The New California Aging Reporting System and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

52
The New California Aging Reporting System and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

description

Driving CARS. The New California Aging Reporting System and Data Reporting Principles November 2008. Workshop Outline. 1. Background. Background. 1995 National Aging Program Information System (NAPIS) 1997 ManAGE 1998 CDA and C4A Vision Statement 1999 Senate Bill 910 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The New California Aging Reporting System and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Page 1: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

The New California Aging Reporting System

and Data Reporting Principles

November 2008

Page 2: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

6. Questions And

Answers

5. Data Validation

4. DataReporting

3. Data Collection

2.Client-Level Reporting

1. Background

CARS

Page 3: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

6. Questions And

Answers

5. Data Validation

4. DataReporting

3. Data Collection

2.Client-Level Reporting

1. Background

CARS

Page 4: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

1995 National Aging Program Information System (NAPIS)

1997 ManAGE 1998 CDA and C4A Vision Statement 1999 Senate Bill 910 2003 U.C. Policy Research Center 2006 Common Data Set 7/1/2008 California Aging Reporting System

(CARS)

Page 5: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Multi-phased, multi-year project

From aggregate data to client-level data

Web-based access

From program “silos” to comparative data across all programs

Page 6: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Phase 1 NAPIS State Program Report (SPR), including Family Caregiver Support

Program (FCSP) Registered and Non-Registered services Client-level data for Registered services only

Phase 2 Community-Based Services Programs (CBSP) Reports

Alzheimer’s Day Care Resource Center; Linkages; Senior Companion Program (aggregated data)

Health Insurance Counseling and Advocacy Program (HICAP) (client-level data)

Page 7: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

6. Questions And

Answers

5. Data Validation

4. DataReporting

3. Data Collection

2. Client-Level Reporting

1. Background

CARS

Page 8: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008
Page 9: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Aggregate Data Data collected and reported by AAAs as a total over a specific time

period (quarterly or annually) Represents the total number of occurrences within a

geographic/program All data is stored in unique non-correlated silos Ability to relate/link only single variables

Client-Level Data Data that contains demographic and service information for each

unique client across all AAA programs All data can be linked to individual client utilization of services Ability to relate/link multiple variables Annual Assessments

Page 10: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Registered Service Utilization by Ethnicity: Hispanic/Latino

Cluster 1

Registered Service: Total Hispanic Clients: 30,535

Personal Care

Homemaker ChoreHome Del. Meals

ADCHCase Mgmt.

Total # of Hisp. Clients: 324 691 157 8150 246 3,460

% of total Hispanic Clients enrolled

1% 2% .5% 27% .8% 11%

Registered Service: Total Hispanic Clients: 30,535

Congregate Meals Nutrition Counseling Assisted Transp.

Total # of Hispanic Clients: 22,381 904 808

% of total Hispanic Clients enrolled 73% 3% 2%

Cluster 2

Page 11: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Further Analysis Possibilities

Participation Differences

Common Variables

Common Needs

Page 12: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Feb 08 Apr 08 Jun 08 Aug 08 Oct 08 Dec 08 Feb 09 Apr 09 Jun 08 Aug 09

We are here

Page 13: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

6. Questions And

Answers

5. Data Validation

4. DataReporting

3. Data Collection

2. Client-Level Reporting

1. Background

CARS

Page 14: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Starts at Intake

Complete, accurate record collection results

in reliable, valid data.

Page 15: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

More than 2.7 million registered clients

561,971 were missing age data.

In addition, hundreds of thousands had ethnicity, poverty, rural, and even gender data missing!

From U.S. Administration on Aging, July 2008

Page 16: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

California Missing Data for Registered Services, FY 2006-07

Element Total Missing % Missing

Lives Alone 30,380 15%

Gender 24,373 12%

Race 24,188 12%

IADLs 9,628 12%

Rural 22,633 11%

ADLs 6,778 9%

Age 16,982 8%

Poverty 1,522 1%

Page 17: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

IT system/database problem identification and resolution Provider training and data collection tools Provider contracts stating minimum acceptable missing

data Onsite provider monitoring Connect a “needs improvement” provider with an

outstanding provider Best Practices – Management of Service Providers

(www.aging.ca.gov/aaa/guidance/aaa_administration.asp)

Page 18: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

6. Questions And

Answers

5. Data Validation

4. DataReporting

3. Data Collection

2. Client-Level Reporting

1. Background

CARS

Page 19: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Quarter 1July-August-September

Quarter 2October-November-December

Quarter 3January-February-March

Quarter 4April-May-June

Annual Reports

Page 20: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Quarter 1 July+August+September

Quarter 2 July+August+September+October+November+December

Quarter 3 July+August+September+October+November+December+ January+February+March

Quarter 4 July+August+September+October+November+December+ January+February+March+April+May+June

Page 21: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Annual Aggregate Reporting Non-Registered Services Nutrition Services Incentive Program (NSIP) Meal Count for Non-

Registered Clients Staffing Profile, Provider Profile, Unduplicated Client Count, Focal Point.

Verification of all 4 previously reported quarters

Last chance to update, modify or change your data

Collaboration between providers and AAA staff (MIS, fiscal, program, planners and contract representatives)

Page 22: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

6. Questions And

Answers

5. Data Validation

4. DataReporting

3. Data Collection

2. Client-Level Reporting

1. Background

CARS

Page 23: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

AoA Software Logic Error Checks

Visual Logic Error Checks

Questionable Data Error Checks

Annual Verification to CDA prior to submission to AoA

Page 24: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

1,900 AoA Logic Error Checks for NAPIS SPR data

Occur during submission of each quarter and annual data files

Page 25: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Review and validate data by:Provider prior to submitting to AAAAAA prior to submission to CARS.

Providers, and MIS, fiscal, program, planners and contract staff should collaborate.

Page 26: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008
Page 27: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Age: Total clients served for each service must be equal to the sum of all age groups + missing age. Same for Race

Gender: Total clients served must be greater than or equal to male clients + female clients + missing gender.Same for ADL, IADL, Ethnicity, Rural, Lives

Alone, Poverty

Staffing Report: Each column must add up to the column total.

Page 28: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Software Logic Error Examples, (continued)

Unduplicated Client Count: Total clients for “All Services” must be less than or equal to the clients for “Registered Services” + “Non-Registered Services.”

One person is one unduplicated client.

One person can only be counted once as a registered client across all 9 registered services and once as a non-registered client across all 5 non-registered services, and once as a client across all combined services.

Example: Richard Clemmens receives 3 registered services and 2 non-registered services. Previous SPR 102: Count as one client in each of the three registered services. Previous SPR 105: Count as one unduplicated client in “Registered Services,”

one in “Non-Registered Services,” and one in “All Services” columns.

Page 29: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Software Logic Error Examples, (continued)

The number of providers cannot be zero if service units are greater than zero.

Previous SPR 101, 102, 103, 107: Report service units, clients, providers, and expenditures for each service you provide with OAA funds.

Page 30: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Logic Error Report Applies only to CBSP programs. Corrected report must be submitted. Mathematical errors (e.g., number/sum must be equal to; greater

than or equal to; less than or equal to). Example: 100 total clients, 80 with ages and 10 missing age; yet 80 + 10 does not

equal 100.

Questionable Data Error Report Applies to SPR and CBSP programs. Either a corrected report or explanation must be submitted. Data is questionable (e.g., no/few numbers reported, missing data). Example: In ALZ 101 report, 1 volunteer and 1000 volunteer hours are reported.

Was the number of volunteers, volunteer hours, or both reported incorrectly?

Page 31: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008
Page 32: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Logic Errors

Questionable Data Errors

Report Type Questionable Data Error Questionable Data Error Explanation

Previous SPR 102

No/Few Rural Clients. Zero or very few rural clients is questionable – may be correct or incorrect.

Senior Companion

1. The first, second, or third quarter reported Counts of Seniors served.2. The fourth quarter reported No Count of Seniors served.

According to PM 00-15(P):1. In the first three quarters, report 0 for all categories, except for volunteer hours.2. In the fourth quarter, report an

annual unduplicated number of seniors served.

Report Type Logic Error Logic Error Explanation

Previous SPR 102

Reported 50 Rural Clients plus 10 Missing Rural Clients and a Total Client count of 40.

Rural Clients plus Missing Rural must be less than or equal to Total Clients.

Senior Companion

Reported 0 Poverty Volunteers and 5 Total Volunteers.

Poverty Volunteers must equal Total Volunteers (program eligibility requirement).

Page 33: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Correct SCC 101 Report

Category Unit Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Total

AIDS/HIV Count 0 0 0 0 0

ALZ Count 0 0 0 3 3

etc. Count 0 0 0 0 0

Other Srs Count 0 0 0 9 9

Vol. Hrs Hours 700 820 750 890 3160

Questionable Data Error Examples, (continued)

Page 34: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

CDA Web Site

www.aging.ca.gov

Page 35: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Click on the AAA tab.

Page 36: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008
Page 37: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008
Page 38: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008
Page 39: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008
Page 40: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Click on Guidance, thenCDA Operations and Best Practices Guide.

Page 41: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008
Page 42: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008
Page 43: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008
Page 44: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

CDA Statistical Fact Sheets

(continued)

Page 45: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Click on Statistics / Demographics.

Page 46: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008
Page 47: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

CARS Upload Web Site: ca.getcare.com Alana Hawkins: [email protected], (510) 986-6700, Extension 511 Q&A Email: [email protected]

CDA Data Team Data Team Email: [email protected]

Tim Henry (Paper Reports) [email protected] (916) 928-5859 Michael Alward (PSAs 1-11) [email protected] (916) 928-3331 Lilit Tovmasian (PSAs 12-22) [email protected] (916) 928-4668 Sharon Kleefeld (PSAs 23-33) [email protected](916) 419-7568

(continued)

Page 48: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

In the future…

Web-based orientation/training

GoToMeeting

(continued)

Page 49: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

AAA Staff (MIS, Fiscal Officer, Planner/Contract/Program Rep)

Providers Software Vendor California Department of Aging U.S. Administration on Aging

Page 50: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

Thank You!

Page 51: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008

6. Questions And

Answers

5. Data Validating

4. DataReporting

3. Data Collection

2. Client-Level Reporting

1. Background

CARS

Page 52: The New California Aging Reporting System  and Data Reporting Principles November 2008