The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale...
-
Upload
rosemary-daniels -
Category
Documents
-
view
214 -
download
0
Transcript of The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale...
![Page 1: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009)
Sabatino SofiaYale UniversityNew Haven, CT, USA
![Page 2: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The SDS is a balloon-borne metrologic instrument that measures the SOLAR DIAMETER AND ASPHERICITY
It has flown in Fall 1992, 1994, 1995, 1996, and 2009 from Fort Sumner, NM
Future flights, especially connected with PICARD, are being considered.
![Page 3: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
RESEARCH TEAM
American University (U.J. Sofia)
CNRS/S.d’A (G. Thuillier, D. Djafer)
CSA (Stella Melo)
NASA/GSFC (W. Heaps, L. Twigg, E. Georgieva)
Yale University (S. Sofia)
![Page 4: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
SDS Principle
![Page 5: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Optical System
The stability of the optics needed by thisinstrument is of the level commonly used inoptical interferometry. For this reason, theballoon flight version currently utilizessimilar techniques (molecular bonding) andmaterials (quartz and Zerodur). Thus theoptics consist of:
1. beam splitting wedge,2. Cassegrainian telescope,3. relay lens to achieve the required
focal length, and4. detector support.
![Page 6: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The Beam Splitting Wedge
The wedge consists of two fused silica flatsseparated by an annular silica ring polishedto an angle of about 1000 arc-s. Molecularcontact bonding is used to hold the assemblyin alignment. The surfaces are flat to 1/50wave at 630 nm and have dielectric coatingsto define the bandpass and reduce the solartransmission to an acceptable level. Themirrored surfaces have a high reflectivity (R>.9) so that the intensities of the two imagesare approximately in the ratio of 5:4.
![Page 7: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
The Telescope
A 17.8 cm aperture ruggedized Questartelescope is used with a reduced apertureof 12.7 cm to accommodate the effectivewedge aperture, and has a focal length of2.5 m. Its optical elements are made offused silica and Zerodur, and the mainbody and mounting parts are made ofInvar to minimize thermal effects.
![Page 8: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
The Relay Lens
To provide the plate scale to match theresolution of available Charge CoupledDevice (CCD) detector elements, amagnification of the image is required. Amagnification by a factor of 8 isprovided by a multi-element Barlowlens, to an effective focal length of 20 m.
A NEW OPTICALLY CONTACTEDBARLOW LENS IS IN FABRI CATION,SUPPORTED BY CNES
![Page 9: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
The Detectors
The CCDs are mounted on a ceramiccircuit board with a thermal coefficient ofexpansion near that of the CCD cases anda high thermal conductivity.
The CCDs are Texas Instrument virtualphase 1728 element devices having pixeldimensions of 12.7 x 12.7 microns. Abandpass filter provides the properwavelength of light to match the solarinput. This system provides a resolutionof 0.11 arc s per pixel.
![Page 10: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
S = (D – d)/F = W (1 – d/D)
![Page 11: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Differences between existing diameter measurements
• Ground-based vs. space based• Wavelength of observation• Analysis Method• Calibration
These issues are extensively described in a paper byDjafer, Thuillier and Sofia, ApJ, 676, 651, 2008.
![Page 12: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Ground-based measurements are affected by terrestrial atmosphere
Seeing is 1”-4”, and we need sensitivity of mas.This cannot be simply solved by statistics, since atmospheric turbulence is not random.
![Page 13: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Once you go to space, there are 2 measurements:
SoHO/MDI
SDS
SoHO/MDI is not a metrologic instrument. It has not been calibrated before launch, and cannot be calibrated in space.
The only metrologic instrument to measure the solar diameter is the SDS.
![Page 14: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
![Page 15: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
![Page 16: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The MDI results claim an accuracy of a few mas. over more than a decade
This is equivalent to knowing the effective focal length to an accuracy of a few microns over this time period.
The instrument is frequently refocused.Large corrections are made through “characterization”i.e. on the basis of a “thermal model” not calibrated beforeflight.There are corrections for agingEtc.
![Page 17: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
The previous corrections are made in addition to distance corrections that are well understood.
By contrast, the SDS can separate instrumental changes (regardless of its origin) from changes of the solar diameter.
PICARD can calibrate scale in two separate ways:
Stellar pairsWedges (similar to SDS)
![Page 18: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Philosophical difference:
SDS-PICARD: We determine the scale (arc sec/mm) and its changes regardless of the cause.
MDI, RHESSI *, etc: They correct for each known instrumental process, and assume the rest is solar change.
* RHESSI only claims accuracy for the asphericity determination.
![Page 19: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Determining the solar diameter is a complex process
When we look at the image of the Sun obtained in any detector, we do not see the Sun, but an image obtainedthrough a typically complex optical system.
Besides the peculiar solar issues described earlier, we also have general optical distortion effects that we have long ago learned from stellar astrometry
![Page 20: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
ORIGIN OF PRINCIPAL OPTICAL DISTORTION
TILT OF THE DETECTOR PLANECOLORCHARGE TRANSFER EFFECTCLASSICAL DISTORTION COMAPOSSIBLE CROSS TERMS
![Page 21: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
subtract background level
read data (HK+CCD)
apply photometric coefs
preliminary edge detection
subtract ghost images
get next cycle filename
final edge detection
transform to focal-plane x,y
correct for distortion
fit direct & reflected circles
find minimum gap
output gap, sep, Rd, Rr, etc.
odd/even offset & spike filter
flight-cycle filename list
output relevant HK
“New” Yale SDS Flight Data Reduction Pipeline
distortion coefs
photom. coefs
PDS xy's of CCDs
![Page 22: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
normalize to 1 AU
cull/average by rotation angle
correct for refraction
cycle#, gap, sep, Rd, Rr, etc.
output diameter & oblateness
“New” Yale SDS Flight Data Reduction Pipeline(cont.)
cycle#, HK (time, rotat., etc)
Output from program #1 becomes input for program #2:
![Page 23: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
When you need sensitivity of 1 part in 106, and very complex analysis procedures, you run the risk that the results reflect the method rather than the object measured.
The incompatible results claimed by different authors regarding the solar diameter confirm this.
WE NEED TO PROCESS THE DATA TO THE POINTOF PRODUCING THE DIAMETER, AND THEN PUBLISH IT AS SOON AS POSSIBLE FOR THE BROAD SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY TO EXPLORE ITS IMPLICATIONS
![Page 24: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
![Page 25: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
![Page 26: The SDS, and Variations of the Solar Diameter: Flight 11 (October 16, 2009) Sabatino Sofia Yale University New Haven, CT, USA.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062518/56649f115503460f94c23dfe/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
SDS/PICARD SYNERGY
PICARD measurements are complex, and their analysis is very demanding.
Analyzing the SDS data obtained before the PICARD launch has assisted development and testing of the PICARD algorithms. This has accelerated PICARD science productivity.
The 2009 SDS flight, added to the earlier and the proposedfollow up flights during and after PICARD will enhance the science value of the mission by:
Providing validation of measurementsAllowing normalization of past resultsAllowing the extension of the PICARD mission beyond itslifetime.