The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the...

41
The Special Theory of Relativity

Transcript of The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the...

Page 1: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

The Special Theory of Relativity

Page 2: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Definition of an inertial reference frame:

One in which Newton’s first law is valid.

v=constant if F=0

Earth is rotating and therefore not an inertial reference frame,

but we can treat it as one for many purposes.

A frame moving with a constant velocity with respect to an inertial reference frame is itself inertial.

Galilean–Newtonian Relativity

Galileo Galilei Isaac Newton

Relativity principle:Laws of physics are the same in all inertial frames of reference

Page 3: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Lengths of objects are invariant as they move.

Time is absolute.

Mass of an object in invariant in for inertial system

Forces acting on a mass equal for all inertial frames

Velocities are (of course) different in inertial frames

Positions of objects are different in other inertial systems (coordinate transformation)

Intuitions of Galilean–Newtonian Relativity

Page 4: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Relativity principle: The basic laws of physics are the same in all inertial reference frames

20 2

1 tatvs rrr+=

Page 5: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

This principle works well for mechanical phenomena.

However, Maxwell’s equations yield the velocity of light; it is 3.0 x 108 m/s.

So, which is the reference frame in which light travels at that speed?

Scientists searched for variations in the speed of light depending on the direction of the ray, but found none.

Galilean–Newtonian Relativity

Page 6: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

This principle works well for mechanical phenomena.

There seems to be a problem with electrodynamic phenomena

Galilean–Newtonian Relativity

02

2

002 =

∂∂

−∇tEE εμ

James Clerk Maxwell

2

00

1 c=εμ

with

Light is a wave with transverse polarizationand speed c

Problems:In what inertial system has light the exact velocity cWhat about the other inertial systemsWaves are known to propagate in a medium; where is this “ether”Laws of electrodynamics do not fit the relativity principle ?

Page 7: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

The Michelson–Morley Experiment

smvEarth /103~ 4⋅

smc /103~ 8⋅

Albert Michelson

Edward Williams Morley

"for his optical precision instruments and the spectroscopic and metrological investigations carried out with their aid"

Nobel 1907

Albert Abraham Michelson

Questions:What is the absolute reference point of the Ether?In which direction does it move ? How fast ?

Ether connected to sun (center of the universe) ?

} 410~ −

cv Motion of the Earth

Should produce anObservable effect

Page 8: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

The Michelson–Morley Experiment

axis

( )22222

2 /12

cvcvcvct

−=

−+

+=

lll

Page 9: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

The Michelson–Morley Experiment

221

2211

1/1

22'

2cvcvcv

t−

=−

==lll

axis

Page 10: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

The Michelson–Morley Experiment

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

−−

−==−=Δ

222212/1

1/1

12cvcvc

ttt l

221

2211

1/1

22'

2cvcvcv

t−

=−

==lll

( )22222

2 /12

cvcvcvct

−=

−+

+=

lll

Interferometer: 21 lll ==If v=0, then Δt=0

no effect on interferometer

If v≠0, then Δt≠0a phase-shift introduced

But this is not observed

Page 11: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

The Michelson–Morley Experiment

( ) ⎥⎦

⎤⎢⎣

−−

−+

=Δ−Δ=Δ

222221/1

1/1

12

'

cvcvc

ttT

ll

21 ll ↔

1<<cv

Rotate the interferometer

Approximate:

Then:2

2

22 1/1

1cv

cv+≈

2

2

22 211

/11

cv

cv+≈

( ) 3

2

21 cvT ll +=Δ

Numbers:v~3x104 m/sv/s~10-4

l1~l2~11 m

sT 16107 −×=Δ

Visible light: λ~550 nm f~5 x 1014 Hz

Phase change (in fringes)

4.0105107 1416 =×⋅×=Δ⋅ −Tf

Should be observable !

Detactability: 0.01 fringe

Page 12: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Conclusion: The Michelson–Morley Experiment

This interferometer was able to measure interference shifts as small as 0.01 fringe, while the expected shift was 0.4 fringe.

However, no shift was ever observed, no matter how the apparatus was rotated or what time of day or night the measurements were made.

The possibility that the arms of the apparatus became slightly shortened when moving against the ether was considered, but a full explanation had to wait until Einstein came into the picture.

Hendrik A LorentzNobel 1902

"in recognition of the extraordinary service rendered by their researches into the influence of magnetism upon radiation phenomena"

Lorentz contraction

Page 13: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Albert Einstein

A new perspective

Page 14: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Albert Einstein

On relativity

Page 15: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

1. The laws of physics have the same form in all inertial reference frames

2. Light propagates through empty space with speed cindependent of the speed of source or observer

This solves the ether problem –

the speed of light is the same in all inertial reference frames

Postulates of the Special Theory of Relativity

Page 16: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

One of the implications of relativity theory is that time is not absolute. Distant observers do not necessarily agree on time intervals between events, or on whether they are simultaneous or not.

Why not?

In relativity, an “event” is defined as occurring at a specific place and time. Let’s see how different observers would describe a specific event.

Simultaneity

Page 17: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Thought experiment: lightning strikes at two separate places. One observer believes the events are simultaneous – the light has taken the same time to reach her – but another, moving with respect to the first, does not.

Simultaneity

Page 18: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Simultaneity

From the perspective of both O1 and O2 theythemselves see both light flashes at the same time

From the perspective of O2 the observer O1

sees the light flashesfrom the right (B) first.

Who is right ?

Page 19: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Here, it is clear that if one observer sees the events as simultaneous, the other cannot, given that the speed of light is the same for each.

Simultaneity

Conclusions:Simultaneity is not an absolute conceptTime is not an absolute concept

Page 20: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

This shows that moving observers must disagree on the passage of time.

Time Dilation

ttvD

tDc

ΔΔ+

=Δ+

=4/22 22222 l

cDt 2

0 =Δ

tvΔ=l2

a) Observer in space ship

b) Observer on Earthspeed c is the sameapparent distance longer

Light along diagonal

22 /12

cvcDt

−=Δ

0220

/1t

cvtt Δ=

Δ=Δ γ

proper time

Clocks moving relative to an observer run more slowly

Page 21: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Calculating the difference between clock “ticks,” we find that the interval in the moving frame is related to the interval in the clock’s rest frame:

Time Dilation

Δt0 is ther proper time (in the co-moving frame)It is the shortest time an observer can measure

.thenwith

Page 22: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

On Space Travel

100 light years ~ 1016 m

If space ship travels at v=0.999 cthen it takes ~100 years to travel.

But in the rest frame of the carrier:

yrcvtt 5.4/1 220 ≈−Δ=Δ

The higher the speed the faster you get there;But not from our frame perspective !

Page 23: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

The twin paradox – if any inertial frame is just as good as any other, why doesn’t the astronaut age faster than the Earth traveling away from him?

Twin Paradox

The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial – he turns around at some point and comes back.

Page 24: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Length Contraction

0l vt 0l=Δ

0tvΔ=l

Distance between planets is: Time for travel: Earth observer

Time dilatation

γtcvtt Δ

=−Δ=Δ 220 /1

Space craft observersmeasure the samespeed but less time γ

0ll =

Page 25: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Length Contraction

Only observed in the direction of the motion.

No contraction, or dilatation in perpendicular direction

Page 26: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Fantasy supertrain

A very fast train with a proper length of 500 m is passing through a 200-m-long tunnel. Let us imagine the train’s speed to be so great that the train fits completely within the tunnel as seen by an observer at rest on the Earth. That is, the engine is just about to emerge from one end of the tunnel at the time the last car disappears into the other end. What is the train’s speed?

Page 27: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Galilean Transformations

A classical (Galilean) transformation between inertial reference frames:

View coordinates of point P in system S’

Page 28: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Lorentz Transformations

( )vtxx −= γ'

( ) ( ) ( ) ''''' tvcvtctvtxctx +=+=+=≡ γγγ

( ) ( ) ( )tvcvtctvtxctx −=−=−=≡ γγγ''

In relativity, assume a linear transformation:

γ as a constant to be determined (γ=1 classically).Inverse transformation with v -v

Consider light pulse at common origin of S and S’ at t=t’=0measure the distance in x=ct and x’=ct’ :

( )tcvct −

= γ'

Transformation parameter

fill in

Page 29: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Lorentz Transformations

Solve further:

.

Time dilatation and length contraction can be derivedFrom these Lorentz transformations

( ) ( )( )vtvtxvtxx −+=−= ''' γγγ

Leading to the transformations:

Page 30: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Lorentz TransformationsLorentz transformation length contraction

time dilation.

Velocity transformations can be found by differentiating x, y, and z with respect to time.

v is the velocity between the reference frames

Note that also uy and uz

transform; this has to do withthe transformation (non-absoluteness) of time

Verify that c is maximum speed

0'≠

dtdt

Page 31: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Galilean and Lorentz Transformations

Calculate the speed of rocket 2 with respect to Earth.

c

cvuvuu 88.0'1

'

2

=+

+=

This equation also yields asresult that c is the maximumobtainable speed (in anyframe).

Page 32: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Relativistic Momentum

The formula for relativistic momentum can be derived by requiring that the conservation of momentum during collisions remain valid in all inertial reference frames.

Note: that does NOTmean that the momentum is equal in different reference frames

Result

Page 33: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Relativistic Force

Newtons second law remains valid (without proof)

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

−===

22 /1 cvvm

dtdvm

dtd

dtpdF

rr

rrγ

1) For every physical law it has to be established how theytransform in relativity (under Lorentz transformations)2) Quatities (like F) not the same in reference frames

Page 34: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Gamma and the rest mass are combined to form the relativistic mass:

Relativistic Mass

From the momentum:

Page 35: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Relativistic EnergyWork done to increase the speed of a particle from v=0 (i-state) to v=v (f state):

( ) ∫∫∫∫∫∫ −=====f

i

f

i

f

i

f

i

f

i

f

ipdvpvdvdpvdt

dtdpdx

dtdpFdxW because pdvpvdvdp −= )(

( ) ( )vmvpvpvd fi

f

iγ==∫

( ) 222

22 /1//1 cvcvcv

dvd

−⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛−=−

use

2222

0

222

0 22/1/1

/1mccvmccvmcdv

cv

mvpdvvvf

i−−=−=

−−=− ∫∫

So:

( ) ( ) 22222

22

2 1 mcmccvmcmcmvW −=−+

=−+= γγ

γγ

γ

Kinetic energy of the particle is

( ) 21 mcK −= γ1) Amount of kineticenergy depends on inertial frame

2) Amount of kineticenergy reduces to classical value at low v

Page 36: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Mass and Energy

The kinetic energy ( ) 21 mcK −= γ

Can be written as the total energy:

Where the difference is the rest energy:

The last equation is Einstein famous equationimplying thast mass is equivalent to energyThe energy of a particle at rest.

Note that mc2 is the same as seen from all reference frames;It is an invariant upon frame transformation

Page 37: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Combining these relations gives

Mass, Energy, Momentum

mvp γ=2mcE γ=Energy Momentum

Hence also the followingIs an invariant under Lorentztransformations

222 cpE −

Page 38: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Doppler Shift for Light

000 / fctc =Δ=λ

tvtc Δ−Δ=λ

220 /1 cvtt −Δ=Δ

The Doppler shift for light for c=constant in all inertial frames.

Time dilatation between wave fronts

( ) ( )vcvc

cv

tvctvc+−

=−

Δ−=Δ−= 022

0

/1λλ

When source moving toward observer

Page 39: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Doppler Shift for LightHence, one can derive the observed frequency and wavelength:

If the source and observer are moving away from each other, v changes sign.

Remember: higher pitch, blue shift when moving toward each other

Page 40: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Doppler Shift for Light

Speeding through a red light.

A driver claims that he did not go through a red light because the light was Doppler shifted and appeared green. Calculate the speed of a driver in order for a red light to appear green.

λ = 500nm ; λ0 =650 nm

v = 0.26 c

Page 41: The Special Theory of Relativitywimu/EDUC/WU_Lecture_Ch36.pdfTwin Paradox The solution to the paradox is that the astronaut’s reference frame has not been continuously inertial –

Red Shifts in the Universe

Edwin Hubble

Cosmological redshiftz+≡10λλ

Galaxies moving away from each other

Expansion of the universe

Big bang as starting point