The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity

13
The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity Presentation by Jim Stanford February 16 2012, Toronto CCPA-Ontario “Deconstructing Drummond” Workshop

description

CCPA Research Associate Jim Stanford's presentation of his analysis of the Drummond report's fiscal and economic projections.February 16 2012, TorontoCCPA-Ontario “Deconstructing Drummond” Workshop

Transcript of The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity

Page 1: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity

The Macroeconomicsof Recession, Deficits,

and Austerity

Presentation by Jim StanfordFebruary 16 2012, Toronto

CCPA-Ontario “Deconstructing Drummond” Workshop

Page 2: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity

Macroeconomics of Deficits

• Ontario’s deficit was created by the financial crisis & recession (not over-spending).

• The recovery has been historically weak – that’s why the budget has been slow to recover.

• Austerity perversely prolongs recessionary conditions.

• Stimulating growth & employment is an essential pre-condition for improving fiscal health.

Page 3: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity

Ontario Provincial Deficit

-25

-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

2003-4 2004-5 2005-6 2006-7 2007-8 2008-9 2009-10 2010-11

$ Billi

on

Page 4: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity

Impact of Recession• Double-barreled impact on revenues:

– Decline in GDP (8-10% below previous trend)= $10 billion lost revenue.

– Decline in revenue as share of GDP (<1 point)= $5 billion lost revenue.

– Combined fiscal impact: $15 billion.

• Impact on expenditures:– Automatic stabilizers (income supports).– Discretionary stimulus.

• Impact on debt service:– Follow-through growth of interest costs.– Low interest rates have been helpful.

Page 5: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity

Scale of Potential Austerity (I)

• Liberal election platform: 1.8% annual growth in program spending.– Other parties almost identical.

• Amount required for constant real per capita spending: 3.1% annual.

• Drummond: 0.5% annual.– His 0.8% number is 2010-11 to 2017-18,

but that implies 0.5% per year going forward.

• Scale of real per capita cuts: $12 b annually by 2015-16.

Page 6: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity

Ont. Program Spending Profiles

110

115

120

125

130

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16

Annu

al Pr

ogra

m S

pend

ing

($b)

Drummond

3.1%

1.8%

0.5%

ConstantReal Per Capita

Lib.Election

Page 7: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity

Scale of Potential Austerity (II)

• Liberal election platform: very slight decrease in real aggregate program spending.

• Amount required for constant real aggregate spending: 2% annual.

• Drummond: 0.8% annual.• Scale of real aggregate cuts: $7 b

annually by 2015-16.

Page 8: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity

What a (Fiscal) Drag!• Scale of real per capita cuts: $12 billion

annually by 2015-16.• Scale of real aggregate cuts: $7 billion

annually by 2015-16.• Add a reasonable multiplier (1.5-to-1),

and that will reduce GDP by $10-18 billion.– 1.6% to 2.8% of GDP over next 4 years.

• Depending on what happens in other sectors, that could certainly drag Ontario into negative GDP territory.

Page 9: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity

Numerators, Denominators,and Other Basic Math

• Key constraint: debt ratio= Net debt GDP

• Reducing debt ratio requires reduction in the numerator and/or expansion in the denominator.

• Greece: The more they cut, the more GDP shrank, the worse the debt ratio became.

• Normal recovery? Ratio falls via denominator.

• No recovery? You need more spending.

Page 10: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity

Ontario Debt Ratios

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

2002-3 2003-4 2004-5 2005-6 2006-7 2007-8 2008-9 2009-10 2010-11

% of

GDP

Net Debt

Accumulated Deficit

Page 11: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity

Job Creation Strategies• Traditional engine of growth (private

sector investment) is not working.• Progressives need to develop visionary

but credible alternatives:– Avoid spending cuts; expand public services.

NB: Health care created 80,000+ jobs since 2009!

– Longer-run capital / infrastructure spending.– Targeted sector strategies.

• Needs different approaches on trade/investment.

– Other novel ways to channel investment:• Government as venture capital funder??? [Shiller]• Social sector / co-ops / other non-profits???

Page 12: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity

Ontario’s Deficitin the Federation

• Ontario’s situation in Canada has changed dramatically as Canada becomes an “energy superpower” & deindustrializes.

• That’s a key factor in provincial GDP weakness.

• It also explains why:– Ontario has less fiscal capacity than average.– Ontario spends less on programs than average.– Fiscal gaps across Canada are huge & growing.– Yet Ontario still net pays into federal equalization.

• Challenging the neoliberal economic vision for Canada is part of fighting to protect our public services in Ontario.

Page 13: The Macroeconomics of Recession, Deficits, and Austerity

The Macroeconomicsof Recession, Deficits,

and Austerity

Presentation by Jim StanfordFebruary 16 2012, Toronto

CCPA-Ontario “Deconstructing Drummond” Workshop