The Revised CSOs Denise White, WVDE. 21 st Century Learning Mission To grow the seeds of greatness...
-
Upload
emily-jordan -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of The Revised CSOs Denise White, WVDE. 21 st Century Learning Mission To grow the seeds of greatness...
The Revised CSOsDenise White, WVDE
21st Century Learning Mission
To grow the seeds of greatness in every child, teaching them to achieve to their fullest potential so that they may be globally intelligent and resilient in our 21st Century world.
Dr. Steven Paine
PolicyPolicy 2510 13.27
Definition of CurriculumThe content standards, objectives and performance descriptors for all required and elective content areas and 21st century learning skills and technology tools at each programmatic level
How Did We Get The CSOs?
• Teachers selected
• National Standards reviewedo IRA/NCTE Standards o College Board Standardso Principles and Standards for School
Mathematicso Curriculum Focal Points – NCTMo American Diploma Project’s Achieve K-12
Benchmarks
How Did We Get The CSOs?• Assessment Reviews
o National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)
o ACTo SATo TIM S So PISA
• National ReviewsoDr. Norm WebboDr. William Schmidto Partnership for 21st Century Skills
Policy
• 2520.1 – 21st Century Reading and English Language Arts
• 2520.2 - 21st Century Mathematics
• Effective July 1, 2008
The Rigor/Relevance Framework
AAcquisition
BApplication
CAssimilation
DAdaptation
KNOWLEDGE
TAXONOMY
6
5
4
3
2
1
Evaluation
Synthesis
Analysis
Application
Understanding
Awareness
APPLICATION MODEL
1 2 3 4 5Knowledge Apply in
discipline
Apply across
disciplines
Apply toreal world
predictable situations
Apply to real-world
unpredictable situations
Three Ways to Improve Student Learning
• Raise the level of rigor in the content standards and objectives
• Increase the skill and knowledge of teachers in teaching the content
• Engage students in active learning designed around the standards for content, learning skills and technology tools.
So what’s different about these Content
Standards and Objectives?
Depth of Knowledge• Level 1 – Recall, recognition. Skill, a behavior or
sequence of behaviors learned through practice and easily performed
• Level 2 – Application of skills, concepts; conceptual understanding; procedural understanding
• Level 3 – More sophisticated reasoning and analysis; students required to solve problems, draw conclusions given data, arguments, situations and other information; construct mental models translating among different representations; justifying from evidence; summarizing a body of text
• Level 4 – Extended thinking; requires integration of knowledge from multiple sources and ability to represent knowledge in a variety of ways; usually requires work over a period of time
RELA CSO Comparison – Grade 4
Previous Policy• RLA.4.1.11
summarize the author’s purpose (e.g., to persuade; to inform; to determine a specific viewpoint).
Revised Policy• RLA.O.4.1.09
determine author’s purposes in literary and informational texts and use supporting material to justify author’s intent:– To persuade– To entertain– To inform– To determine a specific
viewpoint
RELA CSO Comparison Previous Policy
RLA.O.8.1.08 recognize connections among ideas in literary and informational text (e.g. text to self, text-to-text, text to world connection) and recognize that global awareness promotes understanding, tolerance, and acceptance of ethnic, cultural, religious and personal differences.
Revised Policy
• RLA.8.1.2 relate literary theme to global situations.
RELA CSO ComparisonPrevious Policy Revised Policy
RLA.O.3.1.8 use literary and informational texts to summarize, determine story elements, determine cause and effect, compare and contrast, paraphrase, infer, predict, sequence, draw conclusions, describe characters, and provide main idea and support details.
RLA.3.1.4use comprehension skills to understand a story (e.g., story elements; sequence; expository works; drawing conclusions; compare/contrast; predict; summarize; infer; paraphrase; main idea; story topic).
RELA CSO ComparisonPrevious Policy Revised Policy
RLA.O.5.1.08 differentiate and apply comprehension strategies in literary and informational texts to• draw conclusions• predict• use context clues• summarize• judge text critically
RLA.5.1.5use comprehension skills (e.g., draw conclusions; predict; use context clues; summarize)
Essential Question:
What is it we want all students to learn?
UNPACKING THE CSOSWhat basic knowledge will my students
need to master this objective?
What reasoning skills will students need?
What performances/skills must students have if they master the objective?
What products must students produce with mastery?
LEARNING TARGETS
Knowledge
Reasoning
Performance/Skills
Products
KNOWLEDGE TARGETS
Mastery of substantive subject content where mastery includes both knowing and understanding it.
KNOWLEDGE EXAMPLES
Identify sight words Identify similes and metaphors Know defining characteristics of various literary genres
REASONING TARGETS
The ability to use knowledge and understanding to figure things out and to solve problems.
REASONING EXAMPLES
Make a prediction based on evidence. Examine data/results and propose a meaningful interpretation. Distinguish between fact and opinion. Evaluate information from a variety of resources.
PERFORMANCE/SKILL TARGETS
The development of proficiency in doing something where the process is most important.
PERFORMANCE/SKILL EXAMPLES
Read aloud with fluency and expression. Practice appropriate sight words and content vocabulary Use self-correction strategies.
PRODUCT TARGETS
The development of proficiency in creating something where the final product is most important.
PRODUCT EXAMPLES
Produce a grammatically correct sentence. Develop a proper paragraph form in a written composition. Compose a written composition using the five-step writing process.
RLA.O.4.1.09 determine the author’s purpose in literary and informational texts and use supporting material to justify author’s intent:
•to persuade•to entertain•to inform•to determine a specific viewpoint
KNOWLEDGE: Know what author’s purpose is Know the difference in literary and informational texts Know the characteristics of writing designed to persuade Know the characteristics of writing designed to entertain Know the characteristics of writing designed to inform Know the characteristics of writing designed to designed to express a specific viewpoint
REASONING: Decide on the author’s purpose in a literary text Decide on the author’s purpose in an informational text Determine if the author is trying to persuade, entertain, inform, or express a specific viewpoint
RLA.O.4.1.09 determine the author’s purpose in literary and informational texts and use supporting material to justify author’s intent:
•to persuade•to entertain•to inform•to determine a specific viewpoint
Performance: Use supporting material to justify author’s intent
RLA.O.4.1.09 determine the author’s purpose in literary and informational texts and use supporting material to justify author’s intent:
•to persuade•to entertain•to inform•to determine a specific viewpoint
Product: None specified
RLA.O.4.1.09 determine the author’s purpose in literary and informational texts and use supporting material to justify author’s intent:
•to persuade•to entertain•to inform•to determine a specific viewpoint
YOUR TURN!
Work with a partner.
Use the sheet that has been placed on your table.
Identify the different learning targets of the Objective using the guiding questions.
Discuss as a table group.
http://wvde.state.wv.us/teach21/
Interactive CSOs
The Rigor/Relevance Framework
AAcquisition
BApplication
CAssimilation
DAdaptation
KNOWLEDGE
TAXONOMY
6
5
4
3
2
1
Evaluation
Synthesis
Analysis
Application
Understanding
Awareness
APPLICATION MODEL
1 2 3 4 5Knowledge Apply in
discipline
Apply across
disciplines
Apply toreal world
predictable situations
Apply to real-world
unpredictable situations
Questions?