The Origins of the Laws of Nature Bengt Gustafsson: Current problems in Astrophysics Lecture 5...
-
date post
19-Dec-2015 -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
4
Transcript of The Origins of the Laws of Nature Bengt Gustafsson: Current problems in Astrophysics Lecture 5...
The Origins of the Laws of Nature
Bengt Gustafsson:
Current problems in Astrophysics
Lecture 5
Ångström Laboratory, Spring 2010
Reading:
Carter, (1974): Large Number Coincidences and the Anthropic Principle in Cosmology, IAU Symp. 63, 291
Carr & Rees (1979): The Anthropic Principle and the structure of the physical world, Nature 278, 605
Barrow & Tipler (1988): The Anthropic Cosmological Principle, Oxford Univ. Press
Jaffe et al. (2009): Quark Masses: An Environmental Impact Statement, Phys. Rev. D. 79, 5014
Tegmark (1998): Is the theory of everything merely the ultimate ensemble theory, Annals of Physics 270, 1
Davies (2006): The Goldilocks Dilemma, Allen Lane
Further references, see Wikipedia: Anthropic principle
Why is the Universe as it is?A meaningful question in physical science??
Cf ”ignorabimus” -debate (late 19th century)
”What really interests me is if God had any choice in the creation of the World”
QuickTime och enTIFF (okomprimerat)-dekomprimerarekrävs för att kunna se bilden.
Why is the universe so old?
QuickTime och enTIFF (okomprimerat)-dekomprimerare
krävs för att kunna se bilden.
P. Dirac (1937):Why is the present age of the universe~ electron time scale h/(mec2)divided by G = Gmp
2/hc (gravitational fine-structure constant? R. Dicke (1961): Least possible age of stars to produceenough carbon to ”make physicists”~ G
-1 h/(mec2) ~ 1010 years.
”Natural explanation” for Dirac’s”coincidence”
QuickTime och enTIFF (okomprimerat)-dekomprimerare
krävs för att kunna se bilden.
Could the world have been different?
• If we wish to understand why the world is as it is, the existence of observers must be taken into consideration
QuickTime och enTIFF (okomprimerat)-dekomprimerare
krävs för att kunna se bilden.
Brandon Carter
”weak”: location -- in space time”strong”: constants, laws of nature
”Anthropic Principle”
Other examples
12C nuclear structure: Resonance at 7.7 MeVF. Hoyle (1954)
Strong interaction: ±10%
QuickTime och enTIFF (okomprimerat)-dekomprimerare
krävs för att kunna se bilden.
QuickTime och enTIFF (okomprimerat)-dekomprimerare
krävs för att kunna se bilden.
Several examples from
Stellar evolution and Planetary system formation etc in paper by Carr and Rees (1979), and book by Barrow & Tipler (1988)
E.g. conditions for convective, but not allthrough convectivce stars:
G ~ 20 (fine structure constant = e2/hc) G larger => all stars radiative blue stars, G smaller all stars
red dwarfs with full mixing.
Condition for neutrinos to blow off SN envelope: G ~ W4 (W
= gme2c/h3). W slightly smaller => all H He in Big
Bang.
Further examples
• Cosmology:
- speed in expansion and isotropy (Collins & Hawking
1973), c.f. inflation
- cosmological constant (Weinberg 1987)
- string landscape (Susskind 2003)
QuickTime och enTIFF (okomprimerat)-dekomprimerare
krävs för att kunna se bilden.
> 10700 worlds?
Further examples
• Moon (tides, convection in Earth?)
• Jupiter (water on Earth)
• Grav ~ 1/r2
• 3 space dimensions
• Ice density
• …
Formulations by Barrow and Tipler (1986)
• WP: The observed values of all physical and cosmological quantities are not equally probable but take their values restricted by the requirement that there exist sites where carbon-based life can evolve and by the requirement that
the Universe be old enough for it to have already done so.” • SP: ”The universe must have those properties which
allow life to develop within it at some stage in history.”
Are observers necessary for ”the existence” of the Universe?
”Observers are necessary to bring the Universe into being”
QuickTime och enTIFF (okomprimerat)-dekomprimerare
krävs för att kunna se bilden.
John A. Wheeler
Criticisms:• Empty statements -- truisms or tautologies.• Not fasifiable• Teolological, Aristotelian, ad posteriori. Cause and
effect reversed (Stephen Jay Gould, Michael Shermer)• ”Anthropic” misleading. ”Carbon chauvinism”.
Just complexity?• ”Principle” misleading. Selection effects.• SAP discourages searches for physical explanations.
”It tends to be invoked by theorists whenever they do not have a good enough theory to explain the observedfacts” (Penrose)
• ”Just-so-stories” - lowered level of ambition in scientific explanation.
QuickTime och enTIFF (okomprimerat)-dekomprimerare
krävs för att kunna se bilden.
The best of worlds?
• Leibniz: Theodicée (1710).
• Voltire (Candide):
”Please, note that noses are made to carry glasses, thus we wear glasses. Feet are obviously created to have shoes, thus we wear shoes. Stones are formed to be cut to building blocks in castles, thus Your Grace has such a beautiful castle.”
QuickTime och enTIFF (okomprimerat)-dekomprimerare
krävs för att kunna se bilden.
Many-world theories
• Nicolaus Cusanus (1401-1464)
• Hugh Everett ( 1956)
• Wheeler (1960)
• String landscape …QuickTime och en
TIFF (okomprimerat)-dekomprimerarekrävs för att kunna se bilden.
QuickTime och enTIFF (okomprimerat)-dekomprimerarekrävs för att kunna se bilden.
QuickTime och enTIFF (okomprimerat)-dekomprimerare
krävs för att kunna se bilden.
Andrei Linde: Chaotic inflation
”So much in vain”(Martin Rees)
More criticims
• Not falsifiable (”Do we see them?”)
• Inifinity not necessarily = all possible worlds
Recent developments
• Mapping what worlds could be there:
Jaffe et al. (2009): Could 12C form with other quark masses? (u, d, s).
md ~2 mu (mn ~ 1.001mp)
<
Recent developments
• Mapping what worlds could be there:
Jaffe et al. (2009): Could 12C form with other quark masses? (u, d, s).
md ~2 mu (mn ~ 1.001mp)
1H no longer stable, but 2H and 3H might be as well as 14C.
< 0.99
Can a ”weak less” universe give life?
• Jenkins, Perez, LBNL group (2010):
p+p reactions impossible
Small ajustment of matter/antimatter ratio
=> 2H in BB.
Stars could shine by 2H+p 3He + and further nucleosynthesis possible.
Counterfactual history, also sometimes referred to as virtual history, is a recen form of historiography which attempts to answer "what if" questions known as counterfactuals. It seeks to explore history and historical incidents by means of extrapolating a timeline in which certain key historical events did not happen or had an outcome which was different from that which did in fact occur.The purpose of this exercise is to ascertain the relativeimportance of the event, incident or person the counterfactual hypothesis is negating. For instance, to the counterfactual claim "What would have happened had Hitler drunk coffee instead of tea on the afternoon he committed suicide?", the timeline would have remained unchanged — Hitler in all likelihood still would have committed suicide on April 30, 1945, regardless of what he had to drink that afternoon. However, to the counterfactual "What would have happened had Hitler died in the July, 1944, assassination attempt?", all sorts of possibilities become readily apparent, starting with the reasonable assumption that the German generals would have in all likelihood sued for peace, bringing an early end to World War II, at least in the European Theater. Thus, the counterfactual brings into sharp relief the importance of Hitler as an individual and how his personal fate shaped the course of the war and, ultimately, of world history.