The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

27
The Sea Level Projections of USACE EC 1165-2-211 in Context Kris Esterson & Sergey Gorlachev Everglades Project Joint Venture GEER 2010 Greater Everglades Ecosystem Restoration The Greater Everglades: A Living Laboratory of Change July 14, 2010

description

Sea level rise projections of USACE EC 1165-2-211 in greater context.

Transcript of The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

Page 1: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

The Sea Level Projections of USACE EC 1165-2-211 in Context

Kris Esterson & Sergey GorlachevEverglades Project Joint Venture

GEER 2010Greater Everglades Ecosystem RestorationThe Greater Everglades: A Living Laboratory of ChangeJuly 14, 2010

Page 2: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010
Page 3: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

OVERVIEW OF PRESENTATION

How are SLR projections are developed using USACE guidance (EC 1165-2-211)?

EC projections in the context of:

•Latest scientific literature on sea level rise•Other projections in use in the region•Related climate change effects•Role in decision support

Page 4: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

HOW ARE THE PROJECTIONS DEVELOPED?

Page 5: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

Naples Tide Station Record

Record exceeds 40yr minimum

Page 6: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010
Page 7: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

High Rate Contribution (standard worldwide)

Intermediate Rate Contribution (standard worldwide)

Page 8: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010
Page 9: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

EC’s projections connected to orthometric and tidal datums

Page 10: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS IN THE

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE

Page 11: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

Responding to Changes in Sea Level:

Engineering Implications

NRC, 1987

The source of the EC’s

High and Intermediate

Curves

Page 12: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

Sea Level Projections from the Literature

1.43m

0.18m

USACE EC 1165-2-211For Naples, FL

From Rahmstorf (2010)

Page 13: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

OTHER PROJECTION METHODOLOGIES

Page 14: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

2050 2100

0 ft

6 ft

1.09’ (34cm) for 2100 (Yellow Book, 1999)

3 ft

1.7’ by 2100 (CGM 16, 2004)

2030

?

?

2 ft

1 ft

4 ft

5 ft

2000

SFRPC 10% Worst Case

SFRPC 50% Moderate Case

SFRPC 90% Least Case

SLR Projections & Planning Standards for South Florida

>1.5’ for ~2059 (Miami-Dade., 2009)

0.5’ SFWMD Sensitivity Test (Trimble, 1998)

0.48’ (15cm) for 2050 (Yellow Book, 1999)

EC 11

65-2

-211

High

EC 1165-2-211 Intermediate

>3-5’ for ~2100 (Miami-Dade., 2009)

0.8’ by 2050 (CGM 16, 2004)

2.1” to 1’ for 2030 (Broward Co., 2009)

EC 1165-2-211 Historic

NRC 2nd Biennial Review (2008) “not much more than 3 feet”

?

Page 15: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010
Page 16: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS SCENARIOS

Page 17: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

Drivers Stressors Impacts

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

CO2Ocean

Acidification

Sea Level Rise

Hurricane Intensity

Precipitation Change

Increased Global

Temperature

Impacts to Natural and

Built Environments

Typical SLR Impact Assessment

Page 18: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

Drivers Stressors Impacts

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

CO2Ocean

Acidification

Sea Level Rise

Hurricane Intensity

Precipitation Change

Increased Global

Temperature

Impacts to Natural and

Built Environments

Exploring Causation

Page 19: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

What GHG emissions scenario would produce this SLR?

Page 20: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

Actual Emissions vs IPCC SRES Scenarios

Raupach et al. 2007, PNAS, updated; Le Quéré et al. 2009, Nature Geoscience; International Monetary Fund 2009

1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Fo

ssil

Fu

el E

mis

sio

n (

GtC

y-1)

5

6

7

8

9

10

A1B

A1FI

A1T

A2

B1

B2

Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center

International Energy Agency

EC “High” SLR Projection

EC “Intermediate”

EC “Historic”

Source: Global Carbon Project

Page 21: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

RELATED EFFECTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE

Page 22: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

What other climate change effects are related to this SLR scenario?

Page 23: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

Drivers Stressors Impacts

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

CO2Ocean

Acidification

Sea Level Rise

Hurricane Intensity

Precipitation Change

Increased Global

Temperature

Impacts to Natural and

Built Environments

What Climate Effects are Associated with a “High” SLR Scenario?

Accelerated SLR cannot occur in a vacuum

Page 24: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

UTILITY AND LIMITATIONS IN DECISION SUPPORT

Page 25: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

EC’s Projections & Decision Support

Scenarios- End of academic process and start of decision support.

Scenarios- Three scenarios with equal chance of occurrence.

Not probabilistic- No “most likely” projection. Not predictions/forecasts- They bound rather than hide

uncertainty. Multiple futures rather than single line forecasts.

No information on “surprises”- Smooth projections don’t describe potential surprises such as leaps in the rate of rise

Page 26: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

EC’s Projections & Decision Support

Not probabilistic- Makes traditional risk assessment unclear. Calculation of traditional risk requires probabilities.

Not predictions/forecasts- Makes cost-benefit analysis difficult as benefits may vary depending on SLR scenario. Complicates engineering design.

No information on “surprises”- Management strategies (AM, SBP) based on SLR projections may not fully incorporate the range of potential outcomes.

Page 27: The Sea Level Projections Of USACE EC 1165-2-211 GEER 2010

Questions?