The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

25
The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas

Transcript of The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

Page 1: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

The Road to Civil War

Part 3

Bloodshed in Kansas

Page 2: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

The Compromise of 1850 didn’t end the debate over slavery in the U. S. It was again a key issue as Americans chose their president in

1852.

Franklin Pierce Democrat

Winfield ScottWhig

John HaleFree Soil

Page 3: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.
Page 4: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

Franklin Pierce of New Hampshire– Our 14th President

He was a northerner, but he sympathized with the South over the slavery issue. He lost his popularity in the north after supporting the Kansas-Nebraska Act.

Page 5: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

First Lady Jane Appleton Pierce

The Pierces faced many tragedies. Their oldest child only lived 3 days. Their second little boy died at age 4 from Typhus, and their third boy died at age 11, just two months before his dad took the oath of office to become President. Sadly, he was decapitated in a train accident.

Page 6: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

The Kansas-Nebraska Act

Americans had hoped the Compromise of 1850 would end the debate over slavery in the western territories.

However, more problems arose when the issue of setting up a government for Nebraska was discussed. Nebraska was a huge region that went from Texas to Canada.

Page 7: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.
Page 8: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

He proposed dividing the region into two territories called Nebraska and Kansas.

Settlers in each territory would decide the issue of slavery using popular sovereignty.

Stephen Douglas, a Senator from Illinois, knew Southerners did not want to add another free state into the union.

Page 9: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

Undoing the Missouri Compromise Some said this was

fair because it was to be used in Utah and New Mexico.

Others said it was bad because the Missouri Compromise had already banned slavery there.

Southerners were in favor of it, because they hoped Kansas would become a slave state.

Franklin Pierce, the Democratic president, supported the act, and it passed becoming a law.

Page 10: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

Northerners Were Furious

Some northerners were outraged that slavery could now possibly move into areas where it had been banned for more than 30 years. They protested by testing the Fugitive Slave Law. In some cities like Boston, they tried to prevent slave catchers from taking runaway slaves back to the South.

Page 11: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

Posters Protesting “Slave Catching”

Page 12: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

In the mid-1850’s pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces battled for control of Kansas. One observer described an election day in Kansas:

“On the morning of the election, before the polls were opened, some 300 or 400 Missourians and others were collected in the yard…where the election was to be held, armed with bowie-knives, revolvers, and clubs. They said they came to vote, and whip the…Yankees, and would vote without being sworn. Some said they came to fight, and wanted one.”

Page 13: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

Kansas Explodes in ViolenceAnti and pro-slavery people rushed into the

Kansas region.Many came for the cheap, available land.Pro-slavery forces wanted to make sure the

anti-slavery people did not control Kansas.Border Ruffians rode in from Missouri.

Page 14: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

Border Ruffians were trouble-makers from Missouri who tried to make sure the territory became slave holding. To this day, there still is a big rivalry between the two states.

Page 15: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

In 1855, hundreds of Border Ruffians voted illegally and elected a pro-slavery legislature.

They passed laws that supported slavery. One gave the death penalty to people who helped slaves escape.

Anti-slavery forces refused to accept these laws and elected their own legislature.

Page 16: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

Bleeding Kansas

In 1856, pro-slavery forces raided the town of Lawrence, an anti-slavery stronghold. They destroyed homes and smashed a newspaper press.

John Brown, an abolitionist, his four sons, and two other men went to a town called Pottawatomie Creek. They drug 5 men out of their beds and murdered them.

Page 17: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

John Brown

A famous abolitionist

Page 18: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

By late in the year 1856, there had been more than 200 people killed in the violence.

Newspapers started referring to Kansas as “Bleeding Kansas”.

Page 19: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

Bloodshed in the Senate

Senator Charles Sumner of Massachusetts was critical of the situation, and also criticized another senator from South Carolina named Andrew Butler.

Butler’s nephew, Congressman Preston Brooks, marched into the Senate and beat Senator Sumner with a cane until he fell bloody and unconscious.

Page 20: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

Charles Sumner, Andrew Butler, and Preston Brooks

Page 21: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

To show support for Congressman Brooks, hundreds of Southerners sent him canes!

With congress in such an uproar, many people thought the Supreme Court could help settle the slavery issue and hopefully restore peace.

The Supreme Court ended up causing even more contention between the North and the South.

Page 22: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

The Dred Scott Decision

Dred Scott, a slave, had lived with his owner for many years in Missouri.

Page 23: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

Later, he lived in Illinois and Wisconsin where slavery was not allowed.

After going back to Missouri, Dred’s owner died, but he was still “owned” by the master’s widow. Anti-slavery lawyers helped him file a lawsuit. They argued that because he had lived in free territories where slavery was not permitted, he should be a free man.

Page 24: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

Eventually, Dred Scott’s case went all the way to the Supreme Court.

The Court’s ruling shocked many Americans.First, they said Scott should never have been

able to sue, because as a black, he was not a citizen.

Second, they agreed that slaves were property.

Page 25: The Road to Civil War Part 3 Bloodshed in Kansas.

The Court didn’t stop there. They went on to say that Congress did not have the authority to outlaw slavery anywhere.

Many Southerners were overjoyed. For years they had considered slaves to be property, and wanted slavery to be allowed everywhere.

Many northerners were shocked and upset.Tensions become even greater.