The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

61
State of Managed Runtimes Attila Szegedi @asz

description

There’s JVM, and that’s it, right? Well, not exactly. Even within JVM, there’s an increasing support for running all kinds of non-Java languages: we have invokedynamic, but it’s being improved, and new layers of functionality are emerging on top of it, making JVM a better home for all kinds of programming languages. There’s life outside of JVM too. JavaScript seems to be a new assembler-lever compilation target even for C programs (I’ll show some amusing examples of what exactly you can run these days in a browser) , and there are some independent efforts at managed runtimes in various stages of completion that seem promising – PyPy, Topaz, Rubinius, Parrot VM (it’s alive again!). This talk is admittedly a language-runtime-enthusiast’s walk-through the things he finds interesting happening this year. Recorded at GeekOut 2013.

Transcript of The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Page 1: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Stateof

Managed RuntimesAttila Szegedi

@asz

Page 2: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

THE FOLLOWING IS INTENDED TO OUTLINE OUR GENERAL PRODUCT DIRECTION. FOR INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY, AND MAY NOT BE INCORPORATED INTO ANY CONTRACT. IT IS NOT A COMMITMENT TO DELIVER ANY MATERIAL, CODE, OR FUNCTIONALITY, AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON IN MAKING PURCHASING DECISION. THE DEVELOPMENT, RELEASE, AND TIMING OF ANY FEATURES OR FUNCTIONALITY DESCRIBED FOR ORACLE'S PRODUCTS REMAINS AT THE SOLE DISCRETION OF ORACLE.

Page 3: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

What is avirtual machine?

Page 4: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

A virtual machine is…

• a software… (not hardware)

• …designed as runtime environment for other programs… (open ended)

• …that conform to a particular machine specification…

• …either existing hardware specification…

• …or entirely synthetic specification.

Page 5: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

This is a virtual machine

Page 6: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

This is a virtual machine

• a software…

• …designed as runtime environment for other programs… (operating systems, mostly)

• …that conform to a particular machine specification…

• …in this case, a particular combination of x86 CPU and other goodies (graphics, audio, IO).

Page 7: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

This is a virtual machine

• This is not the kind of a virtual machine I’m talking about today.

Page 8: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

What we’ll survey today

• Java Virtual Machine

• Parrot

• Some applications of Low Level Virtual Machine

• Rubinius

• PyPy

Page 9: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

There’s lots of ways to target programs today

• Directly for hardware.

• Compiled for a virtual machine.

• Have it interpreted.

• These are not mutually exclusive.

Page 10: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

What are benefits of managed runtimes?

• Automatic memory management

• Object model

• Code transformations

• ...

Page 11: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Java Virtual Machine

• Probably the best known VM out there.

• Started out as a VM for executing programs in Java.

• Today it has a vibrant ecosystem with myriad languages around it.

Page 12: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Java Virtual Machine

• Defined as a stack-based machine.

• Built-in concept of classes, objects, and fixed-size arrays.

• Classes have fixed field layout, with strongly typed field types.

• Single inheritance for classes.

Page 13: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

JVM as target for dynamic languages

• Fixed-layout classes make it harder.

• People end up with hashtables etc.

• Leading to poor interop with Java.

• Your dynamic object doesn’t look like a Java object to Java program.

Page 14: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

JVM as target for dynamic languages

• No multiple dispatch.

• Wait, doesn’t Java have overloaded methods?

• It does, but they’re resolved by the Java compiler, not by the VM.

• Every language has to figure it out themselves.

• No pluggable dispatch.

Page 15: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

JVM as target for dynamic languages

• Where it excels:

• Threading support

• Memory management

• JIT compiler

Page 16: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

JVM as target for dynamic languages

• How to fix the deficiencies for dynamic languages?

• Step 1: INVOKEDYNAMIC

• Step 2: high-level operation resolver framework

• This is what I’m doing by day.

Page 17: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Invokedynamic lets you be abstract

Duck duck = ...;

duck.quack();

INVOKEINTERFACE quack(Duck)V

Page 18: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Invokedynamic lets you be abstract

Object duck = ...;

duck.quack(); // won’t work in Java!

INVOKEDYNAMIC call:quack(Object)Object

Page 19: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Invokedynamic lets you be abstract

INVOKEINTERFACE quack(Duck)V

vs.

INVOKEDYNAMIC call:quack(Object)Object

• Doesn’t prescribe types

• Doesn’t prescribe dispatch

Page 20: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Invokedynamic lets you be abstract

Duck duck = ...;

Voice voice = duck.voice;

INVOKEINTERFACE getVoice(Duck)Voice

Page 21: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Invokedynamic lets you be abstract

Object duck = ...;

Object voice = duck.voice;

INVOKEDYNAMIC get:voice(Object)Object

Page 22: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Invokedynamic lets you be abstract

INVOKEINTERFACE getVoice(Duck)Voice

vs.

INVOKEDYNAMIC get:voice(Object)Object

• “get” can map to a field getter, array element getter, or a property method implementation.

• Okay, but what is mapping it?

Page 23: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Bootstrap methodspublic static CallSite bootstrap( String operation, MethodType signature)

• The JVM will invoke it with bootstrap(“get:voice”, MethodType(Object.class, Object.class))

• We can return a “CallSite” - basically a slot with a target function pointer.

• Target can be set multiple times.

Page 24: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Putting it togetherpublic class Ducks { public static class ShyDuck { public void quack() { System.out.println("...quack?"); } }

public static class LoudDuck { public void quack() { System.out.println("QUACK!"); } }

public static class ConfusedDuck { public void quack() { System.out.println("Woof!"); } }}

Page 25: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Putting it together

var ducks = [ new org.szegedi.geekout2103.Ducks.ShyDuck(), new org.szegedi.geekout2103.Ducks.LoudDuck(), new org.szegedi.geekout2103.Ducks.ConfusedDuck()]

for each(duck in ducks) { duck.quack()}

Page 26: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Putting it togetherALOAD 2INVOKEDYNAMIC dyn:getProp:duck(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object; [ jdk/nashorn/internal/runtime/linker/Bootstrap.bootstrap((Ljava/lang/invoke/MethodHandles$Lookup;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/invoke/MethodType;I)Ljava/lang/invoke/CallSite;)]DUPINVOKEDYNAMIC dyn:getMethod:quack(Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object; [ jdk/nashorn/internal/runtime/linker/Bootstrap.bootstrap((Ljava/lang/invoke/MethodHandles$Lookup;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/invoke/MethodType;I)Ljava/lang/invoke/CallSite;)]SWAPINVOKEDYNAMIC dyn:call(Ljava/lang/Object;Ljava/lang/Object;)Ljava/lang/Object; [ jdk/nashorn/internal/runtime/linker/Bootstrap.bootstrap((Ljava/lang/invoke/MethodHandles$Lookup;Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/invoke/MethodType;I)Ljava/lang/invoke/CallSite;)]

Page 27: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

How’s JVM faring so far

• Java 8 will ship Nashorn, a JavaScript-on-the-JVM

• completely INVOKEDYNAMIC based

• in-house dogfooding of INVOKEDYNAMIC

• A lot of other languages, both using Indy and not, already target the JVM. I hear some are here at this conference too :-)

• My Dynalink project (on GitHub) helps you reduce the pain of providing high level operations for your language.

Page 28: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Parrot virtual machine

• Started out as a VM for Perl 6.

• Now it is language agnostic.

• Specifically designed with dynamic languages in mind.

Page 29: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Parrot virtual machine

• Objects are “polymorphic containers” with changing layout.

• Register based (not stack based as JVM).

• Continuations as primary expression of control flow.

• Built-in opcodes invokecc, yield, tailcall, capture_lex, newclosure…

Page 30: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Parrot virtual machine

• Cross-level language interop is basically built-in

• getprop, setprop opcodes!

• opcodes for loading languages and registering compilers!

• Much higher level bytecode operations than JVM.

• Basically starts out with Indy+Metaobject Protocols built in.

Page 31: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Parrot virtual machine

• Basic input formats:

• Parrot Intermediate Representation (PIR)

• Parrot Abstract Syntax Tree (PAST)

Page 32: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Parrot virtual machine• PIR is human readable assembly-level language

.sub factorial # Get input parameter. .param int n

# return (n > 1 ? n * factorial(n - 1) : 1) .local int result

if n > 1 goto recurse result = 1 goto return

recurse: $I0 = n - 1 result = factorial($I0) result *= n

return: .return (result) .end

Page 33: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

LLVM

• It’s not actually a VM.

• Used to stand for “Low-Level Virtual Machine”.

• Today, LLVM is the name of the project, and it’s not considered an acronym.

• It’s a compiler toolchain project.

Page 34: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

LLVM• Register based intermediate representation

define i32 @add1(i32 %a, i32 %b) {entry: %tmp1 = add i32 %a, %b ret i32 %tmp1} define i32 @add2<i32 %a, i32 %b) {entry: %tmp1 = icmp eq i32 %a, 0 br i1 %tmp1, label %done, label %recurse recurse: %tmp2 = sub i32 %a, 1 %tmp3 = add i32 %b, 1 %tmp4 = call i32 @add2(i32 %tmp2, i32 %tmp3) ret i32 %tmp4 done: ret i32 %b

Page 35: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

LLVM

C

Haskell

Ruby

LUA

Python

Clang

GHC

Rubinius

LLVM-LUA

PyPy

LLVMOptimizer

x86

PPC

ARM

JS

Page 36: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

LLVM

C

Haskell

Ruby

LUA

Python

Clang

GHC

Rubinius

LLVM-LUA

PyPy

LLVMOptimizer

x86

PPC

ARM

JS

Page 37: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

C ClangLLVM

Optimizer JS

Page 38: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Emscripten

• LLVM backend for JavaScript

• Anything that compiles to LLVM IR can be translated to JavaScript.

• Audio, graphics, IO libraries mapped to HTML5 constructs.

Page 39: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi
Page 40: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi
Page 41: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Under the hood{xb(6155784,-1);C[1571410]=1;C[1571411]=16;A[3142824]=0;C[1571413]=32;C[1571414]=641;C[1571415]=481;C[1571416]=31;C[1571417]=1;C[1571418]=1;C[1571419]=38;xc(6550284,0,0,0,93,0,0,6285640,4);xc(6569992,0,0,0,94,0,0,6285640,4)})},{c:(function(){xb(6155764,-1);Fc(6322920,1e4,0);Dba();Eba();Nc(5479372,1);C[1369843]=5970032;C[1369845]=5288420;C[1369851]=0;C[1369852]=0;C[1369846]=0;C[1369847]=0;C[1369848]=0;C[1369849]=0;y[5479400]=0;ub(780,5479372);for(var b=5472972;!(ve(b+84|0),b=b+100|0,5479372==(b|0));){}for(b=5448396;!(ve(b+32|0),b=b+48|0,5472972==(b|0));){}})},{c:(function(){xb(6155744,-1);we(6219428,21);ye(6219440,17,7,-1);ye(6219452,12,7,-1);ze(6219464,1797,183);ye(6219476,13,7,-1);ye(6219488,14,7,-1);Ae(6219500);we(6219512,21);ye(6219524,10,7,0);ze(6219536,2049,1798);Be(6219548);Ce(6219560,1);Fba(6219572,1);ye(6219584,30,7,1);Ae(6219596);ye(6219608,1,7,2);Ce(6219620,0);Ae(6219632);we(6219644,21);ye(6219656,6,7,3);Be(6219668);Ce(6219680,0);ze(6219692,1812,1813);ye(6219704,6,7,4);Be(6219716);Ce(6219728,0);ze(6219740,-30664,0);ye(6219752,16,7,-1);Ae(6219764);xc(6434916,1,170,212,60,0,1,6219428,29);we(6221152,21);ye(6221164,17,9,-1);ye(6221176,12,9,0);ze(6221188,2347,183);ye(6221200,15,9,-1);ye(6221212,13,9,-1);ye(6221224,14,9,-1);Ae(6221236);ye(6221248,1,9,-1);ye(6221260,2,9,-1);Gba(6221272,2,2,2,2);ye(6221284,27,255,1);Hba(6221296,254,86);Be(6221308);Gba(6221320,1,1,1,1);Ce(6221332,1);Ae(6221344);Ae(6221356);ye(6221368,1,9,2);Hba(6221380,260,2);Ce(6221392,0);Ae(6221404);we(6221416,21);ye(6221428,134,9,3);Be(6221440);Ce(6221452,0);ze(6221464,180,2350);ye(6221476,134,9,4);Be(6221488);Ce(6221500,0);ze(6221512,1812,1813);ye(6221524,16,9,-1);Ae(6221536);xc(6446848,1,260,120,49,0,2,6221152,33);we(6187416,21);ye(6187428,17,13,-1);ye(6187440,12,13,-1);ze(6187452,2341,183);ye(6187464,13,13,-1);ye(6187476,14,13,-1);Ae(6187488);we(6187500,21);we(6187512,23);we(6187524,21);ye(6187536,6,13,0);ze(6187548,179,176);ye(6187560,18,13,1);ze(6187572,-30664,177);ye(6187584,1,13,-1);Ce(6187596,0);Ae(6187608);Ae(6187620);ye(6187632,1,13,2);ze(6187644,0,2346);Ce(6187656,1);Fba(6187668,3);Ae(6187680);Ae(6187692);we(6187704,23);ye(6187716,30,13,3);ye(6187728,16,13,-1);Ae(6187740);Ae(6187752);xc(6313948,1,428,190,34,0,2,6187416,29);we(6197828,21);ye(6197840,17,13,-1);ye(6197852,12,13,0);ze(6197864,1805,183);ye(6197876,13,13,-1);ye(6197888,14,13,-1);Ae(6197900);we(6197912,21);we(6197924,23);ye(6197936,1,13,2);Ce(6197948,10);Hba(6197960,200,90);Fba(6197972,3);Ae(6197984);we(6197996,21);ye(6198008,6,13,1);ze(6198020,1814,1815);ye(6198032,1,13,-1);Be(6198044);Ce(6198056,0);Ae(6198068);Ae(6198080);Ae(6198092);we(6198104,23);ye(6198116,30,13,3);ye(6198128,16,13,-1);Ae(6198140);Ae(6198152);xc(6366212,1,300,210,71,0,0,6197828,28)})},{c:(function(){Iba();xc(6523164,2,0,0,61,0,2,6262368,140)})},{c:(function(){xb(6155704,-1);C[1566261]=27;C[1566262]=255;A[3132526]=0;C[1566264]=31;C[1566265]=1;C[1566266]=1;xc(6533728,0,0,0,0,0,0,6265044,2);Jba()})},{c:(function(){xb(6155664,-1);De(6285544,0);Ee(6285556,17,14,-1);Ee(6285568,12,14,-1);Fe(6285580,1816,183);Ee(6285592,15,14,-1);Ie(6285604);Ee(6285616,1,14,0);Ie(6285628);xc(6550252,1,0,0,15,0,0,6285544,8);De(6382688,0);Ee(6382700,17,14,-1);Ee(6382712,12,14,-1);Fe(6382724,1913,183);Ie(6382736);Ee(6382748,1,14,-1);Kba(6382760,4,2,4);Ee(6382772,8,14,-1);Fe(6382784,1914,0);Ee(6382796,8,14,-1);Fe(6382808,1915,0);Ee(6382820,11,14,-1);Lba(6382832,0,5,1,5);Ee(6382844,0,255,0);Ie(6382856);Ee(6382868,8,14,1);Fe(6382880,-30641,0);Ee(6382892,8,14,-1);Fe(6382904,1916,0);Ie(6382916);xc(6587772,2,0,0,87,0,0,6382688,20);Ee(6294292,1,14,0);Je(6294304,200,32);Ie(6294316);xc(6547548,0,0,0,10,0,0,6294292,3);De(6232508,0);Ee(6232520,17,14,-1);Ee(6232532,12,14,0);Fe(6232544,-30636,0);Ie(6232556);Ee(6232568,1,14,-1);Ee(6232580,19,14,1);Je(6232592,256,12);Mba(6232604);Lba(6232616,2,2,2,2);Ie(6232628);De(6232640,1);Ee(6232652,6,14,2);Je(6232664,87,12);Mba(6232676);Fe(6232688,192,0);Ee(6232700,6,14,3);Je(6232712,86,12);Mba(6232724);Fe(6232736,193,0);Ee(6232748,6,14,4);Je(6232760,87,12);Mba(6232772);Fe(6232784,194,0);Ie(6232796);xc(6517512,2,0,0,11,0,0,6232508,25);De(6381092,0);Ee(6381104,17,4,-1);Ee(6381116,12,4,0);Fe(6381128,-30664,0);Ie(6381140);Ee(6381152,1,4,-1);Kba(6381164,8,15,8);Ee(6381176,9,4,1);Je(6381188,200,12);De(6381200,1);Kba(6381212,20,29,20);Ee(6381224,134,3,2);Je(6381236,71,12);Fe(6381248,1178,0);Ee(6381260,134,3,3);Je(6381272,71,12);Fe(6381284,1177,0);Ie(6381296);Ie(6381308);xc(6586432,2,0,0,12,0,6,6381092,19)})},{c:(function(){Ke(6387132);C[1596783]=5978576;C[1596783]=5987384;Le(6387132,5279752,0,3);if(m){var b=M([]);$6$1=v;Me(6387132);m?(M([0]),$9$1=v,ad()):(0==C[T>>2]&&(C[T>>2]=b),a(b))}C[1596783]=5985060;ub(7702,6387132)})},{c:(function(){Nba();xc(6269464,1,0,0,86,0,2,6177916,59);Oba();xc(6519984,1,0,0,85,0,2,6235988,156)})},{c:(function(){Ke(6449624);C[1612406]=5978576;C[1612406]=5987412;Le(6449624,5308336,0,1);if(m){var b=M([]);$6$1=v;Me(6449624);m?

Page 42: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

asm.js

• Mozilla embraced Emscripten’s code generator output as a JS subset:

• arithmetic operations only

• loads and stores into a single ArrayBuffer

• calls to functions that only take numers and return number.

Page 43: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

asm.js• Force an expression to be double: “+x”

• Force an expression to be int: “x | 0”

function diagonal(x, y) { x = +x; // x has type double y = +y; // y has type double return +sqrt(square(x) + square(y));}

function add1(x) { x = x|0; // x : int return (x+1)|0;}

Page 44: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

asm.js

• It’s a statically typed language that only looks like JavaScript.

• No strings

• No allocation

• No calling of other JS libraries

Page 45: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Other LLVM based runtimes

• Let’s take a brief look at some single-language runtimes.

Page 46: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

• PyPy is Python runtime using LLVM.

• Has sandboxing, good memory management

• Has stackless mode (ever played EVE Online?)

• Itself largely written in Python!

Page 47: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi
Page 48: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

• Toolchain available as separate project RPython.

• Rpython is a statically compilable subset of Python

• Most of PyPy written in it.

• There’s now Topaz: a Ruby on top of PyPy!

• How crazy is that?!

Page 49: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

• A word on “stackless”

• Execution doesn’t use C stack

• Can have million of micro-threads executing as coroutines efficiently on few CPUs

• Very useful to program MMOs.

Page 50: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

• Similar to PyPy, only for Ruby:

• Big part of implementation written in Ruby itself

• Relies on LLVM to efficiently compile to Ruby

• Similar memory management etc. characteristics

Page 51: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

• Similar to JVM too:

• intermediate format is stack machine with bytecode

• has high level bytecodes for yield, pushing blocks etc.

Page 52: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

• Object representation:

• Has immediates for fixnums, symbols, booleans

• This can be huge deal performance-wise

• JVM-like objects (header, class pointer, fields)

• Generational GC, similar layout to JVM:

• Nursery, Young, Mature generations.

Page 53: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Self-hosting• Recurring theme is to write as much of the

runtime as possible in the runtime’s target language itself.

• More accessible for language users.

• Reduced bootstrapping core.

• Benefits from its own optimizations.

• Of course, old news in Lisp world.

Page 54: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Maxine VM• Speaking of self hosted VMs…

• Oracle’s open-sourced Java VM written in Java.

• Pluggable GC and JIT-compiler.

• “Maxine Inspector” for debugging/visualizing running VM state.

• Great tool for learning and research of VM technologies.

• Great IDE support (Eclipse, NetBeans, IntelliJ)

Page 55: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Maxine inspector

Page 56: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

JavaScript runtimes

• Probably biggest innovation hotbed right now.

• Google’s V8, Mozilla’s *Monkey, Apple’s Nitro

• … as well as Oracle’s Nashorn.

Page 57: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

JavaScript is ideal

• JavaScript is ideal language to get paid to work on it.

• Extreme dynamism ensures there’s no single correct optimization approach.

• Got to try them all!

Page 58: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

JS optimization strategies

• Type-specializing code generators

• Optimistic typing with on-stack code rewrite

• Allocation-site object shaping

• Static analysis (as far as it can go)

• Profiling-driven recompilation.

• Many more.

Page 59: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Summary• I love JVM. JVM is great. Lots of innovation going

on.

• There is life outside the JVM.

• I’m very enthusiastic for Parrot, PyPy, and Rubinius.

• Diversity of JS runtimes and their strategies for efficient execution is also great to watch and participate in.

• … especially if it means bringing back Transport Tycoon.

Page 60: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Summary

• As a general observation, commercial JVM technologies still have best memory management, observability/serviceability, and threading support.

• Not saying others won’t catch up, but HotSpot/JRockit/Azul/J9 etc. have a big lead in engineering effort poured into them.

• So, if you stay with JVM, you’re also in a very good place.

Page 61: The State of Managed Runtimes 2013, by Attila Szegedi

Image Credits

Machine: http://www.flickr.com/photos/38712296@N07/5264174576/

All used images are Creative Commons licensed, and used according to their terms of license.