and 0.125 mm

• Record fractional masses and loss

• Calculate wet size distribution

• Validate on Rosin-Rammler and proceed with Coal and Dilution Washability Tests

Dilution Washability

• Recombine -31.5 +1 mm fractions

o Float/Sink @ 1.40, 1.60, 1.70 and 2.00 specific gravity

o Weigh and record fractional masses

o Rotary sample divide (RSD) each fraction

o Mill a portion and analyze for Ash

• Recombine -1 +0.250 mm fractions

o Float/Sink @ 1.40, 1.60, 1.70 and 2.00 specific gravity


o RSD each fraction


• Recombine -0.250 mm fractions


• Prepare a Raw Coal Composite from all float sink/flotation fractions and analyze for Relative

Density (RD), Proximate analysis, Total Sulfur (TS) and Calorific Value (CV)

• Report Results

Coal Washability

• Recombine -31.5 +1 mm fractions

o Float/Sink @ 1.30, 1.35, 1.40, 1,45, 1.50, 1.60, 1.65, 1.70, 1.80 and 2.00 specific gravity


o RSD each fraction


• Recombine -1 +0.250 mm fractions

o Float/Sink @ 1.30, 1.35, 1.40, 1,45, 1.50, 1.60, 1.65, 1.70, 1.80 and 2.00 specific gravity


o RSD each fraction


• Recombine -0.250 mm fractions

o Complete Froth Flotation Analysis on combined -0.250 mm fractions

• Prepare a Raw Coal Composite from all float sink/flotation fractions and analyze for Relative

Density (RD), Proximate analysis, Total Sulfur (TS), Calorific Value (CV) and Free Swelling

Index (FSI)

• Report Results

• Reserve all remaining material for clean coal composites

Clean Coal Composite Analysis:


Clean coal composites (CCC) for each intersected coal seam were generated by selecting fractions from

the washability and froth flotation analysis to create a simulated CCC targeting an ash content, depending

on the coal seam, in the range of 8.3% ‐ 13.0% (adb). The analysis performed on the clean coal composites

varied dependent on the intersected coal seam but included some, if not all, of the below listed tests:

• Proximate Analysis

• Total Sulfur

• Forms of Sulfur

• Phosphorus

• Calorific Value (GCV)

• Free Swelling Index

• Ultimate Analysis

• Ash Composition Analysis

• Fluorine

• Gieseler Plastometer

• Dilatometer

• Sapoznikov

• Gray King Coke Test

• Micum Drum Test

• CSR and CSI Analysis

• Petrographics

• Trace Elements

• Hardgrove Grindability Index

• Ash Fusion

10.3 QUALITY CONTROL AND QUALITY ASSURANCE

Laboratories used for coal analysis during the 2018 and 2019 coring programs have established industry

experience and accreditation. The 2018 program coal samples were analyzed by Birtley using ASTM

D2013, D3302, D3173, D3174, D3175, D4239, D720, D5263, D5515, D2639, D3682, D2795, and D4371

procedures. Birtley adheres to ASTM and ISO preparation and testing specifications and have quality

control processes in place. They have participated in the International Canadian Coal Laboratories Round

Robin Series (CANSPEX) since its inception. They are also part of the ISO Technical Committee for Canada

for TC27 and its associated subcommittees for coal preparation and coal testing.

The 2018 petrographic analysis was carried out by Pearson Coal Petrography; Pearson has provided

services in Victoria since 1981. They operate to ISO standards, undertake routine calibration of

photometers and potentiometers, and employ two methods of vitrinite reflectance as a means of quality

assurance. They also perform a monthly internal round robin check between their three labs worldwide.

Vitrinite reflectance was employed in part to provide an independent valuation of coal rank.

2019 coal samples were analyzed by ALS Coal Services’ laboratory in Richlands, Queensland using

accredited tests AS1038.3, AS1038.6.4, AS1038.12.1, AS1038.12.2, AS1038.12.4.1, AS1038.20,

AS1038.6.4, AS1038.6.4, AS1038.16, BS1016.14, AS1038.21.1.1, AS3881, AS1038.5, AS1038.1,

AS1038.6.3.3, AS1038.3, AS 1038.14.3, AS1038.10.4 and non-accredited tests AS2519 and AS1038.22.

Sampling by ALS is done in accordance with AS2617 (seams, in-situ), AS4264.1 Sampling Procedures and

AS4264.4 Determination of Precision and Bias. Acceptance and reporting of results by ALS is done in

accordance with AS1038.16. ALS is regularly audited by external auditors against ISO – 17025 standards.

Birtley, Pearson and ALS are commercial laboratories and are independent of the issuer.


11 DATA VERIFICATION

This report is a compilation and evaluation of data sourced from historical exploration programs at Tent

Mountain in combination with data sourced from the 2018 and 2019 exploration programs. The Authors

of this report have relied on the professional quality of the historical data compilation work, including

reviews of this historical work: 2018 JORC Compliant Resource Statement, an Internal 2005 NI 43-101

Technical Report, an internal 2017 NI 43-101 Technical Report and several historical technical reports

produced by Coleman Collieries over the lifespan of the mine.

Mr. Bradley Ulry visited the Property June 25th to 28th, July 6th to 12th, 2019 and September 12th to 13th,

2019. Mr. John Gorham visited the Property on December 5th and December 12th to 13th, 2018, and

provided some management direction throughout the drill program between December 5th to 22nd, 2018.

Mr. Matthew Carter did not visit the Property.

The resource estimates which form part of this report were based on the 2018 and 2019 drilling, as well

as historical drilling, select trenching data, adit data, and geological mapping data. Dahrouge completed

a 100% validation of the 2018-2019 work; a 100% validation of historical drillhole locations; and an

approximate 75% spot check of coal seam intersections, creating an independent database. The data sets,

including analytical data, are incomplete in some instances, and analytical certificates and details of

QA/QC programs were not necessarily included in the historical summary reports. In 2018 Montem

acquired additional data for 43 drillholes from the Alberta Energy Regulators (AER); this data was not

included in previous Resource Estimates.

Drillholes were qualified using a reliability indicator classification system, from 1-3. The reliability was

based on the quantity and quality of data available and the known accuracy of each collar location.

• Reliability of 1 was assigned to drillholes from 2018 and 2019 that had collar surveys using the

Topcon RTK system, geological logs, downhole geophysical logs and downhole deviation

surveys.

• Reliability of 2 was assigned to drillholes (dominantly historical) that had geophysical logs and

geological logs but lacked digital collar and downhole deviation surveys.

• Reliability of 3 was assigned to drillholes (historical) that only had data from one of the

geological logs or geophysical logs, and that lack collar and downhole deviation surveys.

Table 11-1 2019 Drillhole Reliability Classification Summary

Reliability Total Drillholes (RC + DDH+ Trenches)

1 73

2 136

3 51

Excluded 36

Not all data addressed in the historical summary reports and technical reports could be located by

Dahrouge, and therefore, could not be used in this report. A summary of the 2019 modelled drillholes

and excluded drillholes are shown in Table 11-2 and Table 11-3, respectively. The Authors have reviewed

the data for consistency between the different projects and companies and eliminated data that could

not be constrained or confirmed in reports or government databases. The Authors have concluded that

work completed by the coal production and exploration companies was conducted in a professional

manner that was consistent with the data collection and reporting standards at that time.


Table 11-2 2019 Modelled Drillholes

(See Appendix 1)

Table 11-3 2019 Excluded Drillholes

(See Appendix 1)

Dahrouge and A&B Mylec completed a data compilation and validation of the drillhole coal quality data.

In evaluating the historical coal quality data, A&B Mylec focused on the historical coal washability data

and used the following criteria to select a total of 28 valid historical representative samples to include in

the washability database along with the 2018 and 2019 washability samples:

• The quality/usability of each datapoint was classified using a scale of 0 to 10, with a rating of 10

being the most reliable data.

o Pretreated data gets the highest ranking of 10.

o Crushed data with multiple size fraction washabilities & no other ambiguities around

sampling interval, dilution inclusion, location, seam ID, etc get a 6.

o Crushed data with known non-coal inclusions which are not too thick get a 5.

o Crushed samples with higher amounts of non-coal included get a 4.

o Those samples rated below 4 generally have a problem such as:

▪ Head ash anomalous when reconciled to the sampling log.

▪ Some key identifier missing such as seam or location.

▪ Potentially a ply not included in the analysis sample.

• A subset of datapoints was created from those given a rating of 5 to 10.

• Head ash from the by-size washability was calculated for the subset data.

• An ash-relative density regression was created from the subset datapoints that had both ash and

relative density data.

• The ash-relative density regression was used to populate missing relative density values.

Dahrouge compiled a raw ash database for creation of ash and relative density grids to be used within

the geological model and resource estimation. A total of 29 historical coal quality samples were utilized

in the ash and relative density grids, which were selected using the following criteria:

• The historical coal quality samples were depth corrected against geophysical logs

• The samples were required to have >80% sample/core recovery and <20% parting inclusion by

length to be included in the gridding process

• Dahrouge incorporated the washability samples selected by A&B Mylec and the 2018/2019 coal

quality data into the raw ash database


12 COAL QUALITY

Dahrouge has compiled and evaluated a comprehensive coal quality database for Tent Mountain that is

made up of historical cored drillholes (HQ and NQ), adits and bulk samples, as well as large diameter (6”)

cored drillholes completed in 2018 and 2019. These works are underpinned by, and are largely

consistent with, the earlier coal quality evaluation works of Leach (2016), Jordan (2017), Tamplin

(2018), and Cameron (2019). The data that makes up the Tent Mountain coal quality database is

discussed above in Section 11 of this report. A detailed review of coal quality has been made and

presented independently by AB Mylec (Cameron and Williams, 2020) in support of Montem’s ongoing

project studies. The 2018 and 2019 results are summarized in this section and presented with the

findings of the completed coal quality studies.

Coal recoveries in historical cored drillholes were poor to moderate ranging from a low of 40% to a high

of 100%, for the identified seam groups, with an average coal recovery of approximately 75%. This poor

HQ and NQ-diameter core coal recovery is typical of coals in the Rocky Mountain Front Ranges and places

coal quality estimates based purely on slim core drillhole data at risk. Montem addressed this risk with

the introduction of a 6” diameter drilling method during the 2018 and 2019 drilling campaigns, with the

resultant average recoveries improving to 87%.

All historical coal analyses were completed by certified laboratories in Canada and the US. These included

Coal Science and Mineral Testing (a subsidiary of Birtley Laboratories in Calgary), Warnock Hersey

Professional Services Ltd, also located in Calgary and some specialized testing of the froth floatation

properties by Commercial and General Testing Company of the US. For testing work that requires it, all

these laboratories used or continue to use the procedures of the A.S.T.M. The testing standards used by

Birtley in 2018 and ALS in 2019 are presented in Section 10 of this report.

12.1 RAW COAL QUALITY

The Tent Mountain raw coal quality database includes 59 coal seam intersections made up of 52

historical samples and 40 samples from the 2018 and 2019 drillholes. The resultant database appears to

have a valid range of data and exhibits sound regression relationships such as ash-cv, ash-rd and

washability-ash. The criteria for determining which datapoints are included in the raw coal quality

database are discussed above in Section 11 of this report. The procedures used for raw coal sample

preparation and analytical testing are provided above in Section 10. The raw coal quality database can

be found in Appendix 1.

Historically, most of the coal intervals were sampled on a full seam basis rather than a more detailed ply

basis that is now the standard for geological investigations. This resulted in the inclusion of thick

partings and inferior coal bands (up to 2m in thickness) in many of the thicker coal intersections. This

dilution of historical samples increased raw ash and constrained the ability to assess the variability of

coal quality within a seam. This issue was addressed during the 2018 and 2019 drilling campaigns when

coal seams were sampled on a ply basis, facilitating the assessment of in-seam coal quality variability.

Historically, raw coal drillhole samples were analysed for ash content, some samples were also analysed

for Proximate analysis (i.e., moisture %, ash %, volatiles %, fixed carbon %), total sulphur (S) %, relative

density (RD) and crucible swelling number (CSN).

In 2018 and 2019 all coal plies were analysed for the following parameters: Proximate analysis, S %,

calorific value (CV) and RD. In seam rock partings plus roof and floor rock samples were analysed for the

same parameters.


Coal seam raw coal quality and thicknesses vary considerably over the property due to the structurally

controlled variations in seam development and due to localized structural thickening. Much of the

historic open-cut mining at Tent Mountain has occurred in zones of structurally thickened coal. The raw

ash content of the coal seams varies from 12% to 43%, with the higher ash intersections occurring in the

structurally thickened zones.

Weighted average raw coal quality results for each coal seam are presented in Table 12-2

Table 12-1 Raw Coal Quality Grid Data

(See Appendix 1)

Table 12-2 Weighted Average Raw Coal Quality Properties by Seam - adb

Coal Seam Coal Seam

Intersections RD Moist % Ash % VM % FC % Sulphur %

S2 10 1.52 1.2 26.2 22.5 50.1 0.44

S4 22 1.52 0.8 26.3 22.2 50.6 0.43

S5 17 1.49 1.0 24.1 23.9 51.0 0.41

S6 6 1.44 1.5 18.4 25.4 54.8 0.47

S7 2 1.50 1.0 25.3 25.2 48.5 0.73

12.2 CLEAN COAL QUALITY

The procedures used for washability and CCC sample preparation and analytical testing are provided

above in Section 10.

Coal Washability

The Tent Mountain washability database, compiled by A&B Mylec, includes 66 washability samples that

are considered reliable following validation and analysis of the dataset by A&B Mylec (Cameron and

Williams, 2020; Table 12-3). The criteria for determining the reliability of the datapoints for inclusion in

the washability database are discussed above in Section 11 of this report.

Table 12-3 Tent Mountain Washability Database (Source A&B Mylec)

Hole No Ply

Code Thickness From To

Raw Ash (%ad)

ARD

TM19-020LDC 5 2.98 44.53 47.51 12.4 1.33 TM19-020LDC 5 2.01 47.51 49.52 34 1.66 TM19-020LDC 5 2.99 49.52 52.51 23 1.52 TM19-022LDC 5 6.17 94.17 100.34 23.5 1.41 TM19-022LDC 5 2.87 107.8 110.67 30.3 1.44 TM19-027LDC 7 0.73 65.64 66.37 17.9 1.36 TM19-027LDC 7 1.04 66.88 67.92 42.7 1.63 TM19-027LDC 7 0.65 68.74 69.39 15.5 1.33 TM19-027LDC 6 7.57 88.12 95.69 11.5 1.33 TM19-027LDC 6 0.71 96.73 97.44 38.9 1.64 TM19-028LDC 2 6.57 61.22 67.79 26.9 1.49 TM19-028LDC 2 7.72 70.73 78.45 25.7 1.44 TM19-045LDC 6 5.92 26.5 32.42 26.1 1.38 TM19-045LDC 6 2.44 33.81 36.25 25.8 1.43 TM19-024LDC 5 4.41 41.64 46.05 16.5 1.3 TM19-024LDC 5 1.2 46.05 47.25 45.7 1.88

TM19-027LDCB 6 4.48 88.22 92.7 14.4 1.39 TM19-027LDCB 6 2.04 93.65 95.69 34 1.58


Hole No Ply

Code Thickness From To

Raw Ash (%ad)

ARD

TM19-045LDCB 6 8.75 22.62 31.37 29.9 1.51 TM19-045LDCB 6 0.84 33.01 33.85 37.1 1.57 TM19-029LDC 2 7.07 128.88 135.95 41.4 1.83 TM19-029LDC 2 6.22 139.75 145.97 45.4 1.76 TM19-048LDC 4 3.35 12.86 16.21 36.5 1.67 TM19-048LDC 4 1.59 16.84 18.43 20.4 1.35 TM19-050LDC 4 2.43 43.16 45.59 21.4 1.41 TM19-040LDC 4 3.91 18.03 21.94 27.8 1.45 TM19-040LDC 4 6.24 26.95 33.19 21.2 1.46 TM19-052LDC 6 2.46 94.1 96.56 42.5 1.82 TM19-052LDC 6 6.19 99.39 105.58 13 1.35 TM19-052LDC 6 2.75 108.62 111.37 17.2 1.3 TM18-004LDC 4 0.86 63.14 64 26.4 1.56 TM18-004LDC 4 1.86 64 65.86 6 1.32 TM18-004LDC 4 2 65.86 67.86 21.8 1.48 TM18-004LDC 4 0.54 67.86 68.4 39.4 1.69 TM18-004LDC 4 2.82 75.18 78 19.3 1.47 TM18-004LDC 4 0.68 78 78.68 43.2 1.75

TM18-0012LDC 4 3.81 51.6 55.41 22.4 1.49 TM18-0013LDC(a) 5 5.28 44 49.28 21.5 1.46

TD74-6 4 2.28 189.74 192.02 22.8 1.4 TD73-1 5 3.96 439.52 443.48 34.2 1.53 TD74-9 5 2.75 62.48 65.23 26.8 1.44 TD74-9 4 3.36 163.98 167.34 24.7 1.42

TD74-17 5 4.27 499.87 504.14 36.7 1.57 TD74-10 4 2.75 172.82 175.57 22.4 1.4 TD74-6 4 4.58 192.02 196.6 27.9 1.46 TD74-9 5 3.2 65.23 68.43 15.7 1.35 TD74-9 5 2.59 106.38 108.97 15.5 1.35 TD74-9 5 4.42 108.97 113.39 29.7 1.48

TD74-16 4 3.35 157.58 160.93 20.3 1.38 TD74-17 4 4.88 551.69 556.57 22.7 1.4 TD74-16 4 3.42 160.93 164.35 22.4 1.4 TD74-17 6 4.42 367.89 372.31 16.6 1.36 TD74-8 4 3.05 279.2 282.25 20.8 1.39 TD74-8 4 3.04 282.25 285.29 19.4 1.38 TD73-4 4 2.74 99.67 102.41 27.2 1.45

TD75-50 4 5.4 117.74 123.14 18 1.37 TD75-50 5 8.84 46.48 55.32 25.6 1.43 TD75-48 4 7.59 154.56 162.15 23.7 1.41 TD75-48 5 18.62 51.18 69.8 20 1.38 TD75-82 4 10.21 95.86 106.07 24.4 1.42 TD75-34 6 3.96 210.01 213.97 12.8 1.33 TD75-35 4 4.14 470.92 475.06 32.1 1.51 TD76-98 4 5.94 33.59 39.53 38.3 1.59 TD76-98 4 6.86 48.25 55.11 34.3 1.54 TD75-47 5 12.89 47.58 60.47 24.7 1.42 TD74-10 4 1.52 175.57 177.09 25.4 1.43

Ash yield curves, for each coal seam, generated using the Tent Mountain washability database are

presented below in Figure 12-1. Ash yield curves are a useful method for understanding the washability

profile of a resource by examining and simulating the behaviour of individual datapoints through the full


range of DMC (Dense Medium Cyclone) cut-points on a dilution-free basis. The simulated ash and yield

outcomes are then plotted to facilitate an understanding of:

• The quality variability within a seam group.

• The “natural” product ash of the seam.

• The presence of near-gravity material and hence ease of washing of the seam.

Figure 12-1 Tent Mountain Ash Yield Curves by Seam (Source A&B Mylec)

Clean Coal Composites (CCC)

The Tent Mountain coals are considered a Medium Volatile Bituminous coal under ASTM standards, that

could be marketed as a semi-hard to hard coking coal (HCC) (Cameron and Williams, 2019 & 2020).

Washability analysis demonstrates a clean product in the 8.30-13.10% ash range. Generally, the product

coal is likely to be moderate in sulphur (~0.40-0.70) and phosphorus (<0.090) and exhibit CSN results of

approximately 5-7 (Cameron and Williams, 2020).

The CCC for Tent Mountain is based on a relatively limited dataset that is largely derived from samples

generated during the 2018 and 2019 exploration programs. The data is produced for each sample at a

simulated specific gravity targeting an individual ash content of 8.3% ‐ 13.0% (adb), with an overall

Project-wide ash target of 9.0 - 10.5%. The specific gravity selected varies for each sample based upon

the aim of optimizing both yield and product rheological properties. Various analytical results obtained

from the 2018 and 2019 CCCs are summarized in Table 12-4.

SEAM_4SEAM_5

SEAM_6

SEAM_7

SEAM_2

25.0

35.0

45.0

55.0

65.0

75.0

85.0

4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 22.0

Yie

ld (%

Fe

ed

TM

)

Product Ash (%ad)

Tent Mountain 2018,2019 Borecore Ash_Yield Curves by Seam

SEAM_4

SEAM_5

SEAM_6

SEAM_7

SEAM_2


Table 12-4 Tent Mountain Clean Coal Composite Results

Seam ID

Drillhole Yield

%

Moist %

Ash %

VM %

S %

CV kcal/kg

%P in

Coal CSN RoMax Max

Fluidity DDPM

Dilatation %

(adb)

S7 TM027-002+004+006 57 1.3 10.1 30.2 0.88 7558 0.217 8 1.01 1190 56

S6

TM027-008+TM027-011 87.7 1.8 8.7 26.3 0.31 7560 0.105 5 1.06 5 -21

TM045-002+005+006 73.3 1.6 8.3 29.9 0.74 7668 0.057 7 1 745 37

TM027B-002+005 76.7 1.9 9.3 27.1 0.37 7514 0.074 7 1.06 15 -16

TM045B-002+005 68.9 1.6 10.1 29.2 0.68 7534 0.058 7 1 280 14

TM052-002+004+005+08 79.3 1.6 9.7 27.6 0.46 7502 0.057 7 1.06 30 -4

S5

TM013-001 76.3 1.46 9.72 25.8 0.57 7504 0.048 5.5 1.07 5 -19

TM020-001_003 73.2 1.4 10.3 25.7 0.43 7400 0.09 6 1.09 15 -18

TM022-002 70.4 1.5 10.1 28.1 0.42 7442 0.08 7 1.07 105 12

TM022-005 63 1.3 10.2 27.6 0.75 7430 0.07 7.5 1.06 135 30

TM024-002_003 71.8 1.7 9.3 28.1 0.49 7546 0.07 7 1.05 70 19

S4

TM012-002 45.7 1.12 9.75 24.73 0.56 7589 0.14 6 1.07 37 -15

TM004-002/003 79.8 0.73 10.01 23.37 0.52 7574 0.066 5.5 1.09 4 n/a

TM004-008 58 1.45 9.74 22.18 0.43 7458 0.008 2.5 1.1 1 n/a

TM040-002+TM040-004 63.1 1.5 10.3 22.7 0.4 7500 0.146 2.5 1.1 0 -11

TM050-002 52.2 1.6 10.9 23.4 0.56 7322 0.258 2 1.09 5 -18

TM048-004 76.2 1.1 10 24.4 0.68 7662 0.004 5.5 1.14 155 13

S2 TM028-001+004_005 47.1 1.5 13.1 26.5 0.65 7228 0.004 7.5 1.06 265 16

The ash chemistry is a key factor in estimating coke stability after reaction (CSR) values. The presence of

alkaline elements such as Fe, Ca, Na and K has a catalytic effect on the reaction of CO2 with coke, resulting

in an accelerated breakdown in the blast furnace. Coals with low alkaline content will have the highest,

most desirable CSR characteristics. The other evaluation aspect that warrants consideration is the

phosphorous content of the coke. The acceptable maximum limit is 0.27% P2O5 in coke; which means,

that in general, clean coal should have less than 2.5% P2O5 in the ash. Ash chemistry results for 2018

and 2019 Tent Mountain coal samples are displayed in Table 12-5.


Table 12-5 2018 and 2019 Mineral Analysis of Ash

Petrographic Composition

The strength of coke produced can be determined by the petrographic composition of the organic

elements of the coal, called macerals. These are divided into reactive macerals (those that melt during

coke making) and inert macerals (those that don't). It is important to have the right ratio of reactives to

inerts to produce a strong coke. Canadian hard coking coals tend to exhibit lower vitrinite levels, which

is reacvtive, and higher semi-fusinite levels than other global export hard coking coals and accepted

practice in Canada is to categorize 50% of the semi-fusinite as reactive. 50% of the semi-fusinite in Tent

Mountain coal is believed to carbonise in a similar fashion to vitrinite. Petrographic data from 2018 and

2019 Tent Mountain coal samples are displayed in Table 12-6 and

Table 12-7 with R0 Max values displayed in Table 12-4. The tested samples show RoMax values ranging

from 1.00 to 1.14; total reactives in the 56.1% to 83.7% range; and total inerts in the 16.3% to 43.9%

range.

Seam ID

Sample ID

SiO

2

Al2 O

3

Fe

2 O3

Ca

O

Mg

O

Na

2 O

K2 O

TiO

2

Mn

3 O4

SO

3

P2 O

5

Ba

O

SrO

Zn

O

S7 TM027-002+004+006 61.3 21.4 1.69 4.23 0.59 0.1 1.01 1.36 0.001 1.43 4.94 1.5 0.49 0.03

S6

TM027-008+TM027-011 49.2 29.5 3.49 4.89 1.66 0.56 0.9 1.3 0.023 3.58 2.77 1.2 0.31 0.02 TM027B-002+005 50.7 27.9 4.72 4.39 1.67 0.42 0.92 1.45 0.055 3.63 1.83 0.85 0.21 0.02

TM045B-002+005 65.4 23.5 1.47 3.06 0.7 0.1 1.36 1.42 0.004 1.68 1.32 0.45 0.15 0.02 TM052-002+004+005+08 51.8 28 3.95 4.95 1.94 0.18 0.92 1.55 0.033 4.61 1.34 0.7 0.16 0.02

TM045-002+005+006 63.2 23 1.66 4.12 0.79 0.11 1.38 1.28 0.005 2.72 1.58 0.49 0.16 0.02

S5

TM020-001_003 50.2 29.8 3.15 4.48 1.5 0.3 0.58 1.55 0.022 3.97 2.01 1.03 0.2 0.01 TM022-002 57.7 30.1 1.06 2.22 0.7 0.21 1.02 2.03 <.001 1.45 1.82 0.84 0.19 0.01

TM013-001 57.22 26.87 2.34 3.01 1.03 0.61 0.58 1.39 0.04 2.77 1.14 0.73 0.12 - TM024-002_003 58.3 27.9 1.79 3.01 0.85 0.26 1.32 1.79 0.003 1.7 1.72 0.7 0.16 0.03 TM022-005 58 33.1 1.15 1.62 0.56 0.1 0.74 1.72 0.003 1.3 1.58 0.79 0.2 0.06

S4

TM040-002+TM040-004 53.2 33.2 2.18 2.87 0.71 0.32 0.4 1.73 0.019 1.57 3.24 1.29 0.53 0.02 TM004-002/003 57.75 33.03 1.79 0.67 0.27 0.5 0.46 1.72 0.02 0.3 1.5 0.48 0.15 - TM050-002 48.6 33.8 2.38 1.63 0.3 0.1 0.79 2.02 0.01 0.72 5.41 2.76 1 0.02

TM004-008 60.73 30.78 1.96 0.42 0.36 0.53 0.58 2.3 0.02 0.17 0.18 0.25 0.03 - TM012-002 55.34 26.8 3.02 3.46 0.4 0.5 0.4 1.81 0.06 1.17 3.3 1.03 0.44 - TM048-004 73.5 21.9 0.89 0.18 0.34 0.12 1.11 1.2 <.001 0.04 0.09 0.03 0.02 0.03

S2 TM028-001+004_005 63.2 30.5 2.1 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.8 1.9 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0


Table 12-6 2018 and 2019 Core Petrographic Analysis – Reactive Components

Seam ID

Composite Sample Total

Vitrinites Total

Liptinite Reactive

Semifusinite Total

Reactives

S7 TM027-002+004+006 65.2 4.1 13.0 82.3

S6

TM027-008+TM027-011 57.3 3.0 15.4 75.7

TM027B-002+005 60.0 0.6 13.2 73.8

TM045-002+005+006 66.2 5.6 11.9 83.7

TM045B-002+005 67.1 2.0 10.9 80.0

TM052-002+004+005+08 62.1 3.9 14.7 80.7

S5

TM0013-001 62.8 1.3 10.6 74.7

TM020-001_003 51.9 3.4 19.3 74.6

TM022-002 63.1 3.4 13.0 79.5

TM022-005 55.0 5.1 15.1 75.2

TM024-002_003 65.4 3.6 12.1 81.1

S4

TM004-002/003 42.2 0.9 20.1 63.2

TM004-008 25.3 0.2 30.6 56.1

TM0012-002 47.6 1.7 16.4 65.7

TM040-002+TM040-004 43.4 0.4 23.6 67.4

TM048-004 56.0 0.6 15.1 71.7

TM050-002 50.4 2.2 17.5 70.1

S2 TM028-001+004_005 56.2 3.5 15.1 74.8

Table 12-7 2018 and 2019 Core Petrographic Analysis – Inert Components

Seam ID

Composite Sample Inert

Semifusinite Fusinite Inertodetrinite Macrinite

Mineral Matter

Total Inerts

S7 TM027-002+004+006 13.0 1.4 1.2 <.1 2.1 17.7

S6

TM027-008+TM027-011 15.4 2.0 1.2 <.1 5.7 24.3

TM027B-002+005 13.2 6.2 0.4 <.1 6.4 26.2

TM045-002+005+006 11.8 1.1 1.5 <.1 1.9 16.3

TM045B-002+005 10.8 6.3 <.1 <.1 2.9 20.0

TM052-002+004+005+08 14.6 0.4 1.4 <.1 2.9 19.3

S5

TM0013-001 10.6 7.4 1.5 0.4 5.4 25.3

TM020-001_003 19.4 1.0 1.2 <.1 3.8 25.4

TM022-002 13.0 0.2 1.5 <.1 5.8 20.5

TM022-005 15.2 0.2 4.9 0.2 4.3 24.8

TM024-002_003 12.0 0.8 1.2 <.1 4.9 18.9

S4

TM004-002/003 20.1 8.6 2.3 0.2 5.6 36.8

TM004-008 30.6 6.4 1.1 0.2 5.6 43.9

TM0012-002 16.5 10.8 1.4 <.1 5.6 34.3

TM040-002+TM040-004 23.5 6.4 <.1 <.1 2.7 32.6

TM048-004 15.0 10.3 0.4 <.1 2.6 28.3

TM050-002 17.4 10.1 <.1 <.1 2.4 29.9

S2 TM028-001+004_005 15.1 0.4 6.6 <.1 2.9 25.0


13 MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATES

This section describes the Mineral Resource estimation methodology and summarizes the key

assumptions considered by Dahrouge. Dahrouge has prepared the Mineral Resource estimate reported

herein as a reasonable representation of In-Place Coal Resources of the No. 7, No. 6, No. 5, No. 4 and No.

2 Coal Seams at the Jurassic-Cretaceous Tent Mountain Deposit situated in southwest Alberta in the

Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin, for Montem Resources Alberta Operations Limited. The resources

are estimated as of February 20 2020, and are contained within 1 BC Coal Lease (CL389283 (BC)), 11

Alberta Coal Leases (013 1306080822, 013 1306080821, 013 1306080820, 013 1306080819, 013

1305100739, 013 1305090668, 013 1305090667, 013 1305090666, 013 1305090665, 013

1305090664, 013 1305090663) and a collection of Alberta Freehold Tenements.

The Mineral Resources have been estimated in conformity with generally accepted CIM “Estimation of

Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserves Best Practices” guidelines and the Australian Guidelines for the

Estimation and Classification of Coal Resources. This is preliminary resource estimation. Montem is

currently engaged in completing Advanced Technical Studies for the Project to determine the mining

development plan. Factors affecting reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction are

discussed in Section 13-3.

Mineral Resource Estimates for the Tent Mountain Mine in this report are based on Montem’s 2018/2019

drilling programs; and historical drilling, adits, surface mapping and trench data that was collected on

the Property from 1973 onwards. A geological model was constructed prior to the 2019 drilling program

and validated during and afterward against all collected data. A Resource model and estimate was

generated from the geological model and the current Resource Estimation generated using the available

information.

13.1 RESOURCE DATABASE

A preliminary Resource database was received from Montem in early 2019. The historical database

compilation was generated under the oversight of the previous Qualified or Competent Persons, as part

of the 2005 Norwest Corp., 2017 Geoff Jordan Associates Corp. Resource Estimates and the 2018 Tamplin

Resources Pty Ltd. JORC Compliant Resource Estimate.

Dahrouge received a database constructed in Microsoft Excel® containing collar locations surveyed in

UTM NAD83 zone 11 coordinates, drillhole orientations (lacking detailed downhole deviation surveys),

and geologic intervals with rock types. Upon receipt of the database, Dahrouge completed a 100%

validation of historical drillhole locations; an approximate 75% check of coal seam intersections; and

100% check of newly added historical information, creating an independent database (Table 11-2 and

Table 11-3). Dahrouge constructed and validated the 2018-2019 database and generated a historical

coal quality database for the Property that was provided to A&B Mylec, who oversaw the 2018-2019 coal

quality programs.

Drillholes were qualified using a reliability indicator classification system, from 1-3 (Table 11-1). The

reliability was based on the quantity and quality of data available and the known accuracy of each

drillhole location (collar and downhole deviation). Only drillholes assigned a reliability of 1, and that met

the statistical requirements, had the ability to be converted to a Measured Resource classification.

Drillholes assigned a reliability of 1 and 2 had the ability to be converted to an Indicated Resource

classification and drillholes assigned a reliability of 3 were restricted to geologic control except as noted

below. An isolated cluster of six drillholes assigned a reliability of 3 were upgraded in resource

classification because they intersected seam S2 within a 100 m radius, increasing their reliability.


The geological and Resource models were constructed using a database of 232 drillholes, including the

76 drillholes completed between 2018 and 2019 and 156 historical drillholes, totalling 37,298.87 m

(Table 11-2). A total of 36 drillholes were excluded from the model due to insufficient or conflicting

location information (Table 11-3). An additional 29 surveyed measured sections generated from trench

mapping and high-resolution drone imagery were incorporated into the model. These datapoints were

used for geological control.

13.2 GEOLOGICAL MODEL

The geological model was constructed using an implicit 3-D modelling software, Leapfrog GeoTM. A vetted

database was imported into LeapfrogTM, where it was validated, and any erroneous or conflicting data

was amended.

The geological model incorporated the following data into its control points and interpretation:

• Historical surface maps, cross-sections and mine plans

• Surface mapping datapoints

• Drilling and trenching datapoints

• In-situ downhole Acoustic and Optical Televiewer measurements

The historical surface maps, cross-sections and mine plans were used to evaluate the geological

structures and stratigraphic orientations, using 3-D modelling software. These sections in combination

with the historical drillhole database were used to design a working model that was revised and validated

during the 2018-2019 drill programs.

Figure 13-1 Historical Cross-Section in LeapfrogTM

The surface mapping control points and structure lines (faults, fold axes, seam outcrops and stratigraphic

member contacts) were incorporated into the model, first using the more recent generalized surface

mapping data and then expanding to the more complex Canadian Geological Survey (1996) mapping

data. Historical surface data points were georeferenced and combined with those collected during the

2019 program and used to generate stratigraphic trends in LeapfrogTM structural modeling (Table 8-1).


The summarized modelling methodology used for the Geological Model for all areas of the Property

consisted of the following steps:

• Digitized historical and current surface datapoints were loaded into the model.

• Resource Database was imported and validated for visual and Leapfrog-identified s.

• Database collar locations were compared against surface topography that was constructed from

the Lidar (2017) survey and high-resolution drone survey (2019).

• The UTM NAD83 Zone 11 geographic coordinate system was used.

• Regional faults were modelled using surface, drillhole and Acoustic/Optical Televiewer

datapoints and orientations.

• Structural trends and form interpolants were generated in LeapfrogTM using oriented surface

measurements in the structural modeling toolbox.

• The stratigraphic Formations/Members were modelled using LeapfrogTM Stratigraphic

Sequence geological modelling method and the modelled members and formations in order of

youngest to oldest included:

o Mutz Member (JKKMU),

o Hillcrest Member (JKKH),

o Adanac Member (JKKA),

o Morrissey Formation (JKKM),

o Fernie Formation (JF).

• The coal seams solids were modelled using the LeapfrogTM Vein System geological modelling

method, where individual plies were modelled as veins within a seam package (or vein system)

and the modelled seam packages included:

o Seams S7,

o S6 (S6u, S6m, S6l),

o S5 (S5u, S5m, S5l),

o S4(S4u, S4m, S4l),

o S3 (S3u, S3l),

o S2 (S2u, S2l).

• The stratigraphic model and coal seam model were created using the same structural trends and

were controlled using interpreted polyline controls in areas where control datapoint density

decreased.

• Historical mine working solids were modelled using LeapfrogTM Intrusion geological modelling

method and were constrained using limited drill intersections, surface mapping, and historical

cross-sections. The basal surface of historical dumps and pits were used to generate an

approximate bedrock surface that could be used to build the base of weathering surface (Figure

13-2).

• The stratigraphic model, seam model, and historical workings were combined into a single

model.

• Coal seam solids were generated for each ply and clipped to the base of weathering surface,

which included the historical workings, removing historically extracted zones and the upper

oxidized coal.

• LeapfrogTM generated coal seam and stratigraphic solids were validated using LeapfrogTM solid

evaluation tools; detailed visual inspection; and VulcanTM solid triangulation tools testing for

conservation of volume, consistency, closure, and crossing/self-intersection.

• SRK structural geologist and Resource Geologist completed an independent review of both the

stratigraphic and coal seam solids.


Figure 13-2 Solid modelling of Historical Workings

Representative geological cross-sections are presented in Figure 13-4 through Figure 13-7 and their

locations are presented in Figure 13-3. Geological sections were generated in LeapfrogTM and are set up

as south looking cross-sections sections to match the historical mining direction.


Figure 13-3 Cross-section Location Map


Figure 13-4 South Looking Geological Cross-Section Lines +2400 to +1600


Figure 13-5 South Looking Geological Cross-Section Lines +1200 to +0400


Figure 13-6 South Looking Geological Cross-section Lines -0400 to -1200


Figure 13-7 South Looking Geological Cross-section Lines -1600 to -2400


13.3 RESOURCE SUMMARY

As the stratigraphic and structural complexity of a coal deposit increases, a greater number of data points

are required to assign the coal to Measured, Indicated, or Inferred resource categories. Data points are

defined as locations where a coal seam, or a marker horizon indicating the proximity to a coal seam, is

exposed. Valid data points were obtained from drillhole intersections and measured sections. Table 13-1

outlines the resource classification criteria example used for different geology types. This table was used

as a reference for defining the complexity of the geology and to support the Resource Classifications.

Consideration for reasonable prospects for production at Tent Mountain include favourable geology

(other nearby producers of coking coal from the same formation and seams), nearby infrastructure

(road, rail and power), abundant available water, a nearby labour pool (3 operating surface coking coal

mines), favourable land-use categories, and a favourable government and social attitude to resource

extraction.

Table 13-1 Generalized Resource Classification Categories Guide (Hughes et al., 1989)

Geology Type Resource Classification (Distance from Point)

Measured Indicated Inferred

Moderate 0-450 m 450-900 m 900-2,400 m

Complex 0-100 m 100-200 m 200-400 m

Severe 0-50 m 50-100 m 100-200 m

A moderate geology type occurs where the deposit has only been subjected to limited tectonic

deformation. This may include faults with displacements of less than 10 m, although these should be

uncommon. Homoclines and broad open folds with wavelengths less than 1.5 km may also be present

and bedding should not exceed 30°.

A complex geology type occurs where a deposit has been subjected to relatively high levels of tectonic

deformation. Fault bounded blocks within this deposit type generally retain their normal stratigraphic

sequence and seams will have only rarely been modified from their pre-deformational thickness. Tight

folds with steeply dipping or overturned limbs can be present and offsets by faults are common.

A severe geology type occurs where extreme tectonic deformation has occurred. The stratigraphic

sequence is commonly disturbed and difficult to ascertain, whereas coal seams are often structurally

thickened and thinned from their pre-deformational state. Tight folds, steeply inclined and overturned

beds, and large displacement faults are common.

13.3.1 RESOURCE CLASSIFICATION

For the purpose of this resource classification the Tent Mountain Mine has been assigned as a complex

geology type, due to the presence of regional and local faulting, folding and deformation seam thickening.

Resource classifications were determined using an Inverse Distance Estimator (ID2) with the follow

criteria:

• Datapoints used were restricted to confirmed coal seam intersections and did not use marker

horizon indicators, given the complex geology type assignment

• Search definitions were set where a minimum of 3 confirmed coal seam points of observation

must be intersected within the defined search radius and restricted to one sample per drillhole

• A single point of observation was not considered adequate for the structural complexity and the

recorded seam orientation changes.


• A drillhole reliability filter was used to selectively control which coal seam data points were used

in the Resource classification:

o Measured required reliability classification = 1

o Indicated required reliability classification = 1 and 2

o Inferred used all reliability classifications = 1,2, and isolated 3

• ID2 search ellipsoids were set to the following search ranges:

o Measured - Maximum 100 m; Intermediate 100 m; and Minimum 100 m

o Indicated - Maximum 250 m; Intermediate 200 m; Minimum 200 m

▪ Maximum search radius was increased to 250 m along the geological trend of

the deposit

o Inferred - Maximum 400 m; Intermediate 400 m; Minimum 400 m

• The ID2 classified blocks were exported from LeapfrogTM to VulcanTM where triangulated solid

grade shells were created and used to populate Resource confidence in the VulcanTM HARP

model.

• Each generated grade shell solid was checked to confirm consistency, closure, and no

crossing/self-intersection.

The base-of-weathering clipped Resource classification grade shell polygons are illustrated in Figure

13-8 to Figure 13-12, presenting the near-surface distribution of Measured, Indicated and Inferred

categories for the individual seams.


Figure 13-8 Resource Classification Plan Map – Seam S6


13.3.2 DENSITY AND ASH GRID MODELLING

Historical density information for the Property was relatively sparse and all past resource estimations

used a constant bulk density value that was assumed across the Property. This value was determined

from the coal rank and average ash contents as defined in GSC 88-21. Average dried ash content was

determined to be 15-20 percent by weight, with a rank classification of medium volatile bituminous coal.

This produced an average bulk density of 1.45 g/cm3.

The current resource estimation used a variable in situ density derived from the laboratory reported

relative densities. Coal seam quality grid models were constructed in Maptek’s Vulcan 12 TM. The

database used to construct the ash and relatively density coal seam quality grids consisted of:

• 2018 and 2019 drillhole data

• Historical coal quality samples that met the criteria of >80% core/sample recovery and <20%

parting inclusion by length

• Historical coal quality samples selected by A&B Mylec for their washability analysis with selection

criteria outlined in section 11 of this report

The grid models for the four quality variables for each seam ply were interpolated using an inverse

distance squared (ID2) algorithm on coal seam composites of sampled drillholes. Grid models created for

each individual seam ply for each quality variable – air-dried ash, air-dried relative density, in situ ash,

and in situ relative density were visually validated in Vulcan 12TM by comparing values from the sampled

coal composite interval to the generated ID2 quality grid value and the surrounding interpolated values.

Quality grids were also checked to ensure that the interpolated values propagated to the full extent of

the Leapfrog Geo TM geologic model. Coal quality grids were not created for two seam plies, S3L and S3U,

due to the lack of representative coal quality data.

An in-situ moisture of 5% was applied for a relative density correction to estimate in-situ density. The

following formula from Preston and Saunders (1993) was used:

[RDad x (100 - Mad)] / [100 + RDad x (ISM – Mad) – ISM]

The average weight percent air-dried moisture was 1.28% from 47 coal quality samples submitted for

laboratory analysis from the 2019 drilling program. Using air-dried moisture + 4% to calculate in-situ

moisture this yielded an estimated in situ moisture for the deposit of 5.3%. Least squares regression of

the relationship between ash and relative density by A&B Mylec shows a good correlation based on 867

historical and current samples using an assumed in-situ moisture of 5% (Figure 13-13).

Statistical outputs of each coal quality variable for each seam ply, which was performed using

Vulcan Data AnalyzerTM, are presented in Table 13-2 and

Table 13-3 below,. The DatamineTM classic block model block statistics closely matched the Vulcan

statistics.


Figure 13-13 Ash vs Density Correlation for Tent Mountain

Table 13-2 HARP Block Model Ash (In-Situ) Grid Statistics

Seam Block Count

Mean Ash

Standard Deviation

Variance CV Min Max Upper

Quartile Lower

Quartile

S7 19546 35.11 5.44 29.64 0.16 21.70 39.73 38.31 35.57

S6u 62386 20.32 5.06 25.59 0.25 11.77 40.90 23.90 16.21

S6m 24901 15.06 3.12 9.73 0.21 11.73 28.24 14.84 13.47

S6l 14588 22.63 5.71 32.56 0.25 12.02 36.77 28.65 18.96

S5u 99297 22.02 2.77 7.68 0.13 12.00 32.49 23.88 19.96

S5m 53933 28.26 1.07 1.15 0.04 21.66 32.50 28.74 28.02

S5l 60662 27.63 3.20 10.24 0.12 13.60 36.30 29.33 25.89

S4u 155713 26.67 3.75 14.07 0.14 17.32 36.10 29.42 23.77

S4m 128592 25.15 3.51 12.34 0.14 18.80 36.10 27.43 22.60

S4l 110222 28.01 2.62 6.87 0.09 19.92 32.80 30.33 25.56

S3u 79401 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

S3l 32699 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

S2u 327079 27.25 4.00 16.04 0.15 11.48 39.50 28.97 26.24

S2l 237805 30.02 3.83 14.67 0.13 17.41 43.60 31.27 27.79

y = 0.0123x + 1.2124R² = 0.9656

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Re

lati

ve D

en

sity

at

5%

Mo

istu

re

Ash % at 5% Moisture

Rd_Is(Mis=5%)


Table 13-3 HARP Block Model Relative Density (In-Situ) Statistics

Seam Block Count

Mean RD

Standard Deviation

Variance CV Min Max Upper

Quartile Lower

Quartile

S7 19546 1.6 0.07 0.01 0.04 1.46 1.70 1.68 1.65

S6u 62386 1.5 0.05 0.00 0.03 1.37 1.66 1.48 1.41

S6m 24901 1.4 0.03 0.00 0.02 1.37 1.52 1.40 1.39

S6l 14588 1.5 0.05 0.00 0.04 1.37 1.62 1.53 1.45

S5u 99297 1.5 0.03 0.00 0.02 1.38 1.55 1.48 1.44

S5m 53933 1.5 0.01 0.00 0.01 1.45 1.55 1.52 1.51

S5l 60662 1.5 0.03 0.00 0.02 1.39 1.60 1.53 1.50

S4u 155713 1.5 0.04 0.00 0.02 1.41 1.60 1.54 1.48

S4m 128592 1.5 0.03 0.00 0.02 1.42 1.59 1.51 1.47

S4l 110222 1.5 0.02 0.00 0.02 1.46 1.56 1.53 1.49

S3u 79401 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

S3l 32699 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

S2u 327079 1.5 0.05 0.00 0.03 1.37 1.69 1.54 1.51

S2l 237805 1.5 0.04 0.00 0.03 1.41 1.70 1.56 1.52

13.3.3 RESOURCE ESTIMATION PROCEDURE

Maptek’s VulcanTM 12 was utilized to generate the block model for the Project. The modelling database,

topography, seam and structural models from the Leapfrog GeoTM Tent Mountain geologic model were

imported into VulcanTM. Imported data was evaluated to confirm the correct model extents, coordinate

system, location of drill collars, and coal seam intersections relative to seam solid and structural models.

Additionally, any imported triangulated solids were validated to ensure conservation of original volumes,

closure of the solids, consistency of the solids, and no crossing or self-intersections. The LeapfrogTM seam

models for each ply were converted into VulcanTM seam roof and seam floor surfaces. Each resultant

VulcanTM roof and floor surface was evaluated to ensure no crossing or self-intersections had been

created during the conversion process. Seam roof and floor surfaces were overlaid and visually compared

to their original parent LeapfrogTM solids to confirm surface geometries and extents were honoured.

The validated VulcanTM seam roof and seam floor surfaces, along with the structural controls, were used

to generate a 10 m x 10 m (x, y), with 5 m x 5 m sub-blocking (x, y), Vulcan HARP block model. A HARP

model registers to triangulated surfaces, in this case, a seam roof and a seam floor, to create a HARP seam

solid model; seam volumes generated by the VulcanTM HARP model were visually and volumetrically

compared back to the original LeapfrogTM seam solid models for verification. HARP seam volumes and

geometries preserved the LeapfrogTM parent volumes and geometries for the modelled coal seams, in all

areas but an isolated overturned fold zone. The VulcanTM triangulated surfaces in this isolated area under

reported the volumes because:

• The same grid based XY coordinate exists for two values of Z on a seam roof or seam floor

• The overturned geometry placed the seam floor above the seam roof


This resulted in a minor local loss of HARP seam volumes of 0.2 % when compared back to the original

LeapfrogTM seam solid models, dominantly affecting a seam solid area occurring above the base of

weathering, which was removed from the resource as oxidized material. The volume losses occurring

below the base of weathering were minimal and did not significantly impact the overall modelled coal

seam volumes, when validated against LeapfrogTM and DatamineTM block models.

After validation, cumulative and incremental stripping ratios were assigned to each block containing coal

in the HARP model, using the Integrated Stratigraphic Modelling (ISM) module in VulcanTM. Stripping

ratios for each seam were visually validated through block display against the depth to the modelled coal

seam for relative highs and lows.

The summarized modelling methodology used for the resource estimation for all areas of the Property

consisted of the following steps:

• Import validated LeapfrogTM modelling database, topography, seam solid triangulations, and

structural model into Maptek Vulcan 12TM

• Verify correct coordinate system (UTM NAD83 Zone 11N) and model extents for imported data

• Validate seam solid triangulations, testing for conservation of volume, consistency, closure, and


• Validate structural fault blocks, testing for conservation of volume, consistency, closure, and


• Validate structural fault surfaces by applying a Boolean test against the corresponding fault

block.

• Visually confirm placement of drill collars relative to topography and assigned model

coordinates.

• Visually confirm drill intersections correspond to seam solid and structural models

• Build the VulcanTM Horizon List (gdc_glob).

• Convert LeapfrogTM seam solid triangulations into VulcanTM seam roof and floor surfaces

• Validate VulcanTM seam roof and seam floor surfaces by visual comparison to the original

LeapfrogTM seam solid triangulations.

• Create a HARP block model. Blocks were 10 m x 10 m with a 5 m x 5 m sub-blocking (x and y

directions).

• Validate HARP generated seam volumes against original LeapfrogTM seam solid triangulation

volumes.

• Superimpose and visually verify HARP generated seam solid triangulations honour original

LeapfrogTM seam solid triangulations.

• Determine the cumulative stripping ratio for each block of coal within the model (total volume

of waste/total tonnage of product).

• Generate VulcanTM grade shells for each resource classification – Measured, Indicated, and

Inferred from the LeapfrogTM ID2 generated Resource classification.

• Apply a maximum Resource depth cut-off of 500 m’s from topography accommodating for the

steep topographic terrain.

o A total of 34 drillholes exceeded 300 m depth, with 11 of these drillholes greater than

450 m, supporting the deeper Resource evaluation

• HARP Cells were populated for Resource classification grade shells, Ash (ad) quality grids and

Relative Density (ad) quality grids.

• Constrain resource estimation by Montem Lease and Freehold Tenement boundaries


• Constrain resource estimation to a seam aggregate thickness greater than 0.6 m with a

maximum internal ply interburden < 0.45 m.

Table 13-4 Resource Reporting Criteria

Area

Resource Criteria

Coal Bed

Thickness

Stripping

Ratio Partings

Tent

Mountain

Aggregate

Thickness > 0.6 m SR < 20:1

Seams modelled as individual plies with average

contained partings less than 0.2 m;

Aggregate coal thickness > 0.6 m

Max internal ply interburden < 0.45 m

13.4 RESOURCE STATEMENT

This statement covers the Tent Mountain Mine resource estimate that was reported February 20, 2020.

For the purpose of resource classification, a surface minable resource was used. Surface resources are

those resources with a cumulative stripping ratio of less than 20:1 (cubic metres of waste to a tonne of

coal), an aggregate seam thickness greater than 0.6 m, and a vertical depth from topography less than

500 m. A more conservative minimum seam thickness cut-off of 0.6 m instead of 0.3 m is in common use

for coals of the western Canadian Cordillera due to the greater structural complexity. The remaining coal

resources at Tent Mountain have open cut potential. The steep mountainous terrain at the Tent Mountain

Mine limits the deepest portions of the resource to areas immediately below the more elevated portions

of the Project such as peaks and topographic highs. Overall, more than 80% of the resource occurs at

depths of less than 300 m total depth with the shallower portions of the deposit occurring in the more

aerially extensive hillside flanks and valleys. The deposit geometry makes the resource potentially

suitable for a Mountain Top Removal (MTM) mining approach which justifies the application of a 500 m

depth cut-off for open cut resources. Similar mining approaches are currently in practice at Canada at

Elkview, Fording River and Grand Cache Coal Mines. The MTM approach is also widely practiced in the

Appalachian Mountains in the eastern United States. A definitive evaluation of the mining methods has

not been completed and included in this report. Montem is in the process of completing Advanced

Technical Studies for the Project to determine the mining development plan.

The in-place resources for the Tent Mountain Mine are summarized in Table 13-5 and detailed by seam

in Table 13-6 to Table 13-10.

Plan view maps illustrating the resource defined stripping ratios for each coal seam package are

presented in Figure 13-14 to Figure 13-18 and a plan view of the resource classification categories are

presented in Figure 13-8 to Figure 13-12 .

Table 13-5 In-Place Coal Resources Summary by Province (kilotonnes), Reported as of

February 20, 2020

Area In-Place Coal Resources (kilotonnes)

ASTM Group Measured Indicated Inferred

Alberta Medium Volatile

Bituminous 3,655 40,796 5,193

British Columbia Medium Volatile

Bituminous 0 7,290 3,183

Total 3,655 48,085 8,376


Table 13-6 In-Place Coal Resources Summary for Alberta by Coal Seam and Measured Resource Classification (kilotonnes), reported as of

February 20, 2020

Classification Measured

Province Alberta

Depth 0 - 100 m 100 m - 200 m 200 m - 300 m 300 m - 500 m Total

Tonnage Seam

True Thick.

SR (Ave)

Tonnage True

Thick. SR

(Ave) Tonnage

True Thick.

SR (Ave)

Tonnage True

Thick. SR

(Ave) Tonnage

(m) (bcm/t) (Ktonnes) (m) (bcm/t) (Ktonnes) (m) (bcm/t) (Ktonnes) (m) (bcm/t) (Ktonnes) (Ktonnes)

s7 1.4 12.04 15 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 15

s6u 3.7 5.50 301 4.3 11.75 117 - - 0 - - 0 418

s6m 2.9 3.03 162 3.2 8.77 84 - - 0 - - 0 246

s6l 1.9 2.44 88 1.0 8.37 30 - - 0 - - 0 118

s5u 2.8 6.67 235 3.1 8.12 179 2.7 11.84 3 - - 0 416

s5m 4.2 3.16 245 3.4 5.40 200 3.1 8.11 3 - - 0 448

s5l 4.3 2.23 205 3.5 4.26 189 5.2 5.08 6 - - 0 399

s4u 2.8 5.14 382 1.7 6.46 60 1.1 6.02 0.3 - - 0 443

s4m 6.3 1.54 360 1.9 5.12 52 0.9 5.83 0.2 - - 0 412

s4l 2.3 2.07 172 2.2 4.34 25 - - 0 - - 0 197

s3u 1.1 10.73 24 1.0 14.29 11 - - 0 - - 0 34

s3l 0.4 4.05 0.3 0.1 16.17 0.1 - - 0 - - 0 0

s2u 2.1 8.00 139 2.9 8.25 142 - - 0 - - 0 280

s2l 2.4 4.00 140 2.4 6.77 88 - - 0 - - 0 228

Sub Total 2,468 1,175 12 0 3,655

*Stripping Ratio (SR) is presented as the average cumulative stripping ratio for each seam


Table 13-7 In-Place Coal Resources Summary for Alberta by Coal Seam and Indicated Resource Classification (kilotonnes), reported as of

February 20, 2020

Classification Indicated

Province Alberta


Tonnage Seam

True Thick.

SR (Ave)

Tonnage True

Thick. SR

(Ave) Tonnage

True Thick.

SR (Ave)

Tonnage True

Thick. SR

(Ave) Tonnage


s7 3.3 6.61 145 3.9 16.37 63 3.1 18.08 19 2.5 16.11 5 232

s6u 4.0 6.10 254 5.5 11.12 395 5.4 15.02 165 2.9 17.46 109 922

s6m 4.3 2.98 283 4.3 8.12 318 3.0 14.55 156 2.1 17.64 143 901

s6l 3.3 1.88 220 2.4 6.56 212 1.6 13.59 142 1.2 16.37 60 634

s5u 3.9 4.79 530 3.6 8.03 651 3.8 9.91 627 3.6 15.53 890 2,698

s5m 5.0 1.89 590 4.3 5.01 730 4.3 8.23 981 3.9 13.06 1,432 3,733

s5l 4.4 1.17 528 3.8 3.81 530 4.9 6.15 827 5.2 10.26 1,957 3,843

s4u 2.9 7.73 2,731 2.0 7.31 372 1.7 6.26 425 2.1 9.39 930 4,458

s4m 4.7 3.35 2,047 2.3 6.19 359 2.2 5.96 459 2.2 8.40 836 3,701

s4l 2.5 3.53 1,417 2.1 8.58 397 1.6 6.68 198 1.2 8.41 396 2,409

s3u 1.5 9.74 922 1.1 11.68 896 0.8 9.76 86 0.6 8.31 53 1,957

s3l 1.2 7.49 459 1.2 10.91 440 1.0 17.90 23 - - 0 922

s2u 4.1 5.92 2,786 3.4 10.98 3,066 3.4 12.74 2,299 3.1 8.95 1,419 9,570

s2l 2.0 5.72 1,419 1.7 9.95 1,549 1.6 11.07 909 2.1 8.13 939 4,816

Sub Total 14,330 9,978 7,317 9,170 40,796



Table 13-8 In-Place Coal Resources Summary for BC by Coal Seam and Indicated Resource Classification (kilotonnes), reported as of

February 20, 2020

Classification Indicated

Province British Columbia


Tonnage Seam

True Thick.

SR (Ave)

Tonnage True

Thick. SR

(Ave) Tonnage

True Thick.

SR (Ave)

Tonnage True

Thick. SR

(Ave) Tonnage


s7 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0

s6u 1.5 7.51 52 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 52

s6m 3.9 2.28 160 3.2 7.07 3 - - 0 - - 0 163

s6l 4.1 1.47 162 2.3 4.32 9 - - 0 - - 0 171

s5u 5.1 3.24 364 4.7 5.53 243 3.1 6.57 7 - - 0 615

s5m 2.7 1.84 234 2.6 4.55 190 2.6 5.66 14 - - 0 438

s5l 5.6 0.79 556 6.6 2.62 506 7.3 3.26 75 - - 0 1,137

s4u 2.3 4.86 471 1.6 7.53 180 1.3 3.93 72 1.5 3.60 0.2 723

s4m 1.3 4.30 172 2.2 5.37 239 2.0 3.47 87 1.9 3.56 1 499

s4l 1.8 2.97 134 1.4 5.00 175 0.9 3.53 28 0.3 3.98 0.2 337

s3u 0.6 5.39 25 0.2 5.54 3 - - 0 - - 0 28

s3l - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0

s2u 2.5 5.80 147 2.7 15.51 124 2.8 11.67 279 3.2 9.16 581 1,131

s2l 4.1 2.03 221 6.4 6.64 555 6.7 9.15 1101 2.0 8.46 120 1,996

Sub Total 2,698 2,228 1,663 702 7,290



Table 13-9 In-Place Coal Resources Summary for Alberta by Coal Seam and Inferred Resource Classification (kilotonnes), reported as of

February 20, 2020

Classification Inferred

Province Alberta


Tonnage Seam

True Thick.

SR (Ave)

Tonnage True

Thick. SR

(Ave) Tonnage

True Thick.

SR (Ave)

Tonnage True

Thick. SR

(Ave) Tonnage


s7 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0

s6u - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 2.0 15.55 115 115

s6m - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 1.4 16.10 37 37

s6l - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 1.1 17.95 7 7

s5u - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 3.1 16.16 83 83

s5m - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 3.6 14.72 144 144

s5l 2.1 0.87 2 - - 0 - - 0 6.4 12.72 326 328

s4u 2.0 8.76 126 2.4 16.22 9 - - 0 2.5 15.49 33 168

s4m 5.8 1.36 122 1.0 11.58 34 - - 0 3.0 17.29 135 291

s4l 1.5 1.99 58 1.3 10.21 68 - - 0 1.4 16.80 80 207

s3u 0.9 6.96 88 0.7 14.59 40 0.6 12.35 8 0.6 13.62 36 171

s3l 0.7 5.50 51 1.0 14.41 55 0.9 17.69 32 - - 0.0 138

s2u 4.1 5.76 781 6.2 8.89 263 4.1 13.76 886 3.3 12.48 469 2,399

s2l 1.8 5.12 458 1.7 9.49 128 1.1 12.70 242 1.3 13.84 279 1,107

Sub Total 1,686 597 1,168 1,742 5,193



Table 13-10 In-Place Coal Resources Summary for BC by Coal Seam and Inferred Resource Classification (kilotonnes), reported as of

February 20, 2020

Classification Inferred

Province British Columbia


Tonnage Seam

True Thick.

SR (Ave)

Tonnage True

Thick. SR

(Ave) Tonnage

True Thick.

SR (Ave)

Tonnage True

Thick. SR

(Ave) Tonnage


s7 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0

s6u - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0

s6m - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0

s6l - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0

s5u 1.6 0.03 0.1 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0

s5m 1.3 0.24 0.2 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0

s5l 4.9 0.08 3 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 3

s4u 1.0 5.22 4 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 4

s4m 0.5 0.82 0.0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0

s4l - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0

s3u 0.1 12.22 0.0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0

s3l - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 0

s2u 2.6 6.84 363 2.8 16.32 153 2.4 13.90 18 3.5 7.03 10 545

s2l 8.4 1.50 1007 10.1 4.22 1511 7.5 9.31 100 2.4 9.57 12 2,631

Sub Total 1,378 1,665 118 22 3,183



Figure 13-14 Seam 7 Cumulative Strip Ratios


Figure 13-15 Seam 6 Cumulative Strip Ratio


Figure 13-16 Seam 5 Cumulative Strip Ratios


13.5 RESOURCE COMPARISON

Table 13-11 presents a summary comparison of the most recent resource estimations for the Tent

Mountain Mine. No mining has taken place on the Property since 1980. Neither the Norwest resource nor

the Geoff Jordan and Assoc. resource estimation are considered compliant with NI 43-101 reporting.

Some of the key assumptions of the Norwest estimation were not reported.

Tamplin Resources Pty. Ltd used a 250 m depth cut-off as a limit for potential surface mineable resources,

whereas Dahrouge has used a 500 m depth cut-off, the reasoning for which is outlined in Section 13.4.

Tamplin Resources used a minimum seam thickness of 0.3 m, typically used in Australian resource

estimations, while Dahrouge used a minimum seam thickness of 0.6 m, typical of Canadian resource

estimations and reflecting the more structurally complex setting of Canadian Cordilleran coals. Maximum

stripping ratios and average density estimates were the same for both resources. Both were created

using VulcanTM modeling software and assumed a complex geology type. Both resources include Seams

S2, S4, S5, S6, and S7.

Dahrouge’s estimate had a larger available historical database as well as 76 new drillholes completed in

2018 and 2019. Tamplin Resources had only the then available historical drilling database. The Dahrouge

resource estimate shows an increase of about 35% from the Tamplin resource, which primarily reflects

the increased depth cut-off. Resources estimated by Dahrouge above a 300 m depth cut-off total 48.5 Mt,

while the resources estimated by Tamplin above a 250 m depth cut-off total 45 Mt.

Table 13-11 Comparison of Recent Tent Mountain Resource Estimates

Resource Year Measured

Mt Indicated

Mt Inferred

Mt #

drillholes

Depth cut-off

Min. Seam

Thickness S.R.

Density g/cm3

Dahrouge 2020 3,655 48,085 8,376 232 500 m 0.6 m ‹20:1 In-Situ

RD Grids

Tamplin 2018 - 37,000 8,000 115 250 m 0.3 m ‹20:1 1.45

Jordan 2017 - 61,780 2,677 138 600 m 1.0/2.0 m ‹10:1 1.40/1.45

Norwest 2005 - 68,438 1,220 130 - - - -


14 ADJACENT PROPERTIES

The area immediately south, west and northwest of the Tent Mountain Mine on the BC side of the border

has a long history of coking coal exploration and production from the Mist Mountain Formation. The

current and past producing coal mines and advanced-stage coal projects in the area are outlined in Table

14-1 and illustrated in Figure 14-1.

Table 14-1 Adjacent Coal Projects

Project Name Owner Type Years of

Operation Production

Distance from

Property

Michel Coal Project

North Coal Ltd. Surface 1964 – 1969 1993 – 1996

150,000 7

Crown Mountain

Jameson Resources

Proposed Open Pit

- None 23

Coal Mountain Teck

Resources Ltd Open Pit 2008 - 2019 2.5 Mt/year 9

Elkview Teck

Resources Ltd Open Pit 1970-present 7 Mt/ year 23

North Coal

The Michel Coal Project, owned by North Coal Ltd, borders Montem’s Tent Mountain Mine and includes

the Loop Ridge, Michel Head and Tent Mountain Deposits. The Tent Mountain Deposit includes a portion

of Pit 5 and all of Pit 3 from the historical Tent Mountain Mine described in Section 6.6 of this report. The

Loop Ridge Property includes the historical McGillivray Pit, which produced 60,000 to 100,000 t of coal

between 1964 and 1969 under operation by the Crowsnest Pass Coal Company (CNPC). The McGillivray

Pit was reopened in 1995 by McGillivray Mining Ltd and produced another 20,000 t of coal, before being

purchased by Fording Coal Ltd. in 1996, after which an additional 30,000 t of coal was mined (North Coal,

2018). North Coal acquired the coal leases in 2013, produced a Preliminary Economical Assessment in

2014 and a Prefeasibility Study (PFS) in 2016 for the Michel Head and Loop Ridge Deposits. After

additional exploration in 2017, the Tent Mountain Deposit was included in the PFS and a revised Project

Description was submitted in August 2018, outlining a proposed annual production of between 2.3 and

4 Mt of raw coal over a 30-year mine life (North Coal, 2018). The Project is currently awaiting regulatory

approvals. The Authors have not been able to verify these production figures or any reserve/resource

information on this property and note that these figures are not necessarily indicative of any coal

resources at Montem’s Tent Mountain Mine.

Teck

Teck’s Elkview Mine, which has been in operation since 1970, is located approximately 23 km to the

northwest of the Property and has a production capacity of 7.0 Mt of clean coal annually and a current

mine life of 38 years (Teck, 2019).

Teck’s Coal Mountain Operation is located approximately 9 km to the south of the Property and ceased

operation in 2019. As of 2014, the operation had produced approximately 60 Mt of clean coal, averaging

2.5 Mt per year (Teck, 2014). The Authors have not been able to verify these production figures and note

that these figures are not necessarily indicative of any coal resources on the Tent Mountain Property.


Jameson Resources

Jameson Resources’ Crown Mountain Project, located approximately 23 km north of the Tent Mountain

Mine, completed a PFS of the project in 2014, which was updated in April 2017. The 2014 PFS estimated

a run of mine Coal Reserve of 56 Mt, of which 50 Mt are proven (NWP Coal Canada Ltd., 2014). The project

is currently in the pre-application phase of the environmental assessment process. As noted above, these

reserve numbers are not necessarily indicative of any coal resources on the Tent Mountain Property.


Figure 14-1 Adjacent Properties Map


15 INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS

This report presents reviewed results of available historical reports and data that have been supported

by a 2018 and 2019 exploration program. Not all the historical exploration information was available,

but the Authors are satisfied that the information used to create the 2020 resource estimate presented

in this report are reflective of the coal seam thickness and quality present at Tent Mountain. The 2018

and 2019 exploration and coal quality drilling validated historical results and the Authors consider the

historical exploration to be of professional quality and can see no reason for the results presented to have

been intentionally misleading.

The presented Resource at Tent Mountain contains significant thicknesses of Medium Volatile

Bituminous coal under ASTM standards, that could be marketed as a semi-hard to HCC (Cameron and

Williams, 2020). Significant work has been undertaken to investigate the historical geological

interpretations and to confirm historical exposures, trenches, adits, and drill sites in order to model and

plan future exploration programs. Access by road and historical exploration trails is generally good and

has been upgraded during the 2018 and 2019 drill programs. Proximity to rail and municipal

infrastructure and services is also good, with the towns of Coleman and Blairmore (combined population

about 4,000) approximately 20 and 25 km to the east by road via Hwy 40/ Hwy 3. The Canadian Pacific

rail line runs through Coleman and connects with the main CNR east-west line for access to Vancouver

and Prince Rupert ports.

There are currently four producing coking coal mines in the Sparwood/Elk Valley area, BC. All four mines

are owned by Teck Resources Ltd and they have an aggregate annual capacity of approximately 25 Mt.

Mining personnel for the Project could potentially be sourced from Coleman and Blairmore or other

surrounding settlements.

There are two surface access restrictions on portions of the Property. The Alberta portion of the Property

is located within the Mountain Goat and Bighorn Sheep Range (Figure 4-2). In this area, any disturbances

that may have direct or indirect adverse effects, including permanent alteration of habitat must be

avoided. Additionally, the entire Property is located within the Grizzly Bear Habitat Protection Zone

(Figure 4-2); regulations require that Montem provide and preserve either core or secondary grizzly bear

habitat. Montem implanted a ‘wildlife monitoring’ program in 2018 which included daily monitoring of

wildlife and installation of wildlife cameras in favorable terrain most suited to goat and bighorn sheep.

These cameras were monitored on a weekly basis to track movements of wildlife on the Property. The

entirety of the Property lies within the Category 4 land zone with respect to coal exploration and

development as designated by the 1976 Coal Development Policy for Alberta. This land category allows

for exploration to be permitted under appropriate control and surface or underground mining or in-situ

operations may be considered subject to proper assurances respecting protection of the environment

and reclamation of disturbed lands.

The Authors conclude that the Property contains significant coal resources which warrant further

exploration. The Property is considered one of merit.


16 RECOMMENDATIONS

The Property contains significant coal resources at extractable depths as supported by historical mining

operations and the current 2020 resource. The economics of coal extraction have not been evaluated as

part of this report. The Property is considered one of merit and further exploration and definition is

warranted. The Authors recommend further work in several categories as detailed below.

Resource Definition

Additional drilling is recommended in areas where the resource remains in the Inferred category to

increase resource classifications to Indicated and Measured. 1,000-2,000 m of rotary air blast or reverse

circulation drilling should be completed to confirm the extent of the resources to the north, along the

Crowsnest Syncline, to confirm historical drill results and to target secondary structures. Currently there

are data gaps in the understanding of secondary thrust faults and how they affect coal seams and interact

with large regional faults on the Property; therefore, drilling should also target areas of known structural

complexity, such as the area around Pit 2.

A program of 1,000 m rotary air blast and 500 m large diameter core drilling is also recommended on

the BC portion of the Property. No recent drilling or coal quality data exists on this part of the Property

and varying historical interpretations exist in the area. Drilling should focus on shallow coal

intersections, confirming historical results and targeting primary and secondary structures to strengthen

the interpretation of the deposit to the south.

Downhole geophysical logging and ATV/OTV surveys of all drillholes is recommended to consistently

identify coal seams and geologic structures.

Historical Workings Definition

Between 400-600 m of sonic drilling is recommended to better define the historical workings and mine

dumps on the Property. There are no detailed records of the extent of the historical mine dumps on the

Property. Several rotary air blast drillholes in 2018 and 2019 intersected significant amounts of mine

dump material while targeting coal intersections and had to be abandoned due to the unfavorability of

the material for rotary air blast drilling; sonic drilling is a better method for drilling mine dump material.

The focus of the sonic drilling should be on intersecting bedrock to determine the extent of the mine

dump west of Pit 4 as well as within Pit 2 (Figure 6-2), which was backfilled with an unknown amount of

waste material upon completion of historical mining.

Coal Quality

Bulk sampling should be completed on all economic coal seams on the Property. This could be completed

by 6” or 9” LDC coring or by test pit excavation in areas where coal is exposed in the historical pit walls.

The most economical approach would be for test pit excavation and the possibility exists to collect bulk

samples of Seam S4 and Seam S5 from one of the historical Pit 4 benches. Near surface coal in this location

would have only been exposed at surface since the completion of mining in 1980, minimizing the depth

limit of oxidation. Bulk samples for Seam S7 and Seam S6 may require large diameter drilling, which

would target shallow intersections based on the 2019 geological model.

The coal from the bulk samples should be used to complete pilot wash plant testing and confirm the

flowsheet of the coal preparation plant. Additional washability and detailed analysis on a range of size

fractions should be completed to increase confidence in the 2018 and 2019 coal quality analysis and to


confirm the optimum size and density at which clean coal composites should be prepared. Petrographic

analyses and detailed coking coal tests, including carbonisation studies, should be completed on

simulated clean coal products to further define market specifications for the resource.

Geotechnical Analysis

Between 400-600 m of HQ split-tube diamond drilling is recommended on the BC Coal Lease. Drilling

should be spatially distributed across the area targeting both the hanging wall and footwall of the

proposed pit shell. Detailed geotechnical logging should be conducted at the drill rig. Unconfined

compressive strength (UCS) samples should be taken every 30 m, and direct shear samples taken as well

when suitable samples are identified. Point load tests should be taken every 3 m or at every change in

lithology, with more tests made near UCS sample sites. Program should be reviewed and evaluated by a

geotechnical engineer.

Geochemical Analysis

The geotechnical drillholes can be multipurpose drillholes and serve for geochemical analysis on the BC

portion of the Property.

Samples should be submitted for static testing (acid-base accounting and elemental composition)

followed by a subset of samples for phase 2 testing at a later time (shake flask extractions and kinetic

testing).

Hydrogeological Study

The monitoring wells and vibrating wire piezometers installed in 2018 and 2019 should be monitored

on a regular basis to increase understanding of the interaction of the Pit 4 and Pit 2 lakes with the

surrounding environment. This data will be relevant for both mine design and environmental studies on

the Property.

Packer tests should be performed in the geotechnical HQ drillholes on the BC portion of the Property to

evaluate hydraulic conductivity near proposed pit walls of varying rock types and structures.


17 REFERENCES

AER. 2015. Coal Mine Atlas Operating and Abandoned Coal Mines in Alberta. Serial Publication:

ST45.

Beresford, E.W. 1977. 1976 Exploration on B.C. Coal Licences 21 and 22. British Columbia Assessment

Report, Open File 450.

Bob Leach Pty Ltd. 2016. Preliminary Review of Coal Quality at Tent Mountain, Alberta, Canada.

Internal Report prepared for Montem Resources Corp. and Westmoreland Coal Company.

Booth, J.K.B., and Leigh, O.E., 1973. Report on Coleman Collieries Ltd – Prepared for Northern and

Central Gas Corporation.

Bustin, R.M. 1979. Structural Features of Coal Measures of the Kootenay Formation, South-eastern

Canadian Rockies. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of

Doctor of Philosophy.

Cameron, D and Williams, A. 2019. Tent Mountain Legacy Coal Quality Data Assessment. Internal

Report prepared for Montem Resource Corp.

Cameron, D and Williams, A. 2020. Coal Quality Assessment to Support Tent Mountain FS. Technical

Report prepared for Montem Resource Corp.

“Company overview of Prairie Mines & Royalty Ltd” (n.d.). Retrieved from

http://www.bloomberg.com/

Dunlop, D and Bustin, R.M. 1987. Depositional environments of the coal bearing Mist Mountain

Formation, Eagle Mountain Southeastern Canadian Rocky Mountains. Bulletin of Canadian

Petroleum Geology, v. 34 p.71-90.

Engler, R.F. 2014. Tent Mountain 2014 - Coal Quality Evaluation Program. Moose Mountain Technical

Services.

Geological Survey of Canada. 1996, Tent Mountain Map-Area, Open File 3158

Geoff Jordan Associates Corp. 2017, Tent Mountain Coal Property Alberta. 128p.

Gibson, D.W. 1979. The Morrissey and Mist Mountain Formations - Newly Defined

Lithostratigraphic Units of the Jura-Cretaceous Kootenay Group, Alberta and British Columbia;

Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, vol. 27, no. 2, p. 183-208.

Gibson, D.W. 1985. Stratigraphy, Sedimentology and Depositional Environments of the Coal-

Bearing Jurassic-Cretaceous Kootenay Group, Albert and British Columbia. Geological Survey

of Canada Bulletin 357, p. 108.

Gorham, J., Miller, W.S, and Ulry, B.J. 2013. Technical report on the Elan Coal Property, Alberta,

Canada. Prepared for Elan Coal Ltd., Report for NI 43-101,

Greensmith, Victor. 1975. The Overall Development of the Coal Reserves of Tent Mountain –

Preliminary Feasibility Report Volume 1. Coleman Colliers Limited.

Hall, R.L. 1984. Lithostratigraphy and Biostratigraphy of the Fernie Formation (Jurassic) in the

Southern Canadian Rocky Mountains: In: The Mesozoic of Middle North America, D.F. Stott and D.

Glass (eds.). Calgary, Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 9, p. 233-247.


Hughes, J.D., Klatzel-Mudry, L. and Nikols, D.J. 1989. A Standardized Coal Resource/Reserve

Reporting System for Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Paper 88-21, p. 18.

Macdonald, D.E. and Hamilton, W.N., 1981. Limestone Prospects in the Vicinity of Crowsnest Pass: A

Preliminary Assessment. Alberta Geological Survey Open File 82-10, p 41 plus appendices.

Macdonald, D.E., Langenberg, C. W., Gentzis, T., 1989, A Regional Evaluation of Coal Quality in the

Foothills/Mountains Region of Alberta. Alberta Research Council Earth Sciences Report 89-2, p.

49 plus appendices and maps.

Marston Canada Ltd. 2008. Technical Report on Coal Resources and Reserves of the Elkview

Property. Prepared for Fording Canadian Coal Trust and Teck Cominco Limited for NI 43-101

Montem Resources Limited, 2018. Montem Resources Prospectus.

Norris, D.K. 1959. Type Section of the Kootenay Formation, Grass y Mountain, Alberta; Journal of Alberta

Society of Petroleum Geologists, vol. 7, p. 223-233.

Norris, D.K. 1971. The geology and coal potential of the Cascade Coal Basin. In: A guide to the

geology of the eastern Cordillera along the Trans-Canada Highway between Calgary, Alberta

and Revelstoke, British Columbia. Alberta Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 19, p. 23-40.

North Coal. 2018. Revised Project Description – Michel Coal Project. Report submitted to BC

Environmental Assessment Office and Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.

Norwest Corporation, 2005. Technical Report, Tent Mountain Coal Property, Alberta and British

Columbia, 54 p.

NWP Coal Canada Ltd. 2014. Crown Mountain Coking Coal Project – Project Description Executive

Summary.

Paul Dyson Consultants and Holdings Limited. 1977. Geological Report for the Tent Mountain Area,

for Coleman Collieries.

Panchysyn, E.J. and Jackson, G. 1973. Geological Exploration Report on the Tent Mountain Area.

Prepared for Mannix Co.

Peston, K. and Sanders, R. 1993. Estimating the In Situ Relative Density of Coal. Australian Coal

Geology, p. 22-26.

Price, R. A. 1962. Fernie Map-Area, East Half Alberta and British Columbia. Geological Survey Paper

61-24, p. 65.

Richardson, R. J. H., Langenberg, C.W., Chao, D. K. and Fietz, D. 1992. Coal Compilation Project –

Blairmore. Alberta Geological Survey, Open File Report 1992-5, p. 26 plus appendices.

Smith, L.A. 1982. Geological Evaluation of the Tent Mountain Area. Prepared for Coleman Collieries

Ltd.

Smith, G.C., Cameron, A.R., Bustin, R.M. 1994. Coal Resources of the Western Canada Sedimentary

Basin. Alberta Geological Survey Atlas of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, Chapter 33.

Stott, D.F. 1984. Cretaceous sequences of the Foothills of the Canadian Rocky Mountains. In: The

Mesozoic of the Middle North America, D.F Stoot and D.J. Glass (eds.), Calgary, Canadian Society of

Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 9, p. 85-107.


Tamplin Resources Pty Ltd. 2018. Coal Resources for the Tent Mountain Project Canadian

Sedimentary Basin, Albert and British Columbia, Canada. JORC Competent Person Report p. 133.

Teck. 2019. “About Elkview” Retrieved from

http://www.teck.com/operations/canada/operations/elk-view/elkview

Teck Coal Limited. 2014. Coal Mountain Phase 2 Project Description – Executive Summary. Report

Submitted to Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency

Westmoreland. 2014. “Westmoreland completes acquisition of Sherritt coal operations; announces intention to prepay WML Notes” (2014, April 29). Retrieved from http://westmoreland.com


COMPETENT PERSONS STATEMENTS

‘Signed and Sealed’

_______________________________

Matthew Carter, P. Geo

Dated: April 7, 2020

The information in the report, to which this statement is attached, that relates to Coal Resources, is based on information compiled under the supervision of Mr. Bradley Ulry, Mr. Matthew Carter and Mr. John Gorham: Competent Persons who are registered as Professional Geologists with the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of Alberta. Mr. Bradley Ulry, Mr. Matthew Carter and Mr. John Gorham are employed by Dahrouge Geological Consulting Ltd.. They are all Competent Persons independent from the issuer of this statement, Montem Resources Alberta Operations Ltd. Mr. Bradley Ulry, Mr. Matthew Carter and Mr. John Gorham have sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposit under consideration, and to the activity being undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the JORC code. Mr. Bradley Ulry, Mr. Matthew Carter and Mr. John Gorham have acquired experience principally from coal exploration programs in central and southern Alberta. Mr. Bradley Ulry, Mr. Matthew Carter and Mr. John Gorham consent to the inclusion in the report of the matters based on their information in the form and context in which it appears. The Coal Resources and Exploration Targets for coal seams S7, S6, S5, S4 and S2 at Tent Mountain, presented in this report, have been classified and reported in accordance with the “Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves” (December 2012), prepared by the Joint Ore Reserves Committee of the Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Australian Institute of Geoscientists and Minerals Council of Australia. ‘Signed and Sealed’ ‘Signed and Sealed’

_______________________________ _______________________

Bradley Ulry, P. Geo John Gorham, P. Geol.

Dated: April 7, 2020 Dated: April 7, 2020


JORC CODE (2012) TABLE 1– REPORTING OF EXPLORATION RESULTS &

MINERAL RESOURCES

JORC Code, 2012 Edition – Table 1

Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary

Section 1

Sampling Techniques and

Data

Sampling techniques

Nature and quality of sampling (eg. cut channels, random chips, or specific specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.

Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems used.

Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public Report.

In cases where ‘industry standard’ work has been Ae this would be relatively simple (eg ‘reverse circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g charge for fire assay’). In other cases more explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed information.

• The historical database used for geological and resource modelling was restricted to that collected between 1972 and 1977 due to quality constraints. See Section 6, 8, 9, 10 and 11 of report for details.

• Historical database used includes 119 core holes, 73 rotary holes, 3 adits and geological field observations. Drillhole information was ranked for reliability; 36 holes were excluded as they were deemed to be unreliable due to incomplete or unreliable survey data, no lithology logs or geophysical logs

• Drill programs carried out by Montem in 2018 and 2019 included rotary air blast (RAB), reverse circulation (RC), HQ coring and large diameter (6”) coring for coal quality (LDC). 19 holes were drilled in 2018 (12 RAB, 4 LDC and 3 HQ core holes) with downhole deviation, geophysical and acoustic televiewer surveys conducted on most holes. In 2019, 57 holes were drilled (30 RAB, 6 RC, 14 LDC and 7 HQ core holes) with downhole deviation, geophysical, acoustic televiewer, optical televiewer collected on most holes and full sonic wave surveys conducted on 13 holes (Section 9).

• In 2018/ 2019, RAB or RC pilot holes were used to test proposed LDC locations; a downhole geophysical log was completed, and results were used to identify coal seam(s) suitable for LDC coring. Coal seams were considered ideal if greater than 4 m thick and at a depth between 20 (below oxidation limit) to 90 m (depth limit of the drill rig) below surface; rig was shifted 2 to 5 m on the drill pad to avoid interaction with the pilot hole; 10” Surface casing was advanced into the bedrock and then 9” RAB open hole drilling was carried out to approximately 1.5 to 3 m above the target coal seam identified from the geophysics at which point 6” large diameter coring was carried out until approximately 1.5 m below the coal seam and the hole was terminated. Core was photographed and geologically logged. In 2018, coal was sampled at the drillsite. In 2019, the coal was placed in core boxes and sealed with plastic sheeting and lids to ensure no material was lost. The core was then transported to a secondary facility at Summit Creek Cabins, near Hazell, AB where it was stored in a -15°C freezer until ready for sampling. In 2018, each distinct coal seam comprised one sample and in 2019 the sample intervals were selected based on the downhole geophysical logs of the LDC drillholes. Roof and floor dilution samples were also collected at


Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary the beginning and end of each coal seam. LDC samples were submitted for coal quality test work.

• In 2019 LDC coal samples used split tube coring. The core was geologically logged, photographed and sampled with intervals chosen from depth-corrected logs including roof and floor dilution samples. LDC samples were submitted for coal quality test work.

• In 2018 samples were sent to Birtley Coal and Mineral Testing Division of GWIL Industries Inc. (“Birtley”) in Calgary, Alberta where the samples were weighed and air-dried. Prior to crushing, an apparent relative density determination was made to aid in determining recovery and composite choices. Samples were then crushed to pass minus 12.5 mm if required and screened to ±0.25 mm. Subsamples of ¼ or less, depending upon mass, were taken and a raw coal head sample was assayed for proximate analysis, sulphur, FSI (free swelling index) and LT% (light transmittance) to determine level of oxidation.

• In 2019, samples were shipped to ALS Coal Services’ laboratory in Richlands, Queensland, Australia. Sampling procedures by ALS were in accordance with AS2617 (seams, insitu), AS4264.1 Sampling Procedures outlined in Section 10.2.

• In 2018 HQ drilling, the core was geologically and geotechnically logged and photographed (wet and dry). Detailed geotechnical logging included samples for laboratory unconfined compressive strength (UCS), triaxial strength and direct-shear testing as well as point-load testing at 3m intervals, with more concentrated testing where a geotechnical sample was collected. Geochemical sampling consisted of continuous core samples for acid rock drainage analysis.

• In 2019 HQ drill coring employed a triple tube setup. Core processing was similar to that of 2018 however was performed at a mobile core logging facility at the drill rig.

• Historical sample analysis included raw sizing with material screened at ¾”, ¼”, 28 mesh and 100 mesh and the weight % obtained. The plus 100 mesh size fractions were separated at the following specific gravities: 1.35, 1.40, 1.45, 1.50, 1.60, and 1.90. Some designated cores were tested at a lesser number of gravities. The minus 28 mesh and minus 100 mesh fractions were subjected to froth floatation tests. Ash (%) and FSI was determined on all gravity fractions except the 1.90 sink (ash only). Head samples were withdrawn at each stage and checked against composite of float fractions. Composites were then prepared from individual 60 mesh pulps to correspond to a clean coal ash level of either 9% to 11%. These were analyzed for proximate including FSI, Sulphur, and Btu.



• In 2019, surface soil testing for geotechnical purposes was carried out. 16 test pits on the Property and along the planned haul road were dug by excavator to a maximum depth of 5 m. Soils were described, sampled and sent for laboratory analysis. 14 sonic drill holes totaling 277 m were drilled; standard penetration tests (SPT’s) were performed at 1.5 m or 3 m intervals as the drillholes were advanced. Shelby tube samples were also collected at the discretion of the geotechnical engineer/geologist onsite and sent for analysis.

Drilling techniques

Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method, etc).

• Historical cored holes were NQ (47.6mm) and HQ (63.5mm) single tube core. Open holes were generally 125mm diameter. Holes drilled at a range of inclinations and directions to intersect strata nearly perpendicular to dip.

• For 2018 RAB drilling twelve vertical 5” diameter open holes totalled 1211.25 m. The drill rigs utilized 6” surface casing, which was removed following completion of the downhole geophysical and deviation surveys.

• For 2018 LDC drilling four vertical 6” core holes totalling 255.33 m were drilled. RAB pilot holes were drilled and logged to identify coring targets. LDC was carried out to ~ 1.5 m below the coal seam.

• For 2018 HQ diamond drilling, three HQ core holes totalling 420 m were drilled. The rig was oriented using an Azimuth Positioning System II (APS II). Holes were cased with HW surface casing, which was left in place following completion of the hole.

• For 2019 RAB drilling thirty 4-1/2” diameter open holes, totalling 3,822.57 m were drilled. Drillholes were oriented both vertically and angled depending on their purpose. Angled holes were lined up using an APS II.

• For 2019 RC drilling, six 5 ½” diameter holes were completed totalling 452 m. The drill rig utilized 7” welded surface casing, which was left in place following completion of the each drillhole.

• For 2019 LDC drilling, 14 vertical 6” holes, totalling 1,098.78 m were completed. Two holes were redrilled due to poor coal recovery. RAB or RC pilot holes were drilled and geophysically logged to identify coring targets. LDC was carried out to ~ 1.5 m below the coal seam (s).

• For 2019 HQ diamond drilling, seven HQ core holes totalling 1,545 m were drilled. The rig was oriented with an APS II. Holes were cased with HW surface casing, which was left in place following completion of the hole.



Drill sample recovery

Method of recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results assessed.

Measures taken to maximize sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the samples.

Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse material.

• Historical coal recovery in historical cored holes was poor to moderate, ranging from a low of 38% to a high of 100% for the identified seam groups with an average coal recovery of approximately 73%. This is due to the extremely friable nature of the coal and considerable internal micro faulting within the seams which is typical of the area.

• For 2018/2019 LDC coring, a total of 59 samples were collected for coal recovery evaluation and density of coal quality sampling. Recoveries ranged from 36% to 100% with an average of 87%. Roof and floor dilution samples were also collected at the beginning and end of each coal seam.

• The main factor influencing recovery appears to have been friability and shearing due to complex structural environment. Historical observations suggested greater core loss in bright coal bands of higher ash content. This may have led to some sample bias.

Logging Whether core and chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, mining studies and metallurgical studies.

Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc.) photography.

The total length and percentage of the relevant intersections logged.

• For historical holes, chips and cores were logged in the field and then corrected to downhole geophysics. Cored holes had moderately detailed lithological records. All holes were wireline logged where possible. The minimum suite was sidewall density and gamma neutron tools. The standard and level of detail is considered appropriate for Mineral Resource estimation. No photographs exist of samples or core. Aggregate length of historical drilling used for Resource calculation was 30,026 m excluding poorly documented or unlogged holes.

• For 2018/2019 RAB and RC drilling, chips were collected every meter and logged by a geologist. These drillholes were used as pilot holes for identifying suitable coal seams for large diameter coring, for infill drilling and, to provide open holes for monitoring well installations and piezometer installations. 48 holes totalling 5,485 m were drilled.

• For 2018/2019 LDC, core was immediately photographed and geologically logged. In 2018, coal was sampled at the drillsite. In 2019, the coal was placed in core boxes and sealed with plastic sheeting and lids to ensure no material was lost. The core was then transported to a secondary facility at Summit Creek Cabins, near Hazell, AB where it was stored in a -15°C freezer until ready for sampling. In 2018, each distinct coal seam comprised one sample and in 2019 the sample intervals were selected based on the downhole geophysical logs of the LDC drillholes. Roof and floor dilution samples were also collected at the beginning and end of each coal seam. All cores were logged and photographed.



18 holes were drilled for a total of 1,334 m.

• For 2018/2019 HQ drilling, holes were logged and photographed and selectively sampled for geotechnical and geochemical information. 10 HQ holes were drilled, totaling 1,965 m.

• In 2018/2019 downhole with deviation surveys, density, gamma ray, caliper logs and ATV surveys were completed on most holes. In 2019 OTV and full-wave sonic surveys were added (See Table 9.2 and section 9.6 of report). These logs were used for depth correction, validation and structural measurements.

• The geological and Resource model were constructed using a database of 232 drillholes, including the 76 holes drilled between 2018 and 2019 and 156 historical drillholes, totalling 37,398.87 m (Table 11-2 in this report). A total of 36 drillholes were excluded from the model due to insufficient or conflicting location information (Table 11-3 in this report). An additional 29 surveyed measured sections generated from trench mapping and high-resolution drone imagery were incorporated into the model. These datapoints were used for geological control (Table 8-2 and Table 8-3).

Sub-sampling techniques and sample preparation

If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core taken.

If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc. and whether sampled wet or dry.

For all sample types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample preparation technique.

Quality control procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximize representivity of samples.

Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ material collected, including for instance results for field duplicate/second-half sampling.

Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being sampled.

• For historical samples, preparation, subsampling and quality control procedures were ensured by the use of certified commercial labs in Canada and the US, employing recognised QA procedures and following International Standards for coal testing (ATSM). For core samples geophysical logs were used to identify rock types, including coal intersected in the hole. Core was measured to determine an overall recovery (reported in percent). Recovered core was measured and compared to the coal interval thickness determined from the geophysical log suite. Collected samples were cleaned of any mud contamination and placed in individual plastic bags. The bags were labelled on the outside with both the drillhole and sample number and sealed with plastic tape to prevent excessive moisture loss. The sample bags were placed together in a collection bag for the core hole before being placed in palletized containers and shipped to an independent laboratory for analysis. No special security methods were identified for the shipping and storage of samples.

• For historical bulk sampling between 1974 and 1979 used for coal quality determinations, representative samples were collected by driving 3 adits into unoxidized material; before bulk sampling, preliminary samples were obtained from various points in the adit and evaluated for oxidation, using FSI testing; adits were driven in coal, until unoxidized coal was reached, where a crosscut


Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary was driven from hanging wall to footwall and a representative sample across the crosscut face was taken. If this yielded favourable results, a bulk sample that was deemed representative of the seam was collected, sealed in barrels and shipped to the laboratory of Coal Science and Minerals Testing (Birtley Labs), Calgary, Alberta. Approximately four to five tons of raw coal was recovered from each seam in each adit.

• In 2018 sampling, core was removed from the core barrel and placed in plastic-lined 1.5 m wooden core boxes for logging and photography by the onsite geologist. Each distinct coal interval, in addition to the roof and floor dilution samples, were placed immediately into plastic bags with a sample number and sealed. The interval and bag number were marked on the bag. Each coal interval was double bagged and tightly sealed as a precaution. Samples were stored in cold storage until they were shipped to the lab.

• In 2019 split tubes were used; core was photographed immediately and then carried in the split tubes to the mobile logging facility at the drill site and photographed again. The core was logged in detail by the onsite geologist and then transferred into plastic lined wooden core boxes. The boxes were sealed with plastic poly sheeting and wooden lids. The site geologist transported the samples to the secured -15°C cold storage, where samples were sealed in 50-gallon plastic barrels and stored inside a locked trailer until shipment to the lab. Because of the nature of coal quality analysis, all of the coal was sampled, and field duplicates were not taken. Detailed procedures are found in Sections 6, 9 and 10.

Quality of assay data and laboratory tests

The nature, quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or total.

For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc., the parameters used in determining the analysis including instrument make and model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their derivation, etc.

Nature of quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks, duplicates, external

• Historical and 2018/2019 coal analysis was carried out at independent certified laboratories to ASTM standards. Details are presented in Section 7 and 10. Birtley Engineering Canada and its successor Birtley Coal and Mineral testing (Calgary) has been the primary laboratory for historical and current work. As part of their current certification by the Coal Association of Canada (CAC) they participate in relevant round robin checks and other routine checking procedures to ensure they meet the required accuracy for each test. They have been part of these tests since their inception; however, Birtley have advised they are unsure of details applied in the 1970’s therefore it is unclear whether the historical Tent Mountain analyses involved blind assaying as part of quality control.

• Laboratories used for coal analysis during the 2018 and 2019 coring programs



laboratory checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been established.

(Birtley and ALS Coal Services’ laboratory in Richlands) have established industry experience. 2018 program coal samples were analyzed by Birtley using ASTM D2013, D3302, D3173, D3174, D3175, D4239, D720, D5263, D5515, D2639, D3682, D2795, and D4371 procedures. Birtley adheres to ASTM and ISO preparation and testing specifications and have quality control processes in place. They have participated in the International Canadian Coal Laboratories Round Robin Series (CANSPEX) since its inception. They are also part of the ISO Technical Committee for Canada for TC27 and its associated subcommittees for coal preparation and coal testing. 2019 coal samples were analysed by ALS Coal Services’ laboratory in Richlands using accredited tests AS1038.3, AS1038.6.4, AS1038.12.1, AS1038.12.2, AS1038.12.4.1, AS1038.20, AS1038.6.4, AS1038.6.4, AS1038.16, BS1016.14, AS1038.21.1.1, AS3881, AS1038.5, AS1038.1, AS1038.6.3.3, AS1038.3, AS 1038.14.3, AS1038.10.4 and non-accredited tests AS2519 and AS1038.22. Sampling by ALS is done in accordance with AS2617 (seams, insitu), AS4264.1 Sampling Procedures and AS4264.4 Determination of Precision and Bias and acceptance and reporting of results is done in accordance with AS1038.16. ALS is regularly audited by external auditors against ISO – 17025 standards.

Verification of sampling and assaying

The verification of significant intersections by either independent or alternative company personnel.

The use of twinned holes.

Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data storage (physical and electronic) protocols.

Discuss any adjustment to assay data.

• Coal intersections used in the geological model were verified by geophysical measurements. Montem’s consultants, Dahrouge Geological Consultants (Dahrouge) completed a 100% validation of the 2018-2019 work; a 100% validation of historic drillhole locations; and an approximate 75% spot check of coal seam intersections, creating an independent database for resource modelling.

• Not all data addressed in the historical summary reports and technical reports could be located by Dahrouge, and therefore, could not be used in this report. Twinned holes were not used.

• Drill hole collar, lithology and basic raw coal quality data is stored in a Excel database. All available source field records, lab reports, survey data etc. are stored in electronic form.

Location of data points

Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drillholes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource estimation.

• The topographic data surface is based on a Lidar topographic survey collected in 2017. No material surface disturbance has occurred since then.

• The generally close alignment of surveyed collars and LiDAR data support the notion that the validation process undertaken by previous studies is generally reliable. These historical collar locations are incorporated into the geological



Specification of the grid system used.

Quality and adequacy of topographic control.

model.

• All 2018/2019 collar points were surveyed in UTM NAD83 Zone 11, using a Topcon RTK system with an accuracy of ±10 mm horizontally, and ±15 mm vertically.

Data spacing and distribution

Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results.

Whether the data spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and classifications applied.

Whether sample compositing has been applied.

• The Tent Mountain Project covers an area of ~1,683.1 ha. The modelling database uses 156 historical and 76 current (2018/2019) holes totalling 37,298.87 m. 578 historical structural non-coal and coal outcrop mapping points and 336 surface and subsurface structural control points from the 2019 program, including roadcut and drone measured sections, were used in the development of the model’s structural framework.

• The historical dataset reflects the standards and exploration targets of the time. There is a bias in the historical dataset towards information on the S4 and S5 seams which represents the principal open cut targets. Conversely, the historical surface mapping data is biased towards the lowermost S2 seam due to its common exposure. There are also high concentrations of data around mostly mined out shallower coal occurrences likely were amenable to shorter term open cut operations. The historical dataset contains significant variability. These data gaps were addressed in the 2018/2019 drilling and mapping programs, with particular focus on LDC drilling for improved recovery and greater continuity of coal quality data.

• The data spacing and distribution is considered by the Competent Persons to be collectively sufficient to establish the degree of geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource Estimation and classifications applied.

Orientation of data in relation to geological structure

Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the deposit type.

If the relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation of key mineralized structures is considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if material.

• The coal resource at Tent Mountain resource is bounded by three major north-striking reverse faults and this geology results in a marked anisotropy to the deposit with shallow coal occurring along the strike and to either side of these faults. Many holes were drilled at angles to intersect seams as nearly perpendicular as feasible (Figures 13-3 to 13-7). Downhole deviation logs and collar surveys constrain drillhole data in 3D space

• The east west anisotropy to the deposit is geostatistically significant but it is also reasonably consistent and well understood.

Sample security The measures taken to ensure sample security. • No special sample security measures were adopted on this project because the

industry regards coal as a low value bulk commodity; the exploration samples


Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary were handled by project geologists and stored in a locked cold storage pending transport to the lab.

• Samples have a unique sample number that is provided for analysis. Each sample tag lists project name, drillhole, top and base of sample interval, and sample number.

Audits or reviews

The results of any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and data.

• The historical drillhole database was created and validated by Montem geological personnel during 2016 to 2017 with the addition of drillhole data and validation in 2019. This dataset is based on drilling and outcrop data collected from 1973 to 1982. Data from this period appears to be of a professional and consistent quality but due to its age the data used in the resource estimation cannot be directly confirmed. Data has been excluded where incomplete or not be constrained or confirmed.

• In 2019, the geological dataset and model was updated and validated using data from the 2018 and 2019 drill programs and surface mapping, with additional historical drill reports, cross sections and figures.

Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results


Mineral

tenement and

land tenure

status

Type, reference name/number, location and

ownership including agreements or material

issues with third parties such as joint ventures,

partnerships, overriding royalties, native title

interests, historical sites, wilderness or national

park and environmental settings.

The security of the tenure held at the time of

reporting along with any known impediments to

obtaining a license to operate in the area.

• The Tent Mountain Mine consists of 10 Alberta Freehold Tenements (all minerals expect gold and silver), 11 Alberta Coal Leases, 1 BC Coal Lease in addition to 10 Alberta Freehold (surface only) tenements hey by Montem (Table 4-1 to Table 4-4 and Figure 4-1) and is subject terms and conditions of an agreement outlined Section 4.4.

• Montem has an active Alberta Coal Mine Permit (C85-16G) and BC Mine Permit BC C-108 for the area of Tent Mountain; an active EPEA (No. 47679-02-00) which requires amendment to restart mining at Tent Mountain; and other agreements/permits including Road Use, Water Management Approval, BC Reclamation Permit, Licence of Occupation, Right of Entry and a Coal Exploration Permit (CEP 180001). Tenure and permitting details are presented in Section 4.5.

• All of the Tent Mountain Provincial Crown lands in Alberta are designated as Category 4, within which coal exploration may be permitted under appropriate control. Surface or under-ground mining or in-situ operations




may be permitted subject to proper assurances. The Province of British Columbia has no corresponding land designation for its coal licenses (Figure 4-2).

• Several Indigenous groups are located within 100 km of the project area. Montem currently consulting and engaging with the Indigenous peoples that have interest in the project area, in order to building relationships and develop an understanding of each group’s needs and internal processes.

• The targeted coal-bearing Mist Mountain Formation is naturally rich in selenium. In alkaline, aerobic conditions, elemental selenium and selenide minerals are oxidized releasing soluble selenate ions which can be transported in surface runoff. Large scale surface mining in the Elk Valley, British Columbia has enriched the Elk River in selenium. Any future mine development on the Property will require the development of a selenium management plan.

• The Alberta portion of the Property is located within the Mountain Goat and Bighorn Sheep sensitive areas. Disturbances that may have direct or indirect adverse effects, such as permanent alteration of habitat must be avoided.

• The Property is in a grizzly bear protection zone what requires preservation or core and secondary grizzly bear habitat.

• The Alberta Coal Leases fall within the Rocky Mountain Forest Reserve. This reserve is managed by the province primarily for resource development management and recreational use purposes, although the designation of wilderness areas has been used to restrict certain types of access for management of habitat and conservation purposes.

Exploration done

by other parties

Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by

other parties.

• Details of Property history and previous exploration are presented in Section 6. Coal at Tent Mountain was discovered by prospectors around 1910. Coal was extracted from two underground mines in the Boulton area. The workings were operated by the Spokane and Alberta Coal and Coke Co. who commenced drivage in 1922 and apparently ceased production in 1929. Total production is estimated to be less than 100,000 tonnes.

• Coleman Collieries Ltd. acquired the Property sometime prior to 1949. There are no detailed records of exploration programs prior to 1972. From 1973 to 1977 extensive exploration was carried out on the East Flank (Pit 4) and in North Boulton, Trail Hill and South Boulton areas (Table 6-2; Figure 6-1).




Three adits were driven in the east flank of Tent Mountain between 1975 and 1976 (Figure 6-2). Bulk samples of the coal seams were extracted and analysed. Geological maps, outcrop, trench data, and geological reports concerning the Property are available from a wide variety of sources and have been used to constrain geology, model surfaces and to assist with the structural interpretation of the project.

• Several historical Resource Estimates were made. In 1982, L.A. Smith Consulting and Development, LTD conducted a study titled the “Geological Evaluation of the Tent Mountain Area; Volume 1 and 2, which was a comprehensive assessment of remaining coal resources and potential reserves on the Project.

• In 2005, Sherritt International contracted Norwest to complete a Resource Estimate for the Tent Mountain Mine summarized in Table 6-4.

• In 2017, Geoff Jordan and Associates prepared the Tent Mountain Resource Estimate summarized in Table 6-5.

• In 2018, Tamplin Resources Pty. Ltd. prepared a Tent Mountain JORC Code (2012) Resource Report summarized in Table 6-6.

• Open pit mining has occurred extensively on this property since 1948. Production has been intermittent but significant amounts were extracted between 1948 and mining completion in 1980. Historic open cut operations occurred in 4 separate and distinct pits. Approximately 5.5 million tons of coal has been extracted from the 1 and 2 Pit (which are now amalgamated) between 1948 and 1975 (Dyson, 1977). Coal was extracted from the thickened 5 Seam zone in the axis of the Crowsnest Syncline. Production from 3 Pit occurred from 1952 to 1955 and from 1975 to 1979. Coal was extracted from a fault thickened 2 Seam section in the west dipping limb of the Crowsnest Syncline. This pit has been completely mined out. In 4 Pit coal was extracted from 5, 6 and 7 Seam in the Tent Syncline. Production commenced in 4 Pit in 1969 and operated continuously until 1971. A re-evaluation of ratios and economics lead to the re-opening of the pit in 1974. Mining ceased in this pit in 1979.5 Pit extracted coal from 5, 6 and 7 Seam on the east limb of Tent Syncline in the area commonly known as the East Flank. This pit opened in 1978 and operated continuously until mining operations ceased in 1980. Coal was extracted from the central portion of the East




Flank. Further mining potential exists along strike to both the north and south of this pit.

Geology Deposit type, geological setting and style of

mineralization.

• The Property is underlain mainly by The Jurassic-Cretaceous Mist Mountain Formation of the Kootenay Group (Figure 7-1 and 7-2), which contains the major coal deposits in the Front Ranges of south eastern British Columbia. Details of regional and Property geology are presented in Section 7.

• Coal seams of the Mist Mountain Formation outcrop on the Property in a general north-south direction for a strike length of approximately 5 km. The Mist Mountain Formation in the Eastern Front Ranges is typically overlain disconformably by the thickly bedded to massive conglomerate of the Cadomin Formation at the base of the Blairmore Group. On Tent Mountain, erosion has removed the Cadomin formation and the upper part of the Mist Mountain Formation. The Mist Mountain Formation in the Tent Mountain area is divided into three members which are described separately below with reference to Figures 7-3 and 7-4:

• The Mutz Member is the stratigraphically uppermost unit of the Mist Mountain Formation and comprises up to 90m of fluvial siltstone with minor interbedded claystone and coaly partings. The Mutz Member contains coal in seams. S5, S6 and S7 and a minor seam that lies between seam S5 and S6.

• The ridge forming Hillcrest Member lies conformably below the Mutz Member and consists is up to 30 m of fluvial channel sandstone deposits with interbedded siltstone and claystone. The Hillcrest Member contains no major coal zones.

• The recessive Adanac Member lies conformably below the Hillcrest and consists of shale, siltstone and fine grain sandstone, and includes at least two major coal seams; the S2 and S4 seams. The S3 seam is also intermittently present in the norther portion of the property, but this seam was not modelled due to its poor continuity along strike.

• The Moose Mountain Member forms the base of the Mist Mountain Formation and is a massive cliff-forming siliceous sandstone with minor amounts of mudstone, siltstone and coal. The Moose Mountain Member varies from 4 to 36m thickness. The contact between it and the underlying Jurassic Fernie Formation is abrupt and conformable.

• Coal-bearing sediments of the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous were strongly




deformed during the Late Cretaceous Laramide Orogeny resulting in the development of north to northwest trending folds and steeply dipping reverse faults, which locally causes the strata to be thrusted upwards. Coal zones are relatively continuous between major reverse faults however their thickness and distribution is variable within relatively short distances.The Tent Mountain Project has been divided into 4 structural domains bounded by 3 major thrusts (Ptolemy, Tent and Boulton) that dip to the west at angles of 30°-69° (Figure 7-3). The Crowsnest Syncline/Anticline lie west of the Boulton fault.

• There are at least five major economic coal horizons in the Mist Mountain formation at Tent Mountain (Table 7-1; Figure 7-4). The principal coal seams, in descending order are the number S7, S6, S5, S4 and S2 seams and are divided into 1, 2 or 3 plies.

• Geological Survey of Canada Paper 88-21 (GSC 88-21) outlines criteria that may be used to classify coal deposits. Based on these criteria, Tent Mountain is probably best classified as a complex, surface-mineable deposit as the deposit has been subjected to relatively high levels of tectonic deformation with tight folds and steeply inclined or overturned limbs common. Individual fault-bounded plates generally retain normal stratigraphic sequences although coal seam thicknesses are commonly structurally thickened or thinned.

• The Tent Mountain coals are considered Medium Volatile Coal under ASTM standards that could be marketed as semi-hard to hard coking coal (Cameron and Williams, 2020).

• Washability analysis demonstrates a clean product in the 8.30-13.10% ash range. Generally, the product coal is likely to be moderate in sulphur (~0.40-0.70) and phosphorus (<0.090) and exhibit CSN results of approximately 5-7 (Cameron and Williams, 2020).

Drill hole

Information

A summary of all information material to the understanding of the exploration results including a tabulation of the following information for all Material drillholes: easting and northing of the drill hole collar elevation or RL (Reduced Level –

• Drillhole information and coal intersections compiled for the current resource model are presented in Table 11-2 and Table 9-9 and Table 9-10 respectively of this Report.

• The historical data compilation located and compiled a total of 192 holes, including 119 core holes and 73 rotary holes, on or adjacent to the Property




elevation above sea level in meters) of the drill hole collar dip and azimuth of the hole down hole length and interception depth hole length. If the exclusion of this information is justified on the basis that the information is not Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this is the case.

(Table 6-2). These were drilled by Coleman Collieries between 1972 and 1977. Jordan (2017) completed a comprehensive review of the historical drillhole locations to verify collar locations and covert drillhole location survey data from the historical imperial coordinate system to the metric system (UTM NAD83 Zone 11). A topographic LiDAR survey was carried out on behalf of Westmoreland in June 2017 and was used in the current resource estimation.

• A total of 76 holes, totalling 8,784 m, were drilled for infill and resource purposes between 2018 and 2019 on the Property (Table 9-1; Table 9-2; Figure 9- 1). Hole types included air rotary, 6” large diameter core, reverse circulation and HQ diamond drillholes. All holes drilled in 2018 and 2019 were incorporated into the 2019 geological model and 2019 Resource Statement (See Appendix 1).

Data

aggregation

methods

In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are usually Material and should be stated. Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations should be shown in detail. The assumptions used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly stated.

• Coal intersections were generally sampled at 1 to 1.5m segments and composited as one sample per seam. Where applied, compositing of density was aggregated by volume; proximate analysis results, sulphur and washability aggregated by mass, and clean coal results aggregated by the sum product of yield and mass. These approaches are industry standards. Where quoted coal quality is for the full seam. Grade cut-offs were not applied to exploration results in the database. For resource modelling, a minimum seam thickness of 0.6 m; maximum internal ply interburden of 0.45 m and maximum stripping ratio of 20:1.

Relationship

between

mineralization

widths and

These relationships are particularly important in the reporting of Exploration Results. If the geometry of the mineralization with respect to the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be reported. If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear statement

• All thicknesses in the geological model from both historical and 2018/2019 data are apparent thickness (Table 9-9). Unless otherwise specified all thicknesses in this document are apparent thicknesses. Structural thickening of seams is known to occur on the Property. Many of the drillholes have been inclined in an attempt to intersect strata perpendicular to the strata dip. The geological modelling software combines drillhole orientation and intercepts from downhole logs with known and extrapolated structural




intercept lengths to this effect (e.g. ‘down hole length, true width not known’).

information from surface mapping to project geometry of coal seams. Resource modelling takes these geometries and, with constraints, calculates in-place volumes for the seams, with calculated interburden volumes removed.

Diagrams Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be included for any significant discovery being reported These should include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar locations and appropriate sectional views.

• See Figures 2-1 through 14-1 and Tables 1-1 through 14-1 in report

Balanced

reporting

Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable, representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration Results.

• There is no preferential reporting of results. The current Tent Mountain geological model is both a tool for creating resource estimates over the Project, and for targeting future exploration. Data has been extensively validated against raw records. Key further validation tools include the generation of cross sections and isopach plans and generic Leapfrog and Vulcan borehole validation checks. No material information has been excluded and outputs from the model honor data.

Other

substantive

exploration data

Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results; geochemical survey results; bulk samples – size and method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or contaminating substances.

• A geologic mapping program for increased structural control was conducted (Table 8-1; Figure 8-1), including roadcut (Table 8-2) and drone sections (Table 8-3). The 2019 field data was used to select between historic interpretations that were consistent with current control points. This data helped remove conflicting historic interpretations, while maintaining valuable information collected during historic mining.

• A drone survey of the Pit 4 and Pit 2 highwalls was conducted by SRK. The objective of the survey was to create a high-resolution, three-dimensional image in order to identify structural features and coal seam outcrops in the pit walls. Control points were used to aid in the georeferencing of the image. Once georeferenced, the images were loaded into 3D modelling software and aided in the structural and geological interpretation of the Property.

• A lake bathymetry survey was conducted on the Pit 4 Lake by McElhanney Ltd., of Calgary, Alberta. The objective of the survey was twofold; to determine the volume of water within the Pit 4 Lake, as well as map the lake bottom to create a detailed surface of the historical Pit 4 extents. These




results were merged with the 2017 LiDAR topography to better constrain the resource model.

• Five monitoring wells and 2 vibrating wire piezometer installations were completed by Matrix Solutions Inc., of Calgary, Alberta. Results collected from the monitoring wells and vibrating wire piezometers will be used to aid additional test work and evaluate the hydrogeological impacts on geotechnical pit stability.

• The LDC coring program in 2018 and 2019 yielded samples for extensive coal quality assessment as the historic bulk sample information cannot be directly incorporated into the geologic and resource models. Coal quality results are discussed in Section 12 of this report as well as a separate independent report by A&B Mylec (Cameron and Williams, 2020).

Further work The nature and scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or large-scale step-out drilling). Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this information is not commercially sensitive.

• Recommended 1000-2000 m of RAB or RC drilling to increase resource classifications to indicated and measured.

• Recommended 1000 m of RAB and 500 m LDC drilling on the British Columbia portion of the Property with downhole geophysical logging and ATV/OTV surveys of all holes to consistently identify coal seams and geologic structures.

• Recommended 400-600 m of sonic drilling to better define the historical workings and mine dumps on the Property. Focus should be on reaching bedrock to determine the extent of the dump west of Pit 4 as well as within Pit 2 (Figure 6-2), which was backfilled with an unknown amount of waste material upon completion of historical mining.

• Recommended bulk sampling of all economic coal seams on the Property for pilot wash plant testing and to confirm the flowsheet of the coal preparation plant. Additional washability and detailed analysis on a range of size fractions should be completed to increase confidence in the 2018 and 2019 coal quality analysis and to confirm the optimum size and density at which to prepare clean coal composites. Petrographic analysis and detailed coking coal tests, including carbonisation studies, should be completed on simulated clean coal products to further define market specifications for the resource.

• Recommended 400- 600 m of HQ split-tube diamond drilling on the British Columbia coal leases. Drilling should be spatially distributed across the area




targeting both the hanging wall and footwall of the proposed pit shell. Detailed geotechnical logging should be conducted at the drill rig. These holes can be multipurpose holes and serve for geochemical analysis on the British Columbia portion of the Property.

• Monitoring wells and vibrating wire piezometers installed in 2018 and 2019 should be monitored on a regular basis to increase understanding of the interaction of the Pit 4 and Pit 2 lakes with the surrounding environment. This data will be relevant for both mine design and environmental studies on the Property. Packer tests should be performed in the geotechnical HQ drillholes on the British Columbia portion of the Property to evaluate hydraulic conductivity near proposed pit walls of varying rock types and structures.

Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources


Database

integrity

Measures taken to ensure that data has not been corrupted by, for example, transcription or keying errors, between its initial collection and its use for Mineral Resource estimation purposes. Data validation procedures used.

• The Competent Persons have relied on the professional quality of the historical data compilation work, including reviews of this historical work. The Resource Estimate which form part of this report were based on the 2018 and 2019 drilling, as well as historical drilling, select trenching data, adit data, and mapping data. Dahrouge completed a 100% validation of the 2018-2019 work; a 100% validation of historic drillhole locations; and an approximate 75% spot check of coal seam intersections, creating an independent database. The data sets, including analytical data, are incomplete in some instances, and analytical certificates and details of QA/QC programs were not necessarily included in the historical summary reports. In 2018. Montem acquired additional data for 43 drillholes from the Alberta Energy Regulators (AER); this data was not included in previous Resource Estimates.

• Historical coal quality data was evaluated by both Dahrouge and A&B Mylec. A&B Mylec focused on the historical coal washability data and used the criteria outlined in Section 11 to select a total of 28 valid historical representative samples to include in the washability database



along with the 2018 and 2019 washability samples.

• Dahrouge compiled a raw ash database for creation of ash and relative density grids to be used within the geological model and resource estimation. A total of 29 historical coal quality samples were utilized in the ash and relative density grids, which were selected using the following criteria:

o The historical coal quality samples were depth corrected against geophysical logs

o The samples were required to have >80% sample/core recovery and <20% parting inclusion by length to be included in the gridding process

o Dahrouge incorporated the washability samples selected by A&B Mylec and the 2018/2019 coal quality data into the raw ash database

• Drillholes were qualified using a reliability indicator classification system, from 1-3. The reliability was based on the quantity and quality of data available and the known accuracy of each collar location (see Section 11). Results are summarized below:

RELIABILITY TOTAL DRILLHOLES (RC + DDH+

TRENCHES)

1 73

2 136

3 51

EXCLUDED 36

• Not all data addressed in the historical summary reports and technical reports could be located by Dahrouge, and therefore, could not be used in this report. The authors have reviewed the data for consistency between the different projects and companies and eliminated data that could not be constrained or confirmed in reports or government databases. The authors have concluded that work completed by the coal production and exploration companies was conducted in a professional manner that was consistent with the data collection and reporting standards at that time.

Site visits Comment on any site visits undertaken by the Competent Person and the outcome of those visits.

• Competent Person Mr. Bradley Ulry visited the site June 25th to 28th, July



If no site visits have been undertaken indicate why this is the case.

6th to 12th, 2019 and September 12th to 13th 2019.. Competent Person Mr. John Gorham visited the Property on December 5th and December 12th to 13th, 2018, and provided some management direction throughout the drill program between December 5th and 22nd, 2018. Mr. Matthew Carter did not visit the Property.

Geological

interpretation

Confidence in (or conversely, the uncertainty of) the geological interpretation of the mineral deposit. Nature of the data used and of any assumptions made. The effect, if any, of alternative interpretations on Mineral Resource estimation. The use of geology in guiding and controlling Mineral Resource estimation. The factors affecting continuity both of grade and geology.

• Details of the geological interpretation and its use in resource estimation are presented in section 14. The geological model was constructed using an implicit 3-D modelling software, Seequent - Leapfrog GeoTM. A vetted database was imported into Leapfrog TM, where it was validated, and any erroneous or conflicting data was amended. The geological model incorporated historic surface maps, cross-sections and mine plans; surface mapping datapoints; drilling and trenching datapoints and in-situ downhole Acoustic and Optical Televiewer measurements. The historic surface maps, cross-sections and mine plans were used to evaluate the geological structures and stratigraphic orientations (Figure 13-4; 13-5).

• SRK structural and resource geologists completed an independent review of both the stratigraphic and coal seam solids.

Dimensions The extent and variability of the Mineral Resource expressed as length (along strike or otherwise), plan width, and depth below surface to the upper and lower limits of the Mineral Resource.

• The Tent Mountain Project covers an irregular shaped area 9 km north to south and 2 km east to west. The strike trend of the Project is more or less north-south. Plan length and width of the resource are about 5000 m and 2000 m respectively (Figure 14-6) Resources are limited to Project boundaries; subcrop clipped against base of weathering (8 m); a minimum coal thickness of 0.6 m, a maximum depth of 500 m from topography, and a cumulative strip ratio of 20:1 bcm/t. This approach approximately reflects existing practical recovery limits for thin seam open cut mining.

Estimation and

modeling

techniques

The nature and appropriateness of the estimation technique(s) applied and key assumptions, including treatment of extreme grade values, domaining, interpolation parameters and maximum distance of extrapolation from data points. If a computer assisted estimation method was chosen include a description of computer software and parameters used. The availability of check estimates, previous estimates and/or mine production records and whether the Mineral Resource estimate takes appropriate account

• Details of the resource modelling and estimation techniques are presented in section 13. For the purpose of this Resource Estimate, the Tent Mountain Mine has been assigned as a complex geology type, due to the presence of regional and local faulting, folding and deformation seam thickening. Resource classifications were determined using an Inverse Distance Estimator (ID2). The base-of-weathering clipped resource classification grade shell (polygons) is illustrated in Figures 13-8 through 13-13, presenting the near surface distribution of Measured, Indicated and Inferred category resources.

• Historical density information for deposits on the Property was relatively



of such data. The assumptions made regarding recovery of by-products. Estimation of deleterious elements or other non-grade variables of economic significance (e.g. sulphur for acid mine drainage characterization). In the case of block model interpolation, the block size in relation to the average sample spacing and the search employed. Any assumptions behind modelling of selective mining units. Any assumptions about correlation between variables. Description of how the geological interpretation was used to control the resource estimates. Discussion of basis for using or not using grade cutting or capping. The process of validation, the checking process used, the comparison of model data to drill hole data, and use of reconciliation data if available.

sparse and all past Resource Estimations used a constant bulk density value that was assumed across the property. This value was determined from the coal rank and average ash contents as defined in GSC 88-21. Average dried ash content was determined to be 15-20 percent by weight, with a rank classification of medium volatile bituminous coal. This produced a bulk density of 1.45 g/cm3.

• The current Resource Estimate used a variable density derived from the laboratory reported relative densities. Air-dried ash, and air-dried relative density coal seam quality grid models were constructed in Maptek’s Vulcan 12 TM. Quality grids were checked to ensure that the interpolated values propagated to the full extent of the Leapfrog Geo TM geologic model. Coal quality grids were not created for two seam plies, S3L and S3U, due to the lack of representative coal quality data.

• Coal quality grids were used to add and populate block model variables for the Horizontal Adaptive Rectangular Prism (HARP) block model (Section 13.3.2 and 13.3.3) through the Integrated Stratigraphic Modelling (ISM) module in VulcanTM

• Statistical outputs of each coal quality variables for each seam ply are presented in Table 13-2 and Table 13-3, was performed using Vulcan Data AnalyzerTM. The DatamineTM classic block model block statistics closely matched the Vulcan statistics.

• Maptek VulcanTM 12 was utilized to generate the block model for the Tent Mountain project area. The modelling database, topography, seam and structural models from the Leapfrog Geo TM Tent Mountain geologic model were imported into Vulcan TM. Imported data was evaluated to confirm the correct model extents, coordinate system, location of drill collars, and coal seam intersections relative to seam solid and structural models. Additionally, any imported triangulated solids were validated to ensure conservation of original volumes, closure of the solids, consistency of the solids, and no crossing or self-intersections. The LeapfrogTM seam models for each ply were converted into VulcanTM seam roof and seam floor surfaces. Each resultant VulcanTM roof and floor surface was evaluated to ensure no crossing or self-intersections had been created during the conversion process. Seam roof and floor surfaces were overlaid and visually compared to their original parent LeapfrogTM solids to confirm surface geometries and extents were honoured (see Section



13-3-3 for details).

• The summarized modelling methodology used for the Resource estimation for all areas of the Property consisted of the following steps:

• Import validated LeapfrogTM modelling database, topography, seam solid triangulations, and structural model into Maptek Vulcan 12TM

• Verify correct coordinate system (UTM NAD83 Zone 11N) and model extents for imported data

• Validate seam solid triangulations, testing for conservation of volume, consistency, closure, and crossing/self-intersection

• Validate structural fault blocks, testing for conservation of volume, consistency, closure, and crossing/self-intersection.

• Validate structural fault surfaces by applying a Boolean test against the corresponding fault block

• Visually confirm placement of drill collars relative to topography and assigned model coordinates

• Visually confirm drill intersections correspond to seam solid and structural models

• Build the VulcanTM Horizon List (gdc_glob)

• Convert LeapfrogTM seam solid triangulations into VulcanTM seam roof and floor surfaces

• Validate VulcanTM seam roof and seam floor surfaces by visual comparison to the original LeapfrogTM seam solid triangulations

• Create a HARP (Horizontal Adaptive Rectangular Prism) block model. Blocks were 10 m x 10 m with a 5 m x 5 m sub-blocking (x and y directions)

• Validate HARP generated seam volumes against original LeapfrogTM seam solid triangulation volumes

• Superimpose and visually verify HARP generated seam solid triangulations honour original LeapfrogTM seam solid triangulations

• Determine the cumulative stripping ratio for each block of coal within the model (total volume of waste/total tonnage of product)

• Generate VulcanTM grade shells for each resource classification – Measured, Indicated, and Inferred from the LeapfrogTM ID2 generated Resource classification

• Apply a maximum Resource depth cut-off of 500 m’s from topography



accommodating for the steep topographic terrain.

• HARP Cells were populated for Resource classification grade shells, Ash (ad) quality grids and Relative Density (ad) quality grids.

• Constrain resource estimation by Montem Coal Leases and Freehold Tenement boundaries

• Constrain resource estimation to a seam aggregate thickness greater than 0.6 m with a maximum internal ply interburden < 0.45 m.

• For the purpose of this Resource Estiamte, a surface minable resource was used. Surface resources are those resources with a cumulative stripping ratio of less than 20:1 (cubic metres of waste to a tonne of coal), an aggregate seam thickness greater than 0.6 m, and a vertical depth from topography less than 500 m. A more conservative minimum seam thickness cut-off of 0.6 m instead of 0.3 m is in common use for coals of the western Canadian Cordillera due to the greater structural complexity. The remaining coal resources at Tent Mountain have open cut potential. The steep mountainous terrain at the Tent Mountain Mine limits the deepest portions of the resource to areas immediately below the more elevated portions of the Project such as peaks and topographic highs. Overall, more than 80% of the resource occurs at depths of less than 300 m total depth with the shallower portions of the deposit occurring in the more aerially extensive hillside flanks and valleys. The deposit geometry makes the resource potentially suitable for a Mountain Top Removal (MTM) mining approach which justifies the application of a 500 m depth cut-off for open cut resources. The in-place resources for the Tent Mountain Project areas are summarized in Table 13-5 and detailed by seam in Table 13-6 and in Figures 13-7 to 13-11.

Moisture Whether the tonnages are estimated on a dry basis or with natural moisture, and the method of determination of the moisture content.

• The current Resource Estimate used a variable density derived from the laboratory reported relative densities. Air-dried ash, and air-dried relative density coal seam quality grid models were constructed in Maptek’s Vulcan 12 TM . Estimated in-situ moisture was calculated using the average air-dried moisture of 2019 coal quality sampling + 4% (total 5.3%).

Cut-off

parameters

The basis of the adopted cut-off grade(s) or quality

parameters applied.

• Resources are limited to coal tenement boundaries; subcrop against base of weathering; a minimum coal thickness of 0.6 m, a maximum internal ply interburden < 0.45 m, a maximum depth of 500m and a cumulative strip ratio of 20:1bcm/t. This approach approximately reflects existing



practical recovery limits for thin seam open cut mining.

Mining factors

or

assumptions

Assumptions made regarding possible mining methods, minimum mining dimensions and internal (or, if applicable, external) mining dilution. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider potential mining methods, but the assumptions made regarding mining methods and parameters when estimating Mineral Resources may not always be rigorous. Where this is the case, this should be reported with an explanation of the basis of the mining assumptions made.

• For the purpose of this Resource Estimate, a surface minable method of extraction is assumed. Surface resources are those resources with a cumulative stripping ratio of less than 20:1 (cubic metres of waste to a tonne of coal), an aggregate seam thickness greater than 0.6 m, and a vertical depth from topography of less than 500 m. The steep mountainous terrain at the Tent Mountain Mine limits the deepest portions of the resource to areas immediately below the more elevated portions of the Project such as peaks and topographic highs. Overall, more than 80% of the resource occurs at depths of less than 300 m total depth with the shallower portions of the deposit occurring in the more aerially extensive hillside flanks and valleys. The deposit geometry makes the resource potentially suitable for a Mountain Top Removal (MTM) mining approach which justifies the application of a 500 m depth cut-off for open cut resources. A definitive evaluation of the mining methods has not been completed and included in this report. Most of the historical production on the Property has been through surface mining.

• Consideration of reasonable prospects for production include favourable geology (other nearby producers of coking coal from the same formation and seams, nearby infrastructure (road, rail and power) abundant available water, a nearby labour pool (4 operating surface coking coal mines), favourable land-use categories, and a favourable government and social attitude to resource extraction.

Metallurgical

factors or

assumptions

The basis for assumptions or predictions regarding metallurgical amenability. It is always necessary as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider potential metallurgical methods, but the assumptions regarding metallurgical treatment processes and parameters made when reporting Mineral Resources may not always be rigorous. Where this is the case, this should be reported with an explanation of the basis of the metallurgical assumptions made.

• Coal quality from historical data was compiled by Dahrouge and expanded on by A&B Mylec. This included a validated database from hardcopy laboratory and exploration reports, including drillhole, trench, bulk and wash plant samples. This data was obtained from historical records, collected in the 1970’s. Coal quality data from 2018/2019 LDC drilling has been incorporated into this database. Details of historical sample selection are detailed in Section 11.

• There is no known material data which would place at risk the assumption that the coal can be mined cleanly and/or blended and/or washed to a saleable specification

Environmental Assumptions made regarding possible waste and process residue disposal options. It is always necessary

• Various environmental baseline and impact studies are currently underway at Tent Mountain as part of on-going studies of which this



factors or

assumptions

as part of the process of determining reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction to consider the potential environmental impacts of the mining and processing operation. While at this stage the determination of potential environmental impacts, particularly for a greenfields project, may not always be well advanced, the status of early consideration of these potential environmental impacts should be reported. Where these aspects have not been considered this should be reported with an explanation of the environmental assumptions made.

resource estimation forms a part. These will address acid/base balance, surface and groundwater quality and flow, soil and vegetation surveys and monitoring, wildlife habitat and movement.

• Section 4.8 and 4.9 detail environmental liabilities and other significant factors and risks

o A small area, 4.6 ha, of one Alberta Freehold Tenement (all minerals except gold and silver) falls within the southwest limits of the South Saskatchewan Regional Plan (SSRP). The SSRP, applies to both private and crown lands and ensures Montem’s stewardship to the environment as well as adding limits to water use licensing.

o The entire Alberta portion of the project is located within a Mountain Goat and Bighorn Sheep Range. In these areas, efforts will be required to be made to avoid disturbances that may have a direct or indirect adverse effect and to avoid permanent alteration of habitat. The entire Tent Mountain Project is located within a Grizzly Bear Protection zone which is declared to provide and preserve either core or secondary grizzly bear habitat.

o The Alberta Coal Leases fall within the Rocky Mountain Forest Reserve. This reserve is managed by the province primarily for resource development management and recreational use purposes, although the designation of wilderness areas has been used to restrict certain types of access for management of habitat and conservation purposes.

o The Mist Mountain Formation, the targeted coal-bearing unit, is naturally enriched in selenium. In alkaline, aerobic conditions, elemental selenium and selenide minerals are oxidized releasing soluble selenate ions which can be transported in surface runoff. Large scale surface mining in the Elk Valley, British Columbia has enriched the Elk River in selenium. Any future mine development on the Property will require the development of a selenium management plan.

Bulk density Whether assumed or determined. If assumed, the basis for the assumptions. If determined, the method used, whether wet or dry, the frequency of the

• Historical density information on the Property was relatively sparse and all past Resource Estimations used a constant bulk density value that was assumed across the Project. This value was determined from the



measurements, the nature, size and representativeness of the samples. The bulk density for bulk material must have been measured by methods that adequately account for void spaces (vugs, porosity, etc), moisture and differences between rock and alteration zones within the deposit. Discuss assumptions for bulk density estimates used in the evaluation process of the different materials.

coal rank and average ash contents as defined in GSC 88-21. Average dried ash content was determined to be 15-20 percent by weight, with a rank classification of medium volatile bituminous coal. This produced a bulk density of 1.45 g/cm3.

• The current Resource Estimate uses grid modelled densities for each seam ply (Section 13-3-2). The 2018 and 2019 relative density, ash and inherent moisture measurements were used in combination with A&B Mylec selected historical samples and additional coal quality data with greater than 80% recovery and less than 20% parting inclusion to generate individual seam ply grids. The criteria for historical sample selection is outlined in Section 11. A 5% in-situ moisture was applied for a relative density correction to estimate in-situ density.

o In-situ relative density correction: [RDad x (100 - Mad)] / [100 + RDad x (ISM – Mad) – ISM]

Classification The basis for the classification of the Mineral Resources into varying confidence categories. Whether appropriate account has been taken of all relevant factors (i.e. relative confidence in tonnage/grade estimations, reliability of input data, confidence in continuity of geology and metal values, quality, quantity and distribution of the data). Whether the result appropriately reflects the Competent Person’s view of the deposit.

• As the stratigraphic and structural complexity of a coal deposit increases, a greater number of data points are required to assign the coal to measured, indicated, or inferred resource categories. Data points were defined as locations where a coal seam, or a marker horizon indicating the proximity to a coal seam, is exposed. Valid data points were obtained from drillhole intersections and surface measured sections. Seam thickness and reliability were assigned to all datapoints used in the Resource.

• For the purpose of this Resource Estimate, the Tent Mountain Mine has been assigned as a complex geology type, due to the presence of regional and local faulting, folding and deformation seam thickening. Resource classifications were determined using an Inverse Distance Estimator (ID2) with the criteria provided in Section 13-3-1 (see Tables 13-5 through 13-10 and Figures 13-8 through 13-13). Resource classification required three coal seam intersections within the defined ellipsoid search radii to be included in the Resource. This defined a search plain and limited search extension from control points to multiple confirm coal seam markers.

• Geostatistical and structural analysis were conducted in tandem with resource modelling and supports the classification.

Audits or The results of any audits or reviews of Mineral Resource • This study and Resource Estimate was independently reviewed by Tamplin Resources Pty. Ltd. Recommendations were reviewed and



reviews estimates. incorporated into reporting. Resource Estimates presented in this study were internally reviewed by senior qualified peers from SRK Consulting Ltd., having no direct involvement in the derivation of the Resource Estimate.

Discussion of

relative

accuracy/

confidence

Where appropriate a statement of the relative accuracy and confidence level in the Mineral Resource estimate using an approach or procedure deemed appropriate by the Competent Person. For example, the application of statistical or geostatistical procedures to quantify the relative accuracy of the resource within stated confidence limits, or, if such an approach is not deemed appropriate, a qualitative discussion of the factors that could affect the relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate. The statement should specify whether it relates to global or local estimates, and, if local, state the relevant tonnages, which should be relevant to technical and economic evaluation. Documentation should include assumptions made and the procedures used. These statements of relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate should be compared with production data, where available.

• Structurally, the Tent Mountain deposit is reasonably well understood. The current interpretation has not materially changed since the 1970’s. Multiple workers have reviewed the interpretation in the ensuing period and the Competent Persons regard it as valid. The main factors affecting coal seam continuity are the interplay of faulting, folding, seam dip, depth of weathering and surface topography. Seams show a highly variable thickness which reflects depositional and structural variations as well as the localized thickening of coal seams which occur in the apex of folds and adjacent to reverse faults. These provided substantial tonnage benefits during past mining.

• Coal recovery in cored holes was poor to good, ranging from a low of 36% to a high of 100% for the identified seam groups with an average coal recovery of approximately 73%. This is due to the extremely friable nature of the coal and considerable internal micro faulting within the seams. This behaviour and slim core coal recovery is typical of coals in this area. For the 2018/2019 drilling campaigns, the average recovery was 87%. Better success in recovery was due to increased core diameter and the use of split tube techniques

• All remaining coal resources on the Tent Mountain Mine have open cut potential. Resources have a moderate level of confidence. Drillholes are spaced closely enough for coal seam continuity and quality to be assumed justifying some Measured, as well as Indicated status and Inferred Status within the declaration areas. The extent of coal washouts and faulting may negatively affect the coal resource tonnage for each affected coal seam. Significant faulting and folding is likely to exist throughout the deposit.


APPENDIX 1

Table 9-10, Table 11-2, Table 11-3 and Table 12-1


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD74-17 292.16 292.90 0.74 S7

TD74-17 292.90 294.46 1.56 S7

TD74-17 294.46 295.22 0.76 S7

TD74-17 296.16 296.68 0.52 S7

TD74-24 163.81 164.79 0.98 S7

TD74-25 101.70 101.75 0.05 S7

TD74-26 104.08 104.70 0.62 S7

TD74-27 22.40 23.76 1.36 S7

TD74-6 7.74 8.40 0.66 S7

TD74-6 8.40 9.30 0.90 S7

TD74-7 10.70 11.32 0.62 S7

TD74-8 19.57 20.57 1.00 S7

TD75-34 207.74 212.73 4.99 S7

TD75-34 212.73 213.10 0.37 S7

TD75-35 258.57 258.91 0.34 S7

TD75-40 2.69 14.09 11.40 S7

TD75-40 14.09 14.61 0.52 S7

TD75-40 14.61 15.93 1.32 S7

TD75-40 15.93 21.55 5.62 S7

TD75-43 16.75 17.27 0.52 S7

TD75-43 17.27 18.29 1.02 S7

TD75-43 18.29 19.15 0.86 S7

TD76-85 44.46 45.12 0.66 S7

TD76-91 120.23 120.79 0.56 S7

TD76-99 354.32 354.50 0.18 S7

TD76-99 354.50 357.08 2.58 S7

TD76-99 357.08 357.36 0.28 S7

TM19-027 60.00 60.70 0.70 S7

TM19-027 61.20 61.70 0.50 S7

TM19-027LDC 65.64 65.89 0.25 S7

TM19-027LDC 65.89 65.97 0.08 S7

TM19-027LDC 65.97 66.15 0.18 S7

TM19-027LDC 66.15 66.37 0.22 S7

TM19-027LDC 66.37 66.88 0.51 S7

TM19-027LDC 66.88 67.37 0.49 S7

TM19-027LDC 67.37 67.42 0.05 S7

TM19-027LDC 67.42 67.77 0.35 S7

TM19-027LDC 67.77 67.92 0.15 S7

TM19-027LDC 67.92 68.23 0.31 S7

TM19-027LDCB 62.00 62.60 0.60 S7

TM19-027LDCB 62.60 63.40 0.80 S7

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-027LDCB 63.40 64.20 0.80 S7

TM19-027LDCB 64.20 64.60 0.40 S7

TM19-027LDCB 64.60 65.00 0.40 S7

TM19-058 33.38 34.20 0.82 S7

TR-TM19-001 0.38 0.68 0.30 S7

TR-TM19-001 1.04 1.35 0.31 S7

TD73-1 332.84 334.37 1.52 S6U

TD73-2 230.30 231.74 1.44 S6U

TD74-16 15.20 20.52 5.32 S6U

TD74-17 367.28 372.40 5.12 S6U

TD74-18 37.25 38.89 1.64 S6U

TD74-19 24.80 25.88 1.08 S6U

TD74-20 20.98 23.62 2.64 S6U

TD74-21 132.52 133.02 0.50 S6U

TD74-21 133.02 133.40 0.38 S6U

TD74-21 133.40 135.66 2.26 S6U

TD74-21 135.66 137.04 1.38 S6U

TD74-22 15.70 15.85 0.15 S6U

TD74-23 125.66 126.78 1.12 S6U

TD74-24 225.35 227.53 2.18 S6U

TD74-24 227.53 228.69 1.16 S6U

TD74-24 228.69 229.49 0.80 S6U

TD74-24 229.49 232.37 2.88 S6U

TD74-24 232.37 232.93 0.56 S6U

TD74-24 232.93 233.63 0.70 S6U

TD74-24 233.63 234.35 0.72 S6U

TD74-25 176.56 177.56 1.00 S6U

TD74-26 161.10 161.90 0.80 S6U

TD74-27 153.94 155.02 1.08 S6U

TD74-27 155.82 157.70 1.88 S6U

TD74-6 49.08 49.70 0.62 S6U

TD74-7 70.66 71.70 1.04 S6U

TD74-7 71.70 72.70 1.00 S6U

TD74-7 72.70 73.50 0.80 S6U

TD74-8 82.41 83.35 0.94 S6U

TD74-8 83.35 84.61 1.26 S6U

TD74-8 84.61 86.45 1.84 S6U

TD74-9 12.15 12.55 0.40 S6U

TD75-34 316.96 317.34 0.38 S6U

TD75-35 312.12 312.43 0.31 S6U

TD75-35 313.37 313.89 0.52 S6U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD75-36 473.54 474.27 0.73 S6U

TD75-36 474.27 474.88 0.61 S6U

TD75-36 474.88 475.79 0.91 S6U

TD75-40 49.63 60.89 11.26 S6U

TD75-43 56.81 58.73 1.92 S6U

TD75-49 151.74 152.34 0.60 S6U

TD76-100 78.29 78.79 0.50 S6U

TD76-101 86.00 86.90 0.90 S6U

TD76-105 351.21 353.65 2.44 S6U

TD76-85 65.10 66.12 1.02 S6U

TD76-86 33.80 34.08 0.28 S6U

TD76-86 34.08 35.16 1.08 S6U

TD76-87 51.80 53.96 2.16 S6U

TD76-90 123.00 123.32 0.32 S6U

TD76-90 123.32 123.66 0.34 S6U

TD76-90 123.66 124.08 0.42 S6U

TD76-90 124.08 125.50 1.42 S6U

TD76-90 125.50 125.86 0.36 S6U

TD76-90 125.86 126.50 0.64 S6U

TD76-91 164.81 166.35 1.54 S6U

TD76-91 166.35 167.53 1.18 S6U

TD76-91 167.53 168.85 1.32 S6U

TD76-97 87.79 90.09 2.30 S6U

TD76-97 90.09 92.81 2.72 S6U

TD76-97 92.81 93.37 0.56 S6U

TD76-99 418.04 419.02 0.98 S6U

TM18-005 14.80 16.50 1.70 S6U

TM19-022 1.50 3.00 1.50 S6U

TM19-023 7.60 8.30 0.70 S6U

TM19-027 84.80 89.00 4.20 S6U

TM19-027LDC 88.12 88.70 0.58 S6U

TM19-027LDC 88.70 88.77 0.07 S6U

TM19-027LDC 88.77 89.22 0.45 S6U

TM19-027LDC 89.22 89.27 0.05 S6U

TM19-027LDC 89.27 90.43 1.16 S6U

TM19-027LDC 90.43 90.75 0.32 S6U

TM19-027LDC 90.75 90.80 0.05 S6U

TM19-027LDC 90.80 91.77 0.97 S6U

TM19-027LDC 91.77 91.82 0.05 S6U

TM19-027LDC 91.82 92.19 0.37 S6U

TM19-027LDC 92.19 92.49 0.30 S6U


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-027LDC 92.49 92.62 0.13 S6U

TM19-027LDC 92.62 92.90 0.28 S6U

TM19-027LDC 92.90 93.02 0.12 S6U

TM19-027LDC 93.02 93.35 0.33 S6U

TM19-027LDC 93.35 93.52 0.17 S6U

TM19-027LDC 93.52 94.14 0.62 S6U

TM19-027LDC 94.14 94.17 0.03 S6U

TM19-027LDC 94.17 94.39 0.22 S6U

TM19-027LDC 94.39 94.89 0.50 S6U

TM19-027LDC 94.89 94.94 0.05 S6U

TM19-027LDC 94.94 95.12 0.18 S6U

TM19-027LDCB 88.22 88.52 0.30 S6U

TM19-027LDCB 88.52 88.85 0.33 S6U

TM19-027LDCB 88.85 88.92 0.07 S6U

TM19-027LDCB 88.92 89.00 0.08 S6U

TM19-027LDCB 89.00 89.23 0.23 S6U

TM19-027LDCB 89.23 89.96 0.73 S6U

TM19-027LDCB 89.96 90.10 0.14 S6U

TM19-027LDCB 90.10 90.80 0.70 S6U

TM19-027LDCB 90.80 90.85 0.05 S6U

TM19-027LDCB 90.85 91.19 0.34 S6U

TM19-027LDCB 91.19 91.44 0.25 S6U

TM19-027LDCB 91.44 91.60 0.16 S6U

TM19-027LDCB 91.60 91.75 0.15 S6U

TM19-039 65.30 65.80 0.50 S6U

TM19-039 66.10 67.20 1.10 S6U

TM19-041 51.70 52.30 0.60 S6U

TM19-041 52.70 54.00 1.30 S6U

TM19-042 42.40 42.90 0.50 S6U

TM19-042 43.40 44.50 1.10 S6U

TM19-045 24.60 28.20 3.60 S6U

TM19-045LDC 26.50 28.16 1.66 S6U

TM19-045LDC 28.16 28.26 0.10 S6U

TM19-045LDC 28.26 28.52 0.26 S6U

TM19-045LDC 28.52 28.61 0.09 S6U

TM19-045LDC 28.61 28.83 0.22 S6U

TM19-045LDC 28.83 29.03 0.20 S6U

TM19-045LDC 29.03 29.17 0.14 S6U

TM19-045LDC 29.17 29.61 0.44 S6U

TM19-045LDC 29.61 30.09 0.48 S6U

TM19-045LDC 30.09 30.11 0.02 S6U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-045LDC 30.11 31.21 1.10 S6U

TM19-045LDC 31.70 32.34 0.64 S6U

TM19-045LDC 32.34 32.42 0.08 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 22.62 22.96 0.34 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 22.96 23.40 0.44 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 23.40 23.69 0.29 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 23.69 24.06 0.37 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 24.06 24.84 0.78 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 24.84 24.92 0.08 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 24.92 25.01 0.09 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 25.01 25.42 0.41 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 25.42 25.50 0.08 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 25.50 25.59 0.09 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 25.59 25.61 0.02 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 25.61 25.66 0.05 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 25.66 25.71 0.05 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 25.71 26.32 0.61 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 26.32 26.36 0.04 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 26.36 26.54 0.18 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 26.54 26.62 0.08 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 26.62 26.72 0.10 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 26.72 27.52 0.80 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 27.52 27.92 0.40 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 27.92 29.12 1.20 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 29.12 29.48 0.36 S6U

TM19-045LDCB 29.48 29.58 0.10 S6U

TM19-052 94.00 105.00 11.00 S6U

TM19-052LDC 94.10 94.17 0.07 S6U

TM19-052LDC 94.17 94.25 0.08 S6U

TM19-052LDC 94.25 94.28 0.03 S6U

TM19-052LDC 94.28 94.88 0.60 S6U

TM19-052LDC 94.88 95.09 0.21 S6U

TM19-052LDC 95.09 95.42 0.33 S6U

TM19-052LDC 95.42 95.47 0.05 S6U

TM19-052LDC 95.47 96.14 0.67 S6U

TM19-052LDC 96.14 96.30 0.16 S6U

TM19-052LDC 96.30 96.56 0.26 S6U

TM19-055 155.35 156.30 0.95 S6U

TM19-058 59.74 60.06 0.32 S6U

TR-TM19-002 0.40 8.80 8.40 S6U

TR-TM19-006 0.20 1.50 1.30 S6U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD74-16 32.82 33.38 0.56 S6M

TD74-17 373.68 374.66 0.98 S6M

TD74-17 375.28 375.70 0.42 S6M

TD74-18 39.55 40.99 1.44 S6M

TD74-19 25.88 29.12 3.24 S6M

TD74-20 24.88 25.88 1.00 S6M

TD74-21 137.32 144.70 7.38 S6M

TD74-21 144.70 145.04 0.34 S6M

TD74-21 145.04 146.78 1.74 S6M

TD74-21 147.10 147.42 0.32 S6M

TD74-22 16.60 17.20 0.60 S6M

TD74-23 131.90 132.80 0.90 S6M

TD74-24 235.95 236.65 0.70 S6M

TD74-24 236.65 237.03 0.38 S6M

TD74-24 237.03 238.01 0.98 S6M

TD74-25 178.22 184.90 6.68 S6M

TD74-25 184.90 185.92 1.02 S6M

TD74-25 185.92 189.04 3.12 S6M

TD74-25 189.04 189.92 0.88 S6M

TD74-26 163.72 164.52 0.80 S6M

TD74-26 164.52 166.50 1.98 S6M

TD74-26 168.00 172.52 4.52 S6M

TD74-27 159.54 160.16 0.62 S6M

TD74-27 160.16 162.92 2.76 S6M

TD74-27 162.92 163.64 0.72 S6M

TD74-27 163.64 168.42 4.78 S6M

TD74-6 50.68 51.72 1.04 S6M

TD74-7 82.24 83.32 1.08 S6M

TD74-8 98.99 99.65 0.66 S6M

TD74-9 17.89 19.11 1.22 S6M

TD75-35 317.17 317.65 0.48 S6M

TD75-35 317.65 318.11 0.46 S6M

TD75-35 318.11 318.30 0.19 S6M

TD75-35 318.30 318.80 0.50 S6M

TD75-35 318.80 319.01 0.21 S6M

TD75-35 319.01 319.85 0.84 S6M

TD75-35 319.85 320.43 0.58 S6M

TD75-35 320.43 321.59 1.16 S6M

TD75-36 476.49 477.32 0.82 S6M

TD75-40 63.69 65.53 1.84 S6M

TD75-40 65.53 66.55 1.02 S6M


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD75-40 66.55 68.95 2.40 S6M

TD75-40 69.55 70.39 0.84 S6M

TD75-43 60.05 60.39 0.34 S6M

TD75-43 60.39 69.27 8.88 S6M

TD76-100 78.79 80.27 1.48 S6M

TD76-101 89.50 90.00 0.50 S6M

TD76-101 90.00 90.38 0.38 S6M

TD76-101 90.38 91.18 0.80 S6M

TD76-101 91.18 91.82 0.64 S6M

TD76-101 91.82 92.70 0.88 S6M

TD76-101 92.70 93.74 1.04 S6M

TD76-101 93.74 95.04 1.30 S6M

TD76-85 66.12 68.28 2.16 S6M

TD76-86 38.04 39.16 1.12 S6M

TD76-86 39.72 40.34 0.62 S6M

TD76-87 53.96 54.76 0.80 S6M

TD76-90 126.50 128.12 1.62 S6M

TD76-90 128.12 128.68 0.56 S6M

TD76-90 128.68 129.04 0.36 S6M

TD76-91 169.75 173.23 3.48 S6M

TD76-97 95.63 96.71 1.08 S6M

TD76-99 419.68 422.50 2.82 S6M

TM18-005 21.10 21.50 0.40 S6M

TM19-022 12.10 12.90 0.80 S6M

TM19-027 90.00 91.50 1.50 S6M

TM19-027LDC 95.24 95.69 0.45 S6M

TM19-027LDCB 92.10 92.62 0.52 S6M

TM19-027LDCB 92.62 92.70 0.08 S6M

TM19-039 68.20 74.20 6.00 S6M

TM19-041 54.90 56.60 1.70 S6M

TM19-041 56.90 60.40 3.50 S6M

TM19-042 46.30 48.30 2.00 S6M

TM19-045 29.20 30.10 0.90 S6M

TM19-045LDC 33.81 34.02 0.21 S6M

TM19-045LDC 34.02 34.28 0.26 S6M

TM19-045LDC 34.28 34.64 0.36 S6M

TM19-045LDC 34.64 34.81 0.17 S6M

TM19-045LDCB 30.15 30.43 0.28 S6M

TM19-045LDCB 30.43 30.58 0.15 S6M

TM19-045LDCB 30.58 30.91 0.33 S6M

TM19-045LDCB 30.91 31.00 0.09 S6M

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-045LDCB 31.00 31.13 0.13 S6M

TM19-045LDCB 31.13 31.37 0.24 S6M

TM19-052 110.00 112.00 2.00 S6M

TM19-052LDC 99.59 100.02 0.43 S6M

TM19-052LDC 100.02 100.15 0.13 S6M

TM19-052LDC 100.15 100.42 0.27 S6M

TM19-052LDC 100.42 100.49 0.07 S6M

TM19-052LDC 100.49 100.77 0.28 S6M

TM19-052LDC 100.77 100.83 0.06 S6M

TM19-052LDC 100.83 101.22 0.39 S6M

TM19-052LDC 101.22 101.62 0.40 S6M

TM19-052LDC 101.62 101.63 0.01 S6M

TM19-052LDC 101.63 102.04 0.41 S6M

TM19-052LDC 102.04 102.53 0.49 S6M

TM19-052LDC 102.53 103.08 0.55 S6M

TM19-052LDC 103.08 103.29 0.21 S6M

TM19-052LDC 103.29 104.00 0.71 S6M

TM19-052LDC 104.00 104.61 0.61 S6M

TM19-052LDC 104.61 104.78 0.17 S6M

TM19-052LDC 104.78 104.97 0.19 S6M

TM19-052LDC 104.97 105.43 0.46 S6M

TM19-052LDC 105.43 105.58 0.15 S6M

TM19-055 157.50 159.40 1.90 S6M

TM19-055 159.50 160.50 1.00 S6M

TM19-058 63.97 64.55 0.58 S6M

TR-TM19-003 0.28 2.14 1.86 S6M

TD73-1 339.70 340.31 0.61 S6L

TD74-16 38.42 38.94 0.52 S6L

TD74-16 38.94 39.36 0.42 S6L

TD74-16 39.36 39.94 0.58 S6L

TD74-17 376.50 377.20 0.70 S6L

TD74-18 40.99 41.61 0.62 S6L

TD74-21 150.90 151.88 0.98 S6L

TD74-24 240.85 241.65 0.80 S6L

TD74-24 241.65 242.63 0.98 S6L

TD74-25 217.62 219.04 1.42 S6L

TD74-25 219.04 220.96 1.92 S6L

TD74-26 172.70 173.00 0.30 S6L

TD74-26 174.50 175.16 0.66 S6L

TD74-26 175.16 176.14 0.98 S6L

TD74-27 172.00 174.22 2.22 S6L

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD74-6 66.72 68.04 1.32 S6L

TD74-6 68.60 69.30 0.70 S6L

TD74-7 85.96 86.76 0.80 S6L

TD74-7 86.76 87.64 0.88 S6L

TD74-8 104.69 105.39 0.70 S6L

TD74-8 105.39 106.93 1.54 S6L

TD74-8 106.93 107.37 0.44 S6L

TD74-9 21.03 21.75 0.72 S6L

TD75-35 322.77 323.05 0.28 S6L

TD75-35 323.85 325.31 1.46 S6L

TD75-40 127.55 128.63 1.08 S6L

TD75-40 130.13 130.57 0.44 S6L

TD75-40 130.57 132.63 2.06 S6L

TD75-40 132.63 140.49 7.86 S6L

TD75-40 140.49 140.91 0.42 S6L

TD75-40 140.91 142.23 1.32 S6L

TD75-40 142.23 144.91 2.68 S6L

TD75-43 69.27 70.39 1.12 S6L

TD75-43 70.39 72.05 1.66 S6L

TD76-100 80.27 80.61 0.34 S6L

TD76-101 100.32 100.82 0.50 S6L

TD76-101 100.82 101.12 0.30 S6L

TD76-101 101.12 101.94 0.82 S6L

TD76-85 68.28 70.22 1.94 S6L

TD76-86 40.34 43.50 3.16 S6L

TD76-86 43.50 44.00 0.50 S6L

TD76-86 44.62 45.46 0.84 S6L

TD76-87 54.76 57.02 2.26 S6L

TD76-90 130.58 130.98 0.40 S6L

TD76-91 175.35 175.71 0.36 S6L

TD76-91 176.33 176.89 0.56 S6L

TD76-91 176.89 177.55 0.66 S6L

TM19-027 93.80 94.10 0.30 S6L

TM19-027LDC 96.73 97.02 0.29 S6L

TM19-027LDC 97.02 97.11 0.09 S6L

TM19-027LDC 97.11 97.34 0.23 S6L

TM19-027LDCB 93.65 93.94 0.29 S6L

TM19-027LDCB 93.94 93.99 0.05 S6L

TM19-027LDCB 93.99 94.58 0.59 S6L

TM19-027LDCB 94.58 94.68 0.10 S6L

TM19-027LDCB 94.68 95.69 1.01 S6L


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-039 75.60 75.80 0.20 S6L

TM19-039 76.20 77.20 1.00 S6L

TM19-041 62.40 62.60 0.20 S6L

TM19-041 62.80 63.90 1.10 S6L

TM19-042 50.70 52.60 1.90 S6L

TM19-045 31.90 33.30 1.40 S6L

TM19-045LDC 34.85 35.32 0.47 S6L

TM19-045LDC 35.32 35.57 0.25 S6L

TM19-045LDC 35.57 35.92 0.35 S6L

TM19-045LDC 35.92 36.05 0.13 S6L

TM19-045LDCB 33.01 33.24 0.23 S6L

TM19-045LDCB 33.24 33.36 0.12 S6L

TM19-045LDCB 33.36 33.50 0.14 S6L

TM19-045LDCB 33.50 33.65 0.15 S6L

TM19-045LDCB 33.65 33.85 0.20 S6L

TM19-052LDC 108.62 110.11 1.49 S6L

TM19-052LDC 110.11 111.37 1.26 S6L

TM19-055 189.20 191.20 2.00 S6L

TM19-055 191.20 192.00 0.80 S6L

TM19-055 192.00 193.40 1.40 S6L

TM19-058 70.64 71.46 0.82 S6L

T75-16 15.33 15.99 0.66 S5U

T75-22 3.41 4.49 1.08 S5U

T75-22 4.49 5.71 1.22 S5U

T75-23 6.16 8.26 2.10 S5U

T75-23 8.26 9.40 1.14 S5U

T75-24 10.71 11.65 0.94 S5U

T75-25 1.51 3.47 1.96 S5U

T75-25 3.47 3.95 0.48 S5U

T75-26 5.60 6.44 0.84 S5U

T75-26 6.44 7.70 1.26 S5U

T75-26 7.70 8.42 0.72 S5U

T75-26 8.42 9.44 1.02 S5U

T75-27 5.70 8.00 2.30 S5U

T75-28 7.98 9.30 1.32 S5U

T75-28 9.30 9.66 0.36 S5U

T75-28 10.76 11.88 1.12 S5U

T75-28 11.88 12.40 0.52 S5U

T75-29 9.53 10.77 1.24 S5U

T75-29 10.77 11.53 0.76 S5U

T75-29 11.53 12.43 0.90 S5U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

T75-30 8.71 10.39 1.68 S5U

T75-30 10.39 11.09 0.70 S5U

T75-34 10.35 11.37 1.02 S5U

TD73-1 434.34 436.47 2.13 S5U

TD74-10 99.21 99.57 0.36 S5U

TD74-16 82.52 83.26 0.74 S5U

TD74-17 483.44 484.34 0.90 S5U

TD74-17 484.34 485.18 0.84 S5U

TD74-17 485.18 487.08 1.90 S5U

TD74-17 487.08 488.02 0.94 S5U

TD74-18 97.71 101.19 3.48 S5U

TD74-18 101.19 102.99 1.80 S5U

TD74-19 90.02 92.94 2.92 S5U

TD74-20 97.70 99.62 1.92 S5U

TD74-20 99.62 100.24 0.62 S5U

TD74-21 200.06 200.52 0.46 S5U

TD74-21 200.52 201.00 0.48 S5U

TD74-21 201.00 201.60 0.60 S5U

TD74-21 201.60 204.52 2.92 S5U

TD74-21 206.04 207.26 1.22 S5U

TD74-22 56.70 58.58 1.88 S5U

TD74-23 181.36 183.14 1.78 S5U

TD74-23 183.14 183.56 0.42 S5U

TD74-23 184.94 185.78 0.84 S5U

TD74-24 329.43 330.75 1.32 S5U

TD74-24 330.75 331.49 0.74 S5U

TD74-24 331.49 333.29 1.80 S5U

TD74-24 333.29 333.71 0.42 S5U

TD74-24 335.11 336.11 1.00 S5U

TD74-25 286.68 288.14 1.46 S5U

TD74-25 288.14 288.70 0.56 S5U

TD74-25 290.82 293.44 2.62 S5U

TD74-25 293.44 294.38 0.94 S5U

TD74-25 294.38 296.30 1.92 S5U

TD74-25 296.30 296.96 0.66 S5U

TD74-26 237.62 240.72 3.10 S5U

TD74-26 240.72 241.80 1.08 S5U

TD74-26 241.80 242.40 0.60 S5U

TD74-27 260.84 262.86 2.02 S5U

TD74-6 128.94 131.62 2.68 S5U

TD74-7 186.26 188.28 2.02 S5U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD74-7 188.28 188.88 0.60 S5U

TD74-7 188.88 189.40 0.52 S5U

TD74-7 189.40 190.58 1.18 S5U

TD74-7 190.58 192.18 1.60 S5U

TD74-8 208.45 210.09 1.64 S5U

TD74-8 210.09 210.55 0.46 S5U

TD74-8 210.55 211.35 0.80 S5U

TD74-8 211.35 211.87 0.52 S5U

TD74-9 62.33 63.11 0.78 S5U

TD74-9 63.11 64.45 1.34 S5U

TD74-9 64.45 65.07 0.62 S5U

TD74-9 65.07 65.45 0.38 S5U

TD74-9 65.95 68.79 2.84 S5U

TD75-34 350.18 350.56 0.38 S5U

TD75-35 425.52 426.33 0.81 S5U

TD75-35 426.33 427.43 1.10 S5U

TD75-35 427.43 428.69 1.26 S5U

TD75-35 428.69 429.21 0.52 S5U

TD75-36 568.51 572.32 3.81 S5U

TD75-40 237.21 237.85 0.64 S5U

TD75-40 237.85 238.97 1.12 S5U

TD75-40 239.49 240.01 0.52 S5U

TD75-40 240.01 240.57 0.56 S5U

TD75-40 240.57 243.01 2.44 S5U

TD75-40 243.01 243.63 0.62 S5U

TD75-40 243.63 245.65 2.02 S5U

TD75-40 245.65 246.59 0.94 S5U

TD75-43 154.07 155.67 1.60 S5U

TD75-43 155.67 159.53 3.86 S5U

TD75-43 160.37 160.79 0.42 S5U

TD75-43 160.79 162.49 1.70 S5U

TD75-43 163.80 165.41 1.61 S5U

TD75-47 49.18 52.12 2.94 S5U

TD75-48 51.18 52.12 0.94 S5U

TD75-48 52.12 53.34 1.22 S5U

TD75-48 53.34 54.41 1.07 S5U

TD75-49 235.94 236.46 0.52 S5U

TD75-49 237.06 237.74 0.68 S5U

TD75-49 240.04 243.40 3.36 S5U

TD75-49 243.40 245.04 1.64 S5U

TD75-49 245.04 245.94 0.90 S5U


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD75-50 46.48 46.94 0.46 S5U

TD75-55 33.61 36.07 2.46 S5U

TD75-55 36.07 37.85 1.78 S5U

TD75-55 37.85 39.69 1.84 S5U

TD75-55 39.69 41.43 1.74 S5U

TD75-55 43.77 46.51 2.74 S5U

TD75-55 46.51 47.97 1.46 S5U

TD75-55 49.33 50.31 0.98 S5U

TD75-57 70.02 71.10 1.08 S5U

TD75-57 73.16 73.84 0.68 S5U

TD75-57 73.84 74.88 1.04 S5U

TD75-57 74.88 76.54 1.66 S5U

TD75-57 76.54 76.90 0.36 S5U

TD75-57 76.90 77.68 0.78 S5U

TD75-57 77.68 83.16 5.48 S5U

TD75-57 83.16 83.60 0.44 S5U

TD75-57 83.60 84.44 0.84 S5U

TD75-57 84.44 88.68 4.24 S5U

TD75-57 88.68 91.18 2.50 S5U

TD75-57 91.18 92.30 1.12 S5U

TD75-70 142.75 144.65 1.90 S5U

TD75-70 144.65 147.67 3.02 S5U

TD76-100 166.97 167.61 0.64 S5U

TD76-100 167.89 168.55 0.66 S5U

TD76-100 170.33 171.81 1.48 S5U

TD76-100 171.81 172.69 0.88 S5U

TD76-100 172.69 173.39 0.70 S5U

TD76-100 173.39 174.07 0.68 S5U

TD76-100 174.07 174.87 0.80 S5U

TD76-100 174.87 175.47 0.60 S5U

TD76-100 175.47 176.21 0.74 S5U

TD76-100 176.21 177.05 0.84 S5U

TD76-100 177.05 177.27 0.22 S5U

TD76-100 177.27 177.91 0.64 S5U

TD76-100 178.49 178.93 0.44 S5U

TD76-100 178.93 179.71 0.78 S5U

TD76-101 164.54 165.26 0.72 S5U

TD76-101 165.26 166.42 1.16 S5U

TD76-101 166.42 167.18 0.76 S5U

TD76-101 167.18 167.56 0.38 S5U

TD76-101 167.56 168.14 0.58 S5U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD76-101 168.14 168.70 0.56 S5U

TD76-101 168.70 169.58 0.88 S5U

TD76-102 51.58 52.06 0.48 S5U

TD76-102 52.06 53.12 1.06 S5U

TD76-102 53.12 53.40 0.28 S5U

TD76-102 53.40 53.78 0.38 S5U

TD76-102 53.78 55.52 1.74 S5U

TD76-102 55.52 55.98 0.46 S5U

TD76-102 55.98 56.30 0.32 S5U

TD76-102 56.30 56.86 0.56 S5U

TD76-102 56.86 57.34 0.48 S5U

TD76-102 57.34 57.94 0.60 S5U

TD76-102 57.94 58.42 0.48 S5U

TD76-102 59.36 59.98 0.62 S5U

TD76-106A 131.98 132.07 0.09 S5U

TD76-85 125.14 126.02 0.88 S5U

TD76-85 126.02 127.32 1.30 S5U

TD76-85 128.40 129.74 1.34 S5U

TD76-85 129.74 131.52 1.78 S5U

TD76-86 151.02 151.62 0.60 S5U

TD76-86 151.62 153.60 1.98 S5U

TD76-87 124.04 125.92 1.88 S5U

TD76-90 187.26 187.88 0.62 S5U

TD76-90 188.22 188.80 0.58 S5U

TD76-90 188.80 190.64 1.84 S5U

TD76-91 267.71 268.37 0.66 S5U

TD76-91 268.37 268.85 0.48 S5U

TD76-91 268.85 270.63 1.78 S5U

TD76-91 270.63 271.11 0.48 S5U

TD76-91 271.11 272.89 1.78 S5U

TD76-91 272.89 273.59 0.70 S5U

TD76-91 275.47 276.05 0.58 S5U

TD76-97 160.79 161.11 0.32 S5U

TD76-97 161.11 162.01 0.90 S5U

TD76-99 501.12 503.00 1.88 S5U

TD76-99 503.00 503.52 0.52 S5U

TD76-99 503.52 504.56 1.04 S5U

TD76-99 504.56 505.26 0.70 S5U

TD76-99 505.26 506.34 1.08 S5U

TD76-99 506.34 507.04 0.70 S5U

TD77-119 44.31 44.63 0.32 S5U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM18-005 51.00 53.30 2.30 S5U

TM18-013 46.00 46.20 0.20 S5U

TM18-013LDCA 44.00 45.40 1.40 S5U

TM18-013LDCA 45.40 46.92 1.52 S5U

TM18-013LDCA 46.92 48.44 1.52 S5U

TM18-013LDCA 48.44 49.28 0.84 S5U

TM18-013LDCB 45.52 47.32 1.80 S5U

TM19-020 41.20 41.50 0.30 S5U

TM19-020 42.20 43.00 0.80 S5U

TM19-020 44.60 45.30 0.70 S5U

TM19-020LDC 45.10 45.38 0.28 S5U

TM19-020LDC 45.38 45.48 0.10 S5U

TM19-020LDC 45.48 45.55 0.07 S5U

TM19-020LDC 45.55 45.90 0.35 S5U

TM19-020LDC 45.90 46.05 0.15 S5U

TM19-020LDC 46.05 46.37 0.32 S5U

TM19-020LDC 46.37 46.70 0.33 S5U

TM19-020LDC 46.70 46.82 0.12 S5U

TM19-020LDC 46.82 47.06 0.24 S5U

TM19-020LDC 47.06 47.28 0.22 S5U

TM19-020LDC 47.28 47.40 0.12 S5U

TM19-020LDC 47.40 47.55 0.15 S5U

TM19-020LDC 47.55 47.67 0.12 S5U

TM19-020LDC 47.67 47.83 0.16 S5U

TM19-020LDC 47.83 47.95 0.12 S5U

TM19-020LDC 47.95 48.03 0.08 S5U

TM19-020LDC 48.03 48.10 0.07 S5U

TM19-021 42.90 43.90 1.00 S5U

TM19-022 82.80 83.70 0.90 S5U

TM19-022 83.80 84.90 1.10 S5U

TM19-022 85.65 86.60 0.95 S5U

TM19-022LDC 94.79 94.94 0.15 S5U

TM19-022LDC 94.94 95.10 0.16 S5U

TM19-022LDC 95.10 95.22 0.12 S5U

TM19-022LDC 95.22 95.55 0.33 S5U

TM19-022LDC 95.55 95.70 0.15 S5U

TM19-022LDC 95.70 96.03 0.33 S5U

TM19-022LDC 96.03 96.62 0.59 S5U

TM19-022LDC 96.62 96.82 0.20 S5U

TM19-022LDC 96.82 97.10 0.28 S5U

TM19-022LDC 97.10 97.49 0.39 S5U


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-022LDC 97.49 97.51 0.02 S5U

TM19-022LDC 97.51 98.02 0.51 S5U

TM19-022LDC 98.02 98.59 0.57 S5U

TM19-022LDC 98.59 99.13 0.54 S5U

TM19-022LDC 99.13 99.57 0.44 S5U

TM19-022LDC 99.57 99.93 0.36 S5U

TM19-022LDC 99.93 100.00 0.07 S5U

TM19-022LDC 100.00 100.57 0.57 S5U

TM19-024 34.30 37.70 3.40 S5U

TM19-024LDC 41.64 41.76 0.12 S5U

TM19-024LDC 41.76 41.79 0.03 S5U

TM19-024LDC 41.79 42.16 0.37 S5U

TM19-024LDC 42.16 42.50 0.34 S5U

TM19-024LDC 42.50 42.90 0.40 S5U

TM19-024LDC 42.90 43.01 0.11 S5U

TM19-024LDC 43.01 43.46 0.45 S5U

TM19-024LDC 43.46 43.99 0.53 S5U

TM19-024LDC 43.99 44.04 0.05 S5U

TM19-024LDC 44.04 44.33 0.29 S5U

TM19-024LDC 44.33 44.45 0.12 S5U

TM19-024LDC 44.45 44.53 0.08 S5U

TM19-024LDC 44.53 44.91 0.38 S5U

TM19-024LDC 44.91 45.07 0.16 S5U

TM19-024LDC 45.07 45.62 0.55 S5U

TM19-024LDC 45.62 45.67 0.05 S5U

TM19-024LDC 45.67 45.86 0.19 S5U

TM19-024LDC 45.86 45.98 0.12 S5U

TM19-024LDC 45.98 46.05 0.07 S5U

TM19-024LDC 46.05 46.29 0.24 S5U

TM19-024LDC 46.29 46.49 0.20 S5U

TM19-024LDC 46.49 46.61 0.12 S5U

TM19-024LDC 46.61 46.69 0.08 S5U

TM19-024LDC 46.69 46.77 0.08 S5U

TM19-024LDC 46.77 47.05 0.28 S5U

TM19-024LDC 47.05 47.25 0.20 S5U

TM19-030 5.80 7.20 1.40 S5U

TM19-039 137.80 140.90 3.10 S5U

TM19-039 141.80 142.20 0.40 S5U

TM19-041 135.50 135.70 0.20 S5U

TM19-041 135.80 138.40 2.60 S5U

TM19-042 124.20 125.00 0.80 S5U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-042 125.60 128.20 2.60 S5U

TM19-042 129.30 130.10 0.80 S5U

TM19-043 24.57 28.01 3.44 S5U

TM19-043 29.00 29.18 0.18 S5U

TM19-058 88.80 89.62 0.82 S5U

TM19-058 89.65 90.04 0.39 S5U

TM19-058 90.05 96.45 6.40 S5U

TR-TM19-005 0.50 3.00 2.50 S5U

TR-TM19-007 0.00 3.80 3.80 S5U

T75-16 16.85 17.93 1.08 S5M

T75-22 8.73 9.43 0.70 S5M

T75-22 9.43 10.37 0.94 S5M

T75-22 10.85 12.57 1.72 S5M

T75-22 12.57 12.77 0.20 S5M

T75-22 13.39 13.85 0.46 S5M

T75-22 13.85 14.51 0.66 S5M

T75-23 11.80 12.92 1.12 S5M

T75-23 12.92 15.08 2.16 S5M

T75-24 13.07 13.43 0.36 S5M

T75-24 13.43 15.03 1.60 S5M

T75-25 5.55 6.15 0.60 S5M

T75-25 6.15 7.33 1.18 S5M

T75-25 7.33 8.93 1.60 S5M

T75-25 8.93 10.87 1.94 S5M

T75-25 10.87 12.93 2.06 S5M

T75-25 12.93 17.79 4.86 S5M

T75-25 17.79 19.33 1.54 S5M

T75-26 19.66 20.22 0.56 S5M

T75-26 20.22 20.88 0.66 S5M

T75-26 22.00 22.56 0.56 S5M

T75-26 22.56 24.68 2.12 S5M

T75-26 24.68 26.00 1.32 S5M

T75-26 26.00 27.50 1.50 S5M

T75-26 28.12 29.90 1.78 S5M

T75-27 17.22 18.30 1.08 S5M

T75-27 18.30 19.16 0.86 S5M

T75-27 19.16 19.96 0.80 S5M

T75-27 19.96 20.28 0.32 S5M

T75-27 20.28 22.88 2.60 S5M

T75-27 22.88 25.26 2.38 S5M

T75-27 25.26 26.68 1.42 S5M

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

T75-27 26.68 27.44 0.76 S5M

T75-27 27.44 28.70 1.26 S5M

T75-27 28.70 29.64 0.94 S5M

T75-28 26.80 27.84 1.04 S5M

T75-28 27.84 29.30 1.46 S5M

T75-28 29.30 30.46 1.16 S5M

T75-28 30.46 31.04 0.58 S5M

T75-28 31.04 31.50 0.46 S5M

T75-28 32.86 33.38 0.52 S5M

T75-28 33.38 33.72 0.34 S5M

T75-28 33.72 35.46 1.74 S5M

T75-28 35.46 35.82 0.36 S5M

T75-29 23.51 24.65 1.14 S5M

T75-29 24.65 24.97 0.32 S5M

T75-29 24.97 26.63 1.66 S5M

T75-29 26.63 27.43 0.80 S5M

T75-29 27.43 28.65 1.22 S5M

T75-29 28.65 29.73 1.08 S5M

T75-29 29.73 30.77 1.04 S5M

T75-29 31.75 32.35 0.60 S5M

T75-29 32.35 34.81 2.46 S5M

T75-29 35.61 36.43 0.82 S5M

T75-29 36.43 37.75 1.32 S5M

T75-29 37.75 38.45 0.70 S5M

T75-30 22.65 23.69 1.04 S5M

T75-30 24.67 25.25 0.58 S5M

T75-30 25.25 26.33 1.08 S5M

T75-30 26.33 27.35 1.02 S5M

T75-34 12.05 12.41 0.36 S5M

TD73-1 436.78 443.48 6.71 S5M

TD74-10 100.19 102.09 1.90 S5M

TD74-10 102.09 102.69 0.60 S5M

TD74-10 102.69 105.55 2.86 S5M

TD74-10 105.55 107.29 1.74 S5M

TD74-16 84.54 85.56 1.02 S5M

TD74-16 85.56 86.32 0.76 S5M

TD74-16 86.32 88.86 2.54 S5M

TD74-16 88.86 89.56 0.70 S5M

TD74-16 89.56 90.42 0.86 S5M

TD74-17 489.42 491.88 2.46 S5M

TD74-17 491.88 492.74 0.86 S5M


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD74-17 492.74 493.82 1.08 S5M

TD74-17 495.08 496.06 0.98 S5M

TD74-18 102.99 106.75 3.76 S5M

TD74-19 94.06 95.10 1.04 S5M

TD74-20 100.24 103.34 3.10 S5M

TD74-20 103.34 104.18 0.84 S5M

TD74-21 208.90 211.96 3.06 S5M

TD74-21 211.96 214.08 2.12 S5M

TD74-21 214.08 214.44 0.36 S5M

TD74-21 215.86 216.52 0.66 S5M

TD74-21 216.52 217.08 0.56 S5M

TD74-21 217.08 219.86 2.78 S5M

TD74-22 59.34 59.52 0.18 S5M

TD74-23 188.20 190.80 2.60 S5M

TD74-23 190.80 192.54 1.74 S5M

TD74-23 192.54 193.06 0.52 S5M

TD74-24 337.89 338.59 0.70 S5M

TD74-24 340.15 343.39 3.24 S5M

TD74-25 301.62 303.64 2.02 S5M

TD74-25 303.64 304.34 0.70 S5M

TD74-26 243.78 245.70 1.92 S5M

TD74-26 245.70 246.22 0.52 S5M

TD74-27 264.84 265.82 0.98 S5M

TD74-27 265.82 266.34 0.52 S5M

TD74-27 267.04 269.86 2.82 S5M

TD74-6 132.48 134.72 2.24 S5M

TD74-6 134.72 135.24 0.52 S5M

TD74-6 135.24 136.85 1.61 S5M

TD74-7 192.66 193.08 0.42 S5M

TD74-7 193.40 199.28 5.88 S5M

TD74-7 199.28 199.94 0.66 S5M

TD74-7 200.80 201.36 0.56 S5M

TD74-8 212.99 215.07 2.08 S5M

TD74-8 215.07 217.75 2.68 S5M

TD74-8 217.75 218.13 0.38 S5M

TD74-8 218.13 218.87 0.74 S5M

TD74-8 218.87 219.45 0.58 S5M

TD74-8 219.45 220.67 1.22 S5M

TD74-9 104.77 106.03 1.26 S5M

TD74-9 106.03 106.53 0.50 S5M

TD74-9 106.53 109.61 3.08 S5M

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD75-34 351.63 352.90 1.27 S5M

TD75-34 352.90 354.36 1.46 S5M

TD75-34 354.36 355.34 0.98 S5M

TD75-34 355.34 355.92 0.58 S5M

TD75-35 432.69 433.91 1.22 S5M

TD75-35 433.91 434.19 0.28 S5M

TD75-35 434.19 434.67 0.48 S5M

TD75-35 435.82 436.18 0.36 S5M

TD75-36 573.34 576.67 3.32 S5M

TD75-40 251.63 254.11 2.48 S5M

TD75-40 254.11 254.55 0.44 S5M

TD75-43 168.27 172.17 3.90 S5M

TD75-43 172.17 173.03 0.86 S5M

TD75-43 173.03 173.45 0.42 S5M

TD75-47 53.50 54.90 1.40 S5M

TD75-47 54.90 57.30 2.40 S5M

TD75-47 57.30 57.84 0.54 S5M

TD75-47 57.84 59.37 1.53 S5M

TD75-48 55.17 56.08 0.91 S5M

TD75-48 57.00 58.22 1.22 S5M

TD75-48 58.22 58.83 0.61 S5M

TD75-48 58.83 59.44 0.61 S5M

TD75-48 59.44 60.12 0.69 S5M

TD75-48 60.12 61.26 1.14 S5M

TD75-48 61.26 61.87 0.61 S5M

TD75-48 61.87 62.64 0.76 S5M

TD75-48 62.64 63.25 0.61 S5M

TD75-48 63.25 63.70 0.46 S5M

TD75-49 248.92 250.60 1.68 S5M

TD75-49 250.60 252.14 1.54 S5M

TD75-50 47.85 48.46 0.61 S5M

TD75-50 48.46 49.83 1.37 S5M

TD75-50 49.83 50.60 0.76 S5M

TD75-50 50.60 51.21 0.61 S5M

TD75-50 51.21 51.82 0.61 S5M

TD75-55 54.45 55.87 1.42 S5M

TD75-55 60.53 62.03 1.50 S5M

TD75-57 103.48 108.92 5.44 S5M

TD76-100 183.23 184.13 0.90 S5M

TD76-100 184.13 184.61 0.48 S5M

TD76-100 184.61 185.17 0.56 S5M

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD76-100 188.23 189.11 0.88 S5M

TD76-100 189.11 190.05 0.94 S5M

TD76-100 190.05 190.65 0.60 S5M

TD76-100 190.65 191.53 0.88 S5M

TD76-100 191.53 192.69 1.16 S5M

TD76-100 192.69 193.21 0.52 S5M

TD76-101 170.80 171.90 1.10 S5M

TD76-101 171.90 173.06 1.16 S5M

TD76-101 173.06 174.00 0.94 S5M

TD76-101 174.00 174.60 0.60 S5M

TD76-101 174.60 174.98 0.38 S5M

TD76-101 174.98 175.30 0.32 S5M

TD76-101 175.30 175.74 0.44 S5M

TD76-101 175.74 176.42 0.68 S5M

TD76-101 176.42 177.06 0.64 S5M

TD76-101 177.06 177.76 0.70 S5M

TD76-101 177.76 178.22 0.46 S5M

TD76-102 63.00 63.56 0.56 S5M

TD76-102 63.56 64.04 0.48 S5M

TD76-102 64.04 64.68 0.64 S5M

TD76-102 64.68 65.72 1.04 S5M

TD76-85 133.20 134.22 1.02 S5M

TD76-85 135.94 137.60 1.66 S5M

TD76-85 137.60 138.28 0.68 S5M

TD76-86 156.66 157.40 0.74 S5M

TD76-86 157.40 158.34 0.94 S5M

TD76-86 158.34 158.82 0.48 S5M

TD76-86 158.82 159.86 1.04 S5M

TD76-86 159.86 160.74 0.88 S5M

TD76-87 126.62 127.00 0.38 S5M

TD76-87 127.00 128.04 1.04 S5M

TD76-87 128.04 128.66 0.62 S5M

TD76-87 128.66 130.10 1.44 S5M

TD76-90 192.28 193.16 0.88 S5M

TD76-90 194.64 195.06 0.42 S5M

TD76-90 195.06 196.10 1.04 S5M

TD76-91 278.11 280.05 1.94 S5M

TD76-91 280.05 281.27 1.22 S5M

TD76-91 281.27 282.35 1.08 S5M

TD76-91 282.35 283.01 0.66 S5M

TD76-91 283.01 283.57 0.56 S5M


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD76-97 162.01 164.13 2.12 S5M

TD76-99 508.88 510.16 1.28 S5M

TD76-99 510.16 510.80 0.64 S5M

TD77-119 45.63 45.81 0.18 S5M

TM18-005 60.02 60.63 0.61 S5M

TM18-013 47.00 49.60 2.60 S5M

TM19-020 45.60 50.00 4.40 S5M

TM19-021 52.90 54.10 1.20 S5M

TM19-022 92.20 92.90 0.70 S5M

TM19-022 93.50 93.90 0.40 S5M

TM19-022LDC 108.32 108.94 0.62 S5M

TM19-022LDC 108.94 109.24 0.30 S5M

TM19-022LDC 109.24 109.47 0.23 S5M

TM19-022LDC 109.47 109.63 0.16 S5M

TM19-022LDC 109.63 109.98 0.35 S5M

TM19-022LDC 109.98 110.03 0.05 S5M

TM19-022LDC 110.03 110.09 0.06 S5M

TM19-022LDC 110.09 110.34 0.25 S5M

TM19-022LDC 110.34 110.84 0.50 S5M

TM19-022LDC 110.84 111.00 0.16 S5M

TM19-022LDC 111.00 111.09 0.09 S5M

TM19-024 47.30 48.20 0.90 S5M

TM19-039 143.30 145.60 2.30 S5M

TM19-040 4.60 5.80 1.20 S5M

TM19-041 139.00 139.60 0.60 S5M

TM19-042 130.90 137.40 6.50 S5M

TM19-043 39.43 40.26 0.83 S5M

TM19-044 5.00 7.20 2.20 S5M

TM19-058 99.14 100.92 1.78 S5M

TM19-058 100.99 101.08 0.09 S5M

TM19-058 101.23 101.32 0.09 S5M

TM19-058 102.12 102.34 0.22 S5M

TR-TM19-005 6.70 10.00 3.30 S5M

T75-22 15.65 16.09 0.44 S5L

T75-22 16.09 17.05 0.96 S5L

T75-22 17.05 19.35 2.30 S5L

T75-22 19.35 20.29 0.94 S5L

T75-22 20.29 20.81 0.52 S5L

T75-22 20.81 21.79 0.98 S5L

T75-23 15.80 16.78 0.98 S5L

T75-24 17.49 19.03 1.54 S5L

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

T75-24 19.03 20.11 1.08 S5L

T75-24 20.11 21.01 0.90 S5L

T75-24 21.01 22.71 1.70 S5L

T75-24 22.71 23.69 0.98 S5L

T75-25 23.17 24.15 0.98 S5L

T75-25 24.15 25.77 1.62 S5L

T75-25 27.13 27.59 0.46 S5L

T75-25 27.59 28.63 1.04 S5L

T75-25 28.63 29.15 0.52 S5L

T75-25 29.15 30.51 1.36 S5L

T75-25 30.51 30.83 0.32 S5L

T75-25 30.83 31.73 0.90 S5L

T75-26 31.50 32.36 0.86 S5L

T75-26 33.38 34.46 1.08 S5L

T75-26 34.46 35.36 0.90 S5L

T75-26 35.36 35.98 0.62 S5L

T75-26 35.98 38.00 2.02 S5L

T75-26 38.00 38.60 0.60 S5L

T75-26 38.60 39.78 1.18 S5L

T75-28 39.44 40.28 0.84 S5L

T75-28 40.28 40.84 0.56 S5L

T75-29 42.79 44.37 1.58 S5L

T75-30 28.11 28.91 0.80 S5L

TD73-1 444.20 455.40 11.20 S5L

TD74-10 108.33 108.89 0.56 S5L

TD74-16 91.40 93.84 2.44 S5L

TD74-16 93.84 94.36 0.52 S5L

TD74-16 94.36 96.80 2.44 S5L

TD74-16 97.42 98.32 0.90 S5L

TD74-17 498.04 499.32 1.28 S5L

TD74-17 499.32 499.98 0.66 S5L

TD74-17 499.98 500.50 0.52 S5L

TD74-17 500.50 501.62 1.12 S5L

TD74-17 501.62 503.04 1.42 S5L

TD74-17 503.04 504.16 1.12 S5L

TD74-18 106.75 108.35 1.60 S5L

TD74-20 109.60 110.22 0.62 S5L

TD74-20 111.20 111.82 0.62 S5L

TD74-21 221.12 221.74 0.62 S5L

TD74-22 63.94 64.38 0.44 S5L

TD74-23 194.28 195.50 1.22 S5L

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD74-23 195.50 197.30 1.80 S5L

TD74-23 197.30 198.00 0.70 S5L

TD74-23 198.00 200.58 2.58 S5L

TD74-23 200.58 201.48 0.90 S5L

TD74-23 201.48 204.96 3.48 S5L

TD74-23 204.96 206.84 1.88 S5L

TD74-24 345.57 346.03 0.46 S5L

TD74-24 346.93 347.81 0.88 S5L

TD74-24 348.47 349.37 0.90 S5L

TD74-24 349.37 350.03 0.66 S5L

TD74-24 350.03 351.07 1.04 S5L

TD74-24 351.07 352.39 1.32 S5L

TD74-24 352.39 353.01 0.62 S5L

TD74-24 353.01 354.27 1.26 S5L

TD74-25 307.92 309.80 1.88 S5L

TD74-25 309.80 313.42 3.62 S5L

TD74-25 315.54 317.52 1.98 S5L

TD74-25 318.40 319.86 1.46 S5L

TD74-25 319.86 322.36 2.50 S5L

TD74-25 322.36 322.98 0.62 S5L

TD74-26 247.48 247.96 0.48 S5L

TD74-26 248.52 250.02 1.50 S5L

TD74-26 250.02 250.74 0.72 S5L

TD74-26 250.96 251.44 0.48 S5L

TD74-27 271.18 272.60 1.42 S5L

TD74-27 272.60 273.40 0.80 S5L

TD74-27 273.40 275.98 2.58 S5L

TD74-27 275.98 277.76 1.78 S5L

TD74-7 203.20 203.76 0.56 S5L

TD74-7 204.70 206.02 1.32 S5L

TD74-8 222.07 222.55 0.48 S5L

TD74-9 109.61 109.93 0.32 S5L

TD74-9 109.93 113.31 3.38 S5L

TD74-9 113.31 113.77 0.46 S5L

TD74-9 113.77 114.79 1.02 S5L

TD74-9 114.79 115.87 1.08 S5L

TD75-34 356.80 357.04 0.24 S5L

TD75-35 437.67 438.09 0.42 S5L

TD75-35 439.47 441.43 1.96 S5L

TD75-35 441.43 441.77 0.34 S5L

TD75-35 441.77 441.95 0.18 S5L


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD75-36 578.26 583.94 5.68 S5L

TD75-40 257.59 258.83 1.24 S5L

TD75-40 258.83 262.59 3.76 S5L

TD75-40 262.59 264.51 1.92 S5L

TD75-40 264.51 266.91 2.40 S5L

TD75-40 266.91 268.99 2.08 S5L

TD75-43 180.59 181.35 0.76 S5L

TD75-43 181.35 181.95 0.60 S5L

TD75-43 181.95 182.75 0.80 S5L

TD75-43 182.75 184.69 1.94 S5L

TD75-48 65.23 65.84 0.61 S5L

TD75-48 65.84 66.45 0.61 S5L

TD75-48 66.45 67.36 0.91 S5L

TD75-48 67.36 68.58 1.22 S5L

TD75-48 68.58 69.80 1.22 S5L

TD75-48 71.17 71.93 0.76 S5L

TD75-49 258.56 259.00 0.44 S5L

TD75-49 259.00 260.16 1.16 S5L

TD75-49 260.16 261.42 1.26 S5L

TD75-49 261.42 262.66 1.24 S5L

TD75-49 264.44 266.86 2.42 S5L

TD75-50 52.27 53.49 1.22 S5L

TD75-50 53.49 54.10 0.61 S5L

TD75-50 54.10 54.41 0.30 S5L

TD75-50 54.41 55.32 0.91 S5L

TD75-55 67.01 68.71 1.70 S5L

TD75-55 70.03 70.97 0.94 S5L

TD75-55 73.13 74.55 1.42 S5L

TD75-57 115.02 116.42 1.40 S5L

TD75-57 116.42 117.02 0.60 S5L

TD75-57 117.02 120.82 3.80 S5L

TD75-57 120.82 121.58 0.76 S5L

TD75-57 121.58 125.46 3.88 S5L

TD76-100 199.19 199.97 0.78 S5L

TD76-100 200.63 201.39 0.76 S5L

TD76-100 201.91 203.79 1.88 S5L

TD76-102 68.44 68.90 0.46 S5L

TD76-102 68.90 69.34 0.44 S5L

TD76-102 69.34 69.60 0.26 S5L

TD76-102 69.60 70.18 0.58 S5L

TD76-102 70.18 70.68 0.50 S5L

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD76-102 70.68 71.08 0.40 S5L

TD76-102 71.08 71.74 0.66 S5L

TD76-102 71.74 72.30 0.56 S5L

TD76-102 72.30 72.78 0.48 S5L

TD76-85 139.02 141.12 2.10 S5L

TD76-85 141.12 146.58 5.46 S5L

TD76-85 146.58 147.80 1.22 S5L

TD76-85 147.80 148.78 0.98 S5L

TD76-86 162.80 163.56 0.76 S5L

TD76-86 164.58 165.00 0.42 S5L

TD76-86 165.00 166.88 1.88 S5L

TD76-86 166.88 167.68 0.80 S5L

TD76-86 167.68 168.26 0.58 S5L

TD76-86 168.26 169.14 0.88 S5L

TD76-86 170.08 170.60 0.52 S5L

TD76-86 171.74 172.26 0.52 S5L

TD76-86 172.26 174.08 1.82 S5L

TD76-86 174.08 174.94 0.86 S5L

TD76-86 174.94 176.68 1.74 S5L

TD76-86 177.00 177.76 0.76 S5L

TD76-87 130.72 131.38 0.66 S5L

TD76-90 196.70 197.42 0.72 S5L

TD76-90 197.42 199.46 2.04 S5L

TD76-90 199.46 200.52 1.06 S5L

TD76-90 201.18 202.26 1.08 S5L

TD76-90 202.58 203.18 0.60 S5L

TD76-90 203.18 203.92 0.74 S5L

TD76-90 203.92 204.22 0.30 S5L

TD76-90 204.22 204.52 0.30 S5L

TD76-90 204.52 205.04 0.52 S5L

TD76-90 205.04 205.50 0.46 S5L

TD76-91 284.99 285.27 0.28 S5L

TD76-91 285.97 286.35 0.38 S5L

TD76-91 286.81 287.81 1.00 S5L

TD76-91 287.81 289.31 1.50 S5L

TD76-91 289.31 289.87 0.56 S5L

TD76-91 289.87 290.25 0.38 S5L

TD76-91 290.25 290.73 0.48 S5L

TD76-91 290.73 291.01 0.28 S5L

TD76-91 292.37 293.07 0.70 S5L

TD76-97 164.13 164.51 0.38 S5L

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD76-97 164.51 165.21 0.70 S5L

TD76-99 514.52 516.18 1.66 S5L

TD76-99 516.18 516.74 0.56 S5L

TD77-119 47.09 47.23 0.14 S5L

TM18-005 65.22 65.66 0.44 S5L

TM18-013 50.50 53.20 2.70 S5L

TM19-020 52.60 52.90 0.30 S5L

TM19-020LDC 48.61 48.88 0.27 S5L

TM19-020LDC 48.88 48.95 0.07 S5L

TM19-020LDC 48.95 49.12 0.17 S5L

TM19-020LDC 49.12 49.22 0.10 S5L

TM19-020LDC 49.22 49.30 0.08 S5L

TM19-020LDC 49.30 49.50 0.20 S5L

TM19-020LDC 49.50 49.63 0.13 S5L

TM19-020LDC 49.63 49.81 0.18 S5L

TM19-020LDC 49.81 50.11 0.30 S5L

TM19-020LDC 50.11 50.17 0.06 S5L

TM19-020LDC 50.17 50.30 0.13 S5L

TM19-020LDC 50.30 50.75 0.45 S5L

TM19-020LDC 50.75 50.91 0.16 S5L

TM19-020LDC 50.91 51.02 0.11 S5L

TM19-020LDC 51.02 51.10 0.08 S5L

TM19-020LDC 51.10 51.42 0.32 S5L

TM19-020LDC 51.42 51.50 0.08 S5L

TM19-020LDC 51.50 51.60 0.10 S5L

TM19-020LDC 51.60 51.72 0.12 S5L

TM19-020LDC 51.72 51.84 0.12 S5L

TM19-020LDC 51.84 51.88 0.04 S5L

TM19-020LDC 51.88 51.98 0.10 S5L

TM19-020LDC 51.98 52.62 0.64 S5L

TM19-020LDC 52.62 52.71 0.09 S5L

TM19-020LDC 52.71 52.81 0.10 S5L

TM19-021 57.60 58.10 0.50 S5L

TM19-021 58.40 59.40 1.00 S5L

TM19-022 97.85 98.90 1.05 S5L

TM19-024 52.60 53.40 0.80 S5L

TM19-037 11.50 14.50 3.00 S5L

TM19-039 146.30 151.80 5.50 S5L

TM19-040 8.80 9.80 1.00 S5L

TM19-040LDC 4.00 6.25 2.25 S5L

TM19-041 140.60 143.10 2.50 S5L


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-041 143.70 150.00 6.30 S5L

TM19-042 137.90 144.00 6.10 S5L

TM19-043 41.59 42.60 1.01 S5L

TM19-044 7.80 8.20 0.40 S5L

TM19-058 107.02 107.48 0.46 S5L

TR-TM19-009 43.50 46.70 3.20 S5L

TR-TM19-013 40.40 48.90 8.50 S5L

CM10-73 38.40 41.00 2.59 S4U

CM11-73 8.53 9.88 1.34 S4U

CM7-73 15.24 17.68 2.44 S4U

T75-13 48.43 49.45 1.02 S4U

T75-13 49.45 50.49 1.04 S4U

T75-13 50.49 52.23 1.74 S4U

T75-14 56.66 58.78 2.12 S4U

T75-14 58.78 60.20 1.42 S4U

T75-15 69.72 70.52 0.80 S4U

T75-16 80.37 80.83 0.46 S4U

T75-17 38.13 38.41 0.28 S4U

T75-18 177.91 178.43 0.52 S4U

T75-18 178.43 178.95 0.52 S4U

T75-18 202.93 204.33 1.40 S4U

T75-18 204.33 204.95 0.62 S4U

T75-18 204.95 206.51 1.56 S4U

T75-20 223.00 223.80 0.80 S4U

T75-20 223.80 225.92 2.12 S4U

T75-20 225.92 226.44 0.52 S4U

T75-20 227.38 227.66 0.28 S4U

T75-20 227.66 228.40 0.74 S4U

T75-20 228.40 228.98 0.58 S4U

T75-20 228.98 229.72 0.74 S4U

T75-21 204.50 209.64 5.14 S4U

T75-21 209.64 212.78 3.14 S4U

T75-21 213.68 215.46 1.78 S4U

T75-22 38.97 39.59 0.62 S4U

T75-22 39.59 39.99 0.40 S4U

T75-22 39.99 41.47 1.48 S4U

T75-23 42.14 43.40 1.26 S4U

T75-23 43.40 44.82 1.42 S4U

T75-23 44.82 46.28 1.46 S4U

T75-23 46.28 46.92 0.64 S4U

T75-24 49.43 51.31 1.88 S4U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

T75-27 43.38 45.36 1.98 S4U

T75-27 45.36 45.82 0.46 S4U

T75-27 45.82 46.14 0.32 S4U

T75-28 51.48 52.70 1.22 S4U

T75-29 57.51 60.21 2.70 S4U

T75-29 60.21 60.85 0.64 S4U

T75-31 87.78 91.74 3.96 S4U

T75-33 68.79 70.29 1.50 S4U

T75-34 63.63 64.11 0.48 S4U

T75-34 64.11 65.07 0.96 S4U

T75-34 65.07 66.49 1.42 S4U

T75-35 66.45 76.20 9.75 S4U

T75-36 63.09 69.49 6.40 S4U

T75-37 59.59 60.61 1.02 S4U

T75-37 60.61 62.49 1.88 S4U

T75-38 45.71 46.31 0.60 S4U

TD73-1 531.88 536.45 4.57 S4U

TD73-3 61.08 62.66 1.58 S4U

TD73-3 62.66 63.42 0.76 S4U

TD73-3 63.42 64.60 1.18 S4U

TD73-3 64.60 66.00 1.40 S4U

TD73-4 99.20 99.97 0.77 S4U

TD73-5 77.95 79.03 1.08 S4U

TD74-10 170.55 173.75 3.20 S4U

TD74-10 173.75 175.11 1.36 S4U

TD74-10 175.11 176.33 1.22 S4U

TD74-10 176.33 176.61 0.28 S4U

TD74-10 176.61 177.75 1.14 S4U

TD74-16 155.50 155.78 0.28 S4U

TD74-17 546.54 547.24 0.70 S4U

TD74-17 547.24 549.16 1.92 S4U

TD74-18 190.59 193.99 3.40 S4U

TD74-19 128.74 129.64 0.90 S4U

TD74-19 129.64 130.94 1.30 S4U

TD74-20 193.46 195.36 1.90 S4U

TD74-21 295.26 296.58 1.32 S4U

TD74-21 296.58 298.42 1.84 S4U

TD74-22 115.30 116.58 1.28 S4U

TD74-23 273.92 275.18 1.26 S4U

TD74-23 275.18 277.58 2.40 S4U

TD74-24 403.65 404.49 0.84 S4U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD74-24 404.49 405.71 1.22 S4U

TD74-25 395.40 396.48 1.08 S4U

TD74-25 396.48 397.84 1.36 S4U

TD74-26 279.34 280.00 0.66 S4U

TD74-27 346.24 346.94 0.70 S4U

TD74-28 32.84 34.14 1.30 S4U

TD74-32 30.47 31.40 0.93 S4U

TD74-6 189.28 191.40 2.12 S4U

TD74-7 310.64 311.12 0.48 S4U

TD74-7 311.12 312.02 0.90 S4U

TD74-7 312.02 313.24 1.22 S4U

TD74-7 313.24 314.04 0.80 S4U

TD74-8 279.49 281.79 2.30 S4U

TD74-9 162.71 164.45 1.74 S4U

TD74-9 164.45 164.75 0.30 S4U

TD75-34 427.22 427.50 0.28 S4U

TD75-34 427.50 428.20 0.70 S4U

TD75-34 428.20 429.14 0.94 S4U

TD75-35 467.38 467.90 0.52 S4U

TD75-36 616.24 619.33 3.08 S4U

TD75-39 54.55 55.35 0.80 S4U

TD75-41 30.46 32.00 1.54 S4U

TD75-42 84.69 86.19 1.50 S4U

TD75-43 241.27 242.49 1.22 S4U

TD75-44 88.35 89.35 1.00 S4U

TD75-45 71.70 72.82 1.12 S4U

TD75-46 57.20 57.44 0.24 S4U

TD75-46 57.44 58.66 1.22 S4U

TD75-46 59.36 60.00 0.64 S4U

TD75-47 129.24 129.76 0.52 S4U

TD75-47 129.76 131.12 1.36 S4U

TD75-48 154.56 155.45 0.88 S4U

TD75-48 155.45 157.28 1.83 S4U

TD75-48 157.28 158.34 1.07 S4U

TD75-49 320.60 321.16 0.56 S4U

TD75-49 321.16 321.92 0.76 S4U

TD75-50 117.74 118.87 1.13 S4U

TD75-50 118.87 120.09 1.22 S4U

TD75-50 120.09 121.01 0.91 S4U

TD75-50 121.01 122.83 1.83 S4U

TD75-50 122.83 123.14 0.30 S4U


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD75-51 41.79 42.63 0.84 S4U

TD75-51 42.63 43.15 0.52 S4U

TD75-51 43.15 44.33 1.18 S4U

TD75-51 44.33 46.49 2.16 S4U

TD75-52 40.81 44.81 3.99 S4U

TD75-53 41.45 43.59 2.13 S4U

TD75-53 43.59 44.04 0.46 S4U

TD75-53 44.04 46.33 2.29 S4U

TD75-53 46.33 47.85 1.52 S4U

TD75-55 166.35 167.73 1.38 S4U

TD75-56 50.71 52.83 2.12 S4U

TD75-56 52.83 53.21 0.38 S4U

TD75-56 53.21 54.29 1.08 S4U

TD75-56 54.29 54.77 0.48 S4U

TD75-56 54.77 55.47 0.70 S4U

TD75-57 230.27 231.00 0.73 S4U

TD75-58 22.18 23.54 1.36 S4U

TD75-60 0.09 4.43 4.34 S4U

TD75-70 172.43 173.15 0.72 S4U

TD75-73 18.28 20.30 2.02 S4U

TD75-73 20.30 20.62 0.32 S4U

TD75-74 0.18 1.56 1.38 S4U

TD75-76 36.27 38.10 1.83 S4U

TD75-76 38.10 39.32 1.22 S4U

TD75-76 39.32 40.84 1.52 S4U

TD75-76 40.84 41.15 0.30 S4U

TD75-81 92.22 92.62 0.40 S4U

TD75-81 92.62 93.36 0.74 S4U

TD75-81 93.36 94.38 1.02 S4U

TD75-81 94.38 94.84 0.46 S4U

TD75-81 94.84 95.42 0.58 S4U

TD75-81 95.42 96.28 0.86 S4U

TD75-82 95.86 96.48 0.62 S4U

TD75-83 111.10 111.74 0.64 S4U

TD75-83 111.74 112.46 0.72 S4U

TD75-83 112.46 113.52 1.06 S4U

TD75-84 64.94 65.62 0.68 S4U

TD75-84 66.10 67.16 1.06 S4U

TD76-100 254.99 255.27 0.28 S4U

TD76-100 255.27 256.63 1.36 S4U

TD76-100 257.69 258.63 0.94 S4U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD76-101 236.12 236.92 0.80 S4U

TD76-101 236.92 237.22 0.30 S4U

TD76-101 237.22 237.64 0.42 S4U

TD76-101 237.64 238.10 0.46 S4U

TD76-102 148.52 148.98 0.46 S4U

TD76-102 148.98 149.50 0.52 S4U

TD76-102 149.50 149.96 0.46 S4U

TD76-106A 147.33 149.31 1.98 S4U

TD76-107 82.28 83.34 1.06 S4U

TD76-85 214.34 215.80 1.46 S4U

TD76-85 215.80 217.46 1.66 S4U

TD76-86 248.60 249.12 0.52 S4U

TD76-86 249.12 250.20 1.08 S4U

TD76-86 250.20 250.76 0.56 S4U

TD76-87 157.34 157.76 0.42 S4U

TD76-90 267.80 268.34 0.54 S4U

TD76-90 268.34 269.06 0.72 S4U

TD76-90 269.06 270.14 1.08 S4U

TD76-90 270.14 270.70 0.56 S4U

TD76-91 349.11 349.43 0.32 S4U

TD76-91 349.95 351.27 1.32 S4U

TD76-96 30.85 36.85 6.00 S4U

TD76-97 192.49 192.81 0.32 S4U

TD76-98 34.30 35.56 1.26 S4U

TD76-99 559.30 559.48 0.18 S4U

TD77-119 94.37 95.31 0.94 S4U

TM18-001 17.24 20.01 2.77 S4U

TM18-002 9.00 14.20 5.20 S4U

TM18-004 61.68 63.42 1.74 S4U

TM18-004LDC 63.14 68.40 5.26 S4U

TM18-005 101.85 102.10 0.25 S4U

TM18-005 102.10 103.85 1.75 S4U

TM18-005 103.85 108.00 4.15 S4U

TM18-006 21.62 22.20 0.58 S4U

TM18-012 51.92 52.40 0.48 S4U

TM18-012LDC 51.60 51.63 0.03 S4U

TM18-012LDC 51.63 51.97 0.34 S4U

TM18-013 98.50 100.00 1.50 S4U

TM18-015 22.00 24.70 2.70 S4U

TM19-017 45.80 46.70 0.90 S4U

TM19-020 70.40 72.20 1.80 S4U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-020LDC 81.78 82.02 0.24 S4U

TM19-021 99.80 100.20 0.40 S4U

TM19-021 100.50 100.90 0.40 S4U

TM19-025 30.80 31.60 0.80 S4U

TM19-029 7.80 8.40 0.60 S4U

TM19-029LDC 6.80 7.60 0.80 S4U

TM19-030 67.10 69.00 1.90 S4U

TM19-035 36.90 37.60 0.70 S4U

TM19-035 38.00 39.60 1.60 S4U

TM19-035 39.90 40.20 0.30 S4U

TM19-035LDC 40.20 41.20 1.00 S4U

TM19-035LDC 42.10 43.60 1.50 S4U

TM19-036 39.60 40.00 0.40 S4U

TM19-036 40.60 41.30 0.70 S4U

TM19-036 41.90 43.00 1.10 S4U

TM19-037 21.60 22.60 1.00 S4U

TM19-040 18.30 20.90 2.60 S4U

TM19-040LDC 18.03 18.65 0.62 S4U

TM19-040LDC 18.65 19.15 0.50 S4U

TM19-040LDC 19.15 19.17 0.02 S4U

TM19-040LDC 19.17 19.74 0.57 S4U

TM19-040LDC 19.74 19.78 0.04 S4U

TM19-040LDC 19.78 20.19 0.41 S4U

TM19-040LDC 20.19 20.52 0.33 S4U

TM19-040LDC 20.52 20.55 0.03 S4U

TM19-040LDC 20.55 20.74 0.19 S4U

TM19-040LDC 20.74 20.76 0.02 S4U

TM19-040LDC 20.76 20.81 0.05 S4U

TM19-040LDC 20.81 20.91 0.10 S4U

TM19-040LDC 20.91 20.93 0.02 S4U

TM19-040LDC 20.93 21.04 0.11 S4U

TM19-040LDC 21.04 21.15 0.11 S4U

TM19-040LDC 21.15 21.21 0.06 S4U

TM19-040LDC 21.21 21.24 0.03 S4U

TM19-040LDC 21.24 21.29 0.05 S4U

TM19-040LDC 21.29 21.36 0.07 S4U

TM19-040LDC 21.36 21.40 0.04 S4U

TM19-040LDC 21.40 21.74 0.34 S4U

TM19-040LDC 21.74 21.94 0.20 S4U

TM19-043 55.20 55.70 0.50 S4U

TM19-044 15.60 17.40 1.80 S4U


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-044 17.60 17.80 0.20 S4U

TM19-044 18.40 18.80 0.40 S4U

TM19-044 19.20 19.40 0.20 S4U

TM19-044 19.60 19.80 0.20 S4U

TM19-044 20.00 20.40 0.40 S4U

TM19-044 20.60 20.80 0.20 S4U

TM19-044 21.20 21.60 0.40 S4U

TM19-044 21.60 21.80 0.20 S4U

TM19-046 33.53 36.58 3.05 S4U

TM19-047 24.38 27.43 3.05 S4U

TM19-048 14.00 14.30 0.30 S4U

TM19-048 14.50 14.90 0.40 S4U

TM19-048 15.20 15.70 0.50 S4U

TM19-048LDC 12.86 13.80 0.94 S4U

TM19-048LDC 13.80 14.09 0.29 S4U

TM19-048LDC 14.09 15.28 1.19 S4U

TM19-048LDC 15.28 15.43 0.15 S4U

TM19-048LDC 15.43 15.88 0.45 S4U

TM19-048LDC 15.88 16.21 0.33 S4U

TM19-050 43.10 44.20 1.10 S4U

TM19-050LDC 43.16 43.28 0.12 S4U

TM19-050LDC 43.28 44.08 0.80 S4U

TM19-050LDC 44.08 44.48 0.40 S4U

TM19-050LDC 44.48 44.59 0.11 S4U

TM19-050LDC 44.59 44.79 0.20 S4U

TM19-050LDC 44.79 45.49 0.70 S4U

TM19-050LDC 45.49 45.59 0.10 S4U

TM19-056 30.40 30.90 0.50 S4U

TM19-057 30.70 33.10 2.40 S4U

TM19-058 149.77 150.34 0.57 S4U

TM19-058 150.37 151.06 0.69 S4U

TR-TM19-008 6.84 13.78 6.94 S4U

TR-TM19-009 17.40 23.40 6.00 S4U

TR-TM19-009 24.40 26.40 2.00 S4U

TR-TM19-011 6.50 8.20 1.70 S4U

TR-TM19-012 1.50 4.00 2.50 S4U

TR-TM19-013 18.30 25.60 7.30 S4U

TR-TM19-013 27.60 30.10 2.50 S4U

CM10-73 41.24 41.61 0.37 S4M

T75-15 71.40 72.02 0.62 S4M

T75-16 81.35 82.21 0.86 S4M

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

T75-16 82.21 83.43 1.22 S4M

T75-17 39.59 41.51 1.92 S4M

T75-18 163.23 164.59 1.36 S4M

T75-20 212.32 213.78 1.46 S4M

T75-20 213.78 217.22 3.44 S4M

T75-20 217.22 217.68 0.46 S4M

T75-20 217.68 218.86 1.18 S4M

T75-21 195.90 197.86 1.96 S4M

T75-21 198.48 199.18 0.70 S4M

T75-22 46.49 47.19 0.70 S4M

T75-22 47.19 48.65 1.46 S4M

T75-22 48.65 49.03 0.38 S4M

T75-22 49.03 49.91 0.88 S4M

T75-23 55.54 56.16 0.62 S4M

T75-24 53.23 54.97 1.74 S4M

T75-24 54.97 55.87 0.90 S4M

T75-27 54.28 54.84 0.56 S4M

T75-27 54.84 55.22 0.38 S4M

T75-27 55.22 56.12 0.90 S4M

T75-27 56.12 56.44 0.32 S4M

T75-27 56.44 57.58 1.14 S4M

T75-27 57.58 57.90 0.32 S4M

T75-28 53.54 54.44 0.90 S4M

T75-33 71.00 72.31 1.31 S4M

T75-33 72.31 72.93 0.62 S4M

T75-33 72.93 74.71 1.78 S4M

T75-33 74.71 75.31 0.60 S4M

T75-33 75.31 76.07 0.76 S4M

T75-34 67.53 68.67 1.14 S4M

T75-34 68.67 69.39 0.72 S4M

T75-34 69.39 69.95 0.56 S4M

T75-37 63.95 64.95 1.00 S4M

T75-37 64.95 65.61 0.66 S4M

T75-37 65.61 66.21 0.60 S4M

T75-37 66.21 66.83 0.62 S4M

T75-37 66.83 69.13 2.30 S4M

T75-38 46.91 48.68 1.77 S4M

TD73-1 536.60 541.02 4.42 S4M

TD73-4 100.43 101.08 0.65 S4M

TD73-5 80.01 80.63 0.62 S4M

TD73-5 80.63 81.09 0.46 S4M

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD73-5 81.09 82.45 1.36 S4M

TD73-5 82.45 83.11 0.66 S4M

TD74-16 156.54 159.50 2.96 S4M

TD74-16 159.50 161.06 1.56 S4M

TD74-16 161.06 163.78 2.72 S4M

TD74-16 163.78 164.34 0.56 S4M

TD74-17 551.28 551.66 0.38 S4M

TD74-17 551.66 553.92 2.26 S4M

TD74-17 553.92 555.56 1.64 S4M

TD74-18 195.21 197.65 2.44 S4M

TD74-18 197.65 199.39 1.74 S4M

TD74-20 196.52 197.32 0.80 S4M

TD74-20 197.32 197.84 0.52 S4M

TD74-21 300.40 301.42 1.02 S4M

TD74-21 301.42 303.28 1.86 S4M

TD74-21 303.28 304.16 0.88 S4M

TD74-22 117.14 117.80 0.66 S4M

TD74-23 277.58 277.88 0.30 S4M

TD74-23 277.88 278.38 0.50 S4M

TD74-24 406.75 407.49 0.74 S4M

TD74-25 399.26 403.30 4.04 S4M

TD74-26 280.80 280.98 0.18 S4M

TD74-27 346.94 348.12 1.18 S4M

TD74-28 35.10 36.12 1.02 S4M

TD74-28 36.12 37.10 0.98 S4M

TD74-28 37.90 38.32 0.42 S4M

TD74-32 32.31 33.53 1.22 S4M

TD74-6 191.90 193.50 1.60 S4M

TD74-7 315.22 316.16 0.94 S4M

TD74-8 282.10 285.41 3.31 S4M

TD74-9 164.75 166.39 1.64 S4M

TD74-9 166.39 166.71 0.32 S4M

TD75-34 430.56 432.82 2.26 S4M

TD75-35 468.70 470.24 1.54 S4M

TD75-36 624.84 625.30 0.46 S4M

TD75-39 56.01 57.09 1.08 S4M

TD75-41 46.20 47.04 0.84 S4M

TD75-42 87.33 90.61 3.28 S4M

TD75-43 243.81 244.79 0.98 S4M

TD75-43 244.79 245.27 0.48 S4M

TD75-43 245.27 246.49 1.22 S4M


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD75-43 246.49 247.19 0.70 S4M

TD75-43 247.19 247.81 0.62 S4M

TD75-44 90.09 92.75 2.66 S4M

TD75-44 92.75 93.53 0.78 S4M

TD75-45 74.10 74.60 0.50 S4M

TD75-46 60.78 61.58 0.80 S4M

TD75-46 61.58 61.86 0.28 S4M

TD75-46 61.86 63.50 1.64 S4M

TD75-47 132.50 133.66 1.16 S4M

TD75-47 133.66 135.46 1.80 S4M

TD75-47 135.46 136.16 0.70 S4M

TD75-48 159.41 160.02 0.61 S4M

TD75-48 160.02 160.93 0.91 S4M

TD75-48 160.93 162.15 1.22 S4M

TD75-49 322.68 323.38 0.70 S4M

TD75-55 169.37 171.21 1.84 S4M

TD75-55 171.21 172.95 1.74 S4M

TD75-57 247.88 248.44 0.56 S4M

TD75-58 23.86 24.14 0.28 S4M

TD75-70 173.71 176.13 2.42 S4M

TD75-73 29.46 32.24 2.78 S4M

TD75-73 32.48 32.70 0.22 S4M

TD75-74 2.60 4.34 1.74 S4M

TD75-76 56.39 57.00 0.61 S4M

TD75-81 96.56 96.92 0.36 S4M

TD75-81 97.50 98.20 0.70 S4M

TD75-81 98.88 99.88 1.00 S4M

TD75-82 96.95 101.09 4.14 S4M

TD75-83 115.64 116.36 0.72 S4M

TD75-84 67.88 68.88 1.00 S4M

TD75-84 69.58 70.76 1.18 S4M

TD75-84 70.76 71.08 0.32 S4M

TD76-100 265.63 266.21 0.58 S4M

TD76-100 266.49 267.69 1.20 S4M

TD76-101 239.44 239.96 0.52 S4M

TD76-101 240.40 240.78 0.38 S4M

TD76-101 240.78 242.28 1.50 S4M

TD76-102 150.68 151.00 0.32 S4M

TD76-102 151.00 151.60 0.60 S4M

TD76-102 151.60 152.18 0.58 S4M

TD76-102 152.18 152.72 0.54 S4M

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD76-106A 151.61 152.07 0.46 S4M

TD76-106A 152.07 152.55 0.48 S4M

TD76-106A 152.55 153.09 0.54 S4M

TD76-107 84.86 85.18 0.32 S4M

TD76-107 85.18 85.50 0.32 S4M

TD76-107 85.50 86.12 0.62 S4M

TD76-107 86.12 87.36 1.24 S4M

TD76-85 218.58 219.20 0.62 S4M

TD76-85 219.20 220.04 0.84 S4M

TD76-85 220.04 221.92 1.88 S4M

TD76-86 251.84 252.68 0.84 S4M

TD76-87 159.26 159.72 0.46 S4M

TD76-90 271.78 272.96 1.18 S4M

TD76-90 272.96 273.80 0.84 S4M

TD76-90 273.80 274.66 0.86 S4M

TD76-90 274.66 275.10 0.44 S4M

TD76-90 275.10 275.72 0.62 S4M

TD76-91 352.67 353.09 0.42 S4M

TD76-98 36.88 37.64 0.76 S4M

TD76-98 37.64 39.52 1.88 S4M

TD76-98 39.52 40.46 0.94 S4M

TD76-99 559.96 560.42 0.46 S4M

TD77-119 96.43 98.51 2.08 S4M

TD77-119 98.51 99.67 1.16 S4M

TD77-119 99.67 100.53 0.86 S4M

TD77-119 100.53 101.41 0.88 S4M

TD77-119 101.41 101.69 0.28 S4M

TD77-119 102.63 103.15 0.52 S4M

TM18-002 17.40 19.80 2.40 S4M

TM18-002 19.80 21.00 1.20 S4M

TM18-002 21.26 21.62 0.36 S4M

TM18-004 66.72 67.00 0.28 S4M

TM18-004LDC 74.42 74.95 0.53 S4M

TM18-005 110.55 113.33 2.78 S4M

TM18-006 22.50 27.70 5.20 S4M

TM18-012 52.60 54.80 2.20 S4M

TM18-012LDC 52.02 52.39 0.37 S4M

TM18-012LDC 52.39 52.55 0.16 S4M

TM18-013 101.00 103.50 2.50 S4M

TM19-017 46.90 49.20 2.30 S4M

TM19-020 72.40 74.40 2.00 S4M

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-020LDC 82.06 82.34 0.28 S4M

TM19-021 101.20 102.70 1.50 S4M

TM19-021 102.90 103.40 0.50 S4M

TM19-025 31.90 33.90 2.00 S4M

TM19-035 55.90 59.20 3.30 S4M

TM19-035 62.30 62.80 0.50 S4M

TM19-035 63.90 72.50 8.60 S4M

TM19-035LDC 63.16 63.23 0.07 S4M

TM19-035LDC 63.23 63.60 0.37 S4M

TM19-035LDC 63.60 63.70 0.10 S4M

TM19-035LDC 64.23 64.58 0.35 S4M

TM19-035LDC 64.58 64.69 0.11 S4M

TM19-035LDC 64.69 64.71 0.02 S4M

TM19-035LDC 64.71 64.91 0.20 S4M

TM19-035LDC 64.91 65.15 0.24 S4M

TM19-035LDC 65.15 65.60 0.45 S4M

TM19-035LDC 66.00 66.25 0.25 S4M

TM19-035LDC 66.25 66.34 0.09 S4M

TM19-035LDC 66.34 66.46 0.12 S4M

TM19-035LDC 66.63 66.80 0.17 S4M

TM19-035LDC 66.80 67.50 0.70 S4M

TM19-035LDC 67.50 67.55 0.05 S4M

TM19-035LDC 67.55 67.95 0.40 S4M

TM19-035LDC 67.95 68.00 0.05 S4M

TM19-035LDC 68.53 69.00 0.47 S4M

TM19-035LDC 69.00 69.18 0.18 S4M

TM19-035LDC 69.18 69.31 0.13 S4M

TM19-035LDC 69.51 69.91 0.40 S4M

TM19-035LDC 69.91 70.61 0.70 S4M

TM19-035LDC 70.61 70.81 0.20 S4M

TM19-035LDC 70.81 71.29 0.48 S4M

TM19-035LDC 71.29 71.89 0.60 S4M

TM19-035LDC 71.89 72.16 0.27 S4M

TM19-035LDC 72.16 72.21 0.05 S4M

TM19-035LDC 72.21 72.25 0.04 S4M

TM19-035LDC 72.25 72.80 0.55 S4M

TM19-035LDC 72.80 73.04 0.24 S4M

TM19-035LDC 73.04 73.14 0.10 S4M

TM19-035LDC 73.18 73.26 0.08 S4M

TM19-035LDC 73.41 73.66 0.25 S4M

TM19-035LDC 73.66 73.70 0.04 S4M


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-035LDC 73.70 73.80 0.10 S4M

TM19-035LDC 74.80 75.00 0.20 S4M

TM19-035LDC 75.12 75.21 0.09 S4M

TM19-035LDC 75.28 75.33 0.05 S4M

TM19-035LDC 75.93 76.12 0.19 S4M

TM19-035LDC 76.52 76.66 0.14 S4M

TM19-035LDC 76.66 76.73 0.07 S4M

TM19-035LDC 77.28 77.37 0.09 S4M

TM19-035LDC 77.67 77.75 0.08 S4M

TM19-035LDC 78.05 78.21 0.16 S4M

TM19-035LDC 78.21 79.34 1.13 S4M

TM19-035LDC 79.45 79.71 0.26 S4M

TM19-036 43.60 44.20 0.60 S4M

TM19-036 44.40 44.90 0.50 S4M

TM19-036 45.60 46.60 1.00 S4M

TM19-036 47.90 48.10 0.20 S4M

TM19-036 48.70 49.10 0.40 S4M

TM19-036 50.00 51.90 1.90 S4M

TM19-037 22.90 26.90 4.00 S4M

TM19-037 27.90 28.30 0.40 S4M

TM19-040 21.20 21.80 0.60 S4M

TM19-040 22.70 23.10 0.40 S4M

TM19-040 24.10 24.50 0.40 S4M

TM19-040 24.90 25.60 0.70 S4M

TM19-040 27.30 28.50 1.20 S4M

TM19-040 28.80 30.10 1.30 S4M

TM19-040 30.60 33.00 2.40 S4M

TM19-040LDC 23.07 23.19 0.12 S4M

TM19-040LDC 23.53 23.93 0.40 S4M

TM19-040LDC 23.93 24.33 0.40 S4M

TM19-040LDC 24.33 24.73 0.40 S4M

TM19-040LDC 24.73 24.78 0.05 S4M

TM19-040LDC 24.78 24.80 0.02 S4M

TM19-040LDC 24.80 24.89 0.09 S4M

TM19-040LDC 24.89 25.13 0.24 S4M

TM19-040LDC 25.13 25.28 0.15 S4M

TM19-040LDC 26.95 27.17 0.22 S4M

TM19-040LDC 27.17 27.24 0.07 S4M

TM19-040LDC 27.24 27.64 0.40 S4M

TM19-040LDC 27.64 27.73 0.09 S4M

TM19-040LDC 27.73 28.27 0.54 S4M

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-040LDC 28.27 28.37 0.10 S4M

TM19-040LDC 28.37 28.55 0.18 S4M

TM19-040LDC 28.55 28.68 0.13 S4M

TM19-040LDC 28.68 29.26 0.58 S4M

TM19-040LDC 29.26 29.56 0.30 S4M

TM19-040LDC 29.56 29.65 0.09 S4M

TM19-040LDC 29.65 30.12 0.47 S4M

TM19-040LDC 30.12 30.16 0.04 S4M

TM19-040LDC 30.16 30.25 0.09 S4M

TM19-040LDC 30.25 30.29 0.04 S4M

TM19-040LDC 30.29 30.59 0.30 S4M

TM19-040LDC 30.59 30.63 0.04 S4M

TM19-040LDC 30.63 30.76 0.13 S4M

TM19-040LDC 30.76 30.98 0.22 S4M

TM19-040LDC 30.98 31.35 0.37 S4M

TM19-040LDC 31.35 32.02 0.67 S4M

TM19-040LDC 32.02 32.03 0.01 S4M

TM19-040LDC 32.03 32.48 0.45 S4M

TM19-040LDC 32.48 33.19 0.71 S4M

TM19-043 57.08 60.26 3.18 S4M

TM19-043 60.70 60.91 0.21 S4M

TM19-044 25.00 27.40 2.40 S4M

TM19-044 27.60 28.00 0.40 S4M

TM19-044 28.60 28.80 0.20 S4M

TM19-044 29.60 29.80 0.20 S4M

TM19-044 30.40 30.80 0.40 S4M

TM19-050 44.30 44.80 0.50 S4M

TM19-056 31.40 32.90 1.50 S4M

TM19-058 151.67 157.78 6.11 S4M

TR-TM19-008 1.00 5.84 4.84 S4M

TR-TM19-009 11.10 13.30 2.20 S4M

TR-TM19-009 14.80 16.60 1.80 S4M

TR-TM19-010 5.00 7.00 2.00 S4M

TR-TM19-010 7.50 18.00 10.50 S4M

TR-TM19-011 1.50 6.00 4.50 S4M

TR-TM19-012 6.20 9.30 3.10 S4M

TR-TM19-013 8.00 10.50 2.10 S4M

TR-TM19-013 12.80 15.80 3.00 S4M

CM10-73 43.59 44.07 0.49 S4L

T75-15 72.34 73.80 1.46 S4L

T75-16 84.93 85.45 0.52 S4L

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

T75-16 85.45 85.91 0.46 S4L

T75-16 85.91 86.67 0.76 S4L

T75-16 86.67 88.09 1.42 S4L

T75-18 156.27 156.89 0.62 S4L

T75-18 158.73 159.85 1.12 S4L

T75-20 198.06 199.70 1.64 S4L

T75-20 200.18 200.70 0.52 S4L

T75-20 203.48 204.56 1.08 S4L

T75-20 204.56 205.08 0.52 S4L

T75-20 205.08 205.78 0.70 S4L

T75-21 177.12 178.50 1.38 S4L

T75-21 185.88 186.64 0.76 S4L

T75-22 54.81 56.97 2.16 S4L

T75-22 56.97 57.27 0.30 S4L

T75-23 68.24 70.12 1.88 S4L

T75-23 70.12 70.50 0.38 S4L

T75-23 70.50 71.06 0.56 S4L

T75-24 64.27 66.95 2.68 S4L

T75-24 66.95 67.67 0.72 S4L

T75-34 70.33 72.57 2.24 S4L

T75-38 49.19 50.55 1.36 S4L

T75-38 50.55 52.29 1.74 S4L

TD73-1 551.84 552.80 0.98 S4L

TD73-4 101.78 103.33 1.55 S4L

TD73-4 103.33 103.78 0.45 S4L

TD73-4 103.78 105.08 1.75 S4L

TD74-17 565.44 566.00 0.56 S4L

TD74-20 197.84 200.06 2.22 S4L

TD74-23 279.64 283.28 3.64 S4L

TD74-24 407.93 408.91 0.98 S4L

TD74-28 40.30 41.62 1.32 S4L

TD74-28 41.62 42.18 0.56 S4L

TD74-32 36.58 37.34 0.76 S4L

TD74-32 37.34 37.80 0.46 S4L

TD74-32 37.80 38.41 0.61 S4L

TD74-6 194.70 195.16 0.46 S4L

TD74-6 195.16 196.20 1.04 S4L

TD74-6 196.20 197.08 0.88 S4L

TD74-6 197.08 197.80 0.72 S4L

TD74-6 197.80 198.82 1.02 S4L

TD74-7 316.68 318.76 2.08 S4L


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD74-7 318.76 319.40 0.64 S4L

TD74-8 291.11 291.59 0.48 S4L

TD74-9 166.71 169.39 2.68 S4L

TD75-34 439.78 440.20 0.42 S4L

TD75-35 472.18 473.16 0.98 S4L

TD75-35 473.16 474.58 1.42 S4L

TD75-36 13.25 13.73 0.48 S4L

TD75-36 14.99 15.83 0.84 S4L

TD75-36 15.83 16.97 1.14 S4L

TD75-36 626.06 627.28 1.22 S4L

TD75-39 57.09 57.85 0.76 S4L

TD75-39 57.85 58.83 0.98 S4L

TD75-41 58.28 58.80 0.52 S4L

TD75-43 265.29 266.85 1.56 S4L

TD75-45 74.84 75.60 0.76 S4L

TD75-45 75.60 75.84 0.24 S4L

TD75-45 75.84 77.20 1.36 S4L

TD75-55 190.55 191.39 0.84 S4L

TD75-55 192.19 192.99 0.80 S4L

TD75-57 249.58 250.82 1.24 S4L

TD75-76 57.61 58.83 1.22 S4L

TD75-81 100.80 101.98 1.18 S4L

TD75-81 101.98 102.78 0.80 S4L

TD75-81 102.78 103.56 0.78 S4L

TD75-81 103.56 103.82 0.26 S4L

TD75-81 103.82 104.90 1.08 S4L

TD75-82 102.63 105.92 3.29 S4L

TD75-83 117.24 117.82 0.58 S4L

TD75-83 117.82 118.26 0.44 S4L

TD75-83 118.26 119.18 0.92 S4L

TD75-83 119.18 119.52 0.34 S4L

TD75-83 119.52 120.68 1.16 S4L

TD75-83 120.68 121.14 0.46 S4L

TD75-83 121.14 121.72 0.58 S4L

TD75-83 121.72 121.98 0.26 S4L

TD75-83 121.98 122.56 0.58 S4L

TD75-84 71.66 72.14 0.48 S4L

TD75-84 72.14 73.30 1.16 S4L

TD75-84 73.30 73.72 0.42 S4L

TD75-84 73.72 75.04 1.32 S4L

TD75-84 75.04 75.28 0.24 S4L

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD75-84 75.28 75.80 0.52 S4L

TD76-100 270.11 270.59 0.48 S4L

TD76-100 271.05 272.49 1.44 S4L

TD76-102 166.14 166.70 0.56 S4L

TD76-106A 153.39 154.01 0.62 S4L

TD76-106A 154.01 154.19 0.18 S4L

TD76-106A 154.19 155.15 0.96 S4L

TD76-106A 155.15 155.79 0.64 S4L

TD76-106A 155.79 156.21 0.42 S4L

TD76-106A 156.21 156.89 0.68 S4L

TD76-106A 156.89 158.09 1.20 S4L

TD76-106A 158.09 159.11 1.02 S4L

TD76-106A 159.11 160.67 1.56 S4L

TD76-106A 160.67 161.17 0.50 S4L

TD76-107 88.36 88.84 0.48 S4L

TD76-107 89.20 89.70 0.50 S4L

TD76-107 89.70 90.40 0.70 S4L

TD76-107 90.40 90.88 0.48 S4L

TD76-107 90.88 91.74 0.86 S4L

TD76-107 91.74 92.78 1.04 S4L

TD76-107 92.78 93.34 0.56 S4L

TD76-85 237.82 238.82 1.00 S4L

TD76-86 253.30 254.34 1.04 S4L

TD76-86 254.34 255.88 1.54 S4L

TD76-87 159.87 160.02 0.15 S4L

TD76-91 353.53 354.41 0.88 S4L

TD76-91 354.41 355.49 1.08 S4L

TD76-91 355.49 355.87 0.38 S4L

TD76-98 48.12 49.72 1.60 S4L

TD76-98 49.72 50.20 0.48 S4L

TD76-98 50.72 51.22 0.50 S4L

TD76-98 51.22 51.88 0.66 S4L

TD76-98 51.88 52.68 0.80 S4L

TD76-98 52.68 54.70 2.02 S4L

TD76-99 561.32 563.24 1.92 S4L

TD77-119 110.49 111.21 0.72 S4L

TD77-119 111.21 112.37 1.16 S4L

TD77-119 112.37 112.57 0.20 S4L

TD77-119 112.57 113.09 0.52 S4L

TM18-002 25.70 26.10 0.40 S4L

TM18-004 73.33 77.57 4.24 S4L

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM18-004LDC 75.18 75.93 0.75 S4L

TM18-004LDC 75.93 76.75 0.82 S4L

TM18-004LDC 76.75 77.16 0.41 S4L

TM18-004LDC 77.16 77.50 0.34 S4L

TM18-004LDC 77.50 78.00 0.50 S4L

TM18-004LDC 78.00 78.68 0.68 S4L

TM18-005 131.91 137.02 5.11 S4L

TM18-006 28.00 28.42 0.42 S4L

TM18-012 55.20 55.90 0.70 S4L

TM18-012LDC 53.29 53.48 0.19 S4L

TM18-012LDC 53.48 54.15 0.67 S4L

TM18-012LDC 54.15 54.81 0.66 S4L

TM18-012LDC 54.81 55.41 0.60 S4L

TM19-017 52.80 56.40 3.60 S4L

TM19-019 10.10 14.10 4.00 S4L

TM19-021 106.60 107.50 0.90 S4L

TM19-026 9.60 10.20 0.60 S4L

TM19-029 9.75 9.90 0.15 S4L

TM19-029LDC 8.20 8.50 0.30 S4L

TM19-035 82.60 83.00 0.40 S4L

TM19-035 84.50 85.10 0.60 S4L

TM19-035 86.70 87.10 0.40 S4L

TM19-036 65.80 66.40 0.60 S4L

TM19-037 32.80 33.60 0.80 S4L

TM19-037 35.20 37.00 1.80 S4L

TM19-040 42.30 43.20 0.90 S4L

TM19-040 44.00 44.20 0.20 S4L

TM19-043 66.37 66.70 0.33 S4L

TM19-043 66.90 67.00 0.10 S4L

TM19-043 69.02 70.38 1.36 S4L

TM19-043 71.00 71.15 0.15 S4L

TM19-043 72.53 72.74 0.21 S4L

TM19-043 73.10 73.30 0.20 S4L

TM19-044 33.20 33.40 0.20 S4L

TM19-044 33.80 34.20 0.40 S4L

TM19-044 35.00 36.00 1.00 S4L

TM19-048 17.70 20.20 2.50 S4L

TM19-048LDC 16.84 16.96 0.12 S4L

TM19-048LDC 16.96 17.11 0.15 S4L

TM19-048LDC 17.11 17.93 0.82 S4L

TM19-048LDC 17.93 18.16 0.23 S4L


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-048LDC 18.16 18.23 0.07 S4L

TM19-048LDC 18.23 18.43 0.20 S4L

TM19-056 33.20 35.80 2.60 S4L

TM19-058 180.64 182.33 1.69 S4L

TM19-058 182.35 185.40 3.05 S4L

TR-TM19-009 2.00 5.50 3.50 S4L

TR-TM19-010 1.00 4.00 3.00 S4L

TR-TM19-011 0.00 0.50 0.50 S4L

TR-TM19-012 10.00 11.50 1.50 S4L

TR-TM19-013 1.50 3.70 2.20 S4L

CM7-73 71.93 74.22 2.29 S3U

TD73-3 128.46 130.00 1.54 S3U

TD73-4 216.00 217.22 1.22 S3U

TD73-4 217.22 217.70 0.48 S3U

TD73-4 217.70 218.50 0.80 S3U

TD73-5 150.69 151.07 0.38 S3U

TD73-5 151.07 151.63 0.56 S3U

TD73-5 151.63 152.01 0.38 S3U

TD73-5 152.01 152.49 0.48 S3U

TD74-10 243.79 245.49 1.70 S3U

TD74-16 245.80 246.88 1.08 S3U

TD74-19 190.42 191.74 1.32 S3U

TD74-22 147.62 148.00 0.38 S3U

TD74-32 109.51 109.81 0.30 S3U

TD74-6 254.88 256.30 1.42 S3U

TD75-34 480.98 481.40 0.42 S3U

TD75-39 78.85 80.16 1.31 S3U

TD75-41 106.54 108.14 1.60 S3U

TD75-71 48.65 49.17 0.52 S3U

TD75-73 75.56 76.32 0.76 S3U

TD75-73 77.26 78.06 0.80 S3U

TD75-73 78.06 78.72 0.66 S3U

TD76-87 204.22 204.83 0.61 S3U

TD76-98 73.46 75.12 1.66 S3U

TM18-012 113.81 115.57 1.76 S3U

TM19-016 11.60 12.40 0.80 S3U

TM19-017 67.40 67.90 0.50 S3U

TM19-019 86.40 86.90 0.50 S3U

TM19-025 76.20 77.50 1.30 S3U

TM19-030 97.10 97.80 0.70 S3U

TM19-037 129.70 130.20 0.50 S3U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-038 41.60 42.40 0.80 S3U

TM19-043 155.20 156.20 1.00 S3U

TM19-034 12.20 12.60 0.40 S3M

TM19-049 15.98 16.60 0.62 S3M

CM7-73 79.25 81.17 1.92 S3L

TD74-10 250.89 252.49 1.60 S3L

TD74-10 252.49 253.25 0.76 S3L

TD74-32 125.35 125.87 0.52 S3L

TD75-41 112.52 113.42 0.90 S3L

TD75-71 49.41 49.83 0.42 S3L

TD75-73 82.10 82.72 0.62 S3L

TD75-73 82.72 84.22 1.50 S3L

TD75-73 84.22 84.50 0.28 S3L

TM19-017 71.80 74.00 2.20 S3L

TM19-019 97.70 97.90 0.20 S3L

TM19-030 102.10 102.80 0.70 S3L

TM19-034 14.10 15.10 1.00 S3L

TM19-049 18.60 19.40 0.80 S3L

CM10-73 85.65 86.56 0.91 S2U

NB73-01 5.27 9.20 3.93 S2U

NB73-02 10.70 11.37 0.67 S2U

NB73-02 12.25 13.20 0.94 S2U

NB73-03 8.90 9.72 0.82 S2U

NB73-03 9.72 12.89 3.17 S2U

NB73-05 3.57 5.58 2.01 S2U

NB73-06 3.35 6.46 3.11 S2U

NB73-07 4.27 9.02 4.75 S2U

NB73-07 12.92 14.84 1.92 S2U

NB73-08 10.70 13.62 2.93 S2U

T73-15 24.38 24.84 0.46 S2U

T73-16 3.93 5.21 1.28 S2U

T73-16 5.85 9.88 4.02 S2U

T73-17 4.02 4.51 0.49 S2U

T73-17 6.37 9.45 3.08 S2U

T73-18 2.80 7.77 4.97 S2U

T73-18 7.77 8.84 1.07 S2U

T73-18 8.84 11.89 3.05 S2U

T73-18 11.89 12.34 0.46 S2U

T73-19 2.50 9.30 6.80 S2U

T73-19 9.30 9.66 0.37 S2U

T73-19 9.66 12.22 2.56 S2U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

T73-20 7.50 7.86 0.37 S2U

T73-20 7.86 8.63 0.76 S2U

T73-20 8.63 10.73 2.10 S2U

T73-21 5.27 7.47 2.19 S2U

T73-21 7.47 8.08 0.61 S2U

T73-21 8.08 8.29 0.21 S2U

T73-21 9.78 10.06 0.27 S2U

T73-21 10.06 11.58 1.52 S2U

T73-21 11.58 14.78 3.20 S2U

T73-21 14.78 15.24 0.46 S2U

T73-21 15.24 16.15 0.91 S2U

T73-21 16.15 16.76 0.61 S2U

T73-21 16.76 19.51 2.74 S2U

T73-21 19.51 24.08 4.57 S2U

T73-21 24.08 26.21 2.13 S2U

T73-22 5.09 16.18 11.09 S2U

T73-22 16.73 18.62 1.89 S2U

T73-22 18.99 19.42 0.43 S2U

T73-22 19.42 19.78 0.37 S2U

T73-22 19.78 23.04 3.26 S2U

T73-23 6.92 10.67 3.75 S2U

T73-23 10.67 11.58 0.91 S2U

T73-23 11.58 18.90 7.32 S2U

T73-23 18.90 19.51 0.61 S2U

T73-23 19.51 22.01 2.50 S2U

T73-23 22.59 23.01 0.43 S2U

T73-23 23.01 23.16 0.15 S2U

T75-20 38.36 39.48 1.12 S2U

T75-21 29.38 30.36 0.98 S2U

TD73-1 66.14 70.50 4.36 S2U

TD73-1 691.59 693.42 1.83 S2U

TD73-1 693.88 694.94 1.07 S2U

TD73-2 43.28 46.02 2.74 S2U

TD73-3 214.76 215.46 0.70 S2U

TD73-3 215.46 216.36 0.90 S2U

TD73-4 299.62 299.86 0.24 S2U

TD73-4 299.86 300.76 0.90 S2U

TD74-10 384.51 385.13 0.62 S2U

TD74-10 385.13 386.17 1.04 S2U

TD74-10 386.17 387.05 0.88 S2U

TD74-10 387.05 388.43 1.38 S2U


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD74-10 388.43 389.59 1.16 S2U

TD74-10 389.59 390.01 0.42 S2U

TD74-16 348.64 349.12 0.48 S2U

TD74-16 350.02 350.72 0.70 S2U

TD74-16 352.64 353.92 1.28 S2U

TD74-16 353.92 354.48 0.56 S2U

TD74-17 50.06 51.08 1.02 S2U

TD74-17 52.40 53.44 1.04 S2U

TD74-17 727.90 729.36 1.46 S2U

TD74-17 729.96 731.38 1.42 S2U

TD74-17 731.38 731.90 0.52 S2U

TD74-17 732.60 733.30 0.70 S2U

TD74-18 380.55 382.33 1.78 S2U

TD74-18 384.79 387.33 2.54 S2U

TD74-18 387.33 388.93 1.60 S2U

TD74-20 381.86 382.32 0.46 S2U

TD74-20 382.60 383.08 0.48 S2U

TD74-21 465.16 466.62 1.46 S2U

TD74-21 466.62 466.86 0.24 S2U

TD74-21 466.86 468.64 1.78 S2U

TD74-21 469.44 470.48 1.04 S2U

TD74-23 447.86 448.22 0.36 S2U

TD74-23 448.22 448.60 0.38 S2U

TD74-23 448.60 449.02 0.42 S2U

TD74-23 449.02 449.96 0.94 S2U

TD74-23 449.96 450.76 0.80 S2U

TD74-23 450.76 451.48 0.72 S2U

TD74-23 451.48 452.04 0.56 S2U

TD74-24 533.91 535.69 1.78 S2U

TD74-25 501.22 502.48 1.26 S2U

TD74-25 502.48 503.98 1.50 S2U

TD74-25 503.98 507.04 3.06 S2U

TD74-26 407.18 407.38 0.20 S2U

TD74-26 407.70 408.84 1.14 S2U

TD74-26 408.84 410.14 1.30 S2U

TD74-27 463.34 465.32 1.98 S2U

TD74-27 465.32 466.54 1.22 S2U

TD74-27 466.54 470.26 3.72 S2U

TD74-28 119.54 120.18 0.64 S2U

TD74-29 48.11 48.63 0.52 S2U

TD74-30 91.35 91.91 0.56 S2U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD74-30 92.79 93.13 0.34 S2U

TD74-30 94.25 95.43 1.18 S2U

TD74-30 95.43 96.19 0.76 S2U

TD74-32 274.03 274.69 0.66 S2U

TD74-6 335.86 336.65 0.79 S2U

TD74-6 336.65 337.94 2.59 S2U

TD74-6 337.94 338.40 0.46 S2U

TD74-9 386.55 387.49 0.94 S2U

TD74-9 388.11 388.87 0.76 S2U

TD75-34 37.70 37.94 0.24 S2U

TD75-34 566.58 566.96 0.38 S2U

TD75-34 567.44 567.66 0.22 S2U

TD75-34 569.18 569.60 0.42 S2U

TD75-34 570.06 570.30 0.24 S2U

TD75-34 571.10 571.62 0.52 S2U

TD75-35 632.70 632.98 0.28 S2U

TD75-35 633.54 634.02 0.48 S2U

TD75-35 634.02 634.76 0.74 S2U

TD75-35 634.76 637.22 2.46 S2U

TD75-36 157.25 157.95 0.70 S2U

TD75-36 226.95 227.71 0.76 S2U

TD75-36 758.74 762.63 3.90 S2U

TD75-38 91.78 92.24 0.46 S2U

TD75-38 175.50 176.30 0.80 S2U

TD75-39 178.65 179.45 0.80 S2U

TD75-39 179.45 180.15 0.70 S2U

TD75-39 180.15 181.13 0.98 S2U

TD75-43 395.65 396.45 0.80 S2U

TD75-54 155.04 155.74 0.70 S2U

TD75-54 156.30 156.90 0.60 S2U

TD75-56 197.97 198.59 0.62 S2U

TD75-58 111.50 112.68 1.18 S2U

TD75-59 84.61 85.69 1.08 S2U

TD75-59 85.69 86.91 1.22 S2U

TD75-60 133.61 134.61 1.00 S2U

TD75-61 53.98 54.56 0.58 S2U

TD75-61 54.56 55.78 1.22 S2U

TD75-62 81.34 81.72 0.38 S2U

TD75-62 81.72 82.80 1.08 S2U

TD75-62 82.80 83.50 0.70 S2U

TD75-62 83.50 84.78 1.28 S2U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD75-62 84.78 86.80 2.02 S2U

TD75-62 86.80 89.06 2.26 S2U

TD75-63 86.46 86.84 0.38 S2U

TD75-63 86.84 88.92 2.08 S2U

TD75-63 89.38 90.28 0.90 S2U

TD75-65 54.38 56.72 2.34 S2U

TD75-65 56.72 57.18 0.46 S2U

TD75-65 57.18 57.80 0.62 S2U

TD75-66 43.01 43.57 0.56 S2U

TD75-69 89.61 90.22 0.61 S2U

TD75-70 286.11 287.65 1.54 S2U

TD75-72 114.01 114.71 0.70 S2U

TD75-73 157.74 158.96 1.22 S2U

TD75-74 150.72 151.34 0.62 S2U

TD75-74 152.94 153.80 0.86 S2U

TD76-102 281.52 281.96 0.44 S2U

TD76-102 282.28 283.36 1.08 S2U

TD76-102 283.70 284.12 0.42 S2U

TD76-105 82.53 87.17 4.64 S2U

TD76-106A 313.47 313.97 0.50 S2U

TD76-106A 314.33 314.69 0.36 S2U

TD76-106A 314.69 314.87 0.18 S2U

TD76-106A 314.87 316.31 1.44 S2U

TD76-106A 316.31 316.87 0.56 S2U

TD76-106A 317.35 317.85 0.50 S2U

TD76-107 176.24 177.26 1.02 S2U

TD76-107 179.62 180.00 0.38 S2U

TD76-107 180.00 180.34 0.34 S2U

TD76-107 180.34 180.72 0.38 S2U

TD76-107 180.72 181.26 0.54 S2U

TD76-107 181.26 182.06 0.80 S2U

TD76-107 182.06 182.44 0.38 S2U

TD76-107 182.44 183.14 0.70 S2U

TD76-88 42.28 43.56 1.28 S2U

TD76-88 43.56 44.20 0.64 S2U

TD76-88 44.20 44.86 0.66 S2U

TD76-88 44.86 49.90 5.04 S2U

TD76-89 7.57 9.23 1.66 S2U

TD76-89 9.23 10.11 0.88 S2U

TD76-89 11.19 12.99 1.80 S2U

TD76-89 12.99 13.59 0.60 S2U


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD76-89 14.25 15.33 1.08 S2U

TD76-89 15.33 17.51 2.18 S2U

TD76-89 17.51 17.83 0.32 S2U

TD76-92 4.27 6.73 2.46 S2U

TD76-92 6.73 7.43 0.70 S2U

TD76-92 7.43 8.65 1.22 S2U

TD76-93 1.02 5.26 4.24 S2U

TD76-94 12.48 14.90 2.42 S2U

TD76-94 14.90 16.60 1.70 S2U

TD76-94 16.60 21.68 5.08 S2U

TD76-94 21.68 23.78 2.10 S2U

TD76-94 23.78 25.90 2.12 S2U

TD76-94 25.90 26.94 1.04 S2U

TD76-94 26.94 30.00 3.06 S2U

TD76-94 30.00 31.18 1.18 S2U

TD76-94 31.18 37.20 6.02 S2U

TD76-94 37.20 38.42 1.22 S2U

TD76-94 38.42 40.16 1.74 S2U

TD76-95 7.29 8.81 1.52 S2U

TD76-95 8.81 9.37 0.56 S2U

TD76-95 9.37 11.01 1.64 S2U

TD76-95 11.01 11.87 0.86 S2U

TD76-95 11.87 12.89 1.02 S2U

TD76-97 327.21 327.39 0.18 S2U

TD76-97 327.39 327.67 0.28 S2U

TD76-97 327.67 328.11 0.44 S2U

TD76-97 328.11 329.09 0.98 S2U

TD76-97 329.09 329.55 0.46 S2U

TD76-97 329.55 329.89 0.34 S2U

TD76-98 235.34 236.24 0.90 S2U

TD76-98 236.46 236.88 0.42 S2U

TD76-98 237.54 238.02 0.48 S2U

TD76-98 238.44 238.92 0.48 S2U

TD76-99 85.86 86.80 0.94 S2U

TD76-99 86.80 88.50 1.70 S2U

TD76-99 88.50 89.30 0.80 S2U

TD76-99 89.30 89.92 0.62 S2U

TD77-119 252.59 252.83 0.24 S2U

TD77-119 253.11 253.99 0.88 S2U

TD77-119 253.99 254.71 0.72 S2U

TD77-119 254.71 255.13 0.42 S2U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD77-119 255.13 255.51 0.38 S2U

TM18-003 74.84 76.81 1.97 S2U

TM18-014 43.70 44.35 0.65 S2U

TM19-016 93.60 94.80 1.20 S2U

TM19-016 96.40 98.00 1.60 S2U

TM19-016 98.70 99.10 0.40 S2U

TM19-019 166.30 167.50 1.20 S2U

TM19-019 167.70 168.80 1.10 S2U

TM19-025 143.70 145.40 1.70 S2U

TM19-025 145.80 146.60 0.80 S2U

TM19-025 147.20 147.80 0.60 S2U

TM19-025 148.60 149.20 0.60 S2U

TM19-026 78.60 80.00 1.40 S2U

TM19-028 60.60 62.90 2.30 S2U

TM19-028 63.30 65.30 2.00 S2U

TM19-028 65.80 66.30 0.50 S2U

TM19-028LDC 61.22 61.45 0.23 S2U

TM19-028LDC 61.45 61.54 0.09 S2U

TM19-028LDC 61.54 61.82 0.28 S2U

TM19-028LDC 61.82 61.88 0.06 S2U

TM19-028LDC 61.88 62.01 0.13 S2U

TM19-028LDC 62.01 62.26 0.25 S2U

TM19-028LDC 62.26 62.30 0.04 S2U

TM19-028LDC 62.30 62.86 0.56 S2U

TM19-028LDC 62.86 63.16 0.30 S2U

TM19-028LDC 63.16 63.33 0.17 S2U

TM19-028LDC 63.33 63.43 0.10 S2U

TM19-028LDC 63.43 64.10 0.67 S2U

TM19-028LDC 64.10 64.34 0.24 S2U

TM19-028LDC 64.34 64.54 0.20 S2U

TM19-028LDC 64.54 64.89 0.35 S2U

TM19-028LDC 64.89 65.15 0.26 S2U

TM19-028LDC 65.15 65.45 0.30 S2U

TM19-028LDC 65.45 65.67 0.22 S2U

TM19-028LDC 65.67 66.11 0.44 S2U

TM19-028LDC 66.11 66.28 0.17 S2U

TM19-028LDC 66.28 66.43 0.15 S2U

TM19-028LDC 66.43 66.54 0.11 S2U

TM19-028LDC 66.54 67.26 0.72 S2U

TM19-028LDC 67.26 67.38 0.12 S2U

TM19-028LDC 67.38 67.48 0.10 S2U

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-028LDC 67.48 67.79 0.31 S2U

TM19-029 131.70 132.20 0.50 S2U

TM19-029 132.70 133.10 0.40 S2U

TM19-029 135.20 137.00 1.80 S2U

TM19-029 137.80 138.20 0.40 S2U

TM19-029 138.40 139.20 0.80 S2U

TM19-029LDC 128.88 129.66 0.78 S2U

TM19-029LDC 129.66 129.86 0.20 S2U

TM19-029LDC 129.86 129.88 0.02 S2U

TM19-029LDC 129.88 129.94 0.06 S2U

TM19-029LDC 129.94 130.10 0.16 S2U

TM19-029LDC 130.10 130.55 0.45 S2U

TM19-029LDC 130.55 130.64 0.09 S2U

TM19-029LDC 130.64 130.82 0.18 S2U

TM19-029LDC 130.82 130.84 0.02 S2U

TM19-029LDC 130.84 130.93 0.09 S2U

TM19-029LDC 130.93 131.37 0.44 S2U

TM19-029LDC 131.37 131.40 0.03 S2U

TM19-029LDC 131.40 131.54 0.14 S2U

TM19-029LDC 131.54 131.55 0.01 S2U

TM19-029LDC 131.55 132.19 0.64 S2U

TM19-029LDC 132.19 132.29 0.10 S2U

TM19-029LDC 132.29 132.89 0.60 S2U

TM19-029LDC 132.89 132.99 0.10 S2U

TM19-029LDC 132.99 133.09 0.10 S2U

TM19-029LDC 133.09 133.38 0.29 S2U

TM19-029LDC 133.38 133.40 0.02 S2U

TM19-029LDC 133.40 133.55 0.15 S2U

TM19-029LDC 133.55 133.94 0.39 S2U

TM19-029LDC 133.94 134.21 0.27 S2U

TM19-029LDC 134.21 134.64 0.43 S2U

TM19-029LDC 134.64 134.80 0.16 S2U

TM19-029LDC 134.80 135.48 0.68 S2U

TM19-029LDC 135.48 135.49 0.01 S2U

TM19-029LDC 135.49 135.67 0.18 S2U

TM19-029LDC 135.67 135.87 0.20 S2U

TM19-029LDC 135.87 135.95 0.08 S2U

TM19-030 204.40 205.00 0.60 S2U

TM19-030 205.90 207.00 1.10 S2U

TM19-031 56.00 57.50 1.50 S2U

TM19-031 57.90 58.90 1.00 S2U


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-032 44.70 44.90 0.20 S2U

TM19-033 59.00 59.80 0.80 S2U

TM19-033 120.20 121.20 1.00 S2U

TM19-034 70.80 74.20 3.40 S2U

TM19-035 140.90 145.30 4.40 S2U

TM19-036 122.20 122.80 0.60 S2U

TM19-036 123.10 124.60 1.50 S2U

TM19-038 129.60 134.20 4.60 S2U

TM19-040 106.60 107.40 0.80 S2U

TM19-040 107.90 109.20 1.30 S2U

TM19-040 109.40 109.90 0.50 S2U

TM19-043 241.25 241.45 0.20 S2U

TM19-043 245.60 245.75 0.15 S2U

TM19-044 87.30 88.10 0.80 S2U

TM19-044 89.00 89.40 0.40 S2U

TM19-047 83.82 86.87 3.05 S2U

TM19-049 120.40 126.40 6.00 S2U

TM19-057 107.40 109.70 2.30 S2U

NB73-01 16.89 19.26 2.38 S2L

NB73-02 17.59 18.04 0.46 S2L

NB73-02 18.44 19.48 1.04 S2L

NB73-03 14.11 22.95 8.84 S2L

NB73-06 11.09 15.12 4.02 S2L

NB73-07 19.39 21.37 1.98 S2L

NB73-08 14.69 18.17 3.47 S2L

NB73-08 18.96 19.84 0.88 S2L

T73-15 24.84 27.95 3.11 S2L

T73-17 16.67 17.80 1.13 S2L

T73-17 18.23 20.94 2.71 S2L

T73-17 21.15 25.45 4.30 S2L

T73-17 25.45 25.91 0.46 S2L

T73-17 25.91 26.15 0.24 S2L

T73-17 26.15 27.13 0.98 S2L

T73-17 27.52 28.77 1.25 S2L

T73-18 12.34 19.81 7.47 S2L

T73-18 19.81 20.73 0.91 S2L

T73-18 20.73 21.21 0.49 S2L

T73-19 46.36 46.76 0.40 S2L

T73-19 47.46 50.72 3.26 S2L

T73-19 50.72 59.44 8.72 S2L

T73-19 59.44 60.05 0.61 S2L

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

T73-19 60.05 64.01 3.96 S2L

T73-19 64.01 65.53 1.52 S2L

T73-19 65.53 65.75 0.21 S2L

T73-19 66.84 74.28 7.44 S2L

T73-20 14.36 30.39 16.03 S2L

T73-21 32.40 37.28 4.88 S2L

T73-21 38.31 43.53 5.21 S2L

T73-22 24.60 32.25 7.65 S2L

T73-23 40.05 42.67 2.62 S2L

T73-23 42.67 43.59 0.91 S2L

T73-23 43.59 55.17 11.58 S2L

T73-23 55.17 56.08 0.91 S2L

T73-23 56.08 57.64 1.55 S2L

T73-23 61.39 66.14 4.75 S2L

T73-23 66.14 66.75 0.61 S2L

T73-23 66.75 67.15 0.40 S2L

T73-23 69.34 69.49 0.15 S2L

T73-23 69.49 71.93 2.44 S2L

T73-23 71.93 73.15 1.22 S2L

T73-23 73.15 74.07 0.91 S2L

T73-23 74.07 74.43 0.37 S2L

T73-23 75.47 77.11 1.65 S2L

T73-23 77.11 78.03 0.91 S2L

T73-23 78.03 82.02 3.99 S2L

T75-20 34.08 36.00 1.92 S2L

T75-21 27.26 28.34 1.08 S2L

TD73-1 695.55 696.16 0.61 S2L

TD73-1 698.60 701.00 1.37 S2L

TD73-4 303.72 304.48 0.76 S2L

TD73-4 304.48 305.56 1.08 S2L

TD73-4 305.56 306.88 1.32 S2L

TD74-10 393.89 394.27 0.38 S2L

TD74-16 360.36 361.34 0.98 S2L

TD74-17 53.96 54.80 0.84 S2L

TD74-17 54.80 55.64 0.84 S2L

TD74-17 734.38 736.22 1.84 S2L

TD74-17 736.22 737.30 1.08 S2L

TD74-18 391.17 395.03 3.86 S2L

TD74-18 395.03 396.35 1.32 S2L

TD74-20 386.84 387.16 0.32 S2L

TD74-20 388.06 389.20 1.14 S2L

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD74-21 473.40 475.14 1.74 S2L

TD74-21 475.14 477.30 2.16 S2L

TD74-23 456.84 457.40 0.56 S2L

TD74-23 457.40 458.30 0.90 S2L

TD74-23 458.30 459.42 1.12 S2L

TD74-24 538.33 539.55 1.22 S2L

TD74-24 539.55 542.09 2.54 S2L

TD74-25 507.88 511.28 3.40 S2L

TD74-26 411.70 413.06 1.36 S2L

TD74-26 413.06 414.80 1.74 S2L

TD74-28 122.44 123.04 0.60 S2L

TD74-28 123.04 123.98 0.94 S2L

TD74-29 50.45 51.35 0.90 S2L

TD74-30 98.83 99.67 0.84 S2L

TD74-32 279.49 280.29 0.80 S2L

TD74-6 342.22 342.92 0.70 S2L

TD74-9 390.09 390.89 0.80 S2L

TD75-34 39.54 41.00 1.46 S2L

TD75-34 573.12 573.36 0.24 S2L

TD75-34 574.16 574.34 0.18 S2L

TD75-34 575.14 575.76 0.62 S2L

TD75-35 639.34 640.28 0.94 S2L

TD75-35 640.28 643.00 2.72 S2L

TD75-36 167.65 168.83 1.18 S2L

TD75-36 765.88 767.54 1.66 S2L

TD75-38 93.80 94.40 0.60 S2L

TD75-38 177.32 179.26 1.94 S2L

TD75-39 182.31 183.07 0.76 S2L

TD75-39 183.07 183.95 0.88 S2L

TD75-54 162.40 162.96 0.56 S2L

TD75-54 163.44 163.96 0.52 S2L

TD75-54 164.28 164.80 0.52 S2L

TD75-54 165.38 166.78 1.40 S2L

TD75-56 200.89 202.67 1.78 S2L

TD75-58 115.00 117.48 2.48 S2L

TD75-59 87.99 88.83 0.84 S2L

TD75-59 88.83 90.25 1.42 S2L

TD75-60 136.75 142.79 6.04 S2L

TD75-61 55.78 56.08 0.30 S2L

TD75-61 56.08 57.09 1.01 S2L

TD75-62 90.70 91.96 1.26 S2L


Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD75-63 90.80 92.00 1.20 S2L

TD75-63 92.86 93.52 0.66 S2L

TD75-65 58.40 60.62 2.22 S2L

TD75-65 60.62 61.50 0.88 S2L

TD75-69 91.68 92.48 0.80 S2L

TD75-70 289.33 291.11 1.78 S2L

TD75-72 116.21 116.73 0.52 S2L

TD75-73 159.94 160.88 0.94 S2L

TD75-74 157.70 158.58 0.88 S2L

TD75-74 158.58 160.40 1.82 S2L

TD75-74 160.40 161.90 1.50 S2L

TD75-74 162.34 163.26 0.92 S2L

TD75-74 164.92 170.08 5.16 S2L

TD75-74 171.12 173.78 2.66 S2L

TD76-102 285.26 286.12 0.86 S2L

TD76-102 286.72 287.20 0.48 S2L

TD76-102 287.80 289.42 1.62 S2L

TD76-105 105.21 106.81 1.60 S2L

TD76-106A 318.63 318.89 0.26 S2L

TD76-106A 318.89 319.35 0.46 S2L

TD76-106A 319.35 319.77 0.42 S2L

TD76-106A 319.77 321.49 1.72 S2L

TD76-106A 321.49 322.53 1.04 S2L

TD76-106A 322.53 322.81 0.28 S2L

TD76-107 185.08 185.54 0.46 S2L

TD76-107 185.90 186.26 0.36 S2L

TD76-107 187.04 188.20 1.16 S2L

TD76-107 188.20 188.98 0.78 S2L

TD76-107 188.98 189.64 0.66 S2L

TD76-107 189.64 190.14 0.50 S2L

TD76-89 20.61 26.61 6.00 S2L

TD76-89 26.61 27.19 0.58 S2L

TD76-89 27.19 29.29 2.10 S2L

TD76-89 29.29 30.81 1.52 S2L

TD76-89 30.81 32.27 1.46 S2L

TD76-89 32.27 33.25 0.98 S2L

TD76-89 33.25 34.99 1.74 S2L

TD76-89 34.99 36.83 1.84 S2L

TD76-89 39.41 40.39 0.98 S2L

TD76-89 40.39 42.13 1.74 S2L

TD76-89 43.29 43.95 0.66 S2L

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TD76-89 43.95 46.77 2.82 S2L

TD76-94 41.20 42.70 1.50 S2L

TD76-97 333.03 333.27 0.24 S2L

TD76-97 334.07 335.39 1.32 S2L

TD76-98 239.90 240.84 0.94 S2L

TD76-98 240.84 243.28 2.44 S2L

TD76-99 90.80 91.08 0.28 S2L

TD77-119 257.57 258.09 0.52 S2L

TD77-119 258.65 259.27 0.62 S2L

TD77-119 259.27 259.97 0.70 S2L

TD77-119 259.97 261.25 1.28 S2L

TD77-119 261.25 261.61 0.36 S2L

TM18-014 45.85 46.85 1.00 S2L

TM19-016 103.30 106.40 3.10 S2L

TM19-019 170.50 171.00 0.50 S2L

TM19-019 171.00 172.20 1.20 S2L

TM19-025 150.60 151.60 1.00 S2L

TM19-026 82.10 85.30 3.20 S2L

TM19-028 68.00 72.60 4.60 S2L

TM19-028LDC 70.73 71.15 0.42 S2L

TM19-028LDC 71.15 71.52 0.37 S2L

TM19-028LDC 71.52 71.82 0.30 S2L

TM19-028LDC 71.82 71.96 0.14 S2L

TM19-028LDC 71.96 72.21 0.25 S2L

TM19-028LDC 72.21 73.47 1.26 S2L

TM19-028LDC 73.47 73.66 0.19 S2L

TM19-028LDC 73.66 73.81 0.15 S2L

TM19-028LDC 73.81 73.82 0.01 S2L

TM19-028LDC 73.82 74.06 0.24 S2L

TM19-028LDC 74.06 74.24 0.18 S2L

TM19-028LDC 74.24 74.41 0.17 S2L

TM19-028LDC 74.41 74.54 0.13 S2L

TM19-028LDC 74.54 74.96 0.42 S2L

TM19-028LDC 74.96 75.10 0.14 S2L

TM19-028LDC 75.10 75.31 0.21 S2L

TM19-028LDC 75.31 75.55 0.24 S2L

TM19-028LDC 75.55 75.86 0.31 S2L

TM19-028LDC 75.86 76.09 0.23 S2L

TM19-028LDC 76.09 76.41 0.32 S2L

TM19-028LDC 76.41 76.77 0.36 S2L

TM19-028LDC 76.77 77.12 0.35 S2L

Hole ID From

(m)

To

(m)

Length

(m)

Seam

ID

TM19-028LDC 77.12 77.46 0.34 S2L

TM19-028LDC 77.46 77.66 0.20 S2L

TM19-028LDC 77.66 77.89 0.23 S2L

TM19-028LDC 77.89 78.25 0.36 S2L

TM19-029 142.20 142.80 0.60 S2L

TM19-029 143.40 144.10 0.70 S2L

TM19-029 144.40 145.70 1.30 S2L

TM19-029 146.00 147.50 1.50 S2L

TM19-029 147.90 148.10 0.20 S2L

TM19-029LDC 139.75 140.00 0.25 S2L

TM19-029LDC 140.00 140.20 0.20 S2L

TM19-029LDC 140.20 140.47 0.27 S2L

TM19-029LDC 140.47 140.83 0.36 S2L

TM19-029LDC 140.83 141.37 0.54 S2L

TM19-029LDC 141.37 141.84 0.47 S2L

TM19-029LDC 141.84 142.14 0.30 S2L

TM19-029LDC 142.14 142.21 0.07 S2L

TM19-029LDC 142.21 142.51 0.30 S2L

TM19-029LDC 142.51 143.21 0.70 S2L

TM19-029LDC 143.21 143.91 0.70 S2L

TM19-029LDC 143.91 144.34 0.43 S2L

TM19-029LDC 144.34 144.56 0.22 S2L

TM19-029LDC 144.56 144.73 0.17 S2L

TM19-029LDC 144.73 145.38 0.65 S2L

TM19-029LDC 145.38 145.58 0.20 S2L

TM19-029LDC 145.58 145.74 0.16 S2L

TM19-029LDC 145.74 145.97 0.23 S2L

TM19-030 208.40 208.80 0.40 S2L

TM19-031 59.60 61.00 1.40 S2L

TM19-031 61.30 63.50 2.20 S2L

TM19-032 45.30 47.50 2.20 S2L

TM19-033 61.00 62.10 1.10 S2L

TM19-033 63.00 64.80 1.80 S2L

TM19-033 121.50 123.40 1.90 S2L

TM19-035 145.70 146.60 0.90 S2L

TM19-036 125.50 126.00 0.50 S2L

TM19-038 136.70 137.70 1.00 S2L

TM19-040 111.00 111.40 0.40 S2L

TM19-043 251.78 252.12 0.34 S2L

TM19-043 254.20 254.55 0.35 S2L

TM19-043 254.75 254.80 0.05 S2L


TM19-043 255.90 256.00 0.10 S2L TM19-044 90.50 91.10 0.60 S2L TM19-057 110.30 113.30 3.00 S2L

Table 11-2 Included Drillholes

Year Hole ID Reliability Hole Type Easting Northing Elevation Az Dip Depth (m) Collar SurveyDeviation

SurveyGeophysics

Coal

QualityCompany

1973 CM10-73 3 RC 666436 5490930 2062 0 -90 146.31 Map NO NO NO Manalta Coal Ltd.











1973 NB73-01 2 RC 664886 5494761 1500 0 -90 27.44 Map NO NO NO Coleman Collieries Ltd.










1973 T73-15 3 RAB 666540 5490718 2042 0 -90 30.48 Map NO NO NO Coleman Collieries Ltd.









1975 T75-13 2 RAB 665977 5493773 1845 0 -90 55.33 Map NO YES NO Coleman Collieries Ltd.


















SurveyGeophysics

Coal

QualityCompany










1973 TD73-1 2 DD 666268 5492305 2016 0 -90 723.9 Map NO YES YES Coleman Collieries Ltd.

1973 TD73-2 2 DD 666262 5492291 2016 90 -45 255.06 Map NO YES NO Coleman Collieries Ltd.







1974 TD74-18 2 DD 666396 5492532 1923 0 -90 401.47 Map NO NO NO Coleman Collieries Ltd.































SurveyGeophysics

Coal

QualityCompany






1975 TD75-50 2 DD 666091 5493374 1816 270 -75 131.98 Map NO NO YES Coleman Collieries Ltd.











1975 TD75-61 2 DD 665154 5493349 1674 90 -50 100.28 Map NO NO YES Coleman Collieries Ltd.




























1976 TD76-106A 2 DD 666809 5489465 1688 75 -66 387.1 Map NO YES NO Coleman Collieries Ltd.




SurveyGeophysics

Coal

QualityCompany

1976 TD76-113 2 DD 666801 5489762 1749 90 -60 8 Map NO NO NO Coleman Collieries Ltd.












1976 TD76-96 2 DD 667018 5490796 1999 90 -73 40 Map NO YES NO Coleman Collieries Ltd.






2018 TM18-001 1 DD 665544 5494159 1677 248 -50 82.95 Topcon GR-5 RTK YES YES NO Montem Resources

2018 TM18-002 1 RAB 665547 5494353 1636 0 -90 60 Topcon GR-5 RTK YES YES NO Montem Resources



2018 TM18-004LDC 1 RAB-LDC 665677 5494084 1713 0 -90 80.2 Topcon GR-5 RTK NO NO YES Montem Resources



2018 TM18-007 3 RAB 665895 5492667 1894 0 -90 27 Topcon GR-5 RTK NO NO NO Montem Resources




2018 TM18-011 2 RAB 666048 5492706 1866 0 -90 111.25 Topcon GR-5 RTK NO NO NO Montem Resources


2018 TM18-012LDC 1 LDC 665995 5493757 1845 0 -90 56.33 Topcon GR-5 RTK YES NO YES Montem Resources


2018 TM18-013LDCA 1 LDC 666406 5492706 1913 0 -90 51.48 Topcon GR-5 RTK NO NO YES Montem Resources

2018 TM18-013LDCB 1 LDC 666407 5492707 1913 0 -90 47.32 Topcon GR-5 RTK NO NO NO Montem Resources



2019 TM19-016 1 RAB 666129 5494023 1769 0 -90 121.92 Topcon GR-5 RTK YES YES NO Montem Resources





2019 TM19-020LDC 1 LDC 666702 5491837 1874 0 -90 111.5 Topcon GR-5 RTK YES YES YES Montem Resources






SurveyGeophysics

Coal

QualityCompany


2019 TM19-024 2 RAB 666457 5492373 1894 0 -90 67.1 Topcon GR-5 RTK NO YES NO Montem Resources






2019 TM19-027LDCB 1 LDC 666605 5491793 1918 0 -90 100.36 Topcon GR-5 RTK YES YES YES Montem Resources


2019 TM19-028LDC 1 LDC 666886 5491658 1850 0 -90 82.78 Topcon GR-5 RTK YES YES NO Montem Resources









2019 TM19-035LDC 1 LDC 666234 5492119 2057 0 -90 84.31 Topcon GR-5 RTK YES YES NO Montem Resources











2019 TM19-045 1 RC 666448 5492323 1898 0 -90 45 Topcon GR-5 RTK YES YES NO Montem Resources


2019 TM19-045LDCB 1 LDC 666450 5492316 1898 0 -90 36.98 Topcon GR-5 RTK YES YES YES Montem Resources











2019 TM19-053 1 DD 665882 5492682 1891 210 65 200.72 Topcon GR-5 RTK YES YES NO Montem Resources






SurveyGeophysics

Coal

QualityCompany



Table 11-3 Excluded Drillholes

Year Hole ID ReliabilityHole

TypeEasting Northing Elevation Az Dip Depth (m)

Collar

Survey

Deviation

SurveyGeophysics

Coal

QualityCompany

1981 RDH-MM-1 3 RC 668960 5488356 1685 0 -90 118 Map NO YES NO Shell Canada Resources Ltd.




1972 T72-1 3 RC 666101 5493431 NA NA NA NA Map NO NO NO NA



1975 T75-19 3 RC 665963 5491613 2198 90 -30 184.41 Map NO NO NO Coleman Collieries Ltd.

1972 TD72-2 3 DD 666262 5492291 NA NA NA NA Map NO NO NO NA







1974 TD74-11 3 DD 666380 5491146 NA NA NA NA Map NO NO YES Coleman Collieries Ltd.

1974 TD74-12 3 DD 666469 5490836 NA NA NA NA Map NO NO YES Coleman Collieries Ltd.

1974 TD74-13 3 DD 666413 5490978 NA NA NA NA Map NO NO NO Coleman Collieries Ltd.



1974 TD74-4 3 DD 666034 5493728 1847 90 -52 NA Map NO NO NO Coleman Collieries Ltd.

1974 TD74-5 3 DD 666034 5493728 1847 270 -50 NA Map NO NO NO Coleman Collieries Ltd.

1975 TD75-35A 3 DD 666595 5491340 2025 NA NA NA Map NO YES NO Coleman Collieries Ltd.

1976 TD76-103 3 NA 666446 5489135 1541 0 -90 NA Map NO NO NO Coleman Collieries Ltd.


1976 TD76-107A 3 DD 666915 5489281 1678 78 -60 18.59 Map NO YES NO Coleman Collieries Ltd.

1976 TD76-91A 3 DD 666720 5491267 1986 0 -90 NA Map NO NO NO Coleman Collieries Ltd.

NA TM1 3 NA 665641 5494110 1698 0 -90 110.04 Map NO NO NO Coleman Collieries Ltd.

NA TM13-01 3 NA 663715 5491962 1581 85 -70 NA Map NO NO NO NA








Table 12-1 - Raw Coal Quality Grid Data

Hole_IDFrom

(m)To (m)

Length

(m)Litho

Seam

DGCSample Number ARD

Ash

%_adAsh %_d

Ash

%_IS

5%_M

IS

CSN

CV

kcal_kg

ad

CV

kcal_kg

d

CV

kcal_kg

daf

CV

MJ_kg

ad

CV

MJ_kg

d

CV MJ

kg daf

FC %

ad

IM

%

ad

RD ad RD d

RD

IS_5_

%

MIS

TS %

ad

TS %

d

TS %

daf

Vol %

ad

Vol %

d

Vol %

dafComments

TD73-1 434.34 436.47 2.13 COAL S5U TD73-1_002 33.8 32.5 43.1 1.2 1.59 1.55 21.8 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD73-1 436.47 436.78 0.31 MDSTC UNK TD73-1_002 33.8 32.5 43.1 1.2 1.59 1.55 21.8 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD73-1 436.78 443.48 6.7 COAL S5M TD73-1_002 33.8 32.5 43.1 1.2 1.59 1.55 21.8 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD73-3 61.08 62.66 1.58 COAL S4U TD73-3_001 20.4 19.6 55 1.2 1.46 1.43 23.3 Global IM Value

TD73-3 62.66 63.42 0.76 SHC S4U TD73-3_001 20.4 19.6 55 1.2 1.46 1.43 23.3 Global IM Value

TD73-3 63.42 64.6 1.18 DRTC S4U TD73-3_001 20.4 19.6 55 1.2 1.46 1.43 23.3 Global IM Value

TD73-3 64.6 66 1.4 COAL S4U TD73-3_001 20.4 19.6 55 1.2 1.46 1.43 23.3 Global IM Value





TD73-4 101.78 103.33 1.55 COAL S4L TD73-4_001 28.4 27.3 44.9 1.2 1.53 1.5 27.1 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD74-10 173.75 175.11 1.36 DRTC S4U TD74-10_005 22.5 21.6 55.2 1.2 1.47 1.45 21.2 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint


TD74-10 176.33 176.61 0.28 SHC S4U TD74-10_006 24.4 23.5 54.1 1.2 1.49 1.46 20.9 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint


TD74-16 156.54 159.5 2.96 COAL S4M TD74-16_005 21 20.2 56.6 1.2 1.46 1.44 22 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD74-16 159.5 161.06 1.56 SHC S4M TD74-16_005 21 20.2 56.6 1.2 1.46 1.44 22 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD74-16 161.06 163.78 2.72 DRTC S4M TD74-16_006 22 21.2 55.6 1.2 1.47 1.44 21.8 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD74-16 163.78 164.34 0.56 SHC S4M TD74-16_006 22 21.2 55.6 1.2 1.47 1.44 21.8 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint


TD74-17 499.98 500.5 0.52 SHC S5L TD74-17_010 36.1 34.7 43.3 1.2 1.61 1.58 20 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD74-17 500.5 501.62 1.12 DRTC S5L TD74-17_010 36.1 34.7 43.3 1.2 1.61 1.58 20 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD74-17 501.62 503.04 1.42 COAL S5L TD74-17_010 36.1 34.7 43.3 1.2 1.61 1.58 20 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD74-17 503.04 504.16 1.12 SHC S5L TD74-17_010 36.1 34.7 43.3 1.2 1.61 1.58 20 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD74-17 551.28 551.66 0.38 SHC S4M TD74-17_012 22.1 21.3 54.8 1.2 1.47 1.45 22.6 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD74-17 551.66 553.92 2.26 DRTC S4M TD74-17_012 22.1 21.3 54.8 1.2 1.47 1.45 22.6 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint


TD74-17 727.9 729.36 1.46 DRTC S2U TD74-17_013 30 28.8 50.1 1.2 1.55 1.52 19.2 Global IM Value

TD74-17 729.36 729.96 0.6 CSLTST S2U TD74-17_013 30 28.8 50.1 1.2 1.55 1.52 19.2 Global IM Value

TD74-17 729.96 731.38 1.42 COAL S2U TD74-17_013 30 28.8 50.1 1.2 1.55 1.52 19.2 Global IM Value


TD74-17 731.9 732.6 0.7 SHC S2U TD74-17_013 30 28.8 50.1 1.2 1.55 1.52 19.2 Global IM Value


TD74-6 189.28 191.4 2.12 DRTC S4U TD74-6_007 22.2 21.3 56.1 1.2 1.47 1.45 21.6 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD74-6 191.4 191.9 0.5 SHC UNK TD74-6_007 22.2 21.3 56.1 1.2 1.47 1.45 21.6 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint



TD74-6 194.7 195.16 0.46 DRTC S4L TD74-6_008 27.8 26.7 51.2 1.2 1.52 1.49 20.4 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD74-6 195.16 196.2 1.04 SHC S4L TD74-6_008 27.8 26.7 51.2 1.2 1.52 1.49 20.4 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint






TD74-9 62.33 63.11 0.78 SHC S5U TD74-9_002 25.3 24.3 51 1.2 1.5 1.47 23.8 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD74-9 63.11 64.45 1.34 COAL S5U TD74-9_002 25.3 24.3 51 1.2 1.5 1.47 23.8 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD74-9 64.45 65.07 0.62 COAL S5U TD74-9_002 25.3 24.3 51 1.2 1.5 1.47 23.8 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD74-9 65.07 65.45 0.38 DRTC S5U TD74-9_002 25.3 24.3 51 1.2 1.5 1.47 23.8 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD74-9 65.45 65.95 0.5 SHC S5U TD74-9_003 16 15.4 55.7 1.2 1.42 1.4 26.7 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD74-9 65.95 68.79 2.84 COAL S5U TD74-9_003 16 15.4 55.7 1.2 1.42 1.4 26.7 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD74-9 104.77 106.03 1.26 COAL S5M TD74-9_005 23.9 23 49.4 1.2 1.49 1.46 25.6 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint






TD74-9 166.39 166.71 0.32 DRTC S4M TD74-9_010 24.5 23.6 51.4 1.2 1.49 1.47 23.8 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint


TD74-9 169.39 169.39 0 COAL S4L TD74-9_010 24.5 23.6 51.4 1.2 1.49 1.47 23.8 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD75-34 206.04 207.74 1.7 SLTST UNK TD75-34_002 33.3 32 43.5 1.2 1.58 1.55 22.4 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD75-34 207.74 210.01 2.27 COAL S7 TD75-34_002 33.3 32 43.5 1.2 1.58 1.55 22.4 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD75-34 210.01 212.73 2.72 COAL S7 TD75-34_003 13.7 13.2 57.1 1.2 1.4 1.38 29 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

Hole_IDFrom

(m)To (m)

Length

(m)Litho

Seam


Ash

%_adAsh %_d

Ash

%_IS

5%_M

IS

CSN

CV

kcal_kg

ad

CV

kcal_kg

d

CV

kcal_kg

daf

CV

MJ_kg

ad

CV

MJ_kg

d

CV MJ

kg daf

FC %

ad

IM

%

ad

RD ad RD d

RD

IS_5_

%

MIS

TS %

ad

TS %

d

TS %

daf

Vol %

ad

Vol %

d

Vol %

dafComments

TD75-34 212.73 213.1 0.37 SHC S7 TD75-34_003 13.7 13.2 57.1 1.2 1.4 1.38 29 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD75-34 213.1 213.8 0.7 CSLTST UNK TD75-34_003 13.7 13.2 57.1 1.2 1.4 1.38 29 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD75-34 213.8 213.96 0.16 DRTC UNK TD75-34_003 13.7 13.2 57.1 1.2 1.4 1.38 29 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD75-35 471.1 472.18 1.08 CSLTST UNK TD75-35_006 32.9 31.6 45.9 1.2 1.58 1.54 20.3 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint




TD75-36 573.34 576.67 3.32 COAL S5M TD75-36_004 30.4 29.2 43 1.2 1.55 1.52 26 Global IM Value

TD75-36 576.67 578.26 1.59 MDST UNK TD75-36_004 30.4 29.2 43 1.2 1.55 1.52 26 Global IM Value

TD75-36 578.26 583.94 5.68 COAL S5L TD75-36_004 30.4 29.2 43 1.2 1.55 1.52 26 Global IM Value

TD75-43 56.81 58.73 1.92 COAL S6U TD75-43_002 12.5 12 1.2 1.4 1.37 Global IM Value

TD75-43 58.73 59.15 0.42 CSLTST UNK TD75-43_002 12.5 12 1.2 1.4 1.37 Global IM Value

TD75-43 59.15 60.05 0.9 SLTST UNK TD75-43_002 12.5 12 1.2 1.4 1.37 Global IM Value

TD75-43 60.05 60.39 0.34 SHC S6M TD75-43_002 12.5 12 1.2 1.4 1.37 Global IM Value

TD75-43 60.39 69.27 8.88 COAL S6M TD75-43_002 12.5 12 1.2 1.4 1.37 Global IM Value

TD75-43 69.27 70.39 1.12 DRTC S6L TD75-43_002 12.5 12 1.2 1.4 1.37 Global IM Value

TD75-43 70.39 72.05 1.66 COAL S6L TD75-43_002 12.5 12 1.2 1.4 1.37 Global IM Value

TD75-47 47.58 47.9 0.32 CSLTST UNK TD75-47_001 24.9 23.9 1.2 1.5 1.47 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD75-47 47.9 49.18 1.28 CMDST UNK TD75-47_001 24.9 23.9 1.2 1.5 1.47 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD75-47 49.18 52.12 2.94 COAL S5U TD75-47_001 24.9 23.9 1.2 1.5 1.47 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD75-47 52.12 53.5 1.38 SHC UNK TD75-47_001 24.9 23.9 1.2 1.5 1.47 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD75-47 53.5 54.9 1.4 DRTC S5M TD75-47_001 24.9 23.9 1.2 1.5 1.47 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD75-47 54.9 57.3 2.4 COAL S5M TD75-47_001 24.9 23.9 1.2 1.5 1.47 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint



TD75-47 59.37 60.47 1.1 CMDST UNK TD75-47_001 24.9 23.9 1.2 1.5 1.47 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint






TD75-48 56.08 57 0.92 SHC S5M TD75-48_001 19.9 19.1 1.2 1.45 1.43 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD75-48 57 58.22 1.22 COAL S5M TD75-48_001 19.9 19.1 1.2 1.45 1.43 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint



TD75-48 59.44 60.12 0.68 SHC S5M TD75-48_001 19.9 19.1 1.2 1.45 1.43 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint








TD75-48 64.62 65.23 0.61 CSH UNK TD75-48_001 19.9 19.1 1.2 1.45 1.43 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD75-48 65.23 65.84 0.61 SHC S5L TD75-48_001 19.9 19.1 1.2 1.45 1.43 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD75-48 65.84 66.45 0.61 COAL S5L TD75-48_001 19.9 19.1 1.2 1.45 1.43 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint











TD75-49 258.17 258.56 0.39 CMDST UNK TD75-49_003 37.8 36.3 1.2 1.63 1.6 Global IM Value

TD75-49 258.56 259 0.44 SHC S5L TD75-49_003 37.8 36.3 1.2 1.63 1.6 Global IM Value

TD75-49 259 260.16 1.16 COAL S5L TD75-49_003 37.8 36.3 1.2 1.63 1.6 Global IM Value

TD75-49 260.16 261.42 1.26 DRTC S5L TD75-49_003 37.8 36.3 1.2 1.63 1.6 Global IM Value

TD75-49 261.42 262.66 1.24 COAL S5L TD75-49_003 37.8 36.3 1.2 1.63 1.6 Global IM Value

TD75-49 262.66 263.64 0.98 SHSL S5L TD75-49_003 37.8 36.3 1.2 1.63 1.6 Global IM Value

TD75-49 263.64 264.44 0.8 CMDST S5L TD75-49_003 37.8 36.3 1.2 1.63 1.6 Global IM Value


Hole_IDFrom

(m)To (m)

Length

(m)Litho

Seam


Ash

%_adAsh %_d

Ash

%_IS

5%_M

IS

CSN

CV

kcal_kg

ad

CV

kcal_kg

d

CV

kcal_kg

daf

CV

MJ_kg

ad

CV

MJ_kg

d

CV MJ

kg daf

FC %

ad

IM

%

ad

RD ad RD d

RD

IS_5_

%

MIS

TS %

ad

TS %

d

TS %

daf

Vol %

ad

Vol %

d

Vol %

dafComments



TD75-50 47.24 47.85 0.61 CSH UNK TD75-50_001 25.2 24.2 1.2 1.5 1.47 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint











TD75-50 117.74 118.87 1.13 COAL S4U TD75-50_002 18 17.3 1.2 1.44 1.41 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint

TD75-50 118.87 120.09 1.22 SHC S4U TD75-50_002 18 17.3 1.2 1.44 1.41 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint




TD75-52 40.81 44.81 4 COAL S4U TD75-52_001 20.7 19.9 1.2 1.46 1.43 Global IM Value

TD75-57 70.02 71.1 1.08 SHC S5U TD75-57_001 19.2 18.5 1.2 1.45 1.42 Global IM Value

TD75-57 71.1 72.52 1.42 CSLTST S5U TD75-57_001 19.2 18.5 1.2 1.45 1.42 Global IM Value

TD75-57 72.52 73.16 0.64 SLTST S5U TD75-57_001 19.2 18.5 1.2 1.45 1.42 Global IM Value


TD75-57 73.84 74.88 1.04 COAL S5U TD75-57_001 19.2 18.5 1.2 1.45 1.42 Global IM Value


TD75-57 76.54 76.9 0.36 DRTC S5U TD75-57_001 19.2 18.5 1.2 1.45 1.42 Global IM Value








TD75-57 114.44 115.02 0.58 CSLTST UNK TD75-57_005 14.1 13.6 1.2 1.41 1.39 Global IM Value


TD75-57 116.42 117.02 0.6 SHC S5L TD75-57_005 14.1 13.6 1.2 1.41 1.39 Global IM Value




TD75-57 125.46 126.46 1 CSLTST UNK TD75-57_005 14.1 13.6 1.2 1.41 1.39 Global IM Value









TD75-63 90.28 90.8 0.52 SHC UNK TD75-63_001 18.1 17.4 1.2 1.44 1.41 Global IM Value

TD75-63 90.8 92 1.2 COAL S2L TD75-63_001 18.1 17.4 1.2 1.44 1.41 Global IM Value


TD75-74 151.34 152.94 1.6 CSLTST S2U TD75-74_001 34.6 33.3 1.2 1.6 1.56 Global IM Value





TD75-74 161.9 162.34 0.44 CSLTST S2L TD75-74_002 29.7 28.6 1.2 1.54 1.51 Global IM Value








Hole_IDFrom

(m)To (m)

Length

(m)Litho

Seam


Ash

%_adAsh %_d

Ash

%_IS

5%_M

IS

CSN

CV

kcal_kg

ad

CV

kcal_kg

d

CV

kcal_kg

daf

CV

MJ_kg

ad

CV

MJ_kg

d

CV MJ

kg daf

FC %

ad

IM

%

ad

RD ad RD d

RD

IS_5_

%

MIS

TS %

ad

TS %

d

TS %

daf

Vol %

ad

Vol %

d

Vol %

dafComments





TD75-81 96.28 96.56 0.28 CSLTST UNK TD75-81_001 29.6 28.5 1.2 1.54 1.51 Global IM Value

TD75-81 96.56 96.92 0.36 SHC S4M TD75-81_001 29.6 28.5 1.2 1.54 1.51 Global IM Value

TD75-81 96.92 97.5 0.58 CSLTST S4M TD75-81_001 29.6 28.5 1.2 1.54 1.51 Global IM Value


TD75-81 98.2 98.88 0.68 CSLTST S4M TD75-81_001 29.6 28.5 1.2 1.54 1.51 Global IM Value

TD75-81 98.88 99.88 1 COAL S4M TD75-81_001 29.6 28.5 1.2 1.54 1.51 Global IM Value








TD75-82 96.48 96.95 0.48 MDST UNK TD75-82_001 24.4 23.5 1.2 1.49 1.46 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint


TD75-82 101.09 102.63 1.53 MDST UNK TD75-82_001 24.4 23.5 1.2 1.49 1.46 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint




TD76-85 66.12 68.28 2.16 COAL S6M TD76-85_001 15.3 14.7 1.2 1.42 1.39 Global IM Value








TD76-91 273.59 275.47 1.88 SLTST S5U TD76-91_003 29.3 28.2 1.2 1.54 1.51 Global IM Value


TD76-91 276.05 278.11 2.06 SHSL UNK TD76-91_003 29.3 28.2 1.2 1.54 1.51 Global IM Value

TD76-91 278.11 280.05 1.94 COAL S5M TD76-91_003 29.3 28.2 1.2 1.54 1.51 Global IM Value

TD76-91 280.05 281.27 1.22 DRTC S5M TD76-91_003 29.3 28.2 1.2 1.54 1.51 Global IM Value


TD76-91 282.35 283.01 0.66 DRTC S5M TD76-91_003 29.3 28.2 1.2 1.54 1.51 Global IM Value


TD76-91 283.57 284.99 1.42 SHSL UNK TD76-91_003 29.3 28.2 1.2 1.54 1.51 Global IM Value





TD76-91 286.81 287.81 1 COAL S5L TD76-91_003 29.3 28.2 1.2 1.54 1.51 Global IM Value








TD76-94 14.33 14.9 0.57 COAL S2U TD76-94_001 11.7 11.3 1.2 1.39 1.37 0.43 25.2 Global IM Value

TD76-94 14.9 16.6 1.7 DRTC S2U TD76-94_001 11.7 11.3 1.2 1.39 1.37 0.43 25.2 Global IM Value







TD76-94 26.94 30 3.06 COAL S2U TD76-94_003 10.8 10.4 1.2 1.38 1.36 0.34 24.4 Global IM Value

TD76-94 30 31.18 1.18 DRTC S2U TD76-94_003 10.8 10.4 1.2 1.38 1.36 0.34 24.4 Global IM Value



Hole_IDFrom

(m)To (m)

Length

(m)Litho

Seam


Ash

%_adAsh %_d

Ash

%_IS

5%_M

IS

CSN

CV

kcal_kg

ad

CV

kcal_kg

d

CV

kcal_kg

daf

CV

MJ_kg

ad

CV

MJ_kg

d

CV MJ

kg daf

FC %

ad

IM

%

ad

RD ad RD d

RD

IS_5_

%

MIS

TS %

ad

TS %

d

TS %

daf

Vol %

ad

Vol %

d

Vol %

dafComments









TD76-98 36.88 37.64 0.76 SHC S4M TD76-98_001 37.5 36.1 1.2 1.63 1.59 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint




TD76-98 50.2 50.72 0.52 CSLTST S4L TD76-98_002 34.1 32.8 1.2 1.59 1.56 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint


TD76-98 51.22 51.88 0.66 DRTC S4L TD76-98_002 34.1 32.8 1.2 1.59 1.56 Global IM Value; Mylec Wash Datapoint









TM18-004LDC 63.14 64 0.86 COAL S4U TM004-002_1 1.63 26.2 26.4 25 2 5915 5946 8074 24.76 24.89 33.8 52.9 0.5 1.56 1.56 1.56 0.44 0.44 0.6 20.4 20.5 27.8

TM18-004LDC 64 64.86 0.86 COAL S4U TM004-002_2 1.34 5.2 5.3 5 4.5 7972 8038 8486 33.38 33.65 35.53 69.4 0.8 1.32 1.32 1.32 0.66 0.67 0.7 24.6 24.8 26.1

TM18-004LDC 65.86 67.86 2 COAL S4U TM004-003_1-3 1.41 21.4 21.6 20.5 2.5 6401 6442 8215 26.8 26.97 34.39 55.9 0.6 1.48 1.48 1.48 0.43 0.43 0.55 22 22.1 28.2

TM18-004LDC 67.86 68.4 0.54 COAL S4U TM004-003_4 1.67 39.4 39.7 37.7 3.5 4595 4625 7666 19.24 19.36 32.1 38.6 0.6 1.69 1.7 1.68 0.34 0.34 0.57 21.3 21.4 35.6 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM18-004LDC 75.18 75.93 0.75 COAL S4L TM004-008_1-5 1.44 19.5 19.8 18.8 1.5 6537 6630 8263 27.37 27.76 34.6 59 1.4 1.47 1.48 1.46 0.36 0.37 0.46 20.2 20.4 25.5 Mylec Wash Datapoint




TM18-004LDC 77.5 78 0.5 COAL S4L TM004-008_1-5 1.44 19.5 19.8 18.8 1.5 6537 6630 8263 27.37 27.76 34.6 59 1.4 1.47 1.48 1.46 0.36 0.37 0.46 20.2 20.4 25.5 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM18-004LDC 78 78.68 0.68 COAL S4L TM004-008_5 1.71 43.6 44.1 41.8 1.5 4412 4457 7970 18.47 18.66 33.37 39.4 1 1.75 1.76 1.74 0.27 0.27 0.49 15.9 16.1 28.8 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM18-012LDC 51.6 51.63 0.03 COAL S4U TM0012-002 1.44 22.8 23 21.9 3 6242 6307 8194 26.13 26.41 34.31 52.6 1 1.49 1.5 1.48 0.42 0.42 0.55 23.5 23.8 30.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM18-012LDC 51.63 51.97 0.34 COAL S4U TM0012-002 1.44 22.8 23 21.9 3 6242 6307 8194 26.13 26.41 34.31 52.6 1 1.49 1.5 1.48 0.42 0.42 0.55 23.5 23.8 30.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM18-012LDC 51.97 52.02 0.05 MDST UNK TM0012-002 1.44 22.8 23 21.9 3 6242 6307 8194 26.13 26.41 34.31 52.6 1 1.49 1.5 1.48 0.42 0.42 0.55 23.5 23.8 30.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM18-012LDC 52.02 52.39 0.37 COAL S4M TM0012-002 1.44 22.8 23 21.9 3 6242 6307 8194 26.13 26.41 34.31 52.6 1 1.49 1.5 1.48 0.42 0.42 0.55 23.5 23.8 30.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM18-012LDC 52.39 52.55 0.16 COAL S4M TM0012-002 1.44 22.8 23 21.9 3 6242 6307 8194 26.13 26.41 34.31 52.6 1 1.49 1.5 1.48 0.42 0.42 0.55 23.5 23.8 30.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM18-012LDC 52.55 53.29 0.74 NR UNK TM0012-002 1.44 22.8 23 21.9 3 6242 6307 8194 26.13 26.41 34.31 52.6 1 1.49 1.5 1.48 0.42 0.42 0.55 23.5 23.8 30.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM18-012LDC 53.29 53.48 0.19 COAL S4L TM0012-002 1.44 22.8 23 21.9 3 6242 6307 8194 26.13 26.41 34.31 52.6 1 1.49 1.5 1.48 0.42 0.42 0.55 23.5 23.8 30.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint




TM18-012LDC 55.41 55.51 0.1 MDST UNK TM0012-003 2.44 88.2 88.9 84.5 -99 415 418 3769 1.74 1.75 15.78 4.8 0.8 2.46 2.49 2.43 0.07 0.07 0.67 6.3 6.3 56.8

TM18-013LDCA 44 45.4 1.4 COAL S5U TM0013-001 1.42 21.2 21.4 20.4 2.5 6398 6476 8241 26.79 27.12 34.5 54 1.2 1.46 1.47 1.45 0.45 0.46 0.58 23.6 23.9 30.4 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM18-013LDCA 45.4 46.92 1.52 COAL S5U TM0013-001 1.42 21.2 21.4 20.4 2.5 6398 6476 8241 26.79 27.12 34.5 54 1.2 1.46 1.47 1.45 0.45 0.46 0.58 23.6 23.9 30.4 Mylec Wash Datapoint



TM19-020LDC 45.1 45.38 0.28 COAL S5U TM020-001 1.33 12.5 12.7 12 6.5 7222 7317 8378 30.23 30.63 35.07 60.1 1.3 1.39 1.4 1.38 0.47 0.48 0.55 26.1 26.4 30.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint















TM19-020LDC 48.61 48.88 0.27 COAL S5L TM020-002 1.66 34.1 34.5 32.8 2 5324 5394 8241 22.29 22.58 34.5 44.2 1.3 1.6 1.61 1.59 0.26 0.26 0.4 20.4 20.7 31.6 Mylec Wash Datapoint

Hole_IDFrom

(m)To (m)

Length

(m)Litho

Seam


Ash

%_adAsh %_d

Ash

%_IS

5%_M

IS

CSN

CV

kcal_kg

ad

CV

kcal_kg

d

CV

kcal_kg

daf

CV

MJ_kg

ad

CV

MJ_kg

d

CV MJ

kg daf

FC %

ad

IM

%

ad

RD ad RD d

RD

IS_5_

%

MIS

TS %

ad

TS %

d

TS %

daf

Vol %

ad

Vol %

d

Vol %

dafComments

TM19-020LDC 48.88 48.95 0.07 CARBMDST S5L TM020-002 1.66 34.1 34.5 32.8 2 5324 5394 8241 22.29 22.58 34.5 44.2 1.3 1.6 1.61 1.59 0.26 0.26 0.4 20.4 20.7 31.6 Mylec Wash Datapoint






TM19-020LDC 49.63 49.81 0.18 SLTST S5L TM020-003 1.52 23.2 23.5 22.3 1.5 5974 6053 7913 25.01 25.34 33.13 50.7 1.3 1.52 1.53 1.51 0.28 0.28 0.37 24.8 25.1 32.8 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-020LDC 49.81 50.11 0.3 COAL S5L TM020-003 1.52 23.2 23.5 22.3 1.5 5974 6053 7913 25.01 25.34 33.13 50.7 1.3 1.52 1.53 1.51 0.28 0.28 0.37 24.8 25.1 32.8 Mylec Wash Datapoint










TM19-020LDC 51.6 51.72 0.12 CARBMDST S5L TM020-003 1.52 23.2 23.5 22.3 1.5 5974 6053 7913 25.01 25.34 33.13 50.7 1.3 1.52 1.53 1.51 0.28 0.28 0.37 24.8 25.1 32.8 Mylec Wash Datapoint





TM19-022LDC 94.79 94.94 0.15 COAL S5U TM022-002 1.41 23.3 23.6 22.4 0.5 6206 6288 8231 25.98 26.32 34.46 50.6 1.3 1.48 1.49 1.47 0.36 0.36 0.48 24.8 25.1 32.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint




TM19-022LDC 95.55 95.7 0.15 MDST S5U TM022-002 1.41 23.3 23.6 22.4 0.5 6206 6288 8231 25.98 26.32 34.46 50.6 1.3 1.48 1.49 1.47 0.36 0.36 0.48 24.8 25.1 32.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint












TM19-022LDC 99.93 100 0.07 MDST S5U TM022-002 1.41 23.3 23.6 22.4 0.5 6206 6288 8231 25.98 26.32 34.46 50.6 1.3 1.48 1.49 1.47 0.36 0.36 0.48 24.8 25.1 32.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-022LDC 100 100.57 0.57 COAL S5U TM022-002 1.41 23.3 23.6 22.4 0.5 6206 6288 8231 25.98 26.32 34.46 50.6 1.3 1.48 1.49 1.47 0.36 0.36 0.48 24.8 25.1 32.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-022LDC 108.32 108.94 0.62 COAL S5M TM022-005 1.44 30.6 31 29.4 1 5668 5737 8311 23.73 24.02 34.79 45.9 1.2 1.54 1.55 1.53 0.59 0.6 0.87 22.3 22.6 32.7 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-022LDC 108.94 109.24 0.3 MDST S5M TM022-005 1.44 30.6 31 29.4 1 5668 5737 8311 23.73 24.02 34.79 45.9 1.2 1.54 1.55 1.53 0.59 0.6 0.87 22.3 22.6 32.7 Mylec Wash Datapoint




TM19-022LDC 109.98 110.03 0.05 MDST S5M TM022-005 1.44 30.6 31 29.4 1 5668 5737 8311 23.73 24.02 34.79 45.9 1.2 1.54 1.55 1.53 0.59 0.6 0.87 22.3 22.6 32.7 Mylec Wash Datapoint




TM19-022LDC 110.84 111 0.16 COAL S5M TM022-005 1.44 30.6 31 29.4 1 5668 5737 8311 23.73 24.02 34.79 45.9 1.2 1.54 1.55 1.53 0.59 0.6 0.87 22.3 22.6 32.7 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-022LDC 111 111.09 0.09 COAL S5M TM022-005 1.44 30.6 31 29.4 1 5668 5737 8311 23.73 24.02 34.79 45.9 1.2 1.54 1.55 1.53 0.59 0.6 0.87 22.3 22.6 32.7 Mylec Wash Datapoint














Hole_IDFrom

(m)To (m)

Length

(m)Litho

Seam


Ash

%_adAsh %_d

Ash

%_IS

5%_M

IS

CSN

CV

kcal_kg

ad

CV

kcal_kg

d

CV

kcal_kg

daf

CV

MJ_kg

ad

CV

MJ_kg

d

CV MJ

kg daf

FC %

ad

IM

%

ad

RD ad RD d

RD

IS_5_

%

MIS

TS %

ad

TS %

d

TS %

daf

Vol %

ad

Vol %

d

Vol %

dafComments







TM19-024LDC 46.05 46.29 0.24 MDST S5U TM024-003 1.88 46 46.7 44.4 2.5 4380 4447 8343 18.34 18.62 34.93 33.9 1.5 1.69 1.71 1.67 0.43 0.44 0.82 18.6 18.9 35.4 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-024LDC 46.29 46.49 0.2 COAL S5U TM024-003 1.88 46 46.7 44.4 2.5 4380 4447 8343 18.34 18.62 34.93 33.9 1.5 1.69 1.71 1.67 0.43 0.44 0.82 18.6 18.9 35.4 Mylec Wash Datapoint






TM19-027LDC 65.64 65.89 0.25 COAL S7 TM027-002 1.36 18.1 18.3 17.4 7 6770 6845 8379 28.34 28.66 35.07 52.8 1.1 1.42 1.43 1.41 0.95 0.96 1.18 28 28.3 34.7 Mylec Wash Datapoint




TM19-027LDC 66.37 66.88 0.51 SLTST S7 TM027-003 2.24 80.3 81.2 77.1 -99 1216 1230 6538 5.09 5.15 27.37 10 1.1 2.29 2.32 2.26 0.19 0.19 1.02 8.6 8.7 46.2

TM19-027LDC 66.88 67.37 0.49 COAL S7 TM027-004 1.63 42.6 43.1 40.9 2 4682 4734 8316 19.6 19.82 34.81 36.7 1.1 1.67 1.68 1.66 0.55 0.56 0.98 19.6 19.8 34.8 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-027LDC 67.37 67.42 0.05 CARBMDSTCOAL S7 TM027-004 1.63 42.6 43.1 40.9 2 4682 4734 8316 19.6 19.82 34.81 36.7 1.1 1.67 1.68 1.66 0.55 0.56 0.98 19.6 19.8 34.8 Mylec Wash Datapoint



TM19-027LDC 68.74 68.81 0.07 COAL S7 TM027-006 1.33 15.7 15.9 15.1 7 7062 7133 8478 29.57 29.87 35.5 54.1 1 1.39 1.4 1.38 0.83 0.84 1 29.2 29.5 35.1 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-027LDC 68.81 68.9 0.09 CARBMDSTCOAL S7 TM027-006 1.33 15.7 15.9 15.1 7 7062 7133 8478 29.57 29.87 35.5 54.1 1 1.39 1.4 1.38 0.83 0.84 1 29.2 29.5 35.1 Mylec Wash Datapoint



TM19-027LDC 88.12 88.7 0.58 COAL S6U TM027-008 1.33 11.8 12 11.4 3.5 7250 7360 8362 30.35 30.81 35.01 60.4 1.5 1.39 1.4 1.38 0.28 0.28 0.32 26.3 26.7 30.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-027LDC 88.7 88.77 0.07 SLTST S6U TM027-008 1.33 11.8 12 11.4 3.5 7250 7360 8362 30.35 30.81 35.01 60.4 1.5 1.39 1.4 1.38 0.28 0.28 0.32 26.3 26.7 30.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint





















TM19-027LDC 95.12 95.24 0.12 CARBMDST UNK TM027-008 1.33 11.8 12 11.4 3.5 7250 7360 8362 30.35 30.81 35.01 60.4 1.5 1.39 1.4 1.38 0.28 0.28 0.32 26.3 26.7 30.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-027LDC 95.24 95.69 0.45 COAL S6M TM027-008 1.33 11.8 12 11.4 3.5 7250 7360 8362 30.35 30.81 35.01 60.4 1.5 1.39 1.4 1.38 0.28 0.28 0.32 26.3 26.7 30.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-027LDC 96.73 97.02 0.29 COAL S6L TM027-011 1.64 38.8 39.3 37.3 2 4968 5033 8294 20.8 21.07 34.72 40 1.3 1.63 1.64 1.62 0.4 0.41 0.67 19.9 20.2 33.2 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-027LDC 97.02 97.11 0.09 CARBMDST S6L TM027-011 1.64 38.8 39.3 37.3 2 4968 5033 8294 20.8 21.07 34.72 40 1.3 1.63 1.64 1.62 0.4 0.41 0.67 19.9 20.2 33.2 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-027LDC 97.11 97.34 0.23 COAL S6L TM027-011 1.64 38.8 39.3 37.3 2 4968 5033 8294 20.8 21.07 34.72 40 1.3 1.63 1.64 1.62 0.4 0.41 0.67 19.9 20.2 33.2 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-027LDC 97.34 97.44 0.1 CARBMDST UNK TM027-011 1.64 38.8 39.3 37.3 2 4968 5033 8294 20.8 21.07 34.72 40 1.3 1.63 1.64 1.62 0.4 0.41 0.67 19.9 20.2 33.2 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-027LDCB 88.22 88.52 0.3 COAL S6U TM027B-002 1.39 14.7 15 14.2 3 6930 7064 8309 29.02 29.58 34.8 56.5 1.9 1.42 1.43 1.41 0.3 0.31 0.36 26.9 27.4 32.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint



TM19-027LDCB 88.92 89 0.08 MDST S6U TM027B-002 1.39 14.7 15 14.2 3 6930 7064 8309 29.02 29.58 34.8 56.5 1.9 1.42 1.43 1.41 0.3 0.31 0.36 26.9 27.4 32.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-027LDCB 89 89.23 0.23 COAL S6U TM027B-002 1.39 14.7 15 14.2 3 6930 7064 8309 29.02 29.58 34.8 56.5 1.9 1.42 1.43 1.41 0.3 0.31 0.36 26.9 27.4 32.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint






Hole_IDFrom

(m)To (m)

Length

(m)Litho

Seam


Ash

%_adAsh %_d

Ash

%_IS

5%_M

IS

CSN

CV

kcal_kg

ad

CV

kcal_kg

d

CV

kcal_kg

daf

CV

MJ_kg

ad

CV

MJ_kg

d

CV MJ

kg daf

FC %

ad

IM

%

ad

RD ad RD d

RD

IS_5_

%

MIS

TS %

ad

TS %

d

TS %

daf

Vol %

ad

Vol %

d

Vol %

dafComments




TM19-027LDCB 91.75 92.1 0.35 MDST UNK TM027B-002 1.39 14.7 15 14.2 3 6930 7064 8309 29.02 29.58 34.8 56.5 1.9 1.42 1.43 1.41 0.3 0.31 0.36 26.9 27.4 32.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-027LDCB 92.1 92.62 0.52 DRTCCOAL S6M TM027B-002 1.39 14.7 15 14.2 3 6930 7064 8309 29.02 29.58 34.8 56.5 1.9 1.42 1.43 1.41 0.3 0.31 0.36 26.9 27.4 32.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-027LDCB 92.62 92.7 0.08 DRTCCOAL S6M TM027B-002 1.39 14.7 15 14.2 3 6930 7064 8309 29.02 29.58 34.8 56.5 1.9 1.42 1.43 1.41 0.3 0.31 0.36 26.9 27.4 32.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-027LDCB 93.65 93.94 0.29 COAL S6L TM027B-005 1.58 33.7 34.2 32.5 2.5 5314 5400 8213 22.24 22.6 34.37 43.6 1.6 1.59 1.61 1.57 0.41 0.42 0.63 21.1 21.4 32.6 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-027LDCB 93.94 93.99 0.05 CARBMDST S6L TM027B-005 1.58 33.7 34.2 32.5 2.5 5314 5400 8213 22.24 22.6 34.37 43.6 1.6 1.59 1.61 1.57 0.41 0.42 0.63 21.1 21.4 32.6 Mylec Wash Datapoint


TM19-027LDCB 94.58 94.68 0.1 CARBMDST S6L TM027B-005 1.58 33.7 34.2 32.5 2.5 5314 5400 8213 22.24 22.6 34.37 43.6 1.6 1.59 1.61 1.57 0.41 0.42 0.63 21.1 21.4 32.6 Mylec Wash Datapoint


TM19-028LDC 61.22 61.45 0.23 COAL S2U TM028-001 1.49 27 27.4 26 1.5 5894 5972 8220 24.68 25.01 34.42 49.6 1.3 1.55 1.56 1.54 0.43 0.44 0.6 22.1 22.4 30.8 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-028LDC 61.45 61.54 0.09 MDST S2U TM028-001 1.49 27 27.4 26 1.5 5894 5972 8220 24.68 25.01 34.42 49.6 1.3 1.55 1.56 1.54 0.43 0.44 0.6 22.1 22.4 30.8 Mylec Wash Datapoint








TM19-028LDC 63.16 63.33 0.17 CARBMDST S2U TM028-001 1.49 27 27.4 26 1.5 5894 5972 8220 24.68 25.01 34.42 49.6 1.3 1.55 1.56 1.54 0.43 0.44 0.6 22.1 22.4 30.8 Mylec Wash Datapoint

















TM19-028LDC 70.73 71.15 0.42 COAL S2L TM028-004_005 1.44 25.7 26 24.7 4.5 6138 6219 8408 25.7 26.04 35.21 48.7 1.3 1.51 1.52 1.5 0.54 0.55 0.74 24.3 24.6 33.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint








TM19-028LDC 73.81 73.82 0.01 MDST S2L TM028-004_005 1.44 25.7 26 24.7 4.5 6138 6219 8408 25.7 26.04 35.21 48.7 1.3 1.51 1.52 1.5 0.54 0.55 0.74 24.3 24.6 33.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint


















TM19-028LDC 78.25 78.45 0.2 MDST UNK TM028-004_005 1.44 25.7 26 24.7 4.5 6138 6219 8408 25.7 26.04 35.21 48.7 1.3 1.51 1.52 1.5 0.54 0.55 0.74 24.3 24.6 33.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint

Hole_IDFrom

(m)To (m)

Length

(m)Litho

Seam


Ash

%_adAsh %_d

Ash

%_IS

5%_M

IS

CSN

CV

kcal_kg

ad

CV

kcal_kg

d

CV

kcal_kg

daf

CV

MJ_kg

ad

CV

MJ_kg

d

CV MJ

kg daf

FC %

ad

IM

%

ad

RD ad RD d

RD

IS_5_

%

MIS

TS %

ad

TS %

d

TS %

daf

Vol %

ad

Vol %

d

Vol %

dafComments

TM19-029LDC 128.88 129.66 0.78 COAL S2U TM029-002 1.83 41.1 41.6 39.5 1 4694 4751 8135 19.65 19.89 34.06 39.3 1.2 1.7 1.71 1.69 0.42 0.43 0.73 18.4 18.6 31.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint


TM19-029LDC 129.86 129.88 0.02 CARBMDST S2U TM029-002 1.83 41.1 41.6 39.5 1 4694 4751 8135 19.65 19.89 34.06 39.3 1.2 1.7 1.71 1.69 0.42 0.43 0.73 18.4 18.6 31.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint


TM19-029LDC 129.94 130.1 0.16 MDST S2U TM029-002 1.83 41.1 41.6 39.5 1 4694 4751 8135 19.65 19.89 34.06 39.3 1.2 1.7 1.71 1.69 0.42 0.43 0.73 18.4 18.6 31.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint




















TM19-029LDC 134.21 134.64 0.43 SLTST S2U TM029-002 1.83 41.1 41.6 39.5 1 4694 4751 8135 19.65 19.89 34.06 39.3 1.2 1.7 1.71 1.69 0.42 0.43 0.73 18.4 18.6 31.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-029LDC 134.64 134.8 0.16 SLTST S2U TM029-002 1.83 41.1 41.6 39.5 1 4694 4751 8135 19.65 19.89 34.06 39.3 1.2 1.7 1.71 1.69 0.42 0.43 0.73 18.4 18.6 31.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint






TM19-029LDC 139.75 140 0.25 COAL S2L TM029-005 1.76 45.3 45.9 43.6 1.5 4452 4511 8337 18.64 18.89 34.91 35.4 1.3 1.72 1.74 1.7 0.71 0.72 1.33 18 18.2 33.7 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-029LDC 140 140.2 0.2 COAL S2L TM029-005 1.76 45.3 45.9 43.6 1.5 4452 4511 8337 18.64 18.89 34.91 35.4 1.3 1.72 1.74 1.7 0.71 0.72 1.33 18 18.2 33.7 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-029LDC 140.2 140.47 0.27 COAL S2L TM029-005 1.76 45.3 45.9 43.6 1.5 4452 4511 8337 18.64 18.89 34.91 35.4 1.3 1.72 1.74 1.7 0.71 0.72 1.33 18 18.2 33.7 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-029LDC 140.47 140.83 0.36 MDST S2L TM029-005 1.76 45.3 45.9 43.6 1.5 4452 4511 8337 18.64 18.89 34.91 35.4 1.3 1.72 1.74 1.7 0.71 0.72 1.33 18 18.2 33.7 Mylec Wash Datapoint






























Hole_IDFrom

(m)To (m)

Length

(m)Litho

Seam


Ash

%_adAsh %_d

Ash

%_IS

5%_M

IS

CSN

CV

kcal_kg

ad

CV

kcal_kg

d

CV

kcal_kg

daf

CV

MJ_kg

ad

CV

MJ_kg

d

CV MJ

kg daf

FC %

ad

IM

%

ad

RD ad RD d

RD

IS_5_

%

MIS

TS %

ad

TS %

d

TS %

daf

Vol %

ad

Vol %

d

Vol %

dafComments








TM19-040LDC 26.95 27.17 0.22 COAL S4M TM040-004 1.46 21.1 21.3 20.2 1 6422 6480 8233 26.89 27.13 34.47 55.4 0.9 1.48 1.49 1.47 0.34 0.34 0.44 22.6 22.8 29 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-040LDC 27.17 27.24 0.07 CARBMDST S4M TM040-004 1.46 21.1 21.3 20.2 1 6422 6480 8233 26.89 27.13 34.47 55.4 0.9 1.48 1.49 1.47 0.34 0.34 0.44 22.6 22.8 29 Mylec Wash Datapoint























TM19-045LDC 26.5 28.16 1.66 COAL S6U TM045-002 1.38 25.9 26.3 25 3 6052 6144 8336 25.34 25.73 34.9 47.8 1.5 1.5 1.51 1.49 0.6 0.61 0.83 24.8 25.2 34.2 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-045LDC 28.16 28.26 0.1 CARBMDST S6U TM045-002 1.38 25.9 26.3 25 3 6052 6144 8336 25.34 25.73 34.9 47.8 1.5 1.5 1.51 1.49 0.6 0.61 0.83 24.8 25.2 34.2 Mylec Wash Datapoint


TM19-045LDC 28.52 28.61 0.09 CARBMDST S6U TM045-002 1.38 25.9 26.3 25 3 6052 6144 8336 25.34 25.73 34.9 47.8 1.5 1.5 1.51 1.49 0.6 0.61 0.83 24.8 25.2 34.2 Mylec Wash Datapoint






TM19-045LDC 30.09 30.11 0.02 MDST S6U TM045-002 1.38 25.9 26.3 25 3 6052 6144 8336 25.34 25.73 34.9 47.8 1.5 1.5 1.51 1.49 0.6 0.61 0.83 24.8 25.2 34.2 Mylec Wash Datapoint


TM19-045LDC 31.21 31.7 0.49 MDST S6U TM045-002 1.38 25.9 26.3 25 3 6052 6144 8336 25.34 25.73 34.9 47.8 1.5 1.5 1.51 1.49 0.6 0.61 0.83 24.8 25.2 34.2 Mylec Wash Datapoint



TM19-045LDC 33.81 34.02 0.21 COAL S6M TM045-005_006 1.43 26 26.3 25 6 6202 6284 8531 25.96 26.3 35.71 47.8 1.3 1.49 1.5 1.48 0.67 0.68 0.92 24.9 25.2 34.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint




TM19-045LDC 34.81 34.85 0.04 MDST UNK TM045-005_006 1.43 26 26.3 25 6 6202 6284 8531 25.96 26.3 35.71 47.8 1.3 1.49 1.5 1.48 0.67 0.68 0.92 24.9 25.2 34.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-045LDC 34.85 35.32 0.47 COAL S6L TM045-005_006 1.43 26 26.3 25 6 6202 6284 8531 25.96 26.3 35.71 47.8 1.3 1.49 1.5 1.48 0.67 0.68 0.92 24.9 25.2 34.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint




TM19-045LDC 36.05 36.25 0.2 MDST UNK TM045-005_006 1.43 26 26.3 25 6 6202 6284 8531 25.96 26.3 35.71 47.8 1.3 1.49 1.5 1.48 0.67 0.68 0.92 24.9 25.2 34.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-045LDCB 22.62 22.96 0.34 COAL S6U TM045B-002 1.51 30.2 30.6 29.1 3.5 5736 5817 8386 24.01 24.35 35.1 44.6 1.4 1.54 1.55 1.53 0.6 0.61 0.88 23.8 24.1 34.8 Mylec Wash Datapoint


TM19-045LDCB 23.4 23.69 0.29 MDST S6U TM045B-002 1.51 30.2 30.6 29.1 3.5 5736 5817 8386 24.01 24.35 35.1 44.6 1.4 1.54 1.55 1.53 0.6 0.61 0.88 23.8 24.1 34.8 Mylec Wash Datapoint







Hole_IDFrom

(m)To (m)

Length

(m)Litho

Seam


Ash

%_adAsh %_d

Ash

%_IS

5%_M

IS

CSN

CV

kcal_kg

ad

CV

kcal_kg

d

CV

kcal_kg

daf

CV

MJ_kg

ad

CV

MJ_kg

d

CV MJ

kg daf

FC %

ad

IM

%

ad

RD ad RD d

RD

IS_5_

%

MIS

TS %

ad

TS %

d

TS %

daf

Vol %

ad

Vol %

d

Vol %

dafComments















TM19-045LDCB 29.58 29.83 0.25 MDST UNK TM045B-002 1.51 30.2 30.6 29.1 3.5 5736 5817 8386 24.01 24.35 35.1 44.6 1.4 1.54 1.55 1.53 0.6 0.61 0.88 23.8 24.1 34.8 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-045LDCB 29.83 30.15 0.32 MDST UNK TM045B-002 1.51 30.2 30.6 29.1 3.5 5736 5817 8386 24.01 24.35 35.1 44.6 1.4 1.54 1.55 1.53 0.6 0.61 0.88 23.8 24.1 34.8 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-045LDCB 30.15 30.43 0.28 COAL S6M TM045B-002 1.51 30.2 30.6 29.1 3.5 5736 5817 8386 24.01 24.35 35.1 44.6 1.4 1.54 1.55 1.53 0.6 0.61 0.88 23.8 24.1 34.8 Mylec Wash Datapoint



TM19-045LDCB 30.91 31 0.09 COAL S6M TM045B-002 1.51 30.2 30.6 29.1 3.5 5736 5817 8386 24.01 24.35 35.1 44.6 1.4 1.54 1.55 1.53 0.6 0.61 0.88 23.8 24.1 34.8 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-045LDCB 31 31.13 0.13 COAL S6M TM045B-002 1.51 30.2 30.6 29.1 3.5 5736 5817 8386 24.01 24.35 35.1 44.6 1.4 1.54 1.55 1.53 0.6 0.61 0.88 23.8 24.1 34.8 Mylec Wash Datapoint


TM19-045LDCB 33.01 33.24 0.23 COAL S6L TM045B-005 1.57 37.2 37.7 35.8 2.5 5148 5221 8384 21.55 21.86 35.1 39 1.4 1.62 1.63 1.61 0.61 0.62 0.99 22.4 22.7 36.5 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-045LDCB 33.24 33.36 0.12 MDST S6L TM045B-005 1.57 37.2 37.7 35.8 2.5 5148 5221 8384 21.55 21.86 35.1 39 1.4 1.62 1.63 1.61 0.61 0.62 0.99 22.4 22.7 36.5 Mylec Wash Datapoint




TM19-048LDC 12.86 13.8 0.94 COAL S4U TM048-002 1.67 36.2 36.6 34.8 2 5180 5243 8275 21.69 21.95 34.65 42.8 1.2 1.61 1.62 1.6 0.58 0.59 0.93 19.8 20 31.6 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-048LDC 13.8 14.09 0.29 MDST S4U TM048-002 1.67 36.2 36.6 34.8 2 5180 5243 8275 21.69 21.95 34.65 42.8 1.2 1.61 1.62 1.6 0.58 0.59 0.93 19.8 20 31.6 Mylec Wash Datapoint











TM19-050LDC 43.16 43.28 0.12 COAL S4U TM050-002 1.41 21.5 21.7 20.7 1 6448 6520 8331 27 27.3 34.88 55.3 1.1 1.49 1.5 1.48 0.5 0.51 0.65 22.1 22.3 28.6 Mylec Wash Datapoint







TM19-052LDC 94.1 94.17 0.07 COAL S6U TM052-002 1.82 42.5 43.1 40.9 3.5 4646 4707 8267 19.45 19.71 34.61 36 1.3 1.68 1.7 1.66 0.55 0.56 0.98 20.2 20.5 35.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint


TM19-052LDC 94.25 94.28 0.03 CARBMDST S6U TM052-002 1.82 42.5 43.1 40.9 3.5 4646 4707 8267 19.45 19.71 34.61 36 1.3 1.68 1.7 1.66 0.55 0.56 0.98 20.2 20.5 35.9 Mylec Wash Datapoint








TM19-052LDC 99.59 100.02 0.43 COAL S6M TM052-004_005 1.35 13.3 13.5 12.8 5.5 7082 7197 8322 29.65 30.13 34.84 57.5 1.6 1.4 1.41 1.39 0.33 0.34 0.39 27.6 28 32.4 Mylec Wash Datapoint



TM19-052LDC 100.42 100.49 0.07 MDST S6M TM052-004_005 1.35 13.3 13.5 12.8 5.5 7082 7197 8322 29.65 30.13 34.84 57.5 1.6 1.4 1.41 1.39 0.33 0.34 0.39 27.6 28 32.4 Mylec Wash Datapoint





Hole_IDFrom

(m)To (m)

Length

(m)Litho

Seam


Ash

%_adAsh %_d

Ash

%_IS

5%_M

IS

CSN

CV

kcal_kg

ad

CV

kcal_kg

d

CV

kcal_kg

daf

CV

MJ_kg

ad

CV

MJ_kg

d

CV MJ

kg daf

FC %

ad

IM

%

ad

RD ad RD d

RD

IS_5_

%

MIS

TS %

ad

TS %

d

TS %

daf

Vol %

ad

Vol %

d

Vol %

dafComments

TM19-052LDC 101.62 101.63 0.01 CARBMDST S6M TM052-004_005 1.35 13.3 13.5 12.8 5.5 7082 7197 8322 29.65 30.13 34.84 57.5 1.6 1.4 1.41 1.39 0.33 0.34 0.39 27.6 28 32.4 Mylec Wash Datapoint





TM19-052LDC 103.29 104 0.71 COAL S6M TM052-004_005 1.35 13.3 13.5 12.8 5.5 7082 7197 8322 29.65 30.13 34.84 57.5 1.6 1.4 1.41 1.39 0.33 0.34 0.39 27.6 28 32.4 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-052LDC 104 104.61 0.61 COAL S6M TM052-004_005 1.35 13.3 13.5 12.8 5.5 7082 7197 8322 29.65 30.13 34.84 57.5 1.6 1.4 1.41 1.39 0.33 0.34 0.39 27.6 28 32.4 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-052LDC 104.61 104.78 0.17 CARBMDST S6M TM052-004_005 1.35 13.3 13.5 12.8 5.5 7082 7197 8322 29.65 30.13 34.84 57.5 1.6 1.4 1.41 1.39 0.33 0.34 0.39 27.6 28 32.4 Mylec Wash Datapoint




TM19-052LDC 108.62 110.11 1.49 COAL S6L TM052-008 1.3 17.2 17.5 16.6 5 6732 6841 8291 28.19 28.65 34.72 56.6 1.6 1.44 1.45 1.43 0.53 0.54 0.65 24.6 25 30.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint

TM19-052LDC 110.11 111.37 1.26 COAL S6L TM052-008 1.3 17.2 17.5 16.6 5 6732 6841 8291 28.19 28.65 34.72 56.6 1.6 1.44 1.45 1.43 0.53 0.54 0.65 24.6 25 30.3 Mylec Wash Datapoint

The Tent Mountain Minemontem-resources.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2020-04...2020/04/07 · COAL...

Documents

Transcript of The Tent Mountain Minemontem-resources.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/2020-04...2020/04/07 · COAL...