The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

44
The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in the Samples of Turkish Elderly and Correctional Officers Assist. Prof. Dr. Mithat DURAK Assist. Prof. Dr. Emre ŞENOL-DURAK Prof. Dr. Tülin GENÇÖZ

Transcript of The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Page 1: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

The Reliability and Validity of

the Satisfaction with Life Scale in the Samples of

Turkish Elderly and Correctional Officers

Assist. Prof. Dr. Mithat DURAK

Assist. Prof. Dr. Emre ŞENOL-DURAKProf. Dr. Tülin GENÇÖZ

Page 2: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

SATISFACTION WITH LIFE SCALE

Researchers have investigated the determinants of subjective

well-being in recent years.

According to Pavot and Diener (2004), subjective well-being is

comprised of two constructs:

an emotional or affective component (i.e., positive and negative affect)

and

a conceptual or cognitive component (i.e., satisfaction with life,

marriage, work, and leisure).

Page 3: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Due to increased interest in subjective well-being, scholars

have created several instruments to measure the construct.

Likewise,

The Semantic Differential Scale (SDS; Campbell, Converse, & Rodgers, 1976),

The Life Satisfaction Inventory: Form A (LSI-A; Neugarten, Havinghurst,

& Tobin, 1961),

The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS; Diener, Emmons, Larsen, & Griffin,

1985)

SATISFACTION WITH LIFE SCALE

Page 4: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

According to Updegraff and Suh (2007), the SWLS is widely used to

measure global life satisfaction using five statements relating to

quality of life.

Pavot et al. (1991) stated that the SWLS is superior to other measures

of subjective well-being measures because of its ability to elicit

multiple assessments with only five statements

SATISFACTION WITH LIFE SCALE

Page 5: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

The internal consistency of the SWLS was reported to be .87,

and the test-retest correlation as .82 (Diener et al., 1985).

Similar to the English version of SWLS, a one-factor structure

was found in the French (Blais, Vallerand, Pelletier, & Briere, 1989) and

Dutch (Arrindell, Meeuwesen, & Huyse, 1991) versions following

confirmatory factor analyses.

SATISFACTION WITH LIFE SCALE

Page 6: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Researchers have examined the SWLS with Researchers have examined the SWLS with older individualsolder individuals

((ElavskyElavsky et al., 2005; et al., 2005; MinardiMinardi & Blanchard, 2003)& Blanchard, 2003), , adultsadults (Tucker, (Tucker, OzerOzer, , LyubomirskyLyubomirsky, & , &

Boehm, 2006)Boehm, 2006), and , and adolescentsadolescents ((HoferiHoferi& & ChasiotisChasiotis, 2003), 2003)..

SATISFACTION WITH LIFE SCALE

Page 7: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Further, researchers have studied the role of subjective well-

being on individuals experiencing stressful life events, such as

Mothers of school-aged children with cerebral palsy (Skok,

Harvey, & Reddihough, 2006),

Caregivers of individuals with dementia (McConaghy & Caltabiano,

2005), and

Nurses (Heyns, Venter, Esterhuyse, Bam, & Odendaal, 2003).

SATISFACTION WITH LIFE SCALE

Page 8: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the

psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the SWLS

using two different samples:

Elderly adults (Study-1) and

Correctional officers (Study-2)

AIM of the PRESENT STUDY

Page 9: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

STUDYSTUDY--11

Page 10: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Participants

The sample included 55 males (44.7%) and 68 females

(55.3%) ranging in age from 60 to 85 years (X = 68.18, SD =

5.10).

The majority (70.7%) of the participants was married, with

the remaining participants reporting being widowed (22.8%)

or divorced (6.5%).

56 participants (45.5%) were primary school graduates, 15

participants (12.2%) were secondary school graduates, 23

participants (18.7%) were high school graduates, and 29

participants (23.6%) were university graduates.

STUDY-1: METHOD

Page 11: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Measures

Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)

Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES)

Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)

Demographic Information Form

STUDY-1: METHOD

Page 12: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Procedure

Prior to data collectionPrior to data collection, , two clinical psychologists who were two clinical psychologists who were

fluent in both Turkish and English translated the SWLS into fluent in both Turkish and English translated the SWLS into

Turkish.Turkish.

They attempted to ensure that the translated version was They attempted to ensure that the translated version was

consistent with the original version.consistent with the original version.

Any discrepancies between the two scales were discussed and Any discrepancies between the two scales were discussed and

subsequently resolved by joint agreementsubsequently resolved by joint agreement

STUDY-1: METHOD

Page 13: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Procedure

The measures were distributed to elderly Turkish adults living

in their homes or an institute after obtaining approval from

the ethical committee of the institute.

Participants were gathered using snowball sampling due to the

difficulties associated with recruiting elderly individuals for

psychological studies.

STUDY-1: METHOD

Page 14: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Procedure

Participants living in the institute were selected with the

assistance of psychologists working in there.

After they were informed of the study’s purpose, all

participants indicated their informed consent by signing a

consent form. Participation in the study was voluntary. Thirty-

two individuals chose not to participate in the study.

STUDY-1: METHOD

Page 15: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Procedure

Participants who wanted to complete the questionnaires by

the helps of administrator, they were allowed to do so.

Scale administration to one participant took approximately

0.5 to 1.5 hours.

If necessary, participants were permitted to take a 5 to 10

minute break during the interview.

STUDY-1: METHOD

Page 16: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Reliability

Reliability was assessed using internal consistency indexes. The

SWLS had high internal consistency (.86) in the sample of

elderly adults.

The corrected item total correlation ranged from .69 to .78.

STUDY-1: RESULTS

Page 17: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Factor Validity by Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA)

The researchers examined the oneThe researchers examined the one--factor solution using AMOS factor solution using AMOS

7.0 7.0 (Arbuckle, 2006)(Arbuckle, 2006)

Upon examination of the model solution, Upon examination of the model solution, THE THE MODEL MODEL

ADEQUATELY ADEQUATELY FITFIT THE DATATHE DATA ((χχ2 (5, N=123)=5.293, (5, N=123)=5.293,

p=p=n.sn.s..))

In addition to the suggested In addition to the suggested χχ2/df ratio (/df ratio (χχ2//dfdf=1.059=1.059), the ), the

goodness of fit indexgoodness of fit indexeses showed that the fit was adequate showed that the fit was adequate

((RMSEA=.022RMSEA=.022, , IFI=.999IFI=.999, , TLI=.998TLI=.998,, CFI=.999CFI=.999,, RFI=.968RFI=.968).).

STUDY-1: RESULTS

Page 18: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

STUDY-1: RESULTS

Satisfaction With Life Scale

LifeSat 1

e1

,72

LifeSat 2

e2

,85

LifeSat 3

e3

,75

LifeSat 4

e4

,85

LifeSat 5

e5

,76

Page 19: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Discriminant Validity

Using the 30-item GDS questionnaire, participants were

categorized into two subgroups: a depressive and a non-

depressive group. Initially, two extreme groups were

generated based on the participants’ GDS scores.

Participants with the GDS scores within the highest and the

lowest 25th percentile were grouped as high depressive

symptomatology and low depressive symptomatology,

respectively.

STUDY-1: RESULTS

Page 20: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Discriminant Validity

A 2 (gender: male and female) X 2 (depression: low depressive A 2 (gender: male and female) X 2 (depression: low depressive

group and high depressive group) betweengroup and high depressive group) between--subjects analysis of subjects analysis of

variance (ANOVA) was performed on the Satisfaction With variance (ANOVA) was performed on the Satisfaction With

Life Scale to investigate the instrumentLife Scale to investigate the instrument’’s discriminant validity. s discriminant validity.

A significant A significant main effectmain effect was found for depressive was found for depressive

symptomatology, symptomatology, FF(1,54) = 9.356, (1,54) = 9.356, p < p < .005.005..

STUDY-1: RESULTS

Page 21: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Discriminant Validity

However, a significant However, a significant main effectmain effect for gender was not found, for gender was not found,

FF(1, 54) = 3.075, (1, 54) = 3.075, n.sn.s. In addition, no significant . In addition, no significant interaction interaction

effecteffect was found, was found, FF(1, 54) = 2.226, (1, 54) = 2.226, n.sn.s..

As expected, the main effect of depressive symptomatology As expected, the main effect of depressive symptomatology

revealed that revealed that participants with low levels of depressive participants with low levels of depressive

symptomatologysymptomatology reported higher life satisfaction reported higher life satisfaction ((MM = 28.05)= 28.05)

than than those with high levels of depressive symptomatologythose with high levels of depressive symptomatology ((MM

= 22.27)= 22.27)..

STUDY-1: RESULTS

Page 22: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Concurrent Validity

ParticipantsParticipants’’ scores on the SWLS were positively correlated scores on the SWLS were positively correlated

with with

SelfSelf--esteemesteem ((rr = .28, = .28, p < p < .05),.05),

Perceived health statusPerceived health status (higher scores indicate better health) (higher scores indicate better health)

((rr = .20, = .20, p < p < .05), .05),

Level of social security or insuranceLevel of social security or insurance (higher scores (higher scores

demonstrate better insurance level) (demonstrate better insurance level) (rr = .23, = .23, p < p < .05), and .05), and

Annual incomeAnnual income ((rr = .18, = .18, p < p < .05). .05).

However, participantsHowever, participants’’ scores on the SWLS were negatively scores on the SWLS were negatively

correlated with correlated with latelate--life depressionlife depression ((rr = = --.39, .39, p < p < .001)..001).

STUDY-1: RESULTS

Page 23: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

STUDYSTUDY--22

Page 24: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Participants

Correctional officers were selected from three different types Correctional officers were selected from three different types of prisons due to the danger and stress associated with their of prisons due to the danger and stress associated with their work environment.work environment.

The sample included The sample included 139 males 139 males andand 27 females27 females. Participants. Participants’’ages ranged from 20 to 57 years (ages ranged from 20 to 57 years (XX = 37.19, SD = 7.97).= 37.19, SD = 7.97).

Six participants (3.6%) were secondary school graduates, 106 Six participants (3.6%) were secondary school graduates, 106 participants (63.9%) were high school graduates, and 54 participants (63.9%) were high school graduates, and 54 participants (32.5%) were university graduates.participants (32.5%) were university graduates.

Nineteen percent of the participants worked in maximum Nineteen percent of the participants worked in maximum security prisons, 53% worked in medium security prisons, and security prisons, 53% worked in medium security prisons, and 28% worked in minimum security prisons.28% worked in minimum security prisons.

STUDY-2: METHOD

Page 25: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Measures

Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS)

Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)

Work Stress Scale for Correctional Officers (WSSCO)Work Stress Scale for Correctional Officers (WSSCO)

Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS)Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS)

MaslachMaslach Burnout Inventory (MBI)Burnout Inventory (MBI)

Demographic Information Form

STUDY-2: METHOD

Page 26: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Procedure

The measures were distributed to the correctional officers after

obtaining approval from the ethical committee of the Ministry

of Justice.

Following the prison rules, the researchers informed the

correctional officers about the purpose of the study at

locations, such as the corridors, library, meeting hall, kitchen,

hobby center, and crisis center.

A booklet was distributed to each of them.

All participants indicated their informed consent by signing a

consent form. Participation in the study was voluntary.

STUDY-2: METHOD

Page 27: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Reliability

Reliability was assessed using internal consistency indexes. The

SWLS had high internal consistency (.82) in the sample of

correctional officers.

The corrected item total correlation ranged from .55 to .69.

STUDY-2: RESULTS

Page 28: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Factor Validity by Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA)

The researchers examined the oneThe researchers examined the one--factor solution using AMOS factor solution using AMOS

7.0 7.0 (Arbuckle, 2006)(Arbuckle, 2006)

Upon examination of the model solution, Upon examination of the model solution, THE THE MODEL MODEL

ADEQUATELY ADEQUATELY FITFIT THE DATATHE DATA ((χχ2 (5, N=1(5, N=16666)=5.)=5.862862, , p=p=n.sn.s..))

In addition to the suggested In addition to the suggested χχ2/df ratio (/df ratio (χχ2//dfdf=1.=1.172172), the ), the

goodness of fit indexgoodness of fit indexeses showed that the fit was adequate showed that the fit was adequate

((RMSEA=.0RMSEA=.03322, , IFI=.99IFI=.9977, , TLI=.99TLI=.9933,, CFI=.99CFI=.9977,, RFI=.9RFI=.95555).).

STUDY-2: RESULTS

Page 29: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

STUDY-2: RESULTS

Satisfaction With Life Scale

LifeSat 1

e1

,70

LifeSat 2

e2

,67

LifeSat 3

e3

,65

LifeSat 4

e4

,79

LifeSat 5

e5

,63

Page 30: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Discriminant Validity

Based on their scores on the 21-item BDI questionnaire,

participants were categorized into two subgroups: a depressed

group and a non-depressed group.

The participants with BDI scores within the highest and the

lowest 25th percentile were categorized high depressive

symptomatology and low depressive symptomatology

categories, respectively.

STUDY-2: RESULTS

Page 31: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Discriminant Validity

A 2 (marital status: single and married) X 2 (depression: low A 2 (marital status: single and married) X 2 (depression: low

depressive group and high depressive group) betweendepressive group and high depressive group) between--subjects subjects

analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the SWLS to analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the SWLS to

investigate the instrumentinvestigate the instrument’’s discriminant validity.s discriminant validity.

A significant main effect was found for depressive A significant main effect was found for depressive

symptomatology, symptomatology, FF(1,83) = 6.704, (1,83) = 6.704, p < p < .05..05.

However, no significant main effect was found for marital However, no significant main effect was found for marital

status, status, FF(1, 83) = .003, (1, 83) = .003, n.sn.s..

STUDY-2: RESULTS

Page 32: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Discriminant Validity

Further, no significant interaction effect was found, Further, no significant interaction effect was found, FF(1, 83) = (1, 83) =

.206, .206, n.sn.s..

As expected, the significant main effect for depressive As expected, the significant main effect for depressive

symptomatology revealed that participants with low levels of symptomatology revealed that participants with low levels of

depressive symptomatology reported higher life satisfaction depressive symptomatology reported higher life satisfaction

((MM = 18.11) than those with high levels of depressive = 18.11) than those with high levels of depressive

symptomatology (symptomatology (MM = 12.31).= 12.31).

STUDY-2: RESULTS

Page 33: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Concurrent Validity

The SWLS was positively correlated with positive affect The SWLS was positively correlated with positive affect ((rr

= .26, = .26, p < p < .001) and annual income (.001) and annual income (rr = .23, = .23, p < p < .005)..005).

However, it was negatively related with negative affect (However, it was negatively related with negative affect (rr = = --

.29, .29, p < p < .001), work stress (.001), work stress (rr = = --.34, .34, p < p < .001), job burnout (.001), job burnout (rr

= = --.39, .39, p < p < .001), and depression (.001), and depression (rr = = --.30, .30, p < p < .001)..001).

STUDY-2: RESULTS

Page 34: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

DDIISCUSSSCUSSIIONON

Page 35: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Results suggest that the psychometric properties of the SWLS

are satisfactory.

The results of the internal consistency analysis clearly

demonstrated that the SWLS is appropriate for use with elderly

adults and correctional officers. The results of this study are

similar to those reported in the Diener et al. (1985) and Paolini et al.

(2006).

DISCUSSION

Page 36: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

The results of the CFA demonstrate that the fundamental The results of the CFA demonstrate that the fundamental

factor structure of the SWLS is onefactor structure of the SWLS is one--dimensional in the sampling dimensional in the sampling

of both elderly adults and correctional officers according to of both elderly adults and correctional officers according to

model fit.model fit.

This is particularly true with regard to the several indexes This is particularly true with regard to the several indexes

(RMSEA, IFI, TLI, RFI, and CFI).(RMSEA, IFI, TLI, RFI, and CFI).

This result supports the previous findings obtained from factor This result supports the previous findings obtained from factor

analyses analyses ((PavotPavot et al., 1991)et al., 1991) and confirmatory factor analyses and confirmatory factor analyses ((ArrindellArrindell

et al., 1991; et al., 1991; BlaisBlais et al., 1989)et al., 1989)..

DISCUSSION

Page 37: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

In addition to factorial structure, there is evidence that the

scale has good discriminant and concurrent validity.

The discriminant analysis confirmed that the SWLS factors can

differentiate subjects with depression in the non-clinical

samples of elderly adults and correctional officers.

Consistent with other findings (Pavot et al.,1998), the findings

of the present study confirm that the concept of life

satisfaction is related to positive affect, negative affect, job

burnout, work stress, perceived health status, and annual

income in correctional officers

DISCUSSION

Page 38: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

The generalization of the results may have certain

methodological limitations. Selecting elderly adults and

correctional officers as the sample of the present study is very

reasonable because numerous studies demonstrated that life

satisfaction was related with aging (e.g. Tucker et al., 2006)

and work stress (e.g. Heyns et al., 2003).

Health problems and many restrictions in social life in late life

are extensively related with life satisfaction of elderly.

DISCUSSION

Page 39: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Also, working in a correctional setting is very stressful and risky

due to night shifts, work overload, insufficient division of

labor, ambiguous instructions, manager’s attitudes, feelings of

worthlessness, economical problems, being threatened etc (e.g.,

Şenol-Durak et al., 2006).

Nevertheless, gathering the data from different samples is

needed in order to see the generalizability of the results such as,

other workers who work in highly stressful condition (e.g.,

nurses).

DISCUSSION

Page 40: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Similarly, the sample size is questionable for two samples.Similarly, the sample size is questionable for two samples.

Not testing testNot testing test--retest reliability is another limitation of the retest reliability is another limitation of the

present study.present study.

DISCUSSION

Page 41: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

In conclusion, the results reveal that the psychometric In conclusion, the results reveal that the psychometric

properties of the SWLS are satisfactory.properties of the SWLS are satisfactory.

Further research using demographically diverse populations is Further research using demographically diverse populations is

necessary to strengthen the support for the psychometric necessary to strengthen the support for the psychometric

properties of the SWLS.properties of the SWLS.

DISCUSSION

Page 42: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

Thanks to Thanks to DienerDiener for his permission to translate the SWLS into Turkish and for his permission to translate the SWLS into Turkish and

use it.use it.

This project is partially supported byThis project is partially supported by

A grant from The Scientific and Technological Research Council oA grant from The Scientific and Technological Research Council of f

Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project no: SOBAG 105K155)Turkey (TUBITAK) (Project no: SOBAG 105K155)

A grant from TUBITAKA grant from TUBITAK--BIDEPBIDEP

A grant from AIBUA grant from AIBU

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Page 43: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

For Further questions and comments;

[email protected]

Page 44: The Reliability and Validity of the Satisfaction with Life Scale

THANK YOU…