The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

16
The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas Fu Jian Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Garching 18/12/2012 1

description

The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas. Fu Jian Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Garching 18/12/2012. Millennium and Millennium II Simulation. Millennium Simulation: Springel et al. 2005 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

Page 1: The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for

Molecular and Atomic Gas

Fu JianMax Planck Institute for Astrophysics, Garching

18/12/2012

Page 2: The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

Millennium and Millennium II Simulation Millennium Simulation: Springel et al. 2005

Millennium II Simulation: Boylan-Kolchin et al. 2009

The mass resolution of MS-II is 125 larger than MS: use to study dwarf galaxies and small galaxies at high z

Millennium I (MS) Millennium II (MS-II)

Particle number 21603

Particle Mass 8.6×108M☉h-1 6.8×106 M☉h-1

Box size 500 h-1 Mpc 100 h-1 Mpc

Output snapshots 64 snapshotsBetween z=0 and 127

68 snapshotsBetween z=0 and 127

Minimum halo mass

1.7×1010M☉h-1 1.4×108M☉h-1

Page 3: The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

3

Two phase interstellar gas in SAMs of galaxy formation

Galaxy formation models including only cold gas phase in ISM (e.g DLB07, Guo11, Bower et al. 2006)

Post-Processing models including molecular and atomic phase based on the outputs of models without two-phase gas (Obreschkow et al. 2009; Power et al. 2010) not self-consistent

Models including the atomic-molecular transition and star formation processes throughout the calculation (Cook et al. 2010; Fu et al. 2010; Lagos et al. 2011)

Trace the atomic and molecular gas radial profiles throughout the history

Page 4: The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

The SAMs of galaxy formation including molecular gas and neutral

gas

Multiple concentric ring for each disk The H2 formation recipes

H2 prescription 1: Krumholz et al. 2009; Mckee & Krumholz 2010

H2 prescription 2: Pressure related H2 fraction recipe

H2 proportional star formation law

Based on Munich L-Galaxies model by Guo et al. 2011 models with similar methods in Fu et al. 2010 (based on DLB07)

2H gas gas, Z/Hf

gas gas *2P r G r r f r r

2mol H HI 0/ /R M M P P

Page 5: The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

The star formation model

2SFR H/ constant

Leroy et al. 2008Schruba et al. 2011Genzel et al. 2010 for high z

gas crit

dyn

SFR in DLB07 & Guo11M M

t

2SFR H

Page 6: The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

The problem of gas consumption time scalewhen adopting H2 proportional star

formation law

Solution:Include the radial gas inflow→ Too much gas in outer disks flows inward to compensate too fast gas consumption in inner disk

•Too fast gas consumption in inner diskbecause of star formation and SN feedback

Improper gas surface density profiles compared to the observations

Page 7: The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

7

Radial gas inflow and gas surface density profiles

Galaxy chemical evolution models with radial gas inflow: Lacey & Fall (1985) , Portinari & Chiosi (2000), Spitoni & Matteucci (2011), Schönrich & Binney (2009) etc.

Physical Mechanisms: The mixing of cooling gas with existant disk gas causes the change

of specific angular momentum of gas disk Suppress the increase of specific angular momentum of gas disk

caused by the difference of the gas consumption at different radius

Assumption: gas gas/ dtdL CL

inflow vv rgas gas gas cirL m r v

0 5 10 15 200

1

2

3

4

5

r [kpc]

v inflo

w [km

/s]

1 1 10.30 km s (kpc h )a constant value in the modelsv

Page 8: The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

8

Radial gas inflow and gas surface density profiles

Bigiel et al. 2012

Page 9: The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

9

DLB07 & Guo11: all metal from star formation mix with cold gas, supernova reheat cold gas and metal into halo hot gas too high gas metallicity in inner disk region

too shallow gas metallicity radial gradients compared to observations (e.g Moran et al. 2012)

Gas metallicity radial gradients and mixing of metal elements from star formation

0 5 10 15 20-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

r [kpc]

New model: metal from SN directly mix with halo hot gas; metal from AGB star mix with disk cold gas

flatter gas metallicity gradients

Page 10: The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

10

Mass functions at z=0

7 8 9 10 11-6

-4

-2

0

7 8 9 10-6

-4

-2

0

Keres et al. 2003

8 9 10 11

-4

-2

0

Martin et al. 2010Zwaan et al. 2005

Li et al. 2009Baldry et al. 2008

Page 11: The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

11

The trends of gas metallicity gradients Moran et al. 2012 :174 galaxies with M* >1010M ⊙ from GASS

survey: Galaxies with larger M* tends to have flatter metallicity gradients

Models give similar trends

0 2 4 6 8 10 128

8.2

8.4

8.6

8.8

9

10-1

100

0 2 4 6 8 10 128

8.2

8.4

8.6

8.8

9

10-1

100

0 5 10 15 208

8.2

8.4

8.6

8.8

9

10-1 1008

8.2

8.4

8.6

8.8

9

Page 12: The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

13

The size of star formation rate surface density profiles Larger galaxies have larger size of (Leroy et al. 2008;

Moran et al. 2012)SFR

0 5 10 15

100

10-1

10-2

10-3

10-4

10-5

0 5 10 15 20

0 5 10 15

100

10-1

10-2

10-3

10-4

10-4

10-5

0 5 10 15 20

0 5 10 15 20

100

10-1

10-2

10-3

10-4

10-5

Page 13: The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

14

The size of star formation rate surface density profiles

In the unit of r/rd, the size of and rd tend to be similar

lSFR ~ l*~lH2 (similar to results in Leroy et al. 2008)SFR

0 2 4 6 8

100

10-1

10-2

10-3

10-4

10-5

0 5 10 15 20

100

10-1

10-2

10-3

10-4

10-5

0 2 4 6

100

10-1

10-2

10-3

10-4

10-5

0 2 4 6 8

0 2 4 6

100

10-1

10-2

10-3

10-4

10-4

10-5

0 2 4 6 8

Page 14: The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

15

The HI disk size and HI mass

2 HIHI HI HI 2

HI

constantMM rr

The inner disk has almost constant average HI surface density because of the transition between HI and H2

Broeils & Rhee 1997; Swaters et al. 2002

0.5 1 1.5 28.5

9

9.5

10

10.5

11

H2 prescription 1

0.5 1 1.5 28.5

9

9.5

10

10.5

11H2 prescription 2

Page 15: The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

16

Conclusions Radial gas inflow can solve the problem of too fast gas

consumption in inner disk and give proper gas surface density profiles when adopting H2 proportional star formation law.

The fraction of metal element directly mix with cold/hot gas components can affect the results of gas metallicity radial gradients.

Smaller galaxies tend to have larger gas metallicity gradients Larger galaxies tend to have larger size of star formation rate

surface density profiles, because all have similar tends.

The HI disk size and HI mass:

2SFR H *, ,l l l

2HI HIM r

Page 16: The Radial Profiles of Gas, Gas Metallicity and SFR in the SAMs for Molecular and Atomic Gas

Thank you!