The Soft Cells: Qualitative approaches to research HLG Conference: Parallel Session 4 20th July 2010...
-
Upload
isabel-preston -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of The Soft Cells: Qualitative approaches to research HLG Conference: Parallel Session 4 20th July 2010...
The Soft Cells:Qualitative approaches to research
HLG Conference: Parallel Session 4
20th July 2010
Dr.Janet Harrison, Loughborough University
Hannah Spring, York St. John University
The Research Paradigm
• Two overarching research paradigms• Qualitative• Quantitative
• The two paradigms take opposing views in terms of how the world around us should be explored through research
Research Paradigm
• How to make the right choice of paradigm?
• Difficult and complex decision
• Takes discussion, understanding and time to get it right
What will my research look like?
What will my research look like?
What will my research sound like?
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gSr32dY8ApA
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xx8l5l1g0wA
Quantitative and Qualitative Research: differences
Some common contrasts between quantitative and qualitative research
Quantitative Qualitative
Numbers Words
Point of view of researcher Point of view of participants
Research distance Researcher close
Theory testing Theory emergent
Static Process
Structured Unstructured
Generalization Contextual understanding
Hard, reliable data Rich, deep data
Macro Micro
Behaviour Meaning
Artificial settings Natural settings
Table from: Bryman, A (2004) Social research methods (2nd ed) Oxford: OUP, p287
As applied to data collection first phase (focus group)
Some common contrasts between quantitative and qualitative research
Quantitative Qualitative
Numbers Words
Point of view of researcher Point of view of participants
Research distance Researcher close
Theory testing Theory emergent
Static Process
Structured Unstructured
Generalization Contextual understanding
Hard, reliable data Rich, deep data
Macro Micro
Behaviour Meaning
Artificial settings Natural settings
Table taken from: Bryman, A (2004) Social research methods (2nd ed) Oxford: OUP, p287
Some common contrasts between quantitative and qualitative research
Quantitative Qualitative
Numbers Words
Point of view of researcher Point of view of participants
Research distance Researcher close
Theory testing Theory emergent
Static Process
Structured Unstructured
Generalization Contextual understanding
Hard, reliable data (?) Rich, deep data
Macro Micro
Behaviour Meaning
Artificial settings Natural settings
Table taken from: Bryman, A (2004) Social research methods (2nd ed) Oxford: OUP, p287
As applied to data collection second phase (survey)
Focus Group: example from a live research project
• Sample group (7 areas of health librarianship)– Clinical librarians– Health library service managers and professionally
qualified librarians– Senior strategic health librarians/managers– Academic health librarians– Research librarians– Independent health librarians– Academics (added later at survey stage)
• Interested in exploring the issues from different perspectives
Phase 2: Focus Group
• Results
• Barriers– Time– Fragmentation– Research skills– Marketing– Prioritisation– Funding– Networking
Phase 2: Focus Group
• Results
• Priorities– Networking– Training of users– Marketing of services– Service delivery– Delivery of evidence– Identifying research questions– Research skills– Management of research– Research impact
Theme
CodesThematic Analysis
Summary
• Qualitative research is not a soft option
• Requires ability to want to explore the worlds and words of “ others”
• Values the non conformist and unusual
• Acceptance that an definitive answer may not exist