The Marginal Paradigm - Texas A&M...
Transcript of The Marginal Paradigm - Texas A&M...
1
Utility Theory
• Utility is the satisfaction that a consumer expects to receive from the consumption of a good or service
• A consumption bundle is a particular combination of goods being considered for consumption
• A utility function is an algebraic expression that allows us to rank a consumption bundle by the total utility that it provides
Total Utility ExampleSuppose…Total Utility = (Quantity of Hamburgers * Quantity of Pizza)
12.52.0C
7.03.0B
10.02.5A
Total UtilityPizzaHamburgersBundle
25
21
25
The Marginal ParadigmMarginal utility is the change in total utility from the consumption of one more unit of a particular good
545474393302
--201
Marginal UtilityTotal UtilityQuantity of Hamburgers
10987
The Marginal Paradigm
• The Law of Diminishing Marginal Utilitystates that marginal utility will decline as more of a good or service is consumed during a specified period of time
• An indifference curve is a graph that shows all the bundles that provide a specific level of utility
• A budget constraint refers to the limitations on a consumer’s income
Engel’s Law
• Disposable income increases
• Percent of income spent for food decreases
The Consumption Decision
PizzaPizza
HamburgersHamburgers
IC 1IC 1IC 2IC 2
IC 3IC 3
2
Equilibrium
• Consumer Equilibrium describes the consumption bundle that maximizes utility and is within the budget constraint
• When relative prices change, consumers will purchase different bundles of goods– Substitution Effect: consumption changes due
to the substitution of one product for another– Income Effect: consumption changes due to
the increase or decrease in a consumer’s purchasing power
Demand
• A demand curve shows the willingness of a consumer to purchase a product at different prices in a specified market, ceteris paribus
• Change in quantity demanded refers to a movement along the demand curve as the price of the good changes
• A shift in demand refers to movement of the curve itself due to changes in…– Price of other products– Disposable income of consumers– Tastes and preferences
Demand for Fluid Milk
$1.70
$1.90
$2.10
$2.30
$2.50
$2.70
$2.90
150 200 250 300 350
Gallons per 1,000 Transactions
Pri
ce p
er G
allo
n
Supply
• A supply curve shows the willingness of a producer to provide a product at different prices in a specified market, ceteris paribus
• Change in quantity supplied refers to a movement along the supply curve as the price of the good changes
• A shift in supply refers to movement of the curve itself due to changes in…– Price of inputs– Technology– Workers’ wages
Non-Price Determinants of Supply and Demand
• Supply– Technology– Workers’ wages– Prices of inputs
• Demand– Population– Disposable income– Supply and prices of competing products– Consumer tastes and preferences
Elasticity• Own price elasticity
– Percentage change in quantity demanded with a 1% increase in price
• Cross-price elasticity– Percentage change in quantity demanded of x
with a 1% increase in the price of y• Income elasticity
– Percentage change in quantity demanded with a 1% increase in income
3
Price Elasticity of Demand
PPQQEP ∆
∆=
( ) [ ]( )( ) [ ]( )2
2÷+÷−÷+÷−
=BABA
BABAP PPPP
QQQQE
Cross-Price Elasticity of Demand
• Tells us if products are substitutes or complements
• Shows how demand is affected by the prices of other products
jj
iiij PP
QQE∆∆
=
Income Elasticity of Demand• Tells us if products are luxury items or
inferior goods• Shows how demand is affect by changes
in income
IIQQEI ∆
∆=
Total Revenue and EP
Price
Price
Inelastic(Elasticity < 1)
Elastic(Elasticity > 1)
Total Revenue Total Revenue
Total Revenue Total Revenue
Own-Price Elasticity of Demand
In General…
Functions of Marketing• Marketing Research• Buying and Selling• Credit (Finance)• Transportation and Storage• Risk Management• Standardization (and Grading)
The Food System
Food Commodities
Food Products
Farm Supply Farms First Handler
Processor Distributor Retailer
4
U.S. Food System Sales, 1996
Food Service
36%
Retail Food41%
Alcoholic Drinks
5%
Packaged Alcoholic
Beverages6%
Nonfood12%
Source: USDA, ERSSource: USDA, ERS
Macro Marketing
ProductionProduction AssemblyAssembly ProcessingProcessing WholesalingWholesaling RetailingRetailing ConsumptionConsumption
PRODUCTSPRODUCTS
PAYMENTSPAYMENTS
See Rhodes & Dauve, p. 6See Rhodes & Dauve, p. 6
Physical Marketing Functions
Form utilityProcessing
Time utilityStorage
Place utilityTransportation
Type of value addedFunction
Dr. Allen WysockiUniversity of Floridahttp://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/RM002
Farm
Grain Elevator ExportStorage/Working Inventory
Processing
Co-op
WasteSold for Human Consumption Sold for Animal
Consumption
ADM
Consumer
Gasoline Additive
Fuel Waste
Food Processing
Ethanol Production
5
Atomistic Competition
Market strategies:
Compete on:
Demand curve:
Entry/exit:
Product nature:
Number of sellers: Large
Homogeneous
Easy
Horizontal (price taker)
Cost
Timing of sales
Monopolistic Competition
Market strategies:
Compete on:
Demand curve:
Entry/exit:
Product nature:
Number of sellers: Many
Differentiated
Fairly easy
Downward sloping
Price and promotion
Pricing, branding, promotion, product design, packaging
Oligopoly
Market strategies:
Compete on:
Demand curve:
Entry/exit:
Product nature:
Number of sellers: Few
Either
Difficult
Downward sloping
A game of price and promotion
Pricing, plus the rest if product is differentiated
Processing Powerhouse
• 16,000 firms• 26,000 factories• Value-added
– Value of shipments less cost of inputs– Further processing and timely distribution
• 100 largest firms– 1970 – account for 50% of value added– 2001 – account for 75% of value added
Barriers to Market Entry
• Capital requirements• Degree of product differentiation• Patents• Secret processes• Government licensing
Concentration in Food Manufacturing
• Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)– Census Bureau method of classifying industries and
subsets of industries– Example: 20 – Food and Kindred Products’
Processing– Example: 2024 – Ice cream and ices
• Concentration Ratios– CR4 - % of total sales accounted for by the 4 largest
firms– CR8 - % of total sales accounted for by the 8 largest
firms
6
Conglomerate: Philip Morris New Product Introductions
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Food Items Non-Food Items
Food Industry Stats
RestaurantsRestaurants
$440$453
878
40
12
3.4
Sales(billions)
Locations(thousands)
Employees(millions)
GroceryGrocery
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs
Physiological SafetyPhysiological Safety
Love and BelongingLove and Belonging
EsteemEsteem
SelfSelf--ActualizationActualization
Measuring Marketing Costs
• Marketing Bill– Measures cost of processing and
distributing– Affected by farm and retail prices,
product mix, product quantity, and quantity of marketing services
• Market Basket– Tracks prices of a fixed quantity of US
Farm originated food products
Breakdown of the Consumer Food Dollar
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
Bill
ion
Dol
lars
(Cur
rent
)
Farm ValueFarm Value
Marketing BillMarketing Bill
7
The Consumer Dollar Farm Value Share of Food Expenditures
• Has dropped over time• Differs greatly among food products
– Decreases as the degree of processing and marketing services increases
– Animal products have higher farm value shares than crop-derived products
• Long-term changes are due to changes in the cost of labor and other inputs– These costs tend to rise over time
• Asymmetry: prices may not rise or fall at the same time or by the same amount
Food Expendituresas a Percent of Disposable Personal Income
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000
Perc
ent
Food at Home
Food Away From Home
Source: USDA / ERS
Food Expendituresas a Percentage of Disposable Personal
Income
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
1931 1951 1971 1981 1986 1991 1996 1999
Away fromhome
At home
3.3
20.2
3.7
17.33.6
9.9
4.4
8.7
4.3
7.5
4.2
7.4
4.2
6.6
4.2
6.2
Changes in the Per Capita Food Supply, 1970-1996
-35%-23%-22%
-15%17%21%23%26%
90%114%
143%
-50% 0% 50% 100% 150%
CoffeeEggsBeverage MilkRed Meat
Alcoholic BevFats & Oils
Fruits & VegFish
PoultrySoda
Cheese
Source: Economic Research Service
Channel Shopping Patterns
$65.521.0929%Wholesale Clubs
$17.171.5643%Dollar Stores
$17.743.0645%Convenience Stores
$20.401.2248%Drug Stores
$15.822.0265%Fast Food Restaurants
$45.411.4281%Mass Merchandisers
$72.932.0499%Supermarkets
Avg. Weekly Spending
Avg. Weekly Trips
Percent who ShopChannel
Source: Willard Bishop Consulting
8
We are all traders…
• Robinson Crusoe• Imports and exports• Competitive imports
– Imported items that are also produced domestically
• Complementary imports– Imported items that we can hardly produce at
all (bananas, tea, coffee)• When will trade occur?
Advantage in Free Trade• Adam Smith, 1776. The Wealth of Nations.
– Countries export the things they are able to produce more efficiently than anyone else
– Absolute advantage• David Ricardo, 1817. Principle of Political
Economy and Taxation.– A country might have absolute disadvantage in
everything– Mutually advantageous trade is still possible– Produce and export the good where absolute
disadvantage is less– Comparative advantage
The Law of Comparative Advantage
8or2France
10or5US
Relative price of food(Pf / Pc)
ClothingFood
Output from 1 unit of resource
2
4
Price is a Signal
• Fluctuating prices reflect the interdependence of several factors– Production– Transportation– Storage– Processing– Merchandising– Consumption
Seasonal Price Patterns
• The yearly change in prices that generally follow the same behavior year to year
• Can be affected by the storability of the commodity
• More perishable products are more costly to store and can only be stored to a certain degree
• Commodities that are more expensive to store will have a more distinct seasonal price pattern
9
Cobweb Model
• Shows how prices could be in continual disequilibrium
• Its logically possible to have fluctuating prices with the supply and demand curves in the same place
• Three possibilities– Continual disequilibrium– The converging case– The diverging case
Measuring Price Spreads
• Price Spreads for individual items– Difference between consumer’s price
and farm value of the ingredients– Affected by types of marketing and
processing services demanded by consumers
Farm-to-Retail Price Spread
• Farm-Retail spread = Pretail - Pfarm
• Must cover the operating costs of marketing firms plus profit
• Another measure of the marketing bill• Could also compare farm prices to a
market basket• Are retail prices the result of “cost plus”?• Are farm prices the result of derived
demand?
Transportation• Provides place and time utility• Truck
– Most of the shorter hauls– Accessible, convenient, quick– Perishables – milk, eggs, meat, fruits and vegetables
• Railroads– 30,000 railcars loaded with
grain each week on average• Barges
Storage• Adds time utility by good available when
they are desired• Matches production patterns with
consumption patterns
Quantity in Storage
Time
WI
Costs of Storage• Fixed Costs
– Bins and warehouses– Interest and depreciation– Repairs– Insurance and Taxes
• Variable Costs– Shrinkage– Quality deterioration– Loading and unloading– Quality maintenance
10
Grading
• Quality: the sum of commodity attributes that influences its acceptability to many buyers (and therefore price)
• Grading: dividing of a commodity into different quality classes
• Grades are useless unless they conform to differences in demand– Are people willing to pay more for a given quality
attribute?• Enables efficient trading – a short-cut to market
equilibrium
Problems with Grading
• Are grades objective measures of quality?• What happens if quality deteriorates after
grading?• Do grade standards change from stage to
stage of the marketing system?• Do grades reflect consumer preferences?• Are grades useful or meaningful to
consumers?
Examples of US Grades
Beef
Eggs
Proc Veg
Fresh Potatoes
Cheese
4th
Grade3rd
Grade2nd
GradeTop GradeProduct
Grade AA Grade A Grade B Grade C
Extra No 1 No 1 Commercial No 2
Grade A Grade B Grade C Grade D
Grade AA Grade A Grade B
USDA Prime
USDA Choice
USDA Select
USDA Standard
Grading vs. Branding
• Brands– Differentiate food products from one another– Increase non-price competition– Encourage product R&D and innovation
• Grades– Place foods into homogeneous classes– Increase price competition– Discourage product R&D and innovation
The Battle of the Brands
• Manufacturers’ brands (also called “national brands”)
• Store brands (also called “private labels”)• A struggle for channel leadership?• Do retailers want to replace the
manufacturers’ brands?
Combining Store and National Brands
• Increases category sales and profitability• Provides a means of price reference• Creates a usefulness measure (assurance
or value)• Provides greater shelf presence to attract
the shopper’s attention• Provides more opportunities for promotion
11
Private Label Penetrationin U.S. Supermarkets
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000
Unit ShareDollar Share
Source: Private Label
Commodity (Generic) Promotion
• Goal: increase demand (a positive shift)• Promotes the consumption of the general
commodity through a cooperative effort of producers
• Increased consumption of one commodity may offset another
• Reinforces the perception of product homogeneity
The Free Rider Problem
• Who pays for promotional efforts? Some generous individual?
• Benefits of commodity promotion accrue for all producers regardless of who pays
• Solution: make everyone pay– Promotional checkoff– A portion of all sales kept for promotion
The Marketing Mix
• Product– Incorporates a set of characteristics that are meant to
provide value to the consumer• Place
– Channels used to bring the product to the consumer –specialty or intensive distribution?
• Price– The most easily changed portion of the marketing mix
• Promotion– Includes advertising, personal selling, and sales
promotion
New Product Introductions
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
1989 1992 1995 1998Food Nonfood
• The annual average in the 1970s was about 1,000
• How many is “too many”?
• Only about 1/3 of new products actually make it to supermarket shelves
22,572
17,977
Slotting Allowances
• Lump-sum payments made to retailers by manufacturers in order to stock a new product
• Guaranteed trial period, typically 6 months
• May be required for space renewal on a poorly performing product
• Widely used only in the grocery industry• Ethical? Legal?
12
Average Slotting Fees by Category
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
1994 1999 2004*
GroceryHBC/GMProduceDeli
*Forecast
Product Life Cycle
Sale
sSa
les
StartStart GrowthGrowth MaturityMaturity DeclineDecline
Life Cycle Characteristics
DecliningStable Number
Growing NumberFewCompetitors
LaggardsMajorityEarly Adopters
Innova-torsCustomers
DecliningHighRisingNegativeProfits
LowLowAverageHighCosts per Customer
DecliningPeakRapidly RisingLowSales
DeclineMaturityGrowthIntroSTAGE
Marketing Variables change with Life Cycle
Meet competition (especially in oligopoly)Price dealing and price cutting
Skimming or penetrationPRICE
Build selective demandInform / persuade persuade / remind
Build primary demandPROMOTION
Moving toward more intensive distribution
Build channelsMaybe selective distribution
PLACE
Some drop out
“All the same” battle of brands
Variety,Build brand familiarity
One or fewPRODUCT
Pure Competition?
Monopolistic Competition,Oligopoly
Monopoly,Monopolistic Competition
COMPETITIVE SITUATION
DeclineMaturityGrowthIntroSTAGE
Break Even Point AnalysisTR
TC
FC
$$
VC
Pricing at Retail
• Two basic strategies– High-low variable pricing
• Prices and margins for small fraction of all products are varied in any given week
• Price cuts for these cases are significant– Everyday low prices (EDLP)
• Advertises a set of products with low prices• Prices may not be as low, but don’t fluctuate
• Loss leader pricing• Psychological pricing
13
Weekly Store Circular
•• 100100--150 items150 items
•• Items priced at low Items priced at low or possibly negative or possibly negative marginsmargins
•• Goal:Goal: increase traffic increase traffic by diverting by diverting customers from customers from competing storescompeting stores
Psychological Pricing
• Pricing methods meant to influence consumer buying habits based on consumer perceptions– Odd-cent pricing– Multiple-unit pricing– Prestige pricing
• For the most part, the effectiveness of these methods has not been proven
Philosophies of Marketing
• Mass marketing– One size fits all (hopefully)
• Product-variety marketing– Consumer needs and wants are always
changing– Provide more variety in quality, size and
styles• Target marketing
– Many products targeted at different subsets of the market
Steps in Target Marketing
1. Market segmentation– Divide the market into distinct groups of
buyers– Groups have different needs,
characteristics, or behaviors2. Market targeting
– Decide which market segment is most attractive (profitable)
3. Market positioning– Formulate a competitive position, and the
marketing mix
Demographic Segmentation
• Used a lot in marketing
• Matches well with the identification of consumer needs
• Easily measurable• Must be careful not to
stereotype your targeted market
• Geography• Age• Gender• Household size• Income• Occupation• Education• Ethnicity• Religion• Life-cycle stage
Psychographic Segmentation
• Similar to demographic segmentation• Segment the market according to social
class, lifestyle, personality• People within a demographic segment
could have very different psychographic profiles
14
Behavioral Segmentation
• Segment the market based on consumer knowledge about, attitude, use, or response to a product
• Buying occasions• Benefits sought in the product• Usage rate
– Light, medium, and heavy users• Loyalty
– Brand, store, or company
Definition of a Cooperative
“A user-owned and controlled business from which benefits are derived and distributed
equitably on the basis of use.”
Remember:
• The users are the customers
• This is a private business that competes in a free enterprise market economy
Why Cooperatives?
• To pool financial resources• To have access to more business
activities• Because certain goods or services might
not otherwise be provided• To combat market power
– Purchase inputs and services at lower costs– Receive better market prices and/or access
Universally Accepted Cooperative Principles
• Services at Cost– Does not mean nonprofit
• Ownership by Users– In proportion to use
• Control by Users– Not based on equity
Agricultural Co-ops by State
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
MN ND TX WI IL CA IA KS SD NE
Service Farm Supply Marketing
238
Centralized Cooperative
Member Member Member
Centralized Cooperative
Voting control, ownership, flow of patronage refunds
Physical flow of products purchased or marketed
15
Federated Cooperative
Member Member Member
Federated Cooperative
Member Member Member
LocalLocalCoCo--opop
LocalLocalCoCo--opop
LocalLocalCoCo--opop
Voting control, ownership, flow of patronage refunds
Physical flow of products purchased or marketed