The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity
-
Upload
canadian-centre-for-policy-alternatives -
Category
Business
-
view
3.510 -
download
1
description
Transcript of The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity
![Page 1: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082915/5456e262af7959755d8b4dff/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
The Macroeconomicsof Recession, Deficits,
and Austerity
Presentation by Jim StanfordFebruary 16 2012, Toronto
CCPA-Ontario “Deconstructing Drummond” Workshop
![Page 2: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082915/5456e262af7959755d8b4dff/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Macroeconomics of Deficits
• Ontario’s deficit was created by the financial crisis & recession (not over-spending).
• The recovery has been historically weak – that’s why the budget has been slow to recover.
• Austerity perversely prolongs recessionary conditions.
• Stimulating growth & employment is an essential pre-condition for improving fiscal health.
![Page 3: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082915/5456e262af7959755d8b4dff/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Ontario Provincial Deficit
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
5
2003-4 2004-5 2005-6 2006-7 2007-8 2008-9 2009-10 2010-11
$ Billi
on
![Page 4: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082915/5456e262af7959755d8b4dff/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Impact of Recession• Double-barreled impact on revenues:
– Decline in GDP (8-10% below previous trend)= $10 billion lost revenue.
– Decline in revenue as share of GDP (<1 point)= $5 billion lost revenue.
– Combined fiscal impact: $15 billion.
• Impact on expenditures:– Automatic stabilizers (income supports).– Discretionary stimulus.
• Impact on debt service:– Follow-through growth of interest costs.– Low interest rates have been helpful.
![Page 5: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082915/5456e262af7959755d8b4dff/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Scale of Potential Austerity (I)
• Liberal election platform: 1.8% annual growth in program spending.– Other parties almost identical.
• Amount required for constant real per capita spending: 3.1% annual.
• Drummond: 0.5% annual.– His 0.8% number is 2010-11 to 2017-18,
but that implies 0.5% per year going forward.
• Scale of real per capita cuts: $12 b annually by 2015-16.
![Page 6: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082915/5456e262af7959755d8b4dff/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Ont. Program Spending Profiles
110
115
120
125
130
2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Annu
al Pr
ogra
m S
pend
ing
($b)
Drummond
3.1%
1.8%
0.5%
ConstantReal Per Capita
Lib.Election
![Page 7: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082915/5456e262af7959755d8b4dff/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Scale of Potential Austerity (II)
• Liberal election platform: very slight decrease in real aggregate program spending.
• Amount required for constant real aggregate spending: 2% annual.
• Drummond: 0.8% annual.• Scale of real aggregate cuts: $7 b
annually by 2015-16.
![Page 8: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082915/5456e262af7959755d8b4dff/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
What a (Fiscal) Drag!• Scale of real per capita cuts: $12 billion
annually by 2015-16.• Scale of real aggregate cuts: $7 billion
annually by 2015-16.• Add a reasonable multiplier (1.5-to-1),
and that will reduce GDP by $10-18 billion.– 1.6% to 2.8% of GDP over next 4 years.
• Depending on what happens in other sectors, that could certainly drag Ontario into negative GDP territory.
![Page 9: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082915/5456e262af7959755d8b4dff/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Numerators, Denominators,and Other Basic Math
• Key constraint: debt ratio= Net debt GDP
• Reducing debt ratio requires reduction in the numerator and/or expansion in the denominator.
• Greece: The more they cut, the more GDP shrank, the worse the debt ratio became.
• Normal recovery? Ratio falls via denominator.
• No recovery? You need more spending.
![Page 10: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082915/5456e262af7959755d8b4dff/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Ontario Debt Ratios
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
2002-3 2003-4 2004-5 2005-6 2006-7 2007-8 2008-9 2009-10 2010-11
% of
GDP
Net Debt
Accumulated Deficit
![Page 11: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082915/5456e262af7959755d8b4dff/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Job Creation Strategies• Traditional engine of growth (private
sector investment) is not working.• Progressives need to develop visionary
but credible alternatives:– Avoid spending cuts; expand public services.
NB: Health care created 80,000+ jobs since 2009!
– Longer-run capital / infrastructure spending.– Targeted sector strategies.
• Needs different approaches on trade/investment.
– Other novel ways to channel investment:• Government as venture capital funder??? [Shiller]• Social sector / co-ops / other non-profits???
![Page 12: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082915/5456e262af7959755d8b4dff/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Ontario’s Deficitin the Federation
• Ontario’s situation in Canada has changed dramatically as Canada becomes an “energy superpower” & deindustrializes.
• That’s a key factor in provincial GDP weakness.
• It also explains why:– Ontario has less fiscal capacity than average.– Ontario spends less on programs than average.– Fiscal gaps across Canada are huge & growing.– Yet Ontario still net pays into federal equalization.
• Challenging the neoliberal economic vision for Canada is part of fighting to protect our public services in Ontario.
![Page 13: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022082915/5456e262af7959755d8b4dff/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
The Macroeconomicsof Recession, Deficits,
and Austerity
Presentation by Jim StanfordFebruary 16 2012, Toronto
CCPA-Ontario “Deconstructing Drummond” Workshop