The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

20
THE NLP META MODEL AND TR’S PRECISION MODEL Understanding the patterns And how to respond

description

The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model. Understanding the patterns And how to respond. Distortions. Mind Reading – Claiming to know someone’s internal state. Ex. “You don’t like me!” Response – “How do you know…” Ex. “How do you know I don’t like you?” - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

Page 1: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

THE NLP META MODELAND TR’S PRECISION MODEL

Understanding the patternsAnd how to respond

Page 2: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

Distortions Mind Reading – Claiming to know

someone’s internal state. Ex. “You don’t like me!”

Response – “How do you know…” Ex. “How do you know I don’t like you?”

Prediction – Recovers the Source of the information.

Page 3: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

Distortions Lost Performative – Value judgments

where the person doing the judging is left out. Ex. “It’s bad to be inconsistent.”

Response – “Who says it’s bad?” “According to whom?” “How do you know it’s bad?”

Prediction – Gathers evidence, the source of the belief, the strategy for the belief.

Page 4: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

Distortions Cause – Effect – Where cause is wrongly

put outside the self. Ex: “You make me sad!”

Response – “How does what I’m doing cause you to

choose to feel sad?” A counter example is “How specifically?”

Prediction – Recovers the choice.

Page 5: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

Distortions Complex Equivalence – Where two

experiences are interpreted as being synonymous. Ex. “She’s always yelling at me, she doesn’t like me!”

Response – How does her yelling mean that she…?” “Have you ever yelled at someone you liked?”

Prediction – Recovers complex equivalence. Suggests a counter example.

Page 6: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

Distortions Presuppositions – Ex. “If my spouse knew how

much I suffered, they wouldn’t do that.” I suffer. My spouse acts in some way. My spouse doesn’t know I suffer.

Response – “How do you choose to suffer?” “How are they (re)acting?” “How do you know he doesn’t know?”

Prediction – Specify the choice & the verb, and what they do. Recovers the internal representation, and the complex equivalence.

Page 7: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

Generalizations Universal Quantifier – Universal

generalizations such as all, every, never, everyone, no one, etc. Ex. “She never listens to me.”

Response – Find counter examples. “Never?” “What would happen if she did?”

Prediction – Recovers counter examples, effects and outcomes.

Page 8: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

GeneralizationsModal Operators

Modal Operators of Necessity – As in should, shouldn’t, must, must not, have to, need to, it is necessary. Ex. “I have to take care of her.”

Response – “What would happen if you didn’t?” “What would happen if you did?” “Or?”

Prediction – Recovers effects and outcomes.

Page 9: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

GeneralizationsModal Operators

Modal Operators of Possibility – As in can/can’t, will/won’t, may/may not, possible/impossible. Ex. “I can’t tell him the truth.”

Response – “What prevents you?” “What would happen if you did?”

Prediction – Recovers Causes.

Page 10: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

Deletions Nominalizations – Process words which

have been frozen in time, making them nouns. Ex. “There is no communication here.”

Response – “Who’s not communicating what to whom?” “How would you like to communicate?”

Prediction – Turns it back into a process, recovers deletion, and reference index.

Page 11: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

Deletions

Unspecified Verbs – Ex. “He/She rejected

me.”

Response – “How specifically?”

Prediction – Specifies the verb or action

Page 12: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

DeletionsSimple Delations

Simple Deletions – Ex. “I am

uncomfortable.”

Response – “About what/whom?”

Prediction – Recovers the Deletion

Page 13: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

DeletionsSimple Delations

Lack of Referential Index – Fails to specify a person or thing. Ex. “They don’t listen to me.”

Response – “Who, specifically, doesn’t listen to you?”

Prediction – Recovers the referential index.

Page 14: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

DeletionsSimple Delations

Comparative Deletions – As in good, better, best, worst, more, less, most, least. Ex. “She’s a better person.”

Response – “Better than whom?” “Better at what?” “Compared to whom, what?”

Prediction – Recovers the comparison.

Page 15: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

TR’s Precision Model Simplification of the NLP Meta Model Uses the fingers as a Mnemonic device to

remember the Model.

Page 16: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

TR’s Precision Model

Too MuchToo ManyToo Expensive

Compared to What?

Page 17: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

TR’s Precision Model

Nouns: PersonPlaces Things

Who or what specifically?

Page 18: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

TR’s Precision Model

Verbs: ActionState orOccurance

How Specifically?

Page 19: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

TR’s Precision Model

Should / Shouldn’tMust / Mustn’tCan / Can’t

What would happen if you did?What causes or prevents?

Page 20: The NLP Meta Model and TR’s Precision Model

TR’s Precision ModelUniversalsAllEveryNever

Question the universal…All?Every?Never?