8. DTP-containing Vaccines Including Pentavalent and Hexavalent
The new kid on the block - hexavalent vaccines
-
Upload
gaurav-gupta -
Category
Health & Medicine
-
view
154 -
download
2
Transcript of The new kid on the block - hexavalent vaccines
The new kid on the blockHexavalent Vaccines!
Dr Gaurav Gupta,Pediatrician,
Mohali (Chandigarh)RajPedicon - Nov, 2016
Conflict of Interest
• Received grants from various vaccine manufacturers including – Sanofi Pasteur– GSK– Abbott– Novartis
WIIFY
• Need for Combination Vaccines• Safety, efficacy of Hexavalent Vaccines• Indian Data• Scheduling• Some Unique Features
What I won’t be talking about?
• aP versus wP• Components• Pricing
Combination Vaccines – Why?
• Simplified Immunization Schedule• Less injections – Complications• Better Compliance• Lesser administration time/ costs
Combination vaccines – Why not?
• Technically difficult• Expensive
Hexavalent Vaccines across the World
• Hexavac – discontinued• Infanrix Hexa – GSK – with lyophilised Hib• Hexaxim – Fully liquid 6 in 1 with DPT + Hep B
+ Hib + IPV
Hexavalent Vaccines across the World
• Hexavac – discontinued• Infanrix Hexa – GSK – with lyophilised Hib• Hexaxim – Fully liquid 6 in 1 with DPT + Hep B
+ Hib + IPV
Efficacy
• As compared to other aP vaccines• As compared to wP vaccines, specifically
against Pertussis
HEXAXIM® immunogenicity assessment - Overview
●8 primary series studies
●3 primary schedules (6, 10 & 14 weeks; 2, 3 & 4 and 2, 4 & 6 months)
●With or without hepatitis B vaccination at birth
●versus different control vaccines:
• wP-based combination vaccines
• PENTAXIM® + standalone hepatitis B vaccine
• INFANRIX-HEXA (DTaP-IPV-HBV//Hib***)
• Concomitantly with other routine pediatric vaccines
*Tritanrix®-HepB/Hib **CombAct-HIB® *** Infanrix Hexa®
0
20
40
60
80
100
D T PT FHA PV1 PV2 PV3 HBsAg Hib
Immunogenicity v/s whole cell-based vaccines
HEXAXIM® induces high immune responses similarto those of wP-based combination vaccines
Seroprotection/seroconversion rates after the 3rd dose of HEXA or a wP-based combination vaccine in infants vaccinated at 6,10 &14 weeks of age
(South Africa)1 (No HepB vaccine at birth, no concomitant vaccine)
Sero
prot
ectio
n/Se
roco
nver
sion
rate
s (%
)
D T PT FHA PV1,2,3 HBsAg Hib 0.01 IU/mL 4-fold increase
(pertussis antigens)1/dil 8 10 mIU/mL 0.15 µg/mL
98 96 100 10094
8393
58
10093
99 100 100 98 96 95 95 100
HEXAXIM® 1 n=220
DTwP//Hib* + OPV + Hep B vaccine 1 n=212
* CombAct-HIB® [1] Madhi et al. PIDJ, 2011;30(4)
0
20
40
60
80
100
D T PT FHA PV1 PV2 PV3 HBsAg Hib
The immune response to all HEXAXIM® antigens is high and similarto that of PENTAXIM® co-administered with standalone hepatitis B vaccine
Sero
prot
ectio
n/Se
roco
nver
sion
rate
s (%
)
D T PT FHA PV1,2,3 HBsAg Hib 0.01 IU/mL 4-fold increase
(pertussis antigens)1/dil 8 10 mIU/mL 0.15 µg/mL
100 100 100 10092 93 93 90
100 100 100 100 100 100 99 10095 97
HEXAXIM® n=260
PENTAXIM® + Hep B vaccine n=271
[5] Tregnagui et al. PIDJ, 2011;30(6)
Seroprotection/Seroconversion rates after the 3rd dose of HEXA or PENTA in infants vaccinated at 2, 4 & 6 months of age
(Argentina)5 (No Hep B vaccine at birth, no concomitant vaccine)
Immunogenicity Vs PENTAXIM®
Completion of a 3-dose primary series and a booster administration in the first 2 years of life with the investigational DTaP-IPV-HB-Hib vaccine in toddlers induced strong Ab responses towards the antigens included in the investigational vaccine which persisted in significant percentages of children at 3.5 years of age
Safety
• Safety as compared to wP vaccines
HEXAXIM® safety assessment - Overview
Evaluated in 20 clinical trials in more than 6000 infants and toddlers
●18,000 doses administered to > 6000 infants in 20 clinical trials
●With or without hepatitis B vaccination at birth
●versus different control vaccines:
• wP-based combination vaccines
• PENTAXIM® + standalone hepatitis B vaccine
• INFANRIX-HEXA (DTaP-IPV-HBV//Hib***)
• Concomitantly with other routine pediatric vaccines
[19] Sanofi Pasteur. Data on file
Solicited reactions after any dose of HEXAXIM® or DTwP-HepB//Hib*in infants vaccinated at 2,4 & 6 months of age (Mexico & Peru)3 (No concomitant vaccine)
Pain Red Swell A Fever Vom Crying Somnol Anor Irr0
20
40
60
80
100
The reactogenicity of HEXAXIM® is consistently lower than that ofwP-based combination vaccines
Gr3: grade 3 *Tritanrix®-HepB/Hib [3] Macias et al. PIDJ, 2012;31(8)
78 94
59 71
17 36
3 6
43 67
1 6
75 93
4 6
30 31
2 3
78 92
3 5
57 69
5 6 3 5
82 92
46 59
6 10Rea
ctio
n in
cide
nce
(%)
HEXAXIM® n=1422
DTwP-HepB//Hib* n=711
Any Gr3 Any Gr3 Any Gr3 Any Gr3 Any Gr3 Any Gr3 Any Gr3 Any Gr3 Any Gr3Pain Redness Swelling Fever Vomiting Crying Somnolence Anorexia Irritability
Tolerability Vs. wP-based combination vaccines
Safety in primary and booster series Key points
Well tolerated under various primary schedules (6-10-14 weeks, 2-3-4
and 2-4-6 months)
Better tolerated than wP-based combination vaccines
Comparable to other licensed aP-based combination vaccines
(PENTAXIM®, Infanrix Hexa)
The safety and reactogenicity - not affected by the administration of
hepatitis B vaccine at birth
* Infanrix® Hexa
Indian Data
IMMUNOGENICITY AND SAFETY OF DTaP-IPV-HB-PRP-T COMBINED VACCINE GIVEN AT 6, 10 AND 14
WEEKS OF AGE IN INFANTS FROM INDIA, WHO PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED A DOSE OF HEP B VACCINE AT BIRTH
Presenting Author: Prof Sanjay LalwaniDate : 23 January 2016
Venue : PEDICON – Hyderabad
WHO Universal Trial Number (UTN): U1111-1127-6936
Immunogenicity (Primary objective): % Seroprotection and Vaccine Response one month after 3 doses
Anti-D (≥ 0.01 IU/mL )
Anti-T (≥ 0.01 IU/mL )
Anti-PT (Vaccine
response)
Anti-FHA (Vaccine
response)
Anti-Polio 1 (≥ 8 (1/dil)
Anti-Polio 2 (≥ 8 (1/dil)
Anti-Polio 3 (≥ 8 (1/dil)
Anti-Hep B (≥ 10
mIU/mL)
Anti-PRP (≥ 0.15 μg/mL)
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00% 99% 100%94%
99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%
20
Safety: Solicited reactions from D0 to D7, any grade, after each injection (in %)
21
Tenderness Erythema Swelling0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
19.00%
4.60%10.30%
13.80%
3.40% 3.40%
11.90%
0.60%6.50%
Post Dose 1 Post Dose 2 Post Dose 3
Fever Vomiting Abnormal Crying
Drowsiness Loss of appetite
Irritability0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
7.5% 9.8%16.1%
9.8%6.9%
22.4%
8.6%3.4%
9.8%3.4% 3.4%
16.7%
7.1%3.0%
7.7%3.0% 3.0%
12.5%
Post Dose 1 Post Dose 2 Post Dose 3
54.6% experienced at least 1 solicited systemic reaction.
Most frequently reported systemic reaction was irritability (36.2%)
19.0% of subjects reported fever ; no Grade 3 fever reported
Injection site reactions
37.9% experienced at least 1 solicited injection site reaction, most frequent being tenderness (30.5%).
2.9% of subjects reported Grade 3 reactions
The incidence lowered with successive doses with no Grade 3 reaction reported after the third dose
Systemic reactions
What Schedule works?
HepB seroprotection rates (%≥10mIU/ml) and GMT (IU/mL) following different HepB immunization regimen
HB regimen
Infant series product & regimen
Post Infant series responses
Toddler product
Pre toodler booster
Post toddler booster
0 + 2 + 1 HXM 3-58 97,2% - 401 HXM (11/12) 87,6% - 76 96,4% - 1,370
0 + 3 + 0HXM 2-4-611 99,2% - 1,148 -
HXM 2-4-612 99,2% - 986 -
0 + 3 + 1
HXM 2-3-45 94,0% - 149 HXM (15/18) 80,7% - 44 97,3% - 1,379
HXM 2-3-49 97,5% - 24296,1% - 267 HXM (12) 90,1% - 76
91,4% - 9598,9% - 2,23098,9% - 2,233
HXM 2-3-410 95,7% - 207 HXM (11/18) Ongoing Ongoing
HXM 2-4-62 98,3% - 1,142 HXM (15/18) 89,8% - 93 99,4% - 2,553
HXM 6-10-143,4 95,7% - 330 HXM (15/18) 78,9% - 51 98,5% - 4,630
1 + 3 + 0HXM 6-10-147 100% - 2,491 -
HXM 2-4-66 99,5% - 2,477 -
1 + 3 + 1
HXM 6-10-143,4 99,0% - 1,913 HXM (15/18) 94,7% - 228 100% - 44,893
HXM 2-4-61 99,7% - 3,013 HXM (12/18) 97,5% - 386 99,7% - 8,462
IH (12/18) 97,7% - 406 99,5% - 11,218
IH 2-4-62 100% - 2,766 HXM (15/18) 99,2% - 336 100% - 9,688
1. Lopez P & al. ICID 2012 & ESPID 2014 2. Aquino A & al. Vaccine 2012 3. Madhi S & al. PIDJ 20114. Madhi S & al. PIDJ 2013 5. Ceyhan M & al. ACPID 2010 6. Kosalaraska P & al. Int JID 20117. Lalwani S & al. PEDICON 2016 8. Vesikari T & al. ESPID 2015 9. Vesikari T & al. ESPID 2015 and 201610. Prymula R & al. ESPID 2016 11. Tregnaghi MW & al. PIDJ 2011 12. Lanata C & al. Vaccine & Vaccinations 2012
HepB immunization and use of hexavalent vaccines
The use of Hep-B containing combination vaccines in the first year
of life primary series offers below possibility:
●To adopt Hep B immunization regimen by using an hexa-only infant
primary series regimen
●Lead to a “0” (birth) + 3 +/- 1 (second year of life) regimen: “birth + 3 +
1” or “birth + 3 + 0”
Recommendations
WHO
IAP
Unique Features
Presentations
HEXAXIM® is available as FULLY LIQUID:30
●Needleless pre-filled syringes (box of 1 and 10) with two needle
lengths for optimal flexibility (16 mm 25G, 25 mm 23G)
• With double detachable labels for easy documentation
[30] Sanofi Pasteur. HEXAXIM®. Summary of Product Characteristics
Registered in more than 100 countries
Technological innovation
THANK YOU
Missed something? Get my presentations at
www.slideshare.net/gauravg
Acknowledgement: Dr Sujatha Shetty, Sanofi Pasteur
Comments/ Questions