The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

31
The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy? Taeko M. Frost

description

The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?. Taeko M. Frost. What is the Mozart effect?. “… the increase in brain development that occurs in children under age 3 when they listen to the music of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart…” – Alfred A. Tomatis - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Page 1: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Taeko M. Frost

Page 2: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

What is the Mozart effect?

“… the increase in brain development that occurs in children under age 3 when they listen to the music of Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart…” – Alfred A. Tomatis

Improvements: health & medicine, spatio-temporal reasoning & IQ

Page 3: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

In the Media

The Mozart effect has been a popular topic in print and broadcast media

– Parenting

– Education

– Music publications

Page 4: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Origin of Research on the Mozart Effect

Frances Rauscher & Gordon Shaw of The University of California at Irvine

Page 5: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Areas of Interest

Brain development

Health benefits

Intelligence enhancement

Page 6: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Brain Development

Preliminary research based on the trion model of the cerebral cortex

Research hypothesized that listening to Mozart “warms-up” neural transmitters in the cerebral cortex (Rauscher et al., 1993)

Page 7: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Brain Development

Increased EEG coherence (Rauscher, Shaw & Ky 1995)

Increased correlation of neurophysiologic activity in the temporal and left-frontal cortexes (Sarnthein et al., 1997)

Increased spatio-temporal ability after piano lessons (Rideout et al., 1996)

Changes in amplitude of alpha rhythm and increased inter-hemispheric coherence (Rauscher, 1997)

Page 8: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Brain Development

The increases in spatio-temporal ability is due to the arousal from listening to the music (Steele, 2000; Thompson, Schellenberg & Husain, 2001)

Increase in performance ability may be due to personal preference (Nantais & Schellenberg, 1999)

Page 9: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Health Benefits

Don Campbell leading Mozart Effect enthusiast– “The Mozart Effect : Tapping the Power of Music to Heal the

Body, Strengthen the Mind and Unlock the Creative Spirit” – Personal testimonials– Merchandise

Zell Miller, Governor of Georgia– Designated money to provide all newborns with Mozart

CD’s (Sack, 1998)

Page 10: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Health Benefits

If listening to Mozart’s music provides possible health benefits, why was Mozart himself so frequently ill?

Based on anecdotal evidence

Page 11: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Studies supporting the existence of the Mozart effect

Page 12: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Spatial Ability

Spatial ability is the ability to reason about visual scenes and is a basic dimension of human intelligence, clearly separate from verbal intelligence or general reasoning ability…

Page 13: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Intelligence Enhancement

1993: Rauscher, Shaw and Ky conducted the first experiment to test the Mozart Effect– 36 undergraduate students– Paper folding and cutting task– Increased spatial ability after 10-15 minutes– 8-9 point increase in IQ using the Stanford Binet

Page 14: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Results

Page 15: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Intelligence Enhancement

1995: Rauscher, Shaw and Ky reproduced the effect– 79 undergraduate students– 3 groups

Mozart Phillip Glass Silence

– The Mozart group was the only group to show enhanced IQ scores

Page 16: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Studies contradicting the existence of the Mozart effect

Page 17: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Intelligence Enhancement

1995: Rauscher, Shaw and Ky conducted a further experiment to test the Mozart Effect– 28 undergraduate students– Paper folding and cutting task– Mozart Sonata for 2 pianos D Major vs. Listening

to a story read aloud – No difference indicated personal preference

Page 18: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Intelligence Enhancement

1993: Rauscher and Shaw conducted an experiment comparing Mozart and Pop music– 55 children (age 11-13)– Mozart Sonata for Two Pianos in D major vs. Pop– No main effect for music or test performance

Page 19: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Intelligence Enhancement

1997: Steele, Ball and Ruck conducted a study that contradicted the presence of the Mozart effect

– 36 students– 3 groups

Mozart Rainfall Silence

– Digit span task– No difference in the conditions

Page 20: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Intelligence Enhancement

Lois Hetland of the Harvard Graduate School of Education

Attempted to replicate the Mozart effect – 1014 students– 3 groups– Mozart group performed better

Could be explained by chance Gender, musical tastes and training, innate spatial

ability, and cultural background

Page 21: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Meta-analysis of 16 studies

Page 22: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Intelligence Enhancement

A meta-analysis of 16 studies carried out by Rauscher & colleagues concluded that IQ is enhanced by an average of 1.4 general points as measured using the Stanford-Binet IQ test (Chabris, 1999)

Page 23: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Intelligence Enhancement

Further analysis found that when spatial intelligence is assessed, there is a 2.1 increase in IQ (Chabris, 1999)

This suggest that listening to Mozart increases spatial ability, NOT intelligence

Page 24: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Intelligence Enhancement

“Any cognitive enhancement is small and does not reflect any change in IQ or reasoning ability in general, but instead derives entirely from performance on one specific type of cognitive task and has a simple neuropsychological explanation…”

-Chabris, 1999

Page 25: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Further questions

There has been no study to date examining intelligence in infants and young children– Youngest group examined mean age was 11

years old (McKelvie & Low, 2002)

Should the previous studies be considered occurrence of the “Mozart effect” by the definition of Tomatis?

Page 26: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Further questions

There has not been a study, to date, that has asked for demographics (e.g. ethnic background, gender, socioeconomic status, etc.)

Do you think this is important?

Page 27: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Graduate Studies

University of Toronto– E. Glen Schellenberg– PhD Cognition, Perception and Cognitive Neuroscience

Center for the Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, University of California at Irvine

– Dr. Frances Rauscher– PhD in Experimental Psychology

M.I.N.D Institute, UC Davis – Dr. Gordon Shaw– PhD in Autism Research

Appalachian State University– Dr. Kenneth Steele– PhD Learning/Experimental Analysis of Behavior

Page 28: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

References

Chabris, C. F. (1999). Prelude or requiem for the 'Mozart effect'?. Nature, 400, 826-827. Hughes, J. R. (2001). The Mozart effect. Epilepsy & Behavior, 2, 396-417. McKelvie, P. & Low, J. (2002). Listening to Mozart does not improve children's spatial

ability: Final curtains for the Mozart effect. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 241-258.

Nantais, K. M., & Schellenberg, E. G. (1999). The Mozart effect: An artifact of preference. Psychological Science, 10 (4), 370-373.

Rauscher, F. H., Shaw, G. L, & Ky, K. N. (1993). Music and spatial task performance. Nature, 365, 611.

Rauscher FH, Shaw GL, Ky KN. Listening to Mozart enhances spatial–temporal reasoning: towards a neurophysiological basis. Neurosci Lett 1995;185:44 –7.

Rauscher FH, Shaw GL, Levine LJ, Wright EL, Dennis WR, Newcomb RI. Music training causes long-term enhancement of preschool children’s spatial–temporal

reasoning. Neurol Res.1997;19:2– 8. Rideout, B. E. & Taylor, J. (1997). Enhanced spatial performance following 10 minutes

exposure to music: A replication. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 85, 112-114.

Page 29: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

References

Rideout, B. E., Dougherty, S., & Wernert, L. (1998). Effect of music on spatial performance: A test of generality. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 512-514.

Sack, K. (1998, January 15). Georgia's governor seeks musical start for babies. The New York Times, A-12.

Sarnthein J, von Stein A, Rappelsberg P, Petsche H, Rauscher FH, Shaw GL. Persistent patterns of brain activity: an EEG coherence study of the positive effect of music on spatial–temporal reasoning. Neurol Res 1997;19:107–16.

Steele, K. M., Ball, T. N., & Runk, R. (1997). Listening to Mozart does not enhance backwards digit span . Perceptual and Motor Skills, 84, 1179-1184.

Steele, K. M., Bass, K. E., & Crook, M. D. (1999). The mystery of the Mozart effect: Failure to replicate. Psychological Science, 10 (4), 366-369.

Steele, K. M., Brown, J. D., & Stoecker, J. A. (1999). Failure to confirm the Rauscher and Shaw description of recovery of the Mozart effect. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 88, 843-848.

Steele, K. M. (2000). Arousal and mood factors in the "Mozart effect". Perceptual and Motor Skills, 91, 188-190.

Thompson, W. F., Schellenberg, E. G., & Husain, G. (2001). Arousal, mood, and the Mozart effect. Psychological Science, 12 (3), 248-251.

Page 30: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

What do you think?

Page 31: The Mozart Effect: Fact or Fallacy?

Thank you!