THE OF - Library and Archives · PDF filennd gdnrrce throt cg fr this research project. He...
Transcript of THE OF - Library and Archives · PDF filennd gdnrrce throt cg fr this research project. He...
THE UNlVERSITY OF MANITOBA
PROXIMITY EFFECT & THE THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES OF SUPERLATTICE SYSTEMS-
A Thesis Subxnitted to the F a d t y of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulnllnent of the Reqwrments
for the Degree of
MASTER OF SCIENCE
DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS
WINNIPEG, MANITOBA
P-8PZEZ-Z CS-O
-anbyon3qa ~mxuoj ms no ~atded ms n o ~ m p o ~ d a
ap ~ p i p g o m I m ap amro~ q snos as?¶ ana3 ap sardos sap
no Janqwp 'x&d Caqnp~~dal: aP ePeaa3 nP a h o p a ~ a n b a ~ 0 1 1 ~ 8
Q 8 3-a-d a p p x a uou a3mq am ap~oaae s marne,?
A ~ d d P r a c t i c a m submitted to the FamIfy otGrrduate Studies of the Unircnity of Manitoba i padal farnirmcnt of the requltcmcats for the dcgree of
r
Permission ha$ bcta gmnted to the LIBRARY OF TH& üMVERSlTY OF kUrWOBA to leod or scll copies of tbis thuidpracticum, to the NATIONAL LIBR-Y OF CAVADA to microfilm tbis thesir/pmcticum and
to [end ut sel1 copies of the film, and to IRWERSiTY MiCROffLMS tic. to pubtish 3n abstract of this thaidpmcticum,
This reproduction or copy of thb thesis h u bcea made availabie by authority of the copyright ow-ner solciy for the purpose of private study and restarcb, and may only be repraduced and copied as permittcd by
copyright hm or with express written authoriatioa from the copyright owntr.
Abstract
A st~crightfonucrnl niethod based on the standard Bor~oliubov eqiatiorrs cris-
ing in the Banleen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) appronch to supercorrdwtivitg is
genemlized to the case whieii the qsteni is not Isomogeneoiis i7h q u e e e . The
gcip epntion is obtnined from the self-consistency condition imnposed on the
pair amplitude for systems composed of layers of diflerent superconducting and
nomal thin films. Some properties of the srjstern are determineci in tenns of
certain parameters ara'sing in the theory, the behavior of which aflo~cis a consis-
tency check on the rnethalî used. S'&al attention is given to the calcuZntiorr
of the transition tempmrture for a single layer, which lead one to conclude that
this method is ualid only for selatively thin superconducting films.
Acknowledgment
I a m cleeply grczteful to mg si~peruisor. Dr. R. L. Ko bes for his eencorrr<ir~emerrt
nnd gdnrrce throt cg fr this research project. He hnd nct+velvJ invo~ved in t fris
research crnd nlso made a~bstcantial contribution to the completion of this thesis.
I have benefited p a t l y in nmny w<qs 6 y workïng with him.
Tllanks is &O due to Mr. .J. Wang for man3 helpfirl discicssions. I (rnr also
qratefiil to the financial stcpport r e c e i d /rom Nntional Science and Engineer-
ing Research Cound of Canada and Department of Phvsics, University of
Manitoba.
Finally, I would like to express rny gratitude to m y fantily for their constant
support thmughout the dumtion of this research.
Contents
1 Introduction 2
2 Minoscopic Theory 9
1 B c ~ i c Properties of Siipercontliictors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.1 A New Conclensecl State . - . . . - . , . . . . . . . . . 10
1.2 M i e E t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 12
1.3 E-xistence of Energy Gap . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2 BCS Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - 17
2.1 Reditceci Hamiltonian , . . . . . , . . . , . . . . + . . 20
2.2 CooperPairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
2.3 Superconducting Ground State . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
2-4 Cdculation nt Finite Temperature , . . . . . . . . . . 29
3 Pioximity Effect 36
1 Theoretical Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
1.1 'Leakage' of Cooper Pairs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
1.2 Cooper Liuiit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1.3 Mague t ic Aspcc ts of t ke Prosiuù t - EErc-t . . . . . . . .
1 4 Naguetic Field Behnvior . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 De Genries- Werthamer Solution for Dirty Materials . . . . . .
3 McMÏllan Ttinnelùig Mode1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4 Single Superconducting Film
1 The Energy Eigenstates . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 The Pair -hplitiicie and the Self-Consistent Gap Eqrtatiou . .
3 Thinlcness Depenclence of the Critical Temperature . . . . . .
3- 1 -4 Calcidation Close to the Criticd Temperatrire . . .
3 -2 Wunerical Result . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - -
4 The Thichess Dependence of the Gap Parameter . . . . . . .
5 Finite Superlattice System
1 The Solution of Bogoliubov Equation and Gap Eqitation . . .
2 Reducetl Thickness Depenclence of the Rechced Cri t ical Tem-
perature . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . .
3 The Behavior of the Energy Gaps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1 A Calculation of &')/A(') at Zero Temperature . . . .
3 -2 A Calculation of h ( j ) / ~ ( j - ~ ) and A ( ~ ) / A ( ~ ) at Finite
Temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . .
6 A Wew Model" of the Sinde Layer
1 Phpic-a1 .lIoctel . . - . - - . - - - . . . - . - - . . . . . . - - . 4 T1ii~:kness Depeucleucc of the Self-Cousistent Gap Eqiiation .
2-1 A Cdctilation of the Critical Thichess at Zero Tem-
peratiire . . . . - - - - . - - - - - - - . - - - - - - . . - 2.2 Thickness Dependence of the Critical Temperature . .
3 Cornparison ancl Disciission . . . . - . . . . . . . - - . . . . .
3.1 Critical Tliichess . . . - . . . . - . . - - . . . . - - . . 3.2 Infinite Supcrlat tice . . . . . . . . . - - . . - . . - . - .
4 S i t m n i ' ~ . . . . . - . . . - . - - - . - - * . - . . - - . * - . -
List of Figures
2.1 The electronic specific heat C of a sriperconcluctor (in zero mag-
netic field) as a fimction of temperature . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.2 The bfesissner effect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.3 The magnetization curve of two types of superconchctors . . .
2.4 A tunneling junction between normal metal and a supercondiic-
tor When S is sitperconcliicting (T << Ta) ancl also when S is
normal (T > T). CVhen T << To, to extract one electron from
the superconducting condensate require a minimum energy A
2.5 Electron-phone interaction attractive . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2.6 Curve showing A(T)/A(O) vs.T/Tc . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3.1 Tunneling mode1 with a normal metal and a superconductor
separated by a a potential barrier and with the BCS potential
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (dash lines constant in each metal)
4.1 Single superconcluctor layer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
4.2 The assu.mec1 form of the pair amplitude . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Fiuite sitpcrlnt ticc system
The -4ssti1riccl fonn of the pair amplit ticlc . . . . . . . . . .
The clepenclence of the recliicecl traosition temperat iwe T/Tc on
t lie t kickncss alac . soiici line represents single layer. Dash linc
represents ?ï = 100, Dash-dot line represents N = U), Dash-
dot-clottecl h e represents N = 10 for b/ck = 0.05 Siiperlattice
Tlie clepenclence of the recliicecl t rami tion temperat lire T'/Tc
ou the tliickness n/u,. Solicl Line represents single layer. Dash
line represents bln, = 5, Dash-clot line represents b la , = 0.5.
Dasli-dot-dot ted line represents b/n, = 0.05 For N= IO finite
siiperlat tice - . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The gap parameter ratio A ( ~ ) / A ( O ) forN = 40, bla, = 0.01, at
zero temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The gap parameter ratio A(j)/&O) forN = 10, bla, = 0.01, at
zero temperat lue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The gap parameter ratio A ( ~ ) / A ( O ) ~ forN = 40, bln, = 0.5, at
zero temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
The gap parameter ratio forN = 10, bla, = 0.5, at
zero temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.i.9 Tlw gap paraiiic8tt8r r ~ t i o A ( ; ) / ~ ( J - ' ) for-\- = 40. 6 / r t , . = 0.01.
at fiiiitc tc8rupcrcztirw . . . - . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . .
.3.LO The gap parnuirter ratio L(J)/A(') forS = 40. blci, = 0.01. At
Fiiiite Terirpemttwe . . - . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
5.1 1 The Gap Panmeter Ratio A(j)/LdU' for:\- = 40. bln, = 0.5. at
finite temperature . . . . . . . . . . . , . . - - . . . . . . . .
G.12 The gap paraiiieter ratio A(j)/&*) forN = 10. blcc, = 0.5. at
finite temperature . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.1 Gap paranieter tlepenclence on spatial . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
6.2 The critical temperature clepencleucc on the thickness for New
Moclel . , , . . . . . . . . . , . . . , . , - * . . * - . . - - . -
6.3 The dependence of the recliicecl transition temperature T/Tc
on the Thickness a/ac for iiifhite superlat ticeSolid line repre-
sents single layer. Dash iine represents b/a, = 5. Dotilash line
remesents bla, = 0.5. Dash-dot-clotted re~resents bln, = 0.05
Chapter 1
Introduction
The p r o M W effect, which is the mutual idhience of a superconducting
aud normal film being in metallic contact, has been stiicliecl extensively. both
t Leoretically as well as experimentally. The fin t esceriments stiggesting the
existence of a proximity effect on a scale ,$ - l000A were perfomccl very
early by Meissner [l], who measured supercurrents flowing between two su-
perconducting wires separated by a thin gold layer (cieposited on one of the
wires) and found the superconducting transition temperature decreased below
the bulk value with decreasing film thickness. Then Smith et d[2] reported
that the Tc of Ag-Pb superimposeci films decreased with the thickness of the
normal hg film, dN, the thickness of the superconductor, clS, being kept con-
stant. They also showed that the induced gap in the normal metal is much
smdler than that of a pure superconductor's vahe. However Rose Innes ancl
Serin [3] pointed out from their work on Au/% sanclwiches that this effect
niiglit he clue in p ~ r t to the infliieuce of intcmctallic mupoiintk. -4 \-arir& of
ot livr phenouieua t hat are cai~sed by t Le prosiuiity effect Liaw dso beeu Co tiud
(e.g. the transition temperature of site11 a contact d l be n fitnctiou of the two
Eihs' t hickness involvecl and thnt it c m vasy continuoiisly fiorn the transition
temperature of one film to the one of the other film).
Mter t hese e.upcrimentaI observationst several t heoreticd t reat nients of
vanous aspects of the pro.uimity effect were proposecl. The k t a r i c l siuplest
case is clisciissecl by Cooper of a thin Normal (N) and Siiperconcliicting (S)
films [4]. Since Cooper-pairs as weU as impairecl electrons WU clrift fiom one
film into the other with such a contact. a theorist wishing to describe sirch
systerns is confronted wit h the inherent inhomogeneity of the sitiiat ion, which
leacls for instance to a spatially varying pair potentid. However, due to its
non-hem natitre, the BCS theory is cLifFcult to solve for geometrîes other
t han the infinite homogeneous case. As this is a problem in which the spatial
inhomogeneity of the system is essential, the Gov'kov propagator formalism
[5], which based on Landau-Ginzburg theory , is particdarly appropriate, for
instance, in calculating the cntical temperature as a function of film thickness
[6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Il], but it is only valid near the transition temperature.
In order to treat the inhomogeneous problern in general, two general a p
proaches c m be used. One is that the pair amplitude is assumed to have
some convenient hm, and a solution to the Bogoli~ibov eyuations is obtained.
Properties of the system c m be then foiml in terms of the free parameters
assoriatccl nit li the a ~ ~ ~ i t u e c I auptit ucle. Ln uitich of t lie Literat lire t lir- as-
siiuircl Fomi of the auiplitucle is an appropriate cous t w t over a certain regiou
[12. 13. 14. It, 161. siucc t k s pemits a relative- stnightfomC~cI solittiori.
Iriiplicit in this approack is the couclition that the assimiecl <mcl cdcitiat-
cd mplitiicles are close in some sense, so that the solution is "neasly self-
cousistent" [lï. 181.
. b o t her somewhat more generd technicpe which explkit ?y incorpora t es
a self-consistency conclition is a varïationd type of approach. Here. one begins
as More by assiunhg a particuliu form of the pair amplitude and so l~ing
the residtwit ecpiations. The free parameters associatecl with the assumeci
amplit iide are t hen cleterminecl by a conclition siich as t lie minimizat ion of t Le
free energy [l9] or that the assitmect ancl calc~datecl pak amplititde agree as
closely as possible. In both of those approaches it is possible to consider more
general forms for the pair amplitucle by employing a W C 8 type of expansion
[20], which has the effect of reducing the Bogoliubov equations to a system of
first-order equations, t hese being generally easier to hanclle.
In t his t hesis we shall at temp t two different models of incorporating part ic-
ular geometries other then the W t e homogeneous situation into the kame-
work of the BCS theory to study the prolcimity effect. Chapter Two of the
thesis begins with a brief discussion of the general properties of superconduc-
tors and reviews some aspects of the BCS theory which are generalIy acceptecl
as the standard theory of clescnbing stiperconditcting system.
Chapter Three rontains some geuerai rcuiarh al~oiit t l i ~ prosiriiity
t'ffc~t. atirl cIcsc~-ihcs two mz~jor theorcticd tseatnictits of it. Ouc of tlimc is th<.
approwh ofcle Geunes for c l i r t y niaterids, d o entcusivcly clcveloped a theon
of t lie prosimi- effect n-lùch shows lion- the niii tiial influence of two films whicL
are in coutact can be clescribec1 by appropriate boiinclazy conclitious for the
pair potential A(r) at the interface and at the metal-vaciiuni hoitnclary. It is
especially simple in this approach if the si~perconcltictiiig film is in contact wit li
a magnetic h. siich as Fe, Ni, or Co. Anotlier well-known approacli to the
problem of two clissidar metals jouiecl at a Bat siirface, somewhat clifferent
from t h approaches mentioned in the prececling clisciission, is the tctnneling
mocLeL of Mch1il.lC~ [21]. In this approach a potential barrier is assiimecl to
exist at the interface hetween the two met& ancl the ttinneling thrûiigh the
bamer is treated by means of the transfer Hamihonian methocl [22, 231. The
mode1 h a . the aclvantage that it is not restrictecl to the vicinity of the critical
point.
Starting from Chapter Four, we introduce a somewhat different iine of
approach with regard to the self-consistency of the pair amplitude, which was
successfidly presentecl by Kobes and Whitehead in 1987 [24] The approach
shares some of the characteristics of the methods descnbed in the prececling
discussion but uses a self-consistency condition Iess stringent t han clemancLing
that the assumed and calculatecl pair amplitudes exactly coincicle. To be spe-
cifie, we first work on the simplest geometry: a single siiperconclucting film
iusitkt a uoniial uirtal. Li. prrsrnt t k griierd soltitiou to t l i ~ Bogo1iiil)ol-
qiiiitions. wliirh wi1l dso hc uscd for the Eiuitr siiperlattire systciu to be s t t d
ifcl later. The first appro.shatious made in tLis Chapter is t h wr. assiiui~ the
pair arnplitiicle is coustant nritlua the supercondiicting regiou. and for the self-
consistency condition we recpÏre that the spatial average of the assiuiied ancl
t lie calcdated orcler parameter be eclual. In orcler to sirnplify tlie dgebra we
assime t h the Fermi velocity , the Debye ternperatiires, etc. are the swiie for
hoth metals, ancl we assume the transmission ancl reflection coefficients at the
interface to be imity. This approach. while simple, provides a stnightforwarcl
methocl for the single film system for both critical mcl noncritical properties
with no paranieters outside of those foimd in the BCS theory In the last
section of this Chapter, we solve the gap fimction nnd get the clepentlence of
the critical temperature on the film thichess. As a consequence many of tlie
resiilts containecl in t his analysis can be expressecl in terms of certain riniversal
resiilts which are independent of the particidar material in question.
Although the particular geornetry described above is relatively simple and
has been extensively studied in other approaches, other geometries, such as
siiperlattices composed of alternating layers of normal and supercondiicting
metal, are also of interest, especidy experimentally. In Chapter Five, we
apply the same approach discussed in Chapter Four to a finite superlattice
system. We consider a clean superlattice with 1 > <(T), where 1 is the mean
fiee path and <(T) is the temperature dependent coherence length. The system
is (-ouiposecl ol i&ut ical supcrco~icliictors of widt li 20 srpara t d I - I~L>.CLS of
rioimal uietd of wicltl 26 at the s = O plane. ?\ë clctemint~ soue propcrtics
of the system in tenns of the ratios ci/n, and T/Tc, prticiilarly the rriticd
t eniperat lire. and uw t his to in part icidar examine t lie cpiest ion of when siicli a
firiite system c m reasonabiy apptoxhnate a tnie infinite superlattice. FVe also
examine the behavior of the energy gap parameters. We first consicler the gap
paramter ratio A(~)/A(') at zero temperatine, where j labels the particiilar
film, aud then we consicler this ratio at finite teniperatiu-e. The behavior of
t his ratio nfforcis a consistency check on the met hocls usecl.
In Chapter Six, we clisciiss an approach to the case of a single supercon-
cluc ting Iayer ~Iiscussecl earlier baseci on the met ho& of the previoiis chap ter.
In particitlar. we arbitrarily ctivicle the siiperconcliicting layer into " 21V + 1"
zones, <mcl then self-consistently cdcdate the gap parameter in each zone. CVe
then let 'W' go to infinity and the width "aT7 of each zone go to zero, but keep
the total widt h of the superconductor constant:
An essential advantage in this approach is the hope that the gap parameter
of the single layer can have some "spatial" depcnclence, being peaked near the
center and dying off somewhat towards the edges. We s h d mauily concentrate
on the determination of Tc a s a fimction of the superconducting layerTs width,
particularly aroiuicl Tc = O. We shall finci that the results for the critical
t h - l a t s at T, = O gct cnhariced 1 - a, factor -5-S0 owr that of carlier
ruode1 cliscitssccl prwioiis- It tiims out that the rt.;idts ol~tzlined 1- t h uc8u-
ruocle1 czre uot riuiwrsd. in t i n t they ciepencl ou the particitlcar niaterid in
cpest ion,
The bi ik of the materid of the thesis is embocliecl in Chapters 4, 5, ancl
6. whch is the p r o d t y effect of the siiperconcl~ictor for ciifferent geonietries
iuvcst igatecl. One of t Le purposes of the t hesis is to inclicate how the results ive
fiud compare with other approaches. We d clo siich a cornparison at the end
of t lie thesis. Ultimately we give a brief s i t m m - of the resdts O btaineci
ancl present some conclirsions.
Chapter 2
Microscopic Theory
It is weU known that at stifficiently low temperatures many metals and doys
iinclergo a phase transition to a Superconducting state. In orcler to itncler-
stnncl the mechanism of siiperconcluctivity several macroscopic tlieories, siich
as London's theory, Ginzberg's theory, ancl so on, were presentecl. It took a
long time to k c l the origin of the superconductivity becanse of the extreme-
ly s m d energy Merence between the normal and the superconcliic tive s tate.
In 1950 H.Frohlich [25] suggested that the electron-phonon interaction, which
implies an attractive electron-electron interaction, was responsible for the su-
perconductivity. This was confirmed by the discovery of the isotope effect . In
1956 Cooper showed that the Fermi sea is unstable against pair formation when
there exists any attractive interaction between electrons, no matter how weak.
About a half century later after the initial discovery of superconductivity, a
microscopic theory was completecl by Bardeen, Cooper and Schridffer in 1957,
1 Basic Properties of Superconductors
Si~percoucltictivity was chscoverecl by Heike Kamerlingh Onnes in 19 I l who
foiincl that niercitry loses its resistance at -MI<. Others then foiincl the es-
is tence of O t her siiperconclt~ctors, particidarly mcmy metds ancl alloys. As
the temperature npproaches a critical temperatilie Tc, the met& ancl dloys
tinclergo a phase transition fiom a state of normal electncal resistivity to a
siiperconclucting state. In this state, the properties of the metais are raclicai-
ly clifferent from their properties in the normal state. We sunun&ze t h e e
features which the basic properties of supercondiictivity rely on.
1 . A New Condensed State
FVe take a piece of tin and cool it h m ; at a temperature Tc = 3.71(, we
fincl a specific heat anomaly. The electronic specific heat C,, in the normal
state varies linearly with the temperature. However, the specific heat Cs in
the siiperconducting state initially exceeds C, for T 5 Tc, but below Tc the
Figure 2.1 : The elertronic specinc heat C of il siiperconcliict or (in zero iiiag~-~e t ic
field) as n fi~nction of temperature
specific heat drops below Cn ancl vanisiles exponentially as T approaching zero.
Below T c the tin is in a new thennodynamical state. FVhat lias happenecl?
It is not a change in the ciystallographic stnictiire. as far as ,Y rays c m
tell. It is not a ferromagnetic, or antiferrornagnetic, transition. The striliing
new property is that the tin has zero electrical resistance. (For instance, a
current inducecl in a t h ring has been observecl to persist over times > 1 year)
W'e say the t h , in this particular phase, is a superconductor, and we cal1
the permanent current a supercurrent.
Another important puzzle was the smahess of the condensation energy.
If, as seemed Likely, the condensation was purely electronic in nature, why
was the condensation energy not comparable in magnitude with the Fermi
energy? The free energy Fs in the superconducting phase c m be derivecl h-om
tlic specifir k a t chta. F,. for the normal met&. Thc cliffcreur~ (F, - F,JT=u
is callecl the condensation energy. It is uot of ortlcr kBTu per elrctrou: it
Ls. in f x t . mtch suialier. of orcler (ksTo)2/EF. wlicre EF is the Fenui cnergy
of the çonclttction electrou in the nomal wctd. T_vpirally EF - Tel-' aucl
ksTo - 10-"eV, and o d y a fraction LeTo/EF ( N IO-^) of the metallic electrons
have their energy significantly moclified by the conclensation process. But. iu
spite of the smallness of the energy clifference, many of the properties of the
siiperconcli~cting phase are very clïfferent fkoom those of the nomai phase.
1.2 Meissner Effect
In itself, the vaniçhing of the resistance has not lecl to a goocl unclerstancling
of the phenomenon of siiperconcluctivity- The important tliscovery, in this re-
spect, is the so-callecl Meissner effect, cliscoverecl by Meissner and Ochsen-
felcl in 1933. In the Meissner effect an appliecl magnetic flax was expellecl
from the superconductor, independent of whether the fieIc1 was applied in the
superconduc t ive state ( " zero-field-cooled" ) or already in the normal state(
" field-cooled" ) . This also shows an important ditference between a perfect
conductor and a superconductor in the presence of a magnetic field. The per-
fect conduct ivity, ( R d ) , - alone is not sufncient to describe superconductors.
We also need perfect diamagnetism (B=O).
The behavior observed by Meissner and Ochsenfeldis sigmficantly mers
fiom that which woidci occur at the transition to a state of perfect concluctor,
T'Tc
Figure 2.2: The Mesissner effect
iri which the magnetic state clepencls on history: In the field-cooled case, the
niagnetic BILY present in the normal state woilld be fiozen in, and this would
represent the eqrulibrim s tate. In the zero-field-coolecl c~ase, on the o tlier
hancl, a magnetic field switchecl on in the perfectly conducing state would give
rise to induction currents keeping the interior flitu-free, but this wodd repre-
sent a metastable state: consequently, at the transition back to the nonnal
state, the induction currents woukl die out with Joule dissipation, Le. this
transition would in gened be an irreversible process.
In contrast, according to the Meissner effect, the magnetic state of a
superconduc tor is uniquely determinecl by the applied magnetic field. The flm-
fiee state is the equilibrium state, and the screening currents vanish without
any dissipation when the transition back to the normal state takes place, which
thus becomes completely reversible.
Furthemore, a clear distinction should be made between the Meissner
I &
L A
Meissnet ! i ! -Noma&
B c l Bc B c 2
Figure 2.3: The magnetization cime of two types of siipercondrictors
screening cinent keeping the bulk of the superconcliictor Bu-free, which is
an eqdibrium phenouenon, and the persistent current associatecl with a non-
vanishing BILY through a superconducting loop, which represents a metastable
state, no matter for how long it persists.
Extension of experiments to superconducting alloys led to the discovery of
type II superconductors. Type II superconductor are chaxacterized by two
different critical fields: flux penetration sets in at a critical field Hci(T), which
is mrich smaller than the critical field Ha(T) for fidl restoration of resistivity.
Type 1 superconductor flux penetration and resistive behavior occurs a t the
same cntical field Hc(T) .
.lriot her importiiucr fmt tire of sirpcrroucliir tirity is the esisteuw of a gap
in the Iow energy escitatious. The niagnïtiicle of the cnergy gap is ahotit
10--'eV . Thc existence of this gap Lias been relate<[ by BCS to the fomatiou
of condeosecl pairs of electrous. In most stiperconcliictors it is riecessary iu
order to cteate an electron-hole pair close to the Fermi siuface to fi~rnish au
e u e r s ~~~r > >A, wliere A is the so-cdecl energy gap.
The existence of a gap in 10%- energy e x i t ations was firdy est ablishecl b -
a large nimber of e-cperinients. The five main source of experimental eviclence
For an gap in superconcliictors are:
A (a). The low-temperature specific heat is proportional to exp( - -).
As mentionecl previoiisly, at low temperature the contrïbiition of the con-
cliiction electrons to the specific heat in the supercondiicting state is propor-
tionai to e - A / f ' ~ T . It is very hard to understand such a temperatiue clepen-
ctence except as a consequence of an energy gap. If there is an energy gap then
as the temperature is raised, the electrons are thermally excited across the
gap and for each of these electrons an amount of energy equal to the energy
gap A. is absorbed in the process. When the temperature increases, and A.
decreases, the gap vanïshes at T = Tc. The width of the gap is of the order of
~ B Z -
(b). The electromagnetic absorption in the far infrarecl occurs only for
photons of enrrgy 2 U.
(c). The spin-lattice relnsritiou of uiiclear spius procrrcls prerlouùuuitl-
iu an Uiteract ion with the concliirtiori elect rom and Lias fi-eqiieucy pmport ional
to erp( - l / k s T ) .
(d) . Iu tilt rasouic at teniiat ion, the phouon is of low kequency ancl cimiio t
clecay by creation of a pair of excitations. Biit it czm be absorbecl by collisions
with a preexisting excitation. T h process is proportional to the nimbes of
J prcesis ting excitations. ancl t hiis to e z - ( - ) - (e). Tunneiling effect.
The most direct nieasurement of the energy gap has been proviclecl by the
work of Giaever (1960). who essentiaily measiml the width of the gap with
a voltnieter. He accomplished this by observing the tunneliug of electrons
between a siiperconcliicting film ancl a normal one across a thin insiilating
barrier. Quantiun mechanically, an electron on one side of such a barrier has
a finite probability of tunneliig through it if there is an dowed state of equal
or smail energy available for it on the other side. But, the expriment shows
that t here is no current at low temperature unless we apply a voltage V across
the junction such that energy gain eV is larger than A. The current voltage
characteristic has the form shown in Fig(2.4)
IR 1950, the study of different critical temperatures of vaxious isotopes of
the sarne element [27,28] gave the result that the critical temperatiue for those
This is callecl the isotope effect . This relation h l r s the siiperconcliicting
properties of the nietal to the masses of the ions in thr lattice even thoiigh
the 1at tice itself cloes not change cl~lring the transition. and strongly supports
the belief that the electron-phonon interaction is the origin of the supercon-
cliict ivity.
2 BCS Theory
Before the BCS theory it took a long time to h d the interaction responsible
for the superconcliietivity.esconclcti E-xperimental eviclence pointed to the fact that in
the transition to the superconducting state the lattice and its properties were
essentidy unchanged whereas some of the properties of the condiiction elec-
trons were changed radically. In the first instance, it was to assume that the
transition was caused by a change in the state of the electrons alone. However,
attempts to find a theory based on an independent particle mode1 of the con-
duction electrons did not have the possibi l i~ of evplaining the funclament al
property of superconductors, which is their infinite conductivity.
The firs t successful mode1 of superconductivity was developed by Bardeen,
Cooper, and Schrieffer. They presentecl a theory of superconductivity basecl
normal metal
e O
superconductor
oxide layer
D
normal
Figure 2-4: A tunneling junction between normal metal and a superconductor
When S is superconducting (T << To) and dso when S is normal (T > T).
When T << To, to extract one electron fiom the superconducting condensate
requise a minimum energy A
Figure 2.5: Electron-phone interaction attractive
on electronic pair correlations which was able to accoiint for neariy dl of the
csperuiiental phenornena whicli n siiperconcl~ictor exhïbits. It also answers the
cpestion of wiiat speciilc-particle interaction is responsible for siiperconcliic-
t ivi ty.
An electron in a lattice c m interact with another electron by exchanging
acoustic cluirnta, called phonons. This is referred to as an eiectron-electron
interaction mediatecl by phonons. The exchanged phonons are said to be vir-
tua1 because they are only in existence during the exchange from one electron
to the other, but do not have the posibility of passing away fiom the electron
into the lattice as real phonons.
Such processes can be clescribed as follows: suppose that an electron with
wave vector ki emits a phonon q, and the electron is scattered with a new
wave vector ki - q. The emitted phonon is absorbed by another electron with
wave vector 4, and after absorbing the phonon, the second electron has a new
wavr wctor k2 + q. Of coiuse. it is possible that t lie otlier srai trriug prowss
ocxiirs, wliere the k t electiron absorbs a phonou Mth w w e vertor -q aucl M
scat tcrecl Eroru state ki to ki - q. This phonou is emitted froru t h scroud
rlrrtron wlùch is scattcrecl from state 4 to k2 + q.
Uncler certain conclitions, which occiir in siiperconc~iictors, ths attractive
interaction between two electrons by meam of phonon exchange ctooiiliates t lie
iisital repiilsive Coulomb interaction. Cooper was able to show that if these is
a uct attraction, hotvcver we&, betnreen a pair of electrons ahove the Fenui
surface, these electrons can form a stable superconclucting state.
2.1 Reduced
Let iis recall certain
Hamilt onian
relevant aspects of the BCS theory. BCS begin their cou-
siclerations wit h the effective Hamiltonian for elec tron interaction in a me tal.
The Hamiltonian may be written as
where Hph is referred to as the interaction mediated by the phonons, norrndy
written in the form
where
To cornplete the Hamiltoninnn which clescribes the systern WC need to aclcl the
part which ciescribes the inclepenclent Block elec t rom:
The total H d t o n i a n then is
BCS remarkcl t hat Ec1.(2 -1) corresponds to an attractive interaction for
elec trons of sii8icient ly close energies. The important electronic s tates of in-
terest are t h e very close to the Fermi surface, such that
Hesf can then be written as
In order to describe the ground state of a superconductor, we consider the
case of zero total momentum. The only part of the interaction which clescribes
the scattrruig of the pnrtiçln fiom o w pair of statrs (k T.-k i). to iuiotlier
CVe let bl = C & C : ~ , ancl bk = C-kiC-kr, wLi& are the creation aucl
annihiiation operator for electrons in Block statrs.
Thtis, we can m i t e the Hamiltoni;m as
BCS ccde<l this the reclticed Hamiltoniiui. Vkkl is composecl of two ternis:
the Brst clescribing the at trative electron -electron interaction mecliatecl by
phonons d the second restdting from screenecl Coulomb repulsion. BCS.
however, solvecl the mode1 with the strong simplifying assumption that VkJi
is isotropie ancl can be replaced by a constant attractive interaction V within
a characteristic energy tw of Fermi surface such that
so that V,&t is attractive in a shelI of wickh 2fwD centered at the Fermi
2.2 Cooper Pairs
It was Cooper who considerecl what woulcl happen if, to a system of electrons
filling the Fermi Sea, we add two more. He supposed that the electrons within
solw similar to t hc proldeiii of two p.articles hteract ing iu &ce space. the iiiaiii
tliffermre heing that becstise of the exclusion principk they c m uot bc foitiid
in the cl~iasi-particl states alreacly occupiecl. Siil> ject to t hese Limitations. t ke
most geueral state iu which these particles can he foimcl is a Iinear siiper-
position of pairs of qtiasi-particle states. Now. as the Hamiltonian conserves
mornen t~u and spin. ive can choose the wave fimction to be an eigenstate of
moment uni anci spin. The lowest state we expect the niorneutun to be is zero.
Hence, if we suppose k t that the two electrons are in the singlet state, then
we cxpect the groiuicl state of the particles to be
where the state 1 F > represents the Fermi sea ml the coefficient 1 crk 1 are
numbers yet to be cletermined. The expectation value of the energy in the
state 1 O > is
For E to be a minimum when a(k')' varies, subject to the restriction
the frinction
Heuce the energy A is cleterniinecl b r u the equation
The eqiiation has one solution with negative X if V is positive ad hence. the
interaction attractive. To fincl the solution with negative A. we c m replace
the srim by an integral ecpation.
We have assumed the density of state is slowly varying in the interval
O < ~k < hwD and have approximated it by N(O), the clensity of single-electron
states of one spin orientation, evaluated at the Fermi surface. Findy, we can
From Eq.(2.5), one has for weak coupling N(O)V << 1
Thus. au allowetl twerg- state esists with E < 0. Whrn thr iutrractiou
\- is applitul to a gas of fret* electrous. the Fermi Sca of drctmu is iiustai~h~
iiud the clectrons Iicar the Fermi Sca tcud to 11hd iu Cooper pairs. Severai
rcniark c m be macle.
(1). If there is a net attraction, Iiowever WC<&, betweeu a pair of electroris
jiist above the Fermi stuface, these electrons c m fom a boiuid state.
(2). Since the euerg?- E is rueastircd bom the Ferrui sidace. the energ-
of the two electrons at the F e d sidace is zero- E 5 O represeritiug t lie bounct
state has a lower energy th.m a pair of kee electrons? and the state is this
iinstable against siich elect ron pair formation.
(3). 1 E 1 is the bincliug euergy of a Cooper pair, and hence 2 h w ~ exp [- &]
is recloirecl to break up a Cooper pair, a fact which suggests that there shoiilcl
be a gap in the energy spectnun. Becaiw of the particular form of E, it can
not be expancled in s power series in V when V tends towards zero. This
explains why a microscopic theory of superconductivity could not be obtainecl
by convent ional perturbation t heory-
(4). The size of Cooper Pair: The concept of the coherence length was
introdiiced by Pippard in order to accotmt for the feature of the London equa-
tion for superconcluctivity. The correlation distance of the superconducting
electrons Q is related to the range of momentum 6p by c06p - h
In the condensation process the electrons involved are t hose wit hin a dis-
tnrice kBTo of the Fcmui surface. i-e.,
This coherenre Co czui aiso be regardecl as the average size of a Cooper
pair aucl we can say with great sirnplincatiou tliat in a pure stipercoodiictor
a Cooper pair Lias an average size of 100 nm to 1000 nm. This size is Ia rg~
comparecl wit h the mean dis tance between two concltiction electrons whicli
smoirnts to a few tenths of 1 nm. The Cooper pairs thiis overlap very greatly.
In the regions of one pair there are 106 to 10' other electrons which are them-
selves correlatecl into pairs. One tvoiilcl inttutively expect that the ensemble of
a groiip of such particles that penetrate so much into each other wodcl poses
interest ing propert ies.
2.3 Superconducting Ground State
In the BCS formulation of the theory of superconductivity, the ground state
is constmcted by zero-momentum singlet electron pairs (k i,-k 1). We denote
the probability amplitude for unoccupation of a pair as u k and by vk the
occupation of a pair. The wave huiction is then
The recLticecl Hclmiltonian of the groiincl statc of many Cooper pairs in t h
BCS moclel is
'H = C 2 ~ ~ b : b k + C Vkktbcbk- (2.7) k kk'
In orcler to cleterniine the eigen-energies of the Hamiltonian. one c m iise
the either Schrieffer's variational niethocl [29] One mininiiaes the expectatiou
value and fincls
which resitlts in
In t his equation, the " energy gap" parameter 1 A k ( satisfies the self-consistent
eqiiat ion
where p is the chernical potential. This result suggest that Er. is always
nonvanishing and reaches a mininurn Ek = A for electrons placed on the Fermi
surface, when ~k = p. Therefore the meaning of the gap can be understood: It
is the gap for single electron excitations fiom the superconducting (conclensed)
statt- to a fiw elcrt ron state. The tliemally excitecl elect rous .î<so.oss the gap < [ O
tauce. The same Liok tnre ewn for the stiperconclticting - tem for whicli t lie
gap mmïshes in some direction of k space.
Now. we brie@ summarkze the residts that may be obtainecl with this
(1). Gap energy
From the previotis restilts, we h o w the Hruniltonian of the groimcl state
of many Cooper Pairs in the BCS nioclel is Eq.(S.T) If V, ,t is approximated
by a negative constant, then
By assuming a constant clensity of state with an energy hw around the Fermi
energy, the summation in Eq.(2.11) can be replaced by an integral:
where N(0) is the clensity of electron states for one spin direction at the Fer-
mi surface. One notes a striking similai@ between Eq.(2.6) and Eq.(2.13).
In everything that folIows we are only interestecl in the we& coupling Lirnit
lV(0)V «: 1.
For uiost stipcrcouciiictom. X ( 0 ) V is of tLr orclcr 0.2 - 0.G iiucl - (2 ) . Condensed state energy
On(-e 1. is Irnown- one c m csplicitly calcidate t lie b e t i c aucl potential
ruergies. In the weak coupliug b d t , one bnds the energy of the ground state
Finaily, we can get
Obviously the conclensetl state energy is Iower than that of the normal state
system in which the electrons are indepenclent. Thus the energy gain is, how-
ever, very small, of the order A'/E~ per particle. Therefore the transition
from the normal states to superconducting state will certainly occur.
2.4 Calculation at Finite Temperature
(1). The critical temperature Tc
The transition temperature is simply defined as the temperature for which
A vanishes, so E at Tc is just the normal state energy E. Thus, upon integrating
S ~ C P kBTc < hD. which corresponds to a wnib: electron-phouou-clectrou
coupling defiriecl by X ( O ) V < 1. the integrai coverges rapicuy, a n c l we cari
replace the opper Litnit by in£in.ity. The intergal is a number wliich can be
wdiiatecl in ternis of Etiler's constmt 7, as - ln(2ylrr). Thus we have tkr
fiuiiotis BC'S criticd temperat ure relation,
Sirice the most important attractive p u t of the interaction Vkkt is chte to
phonous of high frecpency, we expect hw to be on the order of k 0 ~ . ln actual
pract ice bw is assrunecl to be approximately akûD, anci so one often sees t hat
the crit ical temperature equation as
where OD is the Debye temperature.
Since N ( 0 ) V is typically 0.2, the order of magnitude of the transition tem-
perature for many superconduc tors is correc tly predicted and an explmat ion
is providecl for why Tc is much Iess the Debye temperature.
These results suggest that the critical temperature of a superconductor
depends on three factors: the Debye kequency of the lattice vibration, B D ,
the cleusity of statcs of thr clcctrons at the Fermi sirrfarr X(0). sucl tlir iu-
terartiou coustant Iietween the electrou wid plionou. V. -4 niiiterid ml1 show
siipercouciiic ting heliaçior only if t lie uet interaction I~etweeu the elec-t rons
rcsiiltuig honi the coml~ination of the plionon-incliieetl and Coidonil> interac-
tiou is attractive. TLis is why normal good concliictors like silver and copper.
wliich have a n-enb: elect ron-phone interaction, do uo t exhibi t superconclirc-
tivity at the lowest temperatiire achievecl to date. However some materids
that are poor condiictors nt normal temperatiues, but which have a strong
eiec t ron-phouon interaction, are superconductors at some finite temperat iire.
Intleecl, the poorer the çondiictivity at nomal temperat lues the Ligher t lie
crit icd temperature nt low temperature. This siipports the viewpoint that
the electron-phonon interaction that causes resistivity at normal temperatures
gives rise to siiperconductivity at low temperatitres.
(2). Variation of the gap with temperature
The self-consistency condition is foiuicl
From Eq(2.16) the dependence of the energy gap on temperature can be com-
pu tecl near T 4 Tc; t his equation can be reduced to
For s m d T, h(T) is very nearly constant. Also we see that A(0) is h i te and
non-zero, and that as T + Tc, A + O with iDfinite slope and A* vanishes with
finite slope, so that the ratio A(T)/A(O) will serve as an order parameter <.
The form A(T)/A(O) is given Fig 2.6 A decreases as T increases, and finally
vanishes at a certain temperature Tc.
Bq' coui~wring Eqs.(2.13) and (2.15) WC h d tliat the iDutbrgy gap giws. for
al1 siipcrçouditc-tocs whcu iV(0)F << 1.
n-here ko is Boitzman's coustant. Ec1.(2.17) preclicts t h the critical temper-
atiire is simply rclatecl to the energy gap at T = 0.
(3) .Calcdation of t hermodynamic functions
(A). Specific heat anci Entropy.
The BCS theory leacis to an expression for the free energy from mbch
t lie transition temperature and the thermoclynamic properties can be clerived.
This energy (in zero magnetic field) is
w here
2 112 Ek = (EZ + Lik)
and
From this equation and the relation
we obtain the entropy (per unit volume)
This esxmsion For the entropy is of esactIy the sanie forrn as the entropy of
n #as of iuclepenclent fermions.
Since the gap parameter tends to zero as T -t Tc, the entropy is contin-
iioiis at the critical temperature. There is, therefore, no latent heat involvd
at the trruisitiori. ancl this result agrees with ex~eriment. One also can sec
from Eq-(2.18) t hat as the temperattire approaches absolrite zero. the entropy
A hecomes exponentially soiall, being proportional to exp( - E).
The specific heat per mit voliune of the electrons c m be calculatecl fiom
In the weak-coupling limit N(0)V < 1 1Mmhlschlegel[30] lias solvecl Ec&L19)
numerically ancl has tabulated values of C,/C, as a function of S. The simple
BCS mode1 predicts that in the zero magnetic field the specific heat is not
continuous there, and one has
At lower temperat tues the specific heat decreases rapidly, and because of the
gap in the spectnun of excitation it becornes proportional to exp[-A(O)/kT]
at temperatures below about Tc/lO-
(B) . Critical Magnetic Fielcl
One CHU then show that. necar nl~solu te zero.
where Hc is the tliemodynamic critical field.
For an appliecl field H 5 He, supercondiictivity is clestroyecl becaiise the
spin singlet boiuicl state is clestroyed by thermal Biictiiations. The pair bincling
eoergy is then effectively overcome by the magnetic energy, so that the pairs
break up into single electrons. This type of behavior chnracterizes type I
si~perconcliictors.
Chapter 3
Proximity Effect
Wihen a normal metd N is clepositecl on top of a si~perconclt~ctor S ancl if
t lie electricd contact between the two is good, the two rnetals infltience each
other. The properties of the electrons on both sicles of the boimlary are then
moclifieci; cg., in the superconclucting sicle the energy gap is recliicecl, ancl in
extreme cases the system may even lose its superconducting properties. On
the other side of the boundary, Cooper pairs can exist in the normal metd
side which may have superconclucting behavior incluced in it. This is the so
called proximity effeet for superimposed thin metal films.
Thece are &O a nurnber of works that have been done using clifferent
approaches to investigate theoreticdy the properties of the proximity effect
in superconducting a thin film, such as the Ginzburg-Landau (GL) theory, the
rnicroscopic approach based on Green's functions, and the McMillan Tunneling
Model.
1 Theoretical Background
1.1 'Leakage' of Cooper Pairs
The 'proximity effect' is relatecl CO the " le&geTv of Cooper pairs fioui a sii-
perconchictor S to a normal nietal N. S is the procliicing 'reservoir' aad N is
the 'receiving' one. As the thiclsess Ii-L of the lealizge region on the N sick
is typicdly 10"A - 10%A, the 'proximity effect' is of a relatively long extent.
Wë k t consicler a simple case, where (a), we neglect dl electron-eiectron
interaction in N; m c t (b), there is no magnetic field.
(1). If the metal N is 'clean', i.e tN > eiv , where IN is mean
frce path in N and b is the coherence length, then the probability amplitude
F =< 9, q31 > for finding a Cooper pair at distance 1 x 1 fiom the N-S borindary
has the asymptotic form
where 4(x) is a slowly varying function of x ancl
where UN. is the electron velocity in N and T is temperature. However, when
T + 0, the decrease of F is not exponential any more, but becomes slowly
I F - - ( 1-21
x + x1-
(2). If N is 'dirty' (Lv < & ) , the leaicage of t h pairs is cont rollcd by a
clifhision process [6]. It is then convenient to introcliice the cliffi~ion coefficient
1 D = (for one electron at the Fermi levcl in the normal statc). Then the
asymptotic from Eq.( 1.1) still holcls, but now
1.2 Cooper Limit
The first ancl simplest case is clisciissecl by Cooper of t hin N ancl S films in
1961. He pointecl out a physical argument which can be presentecl as follows.
In the BCS theory the range between the attractive electrons is very short,
biit the size of the wave packet or the correlation clistance of the attractively
boimcl Cooper pairs is of the order of the coherence length. Due to this longer
coherence length, the Cooper pairs can extend a considerable distance into
a region in which the interaction between electrons is not attractive. As a
result , the g r o d state energy of this thin bimetallic layer is chamcterized by
some average of the interaction parameter N(0)V over both metals, which in
tuni cletermines the energy gap of the layer and its transition temperature.
4 n electron spends part of its time in N and part in S. Due to the different
clensities of states in N ancl S (NN, SS ) the normalizecl times spent can be
whrrc the l i d t <IL\*, il3 << < is callecl tlic Cooper E t . The critical tcnipt8ra-
tiirc is giveu by the ustial BCS expression [4].
Experimentidiy it is cLifficidt to obtain a very thin film of weI1 clefincd thick-
ness. This linLit is. however. very important for funclamenta1 stiiclies of the
iuteraçtion constants. .Go, as pointecl out by Bassewitz and Minnigerode.
some films (CIL) deposited at low temperature have properties very ciiffereut
from the biilk,
1.3 Magnetic Aspects of the Proximity Effect
Experimental results of the contact between two layers show that the critical
properties of the superconducting thin f ih are different from the bulk super-
conductor: the critical thickness, which is aiways s m d e r than the coherence
length of the bulk superconductor, decreases with a decrease of the effective
mean fkee path. The deposited films have a very short electron mean free path
in the normal state and their coherence length is modifiecl.
A magnetic metal in contact with a superconductor metal breaks Cooper
pairs and hence suppresses superconduc t ivi ty, which is the magnetic aspect of
the prosimity effwt. If the n o m d nietal is uingurtic-. it shoiilrl have niow pro-
uoiiuc-td effects che to the ackiitioual hterac-tion of spius nith tlic coucli~rtiou
i*lwtroas. Filieu N is a ferronitigriet ( i.e. Fe) or au .uitZerrouiaguet ( hlu. Cr).
es+e"icnts [31. 34 show that the orcler paranieter A essentidy muishes at
the N-S iuterface-
(a). For the ferromagnetic case. this is what is expectecl [33], since the
two nienibers of a Cooper pair (with opposite spins) see very differerit exchange
potential (wlierc ï - O&), the thickness of penetration is of orcler heuFr.
ancl is very srnail-
(b). For the antiferromagnetic case, the penetration is probably coo-
trokcl by c~efects in the magnetic structure (non compensatecl spin) which act
very much iike isola ted magnet ic impiui t ies.
1.4 Magnetic Field Behavior
We now consider the situation where a magnetic field is applied pardel to the
S-N interface, where many interest ing effects appear.
(1). Under certain conditions, N displays a Meissner effect in low mag-
netic field. In incrensing fields, the superconducting properties incluced in N
by the proXimi@ of S (in particular, the Meissner effect) are progressively
clestroyecl. In pract ice, t his destruction occurs in fields significantly smaller
than the critical fields. It turns out that experimental investigation of this
<lestniction leads to valuable information on the 'superconducting properties'
of 3,
(2). Upper mitiral field HL ùi the Cooper Luit.
The critical field of S (ancl, in partictdar. the ttpper critical fielcl). rila)-
I>e strongly nioclifiecl by the prosimity of PI. ;Uso. the beliavior of S near its
cl-it ical fiekcl is niocMecl by t Le proximity effect.
2 D e Gennes-Werthamer Solution for Dirty
Mat erials
It is weil kiown t hat the behavior of sitpercoac~ttctors in a magnet ic field in
t lie neighborhoocl of the criticd temperature is quditat ively well describecl
by Ginzbitrg and Lünclau's phenomenological theory, which Gov'kov [5] hm
shown can be clerivecl by exploithg the fact that the gap or orcler parmeter
approaches zero. There has been much theoretical work on proximity-effect
sanclwiches in the G-L regime, in particiilar the calculation of the critical
temperature by de Germes. In this section, we wiU summarize the result of de
Gennes-Werthamer Mode1 of " proximity effect" .
For sirnplicity the present account will be restncted to the case of a two-
Layered system in zero field. We assume that the transition temperature Scws
of our N-S layer corresponds to a second-order phase change, as is incleecl
obsenred in most cases. The layers are assumecl to be thin in cornparison with
the coherence length ci, cz. Then, for T = TcwsT the Cooper pair amplit iicles
( 1 ) = ( ( r ) >. nliirli is the probabilitj- aniplitiiclt~ of fincliug twc~
~~lcctroris iu the rouclenstcl state at point r. are snid eve~whcrc. h ei~~Li
iuetal we m.&e au approshatiou of the %CS type. TLic cic.c-trous iuterzirtious
arc clescril~ed by a couphg constant k*( I - ) . wliere
The interaction is citt off at a fieqiiency d D ( . c ) = dos. is positive aud
attractive. Zn the N regions, qv may be of either sign, clepencling on a clelicate
balance between the Coiilomb repdsion anc l phonon-inclricecl attraction. In
the siihcritical regirne (T 5 Tc) A(r) is smaU and can be obtairiecl from au
expansion of the self consistent eqiiat ion
where
and the range of the kernel in S and N is given by
From the self-consistency equation, one can derive the discontinuities in vdue
and slope of A(o) at the bounclary and obtain the following conditions by the
pair potentid.
The conctitiou E c l . ( U ) is rather general. but the conclition Eq.(2.'i) is rliarac-
\.Ve now present some remarks macle in the introcitiction concerning the
SC& of these proxiruity effects.
(1). FVe consicler k t the case Kv = O, where &(S) vanishes in N but
the concIensation F ( r ) = h/V has a finite tail in N due to the contributions
of the pair amplitucle in S. Iieeping only the lwgest range solution
one obtains
Flv (x) = F1v (O) ezp( -Kx) , 12.9)
with the Ieakage length = EN. The approximation does not apply well to
thin films where al1 contributions to the kernel have to be considered-
(2). If we consider another situation where there is a nonegligible at-
tractive interaction VN between electron in N: i.e, N is itself a superconductor,
with a low transition temperature TcN , then IC1 diverges for T -, Tclvs- This
divergence is a 'critical opalescence' property typical of second-order transi-
tions. When T > %, it c m be shown that the asymptotic form of F in N is
again exponential. Of course, for T < TcN, F tends to a nonzero limit in N.
(3) Let 11s rousiclw t tLr simple Y-S sanclwivh la>-t-rd stnirtiirc mith ap-
pn)p~iate boiuiclary c-ouclitions iu the Cooper b i t . Da. Ds < <. Our mu fiiitl
for tks sitiiation
rvhere T, = T,(r) is the biillr transition temperature <lefinecl by
Note the cornparison with Cooper's formula
(4). Anotlicr intcresting geometry for the proxïmity effect in the S-N-
S sanclwich. cle Gennes showecl that in this system a stipercrirrent c m travel
t hrotighout the normal Iayer. The theory is quite similar to that of the .Joseph-
son ciment, but it is foiincl t hat the maximrun supercurrent is proportional to
(Tc - T)'. This is in contrast to the (Tc - T) factor in the Josephson ci~rrent.
Due to the fact that the theory agrees with many experimental results,
t his met hod is evtensively usecl to investigate properties of the proxïrnity effect .
3 McMillan Tunneling Mode1
Ln the foLlowing we shall concentrate on another simple theoretical mode1 of
the proximity effec t between superimposed normal and superconducting met al
films. This is the McMillan Tunneling bfode1[21], which has an attractive
Figure 3.1: T~uuieling niocle1 with a normal metal ancl a siiperconcluctor sepa-
ratecl by a a potentid barrier ancl with the BCS potential (clash lines constant
in each metal)
simplicity that ailows a complete solution and has the advantage that it is uot
restricted to the vicinity of the cntical point. In this model, a potential barrier
is assumecl to exist between the nIms (Fig 3.1) and the tunneling through the
barrier is treated by means of the t r a d e r Hamiltooian method.
The tunneling Hamil tonian can wri t ten as
where T,,r is tunneiing mat& element, which we take equal in magnitude
between every state 4s in S and every state 4; in N.
The Hamiltonian for the sanclwich is the sum of the Hmniltonians for the
Treatirig the elect ron-phonou interaction aud the tiuuiclhg H i d t 0 n . h to
second-orcler. the self-consistent ecluation for the BCS potential is
15h = R R ~ [ A , ( E ) / ( E ~ - I + ( E ) ) ~ ~ ] ~ E . (3.16)
(1). For a giveu poteotial A$ and il;', by computing the excitations, one
cm gct some generd features as follows.
(a). \men the pairing interaction vwiishes in N, the energy gap is jiist
which means there exists an energy gap in the excitation spectnim eqiial to
1 . Since the relaxation time r L ~ for tunneling from N to S is the s m e
for each state & in in, where rLv is the average tirne an electron spencis in
N before penetrating the barrier and escaping into superconcluctor layer, the
same energy gap is observed in tunnehg into the S or N side of the sandwich.
(b). The electronic density of states is
for both superconducting and normal metals. We know this electric density of
states is measured clirectly by placing a tiinneling junction on one or the O t her
side of t h SN sa~clmcli nucl uieasiuiug the u o ~ ~ a ~ c d first <lt*ii~i~ti\*c~ of thr
t ituneiiug c-iment \*ersits voltage by t iuinehg t h o -
For the tiuinelirig mode1 WC have assiunecl that the path Lcugth or rc-
laxatiou time is the same for each state anci there e'iists a sharp gap in t h .
excitation spectnuii. It ki clear that the electronic density of states qualita-
tively is in accord wit h the experimental clensity of states, which is somewherc
between t hese limits-
(2). We consicler the self-consistency of the BCS potential with a finite
pairing interaction in N. One fincls ûn enhancecl contribution to the measttrecl
energy gap, which may provicIe an e-xperimental probe of the pairing interac-
tion-
If one considers A" for a thick normal metai ancl talies Tzr = O, Froni
Ec1.(3.16). one can get the self-consistency equation for the BCS potentid in
Sas
where the BCS potential for the bulk superconcluctor is
A h i t e pairing interaction Xx is assumed in the normal metal. The presence
of the superconductor induces pairing in the normal metal and ïncreases A$'
from its buk value. The energy gap is approximately
For the SN sariclwîch, T b shows au eali;mcecl conti-ibittiou to the rucasi~rtd
cnergy gap. which provicles au estimate of the piairing interaction.
(3). Asstmiug that each metal is stdîiciently thin, ancl the ratio of the
me~m Free pat h to the film t hickness remains constant =mcl c 1, one can gct the
transition temperattwe of the SN sanclwich as a fimction of the parameters.
Since the theocy is linear at the transition temperature, if we consider
A N = 0. one gets the self-consistency ecpation for ~f~ at Tc as
The transition temperatrire can be determinecl by
where C> is the digamma function and T, denotes the transition temperat lire
of the bulk superconductor, which satisfies
There are two Limits, the Anderson limit and Cooper
est.
lirnit , which are of inter-
(a). Making use of the asymptotic for +(t) - h(z ) for large z in the
Anderson limit of large r, one h d s
svliicti differs somewhat the solution given in (a).
in the correct treatment of tlie probleni the two sicles are tightly couplecl
o d y for energies < r rztther tban for dl energies iip to the ciit off Frecliienm
as Cooper's treatment ~Lssiimes.
Chapter 4
Single Superconduct ing Film
There h.as been mitch theoretical work on the proximity-effect iising the de
Gennes-Wert hamer Moclel anc l the McMillan Moclel. In this Chapter a met hoc1
basecl on the Bogolitibov equations, with a somewhat cwerent line of approach
regarchg the self-consistertcy of the pair amplitucle, will be disciissed. Wë have
moclifiecl this approach by using a self-consistency condition less s t ringent t han
the exact one which demands that the assumed and calculated pair amplitude
exactly coincide. This approach gives the solution of the temperature and
tliickness dependence of the gap, which is obtained by solWig the gap equation
fkom the self-consistency condit ion imposed on the pair amplitude. CVe start
with the simplest system, which is a superconducting thin film of uniform
thickness surrounded by a normal metal and also, but later this approach will
be used to analyze a superlattice composed of alternathg Iayers of normal and
siipercondiicting met&.
To IIP sprifir. N-e iuaktl the follorviog asstiuiptious nlmrit the sj-strui wc
iutcucl to clesc-rihc:
(1). We stiicly cleiu sitpeirolicliicting cmcl clean iiomal nietds. By rleau
we h p l y I » HT). whc-re 1 is the ue.m free patk ancl c(T) is tempcratiire
dependent coherence iengt h.
(2) A mode1 with interactions is treatecl in the mean-field nppro2Einia t ion,
mcl we assime the phonon-inclucecl BCS interactions me given by
Ir Siiperconc~t~ct ing p- =
(3). W e start by assiiming the pair amplitiicle is constant within the
superconclucting region, thris enabling iis to constnict e'cplicit solutions to t lie
Bogoliiibov ecpations. For the self-consistency condition we recpire that the
spatial average of the assumecl ancl the calculatecl orcler parameter be ecltia.1.
This conclition follows by rninimizing the free energy with respect to the gap
parameter-
(4). In orcler to simpilify the algebra for the gap equation, we assume that
the Fermi velocity, the Debye temperature, etc. are the same for both metals
and we assume the transmission a d reflection coefficients at the interface t O
be imity.
1 The Energy Eigenstates
aiid the normal metais f i h g the remnintlcr of space 1 1 I> CL (geonietii~s
which v<a.ry iu ouc clirection the x dimension). This is illustratecl in Fig. 4.1.
Figure 4.1 : Single sitperconcluctor layer
LVe clenote the operator of supercondiictor by 1 ancl that of the normal
metal by 2. The Hamiltonian for the system will, in general, be of the f o m
with Hi, i = 1,2, given by
where #=(r) is the second quantized electron field operator and
Tlir c-ocfficients 1.; arp the phone-iucliicecl BCS intcractiou. Trwtiug th(- iii-
terwt iou tcms sppearhg ( 1.2) iu the uiezlu-field npprosiuiatiou rccliiccs t lit*
Haiiiiltoninn to t lie following espression:
where F(x) is the real pair amplitricle, whicli is
F ( r ) c m be obtained by using the cpasiparticle creatîon operators c&' and b t
whick operate on the groiuicl state 1 O). h tems of the Namhti doublet
we therefore ob tain fi-om ( 1.3) the Bogoliubov ecpations in the superconcluct-
ing region and normal metal region
[i; - q(-iV)r3 + VF(x)r11q5(i, t ) = 0, 1 x I< a
[à$ - ~ ( - i ~ ) r & ( r , t ) = O, I 4 > a
.ri are the Pauli matrices and q5(r, t ) = ediHiq5(r)eiHt.
The system can now be quantized by, in addition to imposing the equal-
time anticommut ator
spwif-iug appropria tr boiuidq couclitious for the soltition of ( 16). Thsr
coudit ious arisr dite to continiiit- of t lie crvrent acros t lie Uiterfarw. aiid tutD
Wé iucitrcle the effect of transnùssion ancl refiection coefficients at the
interface with rf = rn2/rnl, where 5 -r O+. Then. one reaclïly solves theni
siibject to the boim<lq conditions by writing the field operator m(r. t ) as a
siini of positive and negative fiequency terms.
where E > 0 , I = (ky, k,) ancl p = (y, r) . The index i = 1, ..., 4 represents the
four linearly independent solutions which will be obtained from Eq (1.6). The
wave hinc t ions di) and v ( '1 sat isfy
for 1 .r I> a. The nomnlization conctitiou iuc
J ' ~ x $ ~ ) ( E , [ , .r)dj)(E, ~ , s ) = 2dq6(E - Er)
JFm &z$~'(E~ . r ) ~ ( ' ) ( E. lT X) = 2xaij6(E - Er)
Jzm d d ( E, 1, x)dj) (& l . 2:) = O
wliile t lie .mt icommiitation relation imphes
with al1 ot her anticommutators vanisbg. Now. the bocmclary concIitious
for the wave fiuctions are
To find the solution, we introduce the approximation that the pair-amplitiide
in the domain of the thin film is homogeneous:
Figure 4.2: The assumed form of the pair amplitude
For convenience, let 7 = t = 1 and assume that both the superconducting
and normal metals have the same parameters m and kF. We can then write
the Bogoliubov Equation (1.10) as
Lrt i r s c ~ c h c
u(E.1.x) = \ ( ~ . l . . r ) e ' ~ ~ .
If \( E, 1, r) is smooth on the atomic scale, WC can chop the second <lerivative
te~m in the above ecption, which resiilts in
with A(x) given in (1.15). .b(E, L, :c) has to fiilfill the nonnalization conclition
( 1.11 ) and the following boimclaxy conditions:
Here we have introcliiced the following notations:
4
' k* = q*k
p * = ( 1 1 + p
q = (kt - 1 y
k = mE/q
P = mEylG?
6 = -AIE
. r = 8 ( E - A)(1 - 69'/* + @(6 - E ) i ( b - 1)'l2
T h soltttiour; arr of the
for
Note thst . given the solution t r i ( E, 1, s). we can inuuecliately mite down the
solution ri(& 1, ) hy iising
2 The Pair Amplitude and the Self-Consistent
Gap Equation
In the last section, we obtained the eigenhctions which can be used to com-
pute the pair amplitude F ( x ) as a function of the order parameter. The order
parameter is t hen de t ermined by the self-consis t ent gap equat ion:
Tlic siil>script *W" refers to the 1-2 component of the matLu formecl from the
oiiter pro<luc-t of m(r) with &r) which is tlefined in (1.5). Since m-e niiI work
at finite temperatiue. the .mgtda.r bracket in F(x) denote a themai average
and the operator a' ancl bi satisfies
represents the thermal ~Listnibiition fimction (0 = 5). With this, oor pair
aniplitiide wïll be
,C3E ( i l ) d i ( i l x ) x t h - ) (2.22) 2
Ln principle, the pair amplitude shotdd be computed from the ecpation
above by using the exact eigenfunctions, but this calcuiation is quite ciifficult
and will not be attempted here. One limiting case in which the expressions
sirnpliS. is obtainecl if we set
For this approiuuiatiou. WC helievr tktit the r ~ s i i l t s sliotiicl giw thr uiost
gïvcs for the pair .uiiplititcle F(x). for 1 .r I< a.
Froni the self-consistency gap requiremcut (2.21). we finally get the g,~p
ecluat ion of
n-here M = mkF/2$ is the clensity of states at the Fermi surface of the normal
met al for one spin projection-
3 Thinkness Dependence of the Critical Tem-
perature
Although we have obtained a relatively simple gap equation, except for certain
Iimiting cases it is not possible to obtain analytical results and recourse must
be macle to m e r i c d solutions. In this section, we first consider the case close
to the critical temperature of the film, a d then away fiom the critical point
to examine the temperature and thickness dependence of the gap parameter.
3.1 A Calculation Close to the Critical Temperature
Iu t l i is sert ion. wc wiïiU k t mlcrilatc t ke cIcpencleur.c of the triuisitioii truiper-
:rtiire T , ( r r ) on the tliickncss of the filni. Uncler the limitntiou A -r O . the gap
eqtrntiou bcconies
wkere k = r~rE/q. If we define the fiinctioo
and assiirne that TJa) *: u d , integrating (3.26) by parts residts in
-9 13w 1 = V?v(o) { I (ud ) - - " /a &I(u) cmh -(-)}.
2 O 2
The first term in Ecpiation (3.28) represents the zero temperature contn hiit ion
to the gap fiinction, ancl the second term contains the thermal corrections. The
hinction I (w) may be cdculated as
where
and I ( x ) is given by
1 su iz I ( x ) = Te + lnx + -[- - cosz - ZCi(t) - xSi (2 ) ) .
2 :c
Ci(.!-) amcl Si(.r-) arc t h Cosine and Sim intcgrals[35] nliic-Ii arp clrtiric~tl as
foHows:
and 7, is Eder's constaut- In the limi t 11- - m ancl .c -, 0, mie can 01, tain the
following approiuimat ions:
We next clefine the critical thickness a, as the tbickness below whicli it is
not possible to keep the siiperconchcting state at the any temperature:
This can be determinecl fiom the gap function by setting T = 0, for which
I ( x ) = I(&nd), with ud the Debye frequency. AssAssuming that &Gd » 1, and
using (3.31), in the limit T = O we obtah
where TF = EF/kB clenotes the Fermi temperature and Tc is the bu& super-
conductor transition temperature. This result can be wrîtten in terms of thc
whtre 6 = P ~ / R & ancl A. is the hi& zero temperatrire gap.
In orcler to consider the finite temperatiue case, we rettini to (3.26). The
thichess dependence of the critical temperatiire cm be obtiihecl by using the
cl , given in (3.33):
where Tc@) A Tc@) 2
7, = :i- = --- TF A, Tc T'
From the t hickness dependence of the self-consistent gap iuicler t his b i t at ion,
we can analme the resiilt as T -r O and the asymptoticformof T,(n) as a + W.
(1). In the case T , < 1, we use (3.30) to h c l
T (a) 1 ccc CL l*'- -- w-1- -ae Tc in2 n ccc
Expanding the above equation arotmd a/a, = 1 to first order, we find
(2). In the case Tc » 1, we have
Expanding around T,/T,(a) = 1 to first order results in
3.2 Numerical Result
Let us iiow- irivestigatc t Lc thirhessc .mcl tcniperat tire clepenclcucc of t lir gap
rcpa t ion paraniet er in generd, for which niunericd
Thc p p fiinetion of Eq. (3.26) can he rewritten as
mcthods mitst hc rised.
Assilaiiug Td » CL), we extend the iïmit on the E integrni in the seconcl
tenu of this ecpatioo to W. ancl find the resulting ecpuvalent eqiiations:
In Fig.4.3 We
of the criticd
present the numerical solut ion to (3.42) giving the dependence
temperature over the entire range of thickness. One can also
veriQ in t his figure the asymptotic b i t s of (3.37) aod (3.39). The numerical
ecpivalence of handing the cutoff dependence in this manner wil1 be useful to
evaluate the gap equation with a finite order parameter A.
Figure 4.3: The dependence of the critical temperature on film thichess.
4 The Thickness Dependence of the Gap Pa-
Iri the Iast section. we consiclerecl the gap p;irameter to he zero. Ch+ non-
consicler the case of a h i t e gap. First of d. WC consicler T = O in the genecal
gap equation, ancl hd
where p is clehed iu Eq.(1.19). Some manipidation of (4.43) resiilts in the
foiiowing ecliiation for Ao( a) :
where
anci the fimction d ( b ) is given by
dx s g x J L ( b ) = 4- dr /DD - sin 2x
b~ x2 i2 + sin2 x - -1, 2 2
CVe now corne to the final calcidation in this chapter, that being the thick-
ness and temperature depenclence of the gap, which we define A(n). We start
with tlir fiiU gap tytration (2.25):
I sin 4pcl JE K1- 4pa
) tnnh( +). (4.47) \ --\-(O) I - p c o ~ 2 ( 2 p a ) 2
aud
sin" sin 2s 2 q ( b , ~ ) = [ d z l r z2 Za + rc 11 - -1 (-4.49)
22 l+eq[(z"f)+b2c]'
The nrinierical solution to (4.48) giving the clepenclence of the h i t e tempera-
ttire gap parameter on film thickness can be found in Ref. [2.l].
Chapter 5
Finite Superlattice System
We have presentecl a geneicrl methoci for the self-consistent solution of the
Bogoliubov ecliiations for a class of geometnes which incliicles the case of a
superconclucting thin film. Ln this chapter we stticly the proximity effect in a
finite stiperlat tice system. employing the s m e methods basecl on the Bogoli-
~ibov equations using a step function approximation for the pair amplitude,
the height of the amplitude being determinecl by a minimization of the free
energy of the system. We s h d in particular h d using this method the cnt-
ical temperature of this system as a function of the film thicknesses and the
niimber of layers.
1 The Solution of Bogoliubov Equation and
Gap Equation
The systeui to be iuvestigated consists of iclenticd st~percouclric tors of uviclt li
2a separatecl by I.?yers of normal metal of wicltli 26 at the :r = O plane. while
tlie end of the system is a nomal layer. We choose coordinates for each from
-[(2n+l)c~+2nbj to (2n+l)a+2nb. with n = 0 , l . 2 ,3 . . . , n - 1. If N represents
t Le uiimber of superconclucting layers, then N = (2n + 1). Figure 5.1 shows the
systern. nith S a o c l N representing the supercondiictor layers <mcl tlie nornid
met al layers. respec tively-
Figiue 5.1: Finite superlattice system
For simpiicity it is assumed that a l l physical properties such as the Fermi
velocity, the Debye temperature, etc., are the same for both metals, and the
transmission and reflection coefficients at the interfaces are unity.
For clean materials, the wave function p is
which can be nrritten as foiiows:
CVc note that the gaps for each supercontlucting layer are clifferent. ancl there-
fore we use the label j to intlicate the gap parameter for a particidar layer.
This assumption of the potential term for the system ~mcler consideration is
show in Fig. (5.2).
The origin of the system is at the center so that the system is symmetric
about the origin, a n c l because of parity, we only need to solve one side of
the system (x > O). The solutions can be labeled by their parity &, where
ri yI(x) = f p*(-x). Generally, the solutions can thus be split into 2 paxity
states, and the solutions for the superconducting regions and normal regions
f o r s > O can be written as
Figure 5.2: The Asstunetl fom of the pair amplitude
where d = n + 6 'ami the parameters b i 7 pi, are definecl w ~OUOWS:
l P = h i )
k = mE/q
a(j, = - @ / E
Y(j1 = (1 - b ( j ) 1 ''* Note that , given the soiution x > 0, the solution x < O can be calculated
rp*( -4 = f TLP* (4-
The coefficients in (1.2) are determined by applying the nomalization condi-
t ion
For the huit notrual hyer. ive h d
To simplify the solution, we consider k t order in 6. The wave funct ion
of the system then becomes
With these, and howing for the last normal layer Ncj ) = ~ n / 2 ~ , we c m ,
toget her wit h the boundary conditions, determine d the coefficients.
where "j" labels the layer of superconductor fiom the center of the film to
the right: j = 0,2, J,6 .. .. The total number of layers of the system then is
1V = 2 j + 1, and 1 = j + 2, j +4, .... N are those layen to the right of the jth
wlirre F ( x ) = - ( p + ( r ) y(.,)) p. the stiliscripts intlirating the matLu conipo-
Findly, we get the gap ecpations
sin 2k.a + - sin 2jkcl sin 2k( jd + a) 2kn sinL 2ka + 2
Ar cos 2jkd - sin 26k-rI], 2ka 1 4
where N ( 0 ) = mkF/2a2 is the density of states at the Fermi surface of the
normal metal for one spin projection and V is the coupling constant.
As a check, let j = O and N = 23' + 1 = 1, which is the single supercon-
ducting film. In this case Equation (1.11) reduces to:
1 = p $ taoh(PEl2) /' dp[(l - sin 4 ka
VN(0) O 4ka 11 9
which is the same as that obtained in the last chapter for the single layer.
2 Reduced Thickness Dependence of the Re-
duced Crit i d Temperature
Iu this section we use the self-consis tcnt gap ecliiation jiist clerivecL to cvülii21.t~
the rectiicecl thclmess C L / C L , at zero temperature, ancl then obtain au espression
for the clependence of the transition temperature T,(c) on the thicliness of the
film.
First let u s ciefine a fiinction I ( u ) as
sin 4kcc 4Ea 1
sin 2k-n + - sin 2jkd sin 2 4 jd + a ) . 2kn
so that after integrating (1.11) by parts the gap fimction can be rewritten as
The first term in (2.13) represents the zero temperature contribution to E-
q.(l.ll), while the second term contains the thermal corrections. We consider
T = O first. The function I (ud) is given by
where
where the f u t ion . J (c t ) is definect as foiiows:
sin cr - a cos cr cr .J(n) = [ - -S i (a) - Ci(cr)]
2Ck 3 -
a(l + jy) cosa(l + jg) - sinn(1 + j g ) + 4 1 +J :J ) [ e(l+ j y )
where « = 2AR, y = l+b/a,Ci(n) and Si(cr) are the Cosine and Sine integrals.
If we let xcosx - sinx
K ( X ) = + xSi(x) + 2Ci (x) , 5
Eq.(2.15) wiil be reduced as
We now want to see how the fwiction I ( x ) approaches the Iimit .g
1 1 lim I(n) = 7 + ln& - j y ) - - (1+ jy) h ( l +jy)} .
a-OO 2
which leads to t hc follonring rethiced crit ical t hichess at zero temperat iirc:
wliere < L / C L , is the retliicecl critical thicliuess (Le.. the thckuess below wliick
the si~perconclricting layers become normal at T = O ) . This critical tliicknes
<le. which is clefined for a single siiperconcluctor layei-. will be used as a lengtli
scde. so that the ratio b / a , the width of normal layer and the width of super-
coucluctor layer, can be written as bloc ancl a / c r , , respectivdy. It is also iiscftd
where Bo is the Debye temperature and Te is the bidk siiperconclucting tran-
sition temperature.
To determine the thickness dependence of the critical temperature above
which the superconductors becomes normal, we retuni to Equation (2.13). Of
course we have to consider the second term of Equation (2.13) for the h i t e
temperature case. h u m i n g that hod > 1 With 4 0, (2.13) together
with (2.14) gives
Aft er integration oE the secoud telm. the ecpation becomes
which. iising the e-xpression for T. T/Tc. can be e?cpressecI as follows:
where the fi~nction H(x) is clefined as:
Integrating t his ecption, we obtain TIT, as function of i, bla,, and a/nc as
Numerically evaluating this equation gives results for values of T/T, vs. a/a,
as b/a, and j Vary. Figs. 5.4 Jc 5.3 show typical curves of T/Tc for various
layers. For the h i t e superlattice case, we would expect that as bla, increases,
the results of T/Tc shoulcl be close to the single layer case; i.e., for a large
Figure 5.3: The dependence of the reduced transition temperature T/Tc on
the thickness a/ac . solid line represents single Iayer. Dash line represents
N = 100, Dash-dot line represents N = 40, Dash-dot-dotted line represents
N = 10 for b/a, = 0.05 Superlattice
Figure 5.4: The dependence of the reduced transition temperature T/Tc on
the thickness a/a,. Solid h e represents single layer. Dash line represents
bla, = 5, Dash-dot line represents b/a, = 0.5, Dash-dot-dotted line represents
bfa, = 0.05 For N=10 finite superlattice
3 The Behavior of the Energy Gaps
In t Lis section. we slid inwst igate the t h i c h e s cmcl temperat iirc clepencleucc
of t tic gap parameters, wliich we denote di), for cliffereut 1ayers. In pa-ticiilar.
wt. cousicler the t hicimess depencleuce O t the gap parme ter ratios A(~)/A(')
at zero temperatiue and then consider the case of the finite temperature and
cleterminr the t hiclmess clepenclence of the gap parameter
This is of interest since, in the restdts jiist clenvecl, for T/Tc l e s thnn aroitncL
0.3 the bchwior is im~ts~tal anci for TIT, greater t h u i aroitnci 0.3 the restilts
approach the hitlk limit for al1 bln , and j values. FVe coiilcl then examine how
the ratio
varies with temperature, which can be used to estimate the reliability of the
methods we have employed.
In principle, the gap parameter A(x) = V F ( x ) is spatidy dependent,
where F(x) = -(v,br(x)+l(x)) is the pair amplitude and @r (x) and $J~(X) are
the bounclecl pair electron wave functions. By the proximity effect, the ieaked
electron pairs may interact with other electron pairs which leak from other
superconduct ing regions, and t hus the electron-electron coupling in the central
regions of the system is expected to be stronger than in those regions away
aud to die off soiutwhvliat towarcls the eclges. as iiliistratccl in Fig(3.2).
lu order to see if the calctilations support tks espectatiou. WC start n-it h
t Le fidl gap ecpation (1.1 1). C V e now define the I ( w ) as follows:
sin 2kc + - sin 2jkd sin 2k( jd + n) 2kn
Taking iuto acconnt the terms involving the gap parameters:
the gap eqitation c m be written as in the Last chapter by intergratiug (1.11)
hy parts:
It is conveaient to define some au,.Ciliary functions as follows, dter using
t rigonometnc identities and element ary integrations:
and
( 1 ) = -2(Iy + jy) h ( l y + j y ) - 2(ly - j y ) h( ly - fi)
84
With thcse, we find (3.26) caii be written as
For Aud > 1 the fitnction I" = O. Ths, in tliis limit, I (n) becomes
Inserting (3.31) into (3.271, the gap ecliiation is
where T = ; z ~ . " " Together with Eq.(2.18), we then fincl the gap eqiiation can
be d t t e n as foilows:
3.1 A Calculation of A ( ~ ) / A ( ~ ) at Zero Temperature
From Eq.(3.33), we can fincl the thickness dependence of the gap parameter
at zero temperature by taking the third term as zero:
whtw d ( x ) is $\-en 1 - (2.E) for -\Qd > 1. For n giwu J . tilt- al>ow qliiatiou
grurra tes j qiiat bus. and uitmerica- solvhg t hese tytiations giws t hr gap
I~ths ior . \P+ o d y d i s r . t ~ ~ ~ A ( J ) / ~ ( " ) which are preseutecl in Figures 5.5 to j.8
for different dries of b/nc and various valites of j.
Figs. 5.5 Si 5.6 represents the cases of bla, = 0.01, LV = 40. iuid b/crc =
0.01. .V = 10. The residts are as espectecl. wliich incikates the method iu this
muge provicles reasonable residts for smail valiies of b/a, as one lowers N at
T = o.
Figs. 5 .ï QL 5.8 represents the cases of blci, = 0.5. .V = -40. and blcr, = 0.5.
N = 10. Both configurations gives unexpectecl behavior and thiis iiiclicate the
methocl in this range does not give reasonable results.
Figure 5.5: The gap parameter ratio A(~)/A(') forN = 40,6/n, = 0.01, at zero
temperat ure
6 8 10 12 Layers
Figure 5.6: The gap parameter ratio A ( ~ ) / A ( ~ ) forN = 10, bla, = 0.01, at zero
temperature
18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 Layer
Figure 5.7: The gap parameter ratio &j) /~(*) l forN = 40, b/a, = 0.5, at zero
temperature
Temperat ure
.4rcorcling to t lie crit ical truiperatiire stiicly7 most of the iineiupectecl I)cb.zvior
is ne= S = O, but for T T, the e?cpected (hi&) critical temperature is
rencliecl for al1 cases. To investigate the gap paraaieters at finite temperature.
WC integrate the 1 s t part of Eq43.33):
Mter integrating we can mite down the gap equation as
tqtiation may be solvecl uumerically for different valtics of blci,. T/T, ancl
varioits vdues of j. The temperatiirc clepenclent gap puameter A can be
present the N = 30 ancl blrr, = 0.01 resiilts at finite temperattire. The gap
paranieters clecrease for increasing j, as es~ected, even at zero temperature.
Thtis, we eqect we can 'trust' the residts for N ancl bla, for ail valties of the
Figs. 5.11 Si 5-12 present the N = 40, b l a , = 0.5 .witl LV = 10,b/cr, = 0.5
resiilts. From this %e see that the gap parmeters become better "beLaveci"
thwi they are at zero temperature.
8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 Layer
Figure 5.9: The gap parameter ratio ~ \ ( j ) / ~ ( j - l ) forN = 40, bla, = 0.01, at
fini te t cmperature
12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 Layer
Figure 5.10: The gap parameter ratio A(~)/A(') forN = 40, bla, = 0.01, At
Finite Temperatrire
8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 40 44 Layer
Figure 5.11: The Gap Parameter Ratio @ / A ( ~ ) forN = 40, b/n, = 0.5, at
finite temperature
6 Layer
Figure 5.12: The gap parameter ratio .@/A(*) forN = 10, bla, = 0.5, at
finite temperature
Chapter 6
A "New Modelv of the Single
Layer
We have focincl the critical temperature as a fiinction of the wiclth "a" for
the single layer case where we assumec1 a constant gap parameter over the
entire region in Chapter 4. In this Chapter the cdculation of the transition
temperature for this single layer will be attempted to be improved by a way
which extends the approach presented by the foregoing model by using gap
parameters that have an approximate spatial dependence. It will be shown
that the critical thickness gets enhanced by a factor of 5-50 over that of the
single layer with an assumed constant gap parameter over the entire region.
These two models are in agreement at low temperature, but this new model
cloes not give the expected results at high temperature.
1 Physical Mode1
The central iissiiniption of the prcvîous work is that the order paralueter is
onifonii iu the S layer ancl zero in t hr normal Iayer. Howewr. re.dist ir gap pa-
rauieters are expectecl to have some spatial clependence, being peakcd ueai- t Le
center ascl cl-ving off somewhat towards the &es of a aven super<roucliirting
layer. rUso, in the finite superIattice system, we had shown for valiies of the
pararueters thst codd be tnistecl that the gaps at the central regions me l.zrg-
cr t han in t lie other regions, ancl siibsecpently clecrease away bom the central
layer when the wiclth of the normal Layer "b" is small, which can be foiincl in
Figs. 5.9 Si 5.10. The physical system we are going to clisciiss presently is as
follows.
-4ccorcling to Fig 5.9, if we imagine letting "b" tencl towards zero, then
the situation is For a single Iayer superconductor, where we have a r b i t r d y
divicled it into some "21V + 1" zones. We then self-consistently calculate the
gap parameter in each zone, and Let "N" go to infinity and "a7' tend to zero
but keeping the total width of superconductor constant as
where "a" is width of the superconductor in a particular zone. In this way
the gap parameter over the entire region is not some constant, but can be of
different heights in each region, approxirnating in a sense a spatially dependent
pair amplitude. This potential is sketched in Fig. 6.1.
Figue 6.1: Gap puameter dependence on spatial
2 Thickness Dependence of the Self-Consist ent
Gap Equation
2.1 A Calculation of the Critical Thickness at Zero
Temperature
Ive now use such a theoretical mode1 to find the critical thickness A, below
which it is not possible to maintain the superconducting state. This may be
obtained from the original gap equation that we found for the finite superlattice
in the 1st chapter:
1- letting T = O. Tho. WC c m nrite the gap ecliiatiou for tlus. nt zero
tr cos O - sin cr a( l + 2Xy) c o s [ ~ ( 1 + 2Ng)1 - s i ~ [ ~ ( l + 21&/)] + cl
+ Q
wliere we have definecl
Mth
If one lets
LVe then take iV + oo, a + O such that A is constant, and the gap equation
becomes
then solvc (2.7) with tlus limitation aucl get the critical thichess at zero
This gives the critical thichess in this nioctel for which the siiperconcliict ivity
\-anishes s t T = O . Here Sd is Debye temperature, a, is the critical thickness
at zero temperature assilming a constant gap parameter tlirotighoiit, and 'Tc
is the biilk superconctiic t ing transit ion temperat tire.
The restdt &O may be written in terms of
by recailiug the effective interaction by Fet ter (371 as
2.2 Thickness Dependence of the Critical Tempera-
Havhg founcl the cntical t hichess at zero temperatiire. we cnn inimecLiate1~-
calculate the t hichess clepenclence of the critical temperat i ~ r e by re t iirning to
Eq42.1). This leluls to the gap equation at finite temperature:
+ pci(a) + asi(a)] - (2Ny)[2ci(2~Vg) + 21Vy)si(2ny + l)]
with
& = & A r ac R Tc
1 & = - 2N+L
T = 6~
2A = (2iV + 1)(2a) we obtain the foilowing equation by using (2.7) :
For srud r. ititegratiug the secoticl terni of this qiiation aucl letting Ar 4 CC.
rvt. gct TIT, as a fiuictiou of A/aC . Td ancl Tc:
this b i t becomes
The ecpatiou for the critical thichess foi&
see that the integrai in (2.13) in
Eiom (2.13) may be conveniently
Recdling that the critical thickness at zero temperature is
we can see immediately bom (2.14) and (2.15) that A = Ac when T is zero.
h case worth noting is the limit 6 < 1, for which we obtain the simple
which may be e-yendecl (2.16) mund A/& = 1 to first order to give
Near -41-4, = 1. the r~tic-al temperattire T/r. approacli zero liiiearly. tkis Iw-
Liavior l~eing siniilar to t tic prcvioiis ruoclel clisc-tissecl iu chsp ter 4. h p~-iricipli~.
tliis uen approacli shoiilcl leacL to the s m e wstilt ol~tained bq- the wrlirr one
for d > 1, -4 -. x;. However. tks liniit does not give the c o ~ ~ e c t c-riticril
tenipernture Tc as t h bu& value Tc.
Note that in the above we must solve Equation (2.13) for a partictllar
siiperconcliictor with various values of T, .ancl ri; typicaI such values arc sliown
in the table 1.
Table 1. Tansition Temperture and Debye Temperature
Fig 6.2 presents n~unerical resiilts of the gap equation ancl shows the cliffi-
c d t y in applying the new formula at high temperatine. For low temperatures
the resdts agree with the analytic result of (2.1T), but, as jiist mentionecl, for
high temperattires the results do not approach the correct biilk vahie. This
tinexpected behavior may indicate that the method is valid only for relatively
t hin superconduc t h g films, over which the position-depenclent pair ampli tilde
does not Vary too greatly.
Figure 6.2: The critical temperature dependence on the thickness for New
Model
3 Cornparison and Discussion
3.1 Critical Thickness
Having conipleted the estension of the theory, we now cornpue it nith the
earlier moclel. FVe founcl the ctïtical thichess at zero tempe rat tu^ as
aucl if we recd that g N ( 0 ) % 0.2 - 0.4 for clifferent sitperconductors, Erom
Eq-(3.18) one c m get
In this moclel, the criticd thickness gets enhanced by a factor of 5-50 over t bat
of the single layer approximation usect in Chapter 4 ancl 5.
One coulcl pictiue titis residt as follows. Let us consicler n single layer of
thickness 2A with a constant gap parameter. At T=O lowering il 4 a, results
in the superconductor becoming normal (by definition of a,). One coidd view
this as the Cooper Pairs inside the superconductor (which give rise to the
stiperconductivity) 'leaking out' to the normal metal. The bond between the
Cooper pairs thus gets broken, and the superconductivity disappears.
Cooper Pair
Cooper Pair Broken
Howerer. the gap parmeter is not really constant. in space, wllich WC
~uight approximate as a series of (2N + 1) steps as s h o m by Fig 6.1. Bitt
with stich a fom, the superconcluctivity is 'wealrer' as one goes towwcls the
eclges, ancl hence one might expect the Cooper pairs to 'le& out' faster in
t hese weaker regions. Thus, A is decreased, one might expect in this moclel
the supercondiictivity to disappear qiücker, comparecL to the case where one
assumes a constant gap parameter over the eatire region. In other worcls, in
the present model one could expect A, > a,. and this is what is found.
The critical thickness at zero temperature in the earlier model, (1, =
0.882c0, may be compared with that obtained by Zaitsev [9, 101, who con-
sidered the same problem using the GL theory. The expression for the critical
thickness in that approach is
ivhcr~ c(3) = 1202. The orcler-of-uiagnitttck agreecmcut hctweeu t lie tn-o
approacLcs for t Le vdiic of the criticd t hichess siiggwts the p r o g f i u n-c a w
followhg is a rc.wonabIe one.
We bave &O seen the two limiting cases of the grrp ecpation obtained iu
Chapter Foiw: r *; 1 aucl r » 1. Once agah Rie r n q compare the results
of tliese with that obtainecl by the GL theory worked out by Zaitsev[9. 101.
where it is foiinci
where ci, here refers to ZaitsevTs value for the critical thickness, (3.20). The two
limiting cases corresponcling to o u linùting case (3.37) ancl (3.39) of Chapter
Four are
and
Thiis, there is a cWerence even in the function form of the asymptotic depen-
dence of the cntical temperature as a 4 oo between the two rnethods. In
Fig 4.3 we present the numerical solution of (3.42) of Chapter Four giving the
dependence of the critical temperature over the entire range of thichesses. A
r c )i~q)ai-isoii tc-i t li Zaitsev* solii t ion. as d l as t hat oht ainecl iu t lic t iiirncliug
iiioclrl of McMillau cau Iw foiincl refercucc [-Y. Therc- is not a grmt clif-
ftmmce Iwtween the resdts of the t h e methoch, kclicsthg ouce agi:~h oiu-
approach semis reasouable. However, we me Iookiug at the clccui limit wc-itli
ided boimclaries, and thus we e-xpect the presence of irnpiuities and scat ter-
ing s t the interfaces to rediice the coherence length of the sitperconclucting
electrons. iniplying s siibsec~iient recluction of the cnticai tliichess. This cle-
peucleuce of the critical temperature on the thicliness (3.34)(Cliapter 4) shoiilcl
then be seen as provicling an upper bo~mcl.
3.2 Tnfinite Superlattice
In orcler to compare the finite superlattice with an infinite sitpeirlat tice [38] at
the critical temperature, we briefiy present a calcitlation of the critical temper-
at ure for clean infini t e superlat tices which incorporates explici t ly i ts inherent
Bloch nature. The coefficients in Eq (1.2) of Chapter Five are rlrteminecl by
the normalizat ion condition
by continuity at the interface, and by the requirement of Bloch's theorem:
for periodic systems, where d = a + b is the lattice period and q is the Bloch
wavevoc t er.
For nout ririal solutions t lie foUott-ing condition is t L m n~.cssai-y:
iu tkc limit that A approach zero. In this liniit the gap eqii;ztiou also siniplifies.
aucl cleteruiioes the transition temperature Z ( n , 6 ) frorn
For infinite b, the function J(T, r ) vanishes, and an analysis of the oth-
er terms yields the solution T,(a,) = O. We also see from this that J ( r , r )
then represents coherence effects the other layes introduce to the single 6lm
geomet ry-
In Fig. 6.3 we show some results for the transition temperature cletermined
by (3.24). Here we plot the reduced critical temperature TfTc as a function
of a/a, for various values of bla,. We see that for about 6 > a,, the critical
temperature corresponds closely to that of a single film embedcled in an infinite
normal metal, with significant cleviation o c c 6 g only for around a < a,.
0.031 62 0.1 0.31 62 1 3.162 10 31.62 100 aiac
Figure 6.3: The dependence of the reduced transition temperature T/Tc on
the Thickness a/= for infinite superlattice.Solid Iuie represents single layer.
Dash line represents bla, = 5. Dot-dash line represents bla, = 0.5. Dash-dot-
dotted represents bla, = 0.05
AIso. WC firicl for tirùtc h tliat T, (cL-b) = O o d y for a = 0. iudic-nting sri
alxxmcc OF n çriticd thiçliliess .as Lisppens for idbite b.
Now we compare the restllts with o t k r bilaver approximations in tlir
Cooper M t . It is hown that iii tliis limit the cle Genncs- CVertlianier [G. 7-81
approaches are unable to couipletely accoiint for the observecl behavior of the
t rmsition temperat ure[39, 40,41] . Uncler such a conciition FVethamer's restilt ,
clescribecl in Chapter -4, becomes
whereas the de Germes resiilt recluces to that of Cooper [4]:
As we can see from these e-upressioos, for a fixecl ratio blrr, as the thickness
CL tends to zero the crit ical temperature approaches a finite constant. On the
O t her hand, E y .@.%)for small t hickness yields the result
which, again for fixecl bla, approaches zero as a Mnishes. This approach to
zero is of the same form as that fo-md io the MeMillan Mode1 [21] and agrees
qualitat ively with corrections to the de Gennes t heory .
With the preceding discussion in mind we now return to a cornparison of
the finite superlattice results of the critical temperature in Figs.5.3 with that
of the infinite superlat tice in Fig.6.3. Restricting the cornparison to thin films,
for a-hirli the resiilts sceui rcIiziblc., WC coitlcl çoriçliicIe that a fiuite siiperlat tic-c
approsiiiiates w l l au infiuitr siiperlattice for n reasouably suiidI utiiuller of
1 ~ + e i s ciucept For w1-y thin films. for n-hich qiiautitative cki-iatious are sceu For
a smcd nimber of layers. However, for very thin layers we have to takc Lito
account the fnct that the approximation hoa > 1 t a c l in tleriving Ecpatiou
will begin to break clown, where A = 2kFn. We have, thotigh, checlied tliat
the ft~U expressions no t assiiming ARd ) 1 give essentially the same ctwes <as
in Figs.5.3 ancl 5.4 except for the extreme b i t of cil i t , -r O. Thiis, a reliable
conclusion from this analysis seems to be that for thin layers with ci/n, and
bfn, less than about 0.1 one neecls more than around 40 sripercontliicting films
I~efoi-e a finite size superlat tice behaves, as fcw ris the critical temperature is
concernecl, Lilie an iclealizecl infini te stiperlat tice-
4 Summary
It has been shown that a method for the self-consistent solution of the Bogoli-
ubov equation for various systems: the single layer, finite superlat tice syst em
and infinit e superlattice, discussed in t his thesis, give a trac table and reason-
able t heoretical treatment .
For the different models under consideration, we studied solutions of the
gap equation obtained from the self-consistency condition impcwed on the pair
arnplit ude, t hereby ob taining the t emperat ure and t hickness dependence of the
gap pararueter. Sewral Ferrt~ires obtainecl I)y the prortdiire rat1 Iw si~tiiiiiarizcd
f>ri~flj-*
( 1 ). The depeuclence of trmsitiou temperature T(û.b J) for a fininite super-
lat-tice system Lias beeu stticliecl. Under the asstuuption ARd > 1. the results
show- t hat T 4 Tc t Le right Mt is reached for al1 cases, but itnespec t ed restil ts
appear for s m d T. The valiclity of this methocl hw been checkeci in the single
laycr-s case ancl the innnite snperlattice case, ancl has also heen coaipcved with
ot ker technicpes. Particidarly in the case of the b1chiiiIa.n tiinneling moclel
which assiunes the samples are in some sense cLirty, the generd cliialitative
agreement between the various techniques siiggests that this approach and the
cîssi~iptions contain in it are physiccdly reasonable [24]. This provicles tis with
a mat hemat i cdy well-clehed approach for cle terminhg the properties of t hin
film systems ~ising only the parameters containecl in the BCS theory of bulk
siiperconcluct ors.
(2). There are two different approaches to the single layer case that have
been discussed. The first is that the electron pair amplitude in the supercon-
ducting regions is spatially constant over the entire region. The second at-
tempts to give some spatial dependence to the gap parameter in a simple way.
We found that in this latter approach the critical thichess at T = O gets en-
hanced by a factor 5-50 over that of the former approach. The critical thickness
clepenclence of temperattire of this new mode1 was stuclied numerically and an-
dyticdy. The restilts show tliat near A/Ac=l, the critical temperattue T/Tc
approaclirs zero liuearly. Imt it clorsu't givr t h criticai tr~upc*ratiisc T as t h
I~iilk vnlw Tc when the stipcrcondiictor is hiik. This iiiiespectetl I~cli~vior
uiay intlirtztc t h the mctlioct is wlicl only for relat ively thin stipercon<liict-
ing b i s , oves which the posit ion-clepenclent pair tunpliti~cle cloes not van- too
greatly. so that the gap paranieter is approskiatecl reasonably by a coustant.
(3) The thickness ancl temperature clepeudence of the gap paraniet ers
were s tiidiecl niuiiericaiiy in the h i t e stiperlat tice system. The resdts show
the gap parmeters becomc hetter "behavecP' at finite temperature than that
nt zero temperattire. In principle, at a temperature T/Tc of aroiincl 0.8 the
gap paranieter shoiilcl stay constant for al1 layers, since the critical tempera-
tues approaclies the bi& vali1es for this region. which is tnie for the infinite
stiperlattice. One wotdcl thus expect the gap parameter to have the sanie
value for ail j. In fact. we could not extract this conclusion, since in high
temperatures the widt h of the superconducting layer is becoming larger, ancl
the approximation that the gap parameter is constant over the wiclth of the
layer is poorer.
From (2) and (3) above, the procedure outlined in the thesis indicates
that the method is reasonable for low temperatures (thin films) but not too
good for high temperatures ( thick films). This shows that the approximation
of a constant gap parameter is good only for thin layers, where the true gap
fiuiction doesn't have the "space" to vary too much , whereas for thicker layers
the tnie gap function can vasy rapiclly, and so assiuning it to be a constant
Appendix A
Int egrals
From chapter four, Ec1.(3.23), we have
where the ftinction H(x) is c1ehecI as
xcosx - sinx ~ ( x ) = + zSi(x) + 2Ci(x).
x
In this appendix we calculate the integral
We h t consider a general expression with parameter a.
(1). We have
(3). \Ne next have
Lct t ing
for which 2
ch = ~1.r ~inh-~(rn.r/2) u = - lii[tanh(.ni~/4)]. TT
(4). FVe finally consider
Thus, siuiuning the various terms, we have
where t = srzl4, we obtain
Bibliography
[I] H. Meissner, Phys. Rev. 117: 672 ( 1960).
[2] Smith, P. H.. S. Shapiro, J. L. Miles .mcl J . Nichal, Phys Rwktt. 6: 686
(1961)-
[3] Rose Innes, A. C. and B. Serin, P h p . Rev. 1: 278 ( 1961).
[-II L. N. Cooper, Phys. Reu. 6: 689 (1961).
[5] L.P. Gov'kov, Sou. Phys.-JETP 9, 1364 (1959)
[6] P. G. de Gennes and E. Guyon, Phys.Lett. 3: 168 (1963)
[7] N. R. \Verthamer, Phys. Rev. 132: 2440 (1963).
[8] P. G de Gennes, Rev. Md. Phys 36: 225 (1964).
[9] R. O. Zaitsev, Sou. Phys.- JETP 21, 426 (1965)
[IO] R. O. Zaitsev, Sou. Phys.-JETP 21, 1178 (1965)
[il] A. E. Jacobs, Phys. Rev. 162: 375 (1967).
[ E l P. G. clc Geunrs r u c l D. Saiut-.James. Piws. letf 4151 ( 1963).
[13] Et. 41. C l c - Phys. Rev. B5: 67 (1972).
[l4] G. B. . h o ~ c l . Phys. Rev. B. 18: LOT6 (1978).
[15] O. Entio - Woldman ancl T. Bar-Sagi, Phys. Rev. B 18: 3175 (1978).
[16] M. P. Zaitlin. Phgs. Reu. B 25: 5429 (1982).
[E] DS-Fcdk, Phys. Rev. 132: 15ïG (1963).
[18] W. L. McMiilan, Phys. Rev. 175: 559 (1968)
[19] -1. Bardeen, R. k~mmel, A. E. Jacobs, ancl L. Teworclt . Phys. Reu. 187.
556 (1969)
[20] A. F. Andreev, Sou. Phys -JETP 19, 1228 (1964)
[21] W. L. McMillan, Phys. Reu. 175, 537 (1968)
[22] J . Bardeen, Plys. Reu. Lett 6, 57 (1961)
(231 M. H. Cohen, L. M. Falicov, and J. C. Phillips, Phys. Rev. lett. 8 316
(1962)
[24] R. L. Kobes, J. P. Whitehead, Phys. Rev. B36: 121 (1987).
[25] H. Frohlich, Proc. R. Soc. London A 215: 291 (1952).
[26] Bardeen, L, N. Cooper, and J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. 29: 1175 (1957).
['LS] C. A Reyuobls. B. Seriu. W- H. Wright ,PIgs. Rev. 78: 487 ( 1950).
[-91 d. R. Schrieffer, - Tlieo7-y of s~~perconLictivity*- W. -4. Benjamin. Reading,
Massachiiset ts
[31] J . J . Hamer, C. H Tlietierer. .uicl N. R Pkrthmer, Phys. Rev. 142: 11s
(1966).
[32] R. P Groff ancl R. D Parb, Phgs. lett 22:19 (1966)
[33] P. G. Gnnes, and G. Scanna, J- Appl. Phys. 34, 1380 (1963).
[34] E. Guyon Superconcluctivity eclited by \Vallace 781 (1969)
[35] Hancibook of Mat hematical Functions, Natl. Bur. Stand. Appl. Math. Ser.
No.55, eclited by M-Abramowitz and 1. A. Stegun (U. S. GPo, tvashiag-
ton, D.CJ(l96.L).
[36] J. Wang Prozirnity effect and the themodynamic p~opert2es of Superlattice
System Master thesis 92
[37] A. L. Fetter, J. D. Walecka, Quantum Theory of Many Parlicle System
McGmw-Hill, Inc. (1971)
[38] R. L. Kobes, J. P. Whitehead and B. J. Yuan Phys lett A 132, 182 (1988).
[41] P. R. ;\r»il. .J. R. Ketterson. Proc. 15th Int. Conf. on Ion- tempcratiuiB
physics. .Iap71. J . Appt. Phys 26, Suppl. 26-3(198ï)