The state of THE State Constitution
description
Transcript of The state of THE State Constitution
THE STATE OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION
Political Science 103A, Lecture #2
California’s Year of Reform?
How Well (or Poorly) Does California Government Perform Today? Conventional Commentary and Academic
Research How Should it be Fixed?
What’s the Right Process? Proposed Solutions UC San Diego’s Role in Reform
Our Twin Challenges
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
1851
1855
1859
1863
1871
1880
1887
1895
1903
1911
1919
1927
1935
1943
1951
1959
1967
1975
1983
1991
1999
Polarization Score in Session
Smoothed Polarization SeriesPer Capita State Spending
(LAO)
Partisan Polarization in Legislature
Judging California Today California’s Two Governments
Legislation: A majoritarian system Budget and Taxes: A consensus (2/3)
system shifting half way to a majoritarian system
Two Ways to Evaluate Government Efficiency: How quickly are issues resolved? Responsiveness: Does the final decision
reflect what voters want?
Legislative Efficiency:Does Polarization Predict Gridlock?
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
-0.2
-0.1
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.519
3119
3519
3919
4319
4719
5119
5519
5919
6319
6719
7119
7519
7919
8319
8719
9119
9519
9920
03
Smoothed Polarization Series
Gridlock Percentage
Legislative Representation(Best in the Nation)
From analysis of 39 policy areas by Justin Phillips and Jeff Lax (Columbia University)
Budget Efficiency:Delays No Matter Who is in Charge
20082007200620052004200320022001200019991998199719961995199419931992199119901989198819871986198519841983198219811980197919781977197619751974197319721971197019691968196719661965196419631962196119601959195819571956195519541953195219511950
-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100Days early/late
June 15th deadline*
Dept. of Finance data courtesy of Eric McGhee
Budget Representation Recipe for Solving Deficits: Leans right
lately Long tradition of mixing cuts with tax
increases 2009, 2011 red budgets in a blue state
Only Tax Increases Mix of Spending Cuts and Tax Increases
Only Through Spending Cuts
4%
57%
31%
"How would you prefer to deal with the state's budget gap?"
(Field Poll, January 2010)
Are We in a Constitutional Crisis?
Partisan Polarization is Here to Stay Sacramento’s divide reflects demographic trends
across the state, voters matching ideology to party (not just gerrymander)
Our Two Governments Perform Differently Our majoritarian legislative process works better than
the budget, but is far from perfect
Popular Consensus on Problems, Less Consensus on Solutions
Three Routes to Reform
Constitutional Convention
Constitutional Conventions:A Risky Route
Legislative Revision
Piecemeal Reform: Constitutional Amendments from Citizens or Legislators
An Appetite for Constitutional Reform
October, 2009 Field Poll on Reform 51-38% favor “fundamental changes” to
constitution 51-39% prefer convention to legislative
commission 32% would be “very likely” to serve as
delegates 48-42% think illegal immigration should be
part of constitutional debate
But few specific reforms have majority support, and “Repair California” convention call fizzled
So, What Reforms do Voters Want? Traditional Polls Ask Voters for Quick
Judgments About Complex Issues (October 2009 Field Poll): 23% support for flattening California’s
income tax 23% support for creating a new type of
sales tax 27% support for allowing legislature to
raise taxes with a majority rather than 2/3 vote
37% support for limiting Prop. 13 protections to houses
Alternative Approach:Get California Together in a Room
June 2011 “deliberative poll” on constitutional reform in California
400 randomly sampled voters spent a weekend together in Torrance after doing “homework”
Polled on Friday and Sunday
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
32%
52%46% 45%
50%
72%80%
27%
Friday Support
Sunday Support
Deliberation Led to Consensus
Piecemeal Reform Round 1 (2010)
June 2010 Primary
Prop. 14 -- PASSED Creates a “top-two”
primary designed to open the door to legislative moderation
Prop. 15 -- FAILED
Allows a pilot program of public financing in Secretary of State elections, funded by tax on lobbyists
November 2010 General
Vote for Budget Changes from 2/3 to 50%+1 (P)
Vote For Fees Changes from 50%+1 to 2/3 (P)
Protect City Finances (P) Expand Citizens Redistricting
Commission to Congress (P) Eliminate Citizens
Redistricting Commission (F)
Piecemeal Reform, Round Two (2012)
June 2012 Primary
Prop. 28 -- Amends term limits
by allowing legislators to spend up to 12 years in one house of state legislature
Does not apply to today’s legislators
Passed 61-39%
November 2012 General Election
Series of budget reforms from deliberative poll, backed by California Forward and Think Long (Prop. 31) FAILED
Competing tax increases from Governor PASSED and Molly Munger FAILED (30 and 38)
Redistricting referendum (40) FAILED
Limits on corporate giving, union fundraising and giving (32) FAILED
CaliforniaChoices.org website viewed by 100,000 Californians for an average of 5 minutes in the weeks leading up to the November, 2012 election