The people in the project

36
The people in the project Terese Stenfors-Hayes

description

The people in the project. Terese Stenfors-Hayes. Agenda and objectives. Agenda: Creating and managing a project team. Conflict management, motivation, group dynamics and some leadership theories Objective: Basic understanding of theories for the topics above. Limited time - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The people in the project

Page 1: The people in the project

The people in the project

Terese Stenfors-Hayes

Page 2: The people in the project

Agenda and objectives

• Agenda: Creating and managing a project team.– Conflict management, motivation, group

dynamics and some leadership theories• Objective: Basic understanding of theories

for the topics above.

Page 3: The people in the project

Project manager vs. functional/traditional manager

• Limited time• Only one objective• Given competencies

within the group• Greater risks• Rapid changes• Greater risk of failure• No formal staff

responsibility

• Several objectives to prioritise between

• Staff needs competence development

• Greater distance to employees

• Greater formal power• Needs to obey the rules

and regulations of the organisation

Page 4: The people in the project

The manager’s different roles (Mintzberg)

• Interpersonal– Team leader, ambassador and ceremonial leader

• Informative– Listener, information giver and spokes person

• Decision making– Visionary, problem solver, resurce allocator

and negotiator

Page 5: The people in the project

Leadership• The team paradox• Great person theory

– Something you are born with• Great opportunity theory

– Something you can learn• Ask what the leader does instead of who he is• The more complex a project, the more formal the style

of management should be• The more technically uncertain a project, the more

flexible the style of management should be

Page 6: The people in the project

Leadership styles (Lewin & Lippit)

• Authoritative• Democratic• Laissez-faire

Page 7: The people in the project

Assumptions about humans (Schein)

• Rational-economic assumptions– Related to theory X (McGregor)

• Social assumptions• Self-actualisation assumptions

– Maslow, theory Y (McGregor)• The complicated human

Page 8: The people in the project

Power (French & Raven)

• Legitimate• Reward• Coercive• Expert• Referent

Page 9: The people in the project

How to create a team

Four important aspects• Task• People• Context• Process

Page 10: The people in the project

Task

• What type of task is it?– Tactical– Problem solving– Creative

• Autonomy?• Subjective or objective solution?• Task design for individuals

Page 11: The people in the project

People

• Number?• Competency?

– Technical– Communicative– Problem solving

• Roles?• Diversity?• Status system?• Norms?• Unity?• Cohesiveness?• Trust?

Page 12: The people in the project

Context

• Resurces• Leadership and structure• Feedback and rewards

Page 13: The people in the project

Process

• Aim• Objective• Confidence• Conflict management• Responsibility• Communication• Openness

Page 14: The people in the project

Why work in groups? (Schein)

• Affiliation needs• Sense of identity and maintaining our self-

esteem• Establishing and testing social reality• Reducing insecurity, anxiety and sense of

powerlessness• Problem-solving, task-accomplishing

mechanism

Page 15: The people in the project

Why is it so difficult?

• The work is so temporary • Everyone is used to his/her ways  • Geographical diversity • Size • Cultural diversity • Lack of time

Page 16: The people in the project

Group development

• Forming• Storming• Norming• Performing• Adjourning

Page 17: The people in the project

Characteristics of effective work groups (Mullins 2002)

• A belief in shared aims and objectives• A sense of commitment to the group• Acceptance of group values and norms• A feeling of mutual trust and dependency• Full participation by all members and decision making by

consensus• Free flow of information and communications• The open expression of feelings and disagreements• The resolution of conflict by the members themselves• A lower level of staff turnover, absenteeism, accidents, errors

and complaints

Page 18: The people in the project

Belbin’s 9 team roles

• Specialist• Monitor/evaluator• Plant • Teamworker• Completer/finisher• Shaper• Coordinator• Implementer• Resource investigator

Page 19: The people in the project

Social Loafing

• Ways to avoid it:– Individual results– Fun jobs– Reward and evaluate individuals– Participation in goal creation– Etc…

• …is only a problem when intrinsic motivation is low

Page 20: The people in the project

Groupthink (Janis 1972)• The group feels invulnerable• Warnings are rationalised away• Unquestioned belief in the group’s morality• Opposers are ridiculed and stereotyped• Group pressure on opposers is high• Silence is taken as consent (a false sense of group

unanimity)• Members censor themselves not to deviate from norms• The group is protected from information or individuals

who would disrupt consensus

Page 21: The people in the project

Why do we argue (Lee)?

• Communication problems• Structural design• Personal differences

Page 22: The people in the project

Types of conflics

• Relationship conflicts• Task conflicts• Process conflicts• Conflicts can change from one type to

another. • And in most cases the conflict is

unnecessary

Page 23: The people in the project

Dealing with conflicts

• Five ways:– Accomodation– Confrontation– Compromise– Collaboration– Avoiding

Page 24: The people in the project

Avoiding or changing conflicts

• Strengthen the group identity• Acknowledge individual achievements• Good environment and surroundings• Identify a common goal• Practice conflict management• Separate people, tasks and other issues

Page 25: The people in the project

Why is motivation important?

• To increase employee’s interest in taking an active responsiblity for work tasks and stated goals

• To decrease the number of conflicts, complaints, absence and staff turnover

• To increase ability to handle change and misfortune

• To increase chances to meet business objectives and improve results

Page 26: The people in the project

Kill motivation• Unfair treatment• Little participation• Unrealistic goals• Faulty expectations• Unclear work tasks, rules and goals• Lack of challenges• Bureaucracy• Lack of trust for management• Scandals and doubtful ethics• Too much control and supervision• Internal politics

• Too much or too little to do• Favouring• Uncertainty for the future• Broken promises• Threats• Weak connection between reward

and achievement• Failing communication• Limited responsibilities• No feeling of control

Page 27: The people in the project

Creating motivation• The daily work

• Leadership

• Personal development

• Social relations

• Status and image

• Respect and recognition

• Support for own ideas and initiatives

• ”Speed” of work

• Salary and benefits

• New things happening at the workplace

Page 28: The people in the project

A motivating manager… (Insight Lab AB 2003)

• Self insight and a clear idea• Interest in other people• Active leadership• Clear delegation• Social relations and feeling of togetherness• Support employee’s personal development• Have a vision and be continuously improving

Page 29: The people in the project

Hackman and Oldman’s work design model

Page 30: The people in the project

How is it implemented?

• Combine tasks• Publish results• Let people work in teams• Empower• Open feedback channels

Page 31: The people in the project

Goals•Goals are a motivating force

• Specific goals lead to increased performance

• Difficult goals, when accepted, result in higher output than easy goals

• Participation in setting the goals might motivate further

• Set goals only, not the route to achieve it

•Private and organisational goals might collide•Goals should be:

–Few–Realistic–Agreed–Measured–Explicit

–Specific, time restricted, not relative, positive•Goals need to be part of a vision•MBO is a motivational program based on goal setting

Page 32: The people in the project

Employee recognition• Using different ways to reward behaviour and publicly recognize both

individual and group accomplishment• Can be almost anything…

– A note…– A picture…– A thank you…

• Rewarding behavior with recognition immediately leads to its repetitionrepetition

• To maximize motivation potential, publicly communicatepublicly communicate who and why is being recognized

• Recognizing employee’s superior performance often costs littlecosts little

Page 33: The people in the project

Employee involvement• A participative process to encourage increased

commitment to the organization's success• Involve workers in decisions decisions that will affect them • Increase their autonomyautonomy and control over their work lives • Include techniquestechniques with a common core:

– Employee participation– Participative management– Workplace democracy– Empowerment– Employee ownership

Page 34: The people in the project

Reward programmes

• Based on what an individual values• Timely and clearly linked to a behaviour

– –always or sometimes• Who, why should be publicly and clearly

stated

Page 35: The people in the project

Always evaluate!

• Learn for next time, both from mistakes and successes!– Evaluate the group– Conflict Management– How motivational strategies worked– The work task– The work process– Communication– Etc.

Page 36: The people in the project

Recommended reading

• Essentials of Organizational Behavior– Stephen Robbins