The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June...
-
Upload
alexandra-nash -
Category
Documents
-
view
212 -
download
0
Transcript of The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June...
![Page 1: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self-
Organized Systems
EWOMSLisbon, June 4th-6th 2009
Maarten Wijnants1 Ralf Cox1 Fred Hasselman1
Anna Bosman1 & Guy Van Orden2
1 Behavioral Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, the Netherlands2University of Cincinnati, OH
![Page 2: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Overview
• Introduction to Topics of Complexity
• Precision Aiming: – Non-Dominant Hand Practice– Kinematics – Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off
• Consequences for Theory and Modelling
![Page 3: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
1/f in complex systems
• Long-Range Dependence:– Every Data Points Exerts an Influence of Some Magnitude on
Every Other Data Point
• Variation Increases Rather than Stabilizes with Larger Sample Sizes
• Runs Against Standard Statistical Intuitions– Data = Signal + Noise– Central Limit Theorem
Presence and Relative Change of 1/f scaling is Telling of System Dynamics
![Page 4: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
How structured is it?
![Page 5: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
1/f scaling and cognition:Two approaches
• Component-dominant dynamics
– Traditional (information processing) approach in cognitive psychology
– Independent components work at characteristic time scales
– Summed effects of multiple time scale random processes can naturally yield 1/f spectra
– E.g. Additive Factors (Sternberg)• Word-naming:
– Perception– Word recognition– Response selection– Action
AD
DIT
IVE
+
+
e.g. Wagenmakers, Farell, & Ratcliff, 2004
![Page 6: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
1/f scaling and cognition:Two approaches
• Interaction-dominant dynamics
– 1/f emerges through coordinated interactions between components
– Components at different scales change each others dynamics
– No statistically independent components: • A single process extends across all time scales of variation
INT
ER
AC
TIV
E
e.g. Holden, Van Orden & Turvey, 2008
![Page 7: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
• Participant power spectrum plus 20 % noise• Participant power spectrum plus 30 % noise
How does it change, what does it mean?
• Participant power spectrum• Participant power spectrum plus 10 % noise
![Page 8: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Hypothesis
• 1/f scaling reveals the intrinsic dynamics of coordinated self-organized systems
• 1/f Scaling Changes as a Function of• Mechanical, Anatomical, Physiological, Neural,
Environmental, and/or Task-Related Constraints• Degree of Skill and Perturbation of Task Performance
• Task performances cannot be fully understood or described in terms of mean behavior, hence at single levels of analysis
• i.e. Average movement duration or accuracy
![Page 9: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Motor Coordination: Key Ingredients
• Degrees-of-freedom problem:– “the problem of how to compress the movement system’s state
space of very many dimensions into a control space of very few dimensions” (Turvey, 1990, p. 939)
• A Synergy is a (meta) stable organization whose components are always ready to participate in other stable organizations
• Complex systems minimize their entropy production and energy dissipation as they self-organize
1/f scaling, phase-space dynamics and entropy measures provide a sensitive metric for such cooperative interactions
![Page 10: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Precision aiming
• Average Movement Time• Function of target size and distance between
targets
• MT = a + b (ID)• ID = log2 (2D / W)
• What about fluctuations over time?
![Page 11: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Purposely difficult (ID = 6.9)
ND1 ND2 ND3 ND4 ND5
block
-1.50
-1.00
-0.50
slo
pe
MT
ND1 ND2 ND3 ND4 ND5
block
0.50
0.60
0.70
0.80
mea
nm
t_c
ND1 ND2 ND3 ND4 ND5
block
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
accu
racy
F(4, 56) = 4.65, p < .01
F(4,56) = 3.62, p < .02
F(4,56) < 1
D = 24 cm
W = 0.8 cm
• 5 blocks x 1100 trials
• Non-dominant hand
1 2 3 4 5
block
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.75
1.00
sam
pen
F(4,56) = 3.87, p < .05
![Page 12: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
RQA in Motor Learning
Recurring sequences of data points Recurring data points
Complexity of deterministic structure Attractor strength ~ Lyapunov exp
• Nonlinear technique• Transform original series into its embedding matrix (EM) based on delays • higher dimensional recurrences captured by single variables• By creating “time”/”space” delayed versions of the signal• Setting a radius
![Page 13: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Purposely easy (ID = 3)
D = 8 cm
W = 2 cm
• 5 blocks x 1100 trials
• Non-dominant hand
• No change in 1/f scaling
• No change in RQA measures
• All F (4,56)’s < 1
•
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
Session
-1.50
-1.00
-0.50
Sp
ectr
al s
lop
e M
T
![Page 14: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
All F (4,56)’s < 1
RQA Dynamics
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
block
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
rad
ius
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
block
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
det
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
block
0.50
1.00
1.50
ent
1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
block
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
max
line
![Page 15: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Conclusion
• High-ID condition: motor learning – More 1/f scaling with practice– More confined, less random, and stronger underlying
attractor– Less random, more patterned compression of degrees-of-freedom
• Low-ID condition: overlearning– No change in 1/f– No change in reconstructed phase space No further compression of degrees-of-freedom
![Page 16: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Kinematics and long-range correlations
• Higher-Order MT Dynamics Relate to Movement Duration and Accuracy– Differently in two radically different ID conditions
• Another Level of Analysis: Individual Oscillatory Movements
– Kinematic Patterns: Velocity Profile, Acceleration Profile, Hooke’s Plot
![Page 17: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Harmonicity
• Simple Harmonic Oscillation vs. Damped Oscillation • Self-Sustained Oscillation (Kugler & Turvey, 1987)• Energy Dissipation• Index of Harmonicity (Guiard, 1993; 1997)• Between conditions: Index-of-Difficulty (Mottet & Bootsma, 1999)• Between participants: Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off
![Page 18: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
MT SL
Higher-order dynamics
Constraints:ID = 6.9
Energy minimizationEmergent coordinationSpeed
Speed
Spee
dAccuracy
Accuracy
Accur
acy
H : -.60 -0.75 WD
H : .60 .50
H : .87 -.85
-.40 .35
.62 -.25
1/f noise SampEn
Kinematics
-.60
1/f noise SampEn
1/f noise
SampEn -.45
![Page 19: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
MT SL
Constraints:ID = 6.9
Energy minimizationEmergent coordination
Kinematics
-.601/f noise
Higher-order dynamics
• Fast • Not accurate
![Page 20: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
MT SL
Constraints:ID = 6.9
Energy minimizationEmergent coordination
Kinematics
-.601/f noise
Higher-order dynamics
• Slow• Accurate
![Page 21: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
MT SL
H : CEILING
W
D
Kinematics
.561/f noise
Higher-order dynamics
Constraints:ID = 3
Energy minimizationEmergent coordination
Accuracy : CEILINGSpeed: CEILING
![Page 22: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Speed-accuracy trade-off and highly related levels of analysis
• High-ID condition: – More harmonious movements:
• faster and less accurate• more 1/f in MT series, less 1/f in succesive line lengths• More 1/f, lower dimensional attractor
– speed-accuracy trade-off at three levels of analysis:• Higher-order dynamics (fractal correlations, entropy)• Movement time and terminal accuracy• Kinematic patterns
• Low-ID condition– Kinematics show ceiling effect– Movement time and accuracy show ceiling effects– Fractal dynamics: win-win instead of trade-off
• Task constraints:– Win-win or trade-off
![Page 23: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Comparing conditions
-1
-0.9
-0.8
-0.7
-0.6
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
1 2 3 4
ID = 6.9 ID = 3
MTMT SL SL
![Page 24: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Across-task differences• Simple RT, Precision aiming:
– Each trial is identical: same SIGNAL to respond and same RESPONSE
– EXTERNAL sources of variation in Response Time are minimized
Variation must largely reflect INTERNAL sources
• Choice RT, Word-naming– Experimental trials differ:
A different SIGNAL to respond and a different RESPONSE
– EXTERNAL sources of variation in Response Time are introduced to the measured values
Variation must reflect INTERNAL sources to a lesser extent
-0.9
-0.8
-0.7
-0.6
-0.5
-0.4
-0.3
-0.2
-0.1
0
Wo
rdN
amin
g
Ch
oice
RT
Sim
ple
RT
Precisio
naim
ing
| Discrete | Cyclic |
N responses 1 response
4 responses
Data from: Van Orden, Holden, & Turvey, 2003; Kello, Beltz, Van Orden, & Turvey, 2007; Wijnants et al., 2009
![Page 25: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
1 2 3
GROUP
-1.00
-0.50
0.00
Sp
ectr
al S
lop
e
Human Gait
• Old adults Parkinson disease (1)
• vs. Old adults (2)
• vs. Young adults (3)
1.00 2.00 3.00
block
-0.60
-0.40
-0.20
0.00
slo
pe
• Repetition effects reduce RT and SD
• Facilitate WN performance• Three blocks of 1100 same
word stimuli
Word-Naming
![Page 26: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
How does 1/f scaling change?• Component-dominant dynamics
The presence of specific processes affects the presence of 1/f scaling (AC or UC)
Changing strategies
• Interaction-dominant dynamics
– Adaptive basis of coordinated behavior– Scaling relations track the efficiency of the
coordination of perception and action Perturbations reduce the presence of 1/f
scaling Unsystematic variation, e.g. less coordinated
behavior, whitens the data signal More coordinated behaviors reveal more 1/f
AD
DIT
IVE
INT
ER
AC
TIV
E
![Page 27: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Variation increases with sample size
– Longer data series pick up more 1/f scaling (Van Orden, Holden, & Turvey, 2005)
1024
2048
8192
![Page 28: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Cue Predictability in CRT
(Kello, Beltz, Van Orden, & Turvey, 2007)
![Page 29: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
• These results follow naturally from predictions of an interaction-dominant approach
• Component-dominant approaches should post-hoc explain:– New components for longer data series– New components for every independent stream of 1/f – Consistent changes in 1/f scaling with changes in task
performance (at multiple levels of analysis)
Modular or interactive dynamics?
![Page 30: The Presence of 1/f Scaling Reveals Coordination in Self- Organized Systems EWOMS Lisbon, June 4th-6th 2009 Maarten Wijnants 1 Ralf Cox 1 Fred Hasselman.](https://reader034.fdocuments.in/reader034/viewer/2022050714/56649ec95503460f94bd73ae/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Sum up
• Long-range dependence can be manipulated in predictable ways– Practice or more stable and coordinated
behaviors shows more 1/f scaling– Stronger task constraints (external variation)
perturb performances, fewer 1/f– More 1/f scaling goes with less random and
stronger underlying attractors– 1/f scaling is to some extent present in any
repeated behaviors