The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access
Transcript of The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access
![Page 1: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Spaces Between Us: Setting and Maintaining Boundaries in Wireless
Spectrum AccessSpectrum AccessMobiCom ‘10MobiCom 10
Lei Yang, Ben Y. Zhao, Haitao Zheng
![Page 2: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OutlineOutline
• Background• MotivationMotivation• Proposed Solution‐ Ganache• Model Estimation, Verification and Calibration• Interference DetectionInterference Detection• Evaluation• Conclusion
![Page 3: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Trends in 802 11aTrends in 802.11a
• OFDM scheme:‐Orthogonal wireless channelsOrthogonal wireless channels‐Crossband Interference
• Fixed Size Guardband:‐20 MHz channel bandwidth20 MHz channel bandwidth‐3.4 MHz guardband between channels‐17% Overhead
![Page 4: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Crossband Interference in 802 11aCrossband Interference in 802.11a
3 4 MH 20% f li k A 75% f li k B•3.4 MHz: 20% for link A; 75% for link B•Carrier Sensing Off: from 80% to 65%•Significant Impact from “Guardband Size”
![Page 5: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
USRP GNU RadioUSRP GNU Radio
• Software‐define radio• Flexible to design desired frequency usageFlexible to design desired frequency usage with OFDM scheme
![Page 6: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Crossband Interference in Different Topology
1 2
![Page 7: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Brief SummaryBrief Summary
• Cross‐band Interference is Harmful• Fixed‐sized Guardband Placement isFixed sized Guardband Placement is IneffectiveWh i h b fi db d• What is the best way to configure guardbandfor today’s high density networks?
![Page 8: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Most Common SolutionsMost Common Solutions
i k d i• Link Adaptation‐significant reduction in power efficiencyg p y
• Carrier Sensingdelay transmissions waste spectrum‐delay transmissions waste spectrum
• Power Control‐lower power link becomes vulnerable
• Interference CancellationInterference Cancellation‐complexity, tight synchronization
![Page 9: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
GanacheGanache
• Centralized Frequency Planning• Local Guardband AdaptationLocal Guardband Adaptation
![Page 10: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
The Relationship Between Network Condition and Guardband Size
![Page 11: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Model Verification and CalibrationModel Verification and Calibration
• Find the minimum guardband size to suppress the impact of interferencep
![Page 12: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Key ObservationsKey Observations
• Local Information Is Not Enough
• A Case for Reducing Power Heterogeneity
![Page 13: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Centralized Frequency PlanningCentralized Frequency Planning
• Phase 1. Signal Measurements‐compute directly from physical layer symbolscompute directly from physical layer symbols
• Phase 2. Frequency Planning‐NP‐complete: Traveling Salesman Problem
![Page 14: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Adapting Guardband UsageAdapting Guardband Usage
i b d f• Detecting Cross‐band Interference
• Local Adjustments‐increase one additional subcarrier ifincrease one additional subcarrier if crossband interference detected
![Page 15: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
A Ganache PrototypeA Ganache Prototype
h i l• Physical Layer‐decentralized OFDM‐500KHz is divided into 64 subcarriers with at most 52 subcarriers for data transmission
• Access Layer‐server to GNU radios: Ethernet‐server to GNU radios: Ethernet‐sender/receiver handshaking for sync
b d i‐crossband assertion: edge distortion > 3 * average distortion
![Page 16: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
EvaluationEvaluation
f i li d• Performance Metrics: Normalized Impact‐ 1 – (the ratio of per‐link throughput to ideal ( p g pthroughput)
• Five SchemesFive Schemes‐Uni‐Cons: 22 subcarriers for each guardband
b f h b‐Uni‐Aggr: 2 subcarriers for each guardband‐Model: compute guardband valuep g‐C‐Planning: centralized planningGanache‐Ganache
![Page 17: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Ganache vs Fixed size ConfigurationGanache vs. Fixed‐size Configuration
• Topology 1 (Heterogeneous trans. power)
• Topology 2 (Heterogeneous link attenuation)Topology 2 (Heterogeneous link attenuation)
![Page 18: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Impact of Individual ComponentsImpact of Individual Components
• Model‐based Guardband Estimations‐50+% improvement for both topologies50+% improvement for both topologies
• Frequency Planning• Local Adaption
![Page 19: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Cross band Interference DetectionCross‐band Interference Detection
• False Positives: detecting normal impairments as cross‐band interference
• False Negative: failing to detect cross‐band interferenceinterference
![Page 20: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Overall EfficiencyOverall Efficiency
• Heterogeneity in transmit power settings• 20 randomly generated 4‐link topologies20 randomly generated 4 link topologies
![Page 21: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Related WorkRelated Work
• Spectrum Sharing Systems• Cross‐band Interference in WiFiCross band Interference in WiFi• Adaptive Guard Interval• Using Physical Layer Hints
![Page 22: The Spaces Between Us: Setting and in Spectrum Access](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022051909/6284b1b8ecf6b51d7f5c40fb/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
ConclusionConclusion
• The impact of cross‐band interference on high density networksy
• Ineffective using fixed‐size guardbandsP G h• Prototype Ganache
• 150% throughput improvementg p p• Limitation‐mobility