The state of THE State Constitution

21
THE STATE OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION Political Science 103A, Lecture #2

description

The state of THE State Constitution. Political Science 103A, Lecture #2. California’s Year of Reform? . How Well (or Poorly) Does California Government Perform Today? Conventional Commentary and Academic Research How Should it be Fixed? What’s the Right Process? Proposed Solutions - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The state of THE State Constitution

Page 1: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

THE STATE OF THE STATE CONSTITUTION

 

Political Science 103A, Lecture #2

Page 2: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

California’s Year of Reform?

How Well (or Poorly) Does California Government Perform Today? Conventional Commentary and Academic

Research How Should it be Fixed?

What’s the Right Process? Proposed Solutions UC San Diego’s Role in Reform

Page 3: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

Our Twin Challenges

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

1851

1855

1859

1863

1871

1880

1887

1895

1903

1911

1919

1927

1935

1943

1951

1959

1967

1975

1983

1991

1999

Polarization Score in Session

Smoothed Polarization SeriesPer Capita State Spending

(LAO)

Partisan Polarization in Legislature

Page 4: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

Judging California Today California’s Two Governments

Legislation: A majoritarian system Budget and Taxes: A consensus (2/3)

system shifting half way to a majoritarian system

Two Ways to Evaluate Government Efficiency: How quickly are issues resolved? Responsiveness: Does the final decision

reflect what voters want?

Page 5: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

Legislative Efficiency:Does Polarization Predict Gridlock?

0.0

10.0

20.0

30.0

40.0

50.0

60.0

70.0

80.0

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.519

3119

3519

3919

4319

4719

5119

5519

5919

6319

6719

7119

7519

7919

8319

8719

9119

9519

9920

03

Smoothed Polarization Series

Gridlock Percentage

Page 6: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

Legislative Representation(Best in the Nation)

From analysis of 39 policy areas by Justin Phillips and Jeff Lax (Columbia University)

Page 7: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

Budget Efficiency:Delays No Matter Who is in Charge

20082007200620052004200320022001200019991998199719961995199419931992199119901989198819871986198519841983198219811980197919781977197619751974197319721971197019691968196719661965196419631962196119601959195819571956195519541953195219511950

-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100Days early/late

June 15th deadline*

Dept. of Finance data courtesy of Eric McGhee

Page 8: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

Budget Representation Recipe for Solving Deficits: Leans right

lately Long tradition of mixing cuts with tax

increases 2009, 2011 red budgets in a blue state

Only Tax Increases Mix of Spending Cuts and Tax Increases

Only Through Spending Cuts

4%

57%

31%

"How would you prefer to deal with the state's budget gap?"

(Field Poll, January 2010)

Page 9: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

Are We in a Constitutional Crisis?

Partisan Polarization is Here to Stay Sacramento’s divide reflects demographic trends

across the state, voters matching ideology to party (not just gerrymander)

Our Two Governments Perform Differently Our majoritarian legislative process works better than

the budget, but is far from perfect

Popular Consensus on Problems, Less Consensus on Solutions

Page 10: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

Three Routes to Reform

Page 11: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

Constitutional Convention

Page 12: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

Constitutional Conventions:A Risky Route

Page 13: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

Legislative Revision

Page 14: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

Piecemeal Reform: Constitutional Amendments from Citizens or Legislators

Page 15: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

An Appetite for Constitutional Reform

October, 2009 Field Poll on Reform 51-38% favor “fundamental changes” to

constitution 51-39% prefer convention to legislative

commission 32% would be “very likely” to serve as

delegates 48-42% think illegal immigration should be

part of constitutional debate

But few specific reforms have majority support, and “Repair California” convention call fizzled

Page 16: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

So, What Reforms do Voters Want? Traditional Polls Ask Voters for Quick

Judgments About Complex Issues (October 2009 Field Poll): 23% support for flattening California’s

income tax 23% support for creating a new type of

sales tax 27% support for allowing legislature to

raise taxes with a majority rather than 2/3 vote

37% support for limiting Prop. 13 protections to houses

Page 17: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

Alternative Approach:Get California Together in a Room

June 2011 “deliberative poll” on constitutional reform in California

400 randomly sampled voters spent a weekend together in Torrance after doing “homework”

Polled on Friday and Sunday

Page 18: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

32%

52%46% 45%

50%

72%80%

27%

Friday Support

Sunday Support

Deliberation Led to Consensus

Page 19: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

Piecemeal Reform Round 1 (2010)

June 2010 Primary

Prop. 14 -- PASSED Creates a “top-two”

primary designed to open the door to legislative moderation

Prop. 15 -- FAILED

Allows a pilot program of public financing in Secretary of State elections, funded by tax on lobbyists

November 2010 General

Vote for Budget Changes from 2/3 to 50%+1 (P)

Vote For Fees Changes from 50%+1 to 2/3 (P)

Protect City Finances (P) Expand Citizens Redistricting

Commission to Congress (P) Eliminate Citizens

Redistricting Commission (F)

Page 20: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

Piecemeal Reform, Round Two (2012)

June 2012 Primary

Prop. 28 -- Amends term limits

by allowing legislators to spend up to 12 years in one house of state legislature

Does not apply to today’s legislators

Passed 61-39%

November 2012 General Election

Series of budget reforms from deliberative poll, backed by California Forward and Think Long (Prop. 31) FAILED

Competing tax increases from Governor PASSED and Molly Munger FAILED (30 and 38)

Redistricting referendum (40) FAILED

Limits on corporate giving, union fundraising and giving (32) FAILED

Page 21: The state  of  THE State  Constitution

CaliforniaChoices.org website viewed by 100,000 Californians for an average of 5 minutes in the weeks leading up to the November, 2012 election