The power of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test...The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is a goodness of fit test...
Transcript of The power of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test...The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is a goodness of fit test...
The power of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test
Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic)
Authors Schultz, Rodney Edward, 1941-
Publisher The University of Arizona.
Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this materialis made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona.Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such aspublic display or performance) of protected items is prohibitedexcept with permission of the author.
Download date 04/05/2021 19:36:08
Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/318363
THE POWER OF THE KOLMOGOROV-SMIRNOV TEST
byRodney Edward Schultz
A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of theCOMMITTEE ON STATISTICS
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree ofMASTER OF SCIENCE
In the Graduate CollegeTHE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
1 9 7 2
STATEMENT BY AUTHOR
This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill- mfiit of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library.
Brief quotations from this thesis arc allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean, of the Graduate College when in his judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author.
SIGNED:
APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below:
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author wishes to express his gratitude to th following: to Dr * John Denny for guidance and encouragement during this thesis study, and to Hughes Aircraft Company for allowing participation in their work/study fellowship program„
iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PageLIST OF TABLES o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o V
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS . • • • • \ • « • . . • • . • o . viiA. 13 S T? RA 0 T? o o © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © "̂*GENERAL © © © © © © © © © o © © © © © © © © © © © © 1THE OR. Y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ^ O O O O 3
Computational Method © © © © © © © © © © © © © © 4
TYPES OF TESTS © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © 8
TEST (3 ( 1 ) O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O © © 10T ES T |3 ( 2 ) e e o o o c o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 1 3TES T (3 ( 2A ) o o © o o o O O O © O O O O 0 . 0 O O C O © 17
T ES T |3 ( 3 ) © o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o © 1 8
COMPARISON OF TESTS © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © 19
APPENDIX© TABLES FOR THE EXACT POWERS © © © © © © © 29
REFERENCES © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © © 6 8
iv
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page1 o Table of R(oc 9 n) Values for n = 2 to 20 o o .» 12
2 o Table of A(oc ̂ n) and e (cc 3 n) Values forn =■ 2 to 10 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0. 0 15
3 o Table of A (oc 9 n) and e(oc, n) Values forn — 11 fO 20 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 0 0 1 6
4 o Table for the Exact Powers of the Test s(3(1) Of SlZe 2 o o o o 0 0.0 o o o o o o o o 30
5 o Table for the Exact Powers of the Test{3 (I ) of Size 3 ° ° 0 ° 0 0 ° ° ° 0-6 0 0 0 0 32
60 Table for the Exact Powers of the Test(3(1) Of SlZe 4 0 0 o o o o 0 0 0 0 o o o o o 3 4
7 o Table for the Exact Powers of the Test3(1) of Size 5 ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° ° 36
- 80 Table for the Exact Powers of the Test3 ( I ) of Size 6 o a 0 0 0 o o o o o o o o o o 3^
. 9 o Table for the Exact Powers of the Test3(l) of Size 7 ° ° ° ° ° ° ® ° ° ° ° ° o o o 40
10 o Table for the Exact Powers of the Test3(1) of Size 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 42
1 1 o Table for the Exact Powers of the Test3(1) of Size 9 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 44
12 o Table for the Exact Powers of the Test3(1) of Size 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 46
13 o Table for the Exact Powers of the Test3(l) of Size 11 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 48
l4o Table for the Exact Powers of the Test3(1) of Size 12 o o o o o o o o O O O O O O 3 0
V
viLIST OF TABLES--Continued
Table Page15 ° Table for the Exact Powers of the Test
P(l) of Size 13 ° ° ° o 0 0 0 o o o o © o o 2
160 Table for the Exact Powers of the Test(3(1) O f S-XZe Ik o o o o o o 0 0 o o o o o o 5 ̂
1 ? o . Table for the Exact Powers of the Test(3(1) of Size 15 ° 0 0 0 o o o o o o o o o o
l 8 o Table for the Exact Powers of the Test(3(1). O f SlZe l6 o o o o o 0 0 o o o o o o o ^ 8
19 o Table for the Exact Powers of the Test(3(f) of Size 17 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O 80
20 o Table f or the Exact Powers of the Test(3(1) of Size 18 o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 6 2
21 o Table for the Exact Powers of the Test(3(1) O f SlZe 19 O O O O O O O 0 6 O 0 © O O
22 © Table for the Exact Powers of the Test.(3(1) of Size 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 o' 0 0 0 66
LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Figure Page1 o Acceptance Region for Oc = ,05 and
n = 5 o o o o. o o o o o ° o o o O . ° ° ° ° ° 20
2 e Acceptance Region11 — 10 o e o o
for oc = o05 ando e o o o 0 21
3 • Acceptance Region n — 2 0 o o o o'
for oc = 0O 5 ando o o o o o 22
4 o Power of Test for n = 5 o ° o o o ° o ° ° ° • 23
5 o Power of Test for n = 10 o ° o o o ° ° ° ° ° . . 24
6 . Power of Test for n = to o •o o o o ° ° ° ° ° ° 25
7c Power of Test for oc = ,01 ° o o o ° ° ° ° ° « 26
8 o Power of Test for oc = ,05 o o ° ° ° ° ° ° 2?
9 • Power Of Test for OC — OCM o o o o O 0 28
vii
ABSTRACT
There are many papers that give tables and methods
for determining the level (oc) of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov
test 9 but the tables on the power (1 -type II error) are
very limited in the number of values given*. The main
purpose of this paper is to expand the tables for the power
of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test.
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is a goodness of fit
test which is used when a randomly sampled population is
tested against an ja priori completely specified continuous
distribution with cumulative frequency distribution „
That is 3 for any specified value of X , the value of F^(X)
is the proportion of individuals in the population having
measurements less than or equal to X „ The cumulative step
function of a sample of n observations F^(X) is expected to
be fairly close to F^(X)» If it is not close enough, this
is evidence that the hypothetical distribution is not the
correct one and therefore some other distribution is the
true population distribution*, The paper contains a study
of the behavior of some Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests against
certain alternatives o
viii
GENERAL
In this paper we shall compare the completely specified continuous null hypothesis:
H : F = F (x) (1)o o
against a continuous alternative hypothesis:
H1 : F = G(x ), ' (2)where
G(x) = [F^(x)] 1+ ̂ (3 )
for various values of 6 0. This alternative, as given bySuzuki (1968), will be used to calculate the exact powersof three types of tests. Since 0 < F (x) < 1 , G(x) is— o —greater than or equal to F^(x) for all x . Thus we are concerned with one sided tests. The smaller the value of 5(delta), the closer G(x) is to F (x) and the smaller the 1 opower of the test.
We are concerned with the acceptance region:
[ Fn ( x ) < (3 [ F^ (x ) ] , for all x] ( 4 )
where P is a non-decreasing and right continuous specified function on the interval (0 ,1) . Under the alternative
2hypothesis (2 ), the probability of (3) becomes
P (F (x) < (3 [F (x)]). n n — o
THEORY
The probability integral transformation of ^ =Fx (X.) produces a random variable which is the ilb order statistic from the uniform population on the interval (0,l) and therefore U ̂ ̂ is distribution free. This property was stated and proven as below by Gibbons (1971)•
Theorem: Let the random variable X have the cumulativedistributive function . If F^ is continuous, the random variable Y produced by the transformation Y = F̂ . (X ) has the uniform probability distribution over the interval (0 ,1 ).
Proof: Since 0 < F ^ (x) < 1 for all x, we have Fy(y) =0 for y 0 and F^ (y ) = 1 for y 1 . For 0 < y < 1, defineu to be the largest number satisfying F ^ (u ) = y. ThenF (X) < y if and only if X •< u , and it follows that
Fy(y) = P(Y y) by definition= P[FX (X) < y] since Y = FX (X)= P[X < Fx 1 (y )] by taking Fx 1 of each
side with the obvious interpretation
= P[X <c u ] since y = Fx (u ) thenFx 1 (y ) = u
= Fx (u) by definition= y by definition.
Since Fy (y ) = y we have a uniform distribution over theint erval (0 ,1 ) .
The purpose of this paper is to calculate the exact power of several tests. Using the previously stated theorem we are able to determine the exact power of certain alternatives for several tests (3.
Therefore it is sufficient to give a computational method for evaluating the function:
Pn[(3] E Prob [U > p"1 (i) , j = 1, 2 . . . n] (5)
where , U^, •••, U^ is an ordered sample from theuniform distribution (0 ,l) and the inverse function (3 ̂ is uniquely determined by
P ̂ (S) = min[T >_ 0 such that (3 (T) >_ S ] ,
because of the assumption that (3 is now decreasing and right continuous.
Computational MethodU . is a random variable from the uniform distribu- J
tion on the interval (0.1) . Let u . = {3 For a given’ J nU 1 U 2 Un-1Un , the conditional distribution of g— , ^— , •••, -- isn n n
that of an ordered sample from the uniform distribution on(0.1) and the density function of U is nu11 . We will ’ nevaluate the function (5 ) by letting
Prob[Uj > u j , j = 1,2,...n] = f ̂ui ’u2 ’* * * Un^ (^ )
for n = 1 ̂ f ^ ) = 1- u , and for n = 2,3,...,
" 2 ' = J lf„ - l (̂ S ’- - - ^ )un'l d u - (7)un
For example:
1 u.f2 (ui ’u2 ) = 2 J’ fi (i r )udu
U2
1 U= 2 f (1 - ) uduJ u
U22= 1 - 2u1 + 2u i u 2 - u2
f3 (ui ’u2 ’u 3 ) = 3 T f2 (i T ’i r )u2duu 3
21 2u 2u u u Q= 3 1 (1- ~ + - i r ;r),V duU ̂ 2 2
2 3= 1 - 3u]L + 6u 1u 2 - 3u 2 -
2 2 + 3u]lu^ - 6u1u2u^ + 3u2 u^.
A more direct expression was shown by Suzuki (1968)For ease of calculation of (6 ) we may proceed as follows:Let Q = 1 and for k = 1, 2, ..., leto
6
Qk = Qk (uV U2 ’*--’Uk )
(8)
Then for n = 1 , 2 ,
n nfn (ul ’U2 ’1--’Un ) = tS„ (k ) Qk (9)k =0
For example: Q t = -u
«2 = U22'iQi1=0
- U 2 2 q o - 2 U 2Q 1
= - u22 + 2u2Ul
S ' - j ' i '
- " u 33qo _ 3u32qi " 3u 3Q2o 2 2= + 3u^ u1 + 3u ^u 2 - 6u ^u 2u 1
fl(ul ) = 9kk =0
= Qo + Q 1
= 1 -i
Although it was only shown for f (u^), f u^), andf3(ul , u2 , U 3) that the more direct expressions of (8 ) and (9 ) equal the expression (?), it can be verified by an inductive proof that the two equations are equal for any
TYPES OF TESTS
The computational methods discussed and the testing situation described by (1 ) and (2 ) allow us to define the significance level (size) of the test (3 to be equal to
1 - fn [u1 , u2 , ... un ] (1 0 )
and the power of the test (1-type II error) to be equal to
1 - fn [0 (U;L) , 0 (u2 ) , ... 0 (un )] (11)where
u . = (3 "̂ (— ) = min[T > 0 such that (3(T) > — ] (12)i n — — nfor i = 1 , 2 , • • • , n and for
10(u.) = G F "*" (u . ) = u .1+6 . (13)1 0 1 1
Therefore when u for any test is determined, the level and the power of the test can be calculated. The main purpose of this paper is to calculate the exact powers for three types of tests that meet the requirements for the acceptance region (4). The powers of these tests are listed for n = 2 through 20 (see Appendix) for a = .01, .02, .03,.04, .05, .1 0 , and .2 0 ; and for 6 = 0 , .2 , .4, .6 , and 1 .0 .
The first test (3 (1 ) suggested by Suzuki (1968) is a non-linear function. Wald and Wolfowitz (1939) treated the non-linear case but their method was restrictive because of
the integral calculations e Anderson and Darling (1952)
treated the non-linear case but their method was also
restrictive due to the nature of limiting distribution of
the integral o The other tests |3 (2) , (3 (2A) , and (3(3) dis
cussed in this paper are linear functions which appear in
Kolmogorov-Smirnov OC-statistics or ratio-type statistics
as discussed by Birnbaum and Tingey (1951) ̂ Chang Li-Chien
(1955)9 and Suzuki (1 967)° Tests (3(2) and (3 (2A) are the
classical tests discussed in most books and articles.
TEST (3(1)
Test (3 (1) is a non-linear function defined as:
(3 (1) [ T ] = (3(1)[T,R] = min[RVf,l] for fixed R > 1.
Solving equation (12) for (3 (1)u^ = min[T :> 0 such that (3 (1) [T] > — ]
= min[T 2> 0 such that min[RN/T,l] >_ —■]
2 i2= min[T 0 such that R T — — ]n
i.2= min[T > 0 such that T > — — ]n R
i2n 2R 2
since i, n, and R are :> 1
. 2By substituting u . = — ^— — into equations (8), we obtain
1 n R “
It can easily be shown that (— -— — )^ can be factored out ,n R
thus
Qk = (n 2R 2 >kk — 1 .E (k ) (k2 )k "1QT
i=0 1 . 1
where k -1 .Z ( ) (k ) Q*
i =0 1 1is independent of n and R.
10
(14)
(15)
11Equation (9) becomes
f = E O (— — -̂)k Q*n k =0 k n 2R 2 k
by letting x = -~R
f„'= k = (J2 )k Q,k -0 n
By equation (10) we know that the size of the test (level) a = 1 - f . So for a given CX and n (sample size) we would have a polynomial of size n with one unknown (x). The roots of the polynomial were calculated for x using
1 1 /2Bairstow's approximation method. By solving R(ocin) = (— ) we obtain the value R for equation (l4). The solutions for a = .01, .02, .0 3 , .04, .05, .10, and .20 and for n = 2through 20 are tabulated in Table 1. Thus, after determining the value of R, the power of the test (3 (1) can be calculated using the methods discussed by letting
i2u . =1 n 2R 2
12Table 1. Table of R(Oc, n) Values for n = 2 to 20
nAlph a Levels ( Ct)
.01 .02 .03 .04 .05 . 10 . 20
2 7.1401 5.0954 4 .1968 3 .6648 3.3040 2.4195 1.80713 5.8507 4.1916 3.4667 3.0402 2.7528 2.0588 1.59314 5.0763 3-6451 3.0226 2.6583 2 .4i43 1.8351 1 .46055 4.5457 3.2689 2.7156 2.3936 2.1792 1.6797 1.36986 4.1528 2.9897 2.4872 2.1962 2 .0037 1.5646 1 . 30417 3.8470 2.7717 2.3086 2.04l6 l .8663 1.4758 1 .25488 3.6001 2.5955 2.1639 1 .9164 1.7551 1 .4054 1.21699 3.3953 2.4492 2.0437 1.8123 1.6628 l .3487 1.1871
10 3.2220 2.3252 1.9416 1.7240 1.5848 1.3023 1.163311 3.0727 2.2183 1.8537 1.6479 1.5180 1 .2642 1.144112 2.9425 2.1249 1.7768 1.5817 l .4601 1.2327 1 .128413 2.8275 2.0425 1.7089 1.5233 1.4095 l .2065 1.1153l4 2.7250 1.9689 1.6483 1.4714 l .3664 1.1845 1.104515 2.6329 1.9028 1.5939 1.4251 1.3285 1.1661 1.0952l6 2.5496 1.8430 1.5446 1.3836 1.2922 1.1505 1.087417 2.4737 1.7884 1.4998 1 .3462 l .2622 1.1372 1.080718 2.4o 42 1.7385 1.4588 1.3126 1.2360 1.1259 1.0?4819 2.3402 1.6925 1.4212 1 .2824 1.2133 1.1161 1.069720 2.2811 1.6500 1 .3865 1.2554 1.1935 1.1076 1.0652
TEST (3(2)
Test (3(2) is a linear function defined as:
(3(2) [T] = (3(2)[T,e] = min[T+e,l] for c > 0 (15)
Solving equation (12) for (3(2)
u^ = min [T > 0 such that (3(2)[T] — ]
= min [T > 0 such that min[T+e,l] — ]n
= min [T > 0 such that min[T,l-e] ^ ” e]
o, for — < c 7 n —
Birnbaum and Tingey (1951) showed that
[n(l-g)] . .P [ P ( 2) (® ; e ) ] = 1 - e Z (~)(l-G-ji)n J (e+J-) J ,j=0 j n n
where []is the Gauss notation. By inverse interpolation they found values of e such that
P n [ P ( 2 ) ( o ; e ) ] = l-oc
for various n (sample size) and oc. They also reported that the asymptotic value
14
which is derived by the asymptotic formula2
lim P [ (3( 2) (• ] = 1 - e 2en— “̂oo n n±/Z
is a little greater than the exact value of e so that the error committed by using e(cx,n) instead of e would be in the safe direction.
The asymptotic values of e(oc,n) are tabulated in Tables 2 and 3• By substituting the asymptotic value e (oc ,n) for e, the power of the test (3(2) can be calculated using the methods discussed with
I 0, for ^ < e(ot,n)u i =
— - g (oc, n ) , for — > g (oc, n ) .
15Table 2 . Table of
to 10 .A (cx , n ) and g (a, n) Values for n = 2
Alpha Levels (a).01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .10 . 20
A(a, 2 ) ***** .9365 . 8728 . 8260 .7886 .6649 .5242e(a, 2 ) ***** .9889 .9363 .8971 .8654 .7587 * .6343A (a, 3) .8482 .7687 .7197 .6835 . 6546 .5582 .4478e (a, 3) .8761 .8075 .7645 .7324 .7066 .6195 .5179A (a, 4) • 7350 . 6685 .6274 • 5970 .5726 .4911 .3974e (a, 4) .7587 .6993 .6621 .6343 .6119' .5365 .4485A (a, 5) .6581 .5999 .5638 .5371 .5156 .4438 . 3610e (a, 5) . 6786 .6255 • 5922 .5674 .5473 .4799 .4012A (a, 6 ) .6015 .5491 .3166 .4925 .4731 . 4082 . 3333= (%, 6 ) .6195 .5710 .5406 0 1 7 9 .4996 .4380 . 3662A (a , 7) • 5575 .5095 .4797 .4575 .4398 . 3801 . 3111e (cx, 7) .5735 .5286 .5005 .4795 . 4626 .4055 .3391A (a , 8 ) .5220 .4775 .4498 . 4292 .4127 .3572 .2930
8 ) .5365 .4945 .4681 .4485 .4327 .3794 .3172A (a , 9) . 4926 .4509 . 4249 .4056 • 3901 .3380 .2777e (a , 9) .5058 . 4662 . 44l4 . 4229 . 4o8o .3577 .2990A(a, 10 ) .4677 . 4283 .4038 .3856 .3709 . 3217 . 2646e (a, 10 ) .4799 . 4423 .4187 . 4012 .3870 . 3393 .2837
16Table 3• Table of
to 2 0 .A(oc, n) and e(0C, n ) Values for n = 11
Alpha Levels ( Oc).01 .02 .03 .04 .05 .10 . 20
A a 11) .4463 . 4089 .3856 .3683 .3544 .3075 .2532e a ’ 1 1) .4575 .4217 .3992 .3825 .3690 .3235 .2705A a, 12) . 4276 .3919 .3697 . 3532 .3398 .2951 . 2432e a, 1 2 ) . 4380 .4037 . 3822 . 3662 .3533 .3097 .2590A a 13) . 4 m .3769 .3556 .3398 .3270 . 2841 .2343e a, 13) .4209 .3879 .3672 .3519 .3394 .2976 .2488A a 14) • 3964 .3635 .3430 .3278 .3155 .2743 . 2264G tx, 14) .4055 .3738 .3539 .3391 .3271 .2868 .2397A a 15) . 3832 .3515 .3317 .3170 .3052 . 2654 . 2192G a, 15) .3918 .3611 .3419 .3276 . 3160 .2770 .2316A Oc l6 ) .3712 . 3406 .3215 .3073 .2958 .2574 .2127G a, l 6 ) .3794 .3496 • 3310 .3172 . 3060 . 2682 .2243A a 17) .3603 .3306 . 3121 . 2984 .2873 .2500 . 2067G a. 17) . 3680 .3392 . 3211 .3077 . 2968 . 2602 .2176A a, 18) .3503 .3215 .3036 . 2902 .2794 . 2432 .2012G a. 1 8) • 3577 .3296 .3121 . 2990 . 2885 .2529 . 2114A a 19) .3411 .3131 .2957 .2827 .2722 .2370 .1961G a, 19) . 3481 .3209 . 3038 .2910 .2808 .2462 .2058A Oc 20) .3326 .3054 .2884 .2757 .2655 .2313 .1914G a. 20) . 3393 .3127 . 2961 .2837 .2737 .2399 . 2006
TEST (3(2A)
Miller (1956) added a correction factor to the asymptotic value of e(oc,n) which results in a better approximation. The new approximation of e is given by
.11143. The values of A(oc,n) are tabulated in Tables 2 and 3 • By listing the values of A (oc 1n) and e(oc,n) together it can easily be noted that:
1 • A(ot,n) is always less than e(oc,n).
2. The larger the n (sample size), the smaller thedifference is between A (oc ,n) and e(ot, n) .
3* The larger the Oc. the larger the difference isbetween A (OC, n ) and e(oc, n) .
By substituting A(oc ,n) for e, the power of the test (3 (2A) can be calculated using the methods discussed with
3/2M (17)
n
with M = .O9037(log10oc)3>/2 + .01515 (log10oc)2 - .08467 oc
0, for — < A(oc,n)
ni A (oc ,n) , for ~ > A(oc,n) . .
17
TEST (3(3)
Test (3(3) is a linear function defined as:
P(3)[T] = (3(3)[T,C] = min[CT,l] for C > 1 (l8 )
Solving equation (12) for (3(3):
u . = niin[T > 0 such that (3 ( 3) [T ] > —_L — — 11
= minf T > 0 such that minfCT 1 ] > —— u ’ -1 — n
= min[T > 0 such that min[T,i-] >
= ct *
Chang Li-Chien (1955) proved that for any n and a the coefficient C(a,n) which gives the test with size OC is given directly by
c(a,n) = i (19)
It should be noted that C(oc,n) is independent of n (sample size) and that for all concerned values of OC (i.e.,0 <_&<.!), C(ot,n) > 1 by substituting C (a , n ) for C, the power of the test (3(3) can be calculated using the methods discussed with
Oci
18
COMPARISON OF TESTS
Three types of graphical comparisons are made inFigures 1 through 9• The first comparison (Figures 1-3)plots the minimum value of T (which is the acceptancelimit) with the corresponding value of ~ for n = 5 , 1 0 , and20. If F (x ) is less than the minimum T value, the null n 1hypothesis is accepted. The second comparison (Figures 4-6) plots the exact power of the tests with the corresponding value of oc for n = 5, 10, and 20 . The third comparison (Figures 7-9) plots the exact power of the tests with the corresponding values of n (sample size) for oc =.0 1 , .0 5 , and .2 0 .
The power of the test (3(2) is in all cases less than the power of the test (3 (2A ) . This illustrates that the correction factor suggested by Miller (1956) to improve the asymptotic value of e(oc,n) does give a better approximation of g . Test (3 (1 ) is superior in all cases to test (3(3)* Test (3 (1 ) is uniformly better than test (3 (2A ) except in the case of small oc and large n (sample size).
19
3 | H*
20
1.0(3(3)P d i P(2A)
.4 6 .8l 2 3 5 .7 .9 1.0Minimum T Value
Figure 1. Acceptance Region for a = .05 and n = 5
•H | ti
21
1.0P(2)-//VVP(2A)
Minimum T ValueFigure 2. Acceptance Region for oc = .05 and n = 10
3 | H*
22
1.0
(3( 2A)(3(2)
4 6 81 2 • 3 5 7 9 1.0Minimum T Value
Figure 3• Acceptance Region for a = .05 and n = 20
Power
of Te
st23
1
6 4 -
(3(1)
(3(2A)(3(2)
.02 .04 .06 .08 .10 .12 .14 .16 .18 .20oc (Level)
Figure 4. Power of Test for n = 5
Power
of Te
st24
1 .
9--
(3(1)
(3( 2A)5 — (3(2)
.02 .04 .06 .08 .10 .12 .14 .16 .18 .20oc (Level)
Figure 5• Power of Test for n = 10
Power
of Te
st25
1 .
(3 ( 2A ){3(1)
9(2)
6- —
.02 .04 .06 .08 .10 .12 .14 16 18 20a (Level)
Figure 6. Power of Test for n = 20
Power
of Te
st26
1.0
(3(1)
(3( 2A)(3(2)
14 16 184 6 8 12 202 10n (Sample Size)
Figure 7 • Power of Test for OC = .01
Power
of Te
st27
1 .
7— —
(3(1)
(3 ( 2A)(3(2)
184 6 14 168 2010 122n (Sample Size)
Figure 8. Power of Test for a = .05
Power
of Te
st28
1.0
9—
(3(1)
(3(2A)(3(2)
4 6 8 16 182 10 12 20n (Sample Size)
Figure 9• Power of Test for a = .20
APPENDIX
TABLES FOR THE EXACT POWERS
29
Table 4. Table for the Exact Powers of the Test |3 (I ) ofSize 2.
Level (a) 6 |3(1) 9(2) f3(2A) 9(3)
b H .0 .0100 .0000 .0038 .0100. 2 .0243 .0000 .0096 .0241.4 .0457 .0000 .0186 .0451• 6 .0732 .0000 .0306 .0720.8 .1052 .0000 .0451 .1032
1.0 .1401 .0000 .0615 .1373
b to .0 .0200 .0001 .0158 .0200. 2 .0434 .0005 .0315 .0429.4 .0750 .0016 .0516 .0737. 6 .1126 .0036 .0747 .1102
' .8 .1536 .0067 .0997 .15021.0 .1963 .0111 .1255 .1917
.03 .0 .0300 . 004l .0279 .0300. 2 .0608 .0102 .0507 .0601.4 .1000 .0196 .0776 .0981. 6 .1444 .0320 . 1068 .1412.8 .1912 .0469 .1370 . 1866
1.0 .2383 .0637 .1671 .2325.04 .0 .o4oo .0106 .0395 . 0400
. 2 .0772 .0226 .0677 .0762
.4 .1225 .0389 .0995 .1201
.6 .1720 .0583 .1327 .1681
.8 .2228 .0800 .1661 .21751 .0 .2729 .1029 .1988 . 2663
.05 .0 .0500 .0181 .0505 .0500.2 .0928 .0353 .0831 .0916.4 .1432 .0570 .1185 . l4o4• 6 .1968 .0815 .1547 .1924.8 .2506 .1077 .1904 .2447
1.0 .3027 .1346 .2247 .2955.10 .0 .1000 .0582 .0988 .1000
.2 .1639 .0935 .1454 .1621
.4 .2309 .1312 .1915 .2272• 6 .2961 .1691 .2354 .2908.8 .3573 . 2060 .2765 .3507
1.0 .4133 .24.13 . 3144 .4058
Table 4.--Continued31
Level (a) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3 ( 2 A ) (3(3)
.20 .0 . 2000 .1337 .1785 . 2000.2 .2865 .1870 .2379 .2852.4 .3665 .2376 .2920 . 3642• 6 .4376 .2844 . 3406 .4346.8 .4997 .3270 .3839 .4962
1.0 .5534 .3657 .4225 .5496
Table 5 • Table for the Exact Powers of the Test (3(1) ofSize 3•
Level (PO 6 (3(1) 9 ( 2 ) (3(2A) (3(3)
.01 .0 .0100 .0019 .0089 .0100.2 .0261 .0054 .0196 .0258.4 .0517 .0114 .0343 .0505. 6 .0857 .0199 .0523 . 0 8 3 2.8 .1262 .0308 .0726 .1221
1.0 .1709 . 0 4 3 6 .0944 .1650.02 .0 .0200 .0071 .0186 .0200
. 2 .0467 .0163 .0362 .0458
.4 .0849 .0293 .0581 .0823• 6 .1318 .0455 .0829 .1269.8 .1840 .0642 .1094 .1766
1 . 0 .2386 .0845 .1365 . 2 2 8 7
.03 . 0 .0300 .0131 .0275 .0300. 2 .0656 .0269 .0501 .o64i.4 .1135 .0451 . 0 7 6 9 .1094. 6 .1690 .0665 .1059 .1620.8 .2285 . 0 8 9 8 .1360 . 2184
1 . 0 .2885 .1143 .1660 .2756.04 . 0 .0400 .0192 . 0 3 5 9 . 0 4 0 0
. 2 .0833 .0370 . 0 6 2 5 . 0 8 1 3
.4 .1388 . 0 5 9 3 .0929 . 1 3 3 6
.6 . 2011 .0844 .1250 .1924
.8 .2655 . 1 1 1 1 .1575 .25351 . 0 . 3289 .1384 . 1 8 9 5 . 3140
.05 . 0 .0500 .0253 .0446 .0500.2 . 1 0 0 2 .0466 .0763 • 0977.4 .1621 . 0 7 2 2 .1128 .1560• 6 .2296 .1003 . 1 5 2 0 . 2 1 9 6.8 .2977 .1295 .1925 . 2842
1 . 0 . 3 6 3 3 . 1 5 8 9 .2330 .3470
or-i . 0 . 1 0 0 0 .0592 .0959 . 1 0 0 0.2 .1764 . 0 9 9 5 .1527 . 1 7 2 2. 4 .2594 .1452 .2129 .2505• 6 .3411 .1933 .2726 . 3282.8 .4171 .2417 . 3 2 9 6 .4013
1 . 0 .4857 . 2890 .3827 .4679
33Table 5*— Continued
Level ((X) 5 P(i) (3(2) £( 2A) (3(3)
.20 .0 .2000 .1464 .1948 . 2000.2 .304? . 2184 .2765 • 3010.4 .4032 .2895 .3531 . 3 9 6 6.6 .4903 .3561 . 4220 .4817.8 .5649 .4167 . 4829 .5552
1 .0 .6277 .4711 .5360 .6175
Table 6. Table for the Exact Powers of the Test (3(1) ofSize 4.
Level (a) 6 (3(1) 9(2) (3( 2A ) 9(3)
.01 .0 .0100 .0034 . 0 0 8 6 .0100. 2 .0275 .0087 .0198 .0270.4 .0564 .0172 .0363 .0547. 6 .0959 .0286 .0577 .0922.8 .143? .0424 .0831 .1374
1.0 .1970 .0582 .1115 .1878
b to .0 .0200 .0085 .0185 .0200. 2 .0493 .0197 .0392 .o48o.4 .0929 .0362 .0674 . 0 8 9 1• 6 .1478 .0575 .1014 .1403.8 . 2096 .0828 .1391 . 1 9 8 0
1.0 .2743 .1111 . 1 7 8 8 . 2 5 8 7
.03 .0 .0300 .0148 .0286 .0300.2 .0693 .0323 .0573 .0671.4 .1242 .0569 .0940 .1181• 6 .1896 .0870 .1359 .1787.8 .2600 .1212 .1806 . 2440
1 .0 .3308 .1579 . 2260 . 3104.04 .0 .0400 .0218 .0387 .0400
.2 .0882 .0453 .0740 . 0 8 5 1
.4 .1523 .0766 .1172 .1442
. 6 .2255 .1136 .1648 .2117
.8 .3017 .1540 . 214o . 28241.0 .3762 .1959 . 2628 .3523
.05 .0 .0500 .0291 .0486 .0500.2 .1061 .0581 .0895 .1022.4 .1780 .0951 .1379 .1681. 6 .2573 .1374 . 1 8 9 8 . 2411.8 .3376 .1824 . 2422 .3157
1.0 . 4i 42 . 2280 .2933 .3879.10 .0 .1000 .0670 .0950 .1000
. 2 .1868 .1169 .1558 . 1 7 9 9.4 . 2 8 3 5 .1729 . 2203 .2687• 6 .3790 .2307 .2841 . 3 5 7 6.8 .4670 .2872 . 3446 . 4409
1.0 .5449 . 3408 . 4008 .5160
35Table 6.— Continued
Level (oc) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3 ( 2A ) (3(3)
to o . 0 . 2 0 0 0 .1484 .1941 . 2 0 0 0. 2 • 3195 . 2 3 0 2 .2884 .3132.4 .4333 . 3 1 2 8 • 3790 .4217. 6 .5328 • 3910 . 46io . 5 1 8 0. 8 . 6 1 6 3 .4623 • 5329 .5999
1 . 0 .684? .5258 • 5950 . 6 6 8 0
Table 7. Table for the Exact Powers of the Test (3(1) ofSize 5•
Level (a) 6 |3(1) (3(2) (3(2A) (3(3)
.01 .0 .0100 .0042 .0092 .0100.2 .0286 .0115 .0228 .0280.4 .o6o4 .0241 .0436 .0582• 6 .1048 .04i8 .0706 .0999.8 .1591 .0643 .1024 .1506
1.0 .2200 .0905 .1373 .2075.02 .0 .0200 .0103 .0188 .0200
. 2 .0514 .0250 .04i6 .0498
.4 .0998 .0472 .0732 .0946
. 6 .1618 .0757 .1115 .1515
.8 . 2322 .1088 .1541 .21621 .0 .3059 .1450 .1992 . 2843
•03 .0 .0300 .0168 .0284 .0300. 2 .0724 .0378 .0596 .0696.4 .1337 .0673 .1010 .1255. 6 .2078 .1033 .1495 .1927.8 .2879 .1435 . 2021 .2657
1.0 . 3682 .1861 .2560 .3399.04 .0 ,o4oo .0237 .0383 .o4oo
. 2 .0923 .0508 .0772 .0882
.4 . i64i .0876 .1270 .1530• 6 .2473 .1314 .1835 .2279.8 .3338 .1796 . 2428 .3067
1.0 .4178 .2297 . 3020 .3845.05 .0 .0500 .0309 .0483 .0500
.2 .1112 .0642 .0943 .1059
.4 .1919 .1079 .1510 .1782• 6 . 2821 .1586 .2135 .2592.8 •3730 .2131 .2775 . 3422
1.0 .4589 .2687 . 3400 . 4221.10 .0 .1000 .0706 .0979 .1000
.2 .1959 .1297 .1698 .1861
.4 . 3049 .1983 .2485 .2837• 6 .4126 .2700 .3269 .38191 .8 .5105 . 3403 .4oo8 .47361.0 . 5 9 5 3 . 4o64 .4682 .5553
Table 7•— Continued37
Level (a) 6 P(i) 9(2) 9(2A) 9(3)
to o .0 . 2000 .1530 .1926 .2000.2 . 3322 .2435 .2953 .3231.4 .4588 .3343 .3950 .4424. 6 .5685 .4187 .4854 .5477.8 .6585 . 4940 .5642 .6359
1.0 .7300 .5598 .6314 • 7077
38
Table 8 . Table for Size 6 .
the Exact Powers of the Test (3(1) of
Level (oc) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3(2A) 9(3)
.01 .0 .0100 .0047 .0093 .0100. 2 .0296 .0136 .0244 .0289.4 .0639 .0290 .0487 .0612• 6 .1127 .0512 .0815 .1066.8 .1730 .0794 .1209 .1623
1 .0 . 24o 8 .1126 .1649 . 2249
b to .0 .0200 .0111 .0191 .0200. 2 .0533 .0286 .0453 .0513.4 .1059 .0560 .0833 .0995.6 .1744 .0921 .1304 .1614.8 .2527 .1349 .1831 .2322
1.0 .3345 .1818 .2383 .3069.03 .0 .0300 .0182 .0290 .0300
.2 .0752 .0434 .0642 .0717
.4 .1421 .0803 .1119 .1318
. 6 .2243 .1262 .1680 . 2049
.8 .3134 .1780 .2281 .28471.0 .4021 .2324 . 2888 .3656
.04 .0 .0400 .0255 .0387 .0400.2 .0959 .0577 .0815 .0908.4 .1748 .1023 .1372 .1605. 6 .2672 .1555 .2003 .2421.8 .3632 .2133 . 2664 . 3280
1.0 .4553 .2725 .3319 .4124
.05 .0 .0500 .0330 .0484 .0500. 2 .1158 .0714 .0984 .1090.4 .2047 .1224 .1615 .1869• 6 . 3048 .1813 .2315 .2749.8 .4054 .2436 .3033 .3652
1 .0 .4991 .3058 .3732 .4517.10 .0 .1000 .0725 .0980 .1000
.2 . 2042 .1385 .1776 .1914
.4 .3245 .2166 . 2669 .2967
. 6 .4430 .2987 .3566 .4029
.8 .5492 .3791 .4408 .50161 .0 .6391 .4541 .5167 .5885
Table 8.— Continued39
Level (a) 6 P(l) 9(2) (3 ( 2A ) 9(3)
to o . 0 . 2 0 0 0 . 1 5 8 1 .1949 . 2 0 0 0. 2 .3431 . 2 6 1 2 .3078 .3315.4 . 48io . 3 6 5 8 .4169 .4600. 6 .5991 .4625 .5142 .5728. 8 . 6 9 3 7 .5475 .5970 .66591.0 . 7 6 6 8 . 6 1 9 9 .6659 .7400
ko
Table 9• Table for the Size 7•
Exact Powers of the Test 9(1) of
Level (cx) 6 p(i) 9(2) 9(2A) 9(3).01 .0 .0100 .0052 .0094 .0100
.2 .0304 .0159 .0261 .0296
.4 .0670 .0349 .0536 . 0 6 3 9• 6 .1199 .0625 .0912 .1126.8 .1858 .0974 . 1 366 . 1 7 2 8
1 .0 • 2599 •1379 . 1 8 7 2 .2407
b to .0 .0200 .0119 .0192 .0200.2 .0549 .0318 .0478 . 0 5 2 6.4 .1114 .0637 .0908 .1038• 6 .i860 . 1 0 6 3 .1451 .1702.8 .2716 .1568 . 2064 .2466
1 .0 . 3608 . 2121 .2709 .3271•03 .0 .0300 .0191 .0291 .0300
. 2 .0776 .0475 .0679 .0735.4 .1499 .0903 .1225 .1373• 6 .2397 .1444 . 1 8 7 8 .2158.8 .3369 .2056 . 2 5 8 3 .3017
1.0 .4332 .2699 . 3294 .3885.04 .0 .o4oo .0266 .0390 .0400
. 2 .0992 .0629 .0866 .0931.4 .1847 .1149 .1504 .1672
. 6 .2857 .1777 . 2 2 3 6 .2546
.8 .3904 . 2463 .2998 • 34691.0 .4898 .3161 .3745 .4372
.05 . 0 .0500 .0343 .0489 .0500. 2 .1200 .0779 . 1042 .1117.4 .2166 .1376 .1754 .1945.6 . 3261 .2073 .2544 . 2889.8 .4354 . 2811 . 3346 . 3 8 5 6
1.0 . 5 3 5 8 .3544 .4113 .4777
oH .0 .1000 .0745 .0979 . 1000. 2 .2118 .1469 .1839 .1960.4 . 3 4 2 8 .2336 .2819 .3080• 6 .4711 • 3245 . 3 8 0 5 . 4214.8 .5842 .4125 .4726 . 5 2 6 0
1.0 .6776 .4936 .5546 .6171
Table 9•— Continued
Level (a) 6 p ( D p(2 ) p(2A) p(3)
to o . 0 . 2 0 0 0 .1609 .1964 . 2 0 0 0. 2 0525 .2742 . 3204 .3388.4 .5003 . 3902 . 4412 .4754. 6 .6254 .4968 .5479 .5946. 8 .7233 . 5 8 9 0 . 6 3 7 2 .6914
1 . 0 .7969 .6659 .7096 . 7 6 6 9
42Table 10. Table for
Size 8.the Exact Powers of the Test (3(1) of
Level (a) 5 (3(1) 9(2) P(2A) 9(3)
. 0 1 . 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 5 6 . 0 0 9 5 .0100.2 . 0 3 1 2 . 0 1 7 7 . 0 2 7 9 . 0 3 0 3.4 . 0 6 9 9 .0403 . 0 5 9 4 . 0 6 6 3• 6 . 1 2 6 5 . 0 7 3 7 . 1 0 3 1 . 1 1 8 0.8 . 1 9 7 6 .1164 . 1 5 6 1 . 1 8 2 4
1.0 . 2 7 7 8 . 1 6 5 9 .2147 . 2 5 5 1
.02 .0 .0200 . 0 1 2 5 .0193 .0200. 2 .0563 . 0 3 5 1 .0504 .0538.4 .1165 . 0 7 2 1 . 0 9 8 2 .1076.6 .1967 . 1 2 1 8 .1591 .1783.8 . 2892 . 1 8 0 3 .2279 .25971 .0 .3853 . 2 4 3 6 .2997 .3455
.03 .0 . 0 3 0 0 . 0 1 9 8 .0292 . 0 3 0 0. 2 .0798 . 0 5 1 5 .0711 .0751.4 .1572 . 1 0 0 1 . 1 3 1 6 .1423• 6 .2541 . 1 6 1 7 .2047 .2257.8 .3591 . 2 3 1 2 .2837 .3171
1.0 .4621 . 3 0 3 6 .3629 . 4092.04 .0 .0400 .0274 .0391 .o4oo
.2 .1023 . 0 6 7 6 . 0 9 0 6 . 0 9 5 1.4 .1941 . 1 2 6 1 . 1 6 1 3 . 1 7 3 2
. 6 .3033 .1974 . 2434 . 2 6 6 0
.8 . 4i6l .2749 . 3290 . 36401 .0 . 5 2 1 8 . 3532 .4121 .4594
.05 .0 . 0 5 0 0 .0353 . 0 4 9 0 . 0 5 0 0.2 .1239 . 0 8 3 3 . 1 0 9 1 .1142.4 . 2 2 8 0 .1504 . 1 8 8 3 . 2014. 6 . 3464 .2294 . 2 7 7 1 . 3015.8 .4637 .3127 . 3 6 7 0 .40 39
1.0 . 5 6 9 8 .3947 . 4 5 2 1 .5010.10 .0 .1000 . 0 7 6 3 . 0 9 8 2 .1000
.2 . 3 1 8 9 .1559 . 1 9 0 7 . 2000
.4 . 3 5 9 8 . 2 5 2 2 . 2 9 6 9 . 3 1 8 2
. 6 . 4 9 7 0 .3525 .4033 . 4 3 7 9
.8 . 6 1 5 8 . 4481 • 5015 . 5 4 7 81.0 . 7 1 1 5 .5341 . 5 8 7 6 .6422
43
Table 10.— Continued
Level (cx) 5 P(l) (3(2) P(2A) (3(3)
. 2 0 . 0 . 2 0 0 0 . 1 6 2 8 . 1 9 6 8 . 2 0 0 0. 2 .3607 . 2 8 5 1 .3303 .3453.4 .5172 .4109 . 46io .4891• 6 .6481 .5257 .5756 . 6 1 3 8. 8 .7484 .6233 .6697 .7136
1 . 0 .8218 . 7 0 3 0 . 7442 . 7 8 9 8
44Table 11 Table for
Size 9•the Exact Powers of the Test (3(1) of
Level (a) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3 (2A ) (3(3)
.01 .0 .0100 .0059 .0096 .0100. 2 .0318 .0195 .0295 .0309.4 .0725 .0455 .0647 .0686. 6 .1327 .0843 .1144 .1231.8 .2087 .1341 .1730 .1913
1.0 .2945 .1916 . 2422 .2684.02 .0 .0200 .0130 .0194 .0200
. 2 .0576 .0380 .0531 .0548
.4 .1212 .0803 .1064 .1111• 6 . 2069 .1378 .1747 .1856.8 .3059 .2055 .2516 .2717
1.0 . 4083 .2783 .3309 .3623.03 .0 .0300 .0205 .0293 .0300
.2 .0819 .0555 .0744 .0766
.4 .1640 .1104 . l4o8 .1469
. 6 . 2678 .1802 .2215 .2348
.8 . 3801 .2583 . 3081 • 33121.0 .4893 .3384 . 3942 .4281
.04 .0 .o4oo .0282 .0391 .o4oo.2 .1051 .0722 .0944 .0969.4 .2031 .1374 .1717 .1787.6 . 3202 .2169 . 2618 . 2764.8 .4405 . 3026 .3332 .3796
1.0 .5318 . 3881 .4452 .4796
.05 .0 .0500 .0362 .0490 .0500. 2 .1276 .0885 .1134 .1163.4 .2389 .1627 .1999 .2077• 6 .3659 .2501 .2972 .3130.8 . 4906 . 34l8 .3932 .4207
1.0 .6oi4 .4309 .4871 .5220.10 .0 .1000 .0776 .0986 . 1000
. 2 .2256 . l64o .1980 .2037
.4 .3758 . 2698 .3133 .3275
. 6 .5211 . 3800 .4286 .4529
.8 .6445 . 4839 • 5331 .56731.0 .7415 .5737 .6227 .6645
45
Table 11.--Continued
Level (a) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3( 2A) 9(3)
.20 .0 . 2000 .1645 .1969 . 2000. 2 .3677 .2951 . 3388 • 3512.4 .5319 .4298 .4784 .5015. 6 .6677 .5514 .5994 .6309.8 .7698 .6531 .6971 • 7330
1 .0 .8424 .7341 .7726 .8095
\
46
Table 1 2 . Table forSize 10.
the Exact Powers of the Test (3(1) of
Level (oc) 6 (3(1) 9(2) (3( 2A) 9(3)
.01 .0 .0100 .0061 .0100 .0100. 2 .0325 .0213 .0320 .0314.4 .0749 .0508 .0718 .0706. 6 .1385 .0954 .1284 .1278.8 .2193 .1524 .1971 .1996
1.0 .3104 .2177 .2726 . 2808.02 .0 .0200 .0134 .0200 .0200
. 2 .0589 .0408 .0568 .0558
.4 .1256 .0881 .1162 .1144
.6 .2165 .1528 .1930 .1924
.8 . 3218 .2289 .2791 . 28291.0 .4301 .3101 .3671 .3779
.03 .0 .0300 .0210 .0299 .0300. 2 .0838 .0592 .0790 .0779.4 .1705 .1203 .1526 .1511. 6 . 2809 .1986 .2419 .2431.8 . 4002 . 2860 .3371 .3443
1 .0 .5150 .3747 . 4300 .4455.04 .0 . 0400 .0289 .0399 .o4oo
. 2 .1079 .0768 .0996 .0986
.4 .2117 .1490 .1842 .1838• 6 .3365 .2372 .2827 . 2860.8 .4639 .3317 . 3838 . 3940
1.0 .5801 .4242 .4797 .4981
.05 .0 .0500 .0369 .0498 .0500.2 .1312 .0936 .1190 .1183.4 .2496 .1752 .2131 .2135.6 .3848 .2711 . 3188 .3237.8 .5162 .3706 . 4242 .4361
1.0 .6310 .4658 .5215 .5413.10 .0 .1000 .0780 .0993 . 1000
. 2 .2317 .1713 .2057 .2071
.4 .3907 .2859 . 3304 .3359
. 6 .5432 . 4o48 .4541 .4667
.8 .6704 .5155 .5649 .58501.0 .7678 .6117 .6580 .6844
4?Table 12.— Continued
Level (a) 6 (3(1) 9(2) (3( 2A) 9(3)
. 20 .0 . 2000 . 1662 .1975 . 2000. 2 .3736 .3050 .3477 . 3566.4 .3446 .4479 .4952 .5127. 6 .6848 .5755 .6217 . 6464.8 .7881 .6799 • 7217 .7503
1 .0 .8596 .6713 .7972 . 8266
48
Table 13- Table for Size 1 1 .
the Exact Powers of the Test (3(1) of
Level (a) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3 ( 2A ) (3(3)
.01 .0 .0100 .0063 .0100 .0100. 2 .0330 .0230 .0336 .0319.4 .0772 .0563 .0772 .0725• 6 . i44o .1070 .1398 .1321.8 .2293 .1718 .2157 .2074
1.0 .3254 . 2454 .2983 .2925.02 .0 .0200 .0137 .0200 .0200
. 2 .0600 .0435 .0592 .0567.4 .1298 .0959 .1237 .1174
. 6 . 2258 .1678 .2077 .1988
.8 .3370 .2520 . 3016 .29341.0 .4508 • 3407 .3968 .3925
• 03 .0 .0300 .0214 .0299 .0300. 2 .0856 .0627 .0821 .0791.4 .1768 .1298 .1619 .1551. 6 .2937 . 2162 .2594 .2510.8 .4196 .3119 . 3628 .3565
1.0 .5395 . 4o8i .4627 . 46l6.04 .0 .o4oo .0294 .0399 .0400
. 2 .1105 .0810 .1034 .1001
.4 . 2202 .1601 .1951 .1885
. 6 • 3525 .2570 .3018 .2950
.8 .4864 . 3600 .4105 .40741.0 . 6068 .4597 .5119 .3152
.05 .0 .0500 .0375 .0498 .0500.2 .1346 .0985 .1233 .1201.4 . 2600 .1876 . 2246 .2189. 6 . 4033 .2925 .3383 .3335.8 .5409 . 4002 .4503 .4504
1.0 .6588 .5014 .5521 .5589.10 .0 . 1000 .0796 .0994 .1000
. 2 .2374 .1782 .2117 . 2101
.4 . 4o46 . 3011 .3447 .3438
.6 • 5636 .4279 .4759 .4793.8 .6938 .5444 .5919 .60131.0 .7910 .6437 .6875 .7024
49
Table 13 «--Continued
Level (oc) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3 (2A ) (3(3)
. 20 .0 . 2000 .1677 .1978 . 2000. 2 . 3786 . 3148 • 3557 .3615.4 .5556 . 466l .5108 .5231• 6 .6996 .5991 .6418 .6605.8 .8037 .7055 .7434 .7658
1.0 .8?4l .7863 .8183 .8416
Table l 4 . Table for the Exact Powers of the Test (3(1) ofSize 12.
Level (a) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3( 2A) (3(3)
. 0 1 . 0 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 . 0 1 0 0 . 0 1 0 0. 2 .0336 .0246 .0351 .0324.4 . 0 7 9 4 . 0 6 1 6 .0827 .0743• 6 . 1 4 9 2 .1184 . 1 5 1 6 .1363.8 . 2 3 8 9 .1909 .2352 .2147
1 . 0 .3399 .2727 .3254 .3035. 0 2 . 0 . 0 2 0 0 . 0140 . 0 2 0 0 . 0 2 0 0
. 2 . 0 6 1 1 .0462 .0615 .0575
.4 .1338 . 1 0 3 8 .1313 . 1 2 1 2
. 6 .234? . 1 8 3 1 . 2224 .2048
. 8 .3516 .2753 . 3238 . 30321.0 .4706 .3713 .4253 . 4o6i
.03 . 0 . 0 3 0 0 . 0 2 1 8 .0299 . 0 3 0 0. 2 .0873 . 0 6 6 1 . 0 8 5 2 . 0 8 0 2.4 .1829 .1392 . 1 7 1 0 .1587. 6 . 3 0 6 1 12334 .2762 .2583. 8 . 4383 . 3370 .3870 .3679
1 . 0 . 5 6 2 8 .4397 .4927 .4767.04 . 0 .o4oo .0299 .0399 .0400
. 2 . 1 1 3 0 . 0 8 5 0 . 1 0 7 0 . 1 0 1 6
.4 . 2 2 8 5 . 1 7 0 8 .2055 . 1 9 2 8
. 6 . 3 6 8 1 .2759 . 3204 . 3 0 3 4
. 8 .5083 .3867 .4364 .41991.0 . 6 3 2 3 .4924 . 5 4 3 1 • 5310
.05 .0 . 0 5 0 0 .0381 .0498 . 0 5 0 0. 2 . 1 3 8 1 . 1 0 3 2 . 1 2 7 6 . 1 2 1 8.4 . 2 7 0 4 .1995 . 2 3 6 2 .2239. 6 .4214 . 3 1 2 9 .3580 . 3428. 8 .5647 .4282 .4769 .4637
1.0 .6849 .5349 . 5 8 3 0 .5752.10 . 0 . 1 0 0 0 .o8o4 .0994 . 1 0 0 0
. 2 . 2426 . 1 8 5 0 . 2 1 7 6 .2130
.4 .4173 . 3 1 6 0 • 3584 • 3511. 6 . 5 8 2 2 . 4 5 0 2 .4964 . 4 9 1 1
. 8 .7148 .5715 . 6 1 6 7 .61621.0 . 8 1 1 2 .6729 .7139 . 7 1 8 8
51
Table 14.— Continued
Level (a) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3( 2A) (3(3)
.20 .0 . 2000 .1690 .1981 . 2000. 2 . 3828 . 3242 .3638 . 366O.4 .5651 .4839 .5263 .5327• 6 .7124 .6223 .6615 .6734.8 .8171 .7308 .7640 .7798
1 .0 . 8862 .8108 .8374 .8548
52
Table 15• Table forSize 13•
the Exact Powers of the Test (3(1) of
Level (a) 6 (3(1) 9(2) (3(2A) 9(3)
.01 .0 .0100 .0067 .0100 .0100. 2 .0340 .0262 .0365 .0328.4 .08l4 .0670 .0881 .0759.6 .1543 .1299 .1633 .1402.8 . 2480 .2100 . 2544 .2217
1 .0 • 3537 .2995 .3518 .3139.02 .0 .0200 .0143 .0200 .0200
. 2 .0621 .0488 .0639 .0582
.4 .1376 .1116 .1390 .1229
. 6 .2432 .1985 .2374 .2105
.8 .3657 .2990 . 3461 .31251.0 . 4896 . 4022 .4535 .4189
.03 .0 .0300 .0222 .0299 .0300. 2 .0890 .0695 .0882 .0813.4 .1888 .1487 .1801 .1622• 6 .3182 . 2508 .2927 .2652.8 .4565 . 3620 . 4104 .3786
1 .0 .5852 .4705 .5211 .4907.04 .0 .0400 .0303 .0399 .o4oo
.2 .1155 .0890 .1106 .1029
.4 .2367 . 1814 .2156 .1969• 6 .3835 .2945 . 3382 .3113.8 .5296 .4125 . 4608 .4316
1.0 .6565 .5232 .5719 .5458• 05 .0 .0500 .0386 .0498 .0500
. 2 . l4l4 .1077 .1316 .1234
.4 .2806 . 2111 . 2474 . 2286
. 6 .4392 .3325 . 3770 .3515
.8 .5876 .4547 • 5021 .47611.0 .7095 .5658 .6120 .5904
.10 .0 .1000 .0812 .0994 .1000. 2 .2472 .1916 . 2234 .2157.4 . 4289 .3308 .3718 .3579• 6 .5991 .4720 .5162 .5021.8 .7335 .5976 .64oo .6300
1.0 . 8289 . 7002 .7379 .7337
53
Tab1e 15 • "-Continued
Level (a) 6 (3(1) (3(2) J3( 2A) (3(3)
to o .0 . 2000 .1701 .1983 .2000.2 . 3861 .3329 .3718 .3703.4 • 5733 .5004 .5417 • 5417. 6 .7235 .6436 .6811 .6854.8 .8287 .7533 .7842 .7925
1.0 . 8966 .8321 .8561 . 8666
/
54
Table l 6 . Table for Size 14.
the Exact Powers of the Test (3(1) of
Level (a) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3( 2A) (3(3)
.01 .0 .0100 .0068 .0100 .0100.2 .0345 .0278 .0380 .0332.4 .0834 .0725 .0936 .0775.6 .1591 .1417 .1751 .1439.8 .2569 . 2294 .2735 . 2283
1.0 .3670 .3262 .3776 .3237.02 .0 .0200 .0145 .0200 .0200
.2 .0630 .0513 .0662 .0589
.4 .1413 .1194 .1467 .1254• 6 .2516 .2137 .2525 .2158.8 .3794 . 3220 . 3686 .3213
1.0 .5079 .4319 .4818 . 4310• 03 .0 .0300 .0225 .0299 .0300
. 2 .0906 .0728 .0912 .0823
.4 .1946 .1582 .1892 .1654
. 6 • 3301 . 2682 .3094 .2718
.8 .4743 .3869 .4336 .38871.0 .6067 .5008 .5487 .5040
.04 .0 .o4oo .0307 .0399 .0400.2 .1180 .0929 . ll4i . 104l.4 .2449 .1920 .2258 . 2008. 6 . 3988 .3130 • 3557 . 3187.8 .5504 .4377 . 4843 .4427
1.0 .6796 .5528 .5989 .5597.05 .0 .0499 .0390 .0499 .0500
. 2 .1444 .1121 .1356 .1249.4 . 2902 . 2226 .2583 .2330• 6 .4560 .3518 .3953 .3597.8 .6089 . 4801 .5259 .4878
1.0 .7319 .5948 .6387 .6o46.10 .0 .1000 .0819 .0995 .1000
. 2 .2513 .1980 . 2292 . 2181
.4 .4393 .3452 .3852 . 3644
.6 .6143 .4935 .5356 .5124
.8 .7501 .6229 .6622 .64291.0 .8442 .7263 .7602 .7475
Table l 6 .— Continued55
Level (a) 6 (3(1) 9(2) (3( 2A) 9 ( 3 )
to o . 0 . 2 0 0 0 . 1 7 1 1 .1984 . 2 0 0 0. 2 . 3 8 8 8 . 3411 .3793 .3742.4 . 5 8 0 2 .5159 .5561 .5500• 6 .7332 . 6 6 3 1 . 6 9 9 1 . 6964. 8 . 8 3 8 8 .7735 . 8 0 2 5 . 8o4i
1 . 0 .9034 . 8 3 0 7 . 8 7 2 6 .8771
Table 17 • Table for the Exact Powers of the Test |3 (I ) ofSize 15•
Level (a) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3 ( 2A ) 9(3)
.01 .0 .0100 .0069 .0100 .0100. 2 .0350 .0294 .0395 .0336.4 .0852 .0780 .0992 .0790.6 .1637 .1537 .1871 .1474.8 .2655 .2491 . 2927 .2347
1.0 .3798 • 3531 .4031 .3332.02 .0 .0200 .0147 .0200 .0200
. 2 .0639 .0537 .0685 .0596
.4 .1449 .1271 .1544 .1277
. 6 .2597 . 2288 .2674 .2209
.8 . 3928 . 3446 .3905 .32971.0 .5255 . 46o4 .5090 .4425
.03 .0 .0300 .0228 .0300- .0300. 2 .0921 .0760 .0942 .0832.4 . 2003 .1675 .1984 .1685. 6 .3419 .2853 . 3260 . 2780.8 .4917 . 4112 .4566 . 3984
1.0 .6274 .5301 .5756 .5165.04 .0 ,o4oo .0310 .0399 .0400
. 2 .1204 .0967 .1176 .1053
.4 .2531 . 2026 .2359 .2045
. 6 . 4i4i .3314 • 3731 . 3258
.8 .5707 .4625 .5073 .45311.0 .7017 .5814 .6247 .5727
.05 .0 .0497 .0394 .0499 .0500. 2 .1473 .1164 .1395 .1263.4 .2997 . 2340 .2691 .2372.6 .4723 .3708 .4131 .3674.8 .6293 .5048 .5487 .4989
1.0 .7527 .6223 . 66 36 .6178.10 .0 .1000 .0824 .0995 . 1000
. 2 .2548 . 2042 .2348 .2205.4 .4486 .3592 . 3984 . 3704
. 6 .6279 .5139 .5546 .5221
.8 .7648 .6467 .6838 .65491 .0 .8576 .7505 . 7814 .7601
57Table 17•— Continued
Level (a) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3 ( 2A ) 9(3)
. 20 .0 . 2000 .1719 .1985 . 2000. 2 .3909 .3491 .3864 .3780.4 .5861 .5306 .5697 .5579. 6 .7417 . 68l4 .7157 .7967.8 .8476 .7918 .8188 .814?
1.0 .9130 . 8670 .8868 . 8866
58
Table 1 8 • Table forSize 16.
the Exact Powers of the Test (3(1) of
Level (a) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3 ( 2A) 9(3)
.01 .0 .0100 .0070 .0100 .0100. 2 .0354 . 0 3 0 9 .o4io .0340.4 . 0 8 7 0 .0835 . 1048 . 0 8 0 4• 6 . 1 6 8 2 . 1 6 5 8 . 1 9 9 3 . 1 5 0 8.8 .2738 . 2 6 8 8 . 3 1 2 0 .24071.0 . 3922 .3797 . 4 2 8 5 . 3422
.02 .0 .0200 .0149 .0200 .0200. 2 .0648 .0562 . 0 7 0 8 . 0 6 0 3.4 .1484 .1349 . 1 6 2 1 . 1 3 0 0• 6 . 2 6 7 6 .2439 . 2 8 2 2 . 2 2 5 8.8 .4058 .3669 .4119 . 3376
1.0 .5426 .4880 .5349 .4534.03 .0 . 0 3 0 0 . 0 2 3 0 . 0 3 0 0 . 0 3 0 0
.2 .0936 .0791 . 0 9 7 1 .0841
.4 . 2 0 6 0 .1767 . 2 0 7 4 .1714
. 6 .3536 . 3 0 2 1 . 3424 .2839.8 . 5 0 8 8 .4346 .4791 .40751.0 .6474 • 5579 . 6 0 1 6 .5283.04 .0 .0400 . 0 3 1 3 .0399 .0400
. 2 .1229 .1004 .1211 .1064
.4 . 26l4 . 2 1 3 0 . 2460 . 2 0 8 0
.6 .4293 . 3494 . 3 9 0 4 .3326
.8 .5906 .4867 .5298 .46311.0 . 7 2 2 8 . 6 0 8 9 .6495 .5850
.05 .0 .0500 .0397 .0499 .0500. 2 .1513 . 1 2 0 6 .1435 . 1 2 7 6.4 .3109 .2453 .2799 . 2412.6 .4905 .3895 .4308 .3748.8 . 6 5 1 0 .5289 .5708 .5093
1 .0 • 7739 .6487 . 6 8 7 2 .6303.10 .0 .1000 . 0 8 3 0 .0996 .1000
. 2 . 2 5 7 8 .2101 . 2403 . 2 2 2 7
.4 . 4 5 6 8 .3727 . 4112 .3762
. 6 .64oi .5334 .5729 . 5 3 1 3.8 .7779 . 6 6 8 9 .7042 . 6 6 6 21.0 . 8 6 9 2 .7723 . 8 0 1 1 . 7 7 1 9
Table 18.— Continued59
Level (oc) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3 ( 2A ) p(3)
to o . 0 . 2 0 0 0 . 1 7 2 8 . 1 9 8 6 . 2 0 0 0. 2 • 3925 . 3 5 6 8 • 3932 .3815.4 • 5912 .5448 . 5 8 2 6 .5653. 6 .7492 .6985 • 7311 .7164. 8 .8553 . 8 0 8 6 .8337 .8245
1 . 0 .9196 .8814 .8994 . 8 9 5 1
I 60Table 19• Table for the
Size 17.Exact Powers of the Test (3(1) of
Level (oc) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3 ( 2A ) (3(3)
.01 .0 .0100 .0071 .0100 .0100. 2 .0358 .0325 .0425 .0343.4 .0887 .0891 .1105 . 0 8 1 8• 6 .1726 .1779 .2115 .1540.8 .2819 .2883 .3313 .2465
1.0 .4043 . 4058 .4536 .3508.02 .0 .0200 .0150 .0200 .0200
. 2 ' .0656 .0586 .0731 .0609
.4 .1518 .1427 .1698 . 1 3 2 2
.6 .2754 .2591 .2970 .2305
.8 .4185 .3891 .4330 .34531.0 / .5592 .5150 .5599 .4638
.03 .0 .0300 .0232 .0300 . 0 3 0 0. 2 .0951 .0822 .1000 .0849.4 .2117 .1859 . 2164 .1742.6 . 3 6 5 3 . 3188 . 3 5 8 5 . 2 8 9 6.8 .5257 .4575 .5007 .4163
1.0 .6668 .5843 .6261 .5395.04 .0 .o4oo . 0 3 1 6 .0399 .o4oo
. 2 . 1 2 5 3 ,io4i .1245 .1074
.4 .2697 .2232 . 2 5 6 0 .2113
. 6 .4444 .3671 . 4074 .3390
.8 .6101 .5099 .5517 .47251.0 .7428 . 6 3 4 7 .6733 . 5 9 6 6
.05 .0 .0500 .o4oo .0499 .0500.2 .1545 .1248 .1474 . 1 2 8 8.4 .3207 . 2564 .2907 .2450. 6 .5067 .4078 .4482 . 3819.8 .6701 .5521 .5923 .5193
1 . 0 .7923 .6738 • 7097 .6420.10 . 0 .1000 .0835 .0996 . 1000
. 2 .2603 .2160 .2457 . 2248
.4 . 464l . 3 8 5 8 . 4236 .3817• 6 .6509 .5520 .5903 .5400.8 .7895 .6896 .7231 .6768
1.0 .8793 .7922 . 8 1 8 9 .7827
6lTable 19•— Continued
Level (a) 6 (3(1) 9(2) (3 ( 2A) 9(3)
.20 .0 . 2000 .1735 .1986 . 2000. 2 .3937 .3643 .4000 .3849.4 • 5955 .5585 .5951 •5723. 6 .7557 .7148 .7457 .7254.8 . 8621 . 8240 .8472 .8335
1.0 .9254 .8943 .9104 .9028
62Table 20 Table for
Size l 8 .the Exact Powers of the Test (3(1) of
Level (a) 6 (3(1) 9(2) (3( 2A) 9(3)
.01 .0 .0100 .0072 .0100 .0100. 2 .0361 .0340 .0439 .0347.4 .0904 .0948 .1163 .0831• 6 .1768 .1902 .2238 .1572.8 .2897 .3079 .3505 .2521
1.0 .4159 .4313 .4780 .3591.02 .0 .0200 .0152 .0200 .0200
. 2 .0664 .0610 .0754 .0614
.4 .1550 .1505 .1775 .1342
. 6 . 2830 .2742 .3117 .2350
.8 .4310 . 4110 .4538 .35261 .0 .5752 .5413 .5841 .4738
.03 .0 .0300 .0234 .0300 .0300. 2 .0966 .0852 .1029 .0857.4 .2174 .1951 .2254 .1769. 6 .3770 .3353 .3743 .2950.8 .5424 .4798 .5217 .4246
1.0 .6855 .6095 .6493 .5302.04 .0 .0400 .0318 .0399 .0400
. 2 .1278 .1077 .1279 . io84
.4 .2782 .2334 . 2658 .2145
.6 .4595 . 3844 . 4240 .34521 .8 .6290 .5322 .5726 .4816
1.0 .7618 .6590 .6956 .6076
• 05 .0 .0500 .0403 .0499 .0500. 2 .1576 .1289 .1512 .1300.4 . 3302 .2673 . 3012 .2487. 6 .5221 .4257 .4652 .3886.8 . 6880 .5744 .6130 .5287
1.0 .8090 .6972 • 7310 .6531.10 .0 .1000 .0839 .0996 .1000
. 2 . 2623 .2217 .2509 . 2268
.4 .4703 .3987 .4357 . 3869• 6 . 6605 .5700 .6069 .5483.8 . 7 9 9 7 .7092 .7408 . 6 86 8
1.0 .8882 .8105 .8351 .7929
Table 20.--Continued63
Level (a) 6 (3(1) 9(2) (3( 2A) 9 (3)
. 20 .0 . 2000 .1742 .1987 . 2000. 2 . 3944 .3717 . 4065 . 388I.4 .5990 .5719 .6072 .5790. 6 .?6l4 .7302 .7594 .7339.8 .8681 .8382 .8596 .8418
1.0 .9304 .9058 .9203 .9098
64
Table 21. Table for the Size 19•
Exact Powers of the Test (3(1) of
Level (a) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3( 2A) 9(3)
.01 .0 .0100 .0073 .0100 .0100.2 .0365 .0335 .0454 .0350.4 .0920 .1005 .1221 .0844• 6 .1809 . 2026 . 2362 .1602.8 .2974 .3274 . 3694 .2575
1 .0 .4273 .4565 .3018 .3670.02 .0 .0200 .0153 .0200 .0200
. 2 .0671 .0634 .0777 .0620
.4 .1583 .1383 .1853 .1362• 6 .2906 . 2892 .3263 .2393.8 .4433 .4324 .4743 .3597
1.0 .5908 .3666 .6076 .4833.03 .0 .0300 .0236 .0300 .0300
. 2 .0980 .0883 .1038 .0863
.4 .2231 . 2043 . 2344 .1795• 6 .3888 .3516 • 3901 .3003.8 .5589 • 3017 .5422 .4327
1 .0 • 7037 .6338 .6714 .5604.04 .0 .0400 .0320 .0399 .o4oo
.2 .1303 .1113 .1313 .1094
.4 . 2866 .2433 .2736 .2176
. 6 .4745 . 4oi4 . 4402 • 3511
.8 .6474 .5538 .5928 . 49021 .0 .7798 .6819 .7163 .6180
ino .0 .0500 .0406 .0499 .0500. 2 .1603 .1329 .1350 .1312.4 • 3391 .2781 .3117 .2521.6 .5367 . 4431 .4818 .3931.8 .7046 .5956 .6328 .3378
1.0 . 8242 .7190 .7509 .6636.10 .0 .1000 .0843 .0996 .1000
.2 .2639 .2274 .2561 .2287
.4 .4738 .4113 .4473 .3919
.6 . 66 90 .5874 .6229 .5362
.8 .8089 .7276 .7574 .69621 .0 . 8960 .8272 .8499 .8023
Table 21.— Continued65
Level (a) 6 (3(1) 9(2) (3( 2A) 9 ( 3 )
.20 .0 . 2000 .1748 . 1 9 8 8 . 2000.2 .3949 . 3 7 8 9 .4130 . 3 9 1 1.4 . 6 0 2 0 . 5 8 4 8 . 6 1 8 9 .5853. 6 .7664 .7449 • 7725 . 7 4 1 9.8 .8734 . 8 5 1 5 .8711 . 8 4 9 6
1 . 0 .9348 . 9 1 6 2 .9290 . 9 1 6 2
66
Table 22. Table forSize 20.
the Exact Powers of the Test (3(1) of
Level (a) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3( 2A) 9 ( 3 )
.01 .0 .0100 .0074 .0100 .0100. 2 .0368 .0370 .0469 .0353.4 .0935 .1062 .1279 .0856.6 .1849 .2150 . 2486 .1631.8 . 3048 .3469 . 3883 .2627
1 .0 .4384 .4812 .5251 .3747.02 .0 .0200 .0155 .0200 .0200
. 2 .0679 . 0 6 5 7 .0800 .0625
.4 . l6l4 .1661 .1930 .1381
. 6 .2980 . 3041 . 3410 .2434
.8 .4554 .4533 .4943 .36651.0 .6061 .5907 .6302 . 4924
. 03 .0 .0300 .0238 .0300 .0300. 2 .0995 .0913 .1087 .0872.4 . 2289 .2134 .2433 .1819. 6 .4006 . 3 6 7 8 .4056 . 3 0 5 3.8 • 5753 .5229 .5621 . 44o4
1 .0 .7213 .6569 .6924 • 5702.04 .0 .o4oo .0322 . 0 3 9 9 .0400
. 2 .1328 .1148 .0346 .1103
.4 .2951 .2535 .2854 .2205
.6 . 4 8 9 2 . 4182 .4562 .3568
.8 .6651 .5747 .6122 .49851.0 .7965 .7037 . 7 3 6 2 .6280
.05 .0 .0500 . o4o8 .0499 .0500.2 .1632 .1369 .1587 .1322.4 .3476 . 2888 . 3220 .2555. 6 .5503 . 4602 .4979 . 4013.8 .7198 .6160 .6517 .5464
1.0 . 8 3 7 9 . 7 3 9 5 . 7 6 9 4 . 6 7 3 6.10 .0 .1000 . 0 8 4 7 .0996 .1000
. 2 .2651 .2329 .2613 .2306
.4 . 4 8 0 5 .4237 .4592 .3967
. 6 . 6766 .6042 .6383 .5637
.8 .8170 .7451 .7731 .70521.0 .9029 .8427 . 8 6 3 4 .8111
67Table 22.— Continued
Level (a) 6 (3(1) (3(2) (3 ( 2A ) 9(3)
.20 .0 . 2000 .1754 .1989 .2000. 2 .3950 .3858 .4194 • 3940.4 .6045 .5973 .6303 .5914. 6 .7709 .7589 .7849 .7495.8 .8782 .8637 .8816 ,8568
1.0 .9388 .9255 .9369 .9220
REFERENCES
Anderson 9 T „ ¥ o , and Darling , D o A o Asymptotic Theory of Certain Goodness of Fit Criteria Based on Stochastic Processes o Annals of Mathematical Statistics 23 (1952) , 193-212.
Birnbaum, Z = W « , and Tingey, F . One Sided ConfidenceContours for Probability Distribution Functions o Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 22 (1951)^592-596.
Chahg Li-Chien <> On the Ratio of an Empirical Distribution Function to the Theoretical Distribution Function» ACTA Mathematica Sinica, 5 (1955), 3^7 -3 6 8.
Gibbons, Jo Do Non Parametric Statistical Inferenceo McGraw-Hill Book Company (1971) , 22-24 o ^
Miller, L o H » Table of Percentage Points of Kolmogorov Statistics o Journal of the'American StatisticalAssociation, 51 (1956), 111-121o
Suzuki, Go On Exact Probabilities of Some Generalized Kolmogorov 1s D-Statistics® Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 19 (196?)> 373-388.
Suzuki, Go Kolmogorov-Smirnov Tests of Fit Based on Some General Bounds* American Statistical Association Journal (1968) , 919-924 *
Wald, A o, and Wolfowitz, J * Confidence Limits forContinuous Distribution Functions o Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 10 (1939) ̂ 105-118 *
68