div class=trans-pagebutton class=gotoPage data-page=1Page 1button div class=trans-imageimg data-url=documentthe-organisms-designated-schizophyta-no-2-and-no-3-were-compared-with-archaeothrixhtmlpage=1 data-page=1 class=trans-thumb lazyload alt=Page 1: · The organisms designated Schizophyta NO 2 and NO 3 were compared with Archaeothrix contexta and A oscillatoriformis and While they were regarded as possible fungal hyphae loading=lazy src=data:imagegifbase64iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAAEAAAABCAQAAAC1HAwCAAAAC0lEQVR42mM8Uw8AAh0BTZud3BwAAAAASUVORK5CYII= data-src=https:reader034fdocumentsinreader034viewer20220507165e262dc1781848173f1f793ahtml5thumbnails1jpg width=140 height=200 divdivdiv class=trans-pagebutton class=gotoPage data-page=2Page 2button div class=trans-imageimg data-url=documentthe-organisms-designated-schizophyta-no-2-and-no-3-were-compared-with-archaeothrixhtmlpage=2 data-page=2 class=trans-thumb lazyload alt=Page 2: · The organisms designated Schizophyta NO 2 and NO 3 were compared with Archaeothrix contexta and A oscillatoriformis and While they were regarded as possible fungal hyphae loading=lazy src=data:imagegifbase64iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAAEAAAABCAQAAAC1HAwCAAAAC0lEQVR42mM8Uw8AAh0BTZud3BwAAAAASUVORK5CYII= data-src=https:reader034fdocumentsinreader034viewer20220507165e262dc1781848173f1f793ahtml5thumbnails2jpg width=140 height=200 divdivdiv class=trans-pagebutton class=gotoPage data-page=3Page 3button div class=trans-imageimg data-url=documentthe-organisms-designated-schizophyta-no-2-and-no-3-were-compared-with-archaeothrixhtmlpage=3 data-page=3 class=trans-thumb lazyload alt=Page 3: · The organisms designated Schizophyta NO 2 and NO 3 were compared with Archaeothrix contexta and A oscillatoriformis and While they were regarded as possible fungal hyphae loading=lazy src=data:imagegifbase64iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAAEAAAABCAQAAAC1HAwCAAAAC0lEQVR42mM8Uw8AAh0BTZud3BwAAAAASUVORK5CYII=...