The principle of using precedents to guide future decisions in court cases is called:
-
Upload
neal-newman -
Category
Documents
-
view
223 -
download
3
Transcript of The principle of using precedents to guide future decisions in court cases is called:
The principle of using The principle of using precedents to guide precedents to guide
future decisions in court future decisions in court cases is called:cases is called:
The Miranda v. The Miranda v. Arizona decision Arizona decision
requires requires investigators to investigators to
advise suspects of advise suspects of their rights when their rights when
they have:they have:
Where does the Where does the authority of authority of
officer powers officer powers originateoriginate
When illegally found, When illegally found, evidence is not allowed evidence is not allowed
to be used in court to be used in court because the source of because the source of that evidence was NOT that evidence was NOT
legal it is called:legal it is called:
It is more than a gut It is more than a gut feeling because it feeling because it
includes the ability to includes the ability to articulate (speak out) articulate (speak out)
reasons for the reasons for the suspicion:suspicion:
In most search In most search warrant warrant
executions what executions what do you have to do you have to
do?do?
Officers do NOT Officers do NOT have to knock and have to knock and announce if there announce if there
is/are:is/are:
The first priority The first priority in any traffic in any traffic stop or any stop or any
other operation other operation is:is:
Evidence that is not Evidence that is not usable in court usable in court because it was because it was
seized seized unconstitutionally is unconstitutionally is not used because of not used because of
the:the:
Falling between Falling between articulable suspicion articulable suspicion
and certainty, it is and certainty, it is required by the required by the
constitution in most constitution in most searches & seizuressearches & seizures
Testifying Testifying against yourselfagainst yourself
The Supreme Court did The Supreme Court did not interpret the not interpret the
Fourteenth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment as incorporating the Bill as incorporating the Bill
of Rights until:of Rights until:
The criminal law of The criminal law of the United States, the United States,
for the most part, is for the most part, is derived from the derived from the
laws of:laws of:
The authors of a study The authors of a study on wrongful convictions on wrongful convictions
conservatively estimated conservatively estimated that approximately ____ that approximately ____ of all felony convictions of all felony convictions
are in errorare in error
Prison conditions Prison conditions are regulated by are regulated by this amendment this amendment
and requires health and requires health care for inmatescare for inmates
This amendment is called This amendment is called the “defendant’s law” and the “defendant’s law” and it provides for a speedy it provides for a speedy and public trial, a local and public trial, a local
and impartial jury, & right and impartial jury, & right to counsel among other to counsel among other
provisionsprovisions
Name the case from the Supreme Name the case from the Supreme Court ruling:Court ruling:
“Deliberate indifference to “Deliberate indifference to serious medical needs of serious medical needs of prisoners” is a violation of prisoners” is a violation of
the 8the 8thth amendment amendment
Name the case from the Name the case from the Supreme Court ruling:Supreme Court ruling:
Evidence found Evidence found unlawfully may not unlawfully may not
be used in courtbe used in court