The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic...

21
The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing Yossef S. Ben-Porath Department of Psychology Kent State University Kent, OH [email protected] Disclosure Yossef Ben-Porath is a paid consultant to the MMPI publisher, the University of Minnesota, and distributor, Pearson. As co-author of the MMPI-2-RF he receives royalties on sales of the test. Agenda MMPI-2-RF Overview Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Admissibility Discussion

Transcript of The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic...

Page 1: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form)

Forensic Practice BriefingYossef S. Ben-Porath

Department of PsychologyKent State University

Kent, [email protected]

Disclosure

Yossef Ben-Porath is a paid consultant to the MMPI publisher, the University of Minnesota, and distributor, Pearson. As co-author of the MMPI-2-RF he receives royalties on sales of the test.

AgendaMMPI-2-RF OverviewUsing the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic AssessmentsAdmissibilityDiscussion

Page 2: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

MMPI-2-RF Overview338-item version of MMPI-2

Released August, 2008Authors: Ben-Porath & TellegenSubset of MMPI-2 poolNorms based on MMPI-2 sampleMMPI-2 remains available and supported

MMPI-2-RF Overview• 51 Scales

• 9 Validity Scales• 3 Higher-Order Scales• 9 RC Scales• 23 Specific Problems Scales

• 5 Somatic/Cognitive• 9 Internalizing• 4 Externalizing• 5 Interpersonal

• 2 Interest Scales• 5 PSY-5 Scales

Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments

Page 3: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments

Why?Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance in forensic assessments

Self-presentationPsychopathologyPersonality characteristicsBehavioral proclivities

Shorter instrument more likely to produce valid results in individuals who struggle with 567-item inventoryLess time to interpretMore likely to generate reliable interpretation

Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments

Challenges:Familiarity (Competence)Adversarial system

Familiarity (Competence)

DocumentationManual for Administration, Scoring and InterpretationTechnical Manual

Interpreting the MMPI-2-RFSupport competent use of the test

Page 4: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Familiarity (Competence)

TrainingNational Program of General and Setting-Specific Workshopshttp://psychcorp.pearsonassessments.com/pai/ca/training/workshops/MMPI.htm

Adversarial System

Introduction of a newer version of an existing instrument provides fodder for the cross-examinerCan challenge:

Admissibility (rare)Weight of the evidence (deposition/trial testimony)

Ben-Porath (2012):

Page 5: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Daubert Factors and the MMPI-2-RF

Daubert Factors

Has the technique been tested?

Has it been subjected to peer review?

What is the technique’s known or potential rate of error?

Are there standards controlling the technique’s operation?

Is the technique generally accepted?

Has the technique been tested?

Are empirical data available on the technique?

MMPI-2-RF Technical Manual

Page 6: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Has the technique been tested?

Internal structural analyses:Intercorrelations between 51 MMPI-2-RF Scales

Normative and clinical samplesCorrelations between MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF

Validity ScalesSubstantive Scales

N=5,07039,855 correlations

Has the MMPI-2-RF been tested?

Empirical Correlates inMental Health

OutpatientInpatient

MedicalSubstance Abuse TreatmentForensic- CivilForensic- CriminalNon-Clinical

N= 4,336 Men; 2,327 Women605 Criteria53,970 Correlations

Page 7: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

MMPI-2-RF: Standard Comparison Groups

MMPI-2-RF Normative (Men & Women)Outpatient, Community Mental Health Center (Men & Women)Outpatient, Independent Practice (Men & Women)Psychiatric Inpatient, Community Hospital (Men & Women)Psychiatric Inpatient, VA Hospital (Men)Substance Abuse Treatment, VA (Men)Bariatric Surgery Candidate (Men & Women)Spine Surgery/Spinal Cord Stimulator Candidates (Men & Women)Chronic Pain Evaluee (Men & Women)College Counseling Clinic (Men & Women)College Student (Men & Women)Forensic, Disability Claimant (Men & Women)Forensic, Independent Neuropsychological Examination (Men & Women)Forensic, Pre-trial Criminal (Men & Women)Forensic, Child Custody (Men & Women)Forensic, Parental Fitness Evaluee (Men & Women)Prison Inmate (Men & Women)Personnel Screening, Law Enforcement (Men, Women & Combined)Personnel Screening, Corrections Officer (Men, Women & Combined)Personnel Screening, Clergy Candidates (Men, Women, & Combined)

Page 8: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Forensic –Criminal Defendants

Forensic, Pre-Trial Criminal

VRIN-r TRIN-r F-r Fp-r Fs FBS-r RBS L-r K-r

Mean - Men 54 52 75 59 64 60 63 55 46Standard Dev 10 10 28 15 20 16 19 12 11Mean - Women 54 50 69 56 66 65 62 54 46Standard Dev 10 10 23 15 22 16 17 11 11

MMPI-2-RF Validity Scales

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

VRIN-r TRIN-r F-r Fp-r Fs FBS-r RBS L-r K-r

Men (n=551) Women (n=223)

T

Forensic Pre-Trial Criminal

EID THD BXD RCd RC1 RC2 RC3 RC4 RC6 RC7 RC8 RC9

Mean - Men 59 62 61 60 60 58 56 64 66 56 60 52Standard Dev 15 18 12 14 15 14 12 13 18 14 16 11Mean - Women 61 56 54 61 63 58 52 59 59 56 56 48Standard Dev 14 15 11 14 15 14 11 12 16 13 14 10

MMPI-2-RF Higher-Order (HOD) and Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

EID THD BXD RCd RC1 RC2 RC3 RC4 RC6 RC7 RC8 RC9

Men (n=551) Women (n=223)

Higher-Order Restructured Clinical

Page 9: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Forensic Pre-Trial Criminal

MLS GIC HPC NUC COG SUI HLP SFD NFC STW AXY ANP BRF MSFMean - Men 59 57 56 61 60 63 55 57 55 56 60 54 53 48Standard Dev 14 16 13 16 16 24 14 13 12 12 17 13 12 9Mean - Women 63 62 61 61 59 57 53 59 57 58 62 53 55 55Standard Dev 13 18 14 15 16 19 13 13 13 12 17 12 13 10

MMPI-2-RF Somatic and Cognitive Scales

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

MLS GIC HPC NUC COG SUI HLP SFD NFC STW AXY ANP BRF MSF

Men (n=551) Women (n=223)

Somatic Internalizing

Forensic Pre-Trial Criminal

JCP SUB AGG ACT FML IPP SAV SHY DSF AES MECMean - Men 62 62 55 52 54 49 54 51 55 45 57Standard Dev 14 15 13 13 14 11 12 11 14 10 10Mean - Women 55 57 50 52 55 52 54 52 52 49 44Standard Dev 12 13 11 13 14 11 12 11 11 11 7

MMPI-2-RF Externalizing, Interpersonal, and Interest Scales

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

JCP SUB AGG ACT FML IPP SAV SHY DSF AES MEC

Men (n=551) Women (n=223)

Externalizing Interpersonal Interest

Forensic Pre-Trial Criminal

AGGR-r PSYC-r DISC-r NEGE-r INTR-r

Mean - Men 53 61 60 58 55Standard Dev 11 18 11 13 12Mean - Women 47 54 51 59 54Standard Dev 9 15 10 13 13

MMPI-2-RF Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) Scales

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

AGGR-r PSYC-r DISC-r NEGE-r INTR-r

Men (n=551) Women (n=223)

Page 10: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Prison Inmates

Prison Inmates

VRIN-r TRIN-r F-r Fp-r Fs FBS-r RBS L-r K-r

Mean - Men 52 51 59 55 54 48 51 57 47Standard Dev 11 10 17 13 13 11 12 11 10Mean - Women 54 51 62 56 59 55 55 58 46Standard Dev 11 11 19 13 16 13 14 11 10

MMPI-2-RF Validity Scales

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

VRIN-r TRIN-r F-r Fp-r Fs FBS-r RBS L-r K-r

Men (n=34933) Women (n=7353)

T

T

Prison Inmate

EID THD BXD RCd RC1 RC2 RC3 RC4 RC6 RC7 RC8 RC9

Mean - Men 50 55 63 52 53 49 58 65 59 50 54 53Standard Dev 11 13 12 10 11 10 11 12 14 11 12 11Mean - Women 54 56 58 55 59 51 57 61 58 54 55 51Standard Dev 11 13 11 11 13 11 11 12 13 12 12 11

MMPI-2-RF Higher-Order (HOD) and Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

EID THD BXD RCd RC1 RC2 RC3 RC4 RC6 RC7 RC8 RC9

Men (n=34935) Women (n=7354)

Higher-Order Restructured Clinical

Page 11: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Prison Inmate

MLS GIC HPC NUC COG SUI HLP SFD NFC STW AXY ANP BRF MSFMean - Men 53 51 51 53 51 51 50 50 51 51 53 51 53 48Standard Dev 9 11 11 12 12 13 11 10 10 10 13 11 11 8Mean - Women 56 55 57 57 53 51 50 52 53 52 56 52 57 56Standard Dev 11 14 13 13 13 13 11 11 11 11 14 11 13 10

MMPI-2-RF Somatic and Cognitive Scales

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

MLS GIC HPC NUC COG SUI HLP SFD NFC STW AXY ANP BRF MSF

Men (n=34935) Women (n=7354)

Somatic Internalizing

Prison Inmate

JCP SUB AGG ACT FML IPP SAV SHY DSF AES MECMean - Men 65 62 53 50 50 45 49 48 51 46 61Standard Dev 13 15 12 11 11 8 10 10 11 9 9Mean - Women 60 59 51 52 52 48 51 50 51 49 46Standard Dev 12 14 11 12 12 9 10 10 11 10 8

MMPI-2-RF Externalizing, Interpersonal, and Interest Scales

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

JCP SUB AGG ACT FML IPP SAV SHY DSF AES MEC

Men (n=34935) Women (n=7354)

Externalizing Interpersonal Interest

Prison Inmate

AGGR-r PSYC-r DISC-r NEGE-r INTR-r

Mean - Men 57 54 63 52 48Standard Dev 11 13 11 11 10Mean - Women 52 55 54 55 50Standard Dev 10 13 10 12 10

MMPI-2-RF Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) Scales

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

AGGR-r PSYC-r DISC-r NEGE-r INTR-r

Men (n=34935) Women (n=7354)

Page 12: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Forensic –Disability Claimants

Forensic, Disability Claimants

VRIN-r TRIN-r F-r Fp-r Fs FBS-r RBS L-r K-r

Mean - Men 52 51 78 57 70 75 74 56 43Standard Dev 9 10 22 13 21 14 19 11 10Mean - Women 51 51 73 55 69 79 73 57 45Standard Dev 9 10 21 12 22 14 18 11 10

MMPI-2-RF Validity Scales

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

VRIN-r TRIN-r F-r Fp-r Fs FBS-r RBS L-r K-r

Men (n=523) Women (n=480)

T

T

Forensic Disability Claimant

EID THD BXD RCd RC1 RC2 RC3 RC4 RC6 RC7 RC8 RC9

Mean - Men 65 58 56 65 74 66 53 55 60 58 59 51Standard Dev 13 14 12 12 13 14 11 12 14 14 13 11Mean - Women 64 56 46 64 75 64 49 49 56 58 57 46Standard Dev 13 12 10 12 13 13 11 11 13 14 12 9

MMPI-2-RF Higher-Order (HOD) and Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

EID THD BXD RCd RC1 RC2 RC3 RC4 RC6 RC7 RC8 RC9

Men (n=523) Women (n=480)

Higher-Order Restructured Clinical

Page 13: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Forensic Disability Claimant

MLS GIC HPC NUC COG SUI HLP SFD NFC STW AXY ANP BRF MSFMean - Men 75 67 68 73 70 61 62 60 57 58 66 58 54 47Standard Dev 10 17 11 14 15 21 15 12 12 12 19 13 13 8Mean - Women 75 67 71 71 68 57 58 60 57 58 66 55 57 53Standard Dev 9 18 11 14 15 19 14 12 13 12 18 12 14 10

MMPI-2-RF Somatic and Cognitive Scales

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

MLS GIC HPC NUC COG SUI HLP SFD NFC STW AXY ANP BRF MSF

Men (n=523) Women (n=480)

Somatic Internalizing

Forensic Disability Claimant

JCP SUB AGG ACT FML IPP SAV SHY DSF AES MECMean - Men 58 50 55 49 52 47 57 52 56 41 57Standard Dev 13 10 12 11 11 9 12 10 15 8 9Mean - Women 50 46 49 50 54 51 55 51 53 46 44Standard Dev 11 8 10 11 12 10 12 10 13 9 7

MMPI-2-RF Externalizing, Interpersonal, and Interest Scales

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

JCP SUB AGG ACT FML IPP SAV SHY DSF AES MEC

Men (n=523) Women (n=480)

Externalizing Interpersonal Interest

Forensic Disability Claimant

AGGR-r PSYC-r DISC-r NEGE-r INTR-r

Mean - Men 54 57 55 61 61Standard Dev 11 13 11 13 14Mean - Women 48 56 45 60 59Standard Dev 8 12 9 14 14

MMPI-2-RF Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) Scales

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

AGGR-r PSYC-r DISC-r NEGE-r INTR-r

Men (n=523) Women (n=480)

Page 14: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Child Custody Litigants

Forensic, Child Custody Litigants

VRIN-r TRIN-r F-r Fp-r Fs FBS-r RBS L-r K-r

Mean - Men 43 52 47 45 46 50 47 56 59Standard Dev 8 7 9 6 8 8 9 12 9Mean - Women 45 52 49 46 48 56 49 55 58Standard Dev 8 7 10 6 11 11 9 12 9

MMPI-2-RF Validity Scales

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

VRIN-r TRIN-r F-r Fp-r Fs FBS-r RBS L-r K-r

Men (n=244) Women (n=239)

F

F

EID T HD BXD RCd RC1 RC2 RC3 RC4 RC6 RC7 RC8 RC9

Men (n=244) 42 47 47 43 44 47 43 48 51 40 45 43Standard Dev 9 9 9 8 8 9 8 9 11 8 8 9

Women (n=239) 46 49 43 47 49 48 43 45 53 44 46 42Standard Dev 11 9 8 11 11 10 7 9 12 9 7 7

Custody Litigants

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

EID THD BXD RCd RC1 RC2 RC3 RC4 RC6 RC7 RC8 RC9

Men (n=244) Women (n=239)

Higher-Order Restructured Clinical

Page 15: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Forensic, Child Custody Litigants

MLS GIC HPC NUC COG SUI HLP SFD NFC STW AXY ANP BRF MSFMean - Men 48 48 46 46 44 46 44 45 42 45 47 42 45 46Standard Dev 8 8 7 9 8 6 7 6 8 9 8 7 6 8Mean - Women 50 52 50 49 47 46 46 47 46 49 50 43 48 50Standard Dev 11 14 11 10 9 4 7 9 10 9 11 8 10 9

MMPI-2-RF Somatic and Cognitive Scales

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

MLS GIC HPC NUC COG SUI HLP SFD NFC STW AXY ANP BRF MSF

Men (n=244) Women (n=239)

Somatic Internalizing

JCP SUB AGG ACT FML IPP SAV SHY DSF AES MECMen (n=244) 50 47 44 43 44 48 48 43 45 43 55Standard Dev 10 7 8 9 8 8 8 8 5 8 9

Women (n=239) 46 46 44 45 46 51 47 46 45 47 45Standard Dev 9 7 7 8 9 10 10 9 6 9 7

Custody Litigants

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

JCP SUB AGG ACT FML IPP SAV SHY DSF AES MEC

Men (n=244) Women (n=239)

Externalizing Interpersonal Interest

AGGR-r PSYC-r DISC-r NEGE-r INT R-r

Men (n=244) 49 45 50 43 50Standard Dev 7 8 8 8 8

Women (n=239) 46 47 43 47 48Standard Dev 7 9 7 9 9

Custody Litigants

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

AGGR-r PSYC-r DISC-r NEGE-r INTR-r

Men (n=244) Women (n=239)

PSY-5

Page 16: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Parental Fitness Evaluees

Parental Fitness

VRIN-r T RIN-r F-r Fp-r Fs FBS-r RBS L-r K-r

Mean - Men 49 51 52 50 53 51 52 65 55Standard Dev 10 9 12 10 14 11 12 14 10

Mean - Women 51 52 55 52 54 57 54 64 53Standard Dev 11 11 15 11 14 12 10 14 11

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

VRIN-r TRIN-r F-r Fp-r Fs FBS-r RBS L-r K-r

MMPI-2-RF Validity Scales

Men (n=226) Women (n=336)

T

F

Parental Fitness

EID T HD BXD RCd RC1 RC2 RC3 RC4 RC6 RC7 RC8 RC9

Mean - Men 45 51 53 47 51 46 52 53 55 45 49 46Standard Dev 10 10 11 10 11 9 12 11 13 10 10 10

Mean - Women 50 51 49 51 55 49 50 52 56 49 49 44Standard Dev 12 11 10 12 12 11 11 11 13 12 10 9

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

EID THD BXD RCd RC1 RC2 RC3 RC4 RC6 RC7 RC8 RC9

MMPI-2-RF Higher-Order (HOD) and Restructured Clinical (RC) ScalesMen (n=226) Women (n=336)

Higher-Order Restructured Clinical

Page 17: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Parental Fitness

MLS GIC HPC NUC COG SUI HLP SFD NFC ST W AXY ANP BRF MSFMean - Men 49 50 51 52 49 48 46 47 47 47 49 46 48 47Standard Dev 10 10 11 11 10 8 9 9 9 10 10 9 9 9

Mean - Women 53 53 54 54 51 47 46 51 50 50 54 47 52 52Standard Dev 12 13 12 13 12 6 9 12 11 12 14 10 11 9

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

MLS GIC HPC NUC COG SUI HLP SFD NFC STW AXY ANP BRF MSF

MMPI-2-RF Somatic and Cognitive ScalesMen (n=226) Women (n=336)

Somatic Internalizing

Parental Fitness

JCP SUB AGG ACT FML IPP SAV SHY DSF AES MECMean - Men 57 48 45 46 46 46 51 46 48 43 62Standard Dev 13 8 9 11 9 8 10 9 9 8 9

Mean - Women 54 47 45 48 50 49 52 48 48 46 45Standard Dev 12 9 9 12 11 9 10 9 9 9 8

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

JCP SUB AGG ACT FML IPP SAV SHY DSF AES MEC

MMPI-2-RF Externalizing, Interpersonal, and Interest Scales

Men (n=226) Women (n=336)

Externalizing Interpersonal Interest

Parental Fitness

AGGR-r PSYC-r DISC-r NEGE-r INT R-r

Mean - Men 53 49 55 46 50Standard Dev 10 10 10 10 10

Mean - Women 49 50 47 51 51Standard Dev 8 11 9 12 10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

120

AGGR-r PSYC-r DISC-r NEGE-r INTR-r

MMPI-2-RF Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) ScalesMen (n=226) Women (n=336)

Page 18: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Has the MMPI-2-RF been tested?

Descriptive Data for following settings:Mental HealthMedicalSubstance Abuse TreatmentForensicCorrectionalPersonnel ScreeningNon-Clinical Settings

N=~68,000

Has the MMPI-2-RF subjected to peer review?

As of October 2012, 160+ peer-reviewed papers on MMPI-2-RF

General TopicsValidity ScalesCorrectional SettingsForensic Settings

Criminal DefendantsCivil litigants and disability claimantsChild CustodyParental Fitness

Mental Health SettingsMedical SettingsNon-clinical Settings

The known or potential rate of error of the MMPI-2-RF?

Data on reliability and standard error of measurement of MMPI-2-RF scale scores address this question directly

Available in Technical Manual Chapter 3Normative and Clinical Samples

Classification accuracy statistics (Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Powers)

Available in peer reviewed classification studies (e.g., malingering detection research)

Page 19: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Are there standards controlling the MMPI-2-RF?

Page 20: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Are there standards controlling the MMPI-2-RF?

Yes, and the availability of a standard set of interpretive guidelines enhances cross-interpreter reliabilityA desirable feature of any psychological testParticularly when used in forensic evaluations

Is the MMPI-2-RF Generally Accepted?

Frye TestMMPI-2-RF being used increasingly in:

Forensic (criminal and civil) evaluationsPublic safety personnel screeningMedical evaluationsMental health settings

In many states, case law guides judges to consider “Daubert-like” factors (i.e., scientific validity and reliability)Option: Administer MMPI-2 and score both versions

Page 21: The MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) Forensic Practice Briefing · Using the MMPI-2-RF in Forensic Assessments Why? Efficient, comprehensive, validated assessment of variables of relevance

Indications of MMPI-2-RF Acceptance

MMPI-2-RF interpretive guidelines provided in two leading textbooks:

Graham, J. R. (2012). MMPI-2: Assessing Personality and Psychopathology (5th edition). New York: Oxford University Press.

Greene, R.L. (2011). MMPI-2/MMPI-2-RF: An Interpretive Manual (Third Edition). New York: Allyn & Bacon.

Listed among recommended outcome measures in Traumatic brain injury research complied by Interagency Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Outcome measures Workgroup convened by NIH:

Wilde et al. (2010). Recommendations for the use of Common Outcome Measures in Traumatic Brain Injury Research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, 1650-1660.e17.

Listed as recommended measure in guide to establishing a practice on police pre-employment psychological evaluations:

Gallo, F. J., & Halgin, R. P. (2011). A Guide for Establishing aPractice in Police Preemployment Postoffer Psychological Evaluations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0022493

Discussion