The Pros and Cons of Financial Inclusion Policy in Asia ... · The Pros and Cons of Financial...
Transcript of The Pros and Cons of Financial Inclusion Policy in Asia ... · The Pros and Cons of Financial...
The Pros and Cons of Financial Inclusion Policy in Asia: Evidence
from the PMJDY October 2015
Sumit Agarwal, Low Tuck Kwong Professor of Economics, Finance, and Real Estate, NUS
Consumer Credit Debt & Bank Account (Global Review)
Do consumers have access to banking? Account Penetration
Financial Account & Mobile Account Debit Card Credit Card Internet Payment Wage Payment Government Transfer Payments School Fee Payments Utilities Payment Saving Method Borrowing Behavior
Account Penetration (2014)
Source: The World Bank, Findex Data
Account Penetration (Account, Mobile Account 2014)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Brazil South America,ex. Brazil
Mexico Central America,ex. Mexico
East Asia &Pacific
Europe & CentralAsia
Developing High Income:OECD
Account at a financial institution
Mobile Money & Financial Inst account
Mobile Money account
Account Penetration (Debit Card 2014)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
World Developingeconomies
East Asia &Pacific
Europe &Central Asia
High-incomeOECD
economies
Latin America& Caribbean
Middle East South Asia Sub-SaharanAfrica
Did not have a debit card
Did not use a debit card
Used a debit card
Account Penetration (Credit Card 2014)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
World Developingeconomies
East Asia &Pacific
Europe &Central Asia
High-incomeOECD
economies
Latin America &Caribbean
Middle East South Asia Sub-SaharanAfrica
Did not have a credit card
Did not use a credit card
Used a credit card
Account Penetration (Wage Payment 2014)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
East Asia &Pacific
Europe &Central Asia
High-incomeOECD
economies
Latin America &Caribbean
Middle East South Asia Sub-SaharanAfrica
Developingeconomies
World
In cash only
Into an account
Account Penetration (Wage Payment, Latin America & Caribbean)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Poorest 20% Q2 Q3 Q4 Richest 20%
Account Penetration (Internet Payment 2014)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
World Developingeconomies
East Asia &Pacific
Europe &Central Asia
High-incomeOECD
economies
Latin America &Caribbean
Middle East South Asia Sub-SaharanAfrica
Have access to the internet
at home
Make online payments
Account Penetration (Government Transfer 2014)
0%
10%
20%
East Asia &Pacific
Europe &Central Asia
High-incomeOECD
economies
Latin America& Caribbean
Middle East South Asia Sub-SaharanAfrica
Developingeconomies
World
In cash only
Into an account
Account Penetration (School Fees 2014)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Brazil South America,ex. Brazil
Mexico Central America,ex. Mexico
East Asia &Pacific
Europe & CentralAsia
Developing High Income:OECD
Pay School fees in Cash
Pay School Fees from an
Account
Account Penetration (Utilities Payment 2014)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Brazil South America,ex. Brazil
Mexico Central America,ex. Mexico
East Asia &Pacific
Europe &Central Asia
Developing High Income:OECD
Pay utilities in Cash
Pay utilities from an Account
Account Penetration (Saving Method 2014)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
High Income:OECD
China East Asia &Pacific (ex.
China)
India South Asia (ex.India)
Europe &Central Asia
Latin America& Caribbean
Sub-SaharanAfrica
Saved using an account
Saved using a community
savings group
Did not save
Saved in other ways
Account Penetration (Borrowing Behavior)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
World Developing East Asia &Pacific
Europe &Central Asia
High Income:OECD
LatinAmerica &Caribbean
Middle East South Asia Sub-SaharanAfrica
Family & Friends
Formal financial
institution
Private lender/ store
Did not borrow
Evidence from India
State of Financial Inclusion in India
The user’s perspective
Banks/BCs
NREGA Agents
Pension Agents Utility
Providers
Remittance Agents
Desired Outcome Current Situation
Insurance Agents
Insurance Agents
Banks/BCs
Remittance Agents Utility
Providers
NREGA Agents
Pension Agents
•Advent of SOCIAL banking •Nationalization of banks 1969 •Establishment of Regional Rural banks •Priority Sector lending norms
•Advent of MICROFINANCE •Emergence of SHGs and micro finance institutions
•First no-frills accounts •‘Swabhimaan’ Campaign •Business Correspondents as banking channel
I PHASE II PHASE III PHASE
1960 - 1990 1990 - 2005 2005 onwards
Background on State-led Financial Inclusion schemes in India
The Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana • Launched on 28 August 2014 – First scheme to focus on households and non-credit financial inclusion
• Key features of PMJDY are: • Any individual above the age of 10 years can open a Basic Savings Bank Deposit Account (BSBDA) under
PMJDY • Interest on deposits in savings bank account • Accidental insurance cover of Rs.100,000 and life insurance cover of Rs.30,000 • No minimum balance required • Easy transfer of money across India • Direct Benefit Transfer for beneficiaries of government schemes • Overdraft facility after satisfactory operation of the account for 6 months • Access to pensions through the National Pension Scheme • Overdraft facility upto Rs.5000/- is available in only one account per household, preferably lady of the
household
2 Phases of PMJDY
Phase I (from 15 Aug 2014 -14 Aug 2015):
• Universal access to banking facilities.
• Providing Basic Banking Accounts with overdraft facility of up to Rs. 5000/-.
• RuPay Debit Card with inbuilt accident insurance cover of Rs. 1 lakh.
• Financial Literacy Programme.
Phase II (from 15 Aug 2015 -14 Aug 2018):
• Creation of Credit Guarantee Fund for coverage of defaults in overdraft accounts.
• Micro Insurance.
• Unorganized sector Pension schemes, like Swavlamban.
• Coverage of households in hilly, tribal and difficult areas, and coverage of remaining adults in the households and students.
Operation of the Scheme • All 600,000 villages across the country mapped to the “Service Area” of each bank
• At least one fixed point banking outlet for every 1,000 to 1,500 households, known as a “Sub Service Area” (SSA)
• The SSAs serviced through a combination of bank branches and fixed point Bank Mitrs (BMs) -business correspondents or agents
Progress under PMJDY
0.00
200.00
400.00
600.00
800.00
1000.00
1200.00
1400.00
1600.00
1800.00
Accounts Opened And Rupay Cards Issued Sep-14 to Apr-15 (in Lakhs)
Num of Rural Accounts(Cumulative)
Num of Urban Accounts(Cumulative)
No. Of Accounts with ZeroBalance (Cumulative)
No. Of Rupay Debit Card(Cumulative)
• 153 million accounts as of May 2015 – 18% of population above 15 years of age
• Wide disparity in State-wise and urban-rural coverage • Less than half accounts Adhaar seeded
Progress under PMJDY
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
1600000
1800000
Total Balance in Accounts (Rs. Lakhs)
Private Banks
Public Sector Bank
Rural Regional Bank
Overall
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Sep.14 Oct.14 Nov.14 Dec.14 Jan.15 Feb.15 Mar.15 Apr.15
Average Balance per Account (Rs.)
Private Banks
Public Sector Bank
Rural Regional Bank
Overall
• Overall balances have increased • Average balances per account still low – lowest for Public Sector Banks • Zero balance accounts still make up 57.9% of all accounts
Key Concerns
• Viability of scheme for banks • Duplication in account opening • Capacity of current BC framework to deliver multiple products and
ensure their optimal use, especially among low-income households
Can PMJDY be profitable? Let’s take example of ICICI bank
• No. of account opened under PMJDY is 2214299
• Cost of operating account: 2214299 * 150 = 3321.4485 lakhs
• Operating expense incurred by bank is 310739 lakhs
• So, PMJDY accounts for approximately 1% of operating expense incurred by banks.
Are banks earning Profit by PMJDY?
• Cost of maintaining total no of accounts: 2214299 * 150 = 3321.4485 lakhs
• Balance in account: 15174.79 lakhs
• After investing at 5% bank earn: 15174.79 *5% = 758.7395 lakhs
• So banks are making loss
• Loss = balance in account – cost of maintaining account = 758.7395 - 3321.4485 = -2562.709
• So banks are making loss of approximately 2500 lakhs.
Can banks make a profit in in future?
• Assuming the same trend of declining zero account balance in the subsequent quarters number of accounts with zero balance would reduce to nearly 0% by September 2016.Hopefully, this will reduce losses to some extent. But at current operating expenses, banks need at least 4 times the total balance to break even.
• This does not include the risk associated with defaults from overdrafts.
• Around Rs 52,000 crore would be distributed during the next fiscal year through these accounts in terms of subsidies. At 1% commission, subsidy transfer could cover losses.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Sep.14 Oct.14 Nov.14 Dec.14 Jan.15 Feb.15 Mar.15 Apr.15
Zero Balance Accounts as % of Total Accounts
Private Banks Public Sector Bank Rural Regional Bank Overall
BC as a channel Who can be a BC? Currently, banks have been permitted to engage individuals or entities like (i) Retired Bank Employees (ii) Retired Teachers (iii) Retired Govt. Employees (iv) Ex-Servicemen (v) Individual owners of kirana / medical/ fair price shops (vi) Individual Public Call Office (PCO) operators (vii) Agents of Small Savin Scheme of Government of India / Insurance Companies, ‘for profit’ companies registered under the
Indian Companies Act (viii) Since 24-06-2014, RBI has permitted Non Deposit taking NBFCs as BCs in addition to above Key issues: • Field research by College of Agricultural Banking, CGAP, and MicroSave suggest that over 75 per cent of accounts opened and over
25 per cent of BCs are dormant • It costs about Rs. 11,400 (USD 185) per month to maintain a transaction-ready BC channel, with the costs split between the BCNM,
the BCA, and the bank – currently BM paid Rs.5000 per month, 1% DBT commission for banks insufficient • Most traditional mechanisms of risk management (eg. collateral, scoring) will therefore not work for these clients and the
underwriting required will be more intensive in nature. On pensions and savings products, the issues will be in helping the clients with variable and low income to save adequately towards their goals-Most Bank Mitras not currently qualified for this, like kirana shop owners and retired teachers.
Average Monthly Balance (Rs)
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
Aver
age
Mon
thly
Bal
ance
(Rs)
• Not surprisingly there is a drop in average account balance. In the post-JDY periods banks were mandated to open an account for every citizen irrespective of whether they had savings to deposit or not.
Access to Debit Cards
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Bank
acc
ount
s with
deb
it ca
rds (
%)
• This graph represents the time trends in percentage of bank accounts with debit cards
• Consistent with JDY improving the ease of access to banking services
Frequency of transactions using cards
• This graph represents the time trends in percentage of bank account holders using debit cards for purchases.
• Very small proportion of the account holders use card to make purchases • However, there appears to be upward trend in the use of card in the post-JDY
period • This is consistent with JDY raising awareness and the ease of access to
banking services
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
Freq
uenc
y of
Car
d Tr
ansa
ctio
ns(%
)
Average Transaction value for card purchases
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Aver
gae
Tran
sact
ion
Valu
e (R
s)
• This graph represents the time trends in the transaction value of card purchases • Again, there appears to be an upward trend in the transaction value of purchases
made using debit cards.
Data
• Data from a local financial institution in India offering Savings Bank Account, Loans (individual and joint liability),remittances, pensions,insurance(live,accident,livestock,shop) and utility payments
• Products offered by multiple financial providers such as banks and insurance companies but available to the customer through a branch not more than 5km from his residence and serving about 2000 households surrounding it
• Data on 344,908 customers in the three Indian states of Tamil Nadu, Uttarakhand and Orissa
• 92% of sample working in unorganized sector and nearly 51% with a primary-level education or below
• 65% of customers are women
Factors influencing financial product take-up
• Seasonality • Household Factors • Provider related factors
• Access – Distance to Provider • Staff related factors – Transfers , efficicency • Product requirements and structure
Seasonality: Region-Specific Factors
In Uttarakhand(Sahastradhara), deposits are lowest in Dec-Apr when snowfall makes it difficult to reach branch. Withdrawals are higher during Jun-Sep when the area is prone to heavy rain and landslides .
In Orissa(Dhanei) deposits and withdrawals peak during February just before major harvest of Rabi Wheat and Summer Paddy.
Seasonality: Complementarity between products
Remittances are more or less spread out throughout the year in Pudhuaaru (Tamil Nadu) where most migrants are working in semi-skilled jobs abroad. However, in Dhanei(Orissa) and Sahastradhara(Uttarakhand) most migration is domestic and seasonal for wage labour. Hence we see lesser loans taken when remittances are higher and vice versa.
Seasonality: Product Eligibility Factors
For the Pension product, transactions peak during March deadline for government subsidy of Rs.1,000 offered if customer contributed at least Rs.1,000 in the financial year
The livestock insurance product, which is a requirement for some livestock loans sees greater purchase in the months when livestock loan disbursement is high
Seasonality: Product Eligibility Factors
Seasonality: Provider Targets
Disbursements of loans peak in March when priority sector lending targets are to be met at year-end closing
Treatment vs Control Overall
Treatment vs Control
Figure: Average Monthly Balance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 2 / 109
Treatment vs Control Overall
Treatment vs Control
Figure: Cash Deposit Amount
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 4 / 109
Treatment vs Control Overall
Treatment vs Control
Figure: Cash Withdrawal Amount
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 5 / 109
Treatment vs Control Overall
Treatment vs Control
Figure: Outward Remmitance Amount
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 6 / 109
Treatment vs Control Overall
Treatment vs Control
Figure: Proportion of account holders who deposited
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 8 / 109
Treatment vs Control Overall
Treatment vs Control
Figure: Proportion of account holders who withdrew
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 9 / 109
Treatment vs Control Overall
Treatment vs Control
Figure: Proportion of account holders who received remittance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 10 / 109
Treatment vs Control Overall
Treatment vs Control
Figure: Proportion of account holders who sent remittance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 11 / 109
Treatment vs Control Overall
Treatment vs Control
Figure: Proportion of account holders who used accounts for deposit, withdrawal or remittance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 12 / 109
Treatment vs Control Overall
Treatment vs Control
Figure: Proportion of Accounts with positive account balance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 13 / 109
Age Quartiles Treatment Group
Treatment (By Age Quartiles)
Figure: Average Monthly Balance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 14 / 109
Gender Treatment Group
Treatment (By Gender)
Figure: Average Monthly Balance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 38 / 109
Gender Treatment Group
Treatment (By Gender)
Figure: Accounts With Debit Card
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 39 / 109
Gender Treatment Group
Treatment (By Gender)
Figure: Cash Deposit Amount
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 40 / 109
Marital Status Treatment Group
Treatment (By Marital Status)
Figure: Average Monthly Balance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 62 / 109
Marital Status Treatment Group
Treatment (By Marital Status)
Figure: Cash Deposit Amount
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 64 / 109
Mobile Ownership Treatment Group
Treatment (By Mobile Ownership)
Figure: Average Monthly Balance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 86 / 109
GDP Quartiles Treatment Group
Treatment (By GDP Quartiles)
Figure: Average Monthly Balance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 2 / 73
GDP Quartiles Treatment Group
Treatment (By GDP Quartiles)
Figure: Cash Withdrawal Amount
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 5 / 73
GDP Quartiles Treatment Group
Treatment (By GDP Quartiles)
Figure: Outward Remmitance Amount
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 7 / 73
GDP Quartiles Treatment Group
Treatment (By GDP Quartiles)
Figure: Proportion of account holders who withdrew
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 9 / 73
GDP Quartiles Treatment Group
Treatment (By GDP Quartiles)
Figure: Proportion of account holders who received remittance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 10 / 73
GDP Quartiles Treatment Group
Treatment (By GDP Quartiles)
Figure: Proportion of account holders who used accounts for deposit, withdrawal or remittance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 12 / 73
GDP Quartiles Treatment Group
Treatment (By GDP Quartiles)
Figure: Proportion of Accounts with positive account balance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 13 / 73
GDP Quartiles Control Group
Control (By GDP Quartiles)
Figure: Average Monthly Balance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 14 / 73
GDP Quartiles Control Group
Control (By GDP Quartiles)
Figure: Cash Deposit Amount
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 16 / 73
GDP Quartiles Control Group
Control (By GDP Quartiles)
Figure: Cash Withdrawal Amount
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 17 / 73
Rural Quartiles Treatment Group
Treatment (By Rural Quartiles)
Figure: Average Monthly Balance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 26 / 73
Rural Quartiles Treatment Group
Treatment (By Rural Quartiles)
Figure: Proportion of account holders who withdrew
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 33 / 73
Rural Quartiles Treatment Group
Treatment (By Rural Quartiles)
Figure: Proportion of account holders who received remittance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 34 / 73
Rural Quartiles Treatment Group
Treatment (By Rural Quartiles)
Figure: Proportion of Accounts with positive account balance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 37 / 73
Rural Quartiles Control Group
Control (By Rural Quartiles)
Figure: Average Monthly Balance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 38 / 73
Rural Quartiles Control Group
Control (By Rural Quartiles)
Figure: Accounts With Debit Card
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 39 / 73
Literacy Quartiles Treatment Group
Treatment (By Literacy Quartiles)
Figure: Average Monthly Balance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 50 / 73
Literacy Quartiles Treatment Group
Treatment (By Literacy Quartiles)
Figure: Cash Withdrawal Amount
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 53 / 73
Literacy Quartiles Treatment Group
Treatment (By Literacy Quartiles)
Figure: Proportion of account holders who withdrew
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 57 / 73
Literacy Quartiles Treatment Group
Treatment (By Literacy Quartiles)
Figure: Proportion of Accounts with positive account balance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 61 / 73
Literacy Quartiles Control Group
Control (By Literacy Quartiles)
Figure: Average Monthly Balance
Sumit Aggarwal (NUS) JDY 62 / 73