The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

24
The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local

Transcript of The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

Page 1: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

The Local Control Accountability Plan

LCAP

Plan de Control Local

Page 3: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

8 state priorities Las 8 prioridades estatales

Group A – Conditions of learning• Basic – teachers, text, facilities• Implementation of Standards• Access to coursesGroup B – Student outcomes• Pupil Achievement• Other pupil outcomesGroup C – Engagement• Parent engagement• Student Engagement• School Climate

Condiciones de aprendizaje:• Basico - maestros, materiales,

establecimientos escolares• Implementacion de los estandares

estatales• Acceso a los cursosResultados de los alumnos:• Logro del alumno• Otros resultados de los alumnosCompromiso con la escuela:• Participation activa de los padres• Compromiso de los alumnos• Ambiente escolar

Page 4: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

State Priority 1 LCAP Goals 1, 2, 4 (Title II)Teachers Properly Assigned, Sufficient Instructional Materials, Facilities in Good Repair

2015Site

Sufficient Instructionalmaterials

Properly CredentialTeachersAssigned

Facility in Good Repair

ELSK-5 yes 18/19 yes

AMBK-5 yes 20/20 yes

MONK-5 yes 19/20 yes

LSJK-5 yes 21/21 yes

MON6-8 yes 25/28 yes

SBB6-8 yes 28/29 “Fair”

HM9-12 yes 37/40 yes

2016Site

Sufficient Instructional materials

Properly CredentialTeachersAssigned

Facility in Good Repair

ELSK-5 yes 19/19 yes

AMBK-5 yes 20/20 yes

MONK-5 yes 20/20 yes

LSJK-5 yes 21/21 yes

MON6-8 yes 26/28 yes

SBB6-8 yes 28/29 yes

HM9-12 yes 38/40 yes

Page 5: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

State Priority 1 LCAP Goals 1, 2, 4 Teachers Properly Assigned, Sufficient Instructional Materials, Facilities in Good Repair

• Common Core Instructional Materials for ELA, Math, ELD and Next Generation Science Standards purchased for all students (Goal 1, Action 3)

• Bathroom remodel completed at SBB, elevating FIT report from ‘fair’ to good (Goal 4, Action 5)

• All elementary schools are fully staffed with appropriately credentialed teachers (Goal 1, Action 1)

• 1 Teacher with Science credential teaching math at each MS site on waiver while completing requirements for Math

• 1 Physics class taught by teacher with Earth Sciences credential on waiver while completing requirements for Physics

• 3 Secondary RSP teachers 1 MS, 2 HS teaching on waiver while completing Mild to Moderate Certification

Page 6: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

State Priority 2 LCAP Goals 2, 3, 4 Implementation of Common Core Standards

• Common Core Aligned Instructional Materials, ELA/ELD, Math, Science purchased for all students (Goal 1, Action 3)

• Professional Development – Implementation of Next Generation Science Standards provided by subject/grade level

MOU/County Office of Education + Release Time (Goal 1, Action 4)

• SBAC Baseline Results (See achievement results for State Priority 4)

Page 7: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

State Priority 3 LCAP Goals 3, 4 Parental Involvement LEAP / Title III

• Response to parent survey increased: 79% Response Spring 2015 / Compared to 59% Response to Spring 2014 (Goal 4, Action 5)

• Parent Portal Online usage has increased by 23%. 6888 parents accessed Parent Portal up from 5600. (Goal 4, Action 6)

• District Website updated with “Google Translate” – District and school webpages now translate to 88 languages

Page 8: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

State Priority 4 LCAP Goals 2, 3, 4 Student Achievement LEAP

% of students “Met” or Exceeded” the Achievement Standard English /Language Arts

District White (non Hispanic

Hispanic Asian AfricanAmerican

EL LowIncome

SPED

Grade 3 60 65 49 68 51 41 44 28

Grade 4 62 66 50 69 50 42 42 30

Grade 5 58 63 43 67 49 39 39 50

Grade 6 61 65 48 65 48 44 50 41

Grade 7 60 59 49 61 45 43 48 38

Grade 8 65 67 45 64 51 48 50 41

Grade 11

62 69 43 70 54 41 52 27

Page 9: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

6062

5861 60

6562

65 6663

65

59

6769

49 50

43

48 4945

43

68 6967

6561

64

70

51 50 49 4845

5154

41 4239

44 43

48

4144

42

39

5048

5052

28 30

50

4138

41

27

District

White

Hispanic

Asian

African American

EL

Low Income

SPED

% of students “Met” or Exceeded” the Achievement Standard English /Language Arts

Page 10: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

State Priority 4 LCAP Goals 2, 3, 4 Student Achievement LEAP

% of students “Met” or Exceeded” the Achievemnt Standard Mathematics

District White (non Hispanic

Hispanic Asian AfricanAmerican

EL LowIncome

SPED

Grade 3 61 65 49 68 51 41 44 28

Grade 4 60 66 50 69 50 42 42 30

Grade 5 59 63 43 67 49 39 39 50

Grade 6 61 65 48 65 48 44 50 41

Grade 7 57 59 49 61 45 43 48 38

Grade 8 62 67 45 64 51 48 50 41

Grade 11

61 69 43 70 54 41 52 27

Page 11: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 110

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

61 60 5961

57

62 6165 66

6365

59

6769

49 50

43

48 4945

43

68 6967

6561

64

70

51 50 49 4845

5154

41 4239

44 43 48 4144

42 39

5048

5052

28 30

50

4138

41

27

District

White

Hispanic

Asian

African Amer-ican

EL

Low Income

SPED

% of students “Met” or Exceeded” the Achievement Standard Mathematics

Page 12: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

State Priority 4 LCAP Goals 2, 3, 4 Student Achievement LEAP / Title III

2014/2015

District White (non Hispanic

Hispanic Asian AfricanAmerican

EL Low Income

SPED

Title IIIAMAO 1

73.7/76.2

N/A 67.2/68.1

74.1/78.6

N/A 73.7/76.2

N/A N/A

Title IIIAMAO 2

63.3/66.4

N/A 59.5/63.7

66.1/68.1

N/A 63.3/66.4

N/A N/A

GradRate

87.3 /88.4

91.5/93.1

79.6/81.4

95.2/96.8

84.4/85.5

63.6/64.2

86.4/86.7

89.1/90.1

% students scoring >3 on AP

72 75 60 79 54 41 50 48

% of 11th and 12th enrolled 1 or more AP

63 72 54 79 57 33 48 11

Page 13: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

716728 729 739 745

763 756

617637 632

654675

705 705

663 674 666685

698726 730

512530

505530

516544 541

API Comparison - MPUSD/English Learner/SED/SPED LCAP State Priority 4 2007 - 2013

MPUSD API - All Students

Linear (MPUSD API - All Students)

API-English Learner

Linear (API-English Learner)

API-Socio Economi-cally Disadvantaged

Linear (API-Socio Economically Disad-vantaged)

SPED

Linear (SPED)

API No longer calculated by state new measure will be based on multiple measures

Page 14: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013580

600

620

640

660

680

700

720

740

760

780

716

728 729

739745

763

756

673

698

682

692

706

722

709

652

660664

683

693

720 719

API Comparison MPUSD/African American/Hispanic - LCAP State Priority 4 2007 - 2013

MPUSD API

Linear (MPUSD API)

API - Black African American

Linear (API - Black African Amer-ican)

API - Hispanic / Latino

Linear (API - Hispanic / Latino)

API No longer calculated by the state. A new measure will be based on multiple measures and will create a new baseline.

Page 15: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 20130

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

USD API Growth for significant subgroups - 2007-2013 LCAP State Priority 4

African AmericanAsianFilipinoHispanic / LatinoPacific IslanderWhite2 or more racesSEDELSPED

Page 16: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

State Priority 5 LCAP Goals 2, 3, 4 Pupil Engagement

Attendance – Percentage ADA by site

Site 2014ALL

2015ALL

2014EL

2015EL

2014LI

2015LI

2014FY

2015FY

District95.16 94.81 94.63 94.35 94.62 94.56 95.16 94.81

5ELS K-594.9 94.47 95.4 95.3 95.24 95.27 N/A N/A

AMB K-593.14 94.79 95.48 94.79 95.56 94.74 N/A N/A

MON K-595.25 94.62 94.85 95.28 95.27 94.72 N/A N/A

LSJ K-595.25 94.62 94.85 94.82 94.64 94.51 N/A N/A

MON 6-895.15 95.05 95.45 95.66 95.95 96.31 N/A N/A

SBB 6-895.16 94.81 94.63 94.35 94.62 94.56 N/A N/A

HM 9-12 94.9 94.47 95.4 95.3 95.24 95.27 94.9 94.47

Page 17: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

State Priority 5 LCAP Goals 2, 3, 4 Pupil Engagement -

2014ALL

2015ALL

2014EL

2015EL

2014LI

2015LI

2014FY

2015FY

District95.16 94.81 94.63 94.35 94.62 94.56 95.16 94.81

TK - K93.14 94.79 95.48 94.79 95.56 94.74 93.14 94.79

K-395.16 94.81 94.63 94.35 94.62 94.56 95.16 94.81

4-595.25 94.62 94.85 94.82 94.64 94.51 95.25 94.62

6-895.15 95.05 95.45 95.66 95.95 96.31 95.15 95.05

9-1294.9 94.47 95.4 95.3 95.24 95.27 94.9 94.47

Page 18: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

State Priority 6 LCAP Goals 2, 3, 4 School Climate

Suspensions /Expulsions --- Number of suspensions / expulsions by site

Site 2014ALL

2015ALL

2014EL

2015EL

2014LI

2015LI

2014FY

2015FY

District 437/6 391/4 198/2 179/2 167/2 159/2 14/0 12/0

5ELS K-5 3/0 4/0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

AMB K-5 11/0 9/0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

MON K-5 10/0 11/0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

LSJ K-5 14/0 11/0 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

MON 6-8 111/1 91/0 41/0 37/0 35/1 34/0 N/A N/A

SBB 6-8 127/0 101/0 35/0 39/0 28/0 31/0 N/A N/A

HM 9-12 161/5 164/4 42/2 38/1 37/2 33/1 N/A N/A

Page 19: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

American Indian Asian African American Filipino Hispanic Pacific I White0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00% Suspension Proportionality

% supensions% population

State Priority 6 School Climate LCAP Goals 2, 3, 4

Page 20: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

State Priority 7 LCAP Goals 2, 3, 4 Course Access

2014/2015

All Students

EL Students

LIStudents

White Hispanic AfricanAmer.

SPED

K-8 CC ELA 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96%*

K-8 CCMath 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 96%*

K-8 NGSS100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94%*

8th Grade Algebra 79%/

81%52% /53%

61% /62%

78% / 79%

66% / 67%

68% /70%

44% /45%

A-G Enroll-Ment10-12

82% /84%

65% /66%

70% /73%

80% /82%

69% /71%

70% /72%

41% /43%

Page 21: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

State Priority 8 LCAP Goals 2, 3, 4 Other Student Outcomes LEAP

2014/2015 All Students

EL Students

LIStudents

White Hispanic AfricanAmer.

SPED

K-5 Reading Benchmark% @ Gr Level

82% /84%

61% /63%

72% /76%

86% /88%

70% /73%

71% /74%

50% /55%

K-5 Math Benchmark % @ Gr. Level

79% /81%

56% /61%

71% /72%

81% /82%

64% /63%

61% /64%

45% /45%

CTEPathwayCompletion (for CTE enrolled)

82%/85%

80% /82%

81% /82%

82% /84%

82% /84%

79% /81%

71% /69%

A-GCompletionHS Grads

44% /47%

25% /24%

32% /36%

52% /59%

35% /34%

35% /27%

22% /26%

Page 22: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-140%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

27%

18%19%

28%

35%

27%

59%58%

72%

64%63%

69%

37%

50%

57%55% 53%

72%

11%

29%

38%

11%

24%

47%

19%20%

28%

25%

35% 34%

40%

50%

46%48%

52%

59%

32% 33%

43%

37%

44%46%

USD Percentage of graduates completing A-G requirement 2008-2014

African AmericanAsianFilipinoHawaiian /PIHispanic / LatinoWhiteMPUSD Total

State Priority 7/8 Course Access / Other Student Outcomes

Page 23: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

232010 2011 2012 2013 2014

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

13% 13%

30%

45%

49%

18%20%

25%

29%

0%

26%27%

29%31%

0%

Advanced Placement - AP Exam takers as a percentage of 11th and 12th grade enrollment

Percentage of AP exam takers based on 11th and 12th grade enrollment MPUSDPercentage of AP exam takers based on 11th and 12th grade enrollment Monterey CountyPercentage of AP exam takers based on 11th and 12th grade enrollment California

Note: AP exam takers includes 10th grade test takers but CDE Data Quest model calculates percentage based on 11th and 12th grade enrollment

State Priority 7/8 Course Access / Other Student Outcomes

Page 24: The Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP Plan de Control Local.

State Priority 7/8 Course Access / Other Student Outcomes

52%

44%

34% 35%33%

48%50%

48% 47%

0

58% 58% 59% 58%

00%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Advanced Placement Test Comparison - % of students scoring 3 or above

Percentage 3+ MPUSD

Percentage 3+ Monterey County

Percentage 3+ California