The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

21
The Political Economy of a Green Revolution Pol376: International Political Economy April 2, 2012 Michael Lee

description

The Political Economy of a Green Revolution. Pol376: International Political Economy April 2, 2012 Michael Lee. Summary . Global Warming Possible solutions Friedman and a “Green New Deal” Obstacles to a Green Revolution Ideational Implementation Political International - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Page 1: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Pol376: International Political EconomyApril 2, 2012Michael Lee

Page 2: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Summary Global Warming Possible solutions Friedman and a “Green New Deal” Obstacles to a Green Revolution

Ideational Implementation Political International

A green opportunity?

Page 3: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Negative externalities of dirty energy consumption

Page 4: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

What are the negative externalities of filling up a tank of gas?

Global warming Other pollutants Foreign policy Petro-dictatorship Complexity

Page 5: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Hot, Flat and Crowded

Rise of China Green new deal Competitive advantage http://video.nytimes.com/video/2007/04/10/m

agazine/1194817107532/the-power-of-green.html

Energy internet Carbon tax/price floors Regulation/incentives

Page 6: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Other approaches to climate change

Doing nothing Cap and trade Government intervention Geo-engineering

Page 7: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Battle of ideas

Climate science Skeptics

Deniers Cornucopians Lomborg

“Climategate” Hockey stick Environmental tradeoffs

Page 8: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Temperature since 1000 CE, multiple sources

Page 9: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Implementation problems

Variable generation, constant demand Government picking winners Green bubbles

Spain Czech Republic

Page 10: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Ontario wind energy as % of capacity: variable energy generation, regular demand

Page 11: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Does a green public lead to green policies? (WVS)

Early 90s Late 90s Late 00s

France 54.4% 37.6% (no data)

China 82.4% 74.3% 73.7%

USA 63.9% 60.9% 49.8%

Canada 63.7% 58.1% 65.7%

Page 12: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Pricing carbon: a tough sell

USA Cap and trade http://politics.nytimes.com/congress/votes/111/hou

se/1/477 Sectoral/regional costs

Canada Green tax shift (carbon tax) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=os5vXksQwts&

feature=relmfu

Page 13: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

If you were building a political coalition of green interests, what would it look like?

Page 14: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Past international efforts

Global collective action problems Montreal protocol (Ozone), 1987 Acid rain treaty (S02, NOx), 1991 http://www.epa.gov/airmarkets/progress/arp03.

html Kyoto protocol (C02), 1997 Copenhagen (C02), 2009

Page 15: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Human C02 emissions since 1850

Page 16: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Why was Kyoto unsuccessful, while previous agreements succeeded?

Page 17: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Country C02/person Status

US 18.9 Signed, did not ratify

Canada 16.9 Ratified, dropped out

Japan 9.8 Failed to meet target

Germany 9.6 Met target

UK 8.9 Exceeded target

France 6 Exceeded target

Page 18: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Are there competitive advantages to going green?

Page 19: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Who has a comparative advantage in solar power?

Page 20: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Annual Average windspeed

Page 21: The Political Economy of a Green Revolution

Summary

Academic consensus may not translate into public acceptance

Hard to implement Tricky international and domestic

distributional politics