The scientific study of disease distribution and

32

description

The scientific study of disease distribution and the factors that cause diseases to spread in communities. Analyze the facts Educate others Build partnership Lend their perspectives Raise critical questions Seek knowledge. The number of people living with HIV/AIDS during a given year. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The scientific study of disease distribution and

Page 1: The scientific study of disease distribution and
Page 2: The scientific study of disease distribution and

The scientific study of disease distribution and the factors that cause diseases to spread in communities

Page 3: The scientific study of disease distribution and

• Analyze the facts• Educate others• Build partnership• Lend their perspectives• Raise critical questions• Seek knowledge

Page 4: The scientific study of disease distribution and
Page 5: The scientific study of disease distribution and

The number of people living with HIV/AIDS during a given year

In 2006, an estimated 1,106,400 individuals were living with HIV/AIDS in the United States

Page 6: The scientific study of disease distribution and

In 2006, an estimated 56,300 individuals became HIV infected in the U.S.

The annual number of people who become HIV infected in a given period of time, typically a year.

Page 7: The scientific study of disease distribution and

A rate measures a certain quantity or amount of one thing considered in relation to a unit of another thing.

In public health, rates help describe the number of events per population unit,

typically expressed as health events or disease per 100,000

people.

Page 8: The scientific study of disease distribution and

A rate consists of a numerator and a denominator.

525,600 / 56,300 = 9.33

Annual minutes (numerator) divided by annual infections (denominator) equals a rate of 9 ½ minutes per infection

Page 9: The scientific study of disease distribution and

Rates allow us to compare communities of different sizes.

The numerator is the number of health events or disease

and the denominator is the defined population at risk

(including those who experience the event/disease):

numerator ____________ x 100,000 = population rate denominator

Page 10: The scientific study of disease distribution and
Page 11: The scientific study of disease distribution and

Based on meta-analysis, CDC estimates that:

•An estimated 4% of U.S. males had same-sex behavior in the past 5 yrs•7% of U.S. males have ever had MSM behavior•MSM account for an estimated 2% of the total U.S. population

Page 12: The scientific study of disease distribution and
Page 13: The scientific study of disease distribution and
Page 14: The scientific study of disease distribution and

CDC notes and disclaimers:

• These estimates are preliminary!

• More complete analysis – Refine meta-analysis estimates

– Re-calculate rates; also do by race and age – May conduct separate analysis for young MSM

• Identify population estimates for IDU and HET

Page 15: The scientific study of disease distribution and

Transmission Rate:Represents the amount of transmission that occurs annually in relation to the population infected with HIV.

Technically, this is HIV incidence divided by

prevalence in a given year.

Page 16: The scientific study of disease distribution and

CDC published in 2008 back-calculation estimates for HIV incidence and prevalence between 1977 and 2006. The new estimates allow retrospective TR calculations.

Hall et al. JAMA. 2008; 300: 520- 529.

HIV Transmission Rate (TR)

Page 17: The scientific study of disease distribution and

HIV Transmission Rate, United States, 1977-2006

0.00

20.00

40.00

60.00

80.00

100.00

120.00

Year

Source: Holtgrave et al. JAIDS 2009

HIV Transmission Rate, United States, 1977-2006

Page 18: The scientific study of disease distribution and

HIV Transmission Rate, United States, 1990-2006

0.00

2.00

4.00

6.00

8.00

10.00

12.00

14.00

1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006

Year

Source: Holtgrave et al. JAIDS 2009

HIV Transmission Rate, United States, 1977-2006

Page 19: The scientific study of disease distribution and

• What are the characteristics of people who become infected with HIV?

• How do we understand population trends in the epidemic?

Page 20: The scientific study of disease distribution and
Page 21: The scientific study of disease distribution and
Page 22: The scientific study of disease distribution and
Page 23: The scientific study of disease distribution and
Page 24: The scientific study of disease distribution and
Page 25: The scientific study of disease distribution and

Research advocates ask critical questions:

•Do the data give an accurate picture of the epidemic?

•Where/when/how was data collected?

•What methodologies were employed in data collection, analysis, and presentation?

•Who was involved?

•How might disease surveillance be improved?

Page 26: The scientific study of disease distribution and

Change HIV/AIDS Surveillance System Categories to More Accurately Reflect How Women Acquire HIV, Advocates Say

•End the “seriously flawed” CDC hierarchical classification system that classifies most cases of HIV among women as “no identified risk”•Allow health departments to classify cases as “presumed heterosexual” when the male partner’s HIV status and/or risk factors are unknown•Collect “acquisition category” information to reflect “sexual networks and/or social networks” of elevated HIV prevalence. New data might include:

– Prevalence of HIV where the person lives– The area’s post-incarceration rates– Drug/alcohol and homelessness partners for the area

ms.foundation.org/File%20Library/NWAC/NWACpolicypropchartformFINALforweb.pdf

Page 27: The scientific study of disease distribution and

Advocates Say Outreach and Surveillance Programs Undercount:

• Transgender populations• Asian/Pacific Islanders• Undocumented people• American Indians/Native Hawaiians• Rural populations

Without accurate surveillance, undercounted populations may receive fewer dollars for HIV prevention, care, and research activities

Page 28: The scientific study of disease distribution and

Person Living with AIDS in 2005 By Region

Region Rank Number

North 2 126,867

Midwest 4 45,666

South 1 169,972

West 3 83,405

http://www.southernaidscoalition.org/policy/southern_states_manifesto_2008.pdf

Page 29: The scientific study of disease distribution and

San Francisco Project maps concentration of HIV viral load across the city to determine where expanded services are needed

Page 30: The scientific study of disease distribution and

To alter the course of the epidemic, We need to model where it is currently headed

Advocates shared a model with the White House comparing stable growth in the epidemic against progress toward defined goals

They call on the federal government to include a scientifically rigorous model in the National HIV/AIDS Strategy

The paper includes other important recommendations

nationalaidsstrategy.org/2010/advocates-recommend-key-components-of-an-effective-strategy/

Page 31: The scientific study of disease distribution and

Year Incidence Deaths Prevalence Minutes per Infection

2006 56,300 18,620 1,106,400 9.302007 58,086 19,000 1,145,486 9.00

2008 62,273 20,876 1,186,151 8.30

2009 62,273 20,876 1,227,548 8.00

2010 64,446 21,605 1,270,389 8.002011 66,695 22,359 1,314,726 7.30

2012 69,023 23,139 1,360,610 7.30

2013 71,432 23,947 1,408,095 7.30

2014 73,505 24,782 1,457,238 7.00

2015 76,505 25,647 1,508,095 7.002016 79,175 26,542 1,560,728 6.30

2007-2016 Projected Epidemic Based on A Constant 5% Transmission Rate

Page 32: The scientific study of disease distribution and

David Ernesto MunarVice President

AIDS Foundation of Chicago312-334-0933

[email protected]

aidsconnect.net/dose