The strength of relationships formed through social media

19
The Strength of Relationships formed through Social Media By: Ryan Foster

description

My Presentation on the effects of social media.

Transcript of The strength of relationships formed through social media

Page 1: The strength of relationships formed through social media

The Strength of

Relationships formed

through Social MediaBy: Ryan Foster

Page 2: The strength of relationships formed through social media

● Degraded social skills from increasing

online interactions● Social Media vs. Social Network Sites(SNS)

● Types of Relationshipso Self Identity

o Parasocial

o Effects from SNS

Where it all came from

Page 3: The strength of relationships formed through social media

● Social Mediao Internet based applications that build on

the … foundation of Web 2.0, and that allow

creation and exchange of… content.

● Social Network Siteso Services that allow users to create a profile,

a list of connections, and explore them

Social Network Sites

Page 4: The strength of relationships formed through social media

● What drives the SNS interaction between

individuals online?

● How may we evaluate SNS interactions?

● What are the most prevalent risks of

SNS?

● What factors affect the strength of

relationships online?

Research Questions

Page 5: The strength of relationships formed through social media

● Interdependent o Response dependent on medium of

communication

● Independent Userso Behaved consistently independent of

medium

Online Identity

Page 6: The strength of relationships formed through social media
Page 7: The strength of relationships formed through social media

● Follow actively follows the events of one

individual to the point that they begin to

associate with them

● Potential Benefits for some

● Lowers Well Being for most

Parasocial Relationships

Page 8: The strength of relationships formed through social media

● Significant influences from community

involvemento but not when involvement is not expected

● Unaffected views of SNS even when

informed of risks/dangers

Outside Influence

Page 9: The strength of relationships formed through social media

● Behavior affected by type of SNS

● Positively for attention

● Negatively behind the sceneso ex-intimate relationships

o online dating

o impulsive destructive comments

Behavioral Effects

Page 10: The strength of relationships formed through social media

● Normal use encouraged by self

presentation and relationships building

● Problematic use from Neuroticism

● Parasocial vs. Reciprocal

SNS Addiction

Page 11: The strength of relationships formed through social media

● Another tool of self-exploration

● Maintain social relationships

● Social time management

What drives the SNS interaction

between individuals online?

Page 12: The strength of relationships formed through social media

● Posting for the benefit of himself, or

● Posting for the benefit of others

How may we evaluate SNS

interactions?

Page 13: The strength of relationships formed through social media

● Like walking down a busy street in a

major city

● Be Aware of your surroundings

● Theft is less obvious

What are the most prevalent

risks of SNS?

Page 14: The strength of relationships formed through social media

● Categorize Relationship

● Evaluate the Purpose of the Relationship

● Verify Actions Accordingly

What factors affect the strength

of relationships online?

Page 15: The strength of relationships formed through social media

● Use of Social Media is like any other

offline facet of life

● Benefits and Abuses are magnified

● Abuses can be harder to see

● Spread Awareness to minimize potential

harm

Implications

Page 16: The strength of relationships formed through social media

● Limited time and depth of articles

searched

● Neuroticism and Attention Seeking

Behavior

● Effects of different SNS characteristics

on psychological well being and SNS

Addiction

Limitations & Future Research

Page 17: The strength of relationships formed through social media

Baek, Y. M., Bae, Y., Jang, H. (2013). Social and Parasocial Relationships on Social Network Sites and Their Differential Relationships with Users' Psychological Well-Being.

Cyber Psychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 16(7), 512-517

boyd, d. m., Ellison, N. B. (2008). Social Network Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13, 210-230

Brandtzæg, P. B., Lüders, M., and Skjetne, J. H. (2010). Too Many Facebook “Friends”? Content Sharing and Sociability Versus the Need for Privacy in Social Network Sites.

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 26, 1006-1030.

Bryer, T. (2013). Designing Social Media Strategies for Effective Citizen Engagement: A Case Example and Model. National Civic Review, 102, 43-50.

Chaulk, K., Jones, T. (2011). Online Obsessive Relational Intrusion: Further Concerns About Facebook. Journal of Family Violence, 26, 245-254.

Chen, H., Kim, Y. (2013). Problematic Use of Social Network Sites: The Interactive Relationship Between Gratifications Sought and Privacy Concerns. CyberPsychology,

Behavior & Social Networking. 16(11), 806-812.

Derrick, J. L., Gabriel, S., Tippin, B. (2008). Parasocial relationships and self-discrepancies. Personal Relationships, 15(2), 261-280.

Floros, G. D., Siomosmd, K. E., Fisoun, V., Dafouli, E., Geroukalis, D. (2013). Adolescent Online Cyberbullying in Greece: The Impact of Parental Online Security Practices,

Bonding and Online Impulsiveness. Journal of School Health. 83 (6), 445-453.

Giota, K. G., Kleftaras, G. (2013). The role of personality and depression in problematic use of social networking sites in Greece. Cyberpsychology. 7(3), 1-10.

Kaplan, A. M., Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons 53 (1), 59-68.

Kimmons, R. (2014). Social Networking Sites, Literacy, and the Authentic Identity Problem. TechTrends. 58, 93-98.

References

Page 18: The strength of relationships formed through social media

Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox a social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological

well-being. American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1032.

Liu, J., Rau, P. (2014). Impact of Self-Consual on Choice of Enterprise Social Media for Knowledge Sharing. Social Behavior & Personality, 42, 1077-1090.

Nadkarni, A. Hofmann, S. G. (2012). Why do People Use Facebook. Personality and Individual Differences. 52, 243-249. Is there an issue number for this and other cites?

Orr E. S., Sisic M., Ross C., Simmering M. G., Arseneault, J.M. , Orr , R. R. (2009). The influence of shyness on the use of Facebook in an undergraduate sample.

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 12, 337–340.

Senft, T., Noble, S. U. (2014) Race and Social Media. In J. Huntsinger & T. Senft, The Social Media Handbook (pp. 107-125). New York, NY: Edwards Brothers Malloy.

Slaugter van Tryon, P. J. Bishop, M. J. (2009). Theoretical foundations for enhancing social connectedness in online learning environments. Distance Learning. 30(3), 291-315.

Stern, L. A., Taylor, K. (2007). Social networking on facebook. Journal of the Communication, Speech & Theatre Association of North Dakota, 20, 9-20.

Stiner, P. (1993, July 5). On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog. The New Yorker.

Vanderhoven, E., Schellen, T., Valcke, M. (2014). Educating Teens about he Risks on Social Network Sites. An intervention study in Secondary Education. Comunicar. 22 (43),

123-131.

Vandeweerd, C., Corvin, J., Coulter, M., Perkins E., Telford, R., Yalcin, A., et al. (2014). A Preliminary Investigation of Risks for Adverse Outcomes of Relationship Seeking on

Social Network Sites (SNS): A descriptive Study of Women Over 50 Seeking Relationships on MySpace in Hillsborough Country, Florida. Journal of Women & Aging 26(2), 126-

145.

References

Page 19: The strength of relationships formed through social media

Questions?